Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
human rights:
Protecting
the vulnerable
March 2011
Strengthening human rights: protecting the vulnerable
In a mature democracy like Australia, human rights are about targeted rights improvement
and protections for our most vulnerable people.
For most of us, a free press, responsible government and the rule of law ensure our
freedom and protection. But there is always more to be done for those who remain
marginalised and vulnerable.
The Government’s responsibility is to protect these people and respond to these gaps. It’s
a responsibility I take very seriously.
From day one of my administration, I put the care for the most vulnerable in our community
at the heart of my Government as well as working to strengthen individual rights.
We have introduced laws that redress discrimination, protect vulnerable groups, and
prevent the abuse of power. We have delivered more resources to people in need.
It was NSW Labor who set up the NSW Anti-Discrimination Board and the Administrative
Decision Tribunal to provide independent external review of Government decisions.
And it was NSW Labor who established the Office of the Privacy Commissioner and the
Community Relations Commission to promote equal rights and responsibilities. This has
been a tradition I have been proud to continue.
• Increased funding to legal aid from $26.5 million in 1996 to $98.4 million in 2009;
• Provided during 2006-11 $1.3 billion for 29,000 additional places in disability
services and
• a further $2 billion to double the number of places by 2016; and
• Negotiated a landmark agreement to ensure payments to asbestos victims valued
at $1.7 billion.
We will seek to amend the NSW Constitution to give people a guaranteed right to vote, our
greatest human rights protection in a mature democracy.
We will hold an inquiry into the establishment of a Human Rights Commission and respond
to its recommendations. It would be similar to what exists in other States and Territories
around Australia.
We will amend the Anti Discrimination Act to prohibit discrimination against more
vulnerable groups such as those who are victims of domestic violence.
Better human rights protection is about the creation of a fairer society. The Keneally Labor
Government is committed to this ideal. These reforms deliver on that commitment:
• The insertion of the right to vote in the Constitution is a historic reform that will
ensure your freedom and your right to be heard into the future.
• An analysis of judicial review will help ensure and expand your rights for a review of
government decisions further guaranteeing your right to always have a say.
• The proposed amendments to the Anti-discrimination Act will ensure you cannot be
discriminated against if you are in an unpaid vocational industry placement or
training, a person with an impairment doing paid or unpaid work in a sheltered
workshop, a volunteer, a person who has experienced domestic violence, or a
person who has been the victim of a crime.
All this means a fairer society, a kinder society and one with greater opportunity for all.
That’s something we will all benefit from.
ACTION:
Amend the Anti Discrimination Act to protect vulnerable groups
Amend the Anti Discrimination Act to prohibit discrimination against volunteers, unpaid
workers, victims of crime and domestic violence
Make it easier for people to apply for judicial review of government decisions that
affect their rights and interests
Release a discussion paper outlining options for the reform of the law of judicial review
to ensure greater government accountability and transparency
Our challenges
The best path to human rights protection is often a heavily debated one.
We are committed to this process of constant improvement. The proposals in this policy
respond to a call for a greater focus on human rights protection and promotion, the
protection a set of vulnerable people who have been identified as in need of that
protection, clarification of our rights and more rights for us to question government
decisions, and a more transparent and accountable government.
LABOR OPPOSITION
Established the Legislative Review Committee to The Opposition has no policy on human rights.
scrutinise legislation and regulation to ensure
compliance with human rights standards.
In 2009, we passed the NSW Trustee and The Shadow Attorney General, Greg Smith
Guardian Act to accord rights to people with opposed these reforms saying that people with
disabilities so that they may live with dignity and cognitive impairments or disabilities are so
as much autonomy as possible, and to create the dangerous that security guards would be needed
NSW Trustee & Guardian to better serve their to protect the public. (SMH, 23.06.2009)
needs.
In the last 12 months, the NSW Government paid The Shadow Attorney General has talked about
out over $60 million in compensation to over taking it easy on people who commit crimes, but
4,500 victims to help with their rehabilitation. has not said anything about supporting the
victims of their crimes.
Established the Jackson Commission into James The Howard Government refused to come to the
Hardie asbestos funding in 2003 table and help asbestos victims when James
Hardie first moved offshore to the Netherlands.
The success of bringing James Hardie to
account resided squarely with NSW Labor.
Peter Costello dragged his feet on taxation
Negotiated a landmark agreement to ensure
reform that would have assisted the asbestos
payments to victims valued at $1.7 billion for the
fund, and was dragged kicking and screaming to
next 40 years with Bernie Banton and the ACTU
make the reforms by victims, unions and the
in 2004 and 2005
NSW Government
In 2007, the then Health Minister Tony Abbott
called Mr Banton’s petition containing the
Passed laws in 2006 which extended further signatures of 17,000 people supporting the listing
benefits for dust diseases claimants in the of the mesothelioma drug Alimta on the
context of broader personal injury reform Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) a "stunt"
and suggested that Mr Banton's motives were
"not pure"
When the intervention of the global economic
crisis brought the future of the asbestos
compensation fund into doubt, the NSW Labor In NSW, the Coalition has done nothing. No
Government took the lead in securing a rescue reform proposals. No legislation. No action
package with the Commonwealth and together
we injected a loan of $320 million into the Fund.
Established the NSW Anti Discrimination Board.
Introduced the Anti Discrimination Act 1977.
Established the Community Relations
Commission to promote equal rights and
responsibilities for all residents of NSW and
seeks to advance community harmony,
participation and access to services.
In 2010, introduced a relationships register to
protect the rights of those in unmarried and same
sex relationships.
In 2010, legalised non commercial surrogacy
arrangements.
In 2008 passed legislation which removed the
power of the Government Executive to make
decisions the care detention and treatment of
mentally ill people, transferring that power to the
specialist Mental Health Review tribunal
NSW Labor | Strengthening human rights | March 2011 6
In 2008 changed definition of de-facto partner to
include a same sex partner.
Introduced the Workplace Surveillance Act 2005.
This Act seeks to prohibit covert surveillance of
an employee without appropriate notice.
Introduced the Health Records and Information
Privacy Act 2002. This Act provides a right of
access to health information held by both public
and private sector organisations in NSW, and
sets up a framework for resolving complaints
about the handling of health information.
Introduced the Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act
2000. The Act regulates the use and destruction
of material obtained and sets out rules for placing
and matching profiles derived from forensic
material on a national DNA database.
In 1999 amended the Property Relationships Act
to accord the same property rights to people in
same sex relationships as people in heterosexual
relationships.
Introduced the State Records Act 1998.
Established the Office of the NSW Privacy
Commissioner. Introduced the Privacy and
Personal Information Protection Act 1998. This
Act provides for a set of privacy standards
(Information Protection Principles) for the New
South Wales public sector which regulate the
way public sector agencies handle personal
information and also created the Office of NSW
Privacy Commissioner.
Established the Administrative Decisions
Tribunal to provide independent, external review
of government decisions as well as to adjudicate
disputes between private citizens including anti
discrimination complaints and professional
misconduct inquiries. Introduced the
Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997.
Introduced the Criminal Records Act 1991
(introduced spent convictions). Spent convictions
schemes offer persons convicted of less serious
offences, who have since completed lengthy
periods of good behaviour, the opportunity to
start afresh as law-abiding and productive
members of society.
Introduced the Listening Devices Act 1984. This
Act regulates use of listening devices and the
admissibility of evidence collected as a result.
Established the NSW Anti Discrimination Board.
Introduced the Anti Discrimination Act 1977.
Passed laws to strengthen the Charter of Victims
Rights
Launched a new victims’ access line that
provides a one-stop-shop for information about
dealing with the justice system
Made it much simpler to apply for compensation,
and made changes to speed up the process of
awarding compensation
NSW Labor | Strengthening human rights | March 2011 7
Required Prosecutors to certify in court that they
have consulted with victims on pleas and facts
Established a specialist unit to protect the
confidential communications of victims of sexual
assault
The only guaranteed right to vote arises from section 22 of the Constitution, and the only
effect of s22 is that a persons right to vote in periodic Legislative Council elections is to be
the same as his or her entitlement to vote in general elections of the Legislative
Assembly5. Section 7A of the Constitution purports to entrench s22 so that it can not be
directly or impliedly amended or repealed unless such a change is approved by the people
in a referendum6. However, there is no constitutional guarantee of person’s right to vote for
the Legislative Assembly7. The view has also been taken that there is no right to vote
implied by the Constitution, and that it is up to the Parliament to decide who is entitled to
vote8.
In the 21st century it is not good enough that the people of NSW do not possess a
guaranteed right to vote. Such a right is essential to the protection of human rights. It is
through our system of democracy in which elected representatives are held accountable to
the people, that the people are able to require reform and protection of their rights from
their government. Therefore, a re-elected Keneally Labor Government will seek to insert in
the NSW Constitution a right to vote in general elections of the Legislative Assembly
(subject to the current exceptions contained in the Parliamentary Electorates and Elections
Act - for example those under 18 and mentally ill). It is envisaged that under s22 of the
Constitution, this will secure the right to vote for both the Legislative Assembly and
Legislative Council.
NSW Labor will also seek to entrench this right, by expanding the provisions of s7B, which
provides certain provisions can only be amended by referendum, to apply to it. It is
expected that this will also provide for the entrenchment of the requirement for a
referendum (i.e. so that it itself can only be amended by referendum) as s7B already
provides for this.
Further detailed advice will be sought on these proposals after the election, and the way
they will be achieved necessarily remain subject to that advice. However, our preliminary
advice indicates that Parliament has the power to make these changes in the manner
described, and by an ordinary act of Parliament (i.e. without the requirement for a
referendum). The right to vote will be subject to reasonable limitations that exist such as
age, citizenship and so forth.
1
See Twomey A (2004), The Constitution of New South Wales, Riverwood NSW, The Federation Press, pp
329 – 331.
2
See for example ss 11B, 28 and 28A
3
Part 3B
4
Ibid at 1 p 331
5
Ibid at 1 pg 330
6
Ibid at 1 pg 330
7
Ibid at 1 pg 330
8
Ibid at 1 pg 331
NSW Labor | Strengthening human rights | March 2011 9
ACTION:
Amend the NSW Constitution to guarantee the right to vote by
inserting the right to vote and entrenching that right so that it can
not be changed other than by referendum
The Anti-Discrimination Board (NSWADB) plays a prominent role in ensuring people are
treated fairly and that human rights are protected in NSW. The Board administers the
NSW Anti-Discrimination Act and aims to promote anti-discrimination and equal
opportunity principles and policies. The Board provides an enquiry and complaints service
and has dealt with more than 34,000 cases in its 32 years of operation, helping to
safeguard rights. Further it actively promotes human rights awareness through
consultations, education programs, seminars, talks, participation in the community
functions and written information. The Board advises government, which takes these
principles into account in making sound and positive policy decisions.
The Australian Human Rights Commission (HREOC) also provides an oversight role but at
a Commonwealth level. It reviews the conduct of Commonwealth agencies, administers
Commonwealth legislation, and promotes human rights issues of national concern. The
Commission can conciliate complaints, intervene in litigation, investigate alleged breaches
of human rights and recommend action. It also provides advice and makes submissions to
parliament and the government on laws, policies and programs, and undertakes and
coordinates research into human rights and discrimination issues.
Within the framework provided by these human rights protections, there is scope to
consider establishing a NSW Human Rights Commission, to further and more broadly
protect and promote Human Rights in NSW.
If re-elected a Keneally Labor Government will hold a Parliamentary Inquiry into the
proposal to create a commission. The inquiry will be asked to determine the rights and
responsibilities of such a commission including:
The inquiry will also be asked to take into account the work being undertaken by Standing
Committee of Attorneys General to harmonise anti-discrimination laws nationally. The
proposal to integrate the administration of the Commonwealth, State and Territory
discrimination (while maintaining separate but harmonised laws) including cooperative
administrative arrangements between Commissions will be of particular relevance to this
inquiry.
To date in NSW the existing independent review bodies and our democratic system of
government have done a good job of protecting human rights and resolving human rights
concerns.
In Government NSW Labor has responded to community concerns and these bodies and
passed numerous laws to redress discrimination, protect marginalised groups, and prevent
the abuse of power. These range from the introduction of the Relationships Register (to
protect the rights of unmarried couples and those in same sex relationships), to the
recognition of Aboriginal people in the NSW constitution, to the creation of the NSW
Trustee & Guardian (to better protect the rights of the disabled).
ACTION:
Hold an inquiry into the creation of a NSW Human Rights
Commission to further and more broadly protect and promote
human rights
Currently in NSW, judicial review exists only as a common law right—unlike the
Commonwealth, Queensland and Tasmania, we do not have a Judicial Review Act. While
procedures surrounding applications for judicial review are set out in the Supreme Court’s
procedural legislation, there is in NSW no legislation which sets out clear grounds for
judicial review.
Under existing common law, judicial review can occur in relation to local councils making
traffic control decisions that adversely affect residents; the legality of Government
department decisions in relation to the granting of permits, licences and entitlements (such
as water access licences and liquor licences); or professional disciplinary board that have
denied a person procedural fairness.
Issuing a Discussion Paper canvassing options for improved judicial review in NSW is
aimed at making the law clearer for everybody and encouraging more and better
accountability and transparency in Government decision-making. People could be made
more easily aware of their rights and therefore more easily access judicial review. Clear
laws would also encourage better compliance in agency decision-making. This would also
potentially address corruption risks.
The Discussion Paper provides options for reform of common law rights, and it also
provides options for new laws that advance the law of judicial review to further promote
Government accountability and transparency.
This includes the introduction of a general duty to provide reasons for all Government and
administrative decision-makers – this would ensure individuals are made fully aware of
why a decision has been a certain way, and allow them to consider what further rights they
may have. It would also address corruption risks by making Government decision-makers
give clear reasons.
It also discusses clarifying whether certain classes of decisions are judicially reviewable –
for example, decisions of the Governor in Council, certain Cabinet decisions which affect
individuals (that is, not policy decisions), and decisions made under published guidelines
and regulations (instead of just decisions made under legislative authority). The aim is to
promote transparency and accountability.
ACTION:
Release a discussion paper outlining options for the reform of
the law of judicial review to ensure greater government
accountability and transparency
Also, there is no prohibition on discrimination against people on the grounds of their having
been a victim of crime. In 2009, the Government increased the maximum amount of
compensation that can be received from $40,000 to $100,000.
As regards volunteers and unpaid workers, this means a range of people miss out on
these crucial protections, such as students on work experience placements, persons in
unpaid vocational industry placement or training, and persons with an impairment doing
paid or unpaid work in a sheltered workshop. Moreover, these people are often required to
work unpaid, for example, to gain experience and entry into an industry, to get back into
employment, as social inclusion for older or disabled people, or to prevent further
disadvantage9.
The Keneally Labor Government understands that discrimination against unpaid workers is
no less damaging just because it occurs outside a formal employment relationship, and
this is particularly so in the case of such vulnerable people. It is not acceptable, and if re-
elected will amend the Act to prohibit discrimination against volunteers and unpaid workers
on all of the grounds referred to above.
Victims of crime
Victims groups in NSW have also called for the legislation, such as Howard Brown from
Victims of Crime Assistance League and Martha Jabour Executive Director of the
Homicide Victims Support Group. Both have indicated that discrimination in the workplace
is an issue for all victims of crime including the families of homicide victims.
9
Equality Act for a Fairer Victoria: Equal Opportunity Review Final Report, June 2008: paragraph 5.144
10
Domestic Violence Discrimination in the Workplace: Is Statutory Protection Necessary: Sep 2010
11
Ms Alana Heffernan
NSW Labor | Strengthening human rights | March 2011 14
Mr Brown has reported receiving complaints from victims who have been refused leave
after experiencing the trauma of being a victim of crime. He also reports that victims can
sometimes encounter difficulties in obtaining time off work to attend court when they are
required to give evidence as a witness. Ms Jabour relayed a number of case examples
where the family members of a homicide victim have had problems obtaining leave to
attend counselling and support group meetings. Another encountered resistance in
seeking flexible study arrangements from an educational institution. It is also possible that
victims of non-domestic violence assault could experience the same kind of discrimination
as that suffered by “Holly” in the example drawn from the Queensland Working Women’s
Service report.
Given the specific examples of discrimination against victims of crime occurring in the
workplace and in educational institutions, a re-elected Keneally Government will extend
the proposed new prohibition to those areas.
It is also foreseeable that due to the physical and emotional and/or mental trauma which
can occur as a result of being a victim of crime, a person so affected could be refused
certain services. For example, an exclusive nightclub might refuse entry to a victim like
“Holly” on the basis of her physical appearance. Similarly, it is also possible that a
domestic violence victim in “Jane’s” position might be refused temporary accommodation
at a hotel if the manager had a misguided belief that, like “Jane’s” employer, her presence
would breach a supposed duty of care to other clients and staff.
Therefore, a re-elected Keneally Government will also extend this prohibition to the
provision of goods and services, registered clubs and accommodation.
Asbestos victims and their representatives have recently requested changes to the way
compensation is paid to dependants following the loss of a loved one.
It is important that families are fairly compensated for their loss. And it is also important
that the compensation regime operating in NSW is the best and fairest that it can be.
That is why the Keneally Government referred this area of law to the Law Reform
Commission, who will look at this matter in depth and seek comment from stakeholders
and the community.
This action is supported by stakeholders such as the NSW Bar Association and the
AMWU.
The NSW Labor Government has a proud record of supporting asbestos victims, and it is a
record that we are privileged to uphold and contribute to. The dedication of asbestos
victims, their families and supporters to achieving justice is an inspiration to all Australians.
ACTION:
A re-elected Keneally Government will make it a priority to
respond to the recommendations of the Law Reform Commission
In 2009 the NSW Government referred the issue of Substitute Decision Making for People
Lacking Capacity to the Standing Committee on Social Issues.
• Amend the Guardianship Act to mirror the T&G Act so that it allows the Tribunal to
make an order for the management of the whole or part of the estate of a person.
• Amend the T&G Act and Guardianship Act to allow the NSW Trustee and the Guardian
with the discretion to decide how private managers must lodge accounts for review and
exempting from liability for the exercise of this discretion, subject to the establishment
of a proper risk assessment mechanism and consultation with stakeholders.
A number of other recommendations (20, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 34) will be the subject of
further consultation. Other recommendations made to amend the Guardianship Act will
also be considered by the Minister for Disability Services. Recommendations 1, 4 and 5
A re-elected Keneally Government will consult with relevant stakeholders and develop a
proposal to establish an Office of the Public Advocate to defend the rights of people with
impaired decision-making ability.
The Public Advocate’s duties would include investigating agencies that provide services to
people with impaired decision making ability and initiating legal action when necessary to
protect their rights.
ACTION:
Implement recommendations of the report on substitute decision
making to increase the rights and autonomy of people with
disabilities and make it a priority to consult with relevant
stakeholders to develop a proposal for the establishment of an
Office of the Public Advocate
Authorised and printed by Michael Lee, 377 Sussex Street Sydney NSW 2000.