Sei sulla pagina 1di 8

Forensic Psychology

Marilyn McMahon (16.3.1999)


Issues in Forensic Medicine

Select Bibliography

General:
Canter, D. and Alison, L.J. (1997). Criminal Detection and the Psychology of
Crime. Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth.
Melton, G.B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N.G. and Slobogin, C. (1987). Psychological
Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals
and Lawyers. New York: Guilford Press.

Interviewing of VictimslWitnesses:
Cognitive Interview: ,. , . . ': . i :
- Fisher, R. P. and' GJlsel:m~h, ~R."E.I (1992).' Memory Enhancement
Techniques for'lnvestigative-lntefv~ewing. ,Springfield,lL: ,Charles Thomas.
Children: .. ,.
'
" ..
,' ;, \ ' ;', ;

Spencer, J.R. and Flin, R. (1993). The Evidence of Children: The Law and
Psychology. London:Blackstone Press (2nd edition).

, ,I I
Confessions: .
Gudjonsson, G. (1992). The Psychology of Interrogations, Confessions and
, :~i ;festimony. London: Wiley..
ro::'
,

" , , , "

'"

Criminal Profiling: ".

Blau, T. (1994); Criminal' profiling. In BlaLi


Douglas, J. and Olshaker, M. (1996). Mindhunter. London: Mandarin
Douglas, J. and alshaker, M. (1997). Journey into Darkness. London:
:' " Heinemann. '
Dou£il,a~,';J.E.,
Ressler, RK., Burgess, AW. and Hartman, C.R. (1986). Criminal
!..1profiling fro'm crime scene analysis. Behavioral SCiences and the Law, 4,
IJ:;~O1-42f :: ' ' , ' ,

Koc~J!:(R, Irwin, H, and Hayes, A (1998). Organised and disorganised criminal


, ':;/behaviour syndromes in arsonists:"A validation study of a psychological
!"profiling concept.' Psychiatry, Psychology and Law,S, (1), 117-132.
McCann, J.T. (1992). Criminal personality profiling in the investigation of violent
crime: Recent advances and future directions. Behavioral Sciences and
, 11 :f'r'the Law, 10,475-481.
.11 :CI!:""
" 0"
Pinizotto, AJ. and Finkel, N. J. (1990). Criminal personality profiling: An
outcome and process study. Lawand Human Behavior, 14, (3), 215-233.
Turco, RN. (19). Psychological profiling. International Journal of Offender
Therapy and Comparative Criminology,' ,

Wilson, P., Lincoln, R and Kocsis, R (1997). Validity, utility and ethics of
profiling for serial violent and sexual offenders. Psychiatry, Psychology
and Law, 4, (1),1-12.

Battered Woman Syndrome:


American Psychiatric Association. (1994). The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders - Fourth Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric
Association.
American Psychiatric Association. (1987). The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders- Third Edition (Revised). Washington, DC: American
Psychiatric Association.
Anson, 0., and Sagy, S. (1995). Marital violence: Comparing women in violent
and nonviolent unions. Human Relations, 48,(3),285-305
Ball, P and Wyman, E. (1977-78). Battered wives and powerlessness: What can
counsellors do? Victimology,'2,545-552.
" ' '

Blowers, A., and Bjerregaard,' B. (1996). The admissibility of expert testimony on


, I the battered woman syndrome i,nhomicide cases. Journal of Psychiatry and
, Law,,22, (4), 527-560. ,,' , , ' , '
Bricl<er, D. (1993).'Fatal defense: An analysis of battered woman's syndrome
expert! testimony for g'ay; men:and lesbians, who' killiabusive:pahners.
Brooklyn f.aw Review, 58, 1379-1437.
Brodie, J. (1996). 'All youse three will be dead in the morning': The Kontinnen
case. In Greenwood, K. (Ed.). The Thing She Loves: Why Women Kill. St.
, " Lebnards, NSW: Alien and Unwin.
Brown, H. (1997r Unpublished M.A thesis, Monash University.
Bro~nej A~(1988). WhenBattered Women Kill. NY: Free Press.
Buhde v State, 627 P.2d 1374 (Wyoming 1981).
Coffee,C.L. (1986). Note: A trend emerges: A state survey on the admissibility
of expert testimony concerning the battered woman syndrome. Journal of
Family Law, 25, 373~396.
Comack,'E.(1987):Women
, '" .and the 'battered wife syndrome': A plea
defendants
" , ' ,', '

fb'rthesociological imagination. Crown Counsets Review, 5, (12),6-16.


Cr6c~'er',pi.(1985)!The meaning of ~q~alityfor batteredWomenwho kill men in
self;'defense.:Harvaid Women'sLawJourna/, 8, 121-153.
Coughlin, 'A (1994). Excusihg'wome-n, California Law Review, 82, 1- 89,.
Dershowitz, A (1994). The Abuse Excuse: And Other Cop-Outs, Sob Stories,
, and Evasic?ns:ofResponsibility. NY: Little Brown & Co.
Dobash,RE. andDobash, H.P. (1992). Women, Violence and Social Change.
NY:' Routledge:' , '
Dodge,' M.and Greene, 'E. (1991). Juror and expert conceptions of battered
, , ) wbm;en. Violence and Victims, 6;:(4),271-282: I' I I' ':; 'lh: :-;'\ ',j~i I"
Douglas, M.' (1987). The{ baftered I WOmEInsyndrome. Iri'Sc:mkin, Dj, (EdJ)
. :: r' ,,'..\1 !: '",' """ ,,:, "r-"

,r r'
'1 ,

-
Domestic Violence On Trial. NY: Springer.
Duncan, KL (1996). Lies, damned lies and statistics? Psychological syndrome
evidence in the courtroom after Daubert. Indiana Law Journal, 7, (3).
Dutton, M.A. and Goodman, LA. (1994). Posttraumatic stress disorder among
battered women: Analysis of legal implications. Behavioral Sciences and the
Law, 12,215-234.
Dutton, D., and Painter, S.(1993).The battered woman syndrome: Effects of
severity and intermittency of abuse. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,
63, (4) 614-622. '

Easteal, P. (1996). Till death us do part. . In Greenwood, K (Ed.).The Thing She


Loves: Why Women Kill. St. Leonards, NSW: Alien and Unwin.
,

Easteal, P., Hughes, K. and Easter, J. (1993). Battered women and duress.
Alternative Law Journal, 18, (3), 139-140.
Ewing, C. (1987). Battered women who kill: Psychological self defense as legal
justification. Lexington, MA: eath.
", Ewing, C. And Aubry, M. (1987). Battered women and public opinion: Some
realities about the myths. Journal of Family Violence, 2, (3),257-264.
Faigman, C. (1986). The battered woman syndrome and self-defense: A legal
and empirical dissent. Virginia Law Review, 72, 619-647.
Faigmari, C. (1995): The'labyrintn of scientific evidence. Hastings Law Journal,
,"46:", ' ' '," '", ,
, ,

Faigmah, C.and Wright, A. (1997). The battered woman syndrome in the age of
"ts'tience.ArizonaLawReview,39,67-115. ' ' "" ':;

Freckelton, 1."-(1992).Batter'ed woman syndrome. Alternative LavI/Journal, 17,


39141!'" "," ,":,

Freckelton, 1 (1997)." JudiCIal pe'dagogy and expert evidence' on victims'


responses to trauma:.PsycHiatry;,Psychology and Law, 4, (1); '79-86.' ,

Freckeltoii,~I.'(1994). When plight makes right - the Forensic ':1b~~esyndrome.


; ,Criminal Law Journal,'18, (1),29-49. ' :" ,
Freckelton, I. (1993). Novei'psychological evidence. In Freckelton, I. And Selby,
, "H. (Eds). Expert Evidence. Sydney: Law Book Company." " '" '
Gesilioj J.~Smith, H.; and Keckich,;W. (1982). The battered woman grows old.
" : Clinica(Gerontologist, 1, '59-67. ' " ", 0-
Gleascin,W.J. (1993).Mental'disorders in battered women: An empirical study.
, ;i Viola'nce and Victims, 8;' (1), 53-68' . ',' ,

Goodni~m-Delahunty, J. (1997). Forensic psychological expertise in the wake of


, i Daubert.Lawand Human Behavior, 21, (2), 121-14d. " 11 , :~" ,( /, , ,::
Gree'nwobd, ,K. (Ed:). The Thing She'! Loves: Why Women Kill. St. Leonards,
: ' i NSW: Alien and Unwin:, :':, ' ,,'

Hancock, L (1997). Aboriginality and lawyering: Problems for aboriginal


;, defendants:in
, partner homiCide;<::ases. In Cook, S. and'Bessant J: (eds.);
.Women's, Encounters' with Violence. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.
Hawt~ori1e v State (1982). 408 So.2d 801" ' ,
Hilb~rrTlan, E. and Munson,K. (1977-78).Sixty batteredwomen. Victimology,2,
'::460-470. ';' "!'" ',' ,: ,',.,,::,'

Hinchcliffe', , S. and Lloyd, D. (1996). Provocative behaviour: Should battered


, 'vyomen who kill be given speCial ,treatment in law? '
,
,':
': "
.' ", ," . ,- "

I. , I' : ',' ':


", . '-,
http:/www.informinc.co.uklLM/LM86/LM86_Taboos.html
Ho, R and Venus, M. (1995). Reactions to a battered woman who kills her
abusive spouse: An attributional analysis. Australian Journal of Psychology,
47, (3), 153-159.
J v The Queen (1994) 75 A Crim R 522-540.
Jacobson, N., Gottman, J.M., Gortner, E, Berns, S. And Shortt, J. (1996).
Psychological factors in the longitudinal course of battering: When do
couples split up? When does the abuse decrease? Violence and Victims, 11,
371-392.
Kissane, K. (1998, September 5). Kiss or kill? The Age ( Saturday Extra), 1,6.
Kuhl, A. (1984). Personality traits of abused women: Masochism myth refuted.
Victimology, 9, 450-463.
Kuhl, A. (1986). Implications of justifiable homicide verdicts for battered women.
Response, 9,6-10.
Levit, H. (1985). The battered woman. American Journal of Forensic Psychology,
" 3, 9-14.
Levit, H.(1991 ).Battered women: Syndrome versus self-defense. American
Journal of Forensic Psychology; 9, (1) 29-35. :

Maguigan, H. (1991 ). Battered women and self-defense: Myths and


: ( misconceptidns in current ,'reform;proposals.UniversIty of PennsylvaniaLaw
Revie"v,'140',379: i':--;::: r, ;': : ,i'" ;', I;': :

Morse, is. (1990). The misbegotten marriage of soft psychology and bad law.
Law and Human Behavior, 14, (6), 593-618,
Murphy, ,S., (1992r Assisting the jury, in understanding victimisation: Expert
" psychological testimony'on battered woman syndrome and rape trauma
syndrome. Columbia Journal of taw and Social Problems,' 25 276-3,10. '
NicolsOh, D.and Sanghvi, R'(1993).: Battered women' andprovocatibh:The
iMplications of R v Ahluwalia. Crim.L.R. 728-738.
O'Dcinovan,K. (1991). Defences for battered women who kill. Journal of Law
: I and Society, 18, (2), 219-240.' , !:', ' :':' .!

O'D6novan, K. (1993).' Law's knowledge: The judge, the expert, the battered
': I woman and her syndrome. Journal of Law and Society, 20', (4),427-437.

R v Bradley (1994). Unreported judgement of the Supre~e Court of Victoria,


"14.12.1994. " ' ,

R v C (1993) 60 SASR467-480.
R v Gilbert (1993). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of Western
AiJstralia,'4:11.1993."" "

Rv. 'Hickey (1992). ~Unreportedjudgement of the Supreme Court of New South


Wales; 14.4.1992.'! ':,' "':' ,'d:, ;,

R, v McEwen(1996). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of Western


'::Australia,18-25.4.1995,18.3.1996.': ",'",

R v Runjanjic and Kontinnen'(1991) 56 SASR 114; 53 A Crim R 362.


R \i Kontinnen (1992). Unreportedjudgement of the SUpremeCourt of South
Australia, 26.3.1992, 30.3.1992.' , ,
R v Taylcr (1994), Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court' of South
': ': Australia,'3.2. 1994.' !,O,' ,; ',I "" :
, 'r' .'. ",

R v Woolsey(1'993): Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of New South


':'",...::::~:<,;~,~)':::"'" !i,: ' :' ',;'
woman and her syndrome. Journal of Law and Society, 20, (4),427-437,
R v Bradley (1994). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of Victoria,
14.12.1994.
Rv C (1993) 60 SASR 467-480.
R v Gilbert (1993). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of Western
Australia, 4.11. 1993.
Rv. Hickey (1992). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of New South
Wales, 14.4.1992.
R v McEwen (1996). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of Western
Australia, 18-25.4.1995, 18.3.1996.
Rv Runjanjic and Kontinnen (1991) 56 SASR 114; 53 A Crim R 362.
R v Kontinnen (1992). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of South
. Australia, 26.3.1992, 30.3.1992.
R v Taylor (1994). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of South
Australia, 3.2, 1994.
" R v Woolsey(1993). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of New South
Wales, 19.8.1993,
Reddy, P., Knowles, A, Mulvaney, J" McMahon, M. And Freckelton, I. (1997):
Attributions about domestic violence: A study of community attitudes,
Psychiatry; Psychology'and'raw; 4,(2), 125-146." :' i". .
Rittenmayer, S. (1981r Of battered wives, self-defe'nse and double standards
of justice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 9, (5), 389-396.
Rog~r~; N: :(1996). To save her life: Gender, justice and battered women who <~
"kill.. In Gre'enwood, K. (Ed.): The'Thing She Loves: Why Women Kill. St.
,

Leonards, NSW: Alien and Unwin.


Rosewater, L.(1987). The clinical and courtroom application of battered
women's personality assessments. In Sonkin, D,J. (Ed). Domestic Violence
..,'.onTrial.'NY:"Springer..':; 'J'r'~:,. ','; d:'i,;",,' ;'1.'
SchoPP, RF., Sturgls, B.J:, arid Sullivan, M. (1994). Battered woman syndrome,
expert testimony, 'and the distinction between justification and excuse.
,

University of Illinois Law Review, 1994,45-113.


, ; .' ,

Schuller, R (1992).The impact of battered woman syndrome evidence on jury


decision processes: Lawand,Hiima/fBehavibr,
, .', 16,(6),597-620
Schuller, R", and Hastings,P. (1996). Trials of batteredwomen who kill: The
. impact of fiiternative forms of expert evidence. Law and Human Behavior,
20, (2) 167-187.' .

Schuller,. R, Smith, V" and Olson, J. (1994).Jurors' decisions in trials of battered


women who kill: The role of prior beliefs and expert testimony, Joilfnalof
. Applied Social Psychology, 24; (4) 316-337 ..
Schuller, R and Vidmar, N.' (1992).. Battered woman syndrome evidence in the
. courtroom:A review of the literature. Law and Human Behaviour,16, 273-
:' .291. . ' . '

Sheehy, E., Stubbs, J.'And Tolmie','J: (1992). Defending battered women on


trial: The battered' woman 'syndrome and its limitations. Criminal Law
':I.~J6Urna/,16,I,369. 'j ~:",,:;.:\; ",.,1;0::';. '

Simdhe'" O!'(,t997). ,"'Killerniahwasla' battered 'wife': The'application of b'attered


. worhar\'s'yndrometO homosexual defendants, The Queen v McEwen.
. ( !, " i':i r", ' ' ';.; . .~, l, :, ~: I" I.
54

Sydney Law Review, 19,230-239.


Spiers, M. (1998). Which chicks are the liars? An undemocratic universe -
i chaos, lies, representation and the law.
Http:/lwww.iq.com.aul-dtebbuttlojlojchaosll.htm
State v Green (1990). No, 90-0039, Florida District Court of Appeal.
State v Kelly (1984).97 NJ 178,478 A 2d 364,
State v Thomas (1981). 66 Ohio St.2d 518, 423 NE 2d 137.
The Queen v Kina (1993). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of
j Queensland, 29.11.1993.
The Queen v Lorenz (1998). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of
NSW 14 August 1998.
Thyfault, R, Bennet, C., and Hirschorn, R (1987). Battered women in court: Jury
and trial consultants and expert witnesses. In Sonkin, D. (Ed.), Domestic
Violence on Trial. N.Y.: Springer.
, Walus-Wigle, J and Meloy, J. (1988). Battered woman syndrome as a criminal
" defence. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 16,(3),389-404.
Walker, L (1977-78). Battered women and learned helplessness. Victimology,
2.
Walker, LE. (1984a), Battered women, psychology and public policy. American
Psychologist,. 39, 1178':1f82i' '~;'S
Wc'iIKer,11:(1992). Battered wbmafri'syndrome and'self-defense!'Notre"Dame
Journal of Lawj<EthicsandPublit Policy, 6,321-334. ': " .',','

Walker,'L.' (1991r PosHraumatic stress disorder in women: Diagnosis and


,f treatrrientofbattered woman syndrome. Special Issue: Psychotherapy with
,1 victims. ~ Psychotherapy; 28, (1) 21-29
Walker, ~. (1989). Psychology and violent women. American Psychologist, 44,
1':(4),695-702. , ""'" ' " '

Walker,
I" L (1989). Terrifying Love, New York: Harper Perennial.
" ",
Walker, L (1984b). The Battered Woman Syndrome. New York: Springer.
Walker, L (1995). Understanding battered woman syndrome. Trial, 31, (2), 30,
Walker! L (1983), Victimology and the psychological perspectives of battered
women.:Victimology,8,82-104: i ,;': ", ',: '

Walker, L (1983).'Who are 'the battered women?


Walker, L, Thyfault, R, and Browne,'A (1982). Beyond the juror's ken: Battered
Wo'men.Vermont Law Review, 7, 1-14. '
Winnett v Stephenson (ACT Magistrates Court, unreported, 19 May 1993).
Yeo/S, (1992).Hickey: A case note. Criminal Law Journal.
Zde~,~owski,G, (1992~October 6).' Killing to survive. The Bulletin, 18, '
,I
~! "

" 'I , " I


i , ;,
'J
, ;
,\, 'r ':' '" "I ; :,', "
, t:
'i'1
~ 'I
THE HOLMES TYPOLOGY (PART I)

This typology is based on obsessive-compulsive charactedstics of the serial killer as indicated from
verbal interview data on the reasons they kill. It contains an implicit theory of interpersonal
(socio-emotional) development, based upon their position in a cycle of violence (similar to the cycle
of victimization for any self-defeating or addictive pattern).

The labels "disorganized" and "organized" refer to the degree of pe."sonality aberration, which is
evident in how chaotic or controlled the crime scene is. The labels "asocial" and "nonsocial" refe."
to whether the pe."son is a loner because of weirdness or by choice.

I SO
~
GAN s

{ rIr~!!~~ ~~~
I
o
: : ': :g
"l~:~ :~~!! ~ 1 ~ r~! f~~ ~ ~~1"OR: E~~ m ~ ~ ~ ~Q'= ' ~~ ':~' ~I ~ f
l
1,",",oo"""",--,,,!~,!~,~,,~.!~.~.~!,~.~~--~.!~.r,,~.~.~,~..~.~,!.~.~~~",--,oo",w".,...jL,.""w"",I,~~,~~,,~.i,~~,.P.,~,~~~.~~
. . . . . . . .. . 0." dates frequently .
:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
:!

I C,',:'.,.,:.",...,'.. :.::',:'::~_~i~~!'~'~',:~~~~~:~,~:~}~.!~~,~,::.:., ::.. '.~,',':'~'.,:','.,',','..~]!" .,.'::',0.':--:0,."0.:".',",'."" ~.~~,~~,~..!~~

(r"""""""i~.;ii;;.;~'~ti'~~~l';'b.~;'~~'i~~~~~'i~'t~~t"".""""'.'1 f"."""'..""""""'.i~;i'iy..ph.y~i.~';
;

:,,,
E::~~~~~~~~~~l~~:::::-J
[::~~~~~~~t~~~~~~
usually a high school dropout' .. [:::I , may be college educated :1
"::'::::::::::::::::::';::'::'::;

I
'::;'::""'::::::::"::'::'~::"::::,::::,::::~.,.::,;::::.::,::,::;.::
.. ::.:;:::;::::::.::,::.::::::,,: f:::':';:::""":'::::""":'::';:::::'::'::::::::::::":::::':':::.:;:.:,::::.;.:::.::':::'::;"::::.;:::.:.::::,::::,:,~,::::::::,','",::,.,: [
. .
:. poorhygi~ne/housekeeping skills" ;1, good hygiene/housekeeping skills [
Ir
;f;.;£;:.;.:~~~~;£. E~
~l;i ~.ii;~; ~I;~:! E;:E~; ~ .::~.:~
:.:;.::.:JC: ~:;;:;;;~:;;.:~.; .;;;;;.~.~;~; ;.;~;E i:~f~:~p;;.;':E ~ i; ~:~I ;.; ~~::.';;.::'.~"
.:.::'J
l
~~~:; :';~; I

;
. nocturnal (nighttime) habits ;r diumal (daytime) habits :;

I C, ",' ",:"", oo,~.~,:,i';~;','~','.~~ ~'~.~;",~~,~',',;, ~'~~ ~~~'~"'~'~';~'H """', '"," "[r"', '~~","~~"~~--'::'~'~~'~~;~'" ;',~~'~,~ ;', '~'~"~~""H'" "~:~'~'" '~~~=~"I

i
iI
. memories
needs to return to have done
crim~ scene for relivi~g -'I : need;-;~';~;;;;~'t;;~rime scene to see ';h~;'p~i;~~il :~
! ,00H"~~;"~'~'~~~~~'~'i~~i~';'~'i~'~'il;"~~';i~;' ~~~'~~'."'.' 'j ,"'" """""~~~'~'il;c~~~'~~~ ~'~~";~Ii'~~' '~'~"~I~;"~~~~~" "H' ,..'"., .': I

attacks in a "blitz"
:'I1':::=;:.::;:.:===:--:==;:.:==:: pattern
=;=::=;:.:=::::::::;:.:;:::::::::: i!'-.~tt;-;;k;'~;i'~g-~eduction into re;t;~~.t~--'---'--11
::::::::=::::::::::::::::c:::=:::::::==:=:::=:::::=::=::=::::::=::::::::=::;::::::;
ir
. depersonalizes victim to a thing or it . 1 r keeps pe."sonal, holds a conversation :~

IE~:~~~~~~~~~===j f::=-:=::~f~~1~~~~~~~~~~~~,":=: I

!I respondsbestto counselingil1tervie;
,.;::::.:::::::.:::::.:::.::::.::.:::=::::::c::::===::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::..:::::::::::::::::::::::::."...::::::::::::::::;::::::::::::;
T---oo~:;~'p-~~d';-b~.;t t~ di.:;~t intervi;~:::::::::~::::::=:H
co:;::;;::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::=::.::::.:::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::;J

Adapted and modified f."omR. Holmes (1996) Profilin2 Violent Crimes. Sage Publications"

'-
'"

.'

I. Profiling inputs 2. Decision-Process 3. Crime Assessment


Models
Crime Scene Reconstruction of Crime
Physical Evidence Homicide Type & Style Crime Classification
Pattern of Evidence Primary Intent Organized/Disorganized
Body Positions Victim Risk Victim Selection
~ ~
Weapons Offender Risk Control of Victim
Escalation Sequence of Crime
Victimology Time for Crime Staging
Background Location Factors Motivation
Habits Crime Scene Dynamics
FamilyStructure
Last Seen
Age
Occupation r 1
Forensic Information Feedback No. I 4. Criminal Profile
Cause of Death
Wounds Validation of Profile Demographics
Pre/Post Mortem with CrimeiDeath Scene Physical Characteristics
Sexual Acts with Evidence ~ Habits
Autopsy Report with Decision Models Preoffense Behavior
Laboratory Reports with Investigation Leading to Crime
Recommendations Postoffense Behavior
Preliminary Police Report Recommendations
Background Information to Investigation
Police Observation
Time of Crime r
Who Reported Crime
Neighborhood Feedback No. :2 1
Socioeconomic Status ~
New Evidenc~
Crime Rate 15. Investigation I

Photos
Aerial 1
Crime Scene
Victim
I 6.. Apprehension I

Figure 1. Criminal profile generating process.

p ~ ...0~S R t-.----------
) S6'~ I g II,~~. -~-- "'0 ~~. J" ~t. .. ....----...

Potrebbero piacerti anche