ATTI

De_Sign

a cura di Giulia Pellegri

Environment Landscape City
a cura di Giulia Pellegri

Giulia Pellegri, è professore associato di Disegno presso il Dipartimento Architettura

2019
e Design dAD e Vice Preside della Scuola Politecnica di Ingegneria e Architettura
dell’Università degli Studi di Genova.

La V Giornata Internazionale di Studi sul Disegno, De-Sign Environment Landscape

City, che si svolge presso il Dipartimento Architettura e Design della Scuola Politecnica
di Ingegneria e Architettura dell’Università degli Studi di Genova, pone al centro del
dibattito nazionale e internazionale il ruolo del disegno nelle diverse “anime “ dei settori
scientifico disciplinari che conivolgono tutti gli aspetti progettuali dell’ambiente.
Al fine di coinvolgere studiosi, ricercatori, studenti e professionisti delle diverse aree di
ricerca, le tematiche introducono le seguenti linee di ricerca: Rilievo e Rappresentazione
dell’Architettura e dell’Ambiente; Il Disegno per il paesaggio; Di-segni per il Progetto:
tracce - visioni e pre-visioni; I margini i segni della memoria e la città in progress;

Atti _V Giornata Internazionale di Studi sul Disegno

Cultura visiva e comunicazione dall’ idea al progetto; Le emergenze architettoniche; Il
colore e l’ambiente; Percezione e identità territoriale; Patrimonio iconografico culturale
paesaggistico: arte, letteratura e ricadute progettuali; Segni e Disegni per il Design e

De-Sign Environment Landscape City 2019

Rappresentazione avanzata.
Nell’ambito della V Giornata di Studi, interviene Chris Bangle, designer statunitense di
fama mondiale con la Lectio Magistralis “Designer Notebook”.

ISBN 978-88-94943-83-2
UNIVERSITY
GENOVA
PRESS

RICERCA
RICERCA
De-Sign Environment Landscape City/Di-Segnare Ambiente Paesaggio Città
International Drawing Study Day/Giornata Internazionale di Studi
Genoa May 28, 2019 /Genova, 28 Maggio 2019
Department Architecture and Design DAD/Dipartimento Architettura e Design DAD
Polytecnich School of Genoa/Scuola Politecnica dell’Università degli Studi di Genova

Scientific Director/Direttore Scientifico

Giulia Pellegri, Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento DAD

Organizing Committee/Comitato Organizzatore

Sara Eriche, Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento DAD
Marina Jiménez Jiménez, Universidad de Valladolid, ETS Arquitectura
Michela Mazzucchelli, Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento DAD
Giulia Pellegri, Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento DAD
Francesca Salvetti, Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento DAD
Michela Scaglione, Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento DAD

Scientific Committee/ Comitato Scientifico

Marta Alonso, Universidad de Valladolid, ETS Arquitectura
Chris Bangle, Designer
Gianandrea Barreca, Architetto Studio professionale Barreca & La Varra
Enrica Bistagnino, Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento DAD
Paolo Clini, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Edile e Architettura, DICEA
Raffaella Fagnoni, Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento DAD
Maria Linda Falcidieno, Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento DAD
Patrizia Falzone, Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento DAD
Massimiliano Fuksas
Marco Gaiani, Alma Master Studiorum Università di Bologna, Dipartimento di Architettura
Noelia Galván Desvaux, Universidad de Valladolid, ETS Arquitectura
Manuel Gausa, Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento DAD
Adriana Ghersi, Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento DAD
Marco Giovine, Università di Genova, Dipartimento di Scienze della terra, dell’ambiente e della vita DISTAV
Marina Jiménez Jiménez, Universidad de Valladolid, ETS Arquitectura
Adriano Magliocco, Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento DAD
Michela Mazzucchelli, Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento DAD
Giampiero Mele, Università degli Studi eCampus
Giulia Pellegri, Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento DAD
Franco Purini, Professore Emerito, Università La Sapienza Roma
Maria Elisabetta Ruggiero,Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento DAD
Francesca Salvetti, Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento DAD
Michela Scaglione, Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento DAD
Maria Benedetta Spadolini, Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento DAD
Antonio Tordesillas, Universidad de Valladolid, ETS Arquitectura

Segreteria organizzativa/Local organizing office

Sara Eriche, Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento DAD
tel. 010.2095570 Email. giornatadistudi@arch.unige.it

Patronage/Patrocinio
Università degli Studi di Genova, Scuola Politecnica di Genova, Dipartimento Architettura e Design; ADDgenova Dottorato in Architettura e Design;
Patrocinio dell’Unione Italiana per il Disegno, Universidad de Valladolid, ETS Arquitectura; Comune di Genova; Ordine degli Architetti Paesaggisti
Conservatori e Pianificatori della Provincia di Genova, OAPPC, Fondazione dell’Ordine degli Architetti; Comune di Strevi; Associazione Italiana
Architettura del Paesaggio, AIAPP, Valle d’Aosta and Piemonte; Boero; A.I.T.I.V.A Associazione Italiana Tecnici Industrie Vernici ed Affini; Cts_
colorLabCts_culture technology science_Laboratory of Colour, Instrumetrix
 De- Sign
Environment Landscape City_ 2019
a cura di

Giulia Pellegri
è il marchio editoriale dell’Università degli Studi di Genova

De-Sign Environment Landscape City

International Drawing Study Day
Genova, 28 Maggio 2019
Dipartimento Architettura e Design DAD, Scuola Politecnica dell’Università degli Studi di Genova

Questo volume contiene contributi sottoposti a blind peer review per la Giornata Internazionale di Studi De-Sign Environment
Landscape City, tenuta presso il Dipartimento Architettura e Design dell’Università di Genova

Patrocinio:

AITIVA
Associazione Italiana
Tecnici Industrie Vernici ed Affini

Impaginazione grafica a cura di: Sara Eriche

In copertina:
Progetto colore Dipartimento dAD - cts_colorLAB

© 2019 GUP

Gli autori rimangono a disposizione per gli eventuali diritti sulle immagini pubblicate.
I diritti d’autore verranno tutelati a norma di legge.

Riproduzione vietata, tutti i diritti riservati dalla legge sul diritto d’autore

Realizzazione Editoriale
GENOVA UNIVERSITY PRESS
Piazza della Nunziata, 6 - 16124 Genova
Tel. 010 20951558
Fax 010 20951552
e-mail: ce-press@liste.unige.it
e-mail: labgup@arch.unige.it
http://gup.unige.it

ISBN 978-88-94943-83-2 (versione eBook)

Finito di stampare Novembre 2019

Stampato presso il
Centro Stampa
Università degli Studi di Genova - Via Balbi 5, 16126 Genova
e-mail: centrostampa@unige.it
De-Sign Environment Landscape City_ 2019

CONTENTS/CONTENUTI

8 Introduction - Barbara Grosso

T1. Survey and Representation of Architecture and Environment

T1. Rilievo e Rappresentazione dell’Architettura e dell’Ambiente

8 DIGITAL SURVEY: THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING AND REPRESENTATION OF A VESSEL

S. Eriche, G. Zappia

23 SIGNS PRESENT OF A LOST PAST. MEDIEVAL BRIDGES IN THE TERRITORY OF

GARFAGNANA, LUCCA. MEMORY OF A HERITAGE TO BE RECOVERED
S. La Placa, M. Ricciarini

35 INTERDISCIPLINARY SKILLS IN THE FIELD OF ARCHITECTURAL SURVEYING

L. Nardini, G. Pellegri, F. Salvetti

T2. Drawing for the Landscape

T2. Disegno per il Paesaggio

45 THE FIFTH LANDSCAPE

F. Bianconi, M. Filippucci, D. Repetto

59 CROSSLANDS: RESILIENCE AND NEW METROPOLITAN POLARITIES IN THE PERIURBAN

RIVER SPACES OF THE MEDITERRANEAN COAST. THE CASE OF VAL POLCEVERA
N. Canessa, M.Gausa, M. Pitanti

69 ON ART AND LANDSCAPE: CONNECTIONS AND MEANINGS BETWEEN THE

REPRESENTATION AND THE PROJECT OF THE GREEN
M. Scaglione

79 THE DRAWING AND THE DIMENSION OF PROTECTED AGRICULTURE INTO THE

MEDITERRANEAN LANDSCAPE
G. Tucci

T3. The drawings for the project: tracks visions and previsions
T3. I Disegni per il progetto: tracce–visioni e pre–visioni

89 INCOMPLETE AND MARGINAL CONSIDERATIONS ON CURRENT ASPECTS OF DRAWING IN

ARCHITECTURE
F. Purini

97 TWENTY4YOU COMPUTATIONAL LAB: FROM IDEA TO PROJECT

S. Bernardini, F. Bianconi, M. Filippucci, A. Rondi

105 COMMUNITY DESIGN. THE CASE OF “POLO UNICO OSPEDALIERO” IN PERUGIA

F. Bianconi, M. Filippucci, M. Meschini

117 PROLEGOMENA OF A DISCIPLINE THAT WILL BECOME SCIENCE: THE DESIGN OF A SHIP
IN THE RENAISSANCE
M. Corradi, C. Tacchella

5
 De-Sign Environment Landscape City_ 2019

T4. Margins: the signs of memory and the city in progress

T4. Margini: i segni della memoria e della città in progress

A DISUSED FUNICULAR RAILWAY IN THE URBAN LANDSCAPE 135

G. Antuono, M.L. Papa

MAPS OF STRATEGICAL, PHYSICAL, SOCIAL (AND EMOTIONAL) GEOGRAPHIES 145

N. Canessa, M. Gausa, F. Vercellino

T5. Visual Culture and Communication: from idea to project

T5. Cultura visiva e Comunicazione: dall’idea al progetto

GEO-GRAPHICA. THE VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF URBAN IDENTITY EVOLUTION: MAPS 153

AND VISUAL ARTEFACTS AS HISTORICAL KNOWLEDGE MACHINES
L. Bollini

A DESIGNER IN DISNEY 165

L. Chimenz, M.E. Ruggiero

T6. Architectural Features

T6. Emergenze architettoniche
177
DRAWING THE FUNCTION
G.Galli

T7. The colour and the environment

T7. Il colore e l’ambiente

STONE GENOESE AND RENAISSANCE GATES: COLOURS AND TEXTURES. 189

A PROPOSAL FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCHES
G.Brancucci, M. Spesso

PROCEDURAL APPLICATIONS OF CHROMATIC VALUES IN NORMATIVE MATTERS: THE 201

VILLAGE OF ZUCCARELLO
S. Eriche, F. Salvetti

TERRITORY AND ENVIRONMENT OF THE GENOESE BEFORE THE DEVELOPMENT OF 211

GENOA OUTSIDE THE HISTORICAL WALLS, IN THE PAINTINGS, IN THE WATERCOLOURS,
IN THE DRAWINGS, IN THE PRINTS AND IN THE DRAWINGS
P. Falzone

THE “CHROMATIC GARDEN” IN THE PARK DE GERLAND, IN LYON (FRANCE) 231

A. Ghersi

T8. Perception and territorial identity

T8. Percezione e identità territoriale
243
FOOD IN LANDSCAPE DESIGN
F. Bianconi, E. Bettollini, M. Filippucci

THE GREEN SPACE PROTAGONIST OF THE CONTEMPORARY CITY 255

P. Burlando, S. Grillo

WAYFINDING IN TERRITORIAL COMMUNICATION: APPLICATIONS FOR CIOCIARIA 267

A. Caldarone, T. Empler, A. Fusinetti

A LOGO FOR LA PIGNA 279

M. Canepa, A. Magliocco

6
De-Sign Environment Landscape City_ 2019

T9. lconographic Cultural and Landscape Heritage: art, literature and design effects
T9. Patrimonio iconografico – culturale – paesaggistico: arte, letteratura e ricadute progettuali

287 CONSERVATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF MONUMENTAL AND LOCAL AND HERITAGE,

MATTER AND DESIGN
G. Franco, D. Pittaluga

T10. Signs and Drawings for Design

T10. Segni e disegni per il design

299 THE CITY INSIDE THE SHIP: NEW FORMAL CONFIGURATIONS IN THE ORGANIZATION OF
SPACE ON BOARD
E. Carassale

319 ABOUT DRAWING FOR DESIGN

M. B. Spadolini

T11. Advanced Representation

T11. Rappresentazione avanzata

329 REDRAWING VALPOLCEVERA. THE MORANDI BRIDGE AND THE VALLEY AS A COMPLEX
PROJECT OF URBAN REGENERATION
L. Mandraccio, B. Moretti, D. Servente

339 STRATEGIES TO VISUALIZE THE CHANGE

G. Tagliasco

7
 G. Antuono, L. M. Papa

An abandoned ropeway in the urban landscape

Giuseppe Antuono
DICEA, University of Naples Federico II,
mail: giuseppe.antuono@unina
Lia Maria Papa,
DICEA, University of Naples Federico II,
mail: lmpapa@unina.it

Abstract

Urban transformations are linked to networks that develop in several half-spaces, from aerial
half-spaces to underground half-spaces. Ropeways belong to the former group; they enhance the
perceptive element and an unusual, bird’s-eye view of the city.
This contribution reinterprets the functional and perceptive features of a ropeway built in Naples
in 1937 and abandoned in 1961. It used to connect the hill of Posillipo – the natural border of the
old city to the west – to the new twentieth-century neighbourhoods, especially the exhibition centre
called Mostra d’Otremare built during the fascist period by some of the most important protagonists
of twentieth-century architecture, including Luigi Piccinato and Carlo Cocchia.
This study carefully reinterpreted available documentation, especially drawings and photographs,
and compared past and present maps of the urban context to analyse the contemporary importance
of the ropeway, bearing in mind that current international thinking considers this infrastructure type
as a valid support to the accessibility and enhancement of the landscape features of urban space.

Abstract

Le trasformazioni urbane sono legate ad una rete di collegamenti che si sviluppano in vari semispazi,
da quello aereo a quello in sottosuolo. Tra i primi possono essere annoverate le funivie, che esaltano
la componente percettiva ed una visione inusuale, dall’alto, della città.
Il contributo proposto vuole rileggere le connotazioni funzionali e percettive che assumerebbe oggi
una funivia realizzata a Napoli a partire dal 1937, e dismessa dal 1961. Essa collegava la collina di
Posillipo, che rappresentava un naturale limite della città antica verso occidente, ai nuovi quartieri di
espansione novecentesca e, in particolare, al polo espositivo della Mostra d’Oltremare, realizzato nel
periodo fascista, e nel quale operarono alcuni tra i maggiori protagonisti della cultura architettonica
del Novecento, tra cui Luigi Piccinato e Carlo Cocchia.
Attraverso una attenta rilettura della documentazione reperita, soprattutto grafica e fotografica, e dal
confronto cartografico tra il contesto urbano dell’epoca con quello attuale, si è voluto analizzare il
significato contemporaneo della funivia, guardando ad uno scenario internazionale che vede in tale
tipologia di infrastrutture di collegamento, un valido supporto all’accessibilità e alla valorizzazione
delle qualità paesaggistiche dello spazio urbano.

135
 G. Antuono, L. M. Papa

Introduction
Contemporary cities frequently contain the remains of old works and infrastructures that have
become an integral part of the contemporary urban built; they include not only ancient artefacts, but
also complex nineteenth-century works that influenced and inputted into the construction of the city.
Ropeways are just one example1. In the past urban ropeways were a strong iconic element in many
cities, especially the ones built on hills; they were a valid additional means of transportation when
surface accessibility between urban areas was limited.
In the early decades of the twentieth century even the city of Naples, with its unique morphology,
had several structures which, thanks to the use of different building techniques, made it possible to
connect its hillside areas with the plains next to the sea shore.
One of these structures was designed to provide a direct link between the urban area that had
developed on the Posillipo hill, the natural border of the old city to the west, and the new twentieth-
century neighbourhoods in the westernmost part of the urban plain.
Very little remains of this complex system built in the late thirties and deeply embedded between
the close-knit buildings in the city, however the imposing pylons of the ropeway are still present and
tower perceptively above the urban fabric (Fig. 1).

Fig.1 The ropeway between the Fuorigrotta neighbourhood and the hill of Posillipo.
1
Ropeways are collective transport systems; the cabins are suspended on one or more high resistance iron ropes running between two stations
and resting on intermediate pylons. They differ from funicular railways which are transport systems on a fixed rope; energy is supplied by an
electric engine located in a station on the ground and transmitted through the high resistance cable to which the cabins are attached.

136
De-Sign Environment Landscape City_ 2019

This study carefully reinterpreted available documentation, especially drawings and photographs,
and compared maps of the urban context, then and now, to analyse the contemporary importance of
the ropeway, bearing in mind that current international thinking considers this infrastructure type as
a valid support to the accessibility and enhancement of the landscape features of urban space.

The ropeway in Posillipo: origins and evolution

In the early decades of the twentieth century extensive urban expansion was undertaken in the
western part of the Neapolitan city; this included housing, a new road network and a public transport
system, all part of an ambitious modernisation and construction project aimed at turning Naples into
a “city of the future”.
The plan was part of the policies and strategies of the fascist regime that had chosen the Phlegraean
valley as the ideal site for the Mostra triennale delle terre italiane d’Oltremare, a new, innovative,
and functional exposition centre where it wished to celebrate its colonial expansion in Africa.
Naples, in the centre of the Mediterranean, was not a random choice: in fact, it was the perfect place
to display artefacts of the various ethnic groups controlled by the regime.
A ropeway was designed to connect the exhibition area to Posillipo, the natural hilly border between
the two parts of the city, i.e., between the old layout and the new expansion area. This transport
mode was the most suitable option because it could cross the higher ground of the hill of Posillipo
in just six minutes, thereby boosting the area as a tourist attraction and enhancing the city’s charm,
especially in the new exposition area.
The ropeway, designed in 1938 by the architect Giulio De Luca and built by the Ceretti and Tanafani
company (Milan), was inaugurated in 1940.
It stretched for 1629 m between the lower station in Viale Kennedy and the upper station located in
Via Manzoni close to the big park area known as Parco Virgiliano (Fig. 2-3). The almost horizontal
layout of the rest of the Expo area then extended upwards towards the hillside (a 104 m difference
in level). Each of the two cabins could carry 20 passengers.

Fig.2 The ropeway, seen from the hill towards the valley (left), and near Viale Kennedy, from the Cumana railway (right).

137
 G. Antuono, L. M. Papa

Fig.3 Left, plan of the ground floor and section of the lower station along Viale Kennedy (Source: Archive of the Mostra
D’Oltremare di Napoli, 195); right, the lower station in an old photo.

Newspapers enthusiastically announced the launch of the ropeway: “The cabins of the ropeway are
similar to an aerial belvedere: as they rise the panorama opens up in all its wondrous breadth and
reveals horizons undetectable from any other location”.
The war broke out approximately one month after the ropeway opened; as a result, it was prudently
deactivated. In 1943 German bombs destroyed most of the ropeway. Restructured in the fifties, it was
permanently closed in 1961 after the concerns of local inhabitants regarding the three-dimensional
space occupied by the ropeway.
Today the characteristic shape of two of the three reinforced concrete pylons supporting the aerial
cables and cabins still stand like a reinforced concrete giants with open, outstretched arms; they
tower over the urban fabric which has gradually witnessed an increase in its densification.
The albeit deteriorated lower station is now used as a garden centre while the upper station has been
completely abandoned (Fig. 4-5).

A different perception and fruition of urban space

Although the surviving elements are important material remains of the original ropeway, they
certainly do not help to fully understand its design. Above all, the pylons are widely considered as
invasive and foreign to the site and its history (Fig. 6).
Only a careful documentary study made it possible to retrace and understand the social and functional

138
De-Sign Environment Landscape City_ 2019

importance of the ropeway during its construction and use, its relationship with the immediate natural
and anthropic elements, and its overall strategic and functional design, especially the orientation and
direction of the ropeway in light of the morphology of the hill.
The study has made it possible to not only substantiate and stimulate a cultural debate about the
important role played by the abandoned parts, but also, bearing in mind the international scenario,
evaluate the ropeway as a sustainable infrastructure that can be used to access and enhance the
landscape features of this urban space.
In fact, ropeways provide a panoramic view of the urban landscape and its features, modernising the
form of perception that was so widespread in eighteenth-century representations (Fig. 7-8).

Fig.4 Modern map compared to the 1942 map (Public Deeds of 21 April, XX. N. 11119 Vol. 521, Fol. 69) showing what
remains of the original ropeway.

139
 G. Antuono, L. M. Papa

Fig. 5 A series of images of the abandoned ropeway. Top left, the two stations, lower and upper, with the equipment and an
old cabin; below, exterior and interior of the upper station. Right, the upper part of one of the impressive pylons.

Fig. 6 Left, elevation of one of the pylons (Source: Archive of the Mostra D’Oltremare, 1940); right, view of the second pillar
located inside the densely populated fabric and the Cavalleggeri d’Aosta district.

140
De-Sign Environment Landscape City_ 2019

Fig.7 Patrick Vale is the author of this complex illustration entitled Empire State of Pen, using the Empire State Building as
his viewpoint.

Fig.8 A View of the Bay of Naples, Looking Southwest from the Pizzofalcone towards Capo di Posillipo, Giovan Battista
Lusieri, 1791, Paul Getty Museum.

141
 G. Antuono, L. M. Papa

Their descriptive goal was based on establishing viewpoints from which an observer could enjoy the
broadest but static visual field in which to merge the natural and cultural elements of the landscape.
Over the years several proposals to reactivate the ropeway have been launched; however they have
come to nothing despite the fact it could be a tourist attraction if it was reactivated, and not to
mention the significant contribution it could make to mobility between the hillside area and the
Phlegraean neighbourhood2 where rail links are currently elements of discontinuity in the urban
fabric. In fact, although the surface infrastructure networks in the western plain of the city play an
increasingly important role, they often appear severed from the inhabited areas and contexts; they
appear to be more functional but have less formal and expressive importance (Fig. 9). The fact the
city has grown up around these linear works has de facto created empty spaces between the networks
and the more or less aligned façades of the buildings.
The morphogenesis of these marginal areas is therefore linked to the “non-project” while the concept
behind their formation is based on separateness and the self-referentiality of the “infrastructure –
corridors” that create them.
These considerations, backed by analyses and graphic prefigurations, can spark a process of
revitalisation or workable proposals regarding an alternative route for the ropeway, in practice
a project that would stimulate the degraded areas and enhance perception which, thanks to its
height, would be considered as an interpretative category and imaginative tool for description and
dissemination3.

Fig.9 Graphic of the altimetric route of the ropeway (Source: Archive of the Mostra D’Oltremare, 1952) with images of
today’s “moving panorama”.

2
To mitigate concern that the route and pylons are too close to the buildings it is possible to use modern technologies and materials to protect
the corridor under the tramway. A. Capasso (a cura di), Trasporto verticale e città. Gli impianti di risalita nella mobilità urbana. Dagli ascensori
alle funivie, CLEAN Edizioni, Napoli, 2001.
3
In an interesting essay Barbara Rocchetti focuses on the perception of the universe by citizens, associated with a search for dynamism, for a
vivifying link between past and future which in the aerial perspective cited by the Russian writer Lermontov manages to reconcile the elements
of the artificial and natural universe provided by the city-world. Cfr. B. Rocchetti., Uno sguardo dall’alto sulla città: Lermontov e la verticalità,
da http://www.europaorientalis.it/uploads/files/ Ronchetti.pdf

142
De-Sign Environment Landscape City_ 2019

Conclusion
More and more interest is being shown regarding ropeways as viable projects in the vast panorama of
urban mobility interventions; they represent a sustainable mobility system and are cheaper compared
to the much more expensive underground options, especially in stratified historical contexts.
One example is the ropeway in Berlin stretching between two neighbourhoods in former East Berlin.
With an intermediate station at the top of the hill, it is linked to the city’s subway system allowing
passengers (in 65 cabins and with a capacity of 3000 people an hour) to reach the city centre. Another
example is the Montjuїc ropeway in Barcelona, inaugurated in 1928 for the Universal Exposition; it
connects the city to the Montjuїc hill and from the latter to the port area thanks to another ropeway.
The one in Bogotà (Columbia) has a chiefly tourist vocation; it stretches between the city and the top
of the Monserrate Hill, 3,152 m above sea level (Fig. 10).
In Italy, very few many similar systems are present in urban areas, and yet there are places where this
alternative “aerial” transport system would be perfect4.

Fig.10 Top left, the ropeways in Barcelona; top right, the ropeways in Berlin; below the ropeways in Bogotà.

After Giulio De Luca’s project for the ropeway in Posillipo, another interesting proposal was submitted in the 1950s by the architect Luigi
4

Mattioni, founder of the Società Italiana Metropolitane Aeree (S.I.M.A.).

143
 G. Antuono, L. M. Papa

One of the most unique aspects of aerial transportation is undoubtedly its tourist value, especially
the possibility to visit an urban complex that may not be as accessible when using other transport
modes or provide a “moving panorama”. In fact, the multiple viewpoints offered by a ropeway, i.e.,
in one direction, presents a sequential panorama of roads, squares, buildings and monuments that
can be enjoyed in a different way and with a diverse level of detail, depending on the distance and
lighting conditions, when doubling back along the same route; this is even more visible when the
ropeway – such as the one described here – connects a hilly area with a plain located close to the sea.
Last but not least, ropeways enhance access to places that are not easy to reach using other means
of transportation; they endorse the dual component inherent in the concept of urban accessibility:
active accessibility5 and passive accessibility. The term passive or spatial accessibility means
the ability to allow all individuals full access to places and resources and free circulation; instead
active accessibility involves enhancing the physical and psychological wellbeing of citizens and
the possibility to enjoy material and immaterial assets. In the words of the philosopher George
Santayana, it means enjoying beauty as a means to elicit pleasure, emotions and wellbeing, but
above all knowledge created by signs, images, symbols and forms that everyone can use in their own
way to find a reflection of something that belongs to them6.

The contribution was developed, in equal measure, by the authors L.M.Papa and G. Antuono.

References
A. Capasso (a cura di), Trasporto verticale e città. Gli impianti di risalita nella mobilità urbana. Dagli ascensori alle funivie,
CLEAN Edizioni, Napoli, 2001.
U. Siola, La Mostra d’Oltremare e Fuorigrotta, Electa Napoli, Napoli, 1990.
F. Stocchetti, La Triennale d’Oltremare, in “Le vie d’Italia”, Touring Club Italiano, Milano, 1938, a. XLIV, 7, pp. 832-836.
G. C. Alisio, A. Buccaro, Napoli Millenovecento. Dai catasti del XIX secolo ad oggi: la città, il suburbio, le presenze
architettoniche, Electa Napoli, Napoli, 2000.
B. Rocchetti, Uno sguardo dall’alto sulla città: Lermontov e la verticalità, da:https://www.researchgate.net
/profile/Barbara_Ronchetti/publication/292436979_
R. De Rubertis, M. Clemente, Percezione e comunicazione visiva dell’architettura, Officina edizioni Roma, 2001.
K. Lynch, The Image of the City/L’immagine della città, Marsilio Editore, 1964.
R. Secchi, La strada tra piano e progetto, in R. Secchi (a cura di), “Future G.R.A”, Prospettive edizioni, Roma, 2010, pp.
124-157.
M. Merlau-Pointy, Fenomenologia della percezione (ed.originale: Phenomenologie de la perception, 1965), Il Saggiatore,
Milano, 1980.
S. Maffioletti, S. Rocchetto (a cura di), Infrastrutture e paesaggi contemporanei, in “Quaderni Iuav”, il Poligrafo, Padova,
2002.
G. Santayana, Il senso della Bellezza, ediz. italiana a cura di Giuseppe Patella, Aesthetica Edizioni, Palermo, 1997.

5
Cfr. R. De Rubertis, M.Clemente, Percezione e comunicazione visiva dell’architettura, Officina edizioni, Roma, 2001.

6
Cfr. G. Santayana, Il senso della Bellezza, Italian edition by Giuseppe Patella, Aesthetica Edizioni, Palermo, 1997, pp. 208.

144