Sei sulla pagina 1di 53

Traffic Impact Analysis

for the

STARBUCKS STORE

Located at

9900 BALBOA BOULEVARD

Submitted to

CITY OF LOS ANGELES

January 2017

Submitted By
January 5, 2017

Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.


Transportation Engineering Associate II
Development Services
6262 Van Nuys Boulevard, 3rd Floor
Van Nuys, California 91401

RE: Proposed Starbucks: 9900 Balboa Boulevard, City of Los Angeles

Dear Mr. Aitchison:

This traffic impact analysis has been prepared in accordance with City of Los Angeles Department of
Transportation’s (LADOT) “Traffic Study Policies and Procedures” (TSPP) dated August 2014. The
proposed Starbucks restaurant is located at the northeast corner of the Balboa Boulevard and Lassen
Street intersection in the Northridge area of the City of Los Angeles.

The preparation process for this study included development of a memorandum of understanding (MOU)
with LADOT, ongoing work with LADOT staff, and our professional evaluations of traffic factors pertinent to
the study area. The analysis is based on traffic data collected, information provided by Starbucks/their
representatives, comments from LADOT, review of the study area, and use of pertinent reference
materials. Overall, this report presents evaluations of potential traffic impacts (and/or absence of impacts).
Figure 1 shows the general vicinity of the proposed Starbucks.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The proposed 2,240 square foot (sf) Starbucks restaurant with drive-through would include demolition of an
existing and currently occupied medical-dental use building. Figure 2 shows the site plan for the proposed
Starbucks. The site will have access at both Balboa Boulevard and Lassen Street based on the existing
striping for the adjacent roadways, and 23 parking spaces are planned to be provided. For purposes of this
analysis, it was assumed that the Starbucks would be occupied in 2017.

EXISTING CONDITIONS

STUDY ROADWAYS AND TRAFFIC VOLUMES

Based upon input from LADOT staff during the MOU process, six study intersections were determined as
critical locations that required analysis: Balboa Boulevard at Lassen Street, Balboa Boulevard at Mayall
Street, Balboa Boulevard at Superior Street-Citronia Street, Balboa Boulevard at Devonshire Street, Louise
Avenue at Lassen Street, and Hayvenhurst Avenue at Lassen Street.

211 Imperial Highway, Suite 208, Fullerton, CA 92835


(714) 992-2990 FAX (714) 992-2883 E-Mail: aga@albertgrover.com
Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.
January 5, 2017
Page 2
Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.
January 5, 2017
Page 3
Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.
January 5, 2017
Page 4

Balboa Boulevard has a general north-south alignment with the northerly terminus at Foothill Boulevard
after a loop of the roadway, while to the south it ends at Ventura Boulevard. In the study area, Balboa
Boulevard is essentially a six-lane roadway divided by left turn lanes. The intersection of Balboa Boulevard
and Lassen Street is signalized.

Lassen Street is an east-west roadway that becomes Filmore Street to the east and ends at the Oakwood
Memorial Park and Cemetery to the west. It has four lanes divided by left turn lanes in the study area.

Mayall Street is an east-west roadway which to the east forms a T intersection at Woodman Avenue and to
the west becomes Fullerfarm Street. In the study area, Mayall Street is essentially a two-lane undivided
roadway with on-street parking allowed on both sides of the street. The intersection of Mayall Street and
Balboa Boulevard is signalized.

Louise Avenue has a north-south alignment and continues to the north beyond the SR-118 Freeway,
ending in a residential tract at Rushing Drive. To the south, it ends at Victory Boulevard. In the study area,
there are two undivided lanes north of Lassen Street, with bicycle lanes and on-street parking provided on
both sides. South of Lassen Street there are four divided travel lanes. The Louise Avenue and Lassen
Street intersection is signalized.

Hayvenhurst Avenue is a north-south roadway which extends to the north just beyond the SR-118
Freeway and ending at Rinaldi Street. To the south, Hayvenhurst Avenue terminates at Roscoe Boulevard.
In the study area, Hayvenhurst Avenue has four divided travel lanes. The intersection of Hayvenhurst
Avenue and Lassen Street is controlled with a traffic signal.

Superior Street-Citronia Street is an east-west roadway that is Superior Street west of Balboa Boulevard
and Citronia Street east of Balboa Boulevard. Citronia Street terminates in a T intersection at Gerald
Avenue, while Superior Street ends at Zelzah Avenue. In the study area, there are two undivided travel
lanes. The intersection of Balboa Boulevard and Superior Street-Citronia Street is signalized.

Devonshire Street is an east-west roadway which becomes Arleta Avenue east of the I-405 Freeway. To
the west, Devonshire Street becomes Shadow Oak Drive at the Chatsworth Park South. In the study area,
Devonshire Street is a four-lane divided roadway. The intersection of Balboa Boulevard and Devonshire
Street is signalized.

A professional traffic count firm, Counts Unlimited, conducted the peak period traffic counts and turning
movement counts on Tuesday, November 15, 2016 during the 7:00-10:00 AM and 3:00-6:00 PM peak
periods. The counts were summarized per LADOT procedures for use in the intersection analyses, and the
summary worksheets are provided in Appendix A.
Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.
January 5, 2017
Page 5

INTERSECTION ANALYSES - EXISTING CONDITIONS

The existing AM peak period volumes were referenced for use in the intersection analyses. The existing
volumes at the study intersections during the peak commuter’s hours are shown in Figure 3. Turning
movement volumes can also be referenced from the CMA intersection analyses worksheet provided in
Appendix B. For consistency of analysis and as required, the CMA spreadsheets were used in this study
to analyze the study location. These worksheets also document the current intersection geometries and
pertinent field data used in the existing conditions analyses, which was collected during field observations
of the study area.

Where appropriate, right turn lanes were assumed if functional width is available even if the lanes are not
striped, which is consistent with traffic engineering practices. In addition, signal phasing information was
noted, and LADOT provided input for the ATSAC/ATCS assumptions (the study intersection is assumed to
have ATSAC/ATCS capabilities), which was inputted into the CMA analyses as well.

In general terms, the CMA intersection analysis methodology provides ratios of the peak period intersection
volumes for the various lane movements to the corresponding intersection lane capacities (essentially, the
same as Intersection Capacity Utilization, or ICU, analyses). The volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratios for the
critical intersection movements are then identified to determine the overall intersection operations.

CMA analyses also include traffic signal factors such as lost time due to signal phasing (similar to Highway
Capacity Manual analyses), and account for the presence of City of Los Angeles ATSAC/ATCS signal
coordination systems, as referenced above. The ability of the LADOT spreadsheet to include specific
consideration of ATSAC/ATCS presence was another justification for use of the CMA methodology.

The CMA analysis results in overall intersection v/c ratios. Similar to a school grading system, specified
ranges of v/c values (similar to test scores) correspond to Levels of Service (LOS) that indicate intersection
operations (similar to the school letter grades) that range from LOS A, the best, to LOS F, the worst
Appendix B contains the specific v/c ranges that correspond to the different LOS intersection operation
results.

General practice for traffic analyses are that LOS A through LOS D/E operations at roadway intersections
are considered to have acceptable operations, while LOS E/F findings are typically defined as over capacity
operation. LADOT, however, has specific definitions and requirements related to “Significant Impact
Thresholds,” which are included in Appendix C. The LADOT thresholds are based on the LOS, combined
with specific allowed increases in the v/c ratio, before an impact is indicated. This is a “worst case” factor
which additionally served as justification for use of the LADOT methodology.

Table 1 on page 7 summarizes the results of the intersection analyses findings under existing conditions
which form the basis for determining if significant Starbucks generated impacts are anticipated. The specific
measures of traffic impacts are detailed in the following report sections and are incorporated in the LADOT
worksheets. All six of the study intersections currently operate at LOS D or better during both the AM and
PM peak periods. The CMA worksheets are provided in Appendix B.
Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.
January 5, 2017
Page 6
Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.
January 5, 2017
Page 7
TABLE 1
INTERSECTION ANALYSES SUMMARY
EXISTING AND EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITION
CMA / LOS
EXISTING
EXISTING + PROJECT
INTERSECTION AM PM AM PM
Balboa Boulevard & Lassen Street 0.759 / C 0.684 / B 0.775 / C 0.695 / B
Balboa Boulevard & Mayall Street 0.327 / A 0.299 / A 0.331 / A 0.301 / A
Balboa Boulevard & Superior Street-Citronia Street 0.400 / A 0.325 / A 0.404 / A 0.326 / A
Balboa Boulevard & Devonshire Street 0.832 / D 0.899 / D 0.835 / D 0.900 / D
Louise Avenue & Lassen Street 0.703 / C 0.683 / B 0.707 / C 0.685 / B
Hayvenhurst Avenue & Lassen Street 0.816 / D 0.665 / B 0.822 / D 0.668 / B

PROJECT CONDITIONS

TRIP GENERATION

A Starbucks restaurant with a drive-through is proposed to be constructed at the project site subsequent to
the demolition of an existing and currently occupied medical-dental use building. Trip generation analyses
were completed to document the net trip generation effects of the proposed Starbucks. The evaluations
were developed in conjunction with LADOT staff during the MOU process, which resulted in the trip
generation totals assumed and analyzed. The following is a brief summary of the general trip generation
process applied:

• Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) rates were applied to the current uses as well as the
proposed Starbucks. In order to quantify potential trip increases/decreases, ITE trip rates were
referenced from the Trip Generation Manual (9th Ed. 2012). The trip generation rates used, land
use sizes, and resulting trip ends generated are summarized in Table 2 on the following page. For
a coffee/espresso shop use, the ITE trip generation rates are based on the building area and were
used in the intersection analyses.
• Years of research and field studies have documented the fact that many land uses will have pass-
by trip reduction factors. It is known (especially for coffee/espresso shops) that a significant
percentage of future customers come from the existing traffic already on adjacent roadways. These
pass-by trips, therefore, do not generate added traffic (e.g., a person is already traveling on Balboa
Boulevard or Lassen Street may stop for coffee, which does not generate added traffic).
• Pass-by trip credits (reductions) of 50% were applied to the trip generation results. This credit was
referenced from the LADOT standard allowed percentage reductions for the category of uses
which also includes small shopping centers, fast food restaurants, gas stations, dry cleaners, etc.
• The ITE Trip Generation Manual contains pass-by study findings specific for coffee/espresso
shops. Those findings indicate that the pass-by reductions may actually be in the 89% range;
however, to provide a conservative evaluation, the LADOT percentage of 50% was used in these
analyses.
Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.
January 5, 2017
Page 8
TABLE 2
TRIP GENERATION
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use Units Daily In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Generation Rates:
-Coffee/Doughnut shop per TSF 818.58 51% 49% 100.58 50% 50% 42.80
-Medical-Dental Office per TSF 36.13 79% 21% 2.39 28% 72% 3.57
Trip Ends Generated:
Proposed Starbucks Project:
-Starbucks w/ Drive-Thru 2,240 SF 1834 114.90 110.40 225.30 47.93 47.94 95.87
(50% Pass-by credit) -917 -57.45 -55.20 -112.65 -23.97 -23.97 -47.94
-(Existing Medical-Dental) (2,240 SF) -81 -4.23 -1.12 -5.35 -2.24 -5.76 -8.00
Subtotal (no Pass-by credits) 1834 115 110 225 48 48 96
Totals (with Pass-by credits) 836 53 54 107 22 18 40
Pass-by Source: Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition; Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE); 2012 and City of LA input.
Note: Daily & peak Trip Ends generated are rounded to the nearest 1, per previous City of LA input.
Source: Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition; Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE); 2012
Coffee/Doughnut shop rates are "with drive-through," per Manual code (937). Medical-Dental Office (720) rates were used for the existing use.
TSF = 1,000 square feet

• It should also be noted that internal trip reduction factors are allowed, but were not applied in this
study given that the proposed Starbucks would be located adjacent to another property but without
joint access. Even though other properties may be accessed without affecting some study
intersections (which would be similar to some level of internal/non-vehicle trips), no reductions
were assumed.

The trip generation rates applied to the proposed Project are shown in Table 2. The results show that the
net trip generations (before any pass-by considerations) are 1,834 daily trip ends with 225 (115 In, 110 Out)
AM peak period, and 96 (48 In, 48 Out) PM peak period trip ends. Table 2 also shows the total increases
after the (conservative) pass-by reductions are applied. The Starbucks would generate an added 836 daily
trip ends with 107 (53 In, 54 Out) AM peak period trip ends and 40 (22 In, 18 Out) during the PM peak
period. Due to the subtraction of the existing uses and different travel patterns on a daily and peak period
basis, the results are not necessarily proportional.

In summary, the trip generation estimates used in this traffic study are a conservative representation of
anticipated future traffic impacts. The actual net impacts should be less because worst case assumptions
were utilized.

TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT

Trip distribution patterns for the proposed Starbucks were developed based upon the type of land use
proposed, potential trip attractors in the area, the surrounding street system, and other pertinent
considerations. Based on the general distribution patterns, specific trip assignment percentages at each of
the study intersections were identified. These trip assignment percentages (at each of the study locations)
Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.
January 5, 2017
Page 9

during the AM and PM peak periods are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively. The trip end totals
in Table 2 were then assigned to the surrounding street system based on the trip assignment percentages,
resulting in the “Project Only” traffic volumes shown in Figure 6. The following are some of the pertinent
worst case factors applied in the analyses (and reflected in the volumes shown in Figure 6) at the study
intersections:

♦ It should be noted, the 50% pass-by reduction recommended for application to Starbucks is based
on a general category that includes other types of land uses. Evidence (i.e., ITE “Trip Generation
Handbook” data, etc.) suggest the actual pass-by reductions documented for a coffee/espresso
shop are much greater (an approximate 89% range) than 50%.
♦ It is also known there are many Starbucks options that exist, which is another reason we believe
there is increased expectation for pass-by patrons – and a reduced potential for people to travel
out of their normal driving route(s) to visit this particular Starbucks store (if built).
♦ However, in order to be very conservative and consistent with LADOT assumptions, only half of the
Starbucks trips were considered pass-by.
♦ This reduction was applied to both inbound and outbound trips in analyzing the six study locations.
As noted, a zero reduction was assumed even though the actual pass-by percentage indicated in
the ITE publication is an approximate 89% reduction (for both inbound and outbound.)

We believe the analyses applied at the study intersections represents worst case evaluations of potential
traffic impacts.

EXSTING + PROJECT CONDITIONS

PROPOSED PROJECT IMPACTS

The Starbucks generated trip increases were added to the existing traffic volumes and conditions so
potential impacts could be quantified. These “Exiting + Project” evaluations serve to satisfy informational
requirements under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The TSPP, however, has adopted
“Significant Impact Thresholds” (the reference is provided in Appendix C) which are based on future traffic
conditions. These analyses are presented later in this study and serve as the basis for any mitigation
requirements.

The “Existing + Project” intersection volumes are illustrated in Figure 7. These volumes were evaluated
based on the existing lane geometries so specific Starbucks related traffic impacts could be identified. The
calculations and findings are documented in the CMA worksheets. The intersection analyses findings for
“Existing + Project” conditions are summarized in Table 1. The proposed Starbucks is not expected to have
any significant environmental impact.
Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.
January 5, 2017
Page 10
Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.
January 5, 2017
Page 11
Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.
January 5, 2017
Page 12
Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.
January 5, 2017
Page 13
Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.
January 5, 2017
Page 14

MITIGATION MEASURES

Since Table 1 shows that the Starbucks is not expected to cause any significant traffic impact at the study
intersections, no mitigation measures are anticipated to be needed. However, this must be confirmed by
the future conditions analyses per LADOT requirements.

FUTURE: PRE-PROJECT CONDITIONS (EXISTING + AMBIENT GROWTH + RELATED PROJECTS)

Analyses of future conditions, both with and without the Starbucks, were conducted at the study
intersections. Traffic growth factors were taken into consideration when analyzing future conditions, which
included ambient growth and planned future development (both cumulative and related projects).

AMBIENT GROWTH AND RELATED PROJECTS

The ambient growth and related projects traffic assumptions serve to create baseline traffic conditions for a
future year, which was assumed to be 2017. Ambient growth accounts for general traffic increases. The
related projects growth factor accounts for new potential developments which may be occupied within the
same time frame as the Starbucks restaurant. These potential developments were addressed through a
growth rate, plus some potential projects were specifically analyzed and included.

There was coordination with LADOT in the development of a rate to address both the ambient growth and
related projects and their potential effects on the study intersection. A growth factor of 2% per year was
used and is expected to provide a reasonable (and conservative) projection of future traffic conditions,
since this rate was applied to all intersection movements at each study location. The application of the
growth factor is documented in the CMA worksheets.

In addition to the growth factor increases, LADOT provided a list of specific projects to be included in these
analyses. The list of related projects was noted, the potential impacts on the study intersections analyzed,
and their potential traffic effects were included in the evaluations. In order to provide a worst case scenario,
each of the related projects were assumed to be 100% constructed and occupied, though it is likely some
of the traffic will not exist until after completion of the proposed Starbucks.

We were provided traffic information for two additional projects located at 16617 Parthenia Street and
15508 Plummer Street. Based on the traffic analyses for those developments, the potential traffic increases
were included in these evaluations. Added details regarding the assumptions made regarding these related
projects are provided in Appendix D. The cumulative traffic effects of these related projects are shown in
Figure 8 and can also be referenced from the CMA worksheets.
Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.
January 5, 2017
Page 15
Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.
January 5, 2017
Page 16

EXISTING PLUS AMBIENT GROWTH PLUS RELATED PROJECTS ANALYSIS (WITHOUT PROJECT)

The existing intersection volumes were increased using the ambient growth and related projects
assumptions identified above so the CMA analyses could be updated for future traffic conditions (without
the Starbucks). These future traffic volumes are illustrated in Figure 9. The CMA worksheets also
document these volumes at the study intersections.

The results of the CMA analyses are summarized in Table 3. Under pre-project conditions, five of the six
study intersections operate at LOS D or better during both the AM and PM peak periods. The Balboa
Boulevard and Devonshire Street intersection operates at LOS D and E during the AM and PM peak
periods, respectively.

TABLE 3
INTERSECTION ANALYSES SUMMARY
PRE-PROJECT AND POST-PROJECT CONDITIONS
FUTURE FUTURE
PRE-PROJECT POST-PROJECT
(Includes: Existing Vol.,
Related Projects, Growth (Pre-Project + Project)
INTERSECTION AM PM AM PM
Balboa Boulevard & Lassen Street 0.776 / C 0.701 / C 0.793 / C 0.711 / C
Balboa Boulevard & Mayall Street 0.337 / A 0.309 / A 0.341 / A 0.309 / A
Balboa Boulevard & Superior Street-Citronia Street 0.412 / A 0.335 / A 0.416 / A 0.335 / A
Balboa Boulevard & Devonshire Street 0.852 / D 0.920 / E 0.856 / D 0.920 / E
Louise Avenue & Lassen Street 0.722 / C 0.701 / C 0.725 / C 0.704 / C
Hayvenhurst Avenue & Lassen Street 0.839 / D 0.683 / B 0.845 / D 0.686 / B

FUTURE: POST-PROJECT CONDITIONS (PRE-PROJECT + PROJECT)

PROPOSED PROJECT IMPACTS

The proposed trips shown in Figure 6 were added to the pre-project traffic volumes so that post-project
(pre-project + project) conditions could be evaluated. The resulting post-project traffic volumes are shown in
Figure 10. The CMA analyses were again applied to the study intersection.

The CMA summary worksheet documents the post-project calculations and is included in Appendix B. As
shown in Table 3, all six of the study intersections maintain the same LOS and there are no significant
traffic impacts caused by the proposed Starbucks. Since the Starbucks will not generate any significant
impact in spite of the various worst case assumptions incorporated, no mitigation measures are anticipated.
Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.
January 5, 2017
Page 17
Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.
January 5, 2017
Page 18
Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.
January 5, 2017
Page 19

CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ANALYSIS

With the passage of the gas tax increase (Proposition 111) in June 1990, came a requirement that each
urbanized area in the State with a population of 50,000 or more adopt a Congestion Management Program
(CMP). A program was developed for Los Angeles County, with input from local and regional agencies, and
a summary of the efforts was published in the Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County.

Included in the CMP are guidelines for satisfying CMP traffic impact analysis requirements. This Project
does not add 50 or more peak period trips to any CMP arterial monitoring intersection. In addition, no
mainline freeway sections would be impacted by 150 or more trips during the AM or PM peak periods.
Therefore, no significant CMP traffic impacts are anticipated to be generated by the proposed Starbucks.

The Balboa Boulevard and Victory Boulevard intersection is the nearest CMP monitoring location, which is
significantly south of the study area. The nearest mainline freeway segments would be the SR-118
Freeway to the north and I-405 Freeway to the east, nearly two miles from proposed Starbucks site, and
would not be significantly impacted by the proposed Project.

PARKING

The City of Los Angeles parking code was referenced when reviewing the parking requirements for the
proposed Starbucks to assure compliance with the parking standards. It is required that there be one
parking space for each 100 sf based on the building area. The proposed Starbucks will be 2,240 sf, so one
space per 100 sf = 22.4 spaces. The Site Plan shows that 23 on-site parking spaces will be provided, which
will adequately meet the parking demand needs.

SITE TRAFFIC REQUIREMENTS

There are two access points proposed for the project site: one at Balboa Boulevard and one at Lassen
Street. Both will be full-access driveways located away from the intersection (a maximum distance allowed
within the project site boundaries). A double-yellow stripe (associated with left turn lanes) and two-way left
turn lane striping exists on Balboa Boulevard and Lassen Street along the project frontage, respectively.
The two driveways and their planned access movements are anticipated to adequately serve the proposed
Project.

Both driveways will involve curb-cut construction work in the public right-of-way, which means engineering
plans will be required and approved by the City of Los Angeles. The approved driveway plans and
construction should provide designs to adequately serve the anticipated traffic (which will be comprised
mostly of passenger vehicles).

Starbucks truck deliveries typically occur once per day during early morning hours before the store opens.
Two-axle truck are used for the deliveries and, since they occur before the store opens for business, they
can park at virtually any acceptable on-site location and not be in conflict with customer vehicle traffic.
These planned deliveries should be adequately accommodated by the project site.
Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.
January 5, 2017
Page 20

SUMMARY

Traffic and parking factors for the proposed Starbucks at the northeast corner of Balboa Boulevard and
Lassen Street were examined and the potential impacts documented. The traffic analyses examined
existing, existing + project, future pre-project, and post-project conditions. The potential traffic impacts were
evaluated and the potential need for mitigation/improvement measures was addressed. The City of Los
Angeles parking code requirements were reviewed, as well as access and on-site circulation factors
associated with the proposed Starbucks. The principal findings of this study are listed below.

1) Under “Existing” conditions, all six of the study intersections operate at LOS D or better for both AM
and PM peak period conditions.
2) The trip generation potential for the proposed Starbucks is based on worst case assumptions. The
trip generation results are based on the work completed in conjunction with LADOT staff. The
pass-by percentage reductions applied in the analyses are lower than ITE data (suggesting greater
pass-by trip reduction assumptions could have been supported). In addition, no internal trip
reductions were applied; therefore, the traffic analyses contained in this study would be considered
a worst case evaluation.
3) For “Existing + Project” conditions, the six study intersections were analyzed and no significant
traffic impact are expected to be generated by the Starbucks (even using the worst case trip
generation assumptions) as shown in Table 1.
4) Under future Pre-Project conditions, five of the six study intersections will have LOS D or better
operations during both the AM and PM peak periods. The Balboa Boulevard and Devonshire Street
intersection will have LOS D and E during the AM and PM peak periods, respectively.
5) For Post-Project (Pre-Project + Project) conditions, the same LOS results will be maintained at all
six study intersections. In addition, no significant traffic impacts are shown to be generated by the
Starbucks per LADOT adopted standards; therefore, no mitigation measures are anticipated to be
needed.
6) The City of Los Angeles parking requirements were reviewed. The parking code indicates that 22.4
parking spaces would be needed to satisfy code requirements for the Starbucks. The site plan
shows a total of 23 parking spaces would be provided, so the proposed parking supply was found
to be acceptable.
7) This study included an evaluation of access and on-site circulation factors. Overall the proposed
access and on-site circulation is anticipated to provide acceptable operations.
Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E.
January 5, 2017
Page 21

We trust that these analyses will be of assistance to you, LADOT, and others. If you have any questions or
comments, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Respectfully submitted,

ALBERT GROVER and ASSOCIATES

Dave Roseman, T.E.


Principal Transportation Engineer

Kaidence\817-002\Report\Starbucks 9900 Balboa Letter Report.docx


APPENDIX A

Count Summary Worksheets


City Of Los Angeles
Department Of Transportation
MANUAL TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY
STREET:
North/South Balboa Boulevard

East/West Devonshire Street

Day: Tuesday Date: November 15, 2016 Weather: CLEAR

Hours: 7-10AM 3-6PM Staff: CUI

School Day: YES District: West Valley I/S CODE 33082

N/B S/B E/B W/B


DUAL-
WHEELED 107 85 74 94
BIKES 8 9 13 18
BUSES 46 54 47 44

N/B TIME S/B TIME E/B TIME W/B TIME

AM PK 15 MIN 299 7.45 462 7.45 301 7.45 387 7.30

PM PK 15 MIN 370 5.15 339 3.15 411 5.00 309 5.30

AM PK HOUR 1073 7.30 1692 7.45 1094 7.30 1433 7.00

PM PK HOUR 1408 3.30 1306 3.00 1575 5.00 1175 4.45

NORTHBOUND Approach SOUTHBOUND Approach TOTAL XING S/L XING N/L

Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total N-S Ped Sch Ped Sch


7-8 168 618 129 915 7-8 169 1212 202 1583 2498 9 31 11 77
8-9 123 634 116 873 8-9 144 1186 239 1569 2442 12 5 10 12
9-10 102 575 93 770 9-10 135 807 130 1072 1842 19 4 10 0
3-4 184 1033 155 1372 3-4 219 889 198 1306 2678 21 84 6 152
4-5 166 1051 177 1394 4-5 194 822 181 1197 2591 17 33 6 56
5-6 168 1089 151 1408 5-6 211 724 157 1092 2500 18 15 3 44

TOTAL 911 5000 821 6732 TOTAL 1072 5640 1107 7819 14551 96 172 46 341

EASTBOUND Approach WESTBOUND Approach TOTAL XING W/L XING E/L

Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total E-W Ped Sch Ped Sch


7-8 100 808 97 1005 7-8 229 1084 120 1433 2438 8 65 15 24
8-9 127 707 127 961 8-9 211 921 153 1285 2246 3 5 8 2
9-10 113 475 116 704 9-10 136 601 125 862 1566 11 1 9 0
3-4 235 974 185 1394 3-4 158 767 204 1129 2523 23 175 7 63
4-5 216 1073 161 1450 4-5 146 736 195 1077 2527 23 42 17 39
5-6 248 1164 163 1575 5-6 167 824 161 1152 2727 14 22 9 13

TOTAL 1039 5201 849 7089 TOTAL 1047 4933 958 6938 14027 82 310 65 141

(Rev Oct 06)


City Of Los Angeles
Department Of Transportation
MANUAL TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY
STREET:
North/South Balboa Boulevard

East/West Lassen Street

Day: Tuesday Date: November 15, 2016 Weather: CLEAR

Hours: 7-10AM 3-6PM Staff: CUI

School Day: YES District: West Valley I/S CODE 32830

N/B S/B E/B W/B


DUAL-
WHEELED 89 58 62 52
BIKES 9 13 5 3
BUSES 50 53 39 32

N/B TIME S/B TIME E/B TIME W/B TIME

AM PK 15 MIN 316 7.45 434 8.00 340 7.45 488 7.30

PM PK 15 MIN 373 3.15 312 3.00 367 5.15 278 3.00

AM PK HOUR 1105 7.30 1629 7.45 1250 7.15 1802 7.15

PM PK HOUR 1413 3.15 1187 3.00 1413 5.00 901 3.00

NORTHBOUND Approach SOUTHBOUND Approach TOTAL XING S/L XING N/L

Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total N-S Ped Sch Ped Sch


7-8 65 761 95 921 7-8 63 1318 109 1490 2411 5 0 3 0
8-9 78 721 88 887 8-9 78 1305 164 1547 2434 7 0 1 0
9-10 53 619 43 715 9-10 48 852 121 1021 1736 2 0 1 0
3-4 111 1182 119 1412 3-4 91 954 142 1187 2599 11 2 14 0
4-5 112 1140 95 1347 4-5 91 831 130 1052 2399 4 0 4 7
5-6 90 1157 120 1367 5-6 76 845 140 1061 2428 5 0 5 0

TOTAL 509 5580 560 6649 TOTAL 447 6105 806 7358 14007 34 2 28 7

EASTBOUND Approach WESTBOUND Approach TOTAL XING W/L XING E/L

Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total E-W Ped Sch Ped Sch


7-8 62 881 192 1135 7-8 234 1369 117 1720 2855 5 0 3 0
8-9 86 635 212 933 8-9 153 939 92 1184 2117 7 0 2 0
9-10 100 345 136 581 9-10 74 461 77 612 1193 1 0 5 1
3-4 131 874 135 1140 3-4 100 671 130 901 2041 9 0 10 6
4-5 137 995 153 1285 4-5 93 617 130 840 2125 12 0 8 13
5-6 141 1172 100 1413 5-6 88 614 133 835 2248 9 0 7 0

TOTAL 657 4902 928 6487 TOTAL 742 4671 679 6092 12579 43 0 35 20

(Rev Oct 06)


City Of Los Angeles
Department Of Transportation
MANUAL TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY
STREET:
North/South Balboa Boulevard

East/West Mayall Street

Day: Tuesday Date: November 15, 2016 Weather: CLEAR

Hours: 7-10AM 3-6PM Staff: CUI

School Day: YES District: West Valley I/S CODE 0

N/B S/B E/B W/B


DUAL-
WHEELED 92 95 5 6
BIKES 9 15 3 4
BUSES 47 50 4 8

N/B TIME S/B TIME E/B TIME W/B TIME

AM PK 15 MIN 323 7.45 431 8.00 38 7.45 24 7.45

PM PK 15 MIN 395 3.15 329 3.00 34 5.30 19 3.15

AM PK HOUR 1112 7.30 1605 7.45 126 7.30 75 7.30

PM PK HOUR 1445 3.15 1245 3.00 97 4.45 43 3.00

NORTHBOUND Approach SOUTHBOUND Approach TOTAL XING S/L XING N/L

Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total N-S Ped Sch Ped Sch


7-8 37 898 8 943 7-8 19 1468 20 1507 2450 1 0 0 0
8-9 25 862 16 903 8-9 34 1464 29 1527 2430 0 0 5 0
9-10 25 753 9 787 9-10 15 963 25 1003 1790 5 0 4 0
3-4 34 1386 12 1432 3-4 34 1143 68 1245 2677 0 0 4 2
4-5 34 1364 5 1403 4-5 31 1013 54 1098 2501 0 0 6 2
5-6 43 1328 16 1387 5-6 42 1010 80 1132 2519 1 0 4 1

TOTAL 198 6591 66 6855 TOTAL 175 7061 276 7512 14367 7 0 23 5

EASTBOUND Approach WESTBOUND Approach TOTAL XING W/L XING E/L

Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total E-W Ped Sch Ped Sch


7-8 29 2 61 92 7-8 15 5 43 63 155 0 1 5 0
8-9 33 5 70 108 8-9 23 3 35 61 169 2 1 5 0
9-10 26 0 32 58 9-10 11 1 24 36 94 4 0 3 0
3-4 36 8 49 93 3-4 6 5 32 43 136 1 18 3 8
4-5 47 3 35 85 4-5 6 7 27 40 125 13 2 10 5
5-6 51 5 35 91 5-6 7 1 22 30 121 4 0 8 0

TOTAL 222 23 282 527 TOTAL 68 22 183 273 800 24 22 34 13

(Rev Oct 06)


City Of Los Angeles
Department Of Transportation
MANUAL TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY
STREET:
North/South Balboa Boulevard

East/West Superior Street/Citronia Street

Day: Tuesday Date: November 15, 2016 Weather: CLEAR

Hours: 7-10AM 3-6PM Staff: CUI

School Day: YES District: West Valley I/S CODE 0

N/B S/B E/B W/B


DUAL-
WHEELED 96 88 3 3
BIKES 7 10 2 1
BUSES 51 66 0 4

N/B TIME S/B TIME E/B TIME W/B TIME

AM PK 15 MIN 289 7.45 501 8.15 93 8.00 43 7.45

PM PK 15 MIN 372 3.15 318 3.45 33 3.15 25 3.30

AM PK HOUR 1000 7.15 1891 7.30 241 7.45 114 7.15

PM PK HOUR 1412 3.15 1186 3.00 120 3.00 59 4.30

NORTHBOUND Approach SOUTHBOUND Approach TOTAL XING S/L XING N/L

Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total N-S Ped Sch Ped Sch


7-8 45 864 14 923 7-8 21 1549 116 1686 2609 1 0 0 1
8-9 38 777 19 834 8-9 33 1536 135 1704 2538 2 0 7 1
9-10 24 661 12 697 9-10 19 1004 16 1039 1736 0 0 1 0
3-4 44 1328 25 1397 3-4 55 1088 43 1186 2583 0 0 0 2
4-5 38 1276 19 1333 4-5 64 955 19 1038 2371 0 0 1 0
5-6 17 1350 22 1389 5-6 78 922 19 1019 2408 1 0 0 1

TOTAL 206 6256 111 6573 TOTAL 270 7054 348 7672 14245 4 0 9 5

EASTBOUND Approach WESTBOUND Approach TOTAL XING W/L XING E/L

Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total E-W Ped Sch Ped Sch


7-8 42 5 38 85 7-8 43 31 34 108 193 1 0 0 0
8-9 76 11 106 193 8-9 16 10 22 48 241 3 0 3 0
9-10 18 2 28 48 9-10 7 0 26 33 81 2 0 1 0
3-4 48 9 63 120 3-4 12 5 40 57 177 3 6 0 1
4-5 38 6 42 86 4-5 11 4 38 53 139 0 3 2 2
5-6 25 11 34 70 5-6 17 7 33 57 127 2 5 1 0

TOTAL 247 44 311 602 TOTAL 106 57 193 356 958 11 14 7 3

(Rev Oct 06)


City Of Los Angeles
Department Of Transportation
MANUAL TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY
STREET:
North/South Hayvenhurst Avenue

East/West Lassen Street

Day: Tuesday Date: November 15, 2016 Weather: CLEAR

Hours: 7-10AM 3-6PM Staff: CUI

School Day: YES District: West Valley I/S CODE 33710

N/B S/B E/B W/B


DUAL-
WHEELED 65 39 65 49
BIKES 5 2 3 3
BUSES 17 27 44 38

N/B TIME S/B TIME E/B TIME W/B TIME

AM PK 15 MIN 211 7.45 384 8.00 327 7.45 462 7.45

PM PK 15 MIN 240 5.15 167 3.00 354 5.15 205 3.00

AM PK HOUR 637 7.15 1331 7.15 1187 7.15 1620 7.15

PM PK HOUR 890 4.45 564 3.00 1343 4.45 739 4.30

NORTHBOUND Approach SOUTHBOUND Approach TOTAL XING S/L XING N/L

Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total N-S Ped Sch Ped Sch


7-8 111 442 67 620 7-8 84 785 224 1093 1713 1 0 2 1
8-9 64 284 34 382 8-9 59 677 177 913 1295 5 0 1 0
9-10 34 166 16 216 9-10 21 208 99 328 544 3 0 2 1
3-4 74 575 69 718 3-4 51 362 151 564 1282 0 4 4 0
4-5 78 647 58 783 4-5 59 336 118 513 1296 2 1 4 0
5-6 82 689 96 867 5-6 50 315 99 464 1331 3 1 4 0

TOTAL 443 2803 340 3586 TOTAL 324 2683 868 3875 7461 14 6 17 2

EASTBOUND Approach WESTBOUND Approach TOTAL XING W/L XING E/L

Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total E-W Ped Sch Ped Sch


7-8 88 873 115 1076 7-8 119 1340 124 1583 2659 0 0 0 0
8-9 80 704 70 854 8-9 74 901 30 1005 1859 0 0 3 0
9-10 50 369 23 442 9-10 28 424 25 477 919 0 0 0 0
3-4 161 846 62 1069 3-4 45 634 52 731 1800 2 0 1 1
4-5 139 974 72 1185 4-5 40 613 49 702 1887 0 0 0 0
5-6 149 1129 65 1343 5-6 44 621 63 728 2071 2 0 4 0

TOTAL 667 4895 407 5969 TOTAL 350 4533 343 5226 11195 4 0 8 1

(Rev Oct 06)


City Of Los Angeles
Department Of Transportation
MANUAL TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY
STREET:
North/South Louise Avenue

East/West Lassen Street

Day: Tuesday Date: November 15, 2016 Weather: CLEAR

Hours: 7-10AM 3-6PM Staff: CUI

School Day: YES District: West Valley I/S CODE 32821

N/B S/B E/B W/B


DUAL-
WHEELED 7 5 68 44
BIKES 3 3 3 3
BUSES 10 7 38 23

N/B TIME S/B TIME E/B TIME W/B TIME

AM PK 15 MIN 176 7.45 166 7.30 397 7.45 419 7.30

PM PK 15 MIN 131 3.15 87 3.15 413 5.00 271 3.00

AM PK HOUR 493 7.15 595 7.15 1320 7.15 1537 7.15

PM PK HOUR 454 3.00 259 3.00 1510 5.00 951 3.00

NORTHBOUND Approach SOUTHBOUND Approach TOTAL XING S/L XING N/L

Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total N-S Ped Sch Ped Sch


7-8 105 272 46 423 7-8 80 386 45 511 934 1 1 0 0
8-9 71 159 26 256 8-9 49 242 37 328 584 1 0 0 0
9-10 25 59 26 110 9-10 12 67 25 104 214 2 0 2 0
3-4 107 295 52 454 3-4 54 174 31 259 713 2 0 0 0
4-5 54 252 55 361 4-5 30 126 25 181 542 0 0 0 0
5-6 75 296 50 421 5-6 31 144 38 213 634 2 1 0 0

TOTAL 437 1333 255 2025 TOTAL 256 1139 201 1596 3621 8 2 2 0

EASTBOUND Approach WESTBOUND Approach TOTAL XING W/L XING E/L

Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total E-W Ped Sch Ped Sch


7-8 27 1043 153 1223 7-8 104 1271 103 1478 2701 0 0 0 0
8-9 26 783 71 880 8-9 78 1054 24 1156 2036 0 0 1 0
9-10 27 501 25 553 9-10 28 582 11 621 1174 0 0 2 0
3-4 52 1115 83 1250 3-4 31 863 57 951 2201 2 0 0 0
4-5 55 1214 72 1341 4-5 23 769 47 839 2180 0 0 0 0
5-6 81 1376 53 1510 5-6 35 785 38 858 2368 1 0 0 1

TOTAL 268 6032 457 6757 TOTAL 299 5324 280 5903 12660 3 0 3 1

(Rev Oct 06)


APPENDIX B

CMA Intersection Analyses


(LOS Worksheets)
Level of Service Workheet
(Circular 212 Method)
I/S #: North-South Street: Balboa Blvd. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date:
East-West Street: Devonshire St. Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa
No. of Phases 4 4 4 4 4
Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? 0 0 0 0 0
Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3?
NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0
EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0
ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? 2 2 2 2 2
Override Capacity 0 0 0 0 0
EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION
MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane
Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume
Left 168 1 168 0 168 168 0 171 1 171 0 171 1 171 0 171 1 171
NORTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 618 2 249 11 629 253 6 636 2 256 11 647 2 260 0 647 2 260
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 129 0 129 0 129 129 0 132 0 132 0 132 0 132 0 132 0 132
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 169 1 169 1 170 170 0 172 1 172 1 173 1 173 0 173 1 173
SOUTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 1212 2 471 11 1223 475 6 1242 2 483 11 1253 2 487 0 1253 2 487
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 202 0 202 1 203 203 0 206 0 206 1 207 0 207 0 207 0 207
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 100 1 100 1 101 101 0 102 1 102 1 103 1 103 0 103 1 103
EASTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 808 2 404 0 808 404 0 824 2 412 0 824 2 412 0 824 2 412
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 97 1 13 0 97 13 0 99 1 14 0 99 1 14 0 99 1 14
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 229 1 229 0 229 229 0 234 1 234 0 234 1 234 0 234 1 234
WESTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 1084 2 542 0 1084 542 0 1106 2 553 0 1106 2 553 0 1106 2 553
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 120 1 36 1 121 36 0 122 1 36 1 123 1 37 0 123 1 37
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0
North-South: 639 North-South: 643 North-South: 654 North-South: 658 North-South: 658
CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 642 East-West: 643 East-West: 655 East-West: 656 East-West: 656
SUM: 1281 SUM: 1286 SUM: 1309 SUM: 1314 SUM: 1314
VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: 0.932 0.935 0.952 0.956 0.956
V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: 0.832 0.835 0.852 0.856 0.856
LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): D D D D D
REMARKS:

Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT


Change in v/c due to project: 0.004 ∆v/c after mitigation: 0.004
Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A

12/16/2016-1:46 AM 1 CMA-Balboa&Devonshire
Level of Service Workheet
(Circular 212 Method)
I/S #: North-South Street: Balboa Blvd. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date:
East-West Street: Devonshire St. Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa
No. of Phases 4 4 4 4 4
Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? 0 0 0 0 0
Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3?
NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0
EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0
ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? 2 2 2 2 2
Override Capacity 0 0 0 0 0
EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION
MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane
Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume
Left 168 1 168 0 168 168 0 171 1 171 0 171 1 171 0 171 1 171
NORTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 1089 2 413 4 1093 415 4 1115 2 423 4 1119 2 424 0 1119 2 424
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 151 0 151 0 151 151 0 154 0 154 0 154 0 154 0 154 0 154
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 211 1 211 0 211 211 0 215 1 215 0 215 1 215 0 215 1 215
SOUTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 724 2 294 4 728 295 5 743 2 301 4 747 2 302 0 747 2 302
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 157 0 157 0 157 157 0 160 0 160 0 160 0 160 0 160 0 160
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 248 1 248 0 248 248 0 253 1 253 0 253 1 253 0 253 1 253
EASTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 1164 2 582 0 1164 582 0 1187 2 594 0 1187 2 594 0 1187 2 594
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 163 1 79 0 163 79 0 166 1 81 0 166 1 81 0 166 1 81
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 167 1 167 0 167 167 0 170 1 170 0 170 1 170 0 170 1 170
WESTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 824 2 412 0 824 412 0 840 2 420 0 840 2 420 0 840 2 420
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 161 1 56 0 161 56 0 164 1 57 0 164 1 57 0 164 1 57
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0
North-South: 624 North-South: 626 North-South: 638 North-South: 639 North-South: 639
CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 749 East-West: 749 East-West: 764 East-West: 764 East-West: 764
SUM: 1373 SUM: 1375 SUM: 1402 SUM: 1403 SUM: 1403
VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: 0.999 1.000 1.020 1.020 1.020
V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: 0.899 0.900 0.920 0.920 0.920
LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): D D E E E
REMARKS:

Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT


Change in v/c due to project: 0.000 ∆v/c after mitigation: 0.000
Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A

12/16/2016-1:45 AM 1 CMA-Balboa&Devonshire
Level of Service Workheet
(Circular 212 Method)
I/S #: North-South Street: Balboa Blvd. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date:
East-West Street: Lassen St. Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa
No. of Phases 2 2 2 2 2
Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? 0 0 0 0 0
Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3?
NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0
EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0
ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? 2 2 2 2 2
Override Capacity 0 0 0 0 0
EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION
MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane
Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume
Left 65 1 65 0 65 65 0 66 1 66 0 66 1 66 0 66 1 66
NORTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 761 2 285 28 789 295 6 782 2 293 28 810 2 302 0 810 2 302
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 95 0 95 0 95 95 0 97 0 97 0 97 0 97 0 97 0 97
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 63 1 63 0 63 63 0 64 1 64 0 64 1 64 0 64 1 64
SOUTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 1318 2 476 4 1322 478 6 1350 2 487 4 1354 2 490 0 1354 2 490
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 109 0 109 4 113 113 0 111 0 111 4 115 0 115 0 115 0 115
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 62 1 62 13 75 75 0 63 1 63 13 76 1 76 0 76 1 76
EASTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 881 2 441 13 894 447 0 899 2 450 13 912 2 456 0 912 2 456
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 192 1 160 0 192 160 0 196 1 163 0 196 1 163 0 196 1 163
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 234 1 234 22 256 256 0 239 1 239 22 261 1 261 0 261 1 261
WESTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 1369 2 685 20 1389 695 0 1396 2 698 20 1416 2 708 0 1416 2 708
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 117 1 86 0 117 86 0 119 1 87 0 119 1 87 0 119 1 87
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0
North-South: 541 North-South: 543 North-South: 553 North-South: 556 North-South: 556
CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 747 East-West: 770 East-West: 761 East-West: 784 East-West: 784
SUM: 1288 SUM: 1313 SUM: 1314 SUM: 1340 SUM: 1340
VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: 0.859 0.875 0.876 0.893 0.893
V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: 0.759 0.775 0.776 0.793 0.793
LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): C C C C C
REMARKS:

Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT


Change in v/c due to project: 0.017 ∆v/c after mitigation: 0.017
Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A

12/15/2016-3:54 PM 1 CMA-Balboa&Lassen
Level of Service Workheet
(Circular 212 Method)
I/S #: North-South Street: Balboa Blvd. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date:
East-West Street: Lassen St. Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa
No. of Phases 2 2 2 2 2
Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? 0 0 0 0 0
Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3?
NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0
EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0
ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? 2 2 2 2 2
Override Capacity 0 0 0 0 0
EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION
MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane
Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume
Left 90 1 90 0 90 90 0 92 1 92 0 92 1 92 0 92 1 92
NORTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 1157 2 426 12 1169 430 4 1184 2 435 12 1196 2 439 0 1196 2 439
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 120 0 120 0 120 120 0 122 0 122 0 122 0 122 0 122 0 122
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 76 1 76 0 76 76 0 78 1 78 0 78 1 78 0 78 1 78
SOUTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 845 2 328 2 847 330 5 867 2 337 2 869 2 338 0 869 2 338
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 140 0 140 2 142 142 0 143 0 143 2 145 0 145 0 145 0 145
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 141 1 141 5 146 146 0 144 1 144 5 149 1 149 0 149 1 149
EASTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 1172 2 586 5 1177 589 0 1195 2 598 5 1200 2 600 0 1200 2 600
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 100 1 55 0 100 55 0 102 1 56 0 102 1 56 0 102 1 56
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 88 1 88 10 98 98 0 90 1 90 10 100 1 100 0 100 1 100


WESTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 614 2 307 9 623 312 0 626 2 313 9 635 2 318 0 635 2 318
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 133 1 95 0 133 95 0 136 1 97 0 136 1 97 0 136 1 97
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0
North-South: 502 North-South: 506 North-South: 513 North-South: 517 North-South: 517
CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 674 East-West: 687 East-West: 688 East-West: 700 East-West: 700
SUM: 1176 SUM: 1193 SUM: 1201 SUM: 1217 SUM: 1217
VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: 0.784 0.795 0.801 0.811 0.811
V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: 0.684 0.695 0.701 0.711 0.711
LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): B B C C C
REMARKS:

Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT


Change in v/c due to project: 0.010 ∆v/c after mitigation: 0.010
Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A

12/15/2016-3:54 PM 1 CMA-Balboa&Lassen
Level of Service Workheet
(Circular 212 Method)
I/S #: North-South Street: Balboa Blvd. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date:
East-West Street: Mayall St. Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa
No. of Phases 2 2 2 2 2
Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? 0 0 0 0 0
Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3?
NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0
EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0
ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? 2 2 2 2 2
Override Capacity 0 0 0 0 0
EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION
MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane
Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume
Left 37 1 37 1 38 38 0 38 1 38 1 39 1 39 0 39 1 39
NORTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 898 2 302 14 912 307 6 922 2 310 14 936 2 315 0 936 2 315
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 8 0 8 1 9 9 0 8 0 8 1 9 0 9 0 9 0 9
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 19 1 19 0 19 19 0 19 1 19 0 19 1 19 0 19 1 19
SOUTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 1468 2 496 13 1481 500 6 1503 2 508 13 1516 2 512 0 1516 2 512
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 20 0 20 0 20 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 29 0 29 0 29 29 0 30 0 30 0 30 0 30 0 30 0 30
EASTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 2 0 92 0 2 93 0 2 0 94 0 2 0 95 0 2 0 95
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 61 0 0 1 62 0 0 62 0 0 1 63 0 0 0 63 0 0
Left-Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 15 0 15 1 16 16 0 15 0 15 1 16 0 16 0 16 0 16
WESTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 5 0 63 0 5 64 0 5 0 64 0 5 0 65 0 5 0 65
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 43 0 0 0 43 0 0 44 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 44 0 0
Left-Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Left-Right 0 0 0 0
North-South: 533 North-South: 538 North-South: 546 North-South: 551 North-South: 551
CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 107 East-West: 109 East-West: 109 East-West: 111 East-West: 111
SUM: 640 SUM: 647 SUM: 655 SUM: 662 SUM: 662
VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: 0.427 0.431 0.437 0.441 0.441
V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: 0.327 0.331 0.337 0.341 0.341
LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A A A A
REMARKS:

Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT


Change in v/c due to project: 0.004 ∆v/c after mitigation: 0.004
Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A

12/15/2016-9:10 PM 1 CMA-Balboa&Mayall
Level of Service Workheet
(Circular 212 Method)
I/S #: North-South Street: Balboa Blvd. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date:
East-West Street: Mayall St. Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa
No. of Phases 2 2 2 2 2
Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? 0 0 0 0 0
Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3?
NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0
EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0
ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? 2 2 2 2 2
Override Capacity 0 0 0 0 0
EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION
MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane
Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume
Left 34 1 34 0 34 34 0 35 1 35 0 35 1 35 0 35 1 35
NORTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 1386 2 466 5 1391 468 4 1418 2 477 5 1423 2 478 0 1423 2 478
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 12 0 12 0 12 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 34 1 34 0 34 34 0 35 1 35 0 35 1 35 0 35 1 35
SOUTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 1143 2 404 6 1149 406 5 1171 2 413 6 1177 2 415 0 1177 2 415
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 68 0 68 0 68 68 0 69 0 69 0 69 0 69 0 69 0 69
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 36 0 36 0 36 36 0 37 0 37 0 37 0 37 0 37 0 37
EASTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 8 0 93 0 8 93 0 8 0 95 0 8 0 95 0 8 0 95
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 49 0 0 0 49 0 0 50 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 50 0 0
Left-Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 6 0 6 0 6 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6
WESTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 5 0 43 0 5 43 0 5 0 44 0 5 0 44 0 5 0 44
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 32 0 0 0 32 0 0 33 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 33 0 0
Left-Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Left-Right 0 0 0 0
North-South: 500 North-South: 502 North-South: 512 North-South: 513 North-South: 513
CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 99 East-West: 99 East-West: 101 East-West: 101 East-West: 101
SUM: 599 SUM: 601 SUM: 613 SUM: 614 SUM: 614
VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: 0.399 0.401 0.409 0.409 0.409
V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: 0.299 0.301 0.309 0.309 0.309
LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A A A A
REMARKS:

Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT


Change in v/c due to project: 0.000 ∆v/c after mitigation: 0.000
Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A

12/15/2016-9:10 PM 1 CMA-Balboa&Mayall
Level of Service Workheet
(Circular 212 Method)
I/S #: North-South Street: Balboa Blvd. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date:
East-West Street: Superior-Citronia Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa
No. of Phases 2 2 2 2 2
Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? 0 0 0 0 0
Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3?
NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0
EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0
ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? 2 2 2 2 2
Override Capacity 0 0 0 0 0
EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION
MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane
Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume
Left 45 1 45 0 45 45 0 46 1 46 0 46 1 46 0 46 1 46
NORTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 864 2 293 11 875 296 6 887 2 300 11 898 2 304 0 898 2 304
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 14 0 14 0 14 14 0 14 0 14 0 14 0 14 0 14 0 14
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 21 1 21 1 22 22 0 21 1 21 1 22 1 22 0 22 1 22
SOUTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 1549 2 555 11 1560 559 6 1586 2 568 11 1597 2 572 0 1597 2 572
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 116 0 116 1 117 117 0 118 0 118 1 119 0 119 0 119 0 119
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 42 0 42 1 43 43 0 43 0 43 1 44 0 44 0 44 0 44
EASTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 5 0 85 0 5 86 0 5 0 87 0 5 0 88 0 5 0 88
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 38 0 0 0 38 0 0 39 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 39 0 0
Left-Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 43 0 43 0 43 43 0 44 0 44 0 44 0 44 0 44 0 44
WESTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 31 0 108 0 31 109 0 32 0 111 0 32 0 112 0 32 0 112
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 34 0 0 1 35 0 0 35 0 0 1 36 0 0 0 36 0 0
Left-Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Left-Right 0 0 0 0
North-South: 600 North-South: 604 North-South: 614 North-South: 618 North-South: 618
CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 150 East-West: 152 East-West: 154 East-West: 156 East-West: 156
SUM: 750 SUM: 756 SUM: 768 SUM: 774 SUM: 774
VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: 0.500 0.504 0.512 0.516 0.516
V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: 0.400 0.404 0.412 0.416 0.416
LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A A A A
REMARKS:

Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT


Change in v/c due to project: 0.004 ∆v/c after mitigation: 0.004
Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A

12/15/2016-11:06 PM 1 CMA-Balboa&Superior-Citronia
Level of Service Workheet
(Circular 212 Method)
I/S #: North-South Street: Balboa Blvd. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date:
East-West Street: Superior-Citronia Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa
No. of Phases 2 2 2 2 2
Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? 0 0 0 0 0
Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3?
NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0
EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0
ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? 2 2 2 2 2
Override Capacity 0 0 0 0 0
EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION
MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane
Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume
Left 44 1 44 0 44 44 0 45 1 45 0 45 1 45 0 45 1 45
NORTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 1328 2 451 4 1332 452 4 1359 2 462 4 1363 2 463 0 1363 2 463
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 25 0 25 0 25 25 0 26 0 26 0 26 0 26 0 26 0 26
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 55 1 55 0 55 55 0 56 1 56 0 56 1 56 0 56 1 56
SOUTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 1088 2 377 4 1092 378 5 1115 2 386 4 1119 2 388 0 1119 2 388
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 43 0 43 0 43 43 0 44 0 44 0 44 0 44 0 44 0 44
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 48 0 48 0 48 48 0 49 0 49 0 49 0 49 0 49 0 49
EASTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 9 0 120 0 9 120 0 9 0 122 0 9 0 122 0 9 0 122
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 63 0 0 0 63 0 0 64 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 64 0 0
Left-Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 12 0 12 0 12 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12
WESTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 5 0 57 0 5 57 0 5 0 58 0 5 0 58 0 5 0 58
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 40 0 0 0 40 0 0 41 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 41 0 0
Left-Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Left-Right 0 0 0 0
North-South: 506 North-South: 507 North-South: 518 North-South: 519 North-South: 519
CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 132 East-West: 132 East-West: 134 East-West: 134 East-West: 134
SUM: 638 SUM: 639 SUM: 652 SUM: 653 SUM: 653
VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: 0.425 0.426 0.435 0.435 0.435
V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: 0.325 0.326 0.335 0.335 0.335
LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A A A A
REMARKS:

Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT


Change in v/c due to project: 0.000 ∆v/c after mitigation: 0.000
Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A

12/15/2016-11:06 PM 1 CMA-Balboa&Superior-Citronia
Level of Service Workheet
(Circular 212 Method)
I/S #: North-South Street: Hayvenhurst Ave. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date:
East-West Street: Lassen St. Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa
No. of Phases 2 2 2 2 2
Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? 0 0 0 0 0
Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3?
NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0
EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0
ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? 2 2 2 2 2
Override Capacity 0 0 0 0 0
EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION
MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane
Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume
Left 111 1 111 2 113 113 0 113 1 113 2 115 1 115 0 115 1 115
NORTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 442 1 255 0 442 255 11 462 1 265 0 462 1 265 0 462 1 265
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 67 0 67 0 67 67 0 68 0 68 0 68 0 68 0 68 0 68
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 84 1 84 0 84 84 0 86 1 86 0 86 1 86 0 86 1 86
SOUTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 785 1 505 0 785 506 12 813 1 521 0 813 1 522 0 813 1 522
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 224 0 224 2 226 226 0 228 0 228 2 230 0 230 0 230 0 230
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 88 1 88 2 90 90 0 90 1 90 2 92 1 92 0 92 1 92
EASTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 873 2 437 8 881 441 0 890 2 445 8 898 2 449 0 898 2 449
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 115 1 60 2 117 61 0 117 1 61 2 119 1 62 0 119 1 62
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 119 1 119 0 119 119 0 121 1 121 0 121 1 121 0 121 1 121
WESTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 1340 2 670 8 1348 674 0 1367 2 684 8 1375 2 688 0 1375 2 688
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 124 1 82 0 124 82 0 126 1 83 0 126 1 83 0 126 1 83
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0
North-South: 616 North-South: 619 North-South: 634 North-South: 637 North-South: 637
CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 758 East-West: 764 East-West: 774 East-West: 780 East-West: 780
SUM: 1374 SUM: 1383 SUM: 1408 SUM: 1417 SUM: 1417
VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: 0.916 0.922 0.939 0.945 0.945
V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: 0.816 0.822 0.839 0.845 0.845
LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): D D D D D
REMARKS:

Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT


Change in v/c due to project: 0.006 ∆v/c after mitigation: 0.006
Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A

12/16/2016-3:22 AM 1 CMA-Hayvenhurst&Lassen
Level of Service Workheet
(Circular 212 Method)
I/S #: North-South Street: Hayvenhurst Ave. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date:
East-West Street: Lassen St. Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa
No. of Phases 4 4 4 4 4
Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? 0 0 0 0 0
Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3?
NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0
EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0
ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? 2 2 2 2 2
Override Capacity 0 0 0 0 0
EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION
MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane
Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume
Left 82 1 82 2 84 84 0 84 1 84 2 86 1 86 0 86 1 86
NORTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 689 1 393 0 689 393 8 711 1 405 0 711 1 405 0 711 1 405
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 96 0 96 0 96 96 0 98 0 98 0 98 0 98 0 98 0 98
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 50 1 50 0 50 50 0 51 1 51 0 51 1 51 0 51 1 51
SOUTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 315 1 207 0 315 208 8 329 1 215 0 329 1 216 0 329 1 216
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 99 0 99 2 101 101 0 101 0 101 2 103 0 103 0 103 0 103
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 149 1 149 2 151 151 0 152 1 152 2 154 1 154 0 154 1 154
EASTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 1129 2 565 8 1137 569 0 1152 2 576 8 1160 2 580 0 1160 2 580
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 65 1 24 2 67 25 0 66 1 24 2 68 1 25 0 68 1 25
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 44 1 44 0 44 44 0 45 1 45 0 45 1 45 0 45 1 45
WESTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 621 2 311 8 629 315 0 633 2 317 8 641 2 321 0 641 2 321
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 63 1 38 0 63 38 0 64 1 39 0 64 1 39 0 64 1 39
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0
North-South: 443 North-South: 443 North-South: 456 North-South: 456 North-South: 456
CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 609 East-West: 613 East-West: 621 East-West: 625 East-West: 625
SUM: 1052 SUM: 1056 SUM: 1077 SUM: 1081 SUM: 1081
VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: 0.765 0.768 0.783 0.786 0.786
V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: 0.665 0.668 0.683 0.686 0.686
LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): B B B B B
REMARKS:

Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT


Change in v/c due to project: 0.003 ∆v/c after mitigation: 0.003
Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A

12/16/2016-3:21 AM 1 CMA-Hayvenhurst&Lassen
Level of Service Workheet
(Circular 212 Method)
I/S #: North-South Street: Louise Ave. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date:
East-West Street: Lassen St. Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa
No. of Phases 2 2 2 2 2
Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? 0 0 0 0 0
Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3?
NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0
EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0
ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? 2 2 2 2 2
Override Capacity 0 0 0 0 0
EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION
MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane
Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume
Left 105 1 105 0 105 105 0 107 1 107 0 107 1 107 0 107 1 107
NORTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 272 1 272 0 272 272 2 279 1 279 0 279 1 279 0 279 1 279
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 46 1 0 2 48 0 0 47 1 0 2 49 1 0 0 49 1 0
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 80 1 80 2 82 82 0 82 1 82 2 84 1 84 0 84 1 84
SOUTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 386 1 386 0 386 386 3 397 1 397 0 397 1 397 0 397 1 397
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 45 1 32 0 45 32 0 46 1 32 0 46 1 32 0 46 1 32
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 27 1 27 0 27 27 0 28 1 28 0 28 1 28 0 28 1 28
EASTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 1043 1 598 6 1049 601 0 1064 1 610 6 1070 1 613 0 1070 1 613
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 153 0 153 0 153 153 0 156 0 156 0 156 0 156 0 156 0 156
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 104 1 104 2 106 106 0 106 1 106 2 108 1 108 0 108 1 108
WESTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 1271 1 687 7 1278 692 0 1296 1 701 7 1303 1 705 0 1303 1 705
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 103 0 103 2 105 105 0 105 0 105 2 107 0 107 0 107 0 107
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0
North-South: 491 North-South: 491 North-South: 504 North-South: 504 North-South: 504
CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 714 East-West: 719 East-West: 729 East-West: 733 East-West: 733
SUM: 1205 SUM: 1210 SUM: 1233 SUM: 1237 SUM: 1237
VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: 0.803 0.807 0.822 0.825 0.825
V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: 0.703 0.707 0.722 0.725 0.725
LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): C C C C C
REMARKS:

Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT


Change in v/c due to project: 0.003 ∆v/c after mitigation: 0.003
Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A

12/16/2016-2:17 AM 1 CMA-Louise&Lassen
Level of Service Workheet
(Circular 212 Method)
I/S #: North-South Street: Louise Ave. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date:
East-West Street: Lassen St. Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa
No. of Phases 4 4 4 4 4
Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? 0 0 0 0 0
Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3?
NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0
EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0
ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? 2 2 2 2 2
Override Capacity 0 0 0 0 0
EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION
MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane
Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume
Left 75 1 75 0 75 75 0 77 1 76 0 77 1 76 0 77 1 76
NORTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 296 1 296 0 296 296 2 304 1 304 0 304 1 304 0 304 1 304
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 50 1 33 1 51 33 0 51 1 33 1 52 1 34 0 52 1 34
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 31 1 31 1 32 32 0 32 1 32 1 33 1 33 0 33 1 33
SOUTHBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 144 1 144 0 144 144 2 149 1 149 0 149 1 149 0 149 1 149
Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Right 38 1 0 0 38 0 0 39 1 0 0 39 1 0 0 39 1 0
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 81 1 81 0 81 81 0 83 1 83 0 83 1 83 0 83 1 83
EASTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 1376 1 715 3 1379 716 0 1404 1 729 3 1407 1 731 0 1407 1 731
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 53 0 53 0 53 53 0 54 0 54 0 54 0 54 0 54 0 54
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0

Left 35 1 35 1 36 36 0 36 1 36 1 37 1 37 0 37 1 37
WESTBOUND

Left-Through 0 0 0 0
Through 785 1 412 2 787 413 0 801 1 420 2 803 1 422 0 803 1 422
Through-Right 1 1 1 1
Right 38 0 38 1 39 39 0 39 0 39 1 40 0 40 0 40 0 40
Left-Through-Right 0 0 0 0
Left-Right 0 0 0 0
North-South: 327 North-South: 328 North-South: 336 North-South: 337 North-South: 337
CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 750 East-West: 752 East-West: 765 East-West: 768 East-West: 768
SUM: 1077 SUM: 1080 SUM: 1101 SUM: 1105 SUM: 1105
VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: 0.783 0.785 0.801 0.804 0.804
V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: 0.683 0.685 0.701 0.704 0.704
LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): B B C C C
REMARKS:

Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT


Change in v/c due to project: 0.003 ∆v/c after mitigation: 0.003
Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A

12/16/2016-3:09 AM 1 CMA-Louise&Lassen
APPENDIX C

LADOT Traffic Study Policies & Procedures


Definitions/Requirements
APPENDIX D

Related Projects Analyses

Potrebbero piacerti anche