Sei sulla pagina 1di 16

Electronically Filed

2/17/2020 10:36 AM
Steven D. Grierson
CLERK OF THE COURT

1 COMP
ADAM J. BREEDEN, ESQ.
2 Nevada Bar No. 008768
BREEDEN & ASSOCIATES, PLLC
3 376 E. Warm Springs Road, Suite 120 CASE NO: A-20-810590-C
Las Vegas, Nevada 89119
4 Phone: (702) 819-7770 Department 24
Fax: (702) 819-7771
5 Adam@Breedenandassociates.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6

7 EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

8 CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

9 DIAMOND ROSE, individually and as CASE NO.


Special Administrator of the Estate of
10 BRIANA JA’NAE BRADFORD, a minor DEPT NO.
deceased; and BRIAN BRADFORD,
11 individually,
COMPLAINT
12 Plaintiffs,
Arbitration Exempt- Professional
13 v. Negligence/Medical Malpractice/Wrongful
Death Case Chapter 41A
14 SUMMERLIN HOSPITAL MEDICAL
CENTER, LLC, a foreign limited liability
15 company; MARTIN N. LEE, M.D., an

16 individual; MEADOWS HEALTHCARE,


LLC, a Nevada limited liability company;
17 GARY S. MCLAUGHLIN, M.D., an
individual; EMCARE PHYSICIANS
18 PROVIDERS, INC., a foreign corporation;
FARAZ M. NOROZIAN, M.D., an individual;
19 EDMUND R. GOROZA, M.D., an individual;

20 POKROY MEDICAL GROUP OF NEVADA,


LTD. d/b/a PEDIATRIX MEDICAL GROUP
21 OF NEVADA, a Nevada limited liability
company; DOES I through X; and ROE
22 CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive,

23 Defendants.
24

25 COMES NOW Plaintiffs, DIAMOND ROSE and BRIAN BRADFORD, by and through
26 their counsel, Adam J. Breeden, Esq. of BREEDEN & ASSOCIATES, PLLC, and for their
27 Complaint against the Defendants allege as follows:

28

Case Number: A-20-810590-C


1 PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE

2 1. Plaintiff, DIAMOND ROSE (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Plaintiff” and/or

3 “Ms. Rose”) is a resident and citizen of the State of Nevada, County of Clark, and was at all times

4 relevant to this Complaint.

5 2. Plaintiff ROSE also brings this action in her capacity as the Special Administrator of

6 the Estate of Briana J. Bradford, deceased.

7 3. Plaintiff, BRIAN BRADFORD (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Plaintiff”

8 and/or “Mr. Bradford”) is a resident and citizen of the State of Nevada, County of Clark, and was at

9 all times relevant to this Complaint.

10 4. Defendant, SUMMERLIN HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC (hereinafter

11 collectively referred to as “Defendant” and/or “Summerlin”) is and was a foreign limited-liability

12 company duly authorized to do and doing business in the County of Clark, State of Nevada at all

13 times relevant to this Complaint.

14 5. Defendant, MARTIN NICHOLAS LEE, M.D. (hereinafter referred to as “Dr. Lee”)

15 is and was a physician, with a specialty in pediatrics, and provider of health care licensed to practice

16 medicine within the State of Nevada as defined by NRS § 630.014, NRS § 630.020 and NRS §

17 41A.017, and was a medical care provider to Briana at all times relevant to this Complaint.

18 6. Defendant, MEADOWS HEALTHCARE, LLC (hereinafter collectively referred to

19 as “Defendant” and/or “Meadows Healthcare”) is and was a Nevada limited-liability company duly

20 authorized to do and doing business in the County of Clark, State of Nevada at all times relevant to

21 this Complaint.

22 7. Defendant, GARY MCLAUGHLIN, M.D. (hereinafter referred to as

23 “Dr. McLaughlin”) is and was a physician, with a specialty in emergency medicine, and provider of

24 health care licensed to practice medicine within the State of Nevada as defined by NRS § 630.014,

25 NRS § 630.020 and NRS § 41A.017, and was a medical care provider to Briana at all times relevant

26 to this Complaint.
27 8. Defendant, EMCARE PHYSICIANS PROVIDERS, INC. (hereinafter collectively

28 referred to as “Defendant” and/or “Emcare”) is and was a foreign limited-liability company duly

2
1 authorized to do and doing business in the County of Clark, State of Nevada at all times relevant to

2 this Complaint.

3 9. Defendant, FARAZ NOROZIAN, M.D. (hereinafter referred to as “Dr. Norozian”)

4 is and was a physician, with specialties in pediatrics and critical care, and provider of health care

5 licensed to practice medicine within the State of Nevada as defined by NRS § 630.014, NRS §

6 630.020 and NRS § 41A.017, and was a medical care provider to Briana at all times relevant to this

7 Complaint.

8 10. Defendant, EDMUND GOROZA, M.D. (hereinafter referred to as “Dr. Goroza”) is

9 and was a physician, with specialties in pediatrics and critical care, and provider of health care

10 licensed to practice medicine within the State of Nevada as defined by NRS § 630.014, NRS §

11 630.020 and NRS § 41A.017, and was a medical care provider to Briana at all times relevant to this

12 Complaint.

13 11. Defendant, POKROY MEDICAL GROUP OF NEVADA, LTD. d/b/a PEDIATRIX

14 MEDICAL GROUP OF NEVADA (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Defendant” and/or

15 “Pediatrix”) is and was a Nevada limited-liability company duly authorized to do and doing business

16 in the County of Clark, State of Nevada at all times relevant to this Complaint.

17 12. The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate, or otherwise,

18 of Defendants DOES I through X and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, are unknown

19 to the Plaintiff, who therefore sues these defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiff is informed

20 and believes and thereon alleges that each of the Defendants designated herein as a Does I through

21 X, inclusive, and/or Roe Corporations I through X, inclusive, is responsible in some manner for the

22 events and happenings referred to herein, and caused injury and damages proximately thereby to

23 Plaintiff as herein alleged, and Plaintiff will ask leave of this Court to amend this Complaint to insert

24 the true names and capacities of Defendants, DOES and/or ROE CORPORATIONS, when the same

25 have been ascertained by Plaintiff, together with appropriate charging allegations, and adjoin such

26 Defendants in this action.


27 13. Using due diligence, Plaintiffs have identified what they believe are the legal entities

28 for which the Defendant physicians were agents for at the time of the events alleged herein.

3
1 However, there may be legal entities, business relationships, contracts or agencies unknown to

2 Plaintiffs at present, who thereby designate ROES I, II, III and IV as the unknown legal entities who

3 are responsible for the acts of doctors Lee, McLaughlin, Goroza and Norozian, respectively.

4 14. This Court has personal jurisdiction over the Defendants because they are residents

5 of the State of Nevada or have minimum contacts with the state of Nevada under NRS § 14.065.

6 15. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Nev. Const.

7 Art. VI, § 6 and NRS § 4.370(1), as this Court has original jurisdiction in all cases not assigned to

8 the justices’ courts and the amount in controversy exceeds $15,000, exclusive of attorney’s fees,

9 interest, and costs.

10 16. All the facts and circumstances that give rise to this dispute and lawsuit occurred in

11 Clark County, Nevada, making venue in the Eighth Judicial District the appropriate venue.

12 17. This is an action for professional negligence as defined by NRS § 41A.015. This

13 action falls under the scope of NRS Chapter 41A and pursuant to NRS § 41A.071 is supported by

14 the attached affidavits of Dr. Alan Nager, Dr. Nicholas Saenz and Dr. H. Michael Worthen,

15 physicians in the same or substantially similar area of practice as the Defendants. A copy of

16 Dr. Nager’s supporting declaration and report is attached as Exhibit “1” to this Complaint. A copy

17 of Dr. Saenz’ supporting declaration and report is attached as Exhibit “2” to this Complaint. A

18 copy of Dr. Worthen’s supporting declaration and report is attached as Exhibit “3” to this

19 Complaint.

20 ALLEGATIONS COMMON TO ALL COUNTS

21 18. Plaintiffs Diamond Rose and Brian Branford are the natural parents of Briana

22 Bradford, deceased.

23 19. On February 9, 2019, Briana Bradford celebrated her seventh (7th) birthday with

24 family and friends as a happy, healthy young girl with her whole life ahead of her. Incredibly, she

25 would be dead within 10 days.

26 20. On February 16, 2019, Briana was taken to the Summerlin Hospital Emergency
27 Department with pain in the lower right quadrant, nausea and vomiting.

28

4
1 21. On further evaluation at Summerlin Hospital, Briana’s condition should have been

2 interpreted as very serious as she had clear signs of an ongoing abdominal infection and dehydration

3 secondary to infection, including abdominal pain and tenderness, nausea, vomiting, tachycardia

4 (high heart rate), hypotension (low blood pressure), hematocrit 59%, BUN 39, Creatinine 1.04,

5 TCO2 17, WBC 24,230 and urine specific gravity 1.045.

6 22. Despite these incredibly serious symptoms, vital signs and laboratory results, her

7 care can be described as “too little, too late” with Briana’s care showing no urgency and being

8 insufficient to address her condition regardless.

9 23. Although fluid resuscitation treatment is critical and the standard of care for

10 treatment of abdominal infection or sepsis requires such treatment, Briana received insufficient fluid

11 therapy, her weight and fluid intake/output was not properly recorded to even begin to allow for

12 sufficient fluid therapy, and her fluid therapy was not titrated to effect to control her vital signs.

13 24. Although adequate antibiotic treatment is critical and the standard of care for

14 treatment of abdominal infection or sepsis requires such treatment, Briana was only administered

15 ceftriaxone which by itself done not address all abdominal infections. The first documented

16 administration of ceftriaxone is 22 hours after presentation, well beyond the 1-2 hour standard of

17 care, and despite having no reaction to ceftriaxone an infectious diseases doctor was not consulted

18 nor were alternate antibiotics considered or administered.

19 25. Although adequate source control is critical and the standard of care for treatment of

20 abdominal infection or sepsis requires such treatment, no pediatric surgeon was consulted and no

21 surgery to explore the abdomen and find the source of the infection or irrigate the abdomen, which

22 had ascites, occurred during Briana’s lifetime.

23 26. As other examples of the type of insufficient care she received, Briana sat for hours

24 in the ER and hospital without care. Just as one of many examples of this, while Briana sat dying

25 of infection in Summerlin Hospital, no care of any kind for her is recorded for four hours after her

26 hospital admission. There is no record that the ER doctor spoke to the intensivist about this critical
27 patient upon admission to the hospital. Despite serious symptoms, vitals and lab results in this child,

28 there was no urgency to Briana’s care and her case does not appear to have been taken seriously.

5
1 Vitals were infrequently recorded with little response to her serious tachycardia and hypotension

2 which persisted throughout her hospital course. Although Briana should have been admitted directly

3 into the PICU, she was instead sent to the hospital floor and received less attention. There is no

4 record of any order for an antibiotic for twenty hours after presentation and, despite the fact that

5 Briana was dying of an infection, it took staff two hours past the time the antibiotic was ordered to

6 actually administer it. It took 10 hours to get a CT of a child who clearly had a serious abdominal

7 infection. Concerning vitals such as an extremely high heart rate but extremely low blood pressure

8 was recorded and then not monitored further for hours at a time despite a lack of improvement. Her

9 fluid intake and output were not carefully monitored, and her weight is not even recorded, which

10 would make it impossible to properly treat her with fluids. This is a girl who was left to die, despite

11 all warning signs. No one seemed to take her case seriously, the ultimate insult being Dr. Lee’s note

12 when Briana was discharged from the ER that her condition had “improved.” Perhaps nothing better

13 exemplifies the type of substandard care Briana received than writing in the chart of a seven year

14 old girl--who would die in approximately 8 hours who you have failed to properly diagnose,

15 properly administer treatment, or address her serious vitals and lab results--that she has “improved.”

16 27. Briana sat in Summerlin Hospital being left uncared for and unmonitored for hours

17 at a time while she bravely fought for her life despite being in a hospital full of doctors, nurses and

18 modern medical care that could have easily saved her had proper treatment been administered.

19 28. After approximately 35 hours at Summerlin Hospital, Briana Bradford died of her

20 abdominal infection at 3:45 a.m. on February 18, 2019.

21 FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

22 (Corporate Negligence – Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLC)

23 29. Plaintiffs hereby re-state and re-allege each and every preceding paragraph of the

24 Complaint as if fully restated herein.

25 30. As a hospital, Summerlin Hospital owed a duty of care to Plaintiffs and the decedent

26 to use reasonable care to properly staff, credential and hire at its hospital, provide education and
27 training, and properly supervise those working out of its hospital, regardless of whether those

28 persons were direct employees of the hospital, independent contractors or some other form of agent.

6
1 31. Summerlin Hospital breached its duty to properly hire, educate, train and supervise

2 those working at its hospital.

3 32. As a result of said breach, Briana Bradford received improper care and died.

4 33. As a direct and proximate cause of the acts of the Defendants, Plaintiffs have

5 sustained damages in an amount to be determined at trial but exceeding $15,000.

6 34. That Plaintiffs have been required to retain an attorney to prosecute their case and

7 Defendants are liable for all attorney’s fees, costs and interest incurred.

8 SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

9 (Professional Negligence – Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLC)

10 35. Plaintiffs hereby re-state and re-allege each and every preceding paragraph of the

11 Complaint as if fully restated herein.

12 36. While at Summerlin Hospital and leading up to her death, Briana Bradford was

13 provided medical care by various nurses and staff who were direct employees of Summerlin

14 Hospital, including but not limited to: Marizel Yukee, RN, Jonathon Berkabile, RN, Amy

15 Bergstrom, RN, Karla Welch, RN, Dana Ernsberger, RN, Alicia Garcia, RN, Alicia Garcia, RN,

16 Melissa Benkovich, RN, Ashley Escuriex, RN, Traci Dufour, RN, and Isabel Gonzales, RN.

17 37. These nurses and staff failed, in rendering health care services, to use the reasonable

18 care, skill or knowledge ordinarily used under similar circumstances by similarly trained and

19 experienced providers of health care.

20 38. More specifically but without limitation, the staff/nurses at Summerlin Hospital fell

21 below the standard of care in at least the following ways: (a) record keeping was insufficient, (b)

22 the patient’s weight was not recorded to allow proper fluid administration, (c) the patient’s fluid

23 input and output was not recorded to allow proper fluid administration, (d) the patient was admitted

24 to the pediatric floor as opposed to the PICU, as ordered, when transferred from the Emergency

25 Department, (e) there are long periods of time or “gaps” in the medical records where no care or

26 vital signs are being taken of the patient by nurses, (f) failing to timely administer the treatment that
27 was ordered by the physicians, and (g) there was no nurse advocacy for this patient despite

28 prolonged, serious vital signs and a lack of improvement.

7
1 39. In addition to or in alternative to professional negligence, the actions of the staff and

2 nurses were undertaken knowingly, wantonly, willfully, maliciously and/or with extreme conscious

3 disregard.

4 40. In addition to or in alternative to professional negligence, the conduct was despicable

5 and so contemptable that it would be looked down upon and despised by ordinary decent people and

6 was carried on with willful and conscious disregard for the safety of Briana Bradford.

7 41. In addition to or in alternative to professional negligence, the outrageous and

8 unconscionable conduct warrants an award of exemplary and punitive damages under NRS § 42.005

9 in an amount appropriate to punish and make an example of the Defendant and to deter similar

10 conduct in the future.

11 42. As a result of said acts or omissions of the staff and nurses and breaches of the

12 standard of care, Briana Bradford died.

13 43. At the time the staff and nurses administered care to Briana Bradford, they were the

14 actual, apparent, implied or ostensible agent of Defendant Summerlin Hospital Medical Center,

15 LLC. Therefore, Defendant Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLC is responsible for the

16 injuries, pain, suffering and death of Briana Bradford under the theory of respondeat superior, NRS

17 § 41.130 and to the extent applicable NRS § 42.007.

18 44. As a direct and proximate cause of the acts of the Defendants, Plaintiffs have

19 sustained damages in an amount to be determined at trial but exceeding $15,000.

20 45. That Plaintiffs have been required to retain an attorney to prosecute their case and

21 Defendants are liable for all attorney’s fees, costs and interest incurred.

22 THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

23 (Professional Negligence – Martin N. Lee, M.D., Meadows Healthcare, LLC & Summerlin
Hospital Medical Center, LLC)
24

25 46. Plaintiffs hereby re-state and re-allege each and every preceding paragraph of the

26 Complaint as if fully restated herein.


27 47. While at Summerlin Hospital ED and leading up to her death, Briana Bradford was

28 provided medical care by Dr. Martin Lee.

8
1 48. Dr. Lee failed, in rendering health care services, to use the reasonable care, skill or

2 knowledge ordinarily used under similar circumstances by similarly trained and experienced

3 providers of health care.

4 49. More specifically but without limitation, Dr. Lee (a) failed to promptly administer

5 adequate antibiotic therapy, (b) failed to administer adequate fluid therapy, (c) failed throughout the

6 ED stay to properly monitor and interpret vital signs, (d) failed to properly diagnoses the patient

7 and/or adjust his differential diagnosis despite the patient’s failure to improve, (e) failed to assure

8 the patient’s transfer to the PICU or discuss her case with the hospital physicians assuming the

9 patient’s care, and (f) generally failed to urgently recognize and treat the serious abdominal infection

10 and/or related conditions of the patient.

11 50. In addition to or in alternative to professional negligence, the actions of Dr. Lee were

12 undertaken knowingly, wantonly, willfully, maliciously and/or with extreme conscious disregard.

13 51. In addition to or in alternative to professional negligence, Dr. Lee’s conduct was

14 despicable and so contemptable that it would be looked down upon and despised by ordinary decent

15 people and was carried on with willful and conscious disregard for the safety of Briana Bradford.

16 52. In addition to or in alternative to professional negligence, Dr. Lee’s outrageous and

17 unconscionable conduct warrants an award of exemplary and punitive damages under NRS § 42.005

18 in an amount appropriate to punish and make an example of the Defendant and to deter similar

19 conduct in the future.

20 53. As a result of said acts or omissions of Dr. Lee and breaches of the standard of care,

21 Briana Bradford died.

22 54. At the time Dr. Lee administered care to Briana Bradford, he was the actual,

23 apparent, implied or ostensible agent of Defendant Meadows Healthcare, LLC and/or ROE I.

24 Therefore, Defendant Meadows Healthcare, LLC and/or ROE I is responsible for the injuries, pain,

25 suffering and death of Briana Bradford under the theory of respondeat superior, NRS § 41.130 and

26 to the extent applicable NRS § 42.007.


27 55. At the time Dr. Lee administered care to Briana Bradford, he was the actual,

28 apparent, implied or ostensible agent of Defendant Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLC.

9
1 Therefore, Defendant Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLC is responsible for the injuries, pain,

2 suffering and death of Briana Bradford under the theory of respondeat superior, NRS § 41.130 and

3 to the extent applicable NRS § 42.007.

4 56. As a direct and proximate cause of the acts of the Defendants, Plaintiffs have

5 sustained damages in an amount to be determined at trial but exceeding $15,000.

6 57. That Plaintiffs have been required to retain an attorney to prosecute their case and

7 Defendants are liable for all attorney’s fees, costs and interest incurred.

8 FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION

9 (Professional Negligence – Gary McLaughlin, M.D., Emcare Physicians Providers, Inc. &
Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLC)
10

11 58. Plaintiffs hereby re-state and re-allege each and every preceding paragraph of the

12 Complaint as if fully restated herein.

13 59. While at Summerlin Hospital ED and leading up to her death, Briana Bradford was

14 provided medical care by Dr. Gary McLaughlin.

15 60. Dr. McLaughlin failed, in rendering health care services, to use the reasonable care,

16 skill or knowledge ordinarily used under similar circumstances by similarly trained and experienced

17 providers of health care.

18 61. More specifically but without limitation, Dr. McLaughlin (a) failed to promptly

19 administer adequate antibiotic therapy, (b) failed to administer adequate fluid therapy, (c) failed

20 throughout the ED stay to properly monitor and interpret vital signs, (d) failed to properly diagnoses

21 the patient and/or adjust his differential diagnosis despite the patient’s failure to improve, (e) failed

22 to assure the patient’s transfer to the PICU or discuss her case with the hospital physicians assuming

23 the patient’s care, and (f) generally failed to urgently recognize and treat the serious abdominal

24 infection and/or related conditions of the patient.

25 62. In addition to or in alternative to professional negligence, the actions of

26 Dr. McLaughlin were undertaken knowingly, wantonly, willfully, maliciously and/or with extreme
27 conscious disregard.

28 63. In addition to or in alternative to professional negligence, Dr. McLaughlin’s conduct

10
1 was despicable and so contemptable that it would be looked down upon and despised by ordinary

2 decent people and was carried on with willful and conscious disregard for the safety of Briana

3 Bradford.

4 64. In addition to or in alternative to professional negligence, Dr. McLaughlin’s

5 outrageous and unconscionable conduct warrants an award of exemplary and punitive damages

6 under NRS § 42.005 in an amount appropriate to punish and make an example of the Defendant and

7 to deter similar conduct in the future.

8 65. As a result of said acts or omissions of Dr. McLaughlin and breaches of the standard

9 of care, Briana Bradford died.

10 66. At the time Dr. McLaughlin administered care to Briana Bradford, he was the actual,

11 apparent, implied or ostensible agent of Defendant Emcare Physicians Providers, Inc. and/or ROE

12 II. Therefore, Defendant Emcare Physicians Providers, Inc. and/or ROE II is responsible for the

13 injuries, pain, suffering and death of Briana Bradford under the theory of respondeat superior, NRS

14 § 41.130 and to the extent applicable NRS § 42.007.

15 67. At the time Dr. McLaughlin administered care to Briana Bradford, he was the actual,

16 apparent, implied or ostensible agent of Defendant Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLC.

17 Therefore, Defendant Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLC is responsible for the injuries, pain,

18 suffering and death of Briana Bradford under the theory of respondeat superior, NRS § 41.130 and

19 to the extent applicable NRS § 42.007.

20 68. As a direct and proximate cause of the acts of the Defendants, Plaintiffs have

21 sustained damages in an amount to be determined at trial but exceeding $15,000.

22 69. That Plaintiffs have been required to retain an attorney to prosecute their case and

23 Defendants are liable for all attorney’s fees, costs and interest incurred.

24 FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION

25 (Professional Negligence – Edmund Goroza, M.D., Pokroy Medical Group of Nevada, Ltd. &
Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLC)
26
27 70. Plaintiffs hereby re-state and re-allege each and every preceding paragraph of the

28 Complaint as if fully restated herein.

11
1 71. While at Summerlin Hospital and leading up to her death, Briana Bradford was

2 provided medical care by Dr. Edmund Goroza.

3 72. Dr. Goroza failed, in rendering health care services, to use the reasonable care, skill

4 or knowledge ordinarily used under similar circumstances by similarly trained and experienced

5 providers of health care.

6 73. More specifically but without limitation, Dr. Goroza (a) failed to promptly

7 administer adequate antibiotic therapy, (b) failed to administer adequate fluid therapy, (c) failed

8 throughout the hospital stay to properly monitor and interpret vital signs, (d) failed to properly

9 diagnoses the patient and/or adjust his differential diagnosis despite the patient’s failure to improve,

10 (e) failed to assure the patient’s transfer to the PICU or discuss her case with other hospital

11 physicians, and (f) generally failed to urgently recognize and treat the serious abdominal infection

12 and/or related conditions of the patient.

13 74. In addition to or in alternative to professional negligence, the actions of Dr. Goroza

14 were undertaken knowingly, wantonly, willfully, maliciously and/or with extreme conscious

15 disregard.

16 75. In addition to or in alternative to professional negligence, Dr. Goroza’s conduct was

17 despicable and so contemptable that it would be looked down upon and despised by ordinary decent

18 people and was carried on with willful and conscious disregard for the safety of Briana Bradford.

19 76. In addition to or in alternative to professional negligence, Dr. Goroza’s outrageous

20 and unconscionable conduct warrants an award of exemplary and punitive damages under NRS

21 § 42.005 in an amount appropriate to punish and make an example of the Defendant and to deter

22 similar conduct in the future.

23 77. As a result of said acts or omissions of Dr. Goroza and breaches of the standard of

24 care, Briana Bradford died.

25 78. At the time Dr. Goroza administered care to Briana Bradford, he was the actual,

26 apparent, implied or ostensible agent of Defendant Pokroy Medical Group of Nevada, Ltd. d/b/a
27 Pediatrix Medical Group of Nevada and/or ROE III. Therefore, Defendant Pokroy Medical Group

28 of Nevada, Ltd. d/b/a Pediatrix Medical Group of Nevada and/or ROE III is responsible for the

12
1 injuries, pain, suffering and death of Briana Bradford under the theory of respondeat superior, NRS

2 § 41.130 and to the extent applicable NRS § 42.007.

3 79. At the time Dr. Goroza administered care to Briana Bradford, he was the actual,

4 apparent, implied or ostensible agent of Defendant Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLC.

5 Therefore, Defendant Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLC is responsible for the injuries, pain,

6 suffering and death of Briana Bradford under the theory of respondeat superior, NRS § 41.130 and

7 to the extent applicable NRS § 42.007.

8 80. As a direct and proximate cause of the acts of the Defendants, Plaintiffs have

9 sustained damages in an amount to be determined at trial but exceeding $15,000.

10 81. That Plaintiffs have been required to retain an attorney to prosecute their case and

11 Defendants are liable for all attorney’s fees, costs and interest incurred.

12 SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION

13 (Professional Negligence – Faraz Norozian, M.D., Pokroy Medical Group of Nevada, Ltd. &
Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLC)
14

15 82. Plaintiffs hereby re-state and re-allege each and every preceding paragraph of the

16 Complaint as if fully restated herein.

17 83. While at Summerlin Hospital and leading up to her death, Briana Bradford was

18 provided medical care by Dr. Faraz Norozian.

19 84. Dr. Norozian failed, in rendering health care services, to use the reasonable care, skill

20 or knowledge ordinarily used under similar circumstances by similarly trained and experienced

21 providers of health care.

22 85. More specifically but without limitation, Dr. Norozian (a) failed to promptly

23 administer adequate antibiotic therapy, (b) failed to administer adequate fluid therapy, (c) failed

24 throughout the hospital stay to properly monitor and interpret vital signs, (d) failed to properly

25 diagnoses the patient and/or adjust his differential diagnosis despite the patient’s failure to improve,

26 (e) failed to assure the patient’s transfer to the PICU or discuss her case with other hospital
27 physicians, and (f) generally failed to urgently recognize and treat the serious abdominal infection

28 and/or related conditions of the patient.

13
1 86. In addition to or in alternative to professional negligence, the actions of Dr. Norozian

2 were undertaken knowingly, wantonly, willfully, maliciously and/or with extreme conscious

3 disregard.

4 87. In addition to or in alternative to professional negligence, Dr. Norozian’s conduct

5 was despicable and so contemptable that it would be looked down upon and despised by ordinary

6 decent people and was carried on with willful and conscious disregard for the safety of Briana

7 Bradford.

8 88. In addition to or in alternative to professional negligence, Dr. Norozian’s outrageous

9 and unconscionable conduct warrants an award of exemplary and punitive damages under NRS §

10 42.005 in an amount appropriate to punish and make an example of the Defendant and to deter

11 similar conduct in the future.

12 89. As a result of said acts or omissions of Dr. Norozian and breaches of the standard of

13 care, Briana Bradford died.

14 90. At the time Dr. Norozian administered care to Briana Bradford, he was the actual,

15 apparent, implied or ostensible agent of Defendant Pokroy Medical Group of Nevada, Ltd. d/b/a

16 Pediatrix Medical Group of Nevada and/or ROE IV. Therefore, Defendant Pokroy Medical Group

17 of Nevada, Ltd. d/b/a Pediatrix Medical Group of Nevada and/or ROE IV is responsible for the

18 injuries, pain, suffering and death of Briana Bradford under the theory of respondeat superior, NRS

19 § 41.130 and to the extent applicable NRS § 42.007.

20 91. At the time Dr. Norozian administered care to Briana Bradford, he was the actual,

21 apparent, implied or ostensible agent of Defendant Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLC.

22 Therefore, Defendant Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLC is responsible for the injuries, pain,

23 suffering and death of Briana Bradford under the theory of respondeat superior, NRS § 41.130 and

24 to the extent applicable NRS § 42.007.

25 92. As a direct and proximate cause of the acts of the Defendants, Plaintiffs have

26 sustained damages in an amount to be determined at trial but exceeding $15,000.


27 93. That Plaintiffs have been required to retain an attorney to prosecute their case and

28 Defendants are liable for all attorney’s fees, costs and interest incurred.

14
1 SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

2 (Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress – All Defendants)

3 94. Plaintiffs hereby re-state and re-allege each and every paragraph of the Complaint as

4 if fully restated herein.

5 95. As set forth herein previously in the Complaint, the Defendants negligently caused

6 the death of Briana J. Bradford.

7 96. As a result of the Defendants’ acts and omissions, Plaintiffs Diamond Rose and Brian

8 Bradford personally witnessed the extreme pain and suffering, medical emergency care, the last

9 sounds of their child, the last breath of their child, and the death of their child.

10 97. As a result, Plaintiffs were subjected to extreme emotional shock, trauma and distress

11 due to the Defendants’ negligence.

12 98. As a direct and proximate cause of the acts of the Defendants, Plaintiffs have

13 sustained damages in an amount to be determined at trial but exceeding $15,000.

14 99. That Plaintiffs have been required to retain an attorney to prosecute their case and

15 Defendants are liable for all attorney’s fees, costs and interest incurred.

16 EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION

17 (Breach of Contract – All Defendants)

18 100. Plaintiffs hereby re-state and re-allege each and every paragraph of the Complaint as

19 if fully restated herein.

20 101. The Defendants, and each of them, entered into a contract under which they were to

21 provide medical care to Briana Bradford.

22 102. The contract included a covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and an express or

23 implied agreement that medical services would be provided at a professional level within the

24 standard of care.

25 103. Defendants breached their duty under said contract.

26 104. As a direct and proximate cause of the acts of the Defendants, Plaintiffs have
27 sustained damages in an amount to be determined at trial but exceeding $15,000 and are entitled to

28 recover the reasonable amount of medical services incurred for Briana prior to and after her death.

15
1 105. That Plaintiffs have been required to retain an attorney to prosecute their case and

2 Defendants are liable for all attorney’s fees, costs and interest incurred.

3 WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for judgment against the Defendants and each of them

4 jointly and severally as follows:

5 1. For special and general damages in an amount to exceed $15,000;

6 2. For punitive damages in an amount to exceed $15,000;

7 3. For attorney’s fees, expenses, and costs of suit;

8 4. For all pre-judgment and post-judgment interest awardable by law;

9 5. For such further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.

10 DATED this 17th day of February, 2020.

11 BREEDEN & ASSOCIATES, PLLC

12

13 ADAM J. BREEDEN, ESQ.


Nevada Bar No. 008768
14 376 E. Warm Springs Road, Suite 120
Las Vegas, Nevada 89119
15 Phone: (702) 819-7770
Fax: (702 819-7771
16 Adam@Breedenandassociates.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26
27

28

16

Potrebbero piacerti anche