Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Review
1. Abstract
Research is the essential part of graduate and post graduate program. Without conducting any
academic research the objectives of the course will not be fulfilled. But conducting research is not
as easy as we thought. It is a systematic investigation to acquire new knowledge, information's,
facts, appropriate solution to a problem, deduce theory and generalization. It helps scholars to
expand the area of knowledge and further study. There are various micro steps should be
followed by the teachers for effective academic research. Before conducting research, the
researcher have to submit the research proposal for approvable. When the research proposal is
approved by the department then the research should be conducted consultation with the research
guide.
1
3. Research proposal
Outline of Chapters and Sections of a
The preparation of research proposal is an Research Proposal
important step in the research process. It provides
a detail plan strategy to conduct an academic TITLE PAGE
research. A research proposal is an overall plan,
scheme, structure and strategy designed to obtain
answers to the research questions or problems that
constitute your research project. It is intended to TABLE OF CONTENTS
convince others that you have a worthwhile
research project and that you have the competence
and work plan to complete it. A proposal should
state your reasons for undertaking the study. CHAPTER I – Introduction
"Broadly a research proposal's main function is to
detail the operational plan for obtaining answers Background
to your research questions. In doing so it ensures
and reassures the reader of the validity of the Statement of the problem
methodology for obtaining answer to your
research questions accurately and objectively." Significance of the study
Ranjit Kumar, 2006:188. In the word of Best and
Khan, 2003:35 "The proposal is comparable to the Objectives of the research
blueprint that an architect prepares before the bids
are let and building commences." Generally, a Research questions and/or hypotheses
research proposal should contain all the key
elements involved in the research process and Delimitation of the study
included sufficient information for the readers to
evaluate the proposed study. Definitions of the term used (Operational
definitions)
The quality of your research proposal depends
not only on the quality of your proposed project,
CHAPTER II – Literature Review
but also on the quality of your proposal writing. A
Theoretical literatures
good research project may run the risk of
Thematic literatures
rejection simply because the proposal is poorly
Conceptual Framework
written. Therefore, it pays if your writing is
coherent, clear and compelling.
CHAPTER III - Methodology
Research design
The research proposal most tells you, your Population and sampling
research supervisor and reviewers the following Sources of Data
information's about your study: Instrumentation (include copy in appendix)
Validity and reliability of Instrumentation
• What are proposing to do; Analysis and Interpretation
• How you plan to proceed; Strategy to conduct research
• Why you selected the proposed strategy. Procedure and time frame
A literature review may be presented as a paper on its own, or it can be contained as an integral
part of an article, research proposal, research report or dissertation.
It describes, compares, contrasts and evaluates the major theories, arguments, themes,
methodologies, approaches and controversies in the scholarly literature on a subject. It also
connects compares and contrasts these arguments, themes and methodologies etc., with the
concerns of a proposed piece of research (that is, the aims of the essay, research project or thesis,
the research questions, and the central hypothesis). The literature review is:
• not an annotated bibliography
• not a summary of each of your sources listed one by one
• not just a descriptive summary of the historical background to your topic
In a literature review, your central focus is examining and evaluating what has been said before
on a topic, and establishing the relevance of this information to your own research. You may also
identify what has not been said in the literature on a subject (this is called ‘a gap in the literature’,
and filling such gaps with new knowledge is a particular interest of postgraduate scholarship).
You may also need to discuss the methodologies that have been used in the literature and how
these relate to your chosen method.
A literature review gives an overview of the field of inquiry: what has already been said on the
topic, who the key writers are, what the prevailing theories and hypotheses are, what questions
are being asked, and what methodologies and methods are appropriate and useful.
A critical literature review shows how prevailing ideas fit into your own thesis, and how your
thesis agrees or differs from them.
This depends on what the literature review is for, and what stage you are at in your studies. Your
supervisor or tutor should specify a minimum number of references.
Generally speaking, a reasonable number of references in a literature review would be:
Find out what has been written on your subject. Use as many bibliographical sources as you can
to find relevant titles. The following are likely sources:
• Bibliographies and references in key textbooks and recent journal articles. Your supervisor or
tutor should tell you which are the key texts and relevant journals.
• Abstracting journals, such as APAIS, Psychological Abstracts, Library and Information
Science Abstracts, etc.
• Electronic databases, eg Electronic Reference Library (ERL), First Search, or Expanded
Academic.
Many abstracting journals and electronic databases are available through the University
Library'sResearch Gateway.
A useful reference book for information searches:
Lane, Nancy D 1996. Techniques for Student Research: A Practical Guide. Second edition.
Melbourne: Longman (UC library call number Z 711.2 L36).
Having gathered the relevant details about the literature, you now need to write the review. The
kind of review you write, and the amount of detail, will depend on the level of your studies.
Important note: do not confuse a literature review with an annotated bibliography.
An annotated bibliography deals with each text in turn, describing and evaluating the text, using
one paragraph for each text.
4
In contrast, a literature review synthesises many texts in one paragraph. Each paragraph (or
section if it is a long thesis) of the literature review should classify and evaluate the themes of the
texts that are relevant to your thesis; each paragraph or section of your review should deal with a
different aspect of the literature.
Like all academic writing, a literature review must have an introduction, body, and conclusion.
The introduction should include:
• the nature of the topic under discussion (the topic of your thesis)
• the parameters of the topic (what does it include and exclude)?
• the basis for your selection of the literature
References:
Andersson, B., & Beveridge, A. 2007. A guide to assessments and skills in SCCA (2nd ed.).
[Booklet]. Perth, WA: Edith Cowan University.
Best J.W. and Khan, J.V. 1999. Research in Education (7th ed.).New Delhi: Practice hall of India
Hart, C. (1988). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination.
Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Koul, L. 2000. Methodology of Education Research (3rd ed.). New Delhi: Vikash Publishing House.
5
Kumar R.2006. Research methodology: A step by step guide for beginners.(2nd ed.). New Delhi:
Dorling Kindersley India.
Lamb, S. E. (1998). How to write it: A complete guide to everything you’ll ever write. CA: Ten Speed
Press.