Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 1 of 26

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
3
Ercole A Mirarchi Case No.:
4
Plaintiffs, ELECTION FRUAD
5 v. COMPLAINT FOR
6 EQUITABLE DAMAGES,
KATHY BOOCKVAR, in her capacity as PUNITIVE DAMAGES, AND
Secretary of the State of Pennsylvania; REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE
7
ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF RELIEF
8 ELECTIONS; CENTRE COUNTY BOARD OF
ELECTIONS; CHESTER COUNTY BOARD JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
9 OF ELECTIONS; DELAWARE COUNTY
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; MONTGOMERY Judge:
10
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS;
11 NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF Date Action filed: January 12, 2021
ELECTIONS; PHILADELPHIA COUNTY Date set for trial:
12 BOARD OF ELECTIONS; JOSEPH R. BIDEN;
and KAMALA D. HARRIS.
13
14 Defendants.

15 I. NATURE OF THE CASE

16
Plaintiff, ERCOLE A MIRARCHI, brings this action individually against the Defendants:
17
KATHY BOOCKVAR, in her capacity as Secretary of the State of Pennsylvania; ALLEGHENY
18
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; CENTRE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS;
19
20 CHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; DELAWARE COUNTY BOARD OF

21 ELECTIONS; MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; NORTHAMPTON

22
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; PHILADELPHIA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS;
23
JOSEPH R. BIDEN (AKA JOE BIDEN) and KAMALA D. HARRIS (hereinafter referred to
24
collectively as “Defendants,” or individually by their respective acronyms). This complaint seeks
25
26 equitable and injunctive relief to cancel Pennsylvania’s ascertainment of the vote required under

27 U.S. Code (3 U.S.C. §6), in addition to seeking to suspend or cancel the result of January 6,
28
2021 Joint Session of our Congresses Count of Electoral Votes required under US Code (3

-1-
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 2 of 26

1 U.S.C. §15), until an honest, competent and comprehensive examination explains to the Plaintiff,

2 and all Common Citizens, why is it so many geometrical mathematical constants exist, or
3
interconnects with the State of Pennsylvania, and our Nation’s, 2020 Election Vote Totals.
4
Finally, this complaint seeks treble and punitive damages for fraud and conspiracy in
5
violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C.
6
7 (sec) 1962 for Defendants’ collective and organized concealment of mathematically engineered

8 processes, and or other methods, used in an Election Fraud Scheme to nullify Plaintiff’s, and all
9
Citizens voice as to who governs us, which was devised, operated, supported or participated in
10
by many Individuals, Organizations, Corporations, Government Agencies and Foreign Countries
11
or Agencies thereof, than what is listed here in this legal filing, which at this time are unknown
12
13 to the Plaintiff, and need to be identified so they can be added to this complaint, when practical.

14
15 II. JURISDICTION and PARTIES

16 KATHY BOOCKVAR, in her capacity as Secretary and a sworn officer of the State of
17 Pennsylvania; ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; CENTRE COUNTY
18
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; CHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; DELAWARE
19
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS;
20
21 NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; and PHILADELPHIA COUNTY

22 BOARD OF ELECTIONS who carried out KATHY BOOCKVAR’s directives; JOESPH R.

23 BIDEN of Wilmington Delaware and KAMALA D. HARRIS of San Francisco California, who,
24
in their cooperative capacity was at the head of, and led, the Democratic Party’s Pennsylvania,
25
and Nationwide 2020 Presidential Campaign efforts headquartered in Philadelphia,
26
27 Pennsylvania. ERCOLE A MIRARCHI is a resident of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania where all

28 events giving rise to this incident took place. Therefore, jurisdiction of this court is proper.

-2-
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 3 of 26

1 III. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

2 1. This lawsuit is NOT about President Trump. IT’S ABOUT ELECTON FRAUD.
3
2. On November 3, 2020, a General Election for Electors for the President and Vice
4
President of our Country was held, set by law, (3 U.S.C. §1).
5
3. On this day, the Plaintiff casted a vote, in person, at a designated polling facility in
6
7 the State, County, City and District in which he resides.

8 4. The ballot the Plaintiff casted in our 2020 Election at the designated polling facility
9
assigned to the District in which he resides, recorded his vote, in what he believes was a
10
relatively new and automated Dominion Voting Booth Machine/System.
11
5. Like all citizens who patriciate in our Election process, at all times the Plaintiff was
12
13 under the belief the vote he casted on Election Day allowed him have a say in who leads

14 us at the State and Federal levels of our Government over the next 2-4 years.
15 6. Between the evening hours of November 3, 2020 through December 14, 2020 the
16
counting of popular votes took place, nationwide, and the filing of Certificates of
17
Ascertainment by each State soon followed in accordance with law (3 U.S.C. §6).
18
19 Mathematical Constants were found in our Nationwide Vote Totals.

20 7. A few weeks after our Election was held, out of curiosity, arising from hearing about
21
massive voter fraud allegations occurring in his home town, the Plaintiff reviewed our
22
Nation’s Election results, where he recognized the 80,117,578 vote total Democratic
23
Presidential Candidate Joe Biden, and his running mate Kamala Harris, had received as
24
25 of November 28, 2020, 5:17 PM, interconnected with a geometrical math constant, the

26 Golden Ratio Squared, 2.61803399, and a Reconstruction Cost Value, 601118, that was
27
hidden under the guise of a set of untrue Marshall & Swift Building Appraisal Records,
28

-3-
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 4 of 26

1 which ironically, was unfairly and criminally used against the Plaintiff in an unrelated

2 litigation, heard here in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
3
8. The series of arithmetic calculations below, which is from a larger analysis
4
somewhat recently submitted to Authorities to review in regards to this matter, support
5
the allegation Plaintiff made in Paragraph 7, by showing how the square root (of the
6
7 geometrical math constant, the Golden Ratio squared, 2.61803399, multiplied by a

8 variation of the square root of a value, 601118, that was hidden under the guise of a set of
9
untrue building appraisal records used against the Plaintiff in an unrelated civil litigation
10
heard in the Eastern District Court) equates to the number of Nationwide votes the
11
Associated Press reported for Joe Biden, 80,117,578, as of 11/28/2020, 5:17 PM.
12
, is numerically about equal to the"601118"
13 Reconstruction Cost Value hidden in the untrue
(((0.80117578^2)/2.61803399)^2) = 0.0601119 Report, Seneca 1398-1401.
14
, is about equal to the Golden Ratio Squared,
15 ((0.80117578^2)/SQRT(0.0601118)) = 2.61803686 (1.61803399^2) = 2.61803399.
, is numerically, a small difference of 44 votes from
16
Biden's "80,117,578" votes cast in the 2020
SQRT(2.61803399*SQRT(0.0601118)) = 0.80117534 Presidential Election as of 11/28/2020, 5:17 PM.
17
18
9. It was at this time the Plaintiff realized our Elections may have been RIGGED using
19
20 some sort of a math process, and or other unknown methods, from the start, which if so,

21 the vote he or anyone else in our Country casted in our 2020 Election, didn’t count, at all.
22 And what made the Plaintiff realize our Election was rigged, was the values hidden under
23
the guise of the untrue records identified in Paragraphs 7 & 8 was involved in a 2008
24
multi-billion-dollar accounting and securities fraud scheme a few Courts, Congress, SEC,
25
26 FBI and USDOJ are all aware of, but to date, ignored and or dismissed it at the expense,

27 livelihood and well-being of the Plaintiff, which is a separate, but now somewhat loosely

28 related matter, which at this time won’t be discussed past Paragraphs 10 & 44 of this filing.

-4-
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 5 of 26

1 10. To be sure of the serious allegation collectively raised in Paragraphs 7, 8, & 9, which

2 would mean High Treason and or a Coup was taking place here in our Country, over the
3
next month the Plaintiff continued to monitor our 2020 Presidential Election result vote
4
totals as updates came in, at which time he continued to observe how geometrical math
5
constants, (and or values hidden under the guise of a set of untrue building appraisal records used against the
6
Plaintiff in an unrelated litigation which Authorities are aware of, but ignored and or decided to cover up, which will
7
8 not be discussed or evaluated further at this time) interconnect with the vote totals from our 2020

9 Presidential Election, which the series of arithmetic calculations below demonstrates.

10
“360” is the number of degrees in a “Circle”. (3.14159*2) is “2Pi”, commonly referred to as “Tau”.
11
SQRT((81.029063^2)/2) = 57.296 , is 1 Radian, (360/(3.14159*2)) = 57.296.
12
, is numerically a “536” vote difference from
13 Biden's "81,029,063" vote total, as of, 11:59 PM,
Thursday, December 3, 2020, 30 days or 1 month
14 SQRT(((360/(3.14159*2))^2)*2) = 81.028537 after our Election was held.

, is equal to the number "2", whose inverse is

15 "0.5", which both values are commonly used in
((81.029063^2)/((360/(3.14159*2))^2)) = 2 engineering and in different mathematic formulas.
16
17
11. The fact a radian can be arithmetically derived from the 2020 Presidential Election
18
vote total for Democratic Presidential Candidate, Joe Biden, confirmed the Plaintiff’s
19
20 vote rigging suspicion, for the reason a radian is an International Systems of Units (SI)

21 measure for a circle, or, more specifically, the length of an arc of a circle. A radian is a
22 dimensionless value, so the only way it can be uncovered is with the use of Arithmetic.
23
12. Moreover, to learn a radian exists and can be derived from our 2020 Presidential
24
Election vote totals, is proof to show and or expose a math process of some type was
25
26 being used, for unknown reasons, which frankly speaking, could be for no other purpose

27 other than to rig the results of our 2020 Presidential Election to favor one candidate over
28 the other, which in this case, had to have been to favor Biden/Harris over Trump/Pence.

-5-
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 6 of 26

1 13. So, out of an abundance of caution, when the vote totals for our 2020 Presidential

2 Election changed on December 6, 2020, the Plaintiff conducted another review to make
3
sure the vote rigging claim he had made was true, and once again, he uncovered another
4
series of arithmetic calculations, shown below, to support his claim of geometrical math
5
constants interconnecting with, and or replicating the vote totals from our 2020 Election.
6
7 The 1st calculation below uses the 12/6/2020 vote totals for Biden 81,255,933 and Trump 74,196,153.
8 The 2nd calculation uses all Geometrical Math Constants to attain a like result as in the 1st calculation.
Variables:
9
- “3.1415927”, is “PI”, “2.61803399”, is the Golden Ratio Squared, and “1.618” is one of
10 several commonly referred to values for the Golden Ratio, which when Cubed (raised to the 3rd
11 Power) creates another math constant common to Sacred Geometry.
(81.255933-74.196153) = 7.059780 , which is numerically a 4 vote difference.
12
(((2.61803399*2)/ 3.1415927)*(1.618^3)) = 7.059776
13
Math constants were also found in the State of Pennsylvania’s Popular Vote Totals.
14
15 14. On 11/24/2020, Pennsylvania completed counting votes and certified their Election
16 results in favor of Democratic Candidates Biden/Harris, who received 3,458,229 votes,
17
Republican Candidates Trump/Pence receiving 3,377,674 votes, and Libertarian
18
Candidate Jo Jorgensen receiving 79,380 votes, totaling to 6,915,283 votes between them.
19
20 15. The first calculation below shows how the inverse of the total number of votes casted

21 in Pennsylvania’s (PA) for the three Presidential Candidates listed on their ballot, shown

22 on Paragraph 14, squared, multiplied by 2x’s Golden Ratio squared, squared, equates to a
23
radian, which is commonly referred to as 57.3 degrees. The two calculations that follow,
24
once again, show geometric math constants can replicate vote values from PA’s Election.
25
, equates to 1 Radian, (360/(3.1416)) = 57.296, when rounded
26 (((1/0.6915283)^2)*((2.61803399*2)^2)) = 57.3 is “57.3”, a commonly referred to, and used, value for it.
27 (57.3/(10-1.618)) = 6.836077 , is a -174 vote difference from the vote total Pennsylvania certified for
Biden and Trump. NOTE: The Math Constants “1.618” is identified in
28 (3.458229+3.377674) = 6.835903 Paragraph 13, and “10”, is dummy value representing 100% of value.

-6-
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 7 of 26

1 16. However, a few weeks after the State of Pennsylvania’s vote certification, as of

2 12/31/2020, the Associated Press (AP), and other news outlets alike, show the final vote
3
totals for the State of Pennsylvania to be 2,300 votes higher, with Democratic Candidate
4
Biden gaining 1,694 votes, now having 3,459,923 votes, Republican Candidate Trump
5
gaining 589 votes, now having 3,378,263 votes, and the Libertarian candidate Jorgensen
6
7 gaining 17 votes, now having 79,397 votes, for a total of 6,917,583 votes between them.

8 17. Applying the same arithmetic logic described in Paragraph 15, to the total vote value
9
listed in Paragraph 16, the calculation below shows the 2,300 vote change the AP reported
10
for all three candidates listed on Pennsylvania’s ballot did not affect the overall result.
11
(((1/0.6917583)^2)*((2.61803399*2)^2)) = 57.293 , is about equal to 1 Radian, (360/(3.1416)) = 57.296.
12
13 18. Additionally, as of 12/31/2020, the Associated Press (AP) and other news outlets
14 alike list the total votes cast nationwide for Democrat Presidential Candidate Joe Biden to
15
be 81,283,485 votes, for Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump to be
16
74,223,744 votes, totaling to 155,507,229 votes between the two presidential candidates,
17
18 which this calculation replicates using Fibonacci No. Series values, (233/144) = 1.618056.

19 (SQRT(10-(1.618056^4))-1.618056) = 0.155506816 , is a 413 difference from the AP’s vote total 155,507,229

20 19. Take notice, when the total vote value identified in Paragraph 17 is changed to a
21
decimal, divided by the math constant Pi, then taking the square root of the result,
22
equates to the Reflex of the Golden Angle, which is another geometrical math value.
23
NOTE: The 2nd calculation below deducts 2,283 votes from what the Associated Press added to Pennsylvania’s
24
11/24/2020 certified vote total for Joe Biden and Donald Trump, which is listed and discussed in Paragraph 18.
25
26 , is about equal to the Reflex of the Golden
SQRT(0.155507229/3.1416) = 0.22248
Angle, (0.360/1.61803399) = 0.22249, and it
27 equals a variation it using the “Fibonacci 618”
SQRT((0.155507229-0.000002283)/3.1416) = 0.22248 investing value, (0.360/(1/0.618)) = 0.22248.
28

-7-
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 8 of 26

1 20. And recognize, the nationwide vote total used in the calculations shown in Paragraph

2 19 have to first be converted to a decimal value before being divided by Pi, after which
3
the square-root is taken, so the Reflex of the Golden Angle association can be uncovered,
4
which cannot be considered a coincidence, for the reason, at a State of Arizona legislature
5
hearing about voting fraud, held on 11/30/2020, a Mathematician testified as to how the
6
7 Dominion Voting Booth Machine/System stores votes, not as a whole integers, but as

8 decimal values, which can be manipulated by using an internal “weighted race feature”,
9
or by an external program. This testimony is publically available on YouTube, see Dr
10
Shiva Ayyadurai, MIT PhD Testimony 113020 - YouTube, around minutes 13:00
11
through minutes 32:34, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwHa1pfyJjc .
12
13 21. The next series of calculations below continue to show geometrical math constants

14 interconnecting with values from our 2020 Election, in this case the difference between
15 the vote total values the State of Pennsylvania tallied and certified (on 11/24/2020) for
16
both Biden and Trump, to the 232 Electoral Votes Trump won in our 2020 Election.
17
(3.458229-3.377674) = 0.080555
18
(SQRT(232)/((36.0/(1.61803399^2))^2)) = 0.080554
19 ((3.458229-3.377674)/(SQRT(232)/((360/(1.61803399^2))^2))) = 100 , is equal to 100% of value.
20 , is a difference of -1 vote
from what the State Of PA
21 certified for Trump on
(3.458229-(SQRT(232)/((36.0/(1.61803399^2))^2))) = 3.377675 11/24/2020, “3,377,674”.
22
, is a difference of 1 vote
23 from what the State Of PA
certified for Biden on
24 (3.377674+(SQRT(232)/((36.0/(1.61803399^2))^2))) = 3.458228 11/24/2020 “3,458,229”.
, is equal to the “232”
25 Electoral Votes Donald
Trump received in our
26 (((3.458229-3.377674)*((36.0/(1.61803399^2))^2))^2) = 232.0 2020 Presidential Election.
, is about equal to the
27 Golden Angle, expressed
as (36.0/(1.61803399^2))
28 SQRT(SQRT(232)/(3.458229-3.377674)) = 13.75073 = 13.75078.

-8-
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 9 of 26

1 22. The next calculation below shows the core logic in the series of calculations listed in

2 Paragraph 21 can be expanded upon to equate to a radian, which continues to support a

3
math process, using geometrical math constants, was used by someone to rig our 2020
4
Election, which could be for no other reason than to favor one candidate over the other.
5
6 , is about equal to a Radian,
SQRT(1/(((0.3458229-0.3377674)*((0.360/(1.61803399^2))^2)*2))) = 57.294 (360/(3.1416)) = 57.296.
7
8 The number of Electoral Votes Biden and Trump received was predetermined.
9
23. The calculation below, using Microsoft EXCEL Trigonometry Math Functions, show
10
Biden/Harris 306 Electoral Votes equals, negative, ½ the Golden Ratio.
11
12 SIN(RADIANS(306)) = -0.809016994 , equates to ½ of the Golden Ratio, (1.61803399/2) = 0.809016995.

13 24. The next calculation shows how geometrical math constants, or values, the Reflex of
14
the Golden Angle divided by the Golden Angle equals the 306 Electoral Votes Joe Biden
15
received in our 2020 Presidential Election. NOTE: To save room on the line of the calculation listed in
16
Paragraph 25, the Golden Ratio Constant was truncated from 1.61803399 to 1.618. The reason why the Golden Ratio
17
is truncated in the calculation below, is to keep the same suit, to make the connection pointed out easy to recognize.
18
, is equal to the “306” Electoral
19 ((36.0/1.618)*(36.0/(1.618^2))) = 306 Votes Biden received in 2020.

20 25. The next calculation below is a factored out version of the 6th calculation listed in
21
Paragraph 21, which shows how geometrical math constants connect the 306 Electoral
22
Votes Biden received to the difference between Pennsylvania’s certified vote totals for
23
Biden and Trump, see Paragraph 14, to equal the 232 Electoral Votes Trump received,
24
25 further supporting a math process was used, which could be for no other purpose but to

26 rig the outcome of our 2020 Presidential Election in favor of a preferred candidate.
27 , is equal to the “232”
Electoral Votes Trump
28 ((((3.458229-3.377674)*0.618)*((36.0/1.618)*(36.0/(1.618^2))))^2) = 232 received in 2020.

-9-
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 10 of 26

1 26. The series of calculations below support Paragraph 21 - 25, by showing whoever it

2 was (foreign and or domestic individuals, corporations, organizations and governments) who conspired to rig
3
our 2020 Presidential Election, from the start, used math processes predicated on
4
geometrical values related to a circle to formulate how Biden/Harris was, from the start,
5
always going to receive 306 Electoral Votes, and Trump/Pence 232 Electoral Votes.
6
7
“3.60” represents the 360 degrees of a Circle.
8
“6”, represents the equal parts of a circle based on this Cubit measure, (3.1416-2.618) = 0.5236, or
9 (0.5236*6) = 3.1416, where “3.1416” represents Pi, and “2.618” is a commonly referred to value for
10 the Golden Ratio Squared.

11 ((6-3.14)-(3.60-3.06)) = 2.32 , is equal to the "232" Electoral Votes Joe Biden received in 2020.

12 (3.60-((6-3.14)-2.32)) = 3.06 , is equal to the "306" Electoral Votes Donald Trump received in 2020.
((6-3.14)+(3.06-2.32)) = 3.60 , is numerically equal to the "360" degrees of a Circle.
13 (3.60-(3.06-2.32)) = 2.86 , is equal to a variation of "Six minus Pi" logic, expressed as (6-3.14) = 2.86.

14 (6-(3.60-(3.06-2.32))) = 3.14 , is equal to one of several commonly referred to values for Pi, "3.14".
, is equal to the number "6", too which there are six parts to a 360 degree
15 ((3.60-(3.06-2.32))+3.14) = 6.00 circle based on the logic shown above.

16
27. The next calculation is a variant of the ones in Paragraph 26, only without the 3.60
17
value, which equals the Reflex of the Golden Angle, which supports that logic has merit.
18
, is equal to the commonly referred to value for the Reflex of the
19 (1/(((6-3.14)-(3.06-2.32))^2)) = 0.2225 Golden Angle, (0.360-0.1375) = 0.2225.
20
28. The six states below are the ones identified as having their votes, and Electoral
21
Votes, compromised to favor Biden/Harris over Trump/Pence in our 2020 Election.
22
23 State Electoral Votes
24 Arizona 11
Georgia 16
25 Michigan 16
26 Wisconsin 10
Pennsylvania 20
27 Nevada 06

28 Total: 79

- 10 -
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 11 of 26

1 29. The series of arithmetic calculations shown below support the number of Electoral

2 Votes, identified in Paragraph 28, needed to provide Biden/Harris with 306 Electoral
3
Votes, also interconnects with geometrical math constants and values.
4
, is equal to a numeric variation of Pi, “3.14”, divided by the
5 SQRT(79/306) = 0.5081 “Fibonacci 618” investing value, (0.314/0.618) = 0.5081.

6 (((0.314/0.618)^2)*306) = 79 , is the number of Electoral Votes, “79”, for AZ, GA, MI, WI, PA, & NV.
, is equal to the "306" electoral votes Biden/Harris received to win our
7 (79/((0.314/0.618)^2)) = 306 2020 US Presidency.

8
30. The calculation below, using Microsoft EXCEL Trigonometry Math Functions,
9
support Paragraphs 23 - 29 by showing Biden/Harris 306 Electoral Votes interconnects
10
11 with Trump/Pence 232 Electoral Votes, to equate to 1 degree, whose inverse value is

12 equal to 1 radian, which further supports mathematical logic, and processes, was used to
13 rig our 2020 Election result in favor of one candidate/ticket, over the other, which
14
nullified the Plaintiff, and all common-folk Citizens vote, no matter who they chose to
15
vote for as President, and likely other State and Federal Offices voted on in that Election.
16
17 SIN(RADIANS(COS(RADIANS(SIN(RADIANS(306))+SIN(RADIANS(232)))))) = 0.017446, equates to 1

18 Degree, whose inverse is 1 Radian, ((3.14*2)/360) = 0.017444, or ((3.1416*2)/360) = 0.01745.

19
There is something suspect about the small increase in votes the Associated Press (AP)
20
found to be added to Pennsylvania’s vote after certifying a win for Biden/Harris.
21
31. The AP’s 12/31/2020 Pennsylvania Presidential vote total for Biden/Harris, which an
22
23 internet search showed didn’t change as of 1/8/2020, was 3,459,923. The AP also list the

24 sum of Biden and Trump’s nationwide vote total as 155,507,229. The calculation below
25
shows when Biden/Harris PA vote is divided by sum of (Biden and Trump’s) nationwide
26
vote total, it equates to the geometrical math value the Reflex of the Golden Angle.
27
, which numerically equates to the Reflex Angle of the Golden Angle,
28 (3.459923/155.507229) = 0.02224927 expressed as (0.0360/1.61803399) = 0.02224922.

- 11 -
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 12 of 26

1 32. In various disciplines (Engineering, Physics, Finance, etc.) mathematical constants

2
such as the Golden Ratio, Pi, e, etc. all have many different variations for each. There are
3
no rules as to what variation of a mathematical constant will be used in a process, or how
4
5 they are used in an application (i.e. target value vs. being an actual value), for the reason

6 this is determined by, and at the discretion of, the “User”. With this being said, for the
7 math constant Pi, some of the commonly used variations of it are: “3.14”, “3.1412”,
8
“3.14159”, “3.141593” and “3.1416”. And, if Pi is used as a target value in a process,
9
close approximations for each reached from the use of an arithmetic calculation to
10
11 determine it is considered acceptable. Remember, there are no rules, and how variations

12 of math constants are used in an application are up to, or determined by, the “User”.

13 33. Keeping in mind the information from Paragraph 32, which is going to be used to
14
evaluate the “3.458,229” vote total the State of Pennsylvania certified for Biden/Harris on
15
11/24/2020; and the “3,459,923” Pennsylvania vote total the Associated Press (AP)
16
reported for Biden/Harris as of 12/31/2020; the calculations below show and support how
17
18 the mathematical constant Pi, and its inverse value (1/n), had a key role in its structure, or

19 formation, which cannot be ignored or dismissed as a coincidence or a conspiracy theory.

20 NOTE: The Plaintiff believes the (Pi+(1/Pi)) logic below may be a variation of Tau, (2Pi), which when
21 divided from a 360 degree of a circle equals 1 radian, (360/(3.1416*2)) = 57.296.
22
(3.459923-(1/3.1416)) = 3.1416 , is equal to one of the commonly referred to values for "Pi", 3.1416.
23
, is a 14 vote difference from the 3,459,923 votes the Associated Press
(3.1416+(1/3.1416)) = 3.459909 reported Biden/Harris received in Pennsylvania, as of 12/31/2020.
24
25 (3.458229-(1/3.142)) = 3.1400 , is equal to one of the commonly referred to values for "Pi", 3.14.
, is a -40 vote difference from the 3,458,229 votes the State of
26 (3.14+(1/3.142)) = 3.458269 Pennsylvania certified for Biden/Harris on 11/24/2020.

27 (3.458229-(1/3.14)) = 3.140 , is equal to one of the commonly referred to values for "Pi", 3.14.
, is a -243 vote difference from the 3,458,229 votes the State of
28 (3.14+(1/3.14)) = 3.458471 Pennsylvania certified for Biden/Harris on 11/24/2020.

- 12 -
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 13 of 26

1 34. The series below, where the 2nd & 4th use values from Paragraph-14, support the ones

2 listed in Paragraph 33. NOTE: “10” is a dummy value representing 100% of value, “1.618” is the commonly

referred to value for the Golden Ratio, “360” represents a Circle, and “2” is a divisional value representing ½ value.
3
(1/(3.459923-3.1416)) = 3.14146 , is within range of the math constant
4
((360/((3.458229+3.377674)*(10-1.61803399)))/2) = 3.14145 "Pi", which is likely to be a target variable.
5 (360/(2/(3.459923-3.1416))) = 57.298 , is about equal to 1 Radian, which is
6 ((3.458229+3.377674)*(10-1.61803399)) = 57.298 commonly referred to as "57.3".

7 35. The calculations below continue to show how geometrical math constants
8
interconnect with the number of votes the Associated Press reported Biden/Harris
9
received in Pennsylvania (PA), as of 12/31/2020, which, as of 1/8/2021, hasn’t changed.
10
(((3.459923*3.1412)/(3.60/(3.1416*2)))^2) = 360 , is equal to the "360" degrees of a Circle.
11
, is a 12 vote difference from the 3,459,923 votes
12 (((3.6/(3.1416*2))*SQRT(360))/3.142) = 3.459925 the AP says was casted for Biden/Harris in the PA.
(((3.6/(3.1416*2))*SQRT(360))/3.459923) = 3.1420 , is equal to Pi, commonly referred to as "3.1412".
13
(3.459923/(SQRT(360)/3.142)) = 0.57296 , is equal to 1 Radian, (3.60/(3.1416*2)) = 0.57296.
14
36. Math constants used in “Rating” and “Investing” circles, like the “Fibonacci 618”
15
16 investing value, “e”, 2.718, and the AMBest Rating Agency’s 2008 (the Year of our

17 Financial Crisis) “industry composite leverage factor”, 1.6, also connect to the values the
18 Associated Press reported for Biden as of 12/31/2020, and Trump’s 232 Electoral votes.
19
- 3.2362, is 2x's the inverse of the "Fibonacci 618" investing value, ((1/0.618)*2) = 3.2362.
20 - 3,459,923, is now the number of votes the AP says was casted for Biden/Harris in the State of PA.

21 - 81,283,485, is the number of votes the AP says was casted for Biden/Harris nationwide, 12/31/21.
- 232, is the number of Electoral Votes Trump won in our 2020 Presidential Election.
22
- 360, is the number of degrees of a Circle.
23
(0.81283485/((SQRT(0.232)/(0.3459923/0.360))^2)) = 3.2363 , a difference of 1.
24 (((1/0.618)*2)*((SQRT(0.232)/(0.3459923/0.360))^2)) = 0.81283358 , a difference of 127.
25 ((SQRT(((1/0.618)*2)/0.81283485)*SQRT(0.232))*0.360) = 0.3459920 , a difference of 3.

26 (0.3459923/(SQRT(((1/0.618)*2)/0.81283485)*SQRT(0.232))) = 0.360 , no difference.

((SQRT(0.81283485/((1/0.618)*2))*(0.3459923/0.360))^2) = 0.232 , no difference.
27
SQRT(SQRT((0.618*2)/0.81283495)/SQRT(0.232)) = 1.6 , is AMBest “1.6” industry composite factor.
28 (((3.60/1.61803399)^4)/SQRT(81.283485)) = 2.718 , equates to the math constant e, 2.718.

- 13 -
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 14 of 26

1 Calculations support an alleged claim 600,000 votes were manufactured in PA.

2 37. President Trump’s Attorney, Rudy Giuliani, has a YouTube video series Titled:
3
Rudy’s Common Sense, which contains a video where he alleges “600,000” votes (which
4
in the series of calculations below is represented as “0.600000”) was fabricated in
5
Pennsylvania’s 2020 Election to give Biden/Harris a victory over Trump/Pence.
6
7 The series of calculations below shows how the six minus Pi logic brought to your
8
attention in Paragraph 26 equates to the difference between the “3,459,923” votes the
9
Associated Press says Joe Biden received in the State of Pennsylvania, as of 12/31/2020,
10
and the “600,000” votes Rudy Giuliani alleges was fabricated in Pennsylvania to give the
11
12 Biden/Harris Presidential Ticket the win over Trump/Pence Presidential Ticket.

13
The 1st two calculations below show where the values in the calculations that follow interconnect.
14
(6-3.14) = 2.860000 , the difference between these two calculations is 77 votes.
15 (3.459923-0.600000) = 2.859923

16 , is a difference of 77 votes from the “3,459,923” votes the Associated

((6-3.14)+0.600000) = 3.460000 Press says, as of 12/31/2020, Joe Biden received in Pennsylvania.
17 , is a difference of 77 votes from the “600,000” votes Giuliani says
(3.459923-(6-3.14)) = 0.599923 was fabricated in Pennsylvania to give Biden the victory over Trump.
18
(6-(3.459923-0.600000)) = 3.140077 , which equates to a commonly referred to value for “Pi”, 3.14.
19 ((3.459923-0.600000)+3.14) = 5.999923 , is about equal to the number “6”.

20
38. The next series of calculations show there is merit to the claim outlined in Paragraph 37, as
21
the 600,000 votes alleged to have been manufactured in Pennsylvania to give Biden/Harris a win
22
relates to logic associated with a “Kepler Triangle”. And notice, the third calculation in the
23
series below continues to support decimals were used to hide geometrical math constant
24
associations from the Public’s eye in our 2020 Election, so this scheme could not be recognized.
25
26 (3.378263-(3.459923-0.600000)) = 0.5183 , is numerically the “51.83” degree
((3.378263-(3.459923-0.600000))*100) = 51.83 angle associated with a Kepler triangle.
27 COS(RADIANS((3.378263-(3.459923-0.600000))*100)) = 0.618 , is the Fibonacci 618 investing value.
28 (0.600000-SQRT(3.459923-3.378263)) = 0.3142 , is numerically equal to Pi, 3.142.

- 14 -
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 15 of 26

1 39. The triangle below shows an angle of 51.83° (or 51°50′) with a cosine of 0.618 or Phi, (i.e.

2 DEGREES(ACOS(0.618)) = 51.83). And, if you extend the bottom yellow line of this triangle
towards the right to the green-line, the arc of this particular section of this circle is a radian.
3
NOTE: The picture below was borrowed from Phi and Fibonacci in Kepler and Golden Triangles - The Golden Ratio:
4 Phi, 1.618, May 13, 2012, by Gary Meisner, https://www.goldennumber.net/triangles/

5
6
7
8
9
10 The series of calculations below show how the number of votes, 3,377,674, the State of
11 Pennsylvania certified for Trump/Pence on 11/24/2020 can be derived with an arithmetic

12 calculation of 1 radian less 51.83 degrees multiplied by the Fibonacci 618 investing value,
which continues to support math processes were used to rig our 2020 Election. NOTE: In the
13
calculations below “1” or “10” are commonly used dummy values, or place holders, to represent 100% of value. Also,
14 “51.83” was used in place of DEGREES(ACOS(0.618)) = 51.83 and “Pi” was truncated to save space on the line.
, is equal to what is referred to in financial engineering, as
15
the "Fibonacci 618" investing value. NOTE: Recall info
from Paragraph 19, which shows if you multiply 0.618 by
16 (3.377674/((360/(3.1416*2))-51.83)) = 0.6180 360 degrees, it equates to the Reflex of the Golden Angle.
17 ((3.377674/0.618)+51.83) = 57.295 , is about equal to 1 Radian, (360/(3.1416*2)) = 57.296.
((360/(3.1416*2))-(3.377674/0.618)) = 51.830 , is the “51.83” degree angle related to Kepler’s Triangle.
18
, is a -95 vote difference from the "3,377,674" votes
(((360/(3.1416*2))-51.83)*0.618) = 3.377769 Pennsylvania certified for Trump on 11/24/2020.
19
The next calculation is the same as the one directly above this, only the Pi is rounded to its
20 th
8 digit to match the number of decimal places for the inverse of the Golden Raito, which brings
21 the result of this calculation close, a difference of 255 votes, to the 3,378,263 total vote amount
22 the Associated Press reported for Trump/Pence in the State of Pennsylvania as of 12/31/2020.

23 (((360/(3.14159265*2))-51.83)*0.61803399) = 3.378038 , a 225 vote difference from the "3,378,263".

24 The calculations below show the core logic above also equates to the 3,459,923 total votes the
Associated Press reported Biden/Harris received as of 12/31/2020.
25
(1/((1-0.3459923)^4)) = 5.4660
26 ((360/(3.141593*2))-DEGREES(ACOS(0.618))) = 5.4660

27 (1-SQRT(SQRT(1/((360/(3.141593*2))-DEGREES(ACOS(0.618)))))) = 0.3459928 -5 vote diff.

(SQRT(SQRT(1/((360/(3.141593*2))-DEGREES(ACOS(0.618)))))+0.3459923) = 1
28 SQRT((1-((1-0.3459923)^4))*10) = 2.8584 , is equal to the (Six minus Pi) discussed in Paragraphs 26 and 37.

- 15 -
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 16 of 26

1 There is other evidence out there to support the Plaintiff’s complaint.

2 40. Former federal prosecutor, Attorney Sidney Powell, alleges software processes
3
associated with Dominion Voting Machines, which is the machine the Plaintiff believes
4
he casted his ballot on, was used to rig our 2020 Election to favor Biden/Harris over
5
Trump/Pence, and has the evidence of it to support her claim outlined on her website
6
7 https://www.defendingtherepublic.org, which is sure to support the merits of the

8 Plaintiff’s complaint and should be considered in the Courts consideration of this matter.
9
10 Courts agree, every Citizen’s vote matters and should be protected from dilution.

11 41. Courts believe votes should be “protected from the diluting effect of illegal ballots.”
12
Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368, 380 (1963). The calculations listed in this complaint
13
more than support it is a certainty math of some kind was used to interfere with our 2020
14
Election, especially in the State of Pennsylvania, to not just to dilute it, but to nullify the
15
16 Plaintiff, and all Citizens voice, regardless of who they voted for, for the reason

17 Biden/Harris was always going to win that State and end up with 306 Electoral votes.
18 42. The Plaintiff, and all Citizens, have Constitutional rights to vote in truthful Elections,
19
which in 2020, and likely before, did not happen in Pennsylvania, and Nationwide. “The
20
right to vote is protected in more than the initial allocation of the franchise. Equal
21
22 protection applies as well to the manner of its exercise. Having once granted the right to

23 vote on equal terms, the State may not, by later arbitrary and disparate treatment, value
24 one person’s vote over that of another.” Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98, 104-05 (2000).
25
An obvious legal challenge to this lawsuit, which should be rejected by the Court.
26
27 43. Some may try and contest to this legal action on the basis of no new Election

28 challenges can be brought, for the reason the deadline to do so under the “Safe Harbor”

- 16 -
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 17 of 26

1 provision, U.S. Code (3 U.S.C. §5), has passed, and certifications were provided,

2 however, the Plaintiff asks the Court to grant an extension, or reprieve to this, for the
3
reason when “Safe Harbor” law was written, legislators never conceived citizens would
4
fall victim to an Election fraud scheme involving mail in voting, proprietary automation,
5
software, and mathematically engineered processes based upon obscure math logic.
6
7
Likely legal challenge discussion continued, and a little bit of venting frustrations.
8
Paragraphs 44-47 are DIRECTED TO THE COURT, not the Defendants.
9
10 44. Moreover, and frankly speaking, no person could have recognized this Election fraud

11 scheme under the time allowed to do so set in U.S. Code (3 U.S.C. §5).
12
The only reason why the Plaintiff was able to come across the calculations you
13
reviewed in this complaint, is, he was a victim of a criminal act, done to him here in the
14
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in another litigation,
15
16 which forced him, out of necessity, to spend the last 7-8 Years of his life, 12 to 16 hours

17 a day, non-stop, 7 days a week, in front of a computer analyzing any and all material he
18 could get his hands on, of which some of it was, or maybe considered controversial in
19
nature, but necessary to review in order to learn about and to figure out the obscure math,
20
and or old math logic, a Foreign Financial Holding Company (and MANY other large
21
22 Corporations) was using in their day to day accounting and investing business operations,

23 which governed the way one of their insurance subsidiaries handled and paid out a claim.
24 That analysis uncovered a multi-billion-dollar Accounting and Securities fraud, and
25
so much more, a few Courts, PA-BAR, Senate/House (more so the Democrat HFSC),
26
SEC, FBI, USDOJ and MANY OTHERS are all well aware of, but have turned a blind
27
28 eye to it at the expense, livelihood and well-being of this Plaintiff.

- 17 -
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 18 of 26

1 It was only by chance the Plaintiff was able to recognize the same mathematical

2 logic a Foreign Financial Holding Company used in their day to day business and
3
investing operations, which he found was also being used by many others, like Enron,
4
Lehman Brothers, AmTrust, Goldman Sachs and the late Jeffrey Epstein’s Liquid
5
Funding LTD, to name a few, has now been used by someone to develop processes for an
6
7 Election fraud scheme that robbed the Plaintiff, and all Citizens, of their vote, and the

8 right to have a say and choose who leads us all over the next four years.
9
The analysis listed in this complaint could have only of been recognized by the
10
Plaintiff once he had a good idea of what our nationwide vote total result values would
11
be, which was on 11/28/2020. Then it had to be studied and developed, which also took
12
13 12-16 hours a day, nonstop, since 11/28/2020 through 1/11/2020, to get it to a point

14 where it could be consolidated and presented in a legal filing.

15 And, although you’re not aware of it, the “501171” value hidden under the guise of
16
the untrue records the Plaintiff brought to your attention on Paragraphs 7 & 8 was a
17
connection point, and or target value of some sort, used as the basis to develop the series
18
19 of calculations listed in Paragraph 35 of this complaint, which he recently uncovered will

20 connect with logic listed in Paragraph 39, further supporting the values hidden under the
21 guise of those untrue records are numeric mechanisms of some sort used in these Election
22
Fraud and Financial Fraud schemes, which if a few past Courts, Senate & House (more
23
precisely the Democrat HFSC), PA-BAR, SEC, FBI and USDOJ would of investigated,
24
25 and not ignored when it was brought to their attention, which helped to cover up the

26 crimes committed against the Plaintiff that stole 12 years of his life and robbed him of
27 almost everything he owns, WHOEVER it was who engineered this Election fraud
28

- 18 -
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 19 of 26

1 scheme may have thought twice, or at the very least, it would have made it much harder

2 for them to configure, for the reason a good part of the obscure and old math logic used
3
in it would have been exposed and brought to the Public’s attention.
4
And if the Plaintiff thoughts were not clear enough for you to understand in the
5
preceding paragraph, our Government’s willingness to not investigate and to allow so
6
7 many people, and Companies, to get away with financial fraud over the last 20 or so

8 years is a big part of the reason why someone was able to put together a collection of
9
math processes used to rig the outcome of our 2020 Election. Which, likely, wasn’t the
10
first time, and it will not be the last unless the Court allows this legal action to continue.
11
12 Plaintiff’s Election Fraud Complaint is NOT about President Trump.
13 45. The Plaintiff believes it is important for the Court to know, since mid-2016, he was
14
NO fan of President Trump and was openly critical of a family members suspect business
15
dealings while a part of, and working in his cabinet. The Plaintiff was also critical of
16
many political appointments to Government Agencies which made the swamp 6ft deeper.
17
18 The Plaintiff has also been critical of some, not all, of his foreign and domestic policy

19 decisions (such as corporate tax policy and financial bailouts hidden under the guise of
20
the 2020 CARES-ACT). Plaintiff has also been critical of several of his politically
21
connected pardons (which all Presidents do), and leniency acts to a person convicted for
22
being the worst Traitor, to date, in our Nation’s History, who those in the know say
23
24 seriously damaged our Nation’s defense and intelligence capabilities (which this leniency

25 started out under President Obama), and lastly, he has issue with our President, and the
26
previous two, CRONY appointments to the SEC, FBI and USDOJ for the reason they did
27
nothing but cover the crimes their foreign and domestic special interest crimes were
28

- 19 -
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 20 of 26

1 committing against regular-folk, like the Plaintiff, so don’t even go there. The Plaintiff is

2 no zealous supporter of our current President, nor the last three.

3
Moreover, it is the Plaintiff’s personal belief, if an honest evidenced based event
4
leads to an honestly conducted investigation, and shows President Trump committed a
5
crime, he, just like ALL of our other Political Leaders and their family members, or
6
7 associates thereof, should be held accountable. No one’s above the law, that’s what use

8 to make our Country stand out from others, which as of right now, is no longer the case.
9
46. However, with the comments in Paragraphs 44 & 45 being said, Plaintiff cannot turn
10
a blind eye to what occurred in our 2020 Presidential Election, and neither should you.
11
THIS LAWSUIT IS NOT ABOUT TRMUP. This lawsuit is about ELECTON FRAUD,
12
13 and if it goes unpunished, this won’t be the end of it, it will happen again. And frankly

14 speaking, it has happened before in the last few Democratic Primaries, and surely in other
15 Local, State and Federal Elections which cannot be allowed to continue, and why a RICO
16
action is needed for a Citizen to investigate and prosecute the merits of this claim.
17
18
Possible, but unwarranted pushback.
19
47. Finally, Political Leaders, Pundits, even some in the Media, when they hear of this
20
21 lawsuit will try to dismiss it or smear this complaint as a conspiracy theory, and or try to

22 humiliate the Plaintiff by falsely portraying him as a conspiracy theorist, which he is not.
23 And some in Authority may claim he is a mean person for the reason he dares to stand his
24
ground and tell them he will, and is prepared to, defend himself (in nonviolent, but
25
disruptive ways) for their collective cover-up, and or ignoring, easily provable crimes
26
27 committed against him, which this complaint doesn’t even begin to detail, which again,

28 stole 12 years of his life and robbed him of almost everything he had, causing him many

- 20 -
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 21 of 26

1 hardships that continue until this very day, just to BULLY him so our Government can

2 continue to protect their Foreign and Domestic Special interests at his expense, livelihood
3
and wellbeing, too which these unwarranted pressure tactics, frankly speaking, show
4
GUILT, too which Mark Twain said it best, “Figures don’t lie, but liars figure”.
5
Election fraud happened, in Pennsylvania and Nationwide, and we, as a Country,
6
7 need to address it NOW! And no longer dismiss it, for the reason unlike the politically

8 connected and billionaire class that popped up out of no-where over the last 20-25 years,
9
even in the aftermath of a financial crises that only seemed to affect us ordinary-folk,
10
Elections have real and serious consequences for us regular-folk, which is the reason why
11
we need to have a say as to who leads us, which won’t happen unless those who rigged
12
13 our 2020 Election, using math processes, machines and other methods are held to account.

14
IV. CAUSES OF ACTION
15
16 FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

17 Election Fraud, Vote Rigging, and Depriving a Common Citizen of their Vote.
18
48. The Plaintiff reiterates averments from Paragraphs 1-43 listed in this legal filing.
19
49. This complaint shows malfeasance in Pennsylvania Elections by Officials, many of
20
which are unknown at this time, who acting “under color of law,” diluted valid ballots
21
22 with invalid ones (a form of “ballot box stuffing”), rendering a false vote tabulation in

23 favor of Biden/Harris, and likely others, which prevented valid voter registrations votes
24
from being given effect in all measures listed on the November 3, 2020 ballot, (18 U.S.C.
25
§§ 241, 242), where federal candidates were on the ballot (52 U.S.C. §§ 10307, 20511).
26
50. Moreover, polls in Pennsylvania were improper, and or purposely manipulated or
27
28 flipped to give a false impression Biden/Harris had a comfy lead in the State, which was

- 21 -
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 22 of 26

1 an attempt to prevent or impede qualified voters from participating in the November 3rd,

2 2020 Election where a federal candidate’s name was on the ballot, which provided cover
3
to commit fraud by giving the Public a false impression, so no one would question the
4
outcome and notice 600,000 ballots were added to dilute the vote, (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242).
5
6 SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
7 High Treason, Sedition, and subversive activities.
8
51. The Plaintiff reiterates averments from Paragraphs 1-43 listed in this legal filing, and
9
asks the Court to provide time to allow him to identify all those who took part in this
10
11 scheme, so they could be added to this complaint under (18 U.S. Code CHAPTER 115-

12 TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES).

13
14
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
15
16 Conspiracy and Fraud in Violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
17 Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. (sec) 1962, and Request for Treble Damages.
18
52. The Plaintiff reiterates averments from Paragraphs 1-43 listed in this legal filing.
19
53. A group of yet to be identified Individuals, Organizations, Corporations, and Foreign
20
21 and or Domestic Governments or Agencies thereof, which include the Defendants,

22 engaged in a thus far successful conspiracy to defraud the Plaintiff, and the American
23 Public, of their vote by collectively agreeing to, and or concealing actions, processes,
24
equipment and methods used to rig our 2020 Election Processes to a degree that is not yet
25
known, which nullified all votes and effects the current state of affairs in our Country,
26
27 and the future livelihoods and wellbeing of the Public at large, in particular, the Plaintiff.

28

- 22 -
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 23 of 26

1 54. As a result of this collective action to defraud the public using the Election Process,

2 Plaintiff, and all Citizens not involved in this conspiracy have suffered, or will suffer
3
from various types of injuries. Treble damages are therefore appropriate under RICO to
4
punish the conspiratorial nature of Defendants’, and any others who participated in this
5
Election Fraud Scheme, which was well planned out to conceal a hidden agenda.
6
7
8
FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
9
Civil action for deprivation of rights (Bivens/1983).
10
11 55. The Plaintiff reiterates averments from Paragraphs 1-43 listed in this legal filing.

12 56. Pennsylvania Secretary of State, KATHY BOOCKVAR, and other yet to be

13
identified Federal, State and Local Agents/Officers/Officials while acting under color of
14
state or federal law, (42 U.S.C. § 1983), rigged the outcome of Pennsylvania’s 2020
15
Presidential Election in favor one Candidate, Biden/Harris, which deprived Plaintiff of
16
17 his Constitutional Rights to cast a vote for President, and other offices, in a fair and

18 honestly conducted Election held on November 3, 2020, Bivens v. Six Unknown Named
19 Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
20
57. Moreover, a Federal and Local Discovery Courts, local L&I Official, PA-BAR
21
Disciplinary Board, SEC, FBI, USDOJ, even some members of our Senate and House (in
22
23 particular the Democratic HFSC), who were made aware of the crimes committed against

24 the Plaintiff, and the untrue records at issue discussed in Paragraphs 7, 8, and 44, which
25 are now associated to this complaint, either purposely ignored, or claimed no crime was
26
committed against the Plaintiff regarding events pertaining to those records, which if it is
27
found that any of those mentioned are tied to this Election fraud scheme, in any way, the
28

- 23 -
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 24 of 26

1 Plaintiff asks they too should be added to this complaint, or the Bivens/1983 part of this

2 complaint.
3
Punitive Damages
4
58. The conduct of Defendants described above is outrageous. Defendants’ conduct
5
demonstrates a reckless disregard for governance, and human life. The acts and omissions
6
7 described above were willful and performed with actual or implied malice. Punitive and

8 exemplary damages are therefore appropriate and should be imposed in this instance.
9
V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
10
11 WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully pray for a judgment against Defendants for:

12 1. Permission to immediately Subpoena details about a set of untrue building

13 appraisal records, to further support the merits of this complaint touched upon in
14
Paragraph 7, 8, and 44, which also corrects an injustice suffered here in the US
15
Eastern District Court, forced upon him, then ignored by many parts of Government.
16
2. An order, waving the deadline for this Election Fraud complaint to be heard past
17
18 the deadline set under the “Safe Harbor” provision, U.S. Code (3 U.S.C. §5).

19 3. An order, declaration, and/or injunction overturning all of vote certifications for

20
the results of the 2020 General Election in the State of Pennsylvania, and in other
21
swing States where Election Fraud occurred.
22
4. An order, declaration, and/or injunction canceling or suspending the result of
23
24 January 6, 2021 Joint Session of our Congresses Count of Electoral Votes.

25 5. An order, allowing plaintiff time to amend this complaint to include others who
26
are identified in partaking in the illegal acts, or abuses, associated with CAUSES OF
27
ACTION 1 through 4.
28

- 24 -
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 25 of 26

1 6. Any other affirmative relief the Court may deem necessary and proper.

2 7. Injunctive and equitable relief as the Court deems appropriate including:

3
a. Punitive damages as the court deems appropriate;
4
b. Costs and attorney fees of this lawsuit, with interest;
5
c. Any other relief as the court deems appropriate.
6
7
8
Dated: January 12, 2021 /s/ Ercole A Mirarchi, Pro se
9
1625 W. Ritner Street
10 Philadelphia, PA 19145

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

- 25 -
 Case 5:21-cv-00126-JLS Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 26 of 26

1 VERIFICATION
2
3
4 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that I have reviewed the

5 foregoing Complaint and that the factual allegations are true and correct.
6
7
8
Date: January 12, 2021 /s/ Ercole A. Mirarchi
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

- 26 -