Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
It was given as a class assignment in my third year of university to do a creative piece outlining
the attributes of a perfect community. Being as I am, I thought, can there be a perfect
community? and if so, a perfect community to whom?
A great place to grow
By Aneisha Samuels
It was given as a class assignment in my third year of university to do a creative piece outlining
the attributes of a perfect community. Being as I am, I thought, can there be a perfect
community? Moreover, if so, A perfect community to whom? I have decided to write an article
common location. The word is often used to refer to a group that is organized around common
values and is attributed with social cohesion within a shared geographical location, generally in
social units larger than a household. Based on my knowledge and experience I would consider a
perfect community to be one with all its elements living together harmoniously: today, tomorrow
and forever. A perfect community would denote a situation where there is a harmonious and
symbiotic relationship between the natural and the built environment, humans being the sole
implicator. With this in mind concepts such as sustainable development, carrying capacity and
limits would come under the microscope. As a planner you cannot think of the perfect
community as a single place. But an ideal global situation. I was tempted to start by saying the
perfect community would be a flat, fertile, well drained area that……, but I had to rethink….. a
1. A perfect community is one where there is sustainable growth and development. Sustainable
development is a pattern of resource use that aims to meet human needs while preserving
the environment so that these needs can be met not only in the present, but also for generations to
come. The term was used by the Brundtland Commission, which coined what has become the
most often-quoted definition of sustainable development as development that "meets the needs of
the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." this
is where economic social and environmental needs are met sustainably. All definitions of
sustainable development require that we see the world as a system—a system that connects
space; and a system that connects time. When you think of the world as a system over space, you
grow to understand that air pollution from North America affects air quality in Asia, and that
pesticides sprayed in Argentina could harm fish stocks off the coast of Australia. And when you
think of the world as a system over time, you start to realize that the decisions our grandparents
made about how to farm the land continue to affect agricultural practice today; and the economic
policies we endorse today will have an impact on urban poverty when our children are adults.
We also understand that quality of life is a system, too. It's good to be physically healthy, but
what if you are poor and don't have access to education? It's good to have a secure income, but
what if the air in your part of the world is unclean? And it's good to have freedom of religious
expression, but what if you can't feed your family? The concept of sustainable development is
rooted is this sort of systems thinking. It helps us understand ourselves and our world. The
problems we face are complex and serious—and we can't address them in the same way we
2. There must be governance. Public participation is the key to sustainable governance. Can we
plan for them? Or make practical laws for them? No….we cannot see the victim as being them
instead we are the victims. We need to plan for us. People within the community will send in
ideas for rules then later vote on the ones they like. The final say being in the hand of a
body..........not individual political parties, but a team of people representing the people and the
law. I disagree with the privatisation of public services like electrification, water and health.
They are public services and thus should be government owned and thus non profit.
3. In a perfect community there must be population control mechanisms. Whether to increase the
population or measures to minimise or maintain a steady growth. The determining factor being
the threshold limit of that region, taking into consideration its carrying capacity and its limits
both its functional and its geographical limits. Lets look at the Malthusian theory and the idea of
the predicament that will arise if population continues to grows exponentially (2,4,8.16)while
growth rate in accordance with the carrying capacity of that community. To allow for harmony,
4. The location, layout and function of the community must be synonymous with nature as certain
landscapes and soil types facilitate different man-made developments and infrastructure. Like
you would not expect to build a wharf in the centre of a country as this would hinder transport
and this is the main function of a wharf. Depending on the function required suitable location
5. In a perfect community there must be education and employment to suit the needs of the
population. Our education system is gym, religion, wood working, math, music, science. All
subjects are important. No one being stigmatised and no one being ignored or walked upon.
6. We must maintain our external links in this the perfect community. These external links are
7. There must be a reliable medium for transport preferably public transport, since it would result in
less traffic congesting, less air pollution, and a reduction in the fuel usage.
8. Having good role model and working together is another aspect of the perfect community. One
in which people talk…..not about each other harmfully…but with each other about pleasant
things, entertainment governance and possible new developments. Community centres and areas
for free expression and down time are attributes of a perfect community. There must be religion,
whether it’sv real or just a myth people need a higher being to believe in, someone to answer the
unanswerable.
So the question is can there be a perfect community? Alternatively, is this just an unrealistic
ideal? As planners it is somewhat our duty to work towards this ideal, but no man is an island no
man stand alone so we all need to work together to make our world a wonderful place to grow.
References
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainable_development
www.buzzle.com/.../thomas-malthus-theory-of-population.html
www.gdrc.org/uem/footprints/carrying-capacity.html