Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Wingler
Berlin Chicago
Translated by Wolfgang Jabs
and Basil Gilbert.
Edited by Joseph Stein.
English adaptation
Copyright @ 1969 by
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology
to Dessau 95
Lyonel Feininger Walter Gropius
From Letters to Julia Feininger, Systematic Preparation for Rational-
February and March 1925 96 ized Housing Construction
xii
Architects' Association "The Ring" Anonymous newspaper report
Statement in Connection with the "Something Metallic"-Bauhaus
Controversy Dr. Nonn-Bauhaus 128 Celebration (1929)
The District Court in Dessau Matinee of the Bauhaus Stage Com-
Verdict in the Case Against Georg pany in Basel (1929)
Buchlein, Merchant, July 29,1927 128 Benno Reifenberg
Prospectus "8 Bauhaus Books" by the The Performance of the "Bauhaus
Albert Langen Press, Munich (1927) 130 Stage Dessau" at the Frankfurt
Laszlo Mo holy-Nagy Schauspiel haus on April 20,1929
The Coming Theater-the Total Howard Dearstyne
Theater 132 Notes on the Psychology Lectures of
Piet Mondrian Dr. Karlfried Count von Dilrckheim
Must Painting be Considered Inferior (1930-1 931)
to Architecture? 133 Joost Schmidt
Wilhelm Lotz On Lettering
On the Design Work of the Metal Ernst Kallai
Workshop of the Dessau Bauhaus 135 Ten Years of Bauhaus
Herbert Bayer Hannes Meyer
Typography and Commercial Art My Expulsion from the Bauhaus. An
Forms 135 Open Letter to Lord Mayor Hesse of
Walter Gropius Dessau
Submission of Resignation to the Court proceedings in the controversy
Magistracy of the City of Dessau 136 Hannes Meyer versus City Council of
Ise Gropius the City of Dessau
Recommended Settlement of Novem-
Gropius Proclaims his Intention to
Resign to the Students 136 ber 5,1930
A student of the Bauhaus Dessau 7 Bauhaus Dessau
Notes on the Announcement of Mies van der Rohe Era 167
Gropius's Intention to Resign
36 City Cpuncil of the City of Dessau-
Anonymous critic Mies van der Rohe
On the Resignation of Professor Employment Contract of Mies van der
Gropius 36 Rohe-August 5,1930 168
Walter Dexel Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Why is Gropius Leaving? (On the The New Age 169
Bau haus Situation)
36 Anonymous
6 Bauhaus Dessau Herr Kandinsky, is it true . . . ? 169
The Hannes Meyer Era 139 Anonymous
Hannes Meyer The new Director! The new Course? 170
Address to the Student Representa- City of Dessau
tives on the Occasion of his Appoint- Budget Estimates for the Bau haus
ment as Director 141 Dessau 1931 and 1932 170
Lyonel Feininger Leftist radical students
Extract of a Letter Dated June 29, Demand for the Abolition of the
1928, to Julia Feininger 141 Preliminary Course 172
Josef Al bers Ludwig Hilberseimer
Creative Education 142 The Minimum Home in a Stairless
House 172
The Bauhaus in Dessau
The Compulsory Basic Design Gunta Stolzl-Sharon
Courses of Albers, Kandinsky, Klee, Utility Textiles of the Bauhaus
Schlemmer, and Schmidt (1928) 144 Weaving Workshop 174
The Bauhaus in Dessau Christof Hertel
Free Painting Course (Kandinsky), The Genesis of Forms-on Klee's
Stage Workshop (Schlemmer), and Theory of Forms 174
Sculpture (Schmidt) 146 M.
Wassily Kandinsky A Swiss Architecture Student Writes
Art Education 147 to a Swiss Architect about the
Bauhaus Dessau 175
Paul Klee
Exact Experiments in the Realm of Art 148 Rightist radical parties in the City
legislature, Dessau
Fannina W. Halle
Dessau, Burg ku hnauer Allee 6-7 150 Motion to Dissolve the Bau haus (1932) 176
The Bauhaus in Dessau Chairman of the City Council repre-
The Course of Training in the Archi- sentatives Hofmann (National Social-
tecture Department 151 ist Party)
WhatWillBecomeoftheBauhaus? 177
Alcar Rudelt's Teaching Program in
Structural Engineering 152 Students of the Bau haus in Dessau
Petition to the Reich President
Hannes Meyer (July 1932) 177
Building 153
Eugen Ohm
Wassily Kandinsky The End of the Bauhaus 178
The Bare Wall . . . 154
Lord Mayor Fritz Hesse
Hubert Hoffmann The Fate of the Bauhaus-a Final
Apartment House or Individual Hour Account 178
Residence? 155
City Council of the City of Dessau-
Interviews of the journal "bauhaus" Mies van der Rohe
with Students of the Bauhaus- Contract of October 5,1932, Con-
Answers by Max Bill and Fritz Kuhr 156 cerning the Termination of ~ ~ ~
ment 179
xiii
Josef Albers . . . The best education is one's own experience. Experimenting surpasses studying. To
Creative Education start out by "playing" develops courage, leads in a natural manner to an inventive way o
From "VI. lnternationaler Kongress fur building and furthers the pedagogically equally important facility of discovery. . . . lnve
Zeichnen, Kunstunterricht und Ange- tiveness is the objective. Invention, and re-invention too, is the essence of all creative
wandte Kunst in Prag, 1928" ("Sixth work (proficiency is a tool and hence is secondary). Instruction in professional technique
International Congress for Drawing, Art hampers inventiveness.. . Pioneers have often started out as nonprofessionals.. .
Education, and Applied Art in Prague, Thus, first we seek contact with the material, the more general, broader field. For that, w
1928"), published in Prague 1931 have the term "feeling for materials." . . . Thus, we give [the students] material to handle.
In this lecture, delivered in Prague in 1928, So that they may "handle" it thoroughly, we take all tools away [from them] if possible.
Albers explains the methods and aims of the We have a good variety of tools and also small machines in our elementary workshop,
workshop training as practiced in the Bauhaus but they are kept away from the students at first, especially at the beginning of a new
preliminary course. Another version of this
lecture was published under the title "Werk- chapter in the work with materials. This forces us to begin thinking and doing on our own
licher Formunterricht" ("Practical form instruc- without introductory instruction, without method, and without tools. And this occurs
tion") in the journal "bauhaus" (Dessau), Vol. 2, extremely easily with unlimited competition.
No. 2/3, 1928. The restriction imposed on the use of tools soon leads to a limitation in the applicability
of materials, so far as these are known. Because something that is known can no longer
be invented. An example: "outside," that is in industry and the crafts, paper is usually
used as a flat sheet and is glued. In that process, one side of the paper often loses its
expressiveness. The edge is hardly ever used.
This induces us to utilize both sides of the paper, in an upright, folded, or sculptural
manner, with emphasis on the edges.
Instead of pasting it, we will put paper together by sewing, buttoning, riveting, typing, an
pinning it; in other words, we fasten it in a multitude of ways. We will test the possibilitie
of its tensile and compression-resistant strength.
In doing this, we do not always create "works of art," but rather experiments; it is not our
ambition to fill museums: we are gathering "experience." Our treatment of materials, th
is intentionally different from that on the "outside." But not on principle. Not in order to
things differently (that would mean paying attention to form); rather we do not want to do
things the way others do them (this means emphasizing the method). That is to say: we d
not want to imitate, we want instead to search on our own, and to learn to find out things
on our own-we want to learn to think constructively.
Later we also glue paper together, but only after we have tried other methods and have
found them to be inadequate.
In order to be even surer of avoiding the use of materials in their known application, we
prefer to work with such materials or constructive elements as have not yet found a usag
or application, or whose treatment is not yet known. For example, we construct with stra
corrugated cardboard, wire mesh, cellophane, stick-on labels, newspapers, wallpaper,
rubber, match-boxes, confetti, phonograph needles, and razor blades.
While experimenting, the students often recognize that presumed innovations are alread
in existence. But there is no harm in that, because the end effect is the experience which
the student has gained for himself and hence is a possession, for he has learned and not
merely been taught.. . .
We know that this learning process through experimentation takes more time, entails
detours and wrong directions. But at the beginning things do not always go right. Walkin
begins with crawling, and speaking with baby talk. And mistakes that are recognized
promote progress. Consciously roundabout ways and controlled mistakes sharpen criti-
cism, teach by experience, and promote the desire to do things better and more accurately.
The experience gained in dabbling with materials is often communicated more easily from
student to student than by the older, further removed teacher. This is the reason for
discussing the work almost daily with the students and having them justify what they
have done.
We require a thorough justification for the selection of the material to be used, the man-
ner of working with it, and the forms which are to be employed. The projects are evaluated
according to the proportion of "effort" to "effect."
Adding two elements must result in more than just the sum of those elements. The result
must also yield at least one relationship. The more these elements strengthen each other,
the more valuable the result, the more effective the project.
Thus, an important aspect of the teaching-economy-is stressed. Economy is under-
stood in the sense of thrift in labor and materials and in the best possible use of these to
achieve the desired effect.
Practical thrift is [realized] by planning [which] is required prior to every construction. . .
New materials will only be approved when their intended application has been justified.
Preliminary tests must be made with the smallest samples, and when dealing with costly
materials they must be carried out with less expensive ones where possible. All materials
should be used with as little waste as possible.
Thrift makes for an emphasis on weightlessness. Volume can be overcome more effec-
tively by the plane. Graphic constructions are of even greater interest. Greatest interest
is evoked by emphasis on the point or the relationship of points.
Interest is further strengthened when mathematical elements [appear] as "negative"
elements, that is to say, as voids or as relationships of scale. This creates much stronger
effects and greater coherence.
Perhaps the only entirely new and probably the most important aspect of today's lang
of forms is the fact that "negative" elements (the remainder, intermediate, andSubtra
quantities) are made active. . . .
Discussions of the terms positive and active, negative and passive, provides an opportu-
nity to explain the sociological origins of our form language.
Placing the same value on "positive" and "negative" elements makes it impossible for
something to remain "left over". . . We no longer differentiate essentially between those
142
elements which are "carrying" and those which are "carried," between those "serving"
and those "served." Every element or component must be one that is "aiding" and
"aided" at the same time, it must be both supporting and supported. Thus the frame and
the base, which must "raise" an object, become superfluous. We will get rid of the "mon-
ument" which, on a big supporting base, carries but a small supported object.
If in a form there is something that is not utilized, then the calculation has been wrong, for
coincidence then plays a part and that is unjustified and unjustifiable. Moreover, it is
senseless because it usually results from habit.
Thrift.. . is sought by testing the maximum strength of the material (maximum height and
width of the construction and highest stress), the maximum resistance to tensile and
bending stresses, the closest connections, the smallest and weakest base. . . Increasing
the stress to the point of failure of the material shows where the stress limit is and leads
us to use related or else opposite materials. Thus arises. . . the wish to combine and mix
various materials in order to enhance their properties. . .
Learning in this way, with emphasis on technical and economical rather than esthetic
considerations, results in static and dynamic attitudes; it demonstrates the links between
organic and technical properties, while negating their opposition. Apart from leading to
thinking in terms of building and construction, it trains the rarer quality of spatial imagina-
tion. It provides for the friendly and collective interchange of experiences and [produces]
agreement on general and contemporary principles of form-it counteracts the exag-
geration of individualism without hampering real individuality.
lndividualism is not primarily a school concern, for individualism stresses particularity
and separateness. It is the task of the school to integrate the individual into the society
and the economy and to have him partake in the activities of his time. The cultivation of
individuality is the individual's task and not that of collective enterprise as represented by
the school. The school should cultivate individuals passively-by not interfering with
personal development. . . . Sociological economy has to reject the personality cult of the
current educational system. Productive individuality asserts itself without and despite
school education.
We come now to a different, more formal and freer area of experimentation, to the so-
called exercises with "matter." These alternate repeatedly during the semester with the
material exercises. The exercises with matter are not concerned with the inner qualities
of the material but rather with its external appearance. The relationships of the epidermis,
the skin, of the material are explored-according to relatedness or contrast. "Like attracts
like" and "opposites attract one another.'' Just as one color influences another by timbre,
interval, tone, and tension, so surface qualities, visual or tactilely experienced (with the
fingertips), can be related. Just as green and red are complementary to each other, hence
are both contrast and balance, so bricks and burlap, glass and wax, aluminum foil and
wool, cotton and thumbtacks relate to each other.
We classify the kinds of surfaces according to their structure, facture, and texture. They
are used by being painted rather than in material construction^, so that spatial qualities,
intersections, mixing, and interpenetration occur by illusion.
[The special interest in the exploration of "matter" appeared during the epochs which
were particularly oriented toward structure; it has] been almost completely lost since the
Gothic era. At that time one still knew how to combine wood with iron and color, [or] stone
and glass and color, until the Renaissance began to build facades entirely of one material,
and garments continued entirely in one type of fabric.
[Furthermore] we are translating and producing factures and structures. The group dis-
cussions of the results of the exercises induce accurate observation and a new way of
"seeing." These discussions show which formal qualities predominate today-harmony
or balance, rhythm or scale, geometric or arithmetric proportion, symmetry or asym-
metry, rosette or row-and in conjunction with that, what holds more interest-compli-
cated or elementary form, multiplicity or simplicity, composition or construction,
mysticism or hygiene, volume or line, beauty or prudence, ancestral portraits or toilets.
The. . . inductive method of instruction attempts to develop responsibility and self-
discipline-toward ourselves, the material, and the work. By letting the student work
with different materials and tools and by having him visit different industries, this teaching
method helps him find the areas of work and the kind of materials that suit him best, and
eventually determines his selection of a vocation . . . It attempts to be a training in flex-
ibility providing the broadest possible [nontechnical] basis in order not to let later
specialization be isolated. It wants to lead to economical form.
This method stands in contrast to that of vocational school training which "inculcates"
manual skills. . . . If one does "a bit o f " cabinetmaker's work, "a bit o f " tailoring, and
"a bit o f " bookbinding, one arrives at dilletantism in the bad sense of the word. . . "Also"
sawing, "also" planing (the most difficult work in the cabinetmaker's shop), and "also"
cutting cardboard and gluing remain unproductive, because these activities do nothing
but keep one occupied. They do not satisfy the creative urge.
Thus: no "fiddling around" but building.. . .