Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Edgar M. Jaimes Moreno, Jesus Alvarez, Omar Lengerke, Max Suell Dutra, Armando C. de P. Filho
Manuscript received July 29, 2009. This work was supported in part by the
Autonomous University of Bucaramanga, Colombia.
E. M. Jaimes Moreno Autonomous University of Bucaramanga, Colombia.
E-mail: emjaimes@unab.edu.co. Fig. 1. Mechatronic design scheme.
O. Lengerke, Autonomous University of Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Mechatronic Systems & Robotics Research Group – COPPE/UFRJ – Rio de
Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, E-mail: olengerke@ufrj.br. Hydraulic press is a tool that has as its purpose to achieve
M.S. Dutra, Mechatronic Systems & Robotics Research Group – the permanent deformation or even to cut or to assemble a
COPPE/UFRJ Postal Box 68.503 – CEP 21.945-970 – Rio de Janeiro, RJ, specific material, by means of application of a load [10]. One
Brazil, E-mail: max@mecanica.coppe.ufrj.br.
2&CIMK_07 2
of the causes that has made possible the production and homocinetic axle. This problem occurred because the valve
popularity of many objects of daily and deluxe use is the for control of traction and compression was of closed center
growing application of presses to mass production. One of the type, forcing the system to release the pressure through the
most remarkable examples of this application is the relief valve (Fig. 3). The valve constantly open produced
development of the automotive industry production. constant friction between the fluid and the valve, causing
Currently, the presses are substituting others machines for overheating [11].
mass production.
Hydraulic presses are produced in several types and sizes,
and can be provided of almost unlimited capacity. The use of
hydraulic cylinders allows the application of forces in several
points.
A. Press Operation - Analysis
The Barmag hydraulic Press is a device belonging to
homocinetic axles production line. Due to its importance in
the process, it is necessary to make adjustments, changing the
original electro-mechanic control system, for a new automatic
control system implemented in this project. In the course of
the first programmed days of test, the problems that occurred
were analyzed and an appropriate study for corrections and
implementation of the control system was carried out.
1) Hydraulic System: the analysis began at 8:00 until a
failure was detected in the pressure of compression and
traction test. We noticed that the reading in the pressure
began to vary critically approximately five hours after having Fig. 3. Hydraulic system project previous.
put the system into press operation (Fig. 2).
2) Traction Test (Axle Disassembly): we observed that the
COMPRESSION absence of a system would detect the moment that the tulip
N
9300
disassembles the intermediate shaft. In some cases, it was not
9200 easy to notice that the snap ring disadjustment of intermediate
9100 shaft.
9000 3) Position work initiation: by means of the analysis
8900 obtained during days of test, we noticed the absence of an
8800
initial position of work, what allowed that each axle to be
8700
tested from different positions, changing the measurement
8600
08:00 09:12 10:24 11:36 12:48 parameters.
Time (hours) 4) Anchorage Devices: in the moment of the homocinetic
TRACTION axle test, a control failure was evident on the anchorage
N
12400
device, allowing to realize the test without assuring the parts,
12350 what represents a danger for the operator.
12300 5) Control System: when the previous control system was
12250 revised, we found several failures to control this process
12200
12150
appropriately. The system did not perform cycle in an
12100 automatic method, allowing the operator to work the press in
12050 a position without control.
12000
08:00 09:12 10:24 11:36 12:48 B. Solution
Time (hours)
Fig. 2. Compression and traction measurements.
In order to analyze the available proposals, we took into
consideration very important production factors for the
industry, such as: the work should be carried out online,
Analyzing this phenomenon, we verified that the problem
allowing that the press to be used by homocinetic line in the
in hydraulic system was an overheating in the hydraulic fluid
production of axles without inconveniences, and the press
(Rando oil 68), which produces loss of viscosity, allowing
performance was analyzed to detect possible future problems
leakage through the piston seals and valves, with considerable
in the systems. The solution is the implementation of a
waste of pressure, for compression test performed in
programmable logic controller (PLC), because this device
2&CIMK_07 3
represents a quick, flexible, economic, and efficient side [14]. When we introduce a metallic part in the magnetic
alternative [12]. field, currents of Foucault that influence the oscillator take
The automation of machinery and industrial process should place and they generate a weakening of the oscillatory circuit.
contemplate all the possible states. It should not only be As consequence, a decrease of the oscillations amplitude takes
contemplated in the program the normal operation, but the place. A circuit detects this variation of amplitude and
failure situations, emergency stop, processes of rearms and determines a commutation on signal given by the sensor (Fig.
setting in march of schemes and manual control. All PLC 6).
program should contemplate these cases, with the objective of
reducing to the minimum the time of stopping of machinery
and to perform the restart process and changes in operation
mode, for example to pass of manual control to automatic
control.
The GEMMA (Guide d`Etude des Modes de Marches et
d`Arrêts), Design Guide for Start and Stop Modes, is an
organized representation in all the modes or state in that the
production process can be automated [13]. GEMMA also
represents the state part control is out of service, i.e., the
system is without supply or stopped. GEMMA was developed
for the project application (Fig. 4), detailing all the possible
stops that can occur during a work shift, as well as the normal
process of press operation.
Resonant
circuit LC Comparison
and and
oscillator Commutation
HF
TABLE I
Force 1000 (5) PARAMETERS OBTAINED FOR THE MOVEMENTS OF THE PRESS
Pc 13.99 Kgf /cm 2
Surface *(R 2 r 2 )
Time Force Stroke Pressure caudal
Movement
(s) (Kgf) (mm) (Kgf/cm2) (liters/min)
1350 Compression 10 1000 250 14 12
Pt 17.19 Kgf /cm2 (6) In rest 0.5 1000 0 14 0
*52 Traction 20 1350 500 18 12
In rest 0.5 1350 0 18 0
The pump will be able to resist the pressure of 17.19 Total 41 18 12
kgf/cm2, so that a pump of 20 kgf/cm2 should be used. For
caudal, the cylinder annular area is R 2 -r 2 =71.47cm 2 ,
E. Automation Process and Adaptation of the Barmag Press
each centimeter for compression will require 71.47cm 2 of
fluid. Thus, to move 250 mm, 71.47cm2 were needed by 25 The bypass using a valve 2/2 normally open allows a
cm = 1.79 liters. This displacement occurred in 10 seconds, communication with tank when the press is not carrying out
what indicates that the pump will give a minimum flow of 2 the cycle test, closing during the process test (Fig. 7). This is
liters in 10 seconds, or 12 liters per minute. For displacement the implemented solution, since it avoided the overheating
500 mm in 20 seconds, the cylinder area is and did not present failure of pressure in the circuit.
* R2 78.54cm2 . Necessary volume to accomplish this We preferred the implementation of an inductive sensor,
travel will be * R 2 78.54cm2 *50cm 3.93liters . As this positioned in the inferior block of the press (Fig. 8), and its
volume is needed in 20 seconds, in one minute the pump will programmed time to send signal to a visual help installed in
give 11.79liters min 12liters min . The necessary flow in the the control panel, which indicates to the operator that the axel
pump for the pressure and traction is the same, consequently is not well-assembled. For the implementation of the
it is not necessary to put flow constrains in none of the inductive sensor we chose reference Siemens 3RG40 22-
phases. 0KB00, which has a normally open contact, operation
The pump used an electric motor of 1300 rpm; the distance of 4 mm, since this is a wise distance to protect the
cylinder capacity of the pump is given by (7).
2&CIMK_07 5
sensor against collisions, with an operation voltage range of reference LOGO! 230 RC6ED1053–1FB00–0BA2 with power
20-265 VAC. supply 115–230 VAC, twelve digital input 115-230 VAC,
eight output 10 Amperes is selected. For the PLC
programming, the software LOGO Soft de Siemens is used.
of the safety line, it proceeds to carry out the assembly and performed a function of ideal safety in assembly, due to its
compression test, where the program provides the service priority to begin the test cycle. With the beginning work
letters necessary for suitable assembly, which has two position, the press always will work with the same point of
programmed alarms, indicating if the press reaches the reference, what indicates that it also will work with the same
maximum and minimum. If these values are reached, the parameters of calibration. With the installed visual help that
press continues working, otherwise, the press will not was programmed to indicate the operator if the
continue the process of traction test accomplishment of traction test was satisfactory or not, the
When the traction test is carried out, as in the operator wasted less time in reviewing the homocinetic axle
compression test, a force established by the appropriate
service letters for a error test or satisfactory assembly, which
has two programmed alarms, indicates if the press exceeds
the maximum or does not reach the minimal pressure. If the
maximum exceeds the disassembly sensor, it sends a signal
producing the intermittent ignition of a light that is on
control panel, and the press will not continue its work cycle.
If the force is in the necessary range, it means that the
assembly, the traction test and the compression test are
correct. After the press comes back to its standard beginning
position and the press does not anchor the axle, the operator
proceeds to withdraw the axle from its homocinetic axle.
LOGO
Figures 11 and 12 present the general process scheme of test
and assembly of homocinetic axle.
REFERENCES
[1] R. H. Bishop, The Mechatronics Handbook, CRC Press, New York.
2002.
[2] J. V. Amerongen, “Mechatronic design,” Mechatronics, vol. 13, issue 10,
2003, pp. 1045-1066.
[3] O. Lengerke, C. V. Martinez, M.S. Dutra, M.J.M. Tavera, F. L. E. Silva,
“Mechatronics Design Of A Low-Cost Packaging And Dosing Machine
For Doughy Products,” Brazilian Society of Mechanical Science and
Engineering. ABCM Symposium Series in Mechatronics. Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil, vol. 3, 2008, pp. 717-725.
[4] H.L Stewart, Hydraulic and Pneumatic Power for Production, Industrial
Press, Inc., Fourth Edition, New York, USA, 1977.
Fig. 11. Barmag press. [5] L. W. Mays, Hydraulic Design Handbook, McGraw-Hill, USA, 1999.
[6] J. A. Ferreira, P. Sun, J. J. Grácio, “Design and Control of a Hydraulic
Press”, IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, 2006, pp.
814–819.
IV. CONCLUSION [7] P. Sun, J.J. Grácio, J.A. Ferreira, “Control System of a Mini Hydraulic
Press for Evaluating Springback in Sheet Metal Forming,” Journal of
With the implementation of the valve on hydraulic circuit, Materials Processing Technology, vol. 176, issues 1-3, 2006, pp. 55-61.
the overheating and pressure loss of compression were [8] D. H. Stamatis, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA from Theory to
Execution, Second Edition, ASQ Quality Press, USA, 2003.
avoided, achieving a few parameters of standard test for all [9] C.F. Eubanks, S. Kmenta, K. Ishii, “System Behavior Modeling as a Basis
homocinetic axles. With the adjustment of the new control for Advanced Failure Modes and Effects Analysis,” in Proceedings of the
system for the Barmag Press, the production of assembly of 1996 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers
in Engineering Conference, Irvine, California, 1996, pp. 1-8.
homocinetic axles increased, avoiding time of rework and
manual review by the operator. The press anchorage system
2&CIMK_07 7
[10] J.A. Ferreira, P. Sun, J.J. Grácio, “Close Loop Control of a Hydraulic
Press for Springback Analysis,” Journal of Materials Processing
Technology, vol. 177, issues 1-3, 2006, pp. 377-381.
[11] G.K. Adam, 2004, “Design and Control of A Mechatronic Hydraulic Press
System,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on
Mechatronics, 2004. pp. 311–315.
[12] K.T. Erickson, “Programmable Logic Controllers”, IEEE Potentials, vol.
15, issue 1, 1996, pp. 14–17.
[13] G. Cloutier, J.J. Paques, “GEMMA, the Complementary Tool of the
GRAFCET,” in Conference Proceedings Programmable Control and
Automation Technology Conference and Exhibition, Fourth Annual
Canadian, 1988, pp. 12A1-5/1-10.
[14] J. S. Wilson, Sensor Technology Handbook, Newnes Elsevier, USA,
2005.
[15] W. Boyes, Instrumentation Reference Book, Butterworth-Heinemann,
Third Edition, 2002.
[16] J.G. Webster, The Measurement Instrumentation and Sensors Handbook,
CRC Press, 1998.