GN
Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2020
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
% Inuit
Inuit Non‐Inuit Employees % Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit in Staff Non‐Inuit in Staff Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation Housing Allocation Housing Staff Housing Ratio
a b (b/a) c (c/a) d e (e/d) f (f/d) (e/b) (f/c)
Executive 29 13 45% 16 55% 18 1 6% 12 67% 8% 75%
Senior Management 138 28 20% 110 80% 72 11 15% 61 85% 39% 55%
Middle Management 372 103 28% 269 72% 221 38 17% 183 83% 37% 68%
Professional 1,423 405 28% 1,018 72% 863 135 16% 728 84% 33% 72%
Paraprofessional 726 450 62% 276 38% 253 113 45% 140 55% 25% 51%
Administrative Support 982 835 85% 147 15% 187 137 73% 50 27% 16% 34%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 46 2 4% 44 96% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 2 ‐ 0% 2 100% 0% 0%
3,670 1,834 50% 1835.8 50% 1,662 437 26% 1,220 73% 24% 66%
GN Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2019
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
Inuit Non‐Inuit Inuit Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Allocation Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation % Allocation % Staff Housing Ratio
Executive 30 11 37% 19 63% 17 4 24% 13 76% 36% 68%
Senior Management 130 24 18% 106 82% 60 10 17% 50 83% 42% 47%
Middle Management 368 105 29% 263 71% 199 39 20% 159 80% 37% 60%
Professional 1,393 393 28% 1,001 72% 832 138 17% 689 83% 35% 69%
Paraprofessional 686 429 62% 258 38% 225 94 42% 119 53% 22% 46%
Administrative Support 962 826 86% 137 14% 192 137 71% 49 26% 17% 36%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 61 4 7% 57 93% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
3,569 1,787 50% 1782.55 50% 1,586 426 27% 1,136 72% 24% 64%
Notes:
Overall the Government of Nunavut provides staff housing for 1,620 employees, 446 Inuit employees (28%) and 1,193 non‐Inuit employees (74%)
1,151 (71%) of staff housing units are allocated to the employees in the professional, middle management, senior management and executive, meaning that a majority of the staff housing subsidy is going to
employees in the higher income categories.
Inuit employees in staff housing have the highest concentration in the administrative support, paraprofessional and professional employment categories, representing 385 of the 446 (86%). However when
comparing the ratio of employees in any given employment category Inuit will have significantly lower ratio of staff housing than their counterparts in he same employment category.
For example in the professional employment category
Inuit hold a total of 405 professional positions within the government of Nunavut, while only 135 (33%) of these Inuit employees are in staff housing.
Non‐Inuit hold a total of 1,018 professional positions within the government of Nunavut, while 728 (72%) of these non‐Inuit employees are in staff housing.
For example in the Middle Management employment category
Inuit hold a total of 103 middle management positions within the government of Nunavut, while only 38 (17%) of these Inuit employees are in staff housing.
Non‐Inuit hold a total of 269 middle management positions within the government of Nunavut, while 183 (68%) of these non‐Inuit employees are in staff housing.
1
Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2020
By Employment Category
71% in % of Filled
higher level Total Filled Positions in
GN Inuit Non‐Inuit Total positions March 31, 2019 Staff Housing
Executive 1.0 12.0 13.0 1% 27.0 48%
Senior Management 11.0 61.0 72.0 4% 129.0 56%
Middle Management 38.0 183.0 221.0 13% 349.0 63%
Professional 135.0 728.0 863.0 52% 1,339.0 64%
Paraprofessional 113.0 140.0 253.0 15% 689.5 37%
Administrative Support 137.0 50.0 187.0 11% 960.4 19%
Casual Healthcare 2.0 44.0 46.0 3% ‐ 0%
437.0 1,218.0 1,655.0 3,493.9 47%
% in Staff Housing 26.4% 73.6% 47.4%
OLA Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2020
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
% Inuit
Inuit Non‐Inuit Employees % Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit in Staff Non‐Inuit in Staff Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation Housing Allocation Housing Staff Housing Ratio
a b (b/a) c (c/a) d e (e/d) f (f/d) (e/b) (f/c)
Executive 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% 5 ‐ 0% 0 0% 0% 0%
Senior Management 4 ‐ 0% 4 100% ‐ ‐ 0% 0 0% 0% 0%
Middle Management 5 2 40% 3 60% ‐ ‐ 0% 0 0% 0% 0%
Professional 12 7 58% 5 42% 2 1 50% 1 50% 14% 20%
Paraprofessional 8 5 63% 3 38% 3 2 67% 1 33% 40% 33%
Administrative Support 4 4 100% ‐ 0% 1 1 100% 0 0% 25% 0%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 1 ‐ 0% 1 0% 0% 0%
34 18 53% 16 47% 355 65 18% 290 82% 361% 1813%
Department of Health Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2019
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
Inuit Non‐Inuit Inuit Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Allocation Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation % Allocation % Staff Housing Ratio
Executive 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Senior Management 4 ‐ 0% 4 100% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Middle Management 5 2 40% 3 60% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Professional 14 8 57% 6 43% 2 1 50% 1 50% 13% 17%
Paraprofessional 7 4 57% 3 43% 3 2 67% 1 33% 50% 33%
Administrative Support 5 4 80% 1 20% 1 1 100% ‐ 0% 25% 0%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0% 0%
36 18 50% 18 50% 6 4 67% 2 33% 22% 11%
Department of EIA Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2020
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
% Inuit
Inuit Non‐Inuit Employees % Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit in Staff Non‐Inuit in Staff Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation Housing Allocation Housing Staff Housing Ratio
a b (b/a) c (c/a) d e (e/d) f (f/d) (e/b) (f/c)
Executive 3 2 67% 1 33% 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% 0% 100%
Senior Management 7 4 57% 3 43% 3 1 33% 2 67% 25% 67%
Middle Management 6 5 83% 1 17% 2 2 100% 0 0% 40% 0%
Professional 12 6 50% 6 50% 2 ‐ 0% 2 100% 0% 33%
Paraprofessional 4 4 100% ‐ 0% 1 1 100% 0 0% 25% 0%
Administrative Support 28 27 96% 1 4% 6 5 83% 1 17% 19% 100%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
60 48 80% 12 20% 15 9 60% 6 40% 19% 50%
Department of EIA Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2019
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
Inuit Non‐Inuit Inuit Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Allocation Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation % Allocation % Staff Housing Ratio
Executive 2 2 100% ‐ 0% 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% 0% #DIV/0!
Senior Management 8 5 63% 3 38% 4 2 50% 2 50% 40% 67%
Middle Management 7 4 57% 3 43% 3 2 67% 1 33% 50% 33%
Professional 20 10 50% 10 50% 9 5 56% 4 44% 50% 40%
Paraprofessional 5 4 80% 1 20% 1 1 100% ‐ 0% 25% 0%
Administrative Support 33 32 97% 1 3% 8 7 88% 1 13% 22% 100%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
75 57 76% 18 24% 26 17 65% 9 35% 30% 50%
Department of FIN Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2020
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
% Inuit
Inuit Non‐Inuit Employees % Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit in Staff Non‐Inuit in Staff Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation Housing Allocation Housing Staff Housing Ratio
a b (b/a) c (c/a) d e (e/d) f (f/d) (e/b) (f/c)
Executive 3 ‐ 0% 3 100% 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% 0% 33%
Senior Management 10 1 10% 9 90% 2 ‐ 0% 2 100% 0% 22%
Middle Management 22 4 18% 18 82% 8 2 25% 6 75% 50% 33%
Professional 32 5 16% 27 84% 12 2 17% 10 83% 40% 37%
Paraprofessional 64 30 47% 34 53% 15 7 47% 8 53% 23% 0%
Administrative Support 25 23 92% 2 8% 4 4 100% 0 0% 17% 0%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
156 63 40% 93 60% 42 15 36% 27 64% 24% 29%
Department of FIN Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2019
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
Inuit Non‐Inuit Inuit Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Allocation Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation % Allocation % Staff Housing Ratio
Executive 4 ‐ 0% 4 100% 1 1 100% 0% #DIV/0! 0%
Senior Management 13 1 8% 12 92% 4 4 100% 0% 400% 0%
Middle Management 29 8 28% 21 72% 7 6 86% 0% 75% 0%
Professional 57 13 23% 44 77% 25 20 80% 0% 154% 0%
Paraprofessional 76 43 57% 33 43% 18 6 33% 0% 14% 0%
Administrative Support 26 26 100% ‐ 0% 6 ‐ 0% 0% 0% #DIV/0!
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% 0% 0% 0%
205 91 44% 114 56% 61 37 61% ‐ 0% 41% 0%
Department of HR Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2020
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
% Inuit
Inuit Non‐Inuit Employees % Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit in Staff Non‐Inuit in Staff Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation Housing Allocation Housing Staff Housing Ratio
a b (b/a) c (c/a) d e (e/d) f (f/d) (e/b) (f/c)
Executive 2 1 50% 1 50% ‐ ‐ 0% 0 0% 0% 0%
Senior Management 6 3 50% 3 50% 3 2 67% 1 33% 67% 33%
Middle Management 10 4 40% 6 60% 6 6 100% 0 0% 150% 0%
Professional 30 11 37% 19 63% 14 6 43% 8 57% 55% 42%
Paraprofessional 16 14 88% 2 13% 6 5 83% 1 17% 36% 0%
Administrative Support 9 9 100% ‐ 0% 2 2 100% 0 0% 22% #DIV/0!
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
73 42 58% 31 42% 31 21 68% 10 32% 50% 32%
Department of HR Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2019
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
Inuit Non‐Inuit Inuit Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Allocation Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation % Allocation % Staff Housing Ratio
Executive ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% #DIV/0!
Senior Management ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% #DIV/0!
Middle Management ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% #DIV/0!
Professional ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% #DIV/0!
Paraprofessional ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% #DIV/0!
Administrative Support ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% #DIV/0!
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
‐ ‐ 0% 0 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% #DIV/0!
Department of JUS Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2020
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
% Inuit
Inuit Non‐Inuit Employees % Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit in Staff Non‐Inuit in Staff Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation Housing Allocation Housing Staff Housing Ratio
a b (b/a) c (c/a) d e (e/d) f (f/d) (e/b) (f/c)
Executive 1 1 100% ‐ 0% 2 ‐ 0% 2 100% 0% #DIV/0!
Senior Management 7 ‐ 0% 7 100% 6 ‐ 0% 6 100% 0% 86%
Middle Management 22 7 32% 15 68% 15 4 27% 11 73% 57% 73%
Professional 47 11 23% 36 77% 26 5 19% 21 81% 45% 58%
Paraprofessional 44 20 45% 24 55% 30 13 43% 17 57% 65% 0%
Administrative Support 164 85 52% 79 48% 68 33 49% 35 51% 39% 44%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% 0% 0%
285 124 44% 161 56% 148 55 37% 93 63% 44% 58%
Department of JUS Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2019
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
Inuit Non‐Inuit Inuit Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Allocation Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation % Allocation % Staff Housing Ratio
Executive 2 1 50% 1 50% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Senior Management 7 1 14% 6 86% 4 ‐ 0% 4 100% 0% 67%
Middle Management 22 7 32% 15 68% 10 3 30% 7 70% 43% 47%
Professional 46 11 24% 35 76% 32 7 22% 25 78% 64% 71%
Paraprofessional 40 21 53% 19 48% 20 9 45% 11 55% 43% 58%
Administrative Support 153 85 56% 68 44% 69 36 52% 33 48% 42% 49%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
270 126 47% 144 53% 136 55 40% 81 60% 44% 56%
Department of CH Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2020
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
% Inuit
Inuit Non‐Inuit Employees % Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit in Staff Non‐Inuit in Staff Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation Housing Allocation Housing Staff Housing Ratio
a b (b/a) c (c/a) d e (e/d) f (f/d) (e/b) (f/c)
Executive 2 2 100% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% 0 0% 0% #DIV/0!
Senior Management 4 2 50% 2 50% 2 1 50% 1 50% 50% 50%
Middle Management 13 10 77% 3 23% 5 3 60% 2 40% 30% 67%
Professional 31 26 84% 5 16% 15 11 73% 4 27% 42% 80%
Paraprofessional 4 3 75% 1 25% 2 2 100% 0 0% 67% 0%
Administrative Support 12 10 85% 2 15% 2 2 100% 0 0% 20% 0%
Casual Healthcare ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
66 53 81% 12.8 19% 26 19 73% 7 27% 36% 55%
Department of CH Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2019
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
Inuit Non‐Inuit Inuit Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Allocation Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation % Allocation % Staff Housing Ratio
Executive 2 2 100% ‐ 0% 2 2 100% ‐ 0% 100% #DIV/0!
Senior Management 4 2 50% 2 50% 3 2 67% 1 33% 100% 50%
Middle Management 12 9 75% 3 25% 4 2 50% 2 50% 22% 67%
Professional 35 30 86% 5 14% 14 10 71% 4 29% 33% 80%
Paraprofessional 5 3 60% 2 40% 2 2 100% ‐ 0% 67% 0%
Administrative Support 14 11 80% 3 20% 2 2 100% ‐ 0% 18% 0%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
72 57 79% 14.8 21% 27 20 74% 7 26% 35% 47%
Department of EDU Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2020
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
% Inuit
Inuit Non‐Inuit Employees % Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit in Staff Non‐Inuit in Staff Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation Housing Allocation Housing Staff Housing Ratio
a b (b/a) c (c/a) d e (e/d) f (f/d) (e/b) (f/c)
Executive 2 1 50% 1 50% ‐ ‐ 0% 0 0% 0% 0%
Senior Management 16 3 19% 13 81% 7 2 29% 5 71% 67% 38%
Middle Management 65 13 20% 52 80% 43 6 14% 37 86% 46% 71%
Professional 709 204 29% 505 71% 437 51 12% 386 88% 25% 76%
Paraprofessional 133 112 84% 22 16% 18 12 67% 6 33% 11% 0%
Administrative Support 252 232 92% 20 8% 22 18 82% 4 18% 8% 21%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
1,177 565 48% 612 52% 527 89 17% 438 83% 16% 72%
Department of EDU Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2019
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
Inuit Non‐Inuit Inuit Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Allocation Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation % Allocation % Staff Housing Ratio
Executive 2 1 50% 1 50% 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% 0% 100%
Senior Management 15 1 7% 14 93% 7 1 14% 6 86% 100% 43%
Middle Management 66 16 24% 50 76% 40 6 15% 34 85% 38% 68%
Professional 676 188 28% 489 72% 424 42 10% 382 90% 22% 78%
Paraprofessional 143 125 87% 19 13% 19 14 74% 5 26% 11% 27%
Administrative Support 256 238 93% 18 7% 21 17 81% 4 19% 7% 23%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
1,158 569 49% 589.75 51% 512 80 16% 432 84% 14% 73%
Department of Health Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2020
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
% Inuit
Inuit Non‐Inuit Employees % Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit in Staff Non‐Inuit in Staff Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation Housing Allocation Housing Staff Housing Ratio
a b (b/a) c (c/a) d e (e/d) f (f/d) (e/b) (f/c)
Executive 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% 3 ‐ 0% 3 100% 0% 300%
Senior Management 20 1 5% 19 95% 15 3 20% 12 80% 300% 63%
Middle Management 72 8 11% 64 89% 63 3 5% 60 95% 38% 94%
Professional 189 18 10% 171 90% 130 7 5% 123 95% 39% 72%
Paraprofessional 86 25 29% 61 71% 48 7 15% 41 85% 28% 67%
Administrative Support 326 293 90% 33 10% 53 44 83% 9 17% 15% 27%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 43 1 2% 42 98% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
694 345 50% 349 50% 355 65 18% 290 82% 19% 83%
Department of Health Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2019
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
Inuit Non‐Inuit Inuit Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Allocation Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation % Allocation % Staff Housing Ratio
Executive 3 ‐ 0% 3 100% 3 ‐ 0% 3 100% 0% 100%
Senior Management 18 2 11% 16 89% 10 1 10% 9 90% 50% 56%
Middle Management 69 6 9% 63 91% 54 3 6% 51 94% 50% 81%
Professional 175 15 9% 160 91% 116 6 5% 110 95% 40% 69%
Paraprofessional 80 20 25% 60 75% 42 4 10% 38 90% 20% 63%
Administrative Support 319 286 90% 33 10% 51 42 82% 9 18% 15% 27%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 55 4 7% 51 93% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
664 329 50% 335 50% 331 60 18% 271 82% 18% 81%
Department of ENV Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2020
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
% Inuit
Inuit Non‐Inuit Employees % Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit in Staff Non‐Inuit in Staff Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation Housing Allocation Housing Staff Housing Ratio
a b (b/a) c (c/a) d e (e/d) f (f/d) (e/b) (f/c)
Executive 2 1 50% 1 50% ‐ ‐ 0% 0 0% 0% 0%
Senior Management 5 1 20% 4 80% 2 ‐ 0% 2 100% 0% 50%
Middle Management 11 3 27% 8 73% 7 ‐ 0% 7 100% 0% 88%
Professional 17 3 18% 14 82% 13 ‐ 0% 13 100% 0% 93%
Paraprofessional 46 28 61% 18 39% 14 9 64% 5 36% 32% 0%
Administrative Support 9 8 89% 1 11% 1 1 100% 0 0% 13% 0%
Casual Healthcare ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 1 1 100% ‐ 0% #DIV/0! 0%
Contractor ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
90 44 49% 46 51% 38 11 29% 27 71% 25% 59%
Department of ENV Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2019
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
Inuit Non‐Inuit Inuit Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Allocation Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation % Allocation % Staff Housing Ratio
Executive 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Senior Management 6 1 17% 5 83% 3 ‐ 0% 3 100% 0% 60%
Middle Management 9 4 44% 5 56% 5 1 20% 4 80% 25% 80%
Professional 21 1 5% 20 95% 16 ‐ 0% 16 100% 0% 80%
Paraprofessional 48 27 56% 21 44% 16 7 44% 9 56% 26% 43%
Administrative Support 8 7 88% 1 13% 2 2 100% ‐ 0% 29% 0%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
93 40 43% 53 57% 42 10 24% 32 76% 25% 60%
Department of CGS Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2020
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
% Inuit
Inuit Non‐Inuit Employees % Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit in Staff Non‐Inuit in Staff Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation Housing Allocation Housing Staff Housing Ratio
a b (b/a) c (c/a) d e (e/d) f (f/d) (e/b) (f/c)
Executive 2 ‐ 0% 2 100% 2 ‐ 0% 2 100% 0% 100%
Senior Management 15 3 20% 12 80% 8 ‐ 0% 8 100% 0% 67%
Middle Management 47 11 23% 36 77% 20 2 10% 18 90% 18% 50%
Professional 77 14 18% 63 82% 39 6 15% 33 85% 43% 52%
Paraprofessional 138 72 52% 66 48% 48 15 31% 33 69% 21% 0%
Administrative Support 39 37 95% 2 5% 6 6 100% 0 0% 16% 0%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
318 137 43% 181 57% 123 29 24% 94 76% 21% 52%
Department of CGS Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2019
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
Inuit Non‐Inuit Inuit Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Allocation Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation % Allocation % Staff Housing Ratio
Executive 2 ‐ 0% 2 100% 3 ‐ 0% 3 100% 0% 150%
Senior Management 14 1 7% 13 93% 5 ‐ 0% 5 100% 0% 38%
Middle Management 43 10 23% 33 77% 20 2 10% 18 90% 20% 55%
Professional 74 16 22% 58 78% 37 7 19% 30 81% 44% 52%
Paraprofessional 114 58 51% 56 49% 41 14 34% 27 66% 24% 48%
Administrative Support 33 30 91% 3 9% 6 6 100% ‐ 0% 20% 0%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
280 115 41% 165 59% 112 29 26% 83 74% 25% 50%
Department of EDT Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2020
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
% Inuit
Inuit Non‐Inuit Employees % Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit in Staff Non‐Inuit in Staff Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation Housing Allocation Housing Staff Housing Ratio
a b (b/a) c (c/a) d e (e/d) f (f/d) (e/b) (f/c)
Executive 2 ‐ 0% 2 100% 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% 0% 50%
Senior Management 11 5 45% 6 55% 3 ‐ 0% 3 100% 0% 50%
Middle Management 16 7 44% 9 56% 5 2 40% 3 60% 29% 33%
Professional 24 13 54% 11 46% 5 2 40% 3 60% 15% 27%
Paraprofessional 22 16 73% 6 27% 7 4 57% 3 43% 25% 0%
Administrative Support 20 17 85% 3 15% 6 6 100% 0 0% 35% 0%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
95 58 61% 37 39% 27 14 52% 13 48% 24% 35%
Department of EDT Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2019
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
Inuit Non‐Inuit Inuit Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Allocation Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation % Allocation % Staff Housing Ratio
Executive 3 1 33% 2 67% 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% 0% 50%
Senior Management 9 6 67% 3 33% 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% 0% 33%
Middle Management 22 9 41% 13 59% 7 2 29% 5 71% 22% 38%
Professional 27 15 56% 12 44% 6 2 33% 4 67% 13% 33%
Paraprofessional 19 14 74% 5 26% 5 4 80% 1 20% 29% 20%
Administrative Support 24 21 88% 3 13% 5 5 100% ‐ 0% 24% 0%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
104 66 63% 38 37% 25 13 52% 12 48% 20% 32%
Department of FS Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2020
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
% Inuit
Inuit Non‐Inuit Employees % Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit in Staff Non‐Inuit in Staff Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation Housing Allocation Housing Staff Housing Ratio
a b (b/a) c (c/a) d e (e/d) f (f/d) (e/b) (f/c)
Executive 2 1 50% 1 50% 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% 0% 100%
Senior Management 9 1 11% 8 89% 5 ‐ 0% 5 100% 0% 63%
Middle Management 20 10 50% 10 50% 13 5 38% 8 62% 50% 80%
Professional 63 21 33% 42 67% 45 14 31% 31 69% 67% 74%
Paraprofessional 73 65 89% 8 11% 17 13 76% 4 24% 20% 0%
Administrative Support 24 23 96% 1 4% 1 1 100% 0 0% 4% 0%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 2 ‐ 0% 2 100% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
190 120 63% 70 37% 84 33 39% 51 61% 27% 73%
Department of FS Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2019
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
Inuit Non‐Inuit Inuit Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Allocation Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation % Allocation % Staff Housing Ratio
Executive 2 1 50% 1 50% 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% 0% 100%
Senior Management 7 1 14% 6 86% 4 ‐ 0% 4 100% 0% 67%
Middle Management 22 11 50% 11 50% 13 4 31% 9 69% 36% 82%
Professional 60 19 32% 41 68% 34 10 29% 24 71% 53% 59%
Paraprofessional 66 59 89% 7 11% 13 10 77% 3 23% 17% 43%
Administrative Support 24 23 96% 1 4% 3 3 100% ‐ 0% 13% 0%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 5 ‐ 0% 5 100% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
181 114 63% 67 37% 73 27 37% 46 63% 24% 69%
Department of NAC Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2020
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
% Inuit
Inuit Non‐Inuit Employees % Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit in Staff Non‐Inuit in Staff Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation Housing Allocation Housing Staff Housing Ratio
a b (b/a) c (c/a) d e (e/d) f (f/d) (e/b) (f/c)
Executive 2 2 100% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% 0 0% 0% 0%
Senior Management 6 2 33% 4 67% 6 2 33% 4 67% 100% 100%
Middle Management 20 10 50% 10 50% 4 1 25% 3 75% 10% 30%
Professional 83 34 41% 49 59% 51 20 39% 31 61% 59% 63%
Paraprofessional 15 10 67% 5 33% 7 5 71% 2 29% 50% 0%
Administrative Support 36 32 89% 4 11% 6 5 83% 1 17% 15% 25%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
162 90 56% 72 44% 74 33 45% 41 55% 37% 57%
Department of NAC Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2019
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
Inuit Non‐Inuit Inuit Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Allocation Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation % Allocation % Staff Housing Ratio
Executive 2 1 50% 1 50% 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% 0% 100%
Senior Management 7 2 29% 5 71% 3 ‐ 0% 3 100% 0% 60%
Middle Management 21 10 48% 11 52% 7 5 71% 2 29% 50% 18%
Professional 90 35 39% 55 61% 50 19 38% 31 62% 54% 56%
Paraprofessional 13 9 69% 4 31% 6 4 67% 2 33% 44% 50%
Administrative Support 29 25 86% 4 14% 4 3 75% 1 25% 12% 25%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
162 82 51% 80 49% 71 31 44% 40 56% 38% 50%
Department of NBCC Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2020
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
% Inuit
Inuit Non‐Inuit Employees % Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit in Staff Non‐Inuit in Staff Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation Housing Allocation Housing Staff Housing Ratio
a b (b/a) c (c/a) d e (e/d) f (f/d) (e/b) (f/c)
Executive ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% 0 0% 0% 0%
Senior Management 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% ‐ ‐ 0% 0 0% 0% 0%
Middle Management ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% 0 0% 0% 0%
Professional 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% ‐ ‐ 0% 0 0% 0% 0%
Paraprofessional 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% ‐ ‐ 0% 0 0% 0% 0%
Administrative Support 1 1 100% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% 0 0% 0% 0%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
4 1 25% 3 75% ‐ ‐ #DIV/0! ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Department of NBCC Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2019
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
Inuit Non‐Inuit Inuit Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Allocation Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation % Allocation % Staff Housing Ratio
Executive ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Senior Management 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Middle Management ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Professional 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Paraprofessional 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% 0% 100%
Administrative Support 1 1 100% ‐ 0% 1 1 100% ‐ 0% 100% 0%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
4 1 25% 3 75% 2 1 50% 1 50% 100% 33%
Department of NHC Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2020
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
% Inuit
Inuit Non‐Inuit Employees % Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit in Staff Non‐Inuit in Staff Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation Housing Allocation Housing Staff Housing Ratio
a b (b/a) c (c/a) d e (e/d) f (f/d) (e/b) (f/c)
Executive 2 1 50% 1 50% 1 1 100% 0 0% 100% 0%
Senior Management 8 2 25% 6 75% 3 ‐ 0% 3 100% 0% 50%
Middle Management 20 4 20% 16 80% 10 ‐ 0% 10 100% 0% 63%
Professional 9 ‐ 0% 9 100% 6 ‐ 0% 6 100% 0% 67%
Paraprofessional 35 17 49% 18 51% 19 7 37% 12 63% 41% 0%
Administrative Support 12 12 100% ‐ 0% 2 2 100% 0 0% 17% 0%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
86 36 42% 50 58% 41 10 24% 31 76% 28% 62%
Department of NHC Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2019
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
Inuit Non‐Inuit Inuit Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Allocation Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation % Allocation % Staff Housing Ratio
Executive 2 1 50% 1 50% 2 1 50% 1 50% 100% 100%
Senior Management 8 1 13% 7 88% 5 ‐ 0% 5 100% 0% 71%
Middle Management 20 4 20% 16 80% 8 ‐ 0% 8 100% 0% 50%
Professional 10 ‐ 0% 10 100% 7 ‐ 0% 7 100% 0% 70%
Paraprofessional 34 14 41% 20 59% 19 6 32% 13 68% 43% 65%
Administrative Support 12 11 92% 1 8% 3 2 67% 1 33% 18% 100%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
86 31 36% 55 64% 44 9 20% 35 80% 29% 64%
Department of QEC Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2020
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
% Inuit
Inuit Non‐Inuit Employees % Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit in Staff Non‐Inuit in Staff Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation Housing Allocation Housing Staff Housing Ratio
a b (b/a) c (c/a) d e (e/d) f (f/d) (e/b) (f/c)
Executive 2 1 50% 1 50% 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% 0% 100%
Senior Management 9 ‐ 0% 9 100% 7 ‐ 0% 7 100% 0% 78%
Middle Management 23 5 22% 18 78% 20 2 10% 18 90% 40% 100%
Professional 87 32 37% 55 63% 66 10 15% 56 85% 31% 102%
Paraprofessional 37 30 81% 7 19% 18 11 61% 7 39% 37% 0%
Administrative Support 22 22 100% ‐ 0% 7 7 100% 0 0% 32% 0%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
180 90 50% 90 50% 119 30 25% 89 75% 33% 99%
Department of QEC Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2019
Employment Status Staff Housing Status
Inuit Non‐Inuit Inuit Non‐Inuit Ratio of Inuit
Filled Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Employees Total SH Inuit Employees Non‐Inuit Allocation Employees in Non‐Inuit
Inuit Allocation Positions Employees % Employees % Allocation Allocation % Allocation % Staff Housing Ratio
Executive 2 1 50% 1 50% 1 ‐ 0% 1 100% 0% 100%
Senior Management 9 ‐ 0% 9 100% 7 ‐ 0% 7 100% 0% 78%
Middle Management 21 5 24% 16 76% 21 3 14% 18 86% 60% 113%
Professional 87 32 37% 55 63% 60 9 15% 51 85% 28% 93%
Paraprofessional 35 28 80% 7 20% 19 11 58% 8 42% 40% 114%
Administrative Support 25 25 100% ‐ 0% 10 10 100% ‐ 0% 40% 0%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0%
Contractor ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
179 91 51% 88 49% 118 33 28% 85 72% 36% 97%
Employees in Staff Housing as of March 31, 2020
by Department and Employment Category
Employment Data
Department # 01 02 03 04 05 08 09 10 11 13 15 17 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Economic
Community Development Nunavut
Office of the Executive and and and Business Nunavut
Legislative Intergovernm Human Culture and Government Transportatio Family Nunavut Credit Housing Qulliq Energy
Department Name Assembly ental Affairs Finance Resources Justice Heritage Education Health Environment Services n Services Total
Arctic College Corporation Corporation Corporation
Total Positions 44.0 85.0 220.0 112.0 398.0 97.8 1,347.7 1,260.9 141.5 455.0 146.0 243.8 250.8 6.0 124.0 209.4 5,142.0
Filled Positions * 34.0 60.0 156.0 73.0 285.0 65.8 1,176.7 695.2 90.0 318.0 95.0 190.3 162.3 4.0 86.0 179.8 3,671.2
Vacant Positions 10.0 25.0 64.0 39.0 113.0 32.0 171.0 565.7 51.5 137.0 51.0 53.5 88.6 2.0 38.0 29.6 1,470.8
Inuit Allocation OLA EIA FIN HR JUS CH EDU HEA ENV CGS EDT FS NAC NBCC NHC QEC Total % of Total % of Total
Executive ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 ‐ 1 0.23% 7.14%
Senior Management ‐ 1 ‐ 2 ‐ 1 2 3 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 ‐ ‐ ‐ 11 2.52% 13.25%
Middle Management ‐ 2 2 6 4 3 6 3 ‐ 2 2 5 1 ‐ ‐ 2 38 8.70% 14.67%
Professional 1 ‐ 2 6 5 11 51 7 ‐ 6 2 14 20 ‐ ‐ 10 135 30.89% 13.53%
Paraprofessional 2 1 7 5 13 2 12 7 9 15 4 13 5 ‐ 7 11 113 25.86% 30.87%
Administrative Support 1 5 4 2 33 2 18 44 1 6 6 1 5 ‐ 2 7 137 31.35% 42.28%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0.46% 4.17%
Contractor ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0.00% 0.00%
4 9 15 21 55 19 89 65 11 29 14 33 33 ‐ 10 30 437 100.00% 26.40%
% of Inuit in Staff Housing 66.7% 60.0% 35.7% 67.7% 37.4% 73.1% 16.9% 18.3% 28.9% 23.6% 51.9% 39.3% 44.6% 0.0% 24.4% 25.2% 26.4%
Non‐Inuit Allocation OLA EIA FIN HR JUS CH EDU HEA ENV CGS EDT FS NAC NBCC NHC QEC Total
Executive ‐ 1 1 ‐ 2 ‐ ‐ 3 ‐ 2 1 1 ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 12 0.99%
Senior Management ‐ 2 2 1 6 1 5 12 2 8 3 5 4 ‐ 3 7 61 5.01%
Middle Management ‐ ‐ 6 ‐ 11 2 37 60 7 18 3 8 3 ‐ 10 18 183 15.02%
Professional 1 2 10 8 21 4 386 123 13 33 3 31 31 ‐ 6 56 728 59.77%
Paraprofessional 1 ‐ 8 1 17 ‐ 6 41 5 33 3 4 2 ‐ 12 7 140 11.49%
Administrative Support ‐ 1 ‐ ‐ 35 ‐ 4 9 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 ‐ ‐ ‐ 50 4.11%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 42 ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 44 3.61%
Contractor 1 ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0.16%
Total 2 6 27 10 92 7 438 290 27 94 13 51 41 ‐ 31 89 1218 100.00%
% of non‐Inuit in Staff Housing 33.3% 40.0% 64.3% 32.3% 62.6% 26.9% 83.1% 81.7% 71.1% 76.4% 48.1% 60.7% 55.4% 0.0% 75.6% 74.8% 73.6%
Total Allocation OLA EIA FIN HR JUS CH EDU HEA ENV CGS EDT FS NAC NBCC NHC QEC Total Total Filled as of March 31, 2020
Executive ‐ 1 1 ‐ 2 ‐ ‐ 3 ‐ 2 1 1 ‐ ‐ 1 1 13 0.79% 27 48%
Senior Management ‐ 3 2 3 6 2 7 15 2 8 3 5 6 ‐ 3 7 72 4.35% 129 56%
Middle Management ‐ 2 8 6 15 5 43 63 7 20 5 13 4 ‐ 10 20 221 13.35% 349 63%
Professional 2 2 12 14 26 15 437 130 13 39 5 45 51 ‐ 6 66 863 52.15% 1,339 64%
Paraprofessional 3 1 15 6 30 2 18 48 14 48 7 17 7 ‐ 19 18 253 15.29% 689 37%
Administrative Support 1 6 4 2 68 2 22 53 1 6 6 1 6 ‐ 2 7 187 11.30% 960 19%
Casual Healthcare ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 43 1 ‐ ‐ 2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 46 2.78% ‐ 0%
Contractor 1 ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0.12% 3,494
Total Employees in Staff Housing 6 15 42 31 147 26 527 355 38 123 27 84 74 ‐ 41 119 1655 100.00% 3,494 47%
% of filled positions with staff 17.6% 25.0% 26.9% 42.5% 51.6% 39.5% 44.8% 51.1% 42.2% 38.7% 28.4% 44.1% 45.6% 0.0% 47.7% 66.2% 45.1%
housing (as of March 31)
Employees not in Staff Housing 28.0 45.0 114.0 42.0 138.0 39.8 649.7 340.2 52.0 195.0 68.0 106.3 88.3 4.0 45.0 60.8 2,016.15
82.4% 75.0% 73.1% 57.5% 48.4% 60.5% 55.2% 48.9% 57.8% 61.3% 71.6% 55.9% 54.4% 100.0% 52.3% 33.8% 54.9%
* Filled Positions as of March 31 Towards a Representative Workforce Report
Potrebbero piacerti anche
- Nunavut: From Vision To Illusion by André LégaréDocumento33 pagineNunavut: From Vision To Illusion by André LégaréNunatsiaqNews100% (1)
- The Turkana County Water Sector Plan Final 23022018Documento48 pagineThe Turkana County Water Sector Plan Final 23022018lex tec0% (1)
- GCV Premium - Calculators - With - New - TPDocumento11 pagineGCV Premium - Calculators - With - New - TPGunjan NimjeNessuna valutazione finora
- 505 Minmi Road Submission Part IDocumento23 pagine505 Minmi Road Submission Part IMatthew Kelly100% (1)
- Bugreport Channel - Amx QPYS30.52 22 14 2022 05 13 14 08 41 Dumpstate - Log 19526Documento19 pagineBugreport Channel - Amx QPYS30.52 22 14 2022 05 13 14 08 41 Dumpstate - Log 19526Serl4xNessuna valutazione finora
- PEC AC44 Talking Points, 10-23-23Documento2 paginePEC AC44 Talking Points, 10-23-23pecvaNessuna valutazione finora
- F6zwe 2016 Jun Q PDFDocumento11 pagineF6zwe 2016 Jun Q PDFGamuchirai KarisinjeNessuna valutazione finora
- Oct. 4, 2021: OPPAGA Report On Longboat Key's Challenges of Being in Two CountiesDocumento34 pagineOct. 4, 2021: OPPAGA Report On Longboat Key's Challenges of Being in Two CountiesMark BerginNessuna valutazione finora
- HULDocumento31 pagineHULAlley excursion designerNessuna valutazione finora
- Terra Repaired FileDocumento19 pagineTerra Repaired Fileshahid hassanNessuna valutazione finora
- Prior Year Item Current Period Cumulative % Change Vs Py % of Sales % of Sales % Change Vs Budget % of Sale % of Sales % Change Vs BudgetDocumento23 paginePrior Year Item Current Period Cumulative % Change Vs Py % of Sales % of Sales % Change Vs Budget % of Sale % of Sales % Change Vs Budgetraghavofficial9677Nessuna valutazione finora
- MBA104 - Almario - Parco - Online Problem Solving 3 Online Quiz Exam 2Documento13 pagineMBA104 - Almario - Parco - Online Problem Solving 3 Online Quiz Exam 2nicolaus copernicusNessuna valutazione finora
- EmployDocumento1 paginaEmployBlanche RyNessuna valutazione finora
- LGU Financial Performance: Bureau of Local Government FinanceDocumento10 pagineLGU Financial Performance: Bureau of Local Government FinanceVeel CreedNessuna valutazione finora
- PerformanceDocumento2 paginePerformanceShyam Sunder Rao ChepurNessuna valutazione finora
- AttritionDocumento26 pagineAttritionMuhammad KaleemNessuna valutazione finora
- Practica Estadistica 1Documento5 paginePractica Estadistica 1arielsanchez92Nessuna valutazione finora
- IFS DJSI Social IndicatorsDocumento4 pagineIFS DJSI Social IndicatorsFranz Evans Cruz ZavalaNessuna valutazione finora
- Pidilite IndustriesDocumento7 paginePidilite IndustriesmuralyyNessuna valutazione finora
- Project Work On Financial Management: Prepared By:-Siddharth S. KothariDocumento22 pagineProject Work On Financial Management: Prepared By:-Siddharth S. Kotharisunilsims2Nessuna valutazione finora
- January 2 National Survey Analysis ESGDocumento16 pagineJanuary 2 National Survey Analysis ESGBreitbart NewsNessuna valutazione finora
- Zimmer 2018 Annual ReportDocumento96 pagineZimmer 2018 Annual ReportmadhurNessuna valutazione finora
- Bharti Airtel DCFDocumento27 pagineBharti Airtel DCFHemant bhanawatNessuna valutazione finora
- UTI Infrastructure Equity FundDocumento16 pagineUTI Infrastructure Equity FundArmstrong CapitalNessuna valutazione finora
- UntitledDocumento2 pagineUntitledGellie Rose PorthreeyesNessuna valutazione finora
- Slide Prihandoko Presentasi Career PathwayDocumento8 pagineSlide Prihandoko Presentasi Career PathwayOkta RinaldiNessuna valutazione finora
- PT Jasa MargaDocumento5 paginePT Jasa MargaRestia NingsihNessuna valutazione finora
- Proximus Consensus Ahead of q1 2023Documento4 pagineProximus Consensus Ahead of q1 2023Laurent MillerNessuna valutazione finora
- Absentism Sick Leave Jan-Jun, 2023Documento8 pagineAbsentism Sick Leave Jan-Jun, 2023priscillalee1921Nessuna valutazione finora
- Asian Paints 1Documento7 pagineAsian Paints 1akaish26Nessuna valutazione finora
- Food Business Share FormulaDocumento4 pagineFood Business Share FormulaDigendra RathoreNessuna valutazione finora
- AR Aging Report (Example)Documento1 paginaAR Aging Report (Example)Titis Endah TrisetyaNessuna valutazione finora
- Acme Inc. 2008 Compensation Analysis: YTD and Jul 08 Department Compensation SpendDocumento1 paginaAcme Inc. 2008 Compensation Analysis: YTD and Jul 08 Department Compensation Spendapi-59140328Nessuna valutazione finora
- Progres Bulanan Pekdum-5Documento1 paginaProgres Bulanan Pekdum-5Zayadi MNessuna valutazione finora
- PT Adhi Karya (Persero) Tbk. 2004-2007: Aktiva LancarDocumento11 paginePT Adhi Karya (Persero) Tbk. 2004-2007: Aktiva LancarFatharani SolihaNessuna valutazione finora
- 68 32 Presentasi Perusahaan Fy 2020 Indicative ResultsDocumento47 pagine68 32 Presentasi Perusahaan Fy 2020 Indicative ResultsIvanNessuna valutazione finora
- Asian Paints v2 1Documento9 pagineAsian Paints v2 1girirajNessuna valutazione finora
- 1.0 Kenyas Public Debt Dr. Abraham RugoDocumento17 pagine1.0 Kenyas Public Debt Dr. Abraham RugoREJAY89Nessuna valutazione finora
- Statistical AnalysisDocumento6 pagineStatistical AnalysisJasmin BernardoNessuna valutazione finora
- Report RajgirDocumento1 paginaReport RajgirAyush JhaNessuna valutazione finora
- Y-O-Y Sales Growth % 25% 14% 16% 11% 5% 6% 12% 14% 5% - 9%: Excel Sheet Made byDocumento9 pagineY-O-Y Sales Growth % 25% 14% 16% 11% 5% 6% 12% 14% 5% - 9%: Excel Sheet Made byKshatrapati SinghNessuna valutazione finora
- Rezolvare Date SaphireDocumento10 pagineRezolvare Date SaphireMaria AnaNessuna valutazione finora
- Non Farm Economy in PakistanDocumento20 pagineNon Farm Economy in PakistanqfarmsNessuna valutazione finora
- Presentation For East West InsuranceDocumento11 paginePresentation For East West Insurancezeeshan aliNessuna valutazione finora
- Clean Edited NAU Quarterly Review Q3 2022 V14Nov2022 TDDocumento4 pagineClean Edited NAU Quarterly Review Q3 2022 V14Nov2022 TDPieter SteenkampNessuna valutazione finora
- DemographicDocumento4 pagineDemographicmarvin9714Nessuna valutazione finora
- Analysts Meeting BM Q2-2019 (LONG FORM)Documento104 pagineAnalysts Meeting BM Q2-2019 (LONG FORM)RadiSujadi24041977Nessuna valutazione finora
- All Staff Briefing PresentationDocumento14 pagineAll Staff Briefing PresentationSummer NorthNessuna valutazione finora
- Aayush Agrawal PGPM-021-002 Disha Vishwakarma PGPM-021-019 Needhi Nagwekar PGPM-021-029 Vaibhav PGPM-021-059Documento24 pagineAayush Agrawal PGPM-021-002 Disha Vishwakarma PGPM-021-019 Needhi Nagwekar PGPM-021-029 Vaibhav PGPM-021-059Needhi NagwekarNessuna valutazione finora
- TWTR Final-Q4'21-Selected-Metrics-and-FinancialsDocumento3 pagineTWTR Final-Q4'21-Selected-Metrics-and-FinancialsBonnie DebbarmaNessuna valutazione finora
- Yearly Rate Schedule For ManpowerDocumento9 pagineYearly Rate Schedule For ManpowerMun Wai KwanNessuna valutazione finora
- CLG ProjDocumento7 pagineCLG ProjNoman AkhtarNessuna valutazione finora
- 2018EmployeeSatisfactionSurveyResultsReport PDFDocumento11 pagine2018EmployeeSatisfactionSurveyResultsReport PDFDini Amalia FauziahNessuna valutazione finora
- Table D. Key Employment Indicators by Sex With Measures of Precision, Philippines February2022f, January2023p and February2023pDocumento5 pagineTable D. Key Employment Indicators by Sex With Measures of Precision, Philippines February2022f, January2023p and February2023pGellie Rose PorthreeyesNessuna valutazione finora
- Comparision of WageDocumento1 paginaComparision of WageMonzurNessuna valutazione finora
- ECA Poultry Business Production & Finance 2022 - UPWORKDocumento240 pagineECA Poultry Business Production & Finance 2022 - UPWORKNilesh SundeshaNessuna valutazione finora
- Kotak Infrastructure and Economic Reform FundDocumento14 pagineKotak Infrastructure and Economic Reform FundArmstrong CapitalNessuna valutazione finora
- Q1 - 2023 24 Investor PresentationDocumento27 pagineQ1 - 2023 24 Investor PresentationashwinsadvayofficialNessuna valutazione finora
- CGEL v2.0Documento68 pagineCGEL v2.0Aayushi ChandwaniNessuna valutazione finora
- Excel Profitabilitas BaruDocumento9 pagineExcel Profitabilitas BaruBayu Frozza HolicNessuna valutazione finora
- Nunavik Housing Needs Survey 2021Documento44 pagineNunavik Housing Needs Survey 2021NunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- Public Guardian and Eaton V Eaton, 2021 NUCJ 21Documento6 paginePublic Guardian and Eaton V Eaton, 2021 NUCJ 21NunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- Application For Authorization - Nunavik Victims of CrimeDocumento18 pagineApplication For Authorization - Nunavik Victims of CrimeNunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- Application For Authorization of A Class ActionDocumento18 pagineApplication For Authorization of A Class ActionNunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- 2021 Nuca 9Documento10 pagine2021 Nuca 9NunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- R Vs EvalikDocumento17 pagineR Vs EvalikNunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- 2021 Nuca 11Documento9 pagine2021 Nuca 11NunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- Qaqqaq Housingreport 2021Documento22 pagineQaqqaq Housingreport 2021NunatsiaqNews0% (1)
- Cour de Justice Du NunavutDocumento12 pagineCour de Justice Du NunavutNunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- Cour de Justice Du NunavutDocumento12 pagineCour de Justice Du NunavutNunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- GN RFP For Inuit and Indigenous Support Addictions Treatment ProgramsDocumento52 pagineGN RFP For Inuit and Indigenous Support Addictions Treatment ProgramsNunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- Jane Doe V Pangnirtung, Nunavut, 2020 NUCJ 48Documento6 pagineJane Doe V Pangnirtung, Nunavut, 2020 NUCJ 48NunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- R. V Pauloosie, 2021 NUCJ 9Documento6 pagineR. V Pauloosie, 2021 NUCJ 9NunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- R. V Choquette, 2021 NUCJ 10Documento13 pagineR. V Choquette, 2021 NUCJ 10NunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- 211FactSheet National NunavutDocumento2 pagine211FactSheet National NunavutNunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- R. V Qirqqut, 2021 NUCJ 4Documento10 pagineR. V Qirqqut, 2021 NUCJ 4NunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- R V Ford, 2021 Nucj 7Documento27 pagineR V Ford, 2021 Nucj 7NunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- R V Akpik, 2021Documento13 pagineR V Akpik, 2021NunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- 210212-08MN053-NIRB LTR Parties Re Draft Extended PH Agenda-OEDEDocumento19 pagine210212-08MN053-NIRB LTR Parties Re Draft Extended PH Agenda-OEDENunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- Mary River Financial SubmissionDocumento10 pagineMary River Financial SubmissionNunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- R. v. Ameralik, 2021 NUCJ 3Documento21 pagineR. v. Ameralik, 2021 NUCJ 3NunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- Cour de Justice Du NunavutDocumento12 pagineCour de Justice Du NunavutNunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- Financial Analysis: Mary River Iron Ore MineDocumento23 pagineFinancial Analysis: Mary River Iron Ore MineNunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- Pond Inlet Announcement On Phase 2 DevelopmentDocumento4 paginePond Inlet Announcement On Phase 2 DevelopmentNunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- R V Audlakiak, 2020 NUCJ 41Documento8 pagineR V Audlakiak, 2020 NUCJ 41NunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- Nauya V R, 2021 Nuca 1Documento9 pagineNauya V R, 2021 Nuca 1NunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- R V Cooper-Flaherty, 2020 NUCJ 43Documento10 pagineR V Cooper-Flaherty, 2020 NUCJ 43NunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- R V Josephee, 2020 NUCJ 40Documento8 pagineR V Josephee, 2020 NUCJ 40NunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- R V Tower Arctic, 2020 NUCJ 39Documento9 pagineR V Tower Arctic, 2020 NUCJ 39NunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- 2322 Welcome BrochureDocumento2 pagine2322 Welcome BrochureuawlocalNessuna valutazione finora
- Airtel CocDocumento20 pagineAirtel CocAsim KhanNessuna valutazione finora
- Meaning of Human Resource Management HRMDocumento3 pagineMeaning of Human Resource Management HRMsarvesh.bharti0% (1)
- May 29, 2015 Strathmore TimesDocumento32 pagineMay 29, 2015 Strathmore TimesStrathmore TimesNessuna valutazione finora
- Anne Business PlanDocumento19 pagineAnne Business PlanAngel SalaganNessuna valutazione finora
- PPMO Standar Bidding DocumentDocumento71 paginePPMO Standar Bidding DocumentMJ KarkiNessuna valutazione finora
- Assignment 1 - CPE 680 - Faris Rahmansyah Nurcahyo - 2020418616Documento11 pagineAssignment 1 - CPE 680 - Faris Rahmansyah Nurcahyo - 2020418616Faris Rahmansya Nurcahyo100% (1)
- Dorsey & Whitney Legal Services ProposalDocumento28 pagineDorsey & Whitney Legal Services ProposalTim Nelson100% (6)
- Planning For The Future: Succession Management What, Why & HowDocumento4 paginePlanning For The Future: Succession Management What, Why & Howetebark h/michaleNessuna valutazione finora
- AICTE CorporateBestPracticesDocumento13 pagineAICTE CorporateBestPracticesramar MNessuna valutazione finora
- Solution Manual For Mcgraw Hills Taxation of Individuals and Business Entities 2020 Edition 11th by SpilkerDocumento37 pagineSolution Manual For Mcgraw Hills Taxation of Individuals and Business Entities 2020 Edition 11th by Spilkeractinozoalionizem7k7100% (23)
- Transport Et Que 2Documento3 pagineTransport Et Que 2solutionlogistiqueNessuna valutazione finora
- HR Business Partner - CourseDocumento55 pagineHR Business Partner - Coursesaptaksamadder4Nessuna valutazione finora
- Relation Between Work Force Diversity and GlobalizationDocumento2 pagineRelation Between Work Force Diversity and GlobalizationSwayam BaglaNessuna valutazione finora
- LRT Construction Ltd. v. Igloolik Housing Association Et Alia, Nunavut Court of JusticeDocumento24 pagineLRT Construction Ltd. v. Igloolik Housing Association Et Alia, Nunavut Court of JusticeNunatsiaqNewsNessuna valutazione finora
- Incentive ManagementDocumento30 pagineIncentive Managementdeepankarrao100% (1)
- K3 Occupational Health ServiceDocumento14 pagineK3 Occupational Health ServiceRara RahmanNessuna valutazione finora
- Recruitment PlanDocumento3 pagineRecruitment Plancreativealley50% (2)
- AnnualDocumento50 pagineAnnualArshia HassanNessuna valutazione finora
- Economics ReviewerDocumento12 pagineEconomics ReviewerAndrea PepitoNessuna valutazione finora
- A Project On StaffingDocumento23 pagineA Project On StaffingPratyush DekaNessuna valutazione finora
- Inter State Migrant WorkersDocumento13 pagineInter State Migrant WorkersSmitha DavidNessuna valutazione finora
- OECD GGR PM SummaryDocumento29 pagineOECD GGR PM SummarymanuremongerNessuna valutazione finora
- San Miguel Corp. Employees Union-PTGWO vs. San Miguel Packaging Products Employees UnionDocumento2 pagineSan Miguel Corp. Employees Union-PTGWO vs. San Miguel Packaging Products Employees UnionNej AdunayNessuna valutazione finora
- Fge Housing Foundation Scheme Situated at Kuri Road (Tamma Mohrian) Zone-4, IslamabadDocumento72 pagineFge Housing Foundation Scheme Situated at Kuri Road (Tamma Mohrian) Zone-4, IslamabadRohail KhanNessuna valutazione finora
- Income Not Part of Total IncomeDocumento47 pagineIncome Not Part of Total IncomeCA Rishabh DaiyaNessuna valutazione finora
- NitishBandivadekar - ProjectReport Social PDFDocumento46 pagineNitishBandivadekar - ProjectReport Social PDFnitishNessuna valutazione finora
- A.C. No. 5305 March 17, 2003 Marciano P. Brion, JR., Petitioner, FRANCISCO F. BRILLANTES, JR., Respondent. Quisumbing, J.Documento10 pagineA.C. No. 5305 March 17, 2003 Marciano P. Brion, JR., Petitioner, FRANCISCO F. BRILLANTES, JR., Respondent. Quisumbing, J.KP Gonzales CabauatanNessuna valutazione finora
- Income From SalariesDocumento48 pagineIncome From Salarieskeerthana_hassan67% (6)
- Farle P. Almodiel vs. National Labor Relations Commission (First Division), Raytheon Phils., Inc. FactsDocumento2 pagineFarle P. Almodiel vs. National Labor Relations Commission (First Division), Raytheon Phils., Inc. FactsMeki100% (1)
