Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
COMES NOW, DWAINE R. CARAWAY, Plaintiff in the above-entitled cause, and files this
Motion to Order Defendant City of Dallas to Produce Material and Motion to Extend Temporary
Restraining Order as permitted under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 680, and in support thereof
I.
On March 7, 2011, Plaintiff filed his Original Petition and Application for Temporary
Restraining Order and Temporary Injunction, complaining of Gregg Abbott, Attorney General of
State of Texas and City of Dallas, On March 8, 2011, Plaintiff filed his First Amended Original
Petition and First Amended Application for Temporary Injunction and Application for Temporary
Injunction.
The Court conducted a hearing on Plaintiff's Application for Temporary lnj unct on on March
8, 2011. After considering the application and argument of counsel, the Court granted a temporary
restraining order, preventing the City of Dallas from releasing or disclosing the material at issue to
the public.
After the hearing, Plaintiff's counsel contacted Mr. Perkins, City Attorney for the City of
Dallas, and requested a copy of the material at issue. Counsel made arrangements to meet to discuss
the release of the material at issue. Said meeting took place on March 9, 2011, at which time, Mr.
Perkins stated that he believed that the restraining order prevented him from providing a copy of the
material at issue to Plaintiffs counsel. Mr. Perkins agreed to provide a formal response to Plaintiff's
On March 10, 2011, Plaintiffs counsel received a written response from the City Attorney,
wherein he stated that because of the pending temporary restraining order he was unable to release
a copy of the requested disc to Plaintiffs counsel. A true and correct copy of the City Attorney's
II.
Plaintiff will be highly prejudiced if he is not permitted to have access to material at issue,
as such is necessary for Plaintiffs counsel to properly and adequately prepare for the injunction
hearing currently scheduled for March 22, 2011. As such, Plaintiff has no other remedy but to ask
for an extension of the Temporary Restraining Order. As evidenced by Exhibit "A", the City
Attorney is not opposed to producing a copy of the material at issue to Plaintiff's counsel, but
believes doing so without a Court Order, could be in violation of the existing Temporary Restraining
Order.
As such Plaintiff prays that the Court conduct a hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Order
Defendant City of Dallas to Produce Material and issue an Order, allowing City of Dallas to release
the material at issue to Plaintiff's counsel. By seeking this Order, Plaintiff does not intend to make
the material at issue subject to disclosure to any other person or entity and as such, is requesting that
I.
As stated above, Defendant City of Dallas has refrained from voluntarily producing a copy
of the material at issue to Plaintiff's counsel, stating that doing so could be in violation of the Court's
Plaintiff has asked the Court to issue an Order permitting the limited release of the material
at issue to Plaintiff's counsel's so that Plaintiff's counsel can adequately prepare for the inunction
hearing. Plaintiff believes that the Court will issue such an Order and that the material at issue will
be produced to Plaintiff's counsel. However, such and Order cannot he issued before March 22,
As such, Plaintiff prays that Court extend the Temporary Restraining Order as permitted
under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 680 for an additional fourteen (14) days (until April 5,2011),
and reset the hearing on Plaintiffs Amended Application for Temporary Injunction to that date.
Plaintiff will be highly prejudiced if his counsel is not afforded adequate time after receiving
a copy of the material at issue, to prepare for the temporary injunction hearing.
PRAYER
issue and Order extending the Temporary Restraining Order for fourteen (14) days from March 22,
2011, and thereafter reset the hearing on Plaintiffs Amended Application for Temporary Injunction
to that same date. Plaintiff further request such other relief to which he may show himself to be
Respectfully Submitted,
By:
MICHAEL D. PAVIAIA
State Bar No.: 00790560
SAMMIE M. SMITH
State Bar No.: 24044902
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
I hereby certify that I personally spoke with Mr. Thomas Perkins, City Attorney for City of
Dallas in order ro reach an agreement on the merits of this Motion. After a detailed conversation,
Mr. Perkins stated that he had "no position" as to this motion] s such a hearing is necessary.
MICHAEL D. PAY^IMA
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I here by certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document has been forwarded
to the following by the method indicated on this the 11 TH of Matz-c , 2011.
MICHAEL D. PAYMA
FIAT
The above and foregoing Motion filed by Movant, having been presented to me and the Court
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that said Motion be, and same is hereby set for hearing
SIGNED on , 2011.
JUDGE PRESIDING