20210123-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Donald J Trump Jr-Presidential Legality, Brendan Hunt, Etc

Donald Trump Jr (Australia) 23-1-2021
Cc: FBI @FBI

Brendan Hunt's attorney, Leticia Olivera @Letigiova
AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN.
20210123-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Donald J Trump Jr- Presidential legality, Brendan Hunt, etc
Donald,
I refer back to my previous correspondences I provided you copies of also.
My writings must not be seen as to intending in any way to justify what has eventuated in the
USA regarding any form of violence. I merely raise issues as I did when assisting/representing a
party in legal proceedings.
Since I forwarded my previous 21-1-2021 writing I have watched some videos and refer to those
also.
Firstly, I understood that Senator Linsey Graham with Mario (FoxNews) claimed the election is
over and to accept the end result. I do not know where he was but it seems to me appalling that
he doesn’t seem to understand the election process. In Australia it is totally irrelevant if a person
is sworn in who afterwards was found ineligible to be sworn in and so the seat is declared vacant.
Yes, the USA Constitution requires to have a president sworn in but if afterwards it is held that
the person sworn in had no legal standing then the swearing in simply never eventuated.
In an election where there was so to say a 2 horse race being your father President Donald J
Trump and Joe Biden and he is disqualified then it means your father in fact is re-elected.
.
With the majority of either Houses of Congress where the California ballots were invalid then
clearly not a single Member of Congress from California was re-elected in November 2020. This
means that neither house has any kind of Democratic majority.
It is very important that this California issue, I referred to in my previous writings is properly
explored. After all also others who on a State level purportedly were elected never were, etc.
.
I understand that in accordance with court orders AZ is now going to provide all communication
and other material and this may prove that there was unlawful conduct involved in the election.
Adding this to the 55 non-eligible California Electoral College slate then this also provide a
different outcome. And if other disputed state Electoral college slates were to be likewise coming
to different results then the future is bright. I for one have not given up that in the end your father
still can be held by the courts to have been the lawful re-elected president.
I also watched a show where Alan (who represented your father in the first impeachment) made
clear that you cannot separately change what impeachments are about. I wrote to you about that
previously also.
p1 23-1-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
The question then is if in the end your father was deemed to be the actual successful November
2020 candidate then with the impeachment 2.0 would this then become a problem.
I do not consider to be so this as I have already alluded that in my view Nancy Pelosi was not
lawfully re-elected and had therefore no legal standing either to become re-elected Speaker.
https://www.westernjournal.com/nancy-pelosi-floats-prosecution-republican-
lawmakers/?ff_source=Email&ff_medium=WJBreaking&ff_campaign=breaking&ff_content=western-journal
Nancy Pelosi Floats 'Prosecution' of Republican Lawmakers
QUOTE
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi indicated Friday that Republican members of Congress who can be judged to
have helped anyone involved in the Capitol incursion could face punishment.
END QUOTE
Nancy Pelosi Floats 'Prosecution' of Republican Lawmakers

QUOTE
Olsen argued that “voting to sustain the objection is not an endorsement of the riot or a violent overthrow of
the U.S. government.”
“One can (wrongly) believe the election was stolen while also believing that democratic remedies are the
only appropriate solution. Neither of those beliefs warrants expulsion or censure.”
He noted that supporting what was expected to be a peaceful protest is hardly illegal.
“Even members who supported the march in word or deed before it devolved into a riot should not face the
consequences. The march may have been distasteful to many, but so long as it was peaceful, it was perfectly
acceptable for Republicans to support it. If doing so weren’t acceptable, then any member who helps to
organize a mass rally that is disliked by a super majority of Congress could be at risk of expulsion or
censure,” he wrote.
“We cannot have a democracy where minorities are subject to sanction when they legally protest against an
existing majority.”
Olsen added that everything changes “if it can be proven that a Republican supported the march with the
intent that it turn violent. In that case, the member would not be acting within the bounds of acceptable
democratic behavior. He or she would have acted with the intent to cause an insurrection.”
“Those who attempt to overthrow the government through insurrection or violence no longer should be
permitted to operate within a democratic body. Their acts, even if they did not come to fruition, would show
they cannot loyally discharge their oaths of office and thus cannot sit in Congress.”
END QUOTE
Where Kamala Harriss is reportedly the President of the Senate than she can be impeached for
having a fund on her website to bail out rioters. Also for her condoning, approving, promoting
and inciting the murderous riots even AFTER the election. As such, her conduct was to sow fear
into lawmakers they better vote (two levels she refers to) as the riots would continue AFTER
the election. Hence, she specifically related to the election and not separated from it.
As I referred to then Senator Kamala Harris had made clear that the murderous riots (reportedly
causing 47 deaths) would continue even AFTER the election. As such, her comments were
clearly related to the election. Michel Knowles of @2PMET also highlighted this.
I have now watched some of your father’s speech about going to the Capitol, and I view there is
absolutely nothing I can detect is to urge any riot, to the contrary your father urges it to be
peaceful.
.
I also came across an article of Congresswoman Maxine Waters:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxine_Waters
Bombing attempt[edit]
Packages that contained pipe bombs were sent to two of Waters's offices on October 24,
2018. The packages were intercepted and were investigated by the FBI. No one was
injured. Similar packages were sent to several other Democratic leaders and to CNN. [61][62]
In 2019, Cesar Sayoc pleaded guilty to mailing the bombs and was sentenced to 20 years in
prison.[63][64]
^ Weiser, Benjamin; Watkins, Ali (August 5, 2019). "Cesar Sayoc, Who Mailed Pipe Bombs to Trump
Critics, Is Sentenced to 20 Years". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 10, 2020.
^ "Florida Man Who Mailed Bombs To Democrats, Media Gets 20 Years In Prison". NPR.org. Retrieved
January 10, 2020.
76. ^ Max Greenwood, Maxine Waters: Trump is the most deplorable person I’ve ever met, The Hill
(August 4, 2017).
77. "Rep. Maxine Waters: Trump advisors with Russia ties are ..." MSNBC. February 21, 2017.
78. Diaz, Daniella (February 6, 2017). "Waters: Trump 'leading himself' to impeachment". CNN.
80. -^ Lim, Naomi (October 12, 2017), "Maxine Waters: Congress has enough evidence against
Trump to 'be moving on impeachment'", Washington Examiner.
81. ^ Carter, Brandon (August 13, 2017), "Maxine Waters to Trump: Blame for Charlottesville is on
your side, not 'many'", The Hill.
82. ^ Waters, Maxine (August 13, 2017). "Trump has made it clear - w/ Bannon & Gorka in the WH,
& the Klan in the streets, it is now the White Supremacists' House. #Charlottesviille".
@RepMaxineWaters. Retrieved October 27, 2019.
83. ^ Koman, Tess (February 1, 2018). "Maxine Waters Delivers Scathing SOTU Response: 'Make No
Mistake. Trump Is a Dangerous Racist'". Cosmopolitan. Retrieved February 6, 2018.
84. ^ Ruiz, Joe (March 11, 2018). "Trump again questions Rep. Waters' intelligence, says she's 'very
low IQ'". CNN. Retrieved March 11, 2018.
85. ^ "Congresswoman Maxine Waters' Advice for President Trump: 'Please Resign'". Time.
86. ^ Ehrlich, Jamie (June 25, 2018). "Democratic congresswoman encourages supporters to harass
Trump administration officials". CNN. Retrieved June 25, 2018.
87. ^ Pramuk, Jacob (June 25, 2018). "Pelosi rebukes Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters for urging
supporters to confront Trump administration officials". CNBC. Retrieved June 25, 2018.
88, ^ Panetta, Grace. "WHIP COUNT: Here's which members of the House voted for and against
impeaching Trump". Business Insider.
89. ^ Folley, Aris (January 13, 2021). "Maxine Waters in impeachment speech says Trump 'capable
of starting a civil war'". TheHill. Retrieved January 13, 2021.
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/06/25/politics/maxine-waters-trump-officials/index.html
QUOTE
Washington (CNN)Rep. Maxine Waters called on her supporters to publicly confront and harass members of
the Trump administration in response to the "zero tolerance" policy that led to the separation of families at the
border.
The California Democrat and vehement critic of President Donald Trump made the comments on Saturday,
first at a rally in Los Angeles and later in a television interview. The comments, which come after several
Trump administration officials have been recently protested at restaurants, have raised fresh questions about
the state of American political discourse and were seized on by Trump for political gain.
"Let's make sure we show up wherever we have to show up. And if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a
restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push
back on them. And you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere. We've got to get the children
connected to their parents," Waters said at the Wilshire Federal Building, according to video of the event.
END QUOTE
In my view, “harassment” is a criminal offense and to seek others to do so means this is 2

persons or more which then is deemed a conspiracy and this is a felony issue.

Innocent persons who happen to work for a living are to be harassed (and so if they have friends
and/or family at a restaurant merely because they are officials of the Government. That to me is
ultimate betrayal of being a Member of Congress who made an oath to uphold the constitution.
It is this kind of conduct that escalate the tempers in the community. They have witnessed all
kinds of wrongdoing against their President and his government employees (many are Democrats
also) and yet somehow nothing was done by the law enforcement authorities to hold Maxine
Waters legally accountable. Neither was she expelled from the House for inciting hatred, and
promoting a form of criminal conduct against Members of the Administration.
I also noticed from a video by Judge Janine (Fox News) that she exposed that a note dated 5
January refers to civil war, relating to the “lockdowns”. This clearly underline what I previously
stated that already in August it was made clear that the lockdowns caused harm and could result
in “CIVIL WAR”.
https://lawandcrime.com/crazy/texas-professor-filipe-castro-fired-saying-hang-trump-biden-entrails-and-play-
soccer-with-jeff-sessions-head/
Texas A&M Professor Fired After Saying He Would ‘Hang Trump By...
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/10/29/whitmer-kidnapping-plot-man-charged-threatened-trump-
obama-online/6067348002/
Fact check: Trump campaign falsely suggests Rep. Jim Clyburn ...
20 Dec 2019 ... Facts First: Clyburn did use the words “hang him,” but this was not a call to
hang Trump or anyone else. Rather, Clyburn was saying that Senate ...
END QUOTE
Clyburn said that, if it were up to him, it is possible Democrats would never transmit the articles of
impeachment. He said McConnell's previous comments about coordinating with White House lawyers on the
trial have made clear that McConnell is not impartial.
"If he doesn't come around to committing to a fair trial, keep those articles here. So -- keep it as long as it
takes," Clyburn said. "If you know, and he's told you, what he's gonna do, he's just -- almost like, 'Let's give
him a fair trial and hang him.' I mean, it's the reverse of that."
Clyburn could perhaps have made his point more clearly, but it was abundantly clear that he was not calling
for Trump's execution.
END QUOTE
In my view to state “'Let's give him a fair trial and hang him.'” Means precisely that to “hang”
a person after the trial. This is not “fact check” but rather to seek to yet again alter the meaning
of what a person stated to try to make some absurd excuse. One doesn’t talk about “hang” as if
one is going to refer to hanging a picture when one mention this in regard of a trial.
Fact check: Trump campaign falsely suggests Rep. Jim Clyburn ...
QUOTE
Brent Bozell, president of the conservative Media Research Center, tweeted to 103,000 followers, "CNN sees
nothing wrong with calling for President Trump to be lynched. Imagine how they'd react if Trump called for
Clyburn to be lynched." Todd Starnes, the conservative commentator and former Fox News radio
host, tweeted to 113,000 followers, "WATCH: Rep. James Clyburn Wants to Execute President Trump."
He added, "Hey @SecretService - are you aware of this threat against the president?"
END QUOTE
And then we have:

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/politics/new-yorker-called-for-public-execution-of-pelosi-aoc-and-schumer-
prosecutors/ar-BB1cVC2R?ocid=msedgdhp
New Yorker Called for 'Public Execution' of Pelosi, AOC and Schumer—Prosecutors

A New York man has been charged after allegedly calling for the "public execution" of
lawmakers, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
QUOTE
Brendan Hunt, 37, was arrested in the Queens borough of New York City on Tuesday and charged with
threatening to murder U.S. officials, the Department of Justice said.
According to the complaint, Hunt—who uses the alias "X-Ray Ultra" online—posted an 88-second video
titled "KILL YOUR SENATORS" on video-sharing platform BitChute two days after the deadly January 6
riot at the Capitol.
In the clip, he allegedly urged people to travel to Washington, D.C. to kill members of Congress on
Inauguration Day.
"We need to go back to the U.S. Capitol when all of the Senators and a lot of the Representatives are back
there, and this time we have to show up with our guns. And we need to slaughter these m*********ers," he
said, according to the complaint.
"If anybody has a gun, give me it, I'll go there myself and shoot them and kill them."
The FBI affidavit said Hunt has posted a series of statements calling for violence against lawmakers since at
least December 6 last year, including one that called for the "public execution" of Democratic lawmakers.
"Trump, we want actual revenge on democrats. meaning, we you to hold a public execution of pelosi aoc
schumer etc. And if you don't do it, the citizenry will," he wrote in a Facebook post last month.
"Start up the firing squads, mow down these commies, and lets take america back!"
Acting United States Attorney Seth DuCharme said Hunt would be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
"Our democracy depends on the legislators who shoulder the responsibility of government. By allegedly
threatening to murder and intimidate elected officials, Hunt is striking at the core of our government,"
DuCharme said.
FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge William Sweeney added: "Before the assault on the Capitol building, and
again after, Hunt's alleged online commentary directly called for the assassination of members of Congress.
This is not a hard message to understand—threats of violence against our public officials won't be tolerated."
END QUOTE
Actually, it was this article that I read on (Australia) 22-1-2021 that triggered my memory about
Maxine Waters that I recall incited others. And, also many other Democrat Members of Congress
doing similarly.
.
As I for 37 conducted a special lifeline service (Until 2019) under the motto MAY JUSTICE
ALWAYS PREVAIL® it was people like Brendan Hunt I was at times dealing with who
wanted to blow up court houses (with everyone I it) and other destruction to cause maximum loss
of life. They simply view (rightly or wrongly) that they perceive it have been subjected to
ongoing injustices and see no alternative but to take the law into their own hands.
Many of those persons I was dealing with even decades later would indicate to me they were
glad I was there to listen and guide them to a different path to resolve things. However, when a
person has no such alternative presented and see that their President is vilified as a TRAITOR,
Russian Agent, and a lot more and even the courts fails to step in to address the core issues and
politicians themselves are inciting murderous riots, harassment, etc, then while the very
lawmakers doing this are so to say left without any legal accountability, those acting in response
then can suffer severe consequences, unless the political motivated FBI and other law
enforcement agencies are concealing details and allowing their political aligned criminals to be
let off. Indeed, as Ratcliffe indicated that Intelligence political activist opposing President
Donald J Trump failed to release details that were required. As such, no use to blame some
person as if he/she acted in malice when really the members of congress and the law enforcement
agencies themselves are the real cause of the problems.
When I already understood that in August 2020 a person was declaring it will be “CIVIL WAR”
if the Democrat led State government didn’t provide support for starving family due to the
lockdowns, then clearly it is absurd to blame President Donald J Trump for what was already
announced in August 2020. To the contrary, with then Senator Kamala Harris supporting the
continuation of murderous riots even AFTER the election then she in a sense set the tone that it is
alright to hold murderous riots.

While I understood that Senator Lindsey Graham was telling Mario that it was unacceptable for
anyone to defile the Congress, well let me wake him up so was it for all those persons who had
their lifelong work destroyed where Senator Kamala Harris was condoning, approving,
promoting and inciting to have the murderous riots to continue even AFTER the election.
As such, her inciting of murderous riots was clearly related to the election.
I may not agree with Brendan Hunt proposal, as I am opposed to any violence (including the
death penalty), but let us not ignore how President Saddam Hussein was callously pursued that
he had WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, this even so he didn’t have any, and then ended
up being executed. As such, those Members of Congress who supported this kind of conduct
cannot claim now that somehow they are a better sort.
If you vilify your own house then do not expect others to show respect for your house.
.
When I notice how this sham of a impeachment 2.0 is pursued where clearly the impeachment
must be for removal of a person from a political held position and then as a subsequent action the
person can be barred from every holding a public office but impeachment never can be for the
sole purpose of barring a person to hold a public office as to achieve the latter one needs to
pursue that the person is convicted of a felony charge and then might be barred as a result.
https://www.westernjournal.com/nyt-contributor-deletes-tweet-lynching-pence-
got/?ff_source=Email&ff_medium=conservative-brief-WJ&ff_campaign=dailypm&ff_content=western-journal
NYT Contributor Deletes Tweet About Lynching Pence - But We Got It
QUOTE
New York Times contributing opinion writer Will Wilkinson was trolling Twitter sharing his awful opinions.
One of them was that former Vice President Mike Pence should be lynched.
Wilkinson — who is vice president of research at the Niskanen Center, a supposedly “moderate, nonpartisan”
D.C.-based think tank — started off by prodding conservatives about the unity the left keeps saying is coming
from Democrats led by Biden.
“‘Aha! Biden proposes policies I dislike. HIS CALL FOR UNITY IS A LIE!!!’ is all the forlorn
conservative mind can seem to muster. Sad,” Wilkinson tweeted.
But the horrible, biased, no-good New York Times contributor wasn’t finished. In a second tweet, he called
for the hanging death of Pence.
TRENDING: 'I Will Not Be Silenced': Tara Reade Speaks Out on Biden's Inauguration
“If Biden really wanted unity, he’d lynch Mike Pence,” Wilkinson wrote.
END QUOTE
The democrats had a relentless campaign against President Donald J Trump even starting before
he was sworn in and continued this forever in the day. And now calling for unity because that is
what suits them while at the same time persisting in an unconstitutional impeachment 2.0 and
also having a list against anyone who was supporting or working for the Presidents
administration.
.
Now the banks are also getting involved in the act and others and this is not a call for unity but a
call to unite as a force against anyone associated somehow with President Donald J Trump to
inflict harm as much as possible.
It has been notable that the Democrats have been ongoing vilifying President Donald J Trump
and sowed hatred against a sitting President. To me that was not FREEDOM OF SPEECH as you
can only claim you constitutional protected FREEDOM OF SPEECH if you do not misuse it for
ulterior purposes such as to slander another person. It is not that the constitution provides for
FREEDOM OF SPEECH rather that it protect your rights of FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
Again, I may not agree with what Brendan Hunt seemed to be professing, but I can
UNDERSTAND why a person may feel being driven to this. It are those who pursued their vile
bile for all those years who I view really are responsible and should be held legally accountable,
but that is very unlikely where the FBI is as I view it politically charged.
.
While Senator Lindsey Graham claims that the election is over and done with, again, I do not
agree with this. Not uncommon the actual holding of the election might be over but in the
aftermath months or even years later, those sworn in are declared to have been ineligible and so
the other candidate with the highest number of votes may be deemed to have been the successful
candidate. As such to so to say roll over merely because of wanting to fall in line with others I
view is not what a lawmaker should do.
https://thehill.com/policy/technology/534099-twitter-says-lock-on-gop-congresswomans-
account-was-result-of-incorrect
Twitter says lock on GOP congresswoman's account was result of 'incorrect enforcement
action'
QUOTE
Boebert was recently involved in tensions that flared between Capitol Police and some Republican
lawmakers who argued over the use of metal detectors outside the House chamber following the violent
insurrection. Boebert was seen by a reporter setting off the metal detector and refusing to turn her bag over
for inspection.
Later Boebert tweeted: "I am legally permitted to carry my firearm in Washington, D.C. and within the
Capitol complex." She added that the detectors are "just another political stunt by Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi"
that wouldn't have prevented last week's riots.
END QUOTE
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/89309/united-states-v-cruikshank/?
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876)
This judgment makes it clear that the constitution doesn’t provide the right to have arms rather it
is an inherit right and the constitution does no more but prohibit be Congress to interfere with
this.
I happen to watch a video of CNN, that it promotes (such as former CEO of Facebook) promoted
that Americans should be dealt with as ISIS, and that they have to accept the mantra of the media
and not permitted to have their own views.
This is how dangerous it is. Even wanting to prevent NEWSMAX to be able to have its
television channel because it doesn’t follow the CNN narrative. Perhaps if one was to argue that
CNN should be banned for not following NEWSMAX views then it might claim this is
unconstitutional? Like Twitter claiming human rights because of restrictions it now face in some
countries if it didn’t comply with lawmakers legal provisions. Well, in the meantime the human
rights of others seems to be ignored by Twitter and other Big Tech companies.
As I did set out in my previous correspondence to you that in my view your father is legitimately
re-elected and that the purported swearing in of Joe Biden has absolutely no legal validity.
And that I view the media is overlooking that were your father be reinstated into the presidency
that he rightly was elected for then all those now combining against him may just be taught a
lesson.
I just read the Opinion of David Flint (Emeritus Professor of Law) as published in the December
8-24, 2020 The Epoch Times (Page A6) “The World Demands Courage Not cowardice” and I
fully agree with the statement.
.
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/politics/new-yorker-called-for-public-execution-of-pelosi-aoc-
and-schumer-prosecutors/ar-BB1cVC2R?ocid=msedgdhp
QUOTE

DuCharme said.
END QUOTE
Now let this be clear threats of violence against “public officials” as any person is when
“president” won’t be tolerated unless you are congresswoman Maxine Waters and other
Democratic Members of Congress, such as Senator Kamala Harris, to achieve the highest public
office positions and the judicature will be so to say rolling over to accommodate for this.
If I were so to say in Brendan Hunt position or was to have to had represented him I would issue
summonses for Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, AOC, Adam Schiff and
numerous others to be at the trial and to be examined under oath for their numerous statements to
vilify the most senior public official the President of the USA and all and any incitement, etc
they made.
Their “Trump derangement syndrome” must be exposed to every extent.
In my view a fair minded jury may just conclude that “NULLIFICATION” is appropriate to
defeat any charges against Brendan Hunt because the real instigators were the very Members of
Congress and their allies, MSM (Mainstream media) and Big Tech.
.
Here we had AOC as a Member of Congress pursuing to “list” those who were supporting and/or
working for President Donald J Trump. As such she created a environment that very well may be
deemed to incite unlawful conduct, as a Members of Congress this must never be accepted.
Other than the article above about Brendan Hunt I do not have any other knowledge about him
and as such can only rely upon my personal experiences of the many who contemplated similar
conduct but never went ahead but accepted my guidance to pursue peaceful solutions.
.
Hypothetically, Brendan Hunt might be just a so-called average American who may have even
been unemployed due to the social and economical conditions that existed. Then this Candidate
Trump is for the 206 presidential election and well he offers hope and a better future to bring
back jobs to Americans. Unlike most politicians when elected President Donald J Trump actually
does what he promised and people of all levels in society are reaping the benefits of this
improvement of the economy, etc. The Democrats however having failed to derail candidate
Trump, with the assistance of the political motivated FBI and others then explore ways to destroy
the Presidency of President Donald J Trump. Their inflammatory accusations against the most
senior public servant know no bounds. FREEDOM OF SPEECH is misused and abused to every
extent well what ordinary could be deemed FREEDOM OF SPEECH and the vile bile that comes
from their mouths may only indicate what is inside of them.
A PBS lawyer even was recorded to make clear that Republican supporters would be pursued
and their children “re-educated” so as to deal with them.
Foster (1950) S.R. (N.S.W.) 149, at p151 (Lord Denning, speaking on the role of an advocate)
QUOTE
As an advocate he is a minister of Justice equally with a judge, A Barrister cannot
pick or choose his clients...He must accept the brief and do all he honourably can on
behalf of his client. I say 'All he honourably can' because his duty is not only to his
client. He has a duty to the court which is paramount. It is a mistake to suppose that
he is a mouthpiece of his client to say what he wants: or his tool to do what he
directs. He is none of those things. He owes his allegiance to a higher cause. It is the
cause of truth and Justice. He must not consciously misstate the facts. He must not
knowingly conceal the truth. He must not unjustly make a charge of fraud, that is,
without evidence to support it. He must produce all relevant authorities, even those
that are against him. He must see that his client discloses, if ordered, all relevant
documents, even those that are fatal to his case. He must disregard the specific
instructions of his client, if they conflict with his duty to the court.
END QUOTE
QUOTE Byrne v Byrne (1965) 7 FLR 342 at 343

Fraud: Usually takes the form of a statement of what is false or the suppression of what is true.
END QUOTE
County Civil Court: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Pleading – The trial court properly granted relief when the defendant perpetuated a
fraud on the court. Affirmed. Balogh Enterprises, Inc. v. Billy E. Humphries, No. 2012-AP-000006-WS, (Fla. 6th Cir.App.Ct.
June 24, 2013).
S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v. Doane's Administraters (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall.
54), "The prosecutor is not a witness; and he should not be permitted to add to the record
either by subtle or gross improprieties. Those who have experienced the full thrust of the
power of government when leveled against them know that the only protection the citizen
has is in the requirement for a fair trial."
Donnelly v. Dechristoforo, 1974.SCT.41709 ¶ 56; 416 U.S. 637 (1974) McNally v. U.S., 483
U.S. 350, 371-372, Quoting U.S. v Holzer, 816 F.2d. 304, 307 Fraud in its elementary
common law sense of deceit... includes the deliberate concealment of material information
in a setting of fiduciary obligation.
A public official is a fiduciary toward the public,... and if he deliberately conceals material
information from them he is guilty of fraud.
I view the same should be applied when a member of Congress conceals from the Senate relevant
details. In fact, this ought to be deemed CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS or CONTEMPT OF
THE SENATE.
Member of Congress Adam Schiff instead of being disbarred from making false claims about
“EVIDENCE” of President Donald J Trump being a (Russian collusion) TRAITOR goes on to
even lead an impeachment (1.0) against a sitting president. He did not reveal to the Senate what
any evidence existed in favour of the President regarding the Ukraine issue at all. Indeed his
conduct was shrouded as I view it in deception, concealing relevant details.
The instigators of all this vile bile ought to be considered accomplices to the criminal conduct of
Joe Biden and Senator Kamala Harris (as she then was) to profess to have committed crimes by
conspiracies, a felony that bars them if convicted from holding public office.
https://trishintel.com/eric-swalwell-compares-trump-to-osama-bin-laden/
Eric Swalwell compares Trump to Osama Bin Laden
QUOTE
January 14, 2021
‘Osama Bin Laden did not enter U.S. soil on September 11, but it was widely acknowledged that he was
responsible for inspiring the attack on our country,’ Rep. Eric Swalwell told PBS on Wednesday.
‘And the president, with his words, using the word ‘fight’ – that is hate speech that inspired and radicalized
people to storm the Capitol.’

PBS host Judy Woodruff pressed Swalwell if he was comparing President Trump to Bin Laden, and Swalwell
replied: ‘I’m comparing the words of a individual who would incite and radicalize somebody, as Osama Bin
Laden did, to what President Trump did.”
‘You don’t actually have to commit the violence yourself, but if you call others to violence, that itself is
a crime.’
END QUOTE
It is by this clear, that where both then Senator Kamala Harris and Joe Biden self-professed to
have committed conspiracies by using the term “we”;
Joe Biden “we’re in a situation where we have put together”
Senator Kamala Harris: “And they should not, and we should not. ”
Both by using the word “we” which is plural underlines that either one of them were part of a
conspiracy to deny citizens their FREE EXERCISE rights.
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-fact-check-biden-voter-protection-not-idUSKBN27E2VH
QUOTE
The clip shared by Trump, McEnany and others starts around the 19:13 mark, when Biden
tells Pfeiffer and Lovett, “Secondly,
we’re in a situation where we
have put together—and you guys did it for President
Obama’s administration before this—we have put
together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter
fraud organization in the history of American politics.”
END QUOTE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5THZGzrXmU
Dan Bongino – Media Sit in Shameful Silence as Pres Sec
interviewer: ...... protest still happening..

That is right. They are not going to
Senator Kamala Harris:
stop. They are not going to stop. And this is a
movement they are not going to stop. And everyone
be aware that they are not going to stop. They are
not going to stop before election day in November.
And they are not going to stop after election day.
And that should be everyone taking notice of this
on both levels. This is, they are not going to let up.
And they should not, and we should not.
Repeat:
Hence, those statements should have been more than sufficient for law enforcement agencies to
have acted upon, however the FBI in my view was instead aiding and abetting as I view was the
DOJ such as former Attorney-General William Barr as to downplay this all, and so the MSM and
Big Tech.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/rep-marjorie-taylor-greene-blasts-democrats-
supporting-riots-triggers-media-censored-mask-anti-impeachment-
speech/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=the-gateway-
pundit&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=daily
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Blasts Democrats for Supporting Riots, Triggers Media With
‘CENSORED’ Mask During Anti-Impeachment Speech
By Kristinn Taylor
Published January 13, 2021 at 2:36pm
478 Comments
QUOTE
“Thank you. Madam Speaker I am against the impeachment
effort by the Democrats. President Trump has held over six
hundred rallies in the last four years. None of them included
assaulting police, destroying businesses or burning down
cities. Democrats have spent all this time endorsing and
enabling violent riots that left billions in property damage and
forty-seven dead across the United States. Democrats are on
record supporting violence when it serves their cause–in
their own words, on social media, on interviews and on
fundraising platform ActBlue. Democrats support defunding
the police when it’s someone else’s city, someone else’s
home and someone else’s business. Democrats will take
away everyone’s guns just as long as they have guards with
guns. Democrats’ impeachment of President Trump today
has now set the standard that they should be removed for
their support of violence against the American people. I yield
back. Thank you.”
END QUOTE
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/01/actblue-june-protests-coronavirus-347492campaign
finance
Record cash floods Democrats, Black groups amid protests and pandemic
https://www.sltrib.com/news/2020/08/19/state-senator-under/
State senator under investigation for allegedly donating money for paint used in district attorney’s office
protest
QUOTE
A Utah state senator and four others are being investigated for small donations they made
to a protester accused of buying paint spilled outside the Salt Lake County District
Attorney’s Office during anti-police violence demonstrations.
Sen. Derek Kitchen, D-Salt Lake City, told The Salt Lake Tribune on Wednesday that he
did donate to Madalena McNeil’s Venmo account, a platform used for mobile payments.
McNeil has been charged with a first-degree felony in connection with the July 9 protest
that ended with confrontations with police and damage to the district attorney’s office.
END QUOTE
To apply this legal principle then the Democrats who were funding BLM, which was involved in
destruction, and even killing of people then they too should be charges. It appears to me the
Democrats desired the riots, etc, and regardless of the killing of people Kamala Harris made clear
they were not going to stop. And, well funding the BLM for this I view should make them liable
for criminal charges as they funding BLM are clearly inciting by this the continuation of the
violence and killings, etc.
Again:
WeatherMen III – ALL4FLOYD – .1:25:11 ( Regarding an Email I received on 20200716)
QUOTE
1 Bernie 2020 $186,780,034
2 Biden for President $119,253,857
3 Elizabeth Warren Presidential Exploratory Cmte $93,478,053
4 Pete for America $78,100,960
5 Democratic Congressional Campaign Cmte $55,684,604
6 Amy for America $43,167,720
7 Friends of Andrew Yang $31,705,527
8 Democratic Senatorial Campaign Cmte $31,067,413
9 Democratic National Cmte $29,924,707
10 Amy McGrath for Senate $29,558,536
END QUOTE
Therefore, not only promoting, condoning, approving and inciting but even finally supporting
those involved in murderous riots I view must prevent those who are involved in such serious
hideous crimes to attain the highest office and even the risk to have access to use nuclear
weapons.
What was in my view shown was that even SCOTUS were cowards to step in and uphold the
legal principles embedded in the constitution. Perhaps they held better to ive in to the murderous
rioters then to risk to have them to continue. Just that the 6 January even was simply boiling over
of what was predicted by many months beforehand. Nothing to do with whatever speech
President Donald J Trump gave on 6 January. One doesn’t make pipebombs instantly. One needs
to get the materials and time to create them.
And where the Antifa and BLM coordinator was directing as well as participating in the damages
and yet allowed to leave without bail required that may just underline the political cloud that
exist against law enforcement.
So Brendan Hunt may rather be considered a “VICTIM” who was faced with a life of possible
communism and he as well as any family member being rounded up for daring to support a
President who improved his and untold other Americans their lives.
Brendan Hunt facing the avalanche of incitements that those who somehow were supporting or
even worked for President Donald J Trump Administration all were to be one way or another
pursued, etc. His call for action may very well have been to seek to avoid becoming a so called
collateral damage person in the political charged environment.
Again:

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/politics/new-yorker-called-for-public-execution-of-pelosi-aoc-
and-schumer-prosecutors/ar-BB1cVC2R?ocid=msedgdhp
QUOTE
DuCharme said.
END QUOTE
So where were then Attorney-General William Barr, the FBI and numerous others in dealing
with those Members of Congress and their associates/accomplices to hold them legally
accountable? Why is the actual inspiring and funding of murderous riots even against federal
court houses somehow of a far lesser consideration then a person holding that the LAW OF THE
JUNGLE now seems to apply and one simply was left no alternative but to TAKE THE LAW
INTO ONCE OWN HANDS.
QUOTE In R v Hall (Warwick & Asizes, 1-4-1845. Maule J.) (1845)

Be it so; yet you had no right to take the law into your own hands, I will tell you what you
ought to have done, and if you did know, I will tell you that the law conclusively presumes
that you did.
END QUOTE
Well, when the judicature refuses to engage in sensible hearings to consider “evidence” then
there is no rule of law left to rely upon. The judicature then went AOWL (Absence without
leave) in the hope that the law of the jungle would prevail. No other reasonable conclusion can
be drawn when judges who are highly paid then turn their backs against the rule of law and
ignore their oath of office and so to uphold the legal principles embedded in the constitution.
.
They are the once who disgraced their courts time and time again. Perhaps they are so
incriminated that they rather go along with whatever blackmail was upon them then to honour
their oaths of offices and so to uphold the constitution.
.
In my view, every judge who failed to appropriately deal with the “evidence” by this was feeding
the lairs that there was no “evidence” when clearly Joe Biden himself had made clear:
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-fact-check-biden-voter-protection-not-idUSKBN27E2VH
QUOTE
The clip shared by Trump, McEnany and others starts around the 19:13 mark, when Biden
tells Pfeiffer and Lovett, “Secondly,
we’re in a situation where we
have put together—and you guys did it for President
Obama’s administration before this—we have put
together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter
fraud organization in the history of American politics.”
END QUOTE
This statement in itself in my view was sufficient for law enforcement agencies to prosecute Joe
Biden. After all this was an admission of past as well as current fraudulent conduct in elections.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5THZGzrXmU
Dan Bongino – Media Sit in Shameful Silence as Pres Sec
interviewer: ...... protest still happening..

That is right. They are not going to
Senator Kamala Harris:
stop. They are not going to stop. And this is a
movement they are not going to stop. And everyone
be aware that they are not going to stop. They are
not going to stop before election day in November.
And they are not going to stop after election day.
And that should be everyone taking notice of this
on both levels. This is, they are not going to let up.
Repeat:
Again, this was more than sufficient evidence that Senator kamala Harris as a lawmaker was
condoning, approving, promoting and inciting murderous riots in regard to a presidential 2020
election.
The legal doctrine of “ex turpi causa non oritur action” denies any remedy to a litigant
(including a prosecutor) who does not come to court with clean hands.
If your own action is very unlawful and very unethical, if you come to court with “Dirty Hands”
best not to question others legality, morality, and ethics!
It ought to be clear that the very persons now so to say ganging up against Brendan Hunt simply
are not the least interested in holding up the rule of law as if they were they could have avoided
the entire 6 January 2021 episode by having arrested the real culprits and their
accomplices/associates. But again, in my view a national tragedy came about due to the gross
incompetence of law enforcement agencies which I view much can also be blamed on former
Attorney-General William Barr for claiming there was not sufficient evidence when notably Joe
Biden’s statement in itself should have been sufficient for a proper investigation to have
commenced even before the 2020 presidential elections were held.
And after all as I understand it the election equipment were still holding the records of past
presidential elections and so it could be checked to what extend then past elections were subject
to election fraud.
George W Bush showed the world that you can mass murder people of another country using a
pre-emptive strike mantra against non-existing WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) and well
no one is going to hold you accountable to the mass murder as after all that is just collateral
damage when it comes to political benefits one can obtain.

Well, Brendan Hunt and many others may simply have concluded that a pre-emptive strike was
needed to prevent the self professed criminals to take office they stole from President Donald J
Trump.
There can be no excuse for then VP Mike pence to have failed to act in accordance to his laid up
constitutional duties and so to say rolling over to the Democrats demands.
These massive murderous riots during 2020 were so to say a prelude for what would happen if
Joe Biden was not installed as President, albeit while it may appear he was in legal terms he
never was nor is. No one can benefit of his own criminal activities.
The admission of fraud by Joe Biden disqualified himself as a candidate for presidential election
and as such, President Donald J Trump was re-elected.
As the Australian courts time and time again made clear it doesn’t matter if you were sworn into
an office, if you were not qualified then the swearing in has no value at all. It is a non-event.
.I view Chief Justice John Roberts became an accessory to the crimes Joe Biden professed to
have committed by instead of arresting him as any judge is obligated to do when a criminal is
still in process of a criminal act, he so to say rolled over and joined in the criminal activity.
https://thehill.com/policy/technology/534099-twitter-says-lock-on-gop-congresswomans-
account-was-result-of-incorrect
Twitter says lock on GOP congresswoman's account was result of 'incorrect enforcement action'
We now seem to have that Twitter has taken over and becomes the law “enforcement” agency as
to what may suit the Democrats.
.
https://www.westernjournal.com/justice-sotomayor-accidentally-makes-racist-move-swearing-
kamala/?ff_source=Email&ff_medium=conservative-brief-WJ&ff_campaign=dailypm&ff_content=western-journal
Justice Sotomayor Accidentally Makes 'Racist' Move While Swearing Kamala In
I am a person whom Christian name causes problems for people to pronounce it correctly and I
Generally explain to just pronounce my name as they are able to do. I do not consider this to be
insulting, as in a multi cultural society there will be names that for some persons may be difficult
to pronounce. I often pronounce matters phonetic and my wife never stop berating me for it,
however, that is how I find it to my likings to pronounce words. Yet, when others pronounce
“Kamala” in their way then it is racist but when a judge does the same then it is a “accidental”
error.
The word “racist” is by far over used. We had Joe Biden announcing special provisions for
“women” (ignoring Nancy Pelosi ruling) and all kinds of people of colour albeit not white
skinned persons. This is racism all right and he claimed to be president for all Americans. Come
on the deception can be seen a mile away.
https://www.westernjournal.com/schumer-admits-reason-vindictive-second-impeachment-
trump/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=conservative-brief-WJ&utm_campaign=dailypm&utm_content=western-
journal&ats_es=14d63ad63339a8c4f9a817f5e715c34b
Schumer Admits Reason for Vindictive Second Impeachment of Trump
QUOTE
The most critical sentence in his entire address is as follows (emphasis mine): “We need to
set a precedent that the severest offense ever committed by a president will be met by the
severest remedy provided by the Constitution — impeachment and conviction by this
chamber, as well as disbarment from future office.“
I repeat. “Disbarment from future office.”
END QUOTE

QUOTE
According to an article by Michael J. Gerhardt, the Burton Craige Distinguished Professor of
Jurisprudence at the University of North Carolina School of Law, “through a separate vote after he
is convicted, Trump may be subject to the unique constitutional penalty of disqualification.”
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the goal.
The “Washington establishment,” a group that includes longtime Republicans as well as Democrats,
is united in making sure that Trump is unable to seek the presidency ever again.
END QUOTE

QUOTE
RELATED: Agitated Pelosi Snaps at Reporter Over AOC Question: 'That Was Kind of Sharp'
This characterization is false. Period.
First, FBI documents from the day prior to the Capitol incursion, reviewed by media outlets such
as The Washington Post, disprove this charge. I wrote about this here and here earlier this week.
END QUOTE
As I refereed to previously:
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/89309/united-states-v-cruikshank/?
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876)
QUOTE
*548 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.
This case comes here with a certificate by the judges of the Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana that
they were divided in opinion upon a question which occurred at the hearing. It presents for our consideration
an indictment containing sixteen counts, divided into two series of eight counts each, based upon sect. 6 of
the Enforcement Act of May 31, 1870. That section is as follows:—
"That if two or more persons shall band or conspire together, or go in disguise upon the public highway, or
upon the premises of another, with intent to violate any provision of this act, or to injure, oppress, threaten, or
intimidate any citizen, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise and enjoyment of any right or
privilege granted or secured to him by the constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having
exercised the same, such persons shall be held guilty of felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be fined or
imprisoned, or both, at the discretion of the court, — the fine not to exceed $5,000, and the imprisonment not
to exceed ten years; and shall, moreover, be thereafter ineligible to, and disabled from holding, any
office or place of honor, profit, or trust created by the constitution or laws of the United States." 16
Stat. 141.
END QUOTE
Therefor the proper way to pursue any conduct against your father would be to pursue him for a
felony charge. This however the Congress cannot do. Members of Congress rather continue to
disgrace the Congress with their political motives than to observe the true meaning and
application of the Constitution, and this ought to underline how disastrous low the Congress has
sunk.
As I understand it every Members of the House vacates his/her seat upon election being called.
This as you can have only one Member for each seat,
Hansard 2-4-1891 Constitution Convention Debates

QUOTE
Sir JOHN BRAY: I am very glad to hear that the committee considered the point, although I think
they arrived at a very unwise decision. The hon. gentleman who last spoke is mistaken in what I take to
be the drift of all parliaments. No parliament lives out the full term of its existence. It is always
dissolved before it actually expires, and so it would be in this [start page 645] case. The practice almost
invariably is for the house to be dissolved, and a new house elected, before the expiration of the three
years, the object being that there shall always be a parliament in existence. The intention is not that the

members shall be elected for three years, but that they shall absolutely serve for three years, and the
three years ought for the sake of convenience to date from the first meeting of parliament.
END QUOTE
Therefore, the Members-elect even if they are not taking up their seat(s) subsequently
nevertheless are called.
Nancy Pelosi as a Speaker and an official of the House of Representatives is only so while being
a Member of the House of Representatives and not otherwise. Where the California ballots were
invalid within California legal provisions and couldn’t be counted that for this Nancy Pelosi no
longer was lawfully a Member of the House of Representatives and neither so could be a
Speaker.
THE ELIFANT IN THE ROOM:
https://uncoverdc.com/2020/12/17/california-clearly-violated-election-law-votes-are-invalid/
California Clearly Violated Election Law—Votes are Invalid
This then means that she held no official function to swear in any Member of the House of
Representatives. Actually as each term had expired at the time of the election being called/held
then each and every person even those re-elected must make a new oath/affirmation. And with
Nancy Pelosi out then I view not a single person was appropriately sworn in. This also underlines
that the purported vote of impeachment 2.0 has no legal validity for this also.
https://www.westernjournal.com/az-election-audit-moving-forward-county-officials-finally-agree-turn-subpoenaed-
info/?ff_source=Email&ff_medium=conservative-brief-WJ&ff_campaign=dailypm&ff_content=western-journal
AZ Election Audit Moving Forward: County Officials Finally Agree to Turn Over All
Subpoenaed Info
QUOTE
“I am pleased to announce that after a hard-fought battle to seek information on behalf of Arizona voters
regarding the integrity of the 2020 election, we have reached a favorable agreement with the Maricopa
County Board of Supervisors,” Fann wrote.
“Not only has the Board agreed to turn over all the relevant information we sought in our subpoenas so that
we may perform an audit,” Fann continued, “but they also acknowledge that the Legislature is a sovereign
power of the state and that the county is a political subdivision, and as such, the Legislature has the
constitutional and statutory authority to issue subpoenas.”
Subpoenas brought by then-Arizona Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Eddie Farnsworth and Fann on
Dec. 15 called for the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors to turn over data from the Dominion Voting
Systems equipment, along with various reports and logs related to the election.
“There is technology that can look at those ballots to see if there are any anomalies, to see if there’s any dual
voting and whether or not these were pre-printed,” Farnsworth said in a December interview.
The Board of Supervisors, however, did not comply with the subpoenas and instead went to court to seek to
block them.
In late December, a state judge affirmed the Judiciary Committee’s right to enforce its subpoenas; however,
the Senate was not in session at the time.
Last week, when the 2021 legislative session began, new Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Warren
Petersen issued another subpoena to the Board of Supervisors, threatening legislative contempt charges if
they failed to comply.
Arizona GOP chairwoman Kelli Ward, who was aware of the ongoing negotiations between the Senate and
the Board of Supervisors, told The Western Journal on Wednesday that Arizona will be a “trailblazer” in
conducting its audit of Dominion voting machines and ballots.
END QUOTE
What appears to me to have been the case is that the Board of Supervisors pursued to delay any
compliances with the subpoenas until after the inauguration so that it would in their view that is
TOO LATE to correct any fraudulent result. Reality is:

Fraus est celare fraudem. It is a fraud to conceal a fraud. 1 Vern. 270.
Fraus et jus numquam cohabitant. Fraud and justice never agree together. Wing. 680.
Qui inique non erit aequi - He who has committed iniquity, shall not have equity.
Francis' Max., Max. 2.
Non faciat malum, ut inde veniat bonum. You are not to do evil that good may come of
it. 11 Co. 74.
http://familyguardian.tax-
tactics.com/Subjects/LawAndGovt/ChallJurisdiction/AuthoritiesArticle/AuthOnJurisdiction.htm
QUOTE
37 Am Jur 2d at section 8 states, in part: "Fraud vitiates every transaction and all contracts. Indeed, the
principle is often stated, in broad and sweeping language, that fraud destroys the validity of everything into
which it enters, and that it vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments."
END QUOTE
Taylor v. Taylor (1979) Fam LR 5, 289289 at 290 298 and 300 HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUOTE
In my opinion, the words 'false evidence' in s79A(1) do not mean evidence which is wilfully false. The sub-
section should be read according to its terms. To say that 'false evidence should be read as 'wilful false
evidence' is to introduce a provision not expressed by the provision; cf s6H of the Royal Commission Act
1902 which speaks of a witness 'who knowingly gives false testimony'. This interpretation is reinforced by
reference elsewhere in s79A(1) to the separate grounds of fraud and suppression of evidence which
would comprehend cases of wilful false evidence. At common law, a judgment will be set aside if it
has been obtained by fraud. In the exercise of this jurisdiction, it has been held that an applicant must
show something more than perjury, ie. new facts (Baker v. Wadsworth [1898] 67 LJQB 301; Everett V.
Ribbands [1946] 175 LT 143). This tends to suggest that the words 'false evidence' should be given their
literal meaning
END QUOTE
As such, it ought to be clear that contrary to anyone claiming that Joe Biden is the president and
that is the end of it, reality is that the legality of the presidency is so to say still up in the air.
While the constitution may provide certain requirements this however was and remains to be
based on inherent fair and proper elections and all legal disputes having been disposed of. This
clearly never was.
I do not see any value in if a candidate “concedes” to an election loss as former presidential
candidate Al Gore had conceded and then withdrew the same. It would be absurd indeed that a
candidate who “conceded” defeat and afterwards discovered there was an elaborate fraud and in
reality he was the successful candidate then be deemed to have nevertheless to be bound having
conceded defeat. To ‘concede” in my view merely may indicate that provided all and everything
was above board and there are no disputes then the election outcome is accepted, but if it turns
out otherwise then the election outcome cannot be deemed to have been accepted.
https://thehill.com/policy/technology/534163-trumps-snapchat-account-to-be-permanently-banned
Trump's Snapchat account to be permanently banned | TheHill
13 Jan 2021 ... The only way to end Trumpism is to deport or execute Trump. TRUMP'S COUP IS
A JOKE • Deport or execute Trump for his ...
The “Trump derangement syndrome” clearly continues even to the extent of pursuing the
execution of president Donald J Trump, not because in a court of law he was convicted but
because the deranged persons seemingly have their mind set as such. Yet, where is the law
enforcement to pursue those kind of persons?

https://thehill.com/policy/finance/banking-financial-institutions/535282-florida-bank-says-it-has-closed-trumps-
accounts?utm_source=thehill&utm_medium=widgets&utm_campaign=es_recommended_content
Florida bank says it has closed Trump's accounts
As with the Dresdner Bank it seems that there is a ganging up to destroy Donald J Trump and his
organisations. I view, that this kind of conduct must be pursued by law enforcement agencies as a
conduct of harassment, etc, but unlikely the political motivated FBI will do so.
https://www.westernjournal.com/breaking-trump-makes-good-threat-last-night-office-releases-crossfire-hurricane-
kraken/?ff_source=Email&ff_medium=WJBreaking&ff_campaign=breaking&ff_content=western-journal
Breaking: Trump Makes Good on Threat on Last Night in Office, Releases the Crossfire
Hurricane Kraken
I personally would have prefer if each and every document had been released without any
redaction, as after all the People are entitled to know what really went on. Indeed, it ought to
have been released long ago. And, I understood the push for the 25th Amendment against
President Donald J Trump was to seek to prevent him to declassify those documents. Again, I
view it is unlikely that the political motivated FBI or other law enforcement agencies would
likely pursue proper charges against any offenders. Going after a person like Brandon Hunt is a
far easier target and perhaps it may even be used to continue to smear President Donald J Trump.
While Joe Biden claim for UNITY reality is his claim it to unite against President Donald J
Trump, and anyone who is associated with him.
While many may wonder if Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are ousted from the high political
officer if then Nancy Pelosi or others may instead take then reigns. This however cannot be
legally appropriate as in the end President Donald J Trump was in my view re-elected and while
the then Vice President Mike Pence has disgraced himself and no longer could possibly be
deemed to be Vice President in the circumstances it in itself doesn’t prevent President Donald J
Trump to then replace him with a person who might be more trustworthy and reliable to serve as
Vice President. Perhaps Senator Ted Cruz or Member of Congress Hawley both having to
withstood the storm to remain adamant to uphold the constitution may be appropriate candidates
for consideration.
What is needed is a President who as President Donald J Trump showed that statesmanship is not
one that can be achieved by deception, violence, etc, but by once proven conduct to act for the
interest of all Americans. Hence, I view, President Donald J Trump despite his detractors is the
best person to be President.
Obviously, if Joe Biden never was validly sworn in as president then this even makes it worse as
to the decisions he made which cannot stand. This is why the courts should have sought to
prevent to create such a disastrous situation and as I urged previously have provided that
President Donald J Trump would continue as “CARE TAKING PRESIDENT” until at least all
existing legal issues were appropriately completed.
The discrimination against your father by MSM and Big Tech in my view should long ago
have been addressed by law enforcement agencies as to undermine the office of the
president. But they were in my too politically motivated to bother.
One need to return to the organics and legal principles embedded in of the federal constitution!
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® (Our name is our motto!)

20210123-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Donald J Trump Jr-Presidential Legality, Brendan Hunt, Etc

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

20210123-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Donald J Trump Jr-Presidential Legality, Brendan Hunt, Etc

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Donald Trump Jr (Australia) 23-1-2021

Cc: FBI @FBI

AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN.

p1 23-1-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Nancy Pelosi Floats 'Prosecution' of Republican Lawmakers

In my view, “harassment” is a criminal offense and to seek others to do so means this is 2

p3 23-1-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

And then we have:

p4 23-1-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

p5 23-1-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

p7 23-1-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Their “Trump derangement syndrome” must be exposed to every extent.

QUOTE Byrne v Byrne (1965) 7 FLR 342 at 343

p9 23-1-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

interviewer: ...... protest still happening..

p12 23-1-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

QUOTE In R v Hall (Warwick & Asizes, 1-4-1845. Maule J.) (1845)

interviewer: ...... protest still happening..

p14 23-1-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Schumer Admits Reason for Vindictive Second Impeachment of Trump

Schumer Admits Reason for Vindictive Second Impeachment of Trump

Hansard 2-4-1891 Constitution Convention Debates

p16 23-1-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

THE ELIFANT IN THE ROOM:

p17 23-1-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

p18 23-1-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

Potrebbero piacerti anche