Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
The lower the stomatal density of a flowering plant (of a particular species), the lower the
rate of transpiration.
AIM
1) To investigate the stomatal density and distribution in three plants of different
species
2) To determine the rate of the transpiration rate in each of the three flowering plants
METHOD
Procedure 1: For investigation of the stomatal density
1) Collect a sample (shoot) of three different plant species, assigning each plant
species a letter (A to C). Each sample must have a reasonable number of leaves,
and length of stem.
2) Remove one leaf from each plant. Leaves should be of roughly the same surface
area.
3) Coat a portion of the leaf with nail varnish
4) Completely cover the leaf with paper tape
5) Remove the tape that is attached to nail varnish
6) Examine the nail varnished portion of the leaf, and count the number of stomata
in this area
7) Measure and record the area and number stomata noted.
8) Repeat steps 5-7 with the lower epidermis of each leaf.
VARIABLES:
Independent: Species of flowering plant used: Each species will have its own normal
stomatal density and distribution.
EXPECTED RESULTS:
It is expected that the plant species with the highest stomatal density will have higher
rates of transpiration.
TREATMENT OF DATA:
Plant Species Stomatal Density (per cm2) Water Level in Column per
unit time (cm/min)
Plant species A P X
Plant species B Q Y
Plant species C R Z
LIMITATIONS:
The method does not test the rate of transpiration directly, but rather looks at a rate
produced by the disappearance of one product.
SOURCES OF ERROR:
Random error may have occurred during timing, causing minor discrepancies thus not
making the time intervals exactly consistent.
Parallax error may have occurred whilst reading the measurements of the distances that
oil travelled up the tube.
CONCLUSION:
If it is found that increasing stomatal density correlates positively with the water level in
the column per unit time (indicative of the respiration rate), then it can be said that the
hypothesis is proven true. Otherwise, it is null and void.