Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Also:
Dominion involved in election matters in my view should be and be seen to be
independent/impartial. Yet, when I was watching a REBEL NEWS video it appears that the
owners of a 5.000 square building was promoted to have been created in 2004 as to cut down on
cost of businesses so they can share equipment. Nothing ordinary may be anything to this was it
not that Dominion and leftist organisation connected to George Soros appear to be fellow tenants
and so sharing their equipment. Now, I wonder how on earth can Dominion share its equipment
with any leftist organisation or anyone at all when it is to be and remain to be impartial? How
much access then do they (fellow tenants) have to any computer facilities of Dominion I wonder.
I understand that Dominion (Dominion Voting Systems) had an issue that Smarmatic is
somehow not connected, but Raheem Kassan in “Smartmatic Reporting” appears to me to show
that Smartmatic has in fact a connection. https://www.citizenfreepress.com/column-2/raheem-
kassam-sets-the-record-straight-on-dominion-and-smartmatic/
Raheem Kassam sets the record straight on Dominion and Smartmatic relationship…
Posted by Kane on December 23, 2020 1:43 pm
For more Pacific Coast news, check our home page at PressCalifornia.com
Gnews.org, an independent news source in Asia, has posted a flurry of Biden-related
stories on Tuesday. Many include disturbing videos and images from the vault of the
CCP’s honeypot files, showing Hunter Biden in various stages of debauchery in China
while on trips with his father Joe.
Others relate to secret financial deals that Gnews claims were designed to line the pockets
of Hunter Biden and his associates and family, at the expense of U.S. national interests.
Here is perhaps the most explosive of them, posted at https://gnews.org/461051/, which we
are including as a screen shot as the Gnews site has been under constant attack.
END QUOTE
And then the question might be how could the then Vice President Joe Biden have a POWER
OF ATTORNEY granting someone to exercise his powers he is permitted by law? Did this
means that the Attorney could exercise the powers of the Vice President also?
https://www.project13d.com/default.html
Re voter fraud-Project13d-0_0_0_28_0_01_250_326_csupload_71105551
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-fact-check-biden-voter-protection-not-idUSKBN27E2VH
QUOTE
The clip shared by Trump, McEnany and others starts around the 19:13 mark, when Biden
tells Pfeiffer and Lovett, “Secondly, we’re in a situation where we have put together—and
you guys did it for President Obama’s administration before this—we have put together I
think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American
politics.”
END QUOTE
While it might be claimed this was a slip of the tong. Nevertheless it may have been a slip of the
tong only to have unintendedly revealed that election fraud was a big issue.
Hence, no need to get out but remain in the basement if election officials were to have been
bribed that no matter what Joe Biden would win the election by hook or by crook.
It is to my understanding often stated that if a judge very strangely dismisses a case then you may
not have to look much further but to check if he had suddenly any property paid off buy some
generous donation. Perhaps this also may apply to others in a decision making position?
https://www.project13d.com/default.html
QUOTE (Red colouring, bolding and underlining added)
JOE BIDEN ALLEGED FRAUD USED
It seems to me that someone paying of nearly $2 million surely may be worth checking if this
really was over the years or suddenly a windfall payout?
I for one do not allege that you were paying off Ms J Benson as I merely quote the above stated.
However, could it be that she was perhaps paid off by someone else, or whatever? Not that I seek
to imply that Ms J Benson was corrupt or received inappropriately any monies but in all fairness
I view that as she was listed it should be checked out also.
Perhaps the IRS may check out if those who paid off their loans, etc, did so from their earnings
or that they were assisted (perhaps inappropriately) to pay it off in return for certain services?
(Quit Pro Quo?)
We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.