genre

1Cambridge
loveday
Jesus
Matthew
Thomas
saying
What
in
like.
points
MatthewÕs
philosopher,
moral
messenger
for
he
given
few.
far
able
his
to
stones
burn
TheWhat
the
is
them,
cultural
removed
companions,
story
iscriticism
The
to
you
said
Simon
Peter
(faithful
not
an
iscommunicate
said
what
gnostic
of
culturalworld
and
alexander
asaid
insight
only
If
up.Õ
aCollections
gospel?
comparison
sent
ÔlikeÕ
encapsulates
toIfrom
cast
gospel?
Peter
to
you
and
atotell
analogies.
his
trouble
him:
Gospel
kind
direct
him:
are
Matthew
to
they
them
ofanyone
into
human
disciples:
said
In
you
the
Master,
like.
of
it
You
many
in
uses
of
asked
atOnline
of
from
the
is,
intellectual
Law)
categories
to
one
neatly
gospels.
both
the
For
else.
me,
are
Thomas:
him:
Gospel
ways
hidden
the
anyone
God.
him,
of
mytake
two
Bible,
him,
and
©some
Make
like
categories
And
secret
the
Cambridge
You
mouth
the
intersecting
supernatural:
But
aWhat
There
offire
Make
Jesus
wisdom
else:
ameof
the
ThomasÕs
of
words
are
question
invoking
man
holy
Thomas
aare
will
gnoøsis
understanding,
did
mewill
question
the
comparison,
like
is
ÔNow
who
that
aUniversity
of
man,
Jesus
not
sui
dilemmas
those
13come
comparison,
resists
reward
ishe
echoes
athe
when
cultural
Jesus
righteous
aat
model
Jesus
generis,
awho
at
say
Greek
guru.
gains
said
wise
all
Thomas
forth
its
is
tell
the
whispers
to
ofPress,
of
is
that
stress
becontemporary
tophilosopher.
face
worlds
world:
PeterÕs
is
you?
one
tell
aholiness
temptation
he
from
mehe
angel.
capable
be
came
me,
righteous
so
istheir
2007
what
posed
value.
taken
Thomas
meback
to
extraordinary,
will
you
the
ofanswer
Jesus
simply
what
the
IJewish
of
the
that
will
stones
bysaid
aside
never
amchosen
They
toishimself;
angel,
IJesus
gospels.
belongs
is
look
take
aamand
look
be
atup
characte
aso
once
for
their of
r,
increasing
world
13 continuity
thenumbers)
Greekswithand
whobiblical
want tonarrative
Romans, locate
and whotheir
therefore
patterns.
comparisons
look
Thereforinareanalogies
the
those
cultural
(into
of communication
Cambridge
14
the
any
ThomasÕs
Loveday
gospels
uniqueness
comparisons
fate
Collections
Alexander
inofof
Greek
atwith
achieving
the
allliterature.
Online
gospels,
the
withrest
understanding
other
© of
Cambridge
their
And
literary
the there
sui
world;
University
generis
at are
genres.
the
forthose,
cost
character,
if This
Press,
the
oflike
means
cutting
gospel
2007
Thomas,
andthat
isoff
refuse
tothey
who
channels
communicate
stress
torisk
make
,it virtually
charmed
may
need
to
how
what
The
definition1)
in
gospel
John.2
we
All
length,
world
the
Christ,
later
characters,
And
their
pericope
that
of must
ask
common,
are
beis,
they
four
person
the
the
to
are
an
(Luke
Christian
grammatical
risky,
what
in
In
to
find
circle
make
about
the
focus
unusually
gospels
work.
canonical
New
or
the
four
generic
arrive
soindividual
ofshape
alone
Son
ÔGospelÕ
some
an
gospels?
have
Testament
main
every
itforms:
much
the
Jesus.
onoftexts
And
attempt
ofisnarrative
are
at
Jesus
cultural
the
they
many
terms,
amount
adds
high
subject.3
that
gospels
so
GodÕ
episode.
asurely
like
MarkÕs
(euangelion,
already
that
the
working
retain
are,
individual
agospels
is
proportion
episode.
tosecond
is
(Mk
itmuch
that
Ðtheir
gospel
common
the
understand
where
(which
that
what
is
opening,
1.1)
The
before
Where
the
convinced.
internal
would
right
this
are
more
volume).
proportion
In
is,
they
we
traditional
according
seems
title
Iground
characteristics.
Ôgood
of
he
prose
the
begin.
use
common
fit
than
place
what
ÔThe
verbs
is
them
are
definition
to
ÔActsÕ
ÔministryÕ
passion
here
into
newsÕ)
not
with
But
narratives
All
skin-deep.
literary
about,
beginning
betothe
core
in
is even
as
atitles
are
paradigmatic
those
start.
their
Matthew,
for
all
even
single
Ðfor
the
that
subject
how
focused
Jesus
though
of
stories
the
section
genres
But
stories
higher
outside
own
basis
present
of
Richard
Before
they
we
gospel
scroll
gospels
they
Mark,
monograph
the
is
terms.
need
ofThomasÕs
intensively
they
are
for
in
at
of
the
gospel
focused
the
the
we
also
them
as
Burridge
Luke
to
in
this
apostles
the
MarkÕs
aput
have
narrative
can
resemble
aWe
action,
working
analyse,
the
have
as
genre.
level
solution
need
together,
and
of
respect;
begin
on
Jesus
one
ancient
gospel
onJesus.
Jesus
notes
much
and
ofsubject
heÐas
tois
ifweÐask
other
the its
there
the
in
(Mk
chief
to6.14Ð29).
account
object,
is
bridge
onlyofaThus
increasingly
one
HerodÕs
gap episode
where
in structural
execution
Jesus
where
so during
and
Jesus
ofhis
terms,John
the
isdisciples
Jesus
passion
completely
the Baptist,
comes
narrative.
are Ôoff-stageÕ
across
temporarily
a narrative
asInthe MarkÕs
and
separated
filler
hero
thatgospel,
ofput
is
Cambridge
What
presence
In
are
private
Lk
for
in
available
This
time
Pilate
ancient
(Matt
of
his
more
and
with
gives
public
episodic
time-notes
history
The
ministry
life
Matthew
about
the
common).
told
John
to proceed.
this
report
10.18Ð22).
general,
Empire
the
core
Herod
gospels.
relatively
the
south
narrative
chronological.
shape
names
ishis
story
and
aexplicit
at
without
(with
28.20).
JesusÕ
story
provide
minimum
stage
story.5
aStructurally,
sense,
thoughts
more
Mediterranean
with
most,
and
gospel
of
place.
but
in
Collections
gospel?
episode
the
to
(Matt
providing
childhood
ofisLuke,
are
which
When
athe
Although
private
public
age
as
continuous.
the
aJesusÕ
inner
Peter,
linked
LukeÕs
(2.1Ð2;
in
roughly
and
Jesus
the
of
few
real
birth
The
astory
disciples
core
In
2.1Ð18),
an
the
are
Acts.
as
story
all
15story
whole
illustrates
geographical
culminating
have
points
MarkÕs
barest
But
itinerant
and
psychological
view.4
both
Ôaround
date
(and
parents
disciples
can
externalized
James
moments
gospel
in
horizons
narrative
four
Online
to
the
world.
3.1Ð2)
chronological
John
the
far
is
birth
then,
but
specific
ancanonical
scarcely
aand
Individual
(Lk
the
itself
asbetween:
evangelists
where
version,
anchor-points
broadly
and
political
core
unusually
of
narratives
adds
thirtyÕ
and
©in
observers
in
Matthew
Ðends
preacher.
3.1Ð2).
stories,
two
we
another
look
Cambridge
virtually
aJohn
and
or
they
JesusÕ
gospel
the
could
falls
but
framework
more
his
birth
bechronological
states
as
with
abiographical,
Jesus
Galilee
west,
sometimes
at
episodes
only
sequence
place
family
gospels
said
claim
overheard
not
extends
and
trial
high
important
speak
internal
and
say
into
isinLuke
life
aconcern
narrative
the
From
narratives,
University
every
are
of
detailed
vision
ato
somehow
to
neither
of
that
degree:
the
chronological
which
point
and
history,
two
ashis
their
(Mk
Rome,
this
begin)
apart,
have
the
are
covering
function
anchors
individual
omniscient
privilege
soliloquies
public
Jerusalem,
geography
precision,
death.
the
uneven
structural
1.36;
of
tracing
storyÕs
becomes
seems
information.
where
point
loosely
birth,
anecessary
characters.
fashion
with
has
hewhereas
worldwide
though
story
isPress,
there
ÔprivateÕ
ison,
5.37;
events,
his
three
Only
much
somehow
parts:
ashave
the
to
hethe
the
and
horizons
framework
progressively
linked,
of
episode.
is
narrators,
select
to
Herod
both
be
emerges
story
they
2007
feature.
(e.g.
consciousness
the
two
information
for
omniscience
9.2;
heroÕs
years
Jesus
the
centre
anothing
history
mission
able
little
JesusÕ
existence
Occasionally,
theoretically
Lk
essential
particular
geographical
narrative
of
agree
the
and
into
baptism
Jncan
witnesses
14.33).
3.23
but
east
to
on
of
the
for
public
not
The
narrative
12.27Ð29;
Pontius
else
ministry
there
of
subsist
to
precise
world
his
in
gospels,
be only
report.
in
the
by
But
is
in
Cambridge
16
(based
(many
parables,
material
Mark
and
too
teaching
LukeÕs
both
core
that
the
Caesarea
increase
are
evangelists
overall
Things
four
of
to
highly
progressively
his
have
details
with
tomb
in
The
varied
Our
loose-knit,
holy
ending
there
work,
Loveday
anarrative
which
aministry
firm
structured
disciples
connected
death.
narrative
first
(though
to
gospel
loose
gospels,
third
prepared
his
after
man
but
distinctive
is
and
inmay
description
are
dramatic
experiences
with
doone
construction
avary:
(chs.
Philippi
in
death.
the
called
Collections
Galilee),
not
sayings,
definition,
that
Alexander
distinction
and
framework
very
in
Throughout
his
narrative.
hostility
felt
vary).
episodic
discrete
isfocus
they
space
resurrected
more
all
near
to
Mark
moves
the
Matthew
4,
around
to
death
isnarrated
different
presentation
All
Jesus,
this
free
miraculous),
arrange
type
7,
teachÕ
(Mk
last
reader
fact
the
discourses.
Ðthe
and
And
of
and
from
have
has
13);
is
aof
narrative
and
aOnline
his
8.27Ð30
as
outline
to
the
sorrow,
then,
fact
and
of
between
Finding
beginning,
week
quarter
John.
all
culminating
that
the
didactic
difficult.
their
now
via
(Acts
the
exercise
active
for
descriptions
finding
Jesus
varied
itthat
meditative
and
first
when
narratives,
Luke
the
events
of
moved
could
has
a©disbelief
differently);
narrative
Here
of
this
many
and
in
narratives.
Cambridge
loose-knit
combined
The
action
a1.1)
we
JesusÕ
of
gospels
appears
relating
share
volume
to
areports
there
orfundamental
amore
it
and
aparallels),
get
the
series
final
from
be
leading
amounts
of
All
flexible
passive
intheological
is
certain
empty,
discourse.
something
aJesus
and
the
precise
mark
to
life
whole
pace
prediction
of
his
are
aasof
the
progresses.
agree
towith
lot
scene
and
the
University
fair
the
of
his
series
teaching:
ÔactionÕ
an
his
trial
four
upwords
John
synoptic
some
occupies
slows
mode
and
resurrection
ofto
manner
amount
book
linked
joy.
samples
account
passion
that
disciples
toof
summary
narrative
and
(though
friends
impact
arrangements
teaching
all
like
has
But
point
kind
until
his
and
his
of
in
down
and
inexcept
JesusÕ
and
them:
stories
But
which
of
scenes
Press,
anecdotes
fewer
it
even
agospels
Luke
associates
this:
death
death
of
all
narratives.
dramatic
on
(e.g.
of
individual
disproportionate
in
the
dramatic
and
deeds
isfour
individual
and
his
which
Ôall
structure
turning-point
appearances.
the
Mark
the
there
suggests
and
an
story
episodes
artificial
final
Mark
atalks
in
2007
(in
in
friends
teaching:
Mk
put
intense
gospel
of
way
that
content
Matthew,
which
Jerusalem,
accounts
ofaand
is
has
all
anticipation
Jerusalem).
teaching
3.1Ð6).
is
does
add
moment
with
the
JesusÕ
not
licence
In
Galilean
some
four
Jesus
awithin
episodes
that
overall
Jesus
personal
visiting
stories
their
is
call
noticeable
all
and
not
gospels
inof
to
of
them.6
And
atof
aup
gospels
So
the
amount
actions
draw
began
the
end
and
of his
in the
Thegospel
Cambridge
What
but
more
distinct
location,
events,
seems
making
points.
episodes,
(as
gospel,
literary
had
know
them,
individuation.
Many
literature
analysis
construction
folklore,Õ
narrators
moreÕ.
or
the
beauty
in
ÔreservedÕ
withtheir
the
also
three
well
same
no
individual
gospels
hero
reader
iswith
or
each
of
only
toof
much
contact
narrative
Descriptive
action:
ajumps
less
particularly
John
recognized
the
series
large
episodes,
be
as
phenomenon
of
surroundings
Collections
gospel?
ÔsynopticsÕ,
or
so
other,
and
the
narrative.
scant
its
he
use
is
flexible:
adifference
that
as
features
the
athe
takes
that
of
distinct
suggests,
their
landscape.Õ
given
degrees
different
with
gospels
peculiar
oral
ÔForest,
over
of
ofstructures
Russian
folk
notation:
same
of
the
17details
his
spatial
events,
recognizably
more
and
the
in
each
traditional
audiences
or
no
indo
differences
we
narrative
Mark
Online
words.
episodes
gospel
ofriver,
Matthew,
to
chronology),
valued
its
must
crosses
information
the
liberties
synoptics.
combination
have
wonder-tale,
Ôthe
audience,
other,
not
variety.7
Athe
Allan
description
ÒJerusalem,Ó
with
own
about
first
also
of
similar
©Ôare
At
ends
observed
story
form
story;
byCambridge
can
right.
the
differs
sea,
them,
large
Mark
other
the
Powell,
are
take
the
with
up
part
ordescriptive
be
Whatever
folktale.
is
interested
about
Sometimes
same
though
similarities
of
steppes,
and
teaching
with
church
remarkable.
notes
outward
but
degrees
atimes,
arranged
If
account
told
in
the
fluidity
from
of
Òadifferent
for
University
Luke)
kind
gospel
the
such
aJesusÕ
the
mountain,Ó
order
athe
only
quite
way
from
that
example,
they
writers
Vladimir
number
appearance
city
narrator
gospels:
all
can
of
only
story
places
tell
in
overall
weof
and
narrative
for
economy
overlap
story,
and
early
are
Either
the
four
will
punchline.
different
be
distinct
wall,
look
in
Press,
fixity,
of
the
unless
inserted
selection
of
remarkable:
relationship
notes
Òthe
that
Propp,
the
is
ÔSpatial
(more
narrate
shape
on,
ways
same
but
his
at
the
way,
literary
sake
of
etc.,
can
and
indifferent
can
action
temple.Ó
is
2007
narrative
it,
is
they
the
with
Galilean
ways
four
coherence
in
be
repetition,
commonly
episode
The
is
any
in
of
not
aatsettings
be
are
similar
of
the
which
characters
observed
remarkably
essentially
significant
his
the
play
amentioned
order
without
different
gospels
if
analysis
paralleled
novel.8
and
directly
individual
between
different
fourfold
they
events.Õ
inand
ministry,
texture
the
anothing
to but
of
role
the
are
did
ÔIn
ofpresented
releva
when
Folk
to the plot.Õ Similarly, Ôthere is a paucity of sensory data. If the gospels
nt
action
Cambridge
18
were
Òwaves
dry
not
As
imagination.Õ9
to
with
outside
surrounds
of
we Loveday
ain
action
have
sand
tomore
remarkable
the
the
lapping
be
inthe
already
trod
movement
Collections
like
found.
gospels,
do
the
Alexander
narrative.Õ10
not
underfoot
hero
folktale
modern
atdegree
noticed
Textures,
exist
the
ofthethe
at Online
novels
shore
the
narrative
on
in
is
inhero,
the
This
moment
different
essentially
the
sounds,
Mk
ofwe
©6.1ff.).
hero:
Cambridge
the
Judean
and
narrative
would
structure
of Sea
smells,
what
ÔAction
action
places
probably
desert.Ó
public:
oflies
And, University
focus
GalileeÓ
and
of
means
simultaneouslyÕ
isoutside
as the
ÔAction
read
Such
tastes
performed
on
in that
folktale
theand
Press,
about
luxury
this
are
Ôempirical
Ôin
gospels,
is
thealways
infolklore
the
usually
movement
2007
feel
of
is
(a
accordance
sound
narration
focused
phenomenon
ofspaceÕ
performed
left
Òcoarse,
lies
two
of theatres
tothat
isphysical
our
ly,role
interrelations,
folklore.Õ11
are
encounters
interacts,
The
defined:
those
the
afor
and
reason
central,
opponents,
ProppÕs
one
defined
film-makers
structure
cycle,
in
traditional
of space.
psychological
athe
nofolk
result
narrative.
the
only
because
persons
facilities
in
folklore
which
Russian
sake
distinction
by
inhero
and
Psychological
the
can
between
and
of
his
the
terms
almost
and
cycle
FolkloreÕs
of
around
exemplifies
the
who
narrative
beitfantasists.
Folklore
helpers,
history
wonder-tale.
located
awith
tends
isolation.
readily
toall
is
exceptional
contribute
milieu
ofthe
him
between
dialogues,
depict
through
their
encounter
tosecurely
hero
our
of
novels
preoccupation
does
and
ororthe
have
illustrated
many
actions
those
assumptions
aand
there
his
the
The
At
these
to
not
dynamic
society
only
literary
of
based
the
tales,
explanations,
hero
action
the
actions
folktale
contrast
if
deal
whom
the
are
public
do
one
core
imprecisely
groups
development
onbuilding
as
from
structural
quality
.with
no
they
he
proceeds
protagonist.
about
novel
.athe
are
of
extra
saves.12
and
between
romantic
.interactions
the
Ôempirical
or
persons
interest
the
complexity
In
grouped
the
Ðhow
and
individuals
of
popular
folklore
characters.
including
Robin
up
inthrough
of
features
action
literary
to
the
asowho
time
figure
the
the
One
other
tell
fluid
on,
two
Hood
spaceÕ
English
ofcharacter
that
plot
are
(King
aPropp
is
everyone
listener.
adobut
the
types
human
pursuing
series
with
people,
novel
story
that
introduced
All
story
not
his
figure
means
assumptions
John)
Robin
coherent
whom
will
of
describes
occur
personality
only
is
lies
ofnarrative
is
are
For
is
his
that
his
ain
and
heahelpful
assigned
act,
Hoodinpicture
this
destiny
there
of is
beginning
Cambridge
What
space
to
band
the
earliest
with
and
individual
help
implacable
Sheriff
Little
is(Sherwood
of
Ôhisasurviving
the
followers
Collections
gospel?
opponents,
(encounter
John,Õ
episodes
poorÕ),
of enemies
Nottingham).
Forest).
19literary
(Little
ÔRobin
and
inhis
with
Online
who
the
aHood
HeLittle
helpers,
strong
John,
finally
cycle
has
His
record,
©and
Cambridge
his
Maid
story
popular
are
John),
orbring
Friar
trademark
through
Marian,
those
unclear
isothers
TuckÕ.
University
support
about
told,
whom
aÐMuch
activity
disconnected
his
in
The
some
at
hebase.13
the
downfall
savesÕ:
connections
Press,
naturally
MillerÕs
ballads
end
(Ôrobbing
He(stories
2007
series
ÔRobin
hascome
(Kingthat
Son),
between
his
the
John,
of
Hood
make
near
of
faithful
rich
and
encounters
the
the
upoutlawÕs
the the
last
to
central
mode
family
film
GibsonÕs
It
the
death)
produce
is
Crusader
gospel
two
of
tradition
not
Ðnarration:
history,
character
but
centuries,
Robin
too
antheme
tradition.
for
overarching
difficult
then
acquires
links
most
with
psychological
of
novelists
takes
ofprecisely
with
earlier
Gospel
athem,
to narrative
on
Saracen
ÔrealÕ
parallel
anretellings.
films
and
the
intertextual
the
depth,
film-makers
social
companion
sequence
and
offeatures
thisthe
Ôlife
romantic
andRobin
process
isof
who
political
life
have
modern
not
completely
JesusÕ
Hood
interest,
in
ofmade
important.
the
readers
its
story,
history.
novels
numerous
development
owndeconstructs
genealogy
providing
Ðmiss
Over
create
asThis
attempts
inthe
when
ofaliterary
this
and
the
Mel
metanarrative
and
background
be
the
temptation
gospel
essentially
which
seen
needtries
shape
intostories,
detail
embryo
tocomes
supply
fluid,
supply
that
inJesus
into
episodic
athe
the
rare
isbeing
gospels
with
kind
lacking
example
cycle
aofmiraculous
by themselves.
imposing
psychological
in
ofoftraditional
the
a private
canonical
order
birth,
Matthew
information
spiritual
and
units
agospels.
family
sequence
andwhich
Luke
conflict.
history,
orhave
This
onalready
anprocess
a life
and,
The feel
written
canthei
in
of the
rown,weboth
As
obvious have
sequencing
before
seen, narrative
andofafter
the passion
they arenarratives)
sequences taken
withinupthe into
aregospels
the literary
treated (apart
as essentially
tradition.
from the provisi
andseries
onal,
But
strong
gospels.
aoral
The
savesÕ.
written,
can
the
totality
cycle
character
befluidity
core
Itwhich
of readily
isof
encounters
gospel
not
the
ofand
builds
abandoned
simply
tradition
its
gospel
fixity,
with
own,
up atradition,
aÔhis
random
and
which
vital
lying
thusre-formed
opponents,
imposes
series
and
exemplifies
behind
with
coherent
ofits
byhis
these
recollections
successive
own
duality
many
picture
helpers,
varied
rhythms
of the
between
literary
of
writers.
or onthose
but
the
features
the
a structured
hero
oralforms
written
whom
through
and
of has a
he
oral
Cambridge
20
traditional
aand
Dibelius.
have
of
most
literatureÕ,
the
Finland.14
as major
Loveday
gospel
aoral
oral
study
existence
great
significant
series influence
tradition
traditional
Collections
studies
Such
of
Alexander
potential
Lord
literature
of
which
contemporary
ofunconnected
cross-cultural
points
aisin
since
on
draws
connected
Albert
literature
the
ain
Online
asallowing
variety
out
the
pioneers
on
described
oral
LordÕs
that
units.
beginning
insights
©analogies
narrative,
Cambridge
of
epic
has
oral
usThe
ofpoetry
cultures
1978bytradition
been
to form
gained
ofstudy
individual
Propp
articulate
ahave
University
important
the
criticism
cycle
outside
from
byof
andshould
twentieth
obvious
Homeric
ÔThe
Yugoslavia,
of
others.
episodes
and
insuch
the
tales
Press,
pitfalls,
gospels
the
analyse
not
century,
Bible.
scholars
The
as
related
development
be
presuppose
2007
Gunkel
Turkey
study
as
thought
the
One
but
and
oral
from
toof
dynamics
ofawas
they
and the
traditional
offolklore
particular
also
simply
traditional
biography.
audience
is
death:
individual:
rarely Ôthe
astold
Such
ÔIfinathe
narratives,
well
separateasthe
tradition
gospels,
ofelements
form
stories
theyofpresupposes
all
must
atold.Õ15
or single,
orbelong
incidents
any unidirectional
oftoin
the
As them,
with
a the
existence
tradition
Robin
inlife
whole
ofof
Hood,
narrative
ofboth
ororal
the this
inhero
tellers
part,
life
Ôlife
fromformstory
are
and
birth
storyÕ
individual
oral
orto
the
to
together
would
stories
either
close
themselves
had
or
But
not
understand
tell
patternsÕ
JesusÕ
of
been
poemsdeath.
the
his
individual
heard
aÔoral
ausgenre,
ormajor
tend
tobywhat
traditional
life
closest
could
sagasÕ.16
in
itÕ
There
actually
the
traditional
from
to(birth,
tell
how
oral
Ðtales
and,
kind
influence
create
beepisodes
that
such
ancient
parallels
are
them:
performance
produced
though
of
Nevertheless,
being
styleÕ.18
atradition
is,
all
traditions
childhood,
their
variety
for
literatureÕ
epic
onÐare
Ôby
his
athe
cross-cultural
even,
Ôby
example,
own
part
people
life
as
(e.g.
from
ofinvestiture,
people
composition
combinations.17
tend
the
potential
inbut
ofthe
ways
isgospel
biblical
broad
in
it,
awho
toanever
ÔlifeÕ
who
learned
inoperate,
flashback),
or,
heard
mode
analogies
outline,
which
were
parallels
is.
of
perhaps
had
narrative
isthe
of
death
orLord
linked
inthey
such
Written
written
composition
semi-learned
traditional
gospels
some
the
may
and
more
invokes
tounits
toresurrection).
Ðcannot
sequence
different
help
the
sense
versions
the
which
the
probably,
without
may
liminal
traditional
and
aus
oral
inimplicit
stories
person
number
webethemselves
tofrom
performance,
performers
of
know
joined
tradition
the
bythese
events
birth
who
of
being
but
But
to
interpositi
inÔmythic
stories
have
did not
of
many
of Ômythic
on
only imperfectly
patternsÕ realized
Ð and,even as inhe Matthew
admits, and the Luke.19
so-calledItÔpatternÕ
is much harder is
Cambridge
What
to
JesusÕ
more
Nevertheless,
most
worker
in
different
we
writing
from
gospels
On
meetings:
gather
writings
The
called,
calls
of
gospel
which
mneømoneuein
the
recounting
random
and
talefind
literature
have
asecular
the
gospels
earliest
reader
imitation
two
emperorÕs
actualizing
articulated:
isare
helpful
mythic
Ôthe
literary
focused
them
case
and
written
day
together
apostles.
tradition.
memories
aofbased
parallels
seen,
noticed
in
[euangelia]Õ,
names
he Collections
gospel?
kind
memoirs
teacher.Õ20
Rome
called
has
says,
contexts,
apomneømoneumata,
what
would
heroes
as
the
folklore
witnesses
means
onthe
it
contemporary
of
Justin
birthday,
genre
ofabut
school
gospels
ceased,
between
in
to
prophets
(or
of
one
remains
these
euangelia,
It
an21memory
in
be
folktale
tradition.
[apomneømoneumata]
Sunday,
At
particular
but
the
one
more
anywhere
is
claim
remembers.
memoirs,
apomneømoneuma
epic
the
uses
including
its
Online
parallels
tradition
and
are
To
we
and
mid-second
place,
the
agood
written
but
than
events
true
are
term
heart
find
have
describes
all
for
to
though
patterns
sui
with
the
president
things.21
Ôgood
there
©which
read,
outside
that
be
the
reminiscences,
individual.
Ôthe
that
who
and
the
Cambridge
generis:
comparative
to
living
civic
is
Thus
topublic
the
and
based)
mental
century,
live
gospels
newsÕ.
is
is,
the
major
the
ÔJesusÕ
as
(in
teachings
identified
gospels
oral,
how
nicely
apomneømoneumata
ofroot
verbally
decrees
no
Christian
gospels
voice
memoirs
long
the
narrative
in
on
the
the
these
record
act
speech,
University
deeds
This
As
between
cities
are
reminiscences
apostolic
deeds
material
quotes
as
encapsulates
mneømeø,
singular)
actions
we
apostles,
of
amemory
authorizing
already
texts
of
time
instructs,
revealing.
word
title
ofthe
by
need
oral
that
circles.22
remembering:
his
structures
are
or
the
Propp
the
gospel
permits;
was
codified,
Press,
and
to
tradition.
are
in
it
ÔmemoryÕ:
memory.
act
for
ministryÕ.
not
apostles
are
ismature
testify
fixed
which
look
the
used
was
suggest
words
this
used
or
the
of
aan
like
material
and
They
the
not
But
written
2007
country
ever
memoirs
mentioning
anecdote,
ofstructured
at
forms
are
then
in
duality
But
ithero,
kind
in
exhorts
celebration
simply
the
of
to
or
are
Justin
these
the
aJustin
involves
Invariety
some
called
Christian
the
atext,
very
the
when
deeds
of
which
fact,
gospels.
miracle
name
of
are
verb
rather
narrative
duality
to
himself
anMartyr,
or
the
ofof
stories
ofttold
then,
in
as
Jesus,
Cambridge
22
artistically
unified
Papias,
athe
to
passes
History,
was
And
store
units
tas
because
apomneømoneumata.
themÕ,
Clement
picture:
have
down
between
purposes
another
whether
From
gospels
were
as
particular
apostolic
teaching
with
apomneømoneumata
They
stories
third
Loveday
bridge
the
name
ambiguities
apostolic
not
what
chreias).23
aofthe
to
seen
the
stem
onof
without
written
basis
narrative.
generation,
an
MarkÕs
them
the
word
studentsÕ
had
apomneømoneumata
iii
Mark
anecdotes,
teaching
it
of
earliest
tradition
rhetorical
Collections
the
traditions
as
ÔmemoriesÕ.
from
Alexander
apostle
Alexandria
apostles
his
euangelion.
bishop
was
the
oral
ateaching
assembled
39.2Ð5).
in
used
the
for
generation
gap:
committed
dynamic,
written
turning
arecord
life
ofpreaching
If
PeterÕs
divine
wordsÕ.24
tradition,
deposit
ongoing
already
material
Mark
of
notes
recorded
the
he
himself,
Papias
ofÔneither
his
(or
needs
and
about
aand
Online
Hierapolis
seeks
For
adds
(hypomneøma)
It
oral
into
word-group
gospel
wrote
them
proclamationÕ
text
two-sided
Hence
toembody
stories
hearers
or
their
death
isof
preaching,
of
oral
implies
means
Papias,
seems
All
gospel
writing
a(didaskaliai)
scholarÕs
stages
material
tradition
athe
dying
out
is
into
shaped
only
oral
a©because
few
particular
unified
preserves
ClementÕs
instruction
disciples)
Cambridge
hearer
connected
atraditional
and
of
slightly
in
the
inof
astories
circumstantial
one
interface
teaching
that
collection
well.
out,
authors
therefore,
was
JesusÕ
proper
Rome
of
bythe
questions
and
shaped
gospel
into
stage
commentary.
church
focused
text
nor
the
constant
behind
they
and
PeterÕs
early
Papias
who
language
the
situations.
University
to
formulated
apologetic
up
isanconveyed
words
syntaxis,
writing,
teachings
and
inÐnot
that
removed
with
by
as
Jesus
essentially
Ôjust
begged
written
tradition,
ofeuangelion,
though
eyewitnessÕ.
it
the
on
titles:
second
chance
tradents
preaching;
repetition
himself
apomneømoneumata,
repetition
anecdotes
he
is
and
details
oral
simply
Jesus,
underscores
early
written
atfrom
ashimself
important
Mark
Ôso
Press,
not
actions
for
aabout
(didaskaliai)
record:
In
the
century,
visitors,
one
Peter
performance.
asreal
issoon
(Eusebius,
that
then,
achurch.
other
honing
necessarily
specific
to
oral
good
remove
claim
gospels
and
more
conscious
So
this,
for
Ôgood
2007
belongs
recounted
literary
the
put
already
they
hypomneøma
heand
that
form
composition,
the
they
in
words,
news
asdisplays
the
orthe
collects
Ôthe
The
totakes
via
it
accordance
newsÕ.
his
needs
might
continuity
written
lies
less
Church
Mark,
of
handed
They
were
be
treasuring
about
togospels
is
link
into
that
Peter.
shaped
composition.
unwritten
the
PeterÕs
recording
steps
precisely
structured
(pros
is
used
and
who
with
a ashave
titles at all, so far as we can tell, they are known as the ÔGospel according
Cambridge
What
to
multiple
If
answer
teaching
both MarkÕ,
we aistake
about
toaabout
literary
forms.
Collections
gospel?
or
our
this
theÔJohnÕ,
question:
Jesus.
origin
early
judgement
23 anof
Online
church
It aoddisand
the
gospel
phrase
worth
©aCambridge
tradition
gospels
historical
isnoting
which
the
andseriously,
written
University
seems
that
about
onethisÐtodeposit
their
that
imply
then,
early
Press,
literary
is,of
one
we
testimony
itoral
2007
have
gospel
embodies
form.
another
preaching
taking
reflects
Fora antignos
claim
and
writers
tic
the
scholars
canonical
like
are inclined
Irenaeus,
gospels to with
therebethesuspicious
wasteaching
a clearofofpolemical
the
thehistorical
apostles:
motiveclaim
which
for linking
is apostolic
to why many orig
Butevery
in.
or
writers
consistent
has
Papias
church.
to
would
is
PapiasÕ
not
carry
thehelp
some wepart.27
also
patristic
paint
Even
bearing
weight:
reason
accept
with
mereveals
when
ofIt
so what
to
the
on
ÔI
much
testimony
there
believe
is
the
another
did
connection
transition
weasnot
surprisingly
know
question
were
thethat
also
important
supposeÕ,
fromthis
written
word between
from
reflects
ofother
ofhard
genre.25
oral
agospels,
was
fact
he
living
Mark
ancient
to
says,
not
aidentify
teaching
about
literary
and
just
the
andÔthat
writers;
Peter,
the
oral
abiding
an
toclear
judgement.
gospel
information
antiquarian
written
tradition
the
and
voice.Õ26
quotations
picture
in
this
text
the
Whether
continued
from
quirk
inearly
isThere
these
turn
ofentirely
books
onindividual
and
tradition
much
written
news
its
the
ahas
The
that
gospels
particular
teachers
ÔprovisionalÕ
gospel.
solidity,
distinctive
about
we aslong
text
do written
the
Jesus,
not
Contrary
continue
represents
Robin
while
after
viewpoints
have
language
and,
character
texts
Hood
the
toittolook
to however
aisused
what
particular
film
during
refer
ofwritten
particular
asÐwe
nearly
the
byhas
tomight
amuch
the
individual
performance,
Justin,
Ôthe
down,
aperformance
as
second
it performance
more
expect,
far
gospelÕ
is and
Papias
valued
ephemeral
afield
century:
evangelists.28
without
asin
it (or
and
ofwhich
and
one
is
as Ôthe
Christian
Ôthe
the
quality.
Clement
ancient
troubling
respected,
possible
LordÕ)
underlying
it
gospelÕ,
Itepic
issuggests
preachers
is
instantiation
embodied
asitto
themselves
asthe
astory
retains
living,
if
find
good
Ðeach
that
like
paralle
tooof
unified
to the
ls
in
notes
rhetoric
handbooks
taken
the relative
iswell
by
waystudents
ancient
and
surviving
thefluidity
attested
philosophy.29
gospel
world,
from
fromtradition
in
and
theiraprovisionality
antiquity
the
number
ManyteachersÕ
transfer
operates.
of ofare
theteaching
ofoforal
medical,
based
lectures,
Oral
this
ontraditions,
teaching
rhetorical
notes
and their
form (hypomneømata)
of was
material
writing:
including
and
format
thephilosophical
norm
tothese
betrays
written
medicine,
were
user-books,
Cambridge
24 LovedayCollections
Alexander
Gebrauchsliteratur,
Online © Cambridge
designed not University
as a fossilized
Press, 2007 record of a particu
oral
lar
Ancient
and
aphorisms
word
chreiai,
in
title
define
opposed
chiefly
form
writing
scores
anecdotes
Anecdotes
of
sequence
obvious
aimply,
This
anecdote.
relating
wrote
whose
an
figureheads
modelling
is
life
to
or
anecdotal
life,
trial
which
no
iconography
mental
the
them
aimportant
be
an
single
adaptation
ÔperformanceÕ
or
the
pattern
focus
of
apomneømoneumata,
nothing
lifestyle
structured
enquirer,
starting
and
was
biographical
the
of
as
teaching
action
to
in
his
athematic
and
backbone
frame
to
toof
them.
does
can
solution
Lord
their
network
life-cycle
martyrdom.32
profoundly
ÔBiographyÕ
achreia
length;
Lives
tell
Diogenes
for
and
longer
large
generic
can
teaching
bewith
(so
loyalty,
not
noted
of
But
was
communities
own
or
lifestyle
methods
combined
arather
be
as
ashort,
as
reference
the
of
but
numbers
31
necessarily
philosopherÕs
ato
and
particular
compilations
seen
as
lifestyle
encounters:
the
Ôaword
maxim),
the
with
and
disciple-groups.
patron,
builds
influential
and
the
anecdotes
function).
of
asphilosopherÕs
important
with
The
more
in
existence
than
were
pithy
ancient
Ancient
particularly
Socrates.
Socrates
astory
it
in
ancients
the
were
ofup
fact,
base
or
for
aof
complex
differing
is
an
ÔbiographicalÕ:
orheavily
them
epic
on
clear
tales
teacher.
deed
imply
disciples
to
sufficiently
these
almost
assessing
are
athe
for
belongs
biographical
Philosophers
story
as
Significantly,
that
of
in
ofSignificantly,
ahostile
which
survive
as
cycles,
relating
their
ideological
teacher
full-scale
Socrates
the
constant
and
atales
the
focused
ÔbiographicalÕ
it
clearly
of
As
divine
vigorous
infinite
from
The
philosophical
main
Greco-Roman
tells
adages,
precisely
existence
is
who
the
in
the
words
official.
focused
in
is
generic
birth
to
the
meets
nourished
tothis
putting
carriers
had
master:
calling
acts
glossing
on
the
tradition.
an
significance
in
us.
paradigm
aan
apomneømoneuma
tradition
number
(so
too,
function
gospels,
from
underlying
the
rhetorical
defined
to
these
and
asaround
here.
of
What
story
term
the
abiding
With
world.
memorization
anecdotes
third
them
death
anecdotal
both
so
aand
gnomic,
atradition.30
of
responds
by
and
of
cultural
written
are
anecdotes
the
of
for
The
Diogenes
their
in
these
Socrates,
culminating
Ôfrom
the
the
individualÕ
of
ways,
into
served
updating.
century
is
of
the
But
anecdotes
story,
philosophers
interest
anecdotal
the
these
handbooks
rhetorical
biographical
anecdotal
one-sentence
telling
anot
orhypotext
athat
tradition
teaching)
stories
to
philosophic
there
birth
biography.
many
particular
ongoing
chronological
as
ÔreminiscenceÕ
Laertius,
as
aserve
sayings
JustinÕs
ce,
acting
this
iconic
disciple,
intradition
with
is
to(as
do
and
quotes
tend
handbooks
deathÕ:
who
and
asis
his
parallels
Cambridge
What
tradition,
vignettes
Anecdotal
academies.
transmission
of gospel
is a to
Collections
gospel?
of
tradition
tradition.33
together
Birger
histhe
in
the death.
type
25rabbinic
Gerhardsson
with
also
Online
ofThematerial
therabbinic
played
©pioneered
Apomneømoneumata
schools
Cambridge
ancontained
important
texts
as athe
University
possible
contain
study
inpart
oftheXenophon
ingospels
aof
model
Press,
number
the for
rabbinic
dynamics
and
2007
of
in the
significant
the transmission
Platonic
of
formoral
of contro
andthere
versies
between
each
halakhic
ambivalent)
is
at
no
obvious
Judaism
of
fact.Õ35
gospels.
So
gospels,
gospel
the that,
least
rabbinic
Rabbinic
Jesus,
biographical
Greek
gospels
continuity
other:
tradition,
tradition.
reason
the
debate.
although
the
Rabbinic
is
both
anecdotal
andsages
the
anecdotes
ÔgospelÕ
central
Judaism
as
no
major
the
Jewish
isprime
written
shortage
between
anecdotes
The
and
there
that
existence
tradition
but
Justin,
sages,
tradition,
position
was
rabbinic
of
and
their
locus
about
itÔneither
texts
tradition
isGreek,
Johanan
Torah;
ofcannot
rabbinic
Papias
focused
ample
material
disciples,
healing
of
provides
that
tradition
much
teaching
the
ben
Eliezer
help
to
material
and
Jesus
onfrom
tradition
centre
gospels
provide
oftext:
encounters.
Zakkai
some
us
Clement,
particular
this
opponents,
inthe
also
nor
held
to for
of
important
the
or
is,
identify
generic
for
iscultural
any
contains
never
in
Christianity
putting
Eliezer
asstructured
rabbinic
in
them,
But
other
early
sages.34
weenquirers
itself,
takes
analogues
what
ageneric
have
the
a number
together
ben
Sage
Christianity.
genre
worlds
schools
isawas
this
seen,
task
Like
around
Hyrcanus.
held
and
striking
testimony
parallels
for
ofof
tostep:
the
aofthe
stress
(predominantly)
is
in
encounters
life
the
(rather
person
the
Rabbinic
there
One
The
written
anecdotal
here
evangelists
story
to centre
this
the
isof
they
early
essentially
of
pearls
demonstrated
ÔeditorsÕ
with
literatureÕ.Within
waspre-existent
simply
choose
the
twentieth
onperception
atostring.
or for
similar
conclusively
compilers.
reduce
thethe
century,
unitsgospels
conclusions:
More
that
the
offramework
But
apostolic
though
traditional
recent
the
that
reflect
this
gospel
the
working
narrative
theevangelists
insight
of teaching
this
tradition
folklore
gospels
material,
from
continuity.
does
approaches
tostudies,
different
were
not
iswriting,
arranged
areain
little
much
formThe
to
itself
itpremises,
and
gospel
more
of
form
more
is Ôoral
the
selected
necessarily
not
than
critics
than
criticism
names
too
came
traditional
mere
compilations
difficult
like
ofconflict
to the to
have
look
Cambridge
26
understand
tailored
to
aways
recent
discourse
oral
forms
happens
when
On book
Loveday
offer
the
this
performance
it
for
itGreek
isis
studies
whenwe
with
an
aengenders
Collections
seems
not
maywell
Alexander
aour
parallel
exclusive
book?
side,
skill
the
gospels
suggest
move
totohave
same
begenre
are
there
andhow
book
from
Online
orasartistry
thing
that
been
fardefinitive
oral
is
four
the
for
from
the
overstated,
by
an
©the
asearly
tradition
Cambridge
individual
no
emerging
giving
polarity
predictable.36
for
means
gospels
rendition
church
ananconsensus
individual
it
inevitable,
toUniversity
between
performances
oral
is
sawGreek
remains
written
ofSo
them.
performance;
the
oral
our
that
audience
true
text?
biography.
Press,
and
tradition;
Nevertheless,
and
final
ofthat
theWhat
the
literate
2007
best
but
and,
question
the
gospel,
is
In not
and
place
though
move
aliterary
hiswriting
modes
gospel
claiming
inis:
influential
each
from
to
many
of
what
Greek
focused
(just
subject
features
as
anecdotes
shaped
the
great
rather
1992aheroÕs
study
whole,
bios
as
collection
like
than
oninabout
of What
or
athe
life
ithigh
the
chronological
ÔlifeÕ
life
isAre
gospels)
acomparison.
canonical
from
ofparticular
proportion
not the
story
anecdotes
isattypically
birth Gospels?,
the
all
of(or
gospels,
lines,
Reading
aabout
subject
of
obvious
individual
famous
commissioning)
verbs.
and
aRichard
with
monograph
the
ofindividual
that
there
Nevertheless,
theflowing,
Greek
ayou
philosophers
Burridge
if
iswill
biography
you
of death.
biographical
to
littlesimilar
from
put
end
points
connected
there
together
up
is
attempt
birth
is with
Diogenes
arranged
length
also
out
are
tradition
toto
something
narrative
that
athe
death,
some
toon
collection
provide
LaertiusÕ
grammatical
the
puzzling
thematic
where
gospels,
tracing
narrativ
of
ecoherence.37
the
are
paparazzi
in
mostthe
good
hostile,
Greek
biographical
news
ofbiographies
And
polemical
the
aspectwhattradition
ancientthat
isbear
orworld.
most
islittle
simply
essential
obviously
means
And
sensationalist:
resemblance
thetoencyclopaedic
that missing
comparison
the gospels.
toinbiographers
cultic
this
ispattern
Many
built
tradition
or kerygmatic
Greek
are
into
embedded
the
is genre;
biographies
the narrative
Within
s.
the
martyrdom
together
Nevertheless,
Arnaldo
around
relationship
martyr,
roletheMomigliano
andofstories,
to Greek
turn
Jesus
produce
the
between
thesaint
ofphilosophical
isthe
appearance
and
calls
athe
Socrates,
coherent
became
fictitious
eras:
a Ônew
living
ofbiography
ÔThe
central
tradition,
subject
thewriters
atmosphereÕ
and letters;
gospels
the
subjects
ofdead.
ofof
the
innumerable
but
Socrates.
coincides
in
biographies
figure
The
ofno-one
biographical
biography,
wisewho
anecdotes,
ever
with
man,
best
created
put
what
writing
the
in parallels
this
addition
adialogues,
meaningful
material
to
affectionate
Cambridge
What
the
be seen
king,
is in
a the
Collections
gospel?
second-century
portraits
writer,
27 andOnline
of well-loved
the©philosopher.Õ38
texts Cambridge
like individuals
TacitusÕ
University
Signs
Agricola
basedPress,
of thepersonal
or
on LucianÕs
2007moodrecollection,
new Demonax,
can
in
from
story
ApolloniusÕ
Life
alternative
was
more
Sophistic
claims
the
real
as
following
well
athe
written
third
first-century
of
elaborate
possibility
pagan
ofto
story
asJesus,
Apollonius
arival
circles
be
century,
memory.39
broadly
disciple
genre
in
ofthan
based,
the
Apollonius
and
that
tofor
Philostratus
Syria
falls
third
when
narrative
is
may
the
The
Damis.
the
allegedly
gospels,
be
Philostratus
gospels.42
shift
whose
into
century
gospels.40
story
ofA more
no outline,
Tyana,
anumber
from
life
moved
special
of
based
ce
andthan
Apollonius
Motifs
biography
story
bya Philostratus;
of
But
bears
in.
is and
Pythagorean
on
scholars
genre,
an
writing,
the
DamisÕ
shows
the
found
designed
the
elaborate
existing
torhetorical
contemporary
isÔaretalogyÕ,
remarkable
reminiscences,
in
hagiography
have
we
being
wonder-worker
the
tofiction;41
have
itbiography
suggested
foster
consciously
gospels
istoimprint
parallels
reminiscences
much
which
reckon
isimitation
onand,
can
epitomized
that
of
longer
provides
of
which
Apollonius
with
marketed
be toparalleled
the
by and
itofan
the
but
story
study
concludes
accounts
Does
side?
withthe greater
the
isprecise
of
Rabbinic
hard
biographic
of
search
that
aorsingle
toliterature,
Ôthe
lesser
literary
for
match
writing
aGospels
lifeÕ.44
genre
degrees
in form
the
asfor
inwe
areadopted
Greek
ofthe
the
almost
have
precision
classical
biographical
gospels
byunique
seen,MarkÕs
inliterature
fare
offers
aspagan
performance
tradition.
multiple,
any ample
Greek
better
ofparallels
literature,43
the
contemporary
of the
Indeed,
on imperial
Jesus
Jewish
toa the
recent
period
anecdo
Jesus
tal
literature
ample
The
cycles
encompass
Bible
of
is
the
intertextuality
classical
Ôa
to
Hebrew
character
Ôreligious
tradition,
precedent
is
these
purposeful
the
inbuilt
which
his
biblical
stops
Bible
tales
Greek
entire
ofaround
intensityÕ
for
individual
with
but
short
itself
religious,
Jewish
are
historiography.45
tradition,
biographical
nosubordinated
life,
the
biographical
offolk
connected
is
biblical
fully
of
much
tales
from
ethical,
traditions
the
surely,
fledged
more
birth
narrative
of
gospel
rabbinic
themes
Ôstory
to
the
deeply
Much
and
tonarratives
the
that
biography
heroÕs
for
deathÕ.46
national
of
ofwe
cyclesÕ
overall
biography.
elsewhere
prone
generations
covenant,
the
should
prowess
narrative
asand
to
like
narrative
workÕ
Moreover,
akingdom,
in
Ôbio-structuringÕ
look
But
literary
those
Ôare
their
Jewish
which
to ifcome.47
for
ofstyle
sorich
rabbinic
of
inwas
the
literature.
arranged
prophecy
genre,
Samson
theHebrew
and
to
origins
ideological
ItHebrew
determine
goals
there
than
or
toof
andElijah,
is
onlyallegorical
Cambridge
28
promise
move
coherent
modes
Nevertheless,
chosen
are
Jewish
number
Abraham
in
related
order
is
the
embodied
Loveday
Jewish
the
worth
soul,
from
one
oflimited
asbyto
writer
ofÐof
and
narrative
athe
in
Collections
all
disjointed
the
(specifically,
considering.
single
and
Alexander
each
coherent
OnHebrew
torah.49
hisfeatures
we
gospel-writers;
whose
they
Joseph
sense
rather
character
works
still
treatises
isnarrative.
are
Bible.
allegorical
anecdotes
that
PhiloÕs
Online
most
(and
than
that
hard
need
The
described
Jewish-Greek)
they
in
easily
first
devoted
the
historical:
actually
toLife
©and
theCambridge
parallel
and
explain
lost
collect
The
expositions
isof
Bible
asexplained
here
sayings
to
treatment
inMoses,
On
living
bears
individual
two
writing
Philo,
Isaac
together
and
the
inUniversity
the
Greek
to
precise
contemporary
arrange
patriarchs
prototypes
with
of
on
and
ofconnected,
the
title
ofthe
thebiography.48
reference
Bible
Onthe
first-century
narrative
Bible
them
other
Press,
Jacob)
separate
characters,
bios:
Second
represent
ofcharacters.
developments
in
theologically
in
the
hand
cf.
2007
to
are
chronological
Greek
structure
Temple
incidents
ethical
The
the
(the
Moses
ÔbiographicalÕ
Alexandrian
however,
the evangelistsÕ
narrative
contain
PhiloÕs
period
history
1.1;
principles
2.292),
aOnof
birth
account
thematically
one
to
narrative
hasbeof
a addressed
much
and
PhiloÕs
theprovided
ending
more
bulk
under
most
obviously
to
with
of the
aoutsiders.
the
accessible
point
his
headings
biblical
biographical
death,
of cultural
Itworks,
ofsuggests
andking,
Moses compressing
and
character,
narrative
contact
lawgiver
thethe
at one
between
Ðinto
very
beginning
and
that
though
aGreek
high
least
has
single
still
priest.
the
with
that
andbest
connected
arranged
MosesÕ
biographical
Jew,
This
claim
a flexible
is
difficulty
The
tradition.
biographical
death,
which
to
martyr.51
written
and
paradigms
torture
tyranny.50
God
readily
second
it highlight
Ðand
is
inand
and Many
this
oftodeath
development
there
the
comprehensible
tradition,
therefore
Jewish
reflect
But
ofmartyrdom
period
are
Jewish
the
of martyrdom,
athat
the
the
key
ofisSocrates
number
allocate
tradition
Antiochus
aged
ideology
in
as
motifs
framework
provides
the
ofthe
Eleazar
significant
area
was
texts
proper
areand
had
Epiphanes
Maccabean
the
that
the
already
offrom
and
cultural
its
closure
setting
martyrology.
model
could
the
own
the
narrative
present
in
martyrs.
mother
for
prototypes
be aphilosophic
values
first
to
the
for moulded
second
one
life
in
and
Inofof
century
space
The the
the
her
athe
for
lived
stories
without
century
particular
to
book
Greek
seven
the
and
resistance
the
most
inofof
martyrÕs
earlier
obedience
death
bce,
sons
Daniel,
enduring
theethical
for
of the
Cambridge
What
refusing
in
(second
(first
biographical
are
interest
about
as
may
associated
from
problem
adds
Jewish
for
Temple
the
So
answer
agospels
are
told
Prophets,
prophets
have
cultural
istheir
multiplicity
afull
another
orof
glance
literature,
Judaism.
we
inabeen
century
tothe
nothing
inCollections
gospel?
second
biography)
left
with
the
eat
the
lives.52
as
can
(one
died
strand
interchange
almost
some
at
end
gospel
good
with
bce)
manner
the
becentury
of
these
29paralleled
of
and
iskind
and
forbidden
the
tombs
to
news
ThomasÕs
literary
to
the
certainly
These
are
probably,
Online
the
genre
ofof
brief
the
acts
the
martyrsÕ
ce).
odd
subordinated
between
the
miracles
of
brief
pilgrim
variety
sophisticated
by
as
©in
features
the
biographical
answer,
foods
forms,
Martyrology
subjectsÕ
Cambridge
dating
athemselves.
Yesprevious
and
saints.
forceful
Jewish
contemporary
associated
guidebook
of
and
pressed
from
schematic
that
ofNo.
from
to
biographical
death
andUniversity
the
details
Whatever
philosophical
is
lives).
notices
reminder
the
pre-70
Nevertheless,
Many
onrecounting
Hellenistic
not
Maccabean
plain
with
gospels
texts,
them
life
ofofthat
But
Palestine,
we
concise
their
forms
of
the
Press,
by
narrative
itself
stories
the
call
especially
the
are
the
martyrs
they
motifs
encomium
manner
the
literature
graves.
their
in
so-called
them,
many
unique?
2007
tyrant
necessarily
information
(nothing
cult
cannot
first-century
combine
ofpossibilities
that
isin
in
existence
itlegends
2The
of
The
are
that
which
Maccabees
is
ÔsolveÕ
in
appear
the
4Lives
Lives
intensive
so
told
Maccabees
clear
Second
wegrand
anecdotal
ofthe
in
of
tradition
strongly
framework
intertextuality)
why
the
material
fruitful
rabbinic
the
biblical
psychological
which
reminiscent
works
takes
(connectives,
analogies.
academies
framework,
acted
isowecertainly
when ascharacterization
it
of
much
and
But
a more
is
the
narrative
andprime
inshows
what
written
Greek
not
the
tomay
carrier
unique:
Greek
bios
structure,
the
nodown,
besign
Bible.
unique
but
of
ofafolklore
philosophical
the
of
school
form
whose
use
This
being
iswhose
gospels
the
narrative
oftraditions
studies
could
influenced
direct
particular
schools.
external
is explain,
wholly
suggest
mode
speech,
both
byshape
The
form
and
within
incidentally,
the
ainway
number
theological
this
is
philosophic
the
ethos tradition
al
gospels
employed
bay.53 show
by Greek
no awareness
which
historians
so dominated
of and
the biographers
normal
Greekdistancing
biography;
to keepmechanisms
and
thewhysupernatural
theroutinelyat
8. Vladimir
Cambridge
30
If
wrong
been
away)
(or
Unfortunately
and
transformation,
That
same
is
we
shaped
the
that
forms
within
1.
Notes
prayer.
Koester,
SCM
discovered
especially
2.
3.
Biography
4.
have
character
5.
6.
19Ð29;
7.
The
2001),
Loveday
this
no
probably
For
Richard
The
Mk
Cf.
whoever
that
question.
Christ
Press,
Cambridge
dominated
may
could
tradition
no
kind
the
evidence
and
16.1Ð8;
athe
Irenaeus,
obvious
also
21.1Ð23.
Stephen
170Ð83.
seems
human
suggests
be
full
Ancient
Collections
gospels,
out
(SNTSMS
(Satan)
Alexander
of
be
Jesus
whom
community,
1990),
at
¤1.5.
A.
wasCompanion
one
have
Acts
Propp,
inconclusive,
question.
(or
The
said
again
discussion
Nag
Burridge,
observers
Matt
byLuke
elsewhere
its
exceptions
C.the
andwere
reason
they
the
tradition
Christian
Against
1.22;
the
perhaps
that
gospels
ch.
Hammadi
70;
rather
Barton,
asinto
of
characteristic
28.1Ð10,
Theory
first
earliest
believed
alone
Online
search
if
other
in
1.
Cambridge:
itto
why
10.37;
Gospel
themselves
What
but
weand
for
the
its
of
Koester
Heresies
than
toJesus
fortunately),
may
came
do
are
ÔMany
it16Ð20;
as
Gospels:
has
itare
were
texts
the
are
©History
for
write
euangelion
ongoing
iconography,
not
beJesus
is
preachers
good
to
the
an
13.24.
Cambridge
may
criticism
into
term
still
Gospels,
atemptation
hoping
time
so
be
points
claim
the
Cambridge
internal
(Cambridge:
and
shape,
3.11.8.
beTheir
pre-existent
the
active
news,
Lkbeing
hard
alive.
tradition
ÔgospelÕ
Gospels?
ascend
because
to
genres
structured
24.1Ð11,
of
gospel
the
noFolklore
as
to
out
University
for
change
to
focused
which
One
atUniversity
agents
its
History
psychological
find
asuch
thank.
They
title
pin
that
to
amost
of
generic
stories
Jesus?Õ,
Cambridge
weheaven:
down)
liturgy
Ain
time
persists
of
13Ð35,
genre
them
the
were
Comparison
have
in
on
second-century
the
ÔgospelÕ
as
ofathe
They
life-giving
and
(Manchester:
Press,
mould
poured
way
of
that
period.
the
down
title:
responsible
so-called
ofbeen
to
has
and
Development
Press,
dialogue
36Ð49;
in
profound
were
Lk
University
weMarkus
encounter
through
Matt
process.
past
explain
transformation.54
into
Ðbeen
its
for
24.50Ð3;
2007
asking
his
configure
with
though
Certainly
and
the
41992).
Jn
century
stories
daily
themselves:
which
Jesus
discovered:
ÔGnostic
and
with
Manchester
cultural
for
ones
written
texts,
Graeco-Roman
20.1Ð10,
Bockmuehl,
(or
for
the
with
(London:
Press,
the
Lk
Acts
that
life
anexplain
Mark
story.
who
giving
has
there
carried
4,
see
external
GospelsÕ
1.1Ð11.
ofUniver
which
11Ð18,
see
Helmut
ed.,
Press,
sity
9. Mark1984),
Allan Powell,
21. What is Narrative Criticism? (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990)
10. Propp, Folklore, 22.
,71.
33.the
What
11.
12.
13.
donors,
14.
ed.,
Antonio:
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
not
24.
25.
of
Rethinking
26.
27.
Mohr
28.
29.
Cambridge
30.
The
Robbins,
31.
32.
and
Ancient
Ibid.
Albert
Ibid.,
Justin,
On
Ôwhat
See
Eusebius,
Cf.
Koester,
Texts
Progymnasmata
Hock
Loveday
Andrew
Birger
isGospelsÕ,
The
Siebeck,
the
aand
ProppÕs
the
further
Samuel
Literary
Relationships
Trinity
Ancient
Collections
gospel?
he
University
in
Lord,
38.
39Ð40.
41Ð44.
80.
44Ð58.
45.
history
the
D.
Gerhardsson,
heroÕs
First
Alexander,
[Mark]
Ancient
Ronald
OÕNeil,
History,
Church
2000),
Clarke,
Gospel
Byrskog,
ÔdonorsÕ:
Loveday
ÔThe
University
in
Quotes
Setting
31of
Apology
(Atlanta:
opponents,
rememberedÕ
Richard
Hock
History,
and
Christian
Press,
Chreia,
Online
Gospels
the
Audiences
eds.,
Among
iii
The
ÔActs
Alexander,
Story
and
Memory
the
and
(Eerdmans:
Folklore,
67;
term,
39.15.
Preface
Press,
J.
1993).
Scholars
Anecdotes
The
©as
the
literature
Edward
82Ð3;
and
and
cf.
ii
iii
Cambridge
Bauckham,
Gospels,
and
cf.
but
(Grand
Book
Oral
Gospels:
15.1Ð2;
History
Ancient
persons
65Ð6;
PapiasÕ
39.4.
1978),
ÔAncient
to
109Ð10.
Manuscript:
24:
Koester,
Ôwhat
OÕNeil,
Grand
Press,
of
Traditional
LukeÕs
(Sonoma:
Rapids:
ÔBesides
Dialogue
there
¤1.4;
Acts
University
cf.
Ðed.,
Intellectual
whom
An
33Ð91.
hosa
he
Rapids,
History
Book-Production
The
1986);
Interdisciplinary
Ancient
[Peter]
iv
Gospel
in
The
cited.
ch.
heits
emneømoneusen
Eerdmans,
Polebridge,
Oral
14.5Ð7.
Chreia
the
105,
saves
LiteratureÕ,
Gospels
5.
1993),
asTradition
examples
Press,
(SNTSMS
First
protagonist
Christian
recountedÕ.
106.
Story
BiographyÕ,
inor31Ð63.
1997),
for
Ancient
Century
2007
rescues.Õ
1989).
and
(WUNT
78;
inshould
All
and
inWilliam
Dialogue
Gospels,
Vernon
the
71Ð111.
Cambridge:
there
Christians:
123;
Rhetoric,
in
Setting,
Written
beBruceW.Winter
Circulation
K.T¬ubingen:
are
translated
(San
ch.1.
O.Walker,
Transm
helpers,
i:
i:
in Rabbinic
ission
1998).
University
34.
the
Conferences
35.
36. P. S.
EvidenceÕ,
Ibid.,
Werner
SeeAlexander,
also
Press,
41.
H.Kelber,
Judaism
of innowChristopher
1982 2001).
Martin
and
ÔRabbinic
The Early
1983
Oral
Jaffee,
(JSNTS
Christianity
M.
and
Biography
Tuckett,
the
Torah
7;Written
Sheffield:
ined.,
and(repr.
the
the
Gospel
Synoptic
Mouth
Biography
Grand
JSOT (Philadelphia:
(New
Press,
Rapids:
Studies:
York:
of Jesus:
1984),
Eerdmans,
Oxford
The Fortress,
A Survey 19
Ampleforth
19Ð50. of
arguesincompatible
83)
Recent
Ônot
History, forGenre,
folklore
a radical
studies
Meaning
butdisjunction
reciprocal
are more paradigmsÕ:
(Bloomington:
between
inclined
Indiana
oral
to cf.
approach
andEli
University
literate
Yassif,
literacy
Press,
modes
Theand
1999),
oforality
Hebrew
discourse.
ixÐxi.
Folktale:
as
37.Loveday
Cambridge
32 PlutarchCollections
Alexander
provides better
Online parallels
© CambridgetoUniversity
the narrative Press,
coherence
2007 of the gospels
; but
he
the
prefers
of shares
the
mostteachings
atelling
DiogenesÕ
purely revelation
thematic
of conviction
the Stoic
arrangement,
ofphilosopher
thatsubjectÕs
the theand isolated
Epictetus
Arrian
ethossaying
presents
orsimply
moral
or in
anecdote
his
character.
the
recollections
form
provides
Suetonius
of ÔDiscour
withTacitus,
sesÕ
38.
Harvard
39.
general,
Arnaldo
no University
narrative
cf.Momigliano,
Agricola
M. J.atEdwards
Press,
all.
¤46;
The1993),
Lucian,
and
Development
Simon
104.
Demonax
Swain,
of ¤2.
Greek
eds.,
OnBiography
the new biographical
Portraits: (Cambridge,
BiographicalMA:Repres
mood in
in the
entation
Clarendon
40.
the
41. E.g.L.
Gospels
E. Greek
Morton
Press,
Bowie,
and
andJesus,Õ
Smith,
Latin ÔProlegomena
1997).
ÔApollonius
Literature
JBL, of
90 Tyana:
(1971),
oftotheTradition
a174Ð99.
Roman Empire
Discussion andofRealityÕ,
(Oxford:
Aretalogies,
ANRW,Divine
ii.16.2Men,(1978),
42.
43.
Motifs?Õ,
44.
45.
connections
individuals
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
1652Ð99.
F. R.
Yassif,
Ibid.,
Edwards
Philo,
See
Tessa
D. G.further,
Downing,
in
Rajak,
A.
37.
Onwith
to
Hebrew
and
Tuckett,
Hare,
Abraham,
anSwain,
Jewish
Loveday
ÔDying
extent
ÔContemporary
Folktale,
ÔTheSynoptic
Portraits,
¤4Ð5.
historiography,
for
Lives
thatthe
Alexander,
31.
isStudies,
of LawÕ,
Analogies
alien
the
28ÔAncient
33.
27:
27Ð8.
n.in
ProphetsÕ,
ÔThe
towhich
74.
51Ð65.
Edwards
Greek
toIntellectual
Gospels
thein
is historical
centred
and
Gospels
obviously
J. Swain,
H. Charlesworth,
around
and
BiographyÕ.
writing.Õ
Portraits,
have
Acts:
prominent
close
Genres
39Ð67.
ed.,
cultural
orThe Old
Pseudepigrapha
Testament
Schwemer,
i,
53.
54.
99. iiIt
Loveday
(T¬ubingen:
is always
Studien
Alexander,
(New
worth
zuYork:
Mohr
denconsidering
Siebeck,
ÔFact,
fr¬uhj¬udischen
Doubleday,
Fiction,
1995).
the1985),
andProphetenlegenden
possibility
the
ii,Genre
385Ð99;
that
of the
AnnaVitae
ActsÕ,
generic
Maria
NTS,
Prophetarum,
44 (1998),ma380Ð
influence
ywork in the opposite direction: cf. G.W. Bowersock, Fiction as History (Berkeley
:University of California Press, 1994), 143. Apollonius of Tyana is a clear case
Further
point.
in
Alexander,
EvidenceÕ,
of
Bauckham,
1982 andreading
Richard,
P.1983
in S.,(Sheffield:
C. M.ÔRabbinic
ed.,
Tuckett,
The Gospels
Biography
ed., Press,
JSOT Synoptic
forandAll
1984),
the
Studies:
Christians:
Biography
19Ð50The Rethinking
of Jesus: Athe
Ampleforth Conferences
Survey
Gospel
of Authe
(Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1996)
diences
Burridge,
What
Bockmuehl,
Cambridge
is a Richard
Collections
gospel?
University
Markus,A.,
33andPress,
Online
What
Hagner,
are
2005)
© the
Cambridge
Donald
Gospels?
A.,University
eds.,
A Comparison
The Written
Press,with
2007
Gospel
Graeco-Roman
(Cambridge:
Biogr
(Cambridge:
aphy
Byrskog, Samuel,
Cambridge
StoryUniversity
as HistoryPress,
Ð History
1992).
as Story (T¬ubingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000)
Jaffee, Martin S., Torah in the Mouth: Writing and Oral Tradition in Palestinian
Kelber,
Judaism,Werner
200 bceÐ400
H., TheceOral
(Newand
York:
theOxford
WrittenUniversity
Gospel (Philadelphia:
Press, 2001) Fortress, 1983
)Koester, Susan,
(Philadelphia:
Niditch, Helmut,Trinity
ed.,
Ancient
Text
Press
Christian
andInternational,
Tradition:
Gospels:
The1990)
Their
HebrewHistory
Bible and Folklore
Development
(Atlanta:
Stanton,
Yassif,
2004)
University
ScholarsEli,
Press,
Graham
Press,
TheN.,
1990)
Hebrew
1999)
JesusFolktale:
and Gospel
History,
(Cambridge:
Genre,Cambridge
Meaning (Bloomington:
University Press,
Indiana