0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
11 visualizzazioni1 pagina
The rubric outlines 5 categories to evaluate essays for a Contemporary World type activity. Each category has descriptors for performance at excellent, very good, fair, and poor levels. The categories are: introduction, focus on topic, support for topic, conclusion, and cohesiveness/grammar. An excellent essay would have a clear engaging introduction and conclusion, a well-supported main topic, relevant details, and no grammatical errors. A poor essay would lack organization, have an unclear topic, irrelevant details, and multiple grammar issues.
The rubric outlines 5 categories to evaluate essays for a Contemporary World type activity. Each category has descriptors for performance at excellent, very good, fair, and poor levels. The categories are: introduction, focus on topic, support for topic, conclusion, and cohesiveness/grammar. An excellent essay would have a clear engaging introduction and conclusion, a well-supported main topic, relevant details, and no grammatical errors. A poor essay would lack organization, have an unclear topic, irrelevant details, and multiple grammar issues.
The rubric outlines 5 categories to evaluate essays for a Contemporary World type activity. Each category has descriptors for performance at excellent, very good, fair, and poor levels. The categories are: introduction, focus on topic, support for topic, conclusion, and cohesiveness/grammar. An excellent essay would have a clear engaging introduction and conclusion, a well-supported main topic, relevant details, and no grammatical errors. A poor essay would lack organization, have an unclear topic, irrelevant details, and multiple grammar issues.
Rubric for Essay Writing Type Activity (The Contemporary World)
Revised: Nov. 18, 2020
Category Excellent (4pts) V. Good (3pts) Fair (2pts) Poor (1pt)
The introduction clearly states The introduction states the main The introduction is inviting, the main topic & position and topic & position but does not There is no clear introduction of states the main topic & position previews the structure of the adequately preview the structure the main topic, position, or A. Introduction and previews the structure of the paper, but it is not particularly of the paper nor is it particularly structure of the paper. There is (Organization) paper. It explicitly connects with inviting to the reader. There is a inviting to the reader. It does not no connection with the class the class discussion. loose connection with the class connect with the class discussion. discussion. discussion. There is one clear, well-focused Main idea is clear, but the Main idea is somewhat clear but The main idea is not clear. topic. Main idea stands out and B. Focus on Topic (Content) is supported by detailed supporting information is there is a need for more There is a seemingly random general. supporting information. collection of information. information. Supporting details and Supporting details and Relevant and important details information are relevant and information are relevant and Supporting details and give the reader important C. Support for Topic (Content) information that goes beyond important, but one key issue or important, but several key or information are typically unclear portion of the topic is portions of the topic are or not related to the topic. the obvious or predictable. unsupported. unsupported. The conclusion is strong and The conclusion is recognizable The conclusion is recognizable leaves the reader with a feeling There is no clear conclusion. D. Conclusion (Organization) that they understand what the and ties up almost all the loose but does not tie up several loose The paper just ends. ends. ends. writer is “getting at.” Only a few of the ideas are All ideas are incoherently E. Cohesiveness of the All ideas are cohesively & Most of the ideas are cohesively cohesively & coherently written. written. The composition in is composition and Coherence coherently written. The writer & coherently written. The writer The writer makes 3-4 errors in incohesive. The writer makes makes no errors in grammar, makes 1-2 errors in grammar, of Ideas, Grammar, Spelling, spelling or mechanics of the spelling or mechanics of the grammar, spelling or mechanics more than 4 errors in grammar, and mechanics of the English of the English language that spelling or mechanics of the English language that distract English language that distract language (Conventions) distract the reader from the English language that distract the reader from the content. the reader from the content. content. the reader from the content.