20201208-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

ISSUE –
Politicians risking the lives and wellbeing of Australians

As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the constitution.

* Gerrit, when will Australians act against those politicians risking their lives and wellbeing?
**#** INSPECTOR-RIKATI®, that is a question each and every Australian ought to consider.
As has been made clear that the PCR test to detect a person to be positive or negative actually
was never even at the time subjected to a pear review. It was allegedly published within 24 hours
and then the WHO (World Health Organization) simply took it as the golden rule. And, then
dictated it to the world at large. And, politicians of all different countries being interested to
implement the New World Order simply went along with this scientific skews crap. Now, in my
view no medical practitioner/scientist could be trusted who used or other applied this PCR test
merely because the WHO dictated it.

https://uncoverdc.com/2020/12/03/ten-fatal-errors-scientists-attack-paper-that-established-global-pcr-driven-
lockdown/
Then Fatal Errors: Scientists Attack Paper That Established Global PCR Driven Lockdown
QUOTE
War has broken out in the scientific literature that strikes at the existential core of Covid-19 and its proposed
causative virus.
At the heart of the controversy lies the fact that the creators of the most commonly used test, the RT-PCR,
published instructions for how to test for SARS-CoV-2 “without having virus material available,” in their
own words, relying instead on the Chinese scientists’ genetic sequence published on the internet.
The paper “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time PCR” was published 24 hours
after it was submitted to Eurosurveillance, clearly evading peer review. Its lead authors were Christian
Drosten and Victor Corman, which is how it took on the title “Corman-Drosten paper.” It provided the
“recipe,” or work flow for the Covid-19 diagnostic test, quickly applied all over the world, after it was
accepted as the standard of testing by the WHO.
German scientist Christian Drosten was also a co-discoverer of the SARS-associated coronavirus, and
developed a test for it in 2003. Drosten, who heads the Charite Institute of Virology in Berlin, and a team of
fellow scientists in Europe and Hong Kong, moved very quickly, as soon as cases of the illness were being
reported out of Wuhan in December of 2019. They submitted the paper on Jan. 21, it was published
in Eurosurveillance on Jan. 23,* and was immediately accepted as the standard of testing internationally, by
the WHO, which began sending test kits to affected regions. (Fact check: was it 24 hours? Corbett says yes.)
END QUOTE

What we now have we are in a way rules by scientist and doctors and not by elected politicians.
Those scientist/doctors have not a clue about what is constitutionally permissible or couldn’t care
less and the politicians are but too happy to have the scientist/doctors rule the roost while
implementing the New World Order.
https://principia-scientific.com/bill-gates-admits-covid-vaccine-changes-dna-now-doctors-rebel/
Bill Gates Admits COVID Vaccine Changes DNA, Now Doctors Rebel!
Bill Gates himself has, as I understand it, admitted that the COVID-19 vaccination is to change a
persons DNA. As such, the real purpose is to change all peoples DNA, and not at all to fight
some COVID-19 disease.
p1 8-12-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
Hansard 22-4-1897 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE

Mr. BARTON: At first I thought it would be necessary to have some provision of this sort, but now I think
it is unnecessary. In the clause it is prescribed that [start page 1183] an elector "shall have only one vote"; as
to the Senate and as to the House of Representatives I intend to move, on the recommittal of the clause, that
the matter shall be turned into a direct prohibition; that is, that "no elector shall vote more than once." A
breach will be a Statutory misdemeanor, and the offender can be punished, this being an Imperial Statute, in
the same way as he would be for a breach of any other Imperial Statute applying to the colonies, such as the
merchant shipping laws. Lest there should be any doubt in connection with the giving of a vote, when there is
a distinct law against it, there is a passage in Russell on "Crimes," which the legal members of the
Convention will be satisfied with. It is in the fifth edition, page 192:

Where an offence is not so at common law, but made an offence by Act of Parliament, an indictment
will lie where there is a substantive prohibitory clause in such Statute, though there be afterward a
particular provision and a particular remedy given. Thus, an unqualified person may be indicted for
acting as an attorney contrary to the 6 and 7 Vict., c. 73, a. 2, although sec. 35 and sec. 36 enact that in
case any person shall so act he shall be incapable of recovering his fees, and such offence shall be
deemed a contempt of court, and punishable accordingly.

That is to say, although the Statute provides a distinct means of punishment, yet if by the disregard of the
prohibition a misdemeanor is committed, a court can convict the offender of that misdemeanor and may fine
or imprison him. The passage continues:

And it is stated as an established principle that when a new offence is created by an Act of Parliament
and a penalty is annexed to it by a separate and substantive clause, it is not necessary for the
prosecutor to sue for the penalty, but he may proceed on the prior clause on the ground of its being a
misdemeanor; and wherever a Statute forbids the doing of a thing, the doing of it wilfully, although
without any corrupt motive, is indictable.

END QUOTE

Hansard 22-4-1897 Constitution Convention Debates

QUOTE
Mr. BARTON:
Mr. ISAACS: I suppose you propose to put in words to make it a misdemeanor.
Mr. BARTON: If necessary; but where the statute expressly forbids it is a misdemeanor without further
words.
Dr. QUICK: Without any corrupt motive is it indictable?
Mr. BARTON: Although there may be no corruption in the doing of the act, if it is done intentionally it
is indictable.
END QUOTE

Sorell v Smith (1925) Lord Dunedin in the House of Lords

QUOTE
In an action against a set person in combination, a conspiracy to injure, followed by actual injury, will
give good cause for action, and motive or instant where the act itself is not illegal is of the essence of the
conspiracy.”
END QUOTE

HANSARD 8-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

QUOTE
Mr. HIGGINS.-I did not say that it took place under this clause, and the honorable member is quite right in
saying that it took place under the next clause; but I am trying to point out that laws would be valid if
they had one motive, while they would be invalid if they had another motive.
END QUOTE

HANSARD 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

QUOTE

p2 8-12-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 Mr. BARTON.- The position with regard to this Constitution is that it has no legislative power, except
that which is actually given to it in express terms or which is necessary or incidental to a power given.
END QUOTE

It should be clear that in my view the “No Jab, No Pay” was outside the Commonwealth of
Australia legislative powers.
While PM Scott Morrison was making clear that he would pursue compulsory vaccination and I
understand Alan Joyce of Qantas made clear people would be required to have a vaccination
clearance to be able to use the airlines, to me that is unconstitutional. After all no government or
private corporation can insist on self-harm.

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/immunisation-experts-are-divided-on-whether-covid-19-vaccine-is-
safe/ar-BB1bBVjT?ocid=msedgdhp
Immunisation experts are divided on whether Covid-19 vaccine is safe

https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/stay-of-action-filed-against-fda-to-stop-approval-of-covid-vaccine-for-
using-faulty-pcr-tests-in-trials/
“Stay of Action” Filed Against FDA to STOP Approval of COVID Vaccine for Using
Faulty PCR Tests in Trials

https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-12-04-court-rules-covid19-tests-worthless-media-rejects-
science.html

Court rules Covid-19 tests worthless,

media rejects science
http://www.medianet.com.au/releases/193548/
A Sensible and Compassionate Anti-COVID Strategy. Jay ...
4 Nov 2020 ... A Sensible and Compassionate Anti-COVID Strategy. ... on October 9,
2020, in Omaha, Nebraska, at a Hillsdale College Free Market Forum.
COVID-19 | 04/11/2020 5:21:32 PM Stanford University. Jay Bhattacharya

https://www.activistpost.com/2020/06/problem-reaction-solution-how-covid-19-leads-to-global-
governance-complete-control.html
The Great Reset Plan Revealed: How COVID Ushers In The New World Order

In my view consider also the Nuremburg Trail issues and the convention that no human
experiences may be permitted without the true consent of a person (As I previous wrote about)
then I view every politicians as well as other government official, scientist and health
professional who participate in this deliberate self-harm should be facing the full force of the
law. Likewise so any private company that demands self-harm must be pursued to every extent to
be held legally liable.

https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=159726
Florida Dept of Health now requires all its labs to report PCR cycle threshold
values.THIS SHOULD COLLAPSE THE CASE-DEMIC NARRATIVE

https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=159744
QUOTE
COVID 19 drug Remdesivir and the coincidental connection between - George Soros, Bill &
Melinda Gates, and the WHO (World Gilead Sciences and UNITAID, Hillary, Dr. Fauci and

p3 8-12-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 Posted By: Namaste Date: Sunday, 6-Dec-2020 03:54:39
www.rumormill.news/159744
A Coincidence?????
Well, well! Isn’t this interesting.
A drug called Remdesivir, manufactured by Gilead Sciences, is now being reported as the
ultimate “CURE” for COVID-19.
But it gets interesting.
The patent for Remdesivir is currently held by China, through an agreement with Gilead’s
drug patent sharing subsidiary, called UNITAID. UNITAID just happens to have an office
near Wuhan, China.
Can you guess who some major financial investors in UNITAID might be?
You don't know?
Well, how about none other than George Soros, Bill & Melinda Gates, and the WHO
(World Health Organization).
I know what you’re thinking! Just coincidence!
Well, here’s another coincidence. Both Gilead Sciences and UNITAID were financial
backers of Hillary Clinton in the last election.
And another coincidence. Dr. Fauci authorized millions of American dollars to be sent to
The Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, specifically for the study of Coronaviruses.
Oh, did I mention that Dr. Fauci’s wife works for Gilead Sciences?
What do you think?
Just coincidences! Nothing to see here folks, just keep moving.
It’s no wonder Dr. Fauci slapped down hydroxychloroquine, which is inexpensive, has
been around for over 60 years with a proven safety record, even though its success
rate was very favorable. Why? Because he was told to!! And the news media backed him
up all the way.
It’s amazing what you find when you just follow the money.
Here’s a link to the full, very thorough report.
Do you detect political considerations? Just a coincidence!
https:// civilianintelligencenetwork. ca/2020/02/12/george-soros- bill-gates-partner-with-
china- on-coronavirus-drug/
Make sure you share this.
END QUOTE

I understand from articles published on the internet that China is collecting DNA details/records
of people around the world.
I actually mentioned this for some time. So, when Chairman Dan pursues compulsory PCR
testing and those go as I understand it laboratories connected with the CCP (China’s Communist
party) then that means likely that every persons who has been tested has his/her DNA records
passed on to the CCP.
* What would be the use of CCP having a persons DNA details?
**#** Well, if someone was to adversely comment about CCP then they could track down
family members and use them to put pressure upon such a person to retract any adverse comment
and or to “voluntarily” submit himself/herself to the CCP for “re-education”, etc.
* What authority does Chairman Dan have to demand CPCR testing in the first place?
**#** As far as I am concerned he has none. In my view it violates the provisions of the
Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth). And as I previous wrote about the can use the swab to not just detect
your DNA but also to effectively inset any kind of vaccine at the same time. In this regard
“vaccine” is not just one with a needle but can be specs of items, that can infiltrate your body and
causes a change to your DNA, etc.
p4 8-12-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
It is obvious that the medical professions and the scientist much went along with this COVID-19
scam as they were making huge amounts of monies with it. After all the same with other scams
of the past. But let us not claim all scientist/medical professionals are crooks as around the world
more and more of them are speaking out, this even so they often end up losing their jobs and so
their income, etc. Let us not justify the silence of any one but neither condone anyone to remain
silence where they should expose the truth.

https://dl-mail.ymail.com/ws/download/mailboxes/@.id==VjN-
2k2Q8ZYuCzEYXGSMDuzmYJ1vK0Vn4rtkypvIPc_0fWQcQQSF0eKLT-
5h8cfE8wIRFMeF1HxEby4RyM1B0GqTyhh-
J5C6LyUnkpuuSevalNc/messages/@.id==AE6tXoY0EJloX83J6gCE0NgEvJ0/content/parts/@.id==2/raw?a
ppid=YMailNorrin&ymreqid=766adcc1-0ec8-23e2-1c2d-
5e005301c900&token=zitEzqOML3j84e6ealFTT5U7-
km5qEQF52lp7AcCuBYI_W9zKEAbV3rFjTrfGikLsmsIOqKh7qDJnwZseryfI6NyCT6PYI4q40WZx8ExFV
zyoH_F-XXnZ0TtxTQrGyca
This is an automatic downloading of EYES WIDE SHUT.
Fiona Barnett-Re paedophilia/child abuse issues

I understand that she names Australian Prime Ministers and many others involved. And
well as long as we conceal this (Consider former Senator Bill Heffernan exposing names in
the Parliament but subject to a secrecy order) you may get the picture that politicians are
covering up for paedophilia, etc. And as I wrote previously about the CCP has allegedly untold
records of politicians and others around the world that compromised those persons, like Hunter
Biden. And as we have witnessed in the USA Google reportedly paid $400 million to pervert the
USA Presidential election allegedly also to pay off judges. It appears that the judges of the
Pennsylvania Supreme Court violates the State constitution to get rid of President Donald J
Trump to be re-elected but the matter is now before Alito J of SCOTUS. In my view, to what I
know of him, Alito J is an honourable judge, who consider that the constitution cannot be
violated merely upon the wimps of politicians or even judges.
* Something else. Didn’t you make submissions regarding the mass murder of the passengers in
MH17
**#** Actually my submissions related to what I deemed some of the technical details that
were misrepresented about MH17. Also that in my view the Dutch Safety Board that is
prohibited by law to make any allegations as to who might be responsible somehow I view acted
in violation and presented a conclusion that was not born out at all by its own “evidence” but
merely speculation and again in violation of the relevant legislative provisions. For example it
claimed there was no other BUK in the area. It simply “assumed” this. Besides was it a BUK at
all? Even its own created cartoon of bringing down of MH17 I held didn’t seem to be accurate.
What I understand eventuated was that an area occupied by the Ukraine forces and later vacated
was somehow attributed to be all along against the resistance. Obviously if it was a BUK and the
area was at the time controlled by the Ukraine forces then it having the BUK for decades would
be responsible. However, the Netherlands allegedly heavily involved in supporting Ukraine at the
time seemed to be more interested to blame the Russians then Ukraine. This may underline how
politicians cannot give a darn about the lives of those who ended up being killed. From my
understanding the bringing down of a civil airliner was all along on the books by the Ukraine
Government to hype up against Russia. I may not have been specifically MH17 but any civil
airliner was apparently all right for their pre-planned mass-murder. I have seen documentation
that appears to underline that the mass murder of the people aboard MH17 was planned ahead.
In my view Australian politicians were not at all interested in holding the culprits accountable
but rather wanted to pursue their mantra against the Russians.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-01/mh17-turnabout-ukraines-guilt-now-proven

p5 8-12-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 MH17 Turnabout: Ukraine's Guilt Now Proven

* You were born in The Netherlands, weren’t you?

**#** Indeed, I was. I served also in the Royal Dutch Armed forces and so in NATO at the then
so called IRON CURTAIN. This also enables me to read the Dutch language. While the report
was published in both Dutch and English language I for one read up some other reports also as to
get some idea what the function of this safety commission was. It clearly was NOT to assign any
blame to a State actor but to consider safety issues. This however I view it violated in to pretend
that the alleged BUK was in an area outside the control of the Ukraine army. And, from other
videos and articles it appears that the bringing down of MH17 actually may have been by a
fighter plane, and this originally was what I understood the Russian detailed explanation was
about that a Ukraine Airforce fighter plane had been near MH17, whereas this was at the time
denied, despite that images appeared to show a plane nearby.
*.Do you vuew that the Australian Government let down the victims of MH17?
**#** Absolutely. It appears to me, it was more interested in playing a political game against the
Russians then to open-mindedly pursue the real culprits of this mass-murder. We just cannot trust
politicians who rather pursue their rhetoric of war mongering then pursuing the truth. Actually,
when it came to North Korea we saw the eagerness to want to go to war whereas President
Donald J Trump in his own manner totally defused the tensions.
*. Do you think that President Donald J Trump still could be re-elected?
**#** Considering the provisions of the U.S.A. constitution that an election shall be held on the
first Tuesday following the first Monday in November, which was November, 2002 then I view
all those dumped ballots after November are unconstitutional and cannot be counted and
President Donald J Trump on November 2020 was validly deemed re-elected considering the
way votes were then counted, subject to the further legal process required to be followed.
I view that Alito J may likely make such kind of a ruling as to invalidate any ballot that were post
November 2020. And this being a SCOTUS ruling to be a deferral ruling than this also may wipe
out other States certifications. Et us not ignore they (Nevada/Arizona) discovered a old school
bus loaded with ballot papers and voting machines in a dessert. One has to ask how many more
might have been located in other area’s to make fraudulent ballots and entries? Any election that
is fraudulent is null and void for the party engaging in such an elaborate fraud.
Ex dolo malo non oritur action. Out of fraud no action arises. Cowper, 343; Broom's Max. 349
Fraus est celare fraudem. It is a fraud to conceal a fraud. 1 Vern. 270.
Fraus et jus numquam cohabitant. Fraud and justice never agree together. Wing. 680.
http://familyguardian.tax-
tactics.com/Subjects/LawAndGovt/ChallJurisdiction/AuthoritiesArticle/AuthOnJurisdiction.htm
QUOTE
37 Am Jur 2d at section 8 states, in part: "Fraud vitiates every transaction and all contracts. Indeed, the
principle is often stated, in broad and sweeping language, that fraud destroys the validity of everything into
which it enters, and that it vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments."
END QUOTE
Even if Joe Biden manages to be sworn in as President, it be a nullity when any court finds it was
due to fraudulent conduct. (Consider Australian parliamentarians having been ousted by HCA)
We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.

Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® (Our name is our motto!)
p6 8-12-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati