Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
BREAKTHROUGH
INNOVATION
REPORT
JUNE 2016
Based on our many client conversations, we are confident that few will
dispute we are managing through an era of unprecedented change and
challenge. There is less room for missteps—and a greater need for
leadership.
The challenge is, without a doubt, surmountable. We have never had the
benefit of better innovation knowledge or better innovation tools than
we do today, and we need to put them all to work—right now.
EDDIE YOON
Principal, The Cambridge Group;
Co-Author
NIELSEN
2016
BREAKTHROUGH INNOVATION
WINNERS
RELEVANCE
Generate a minimum of $50 million in
NEXIUM® 24HR GIOVANNI RANA U.S. sales during first year of national
distribution.
ENDURANCE
Achieve at least 90% of first year sales
in year two. This measure confirms a
sustained level of consumer demand
while allowing for some drop in revenue
during the transition from trial to
adoption.
GLADE® WAX MELTS BEN & JERRY’S®
AND WARMERS CORES
BREAKTHROUGH LEADERSHIP
Innovation may not feel like an existential mandate today, Nobody is better positioned to create the food and
because of the share of wallet commanded by name-brand nutrition companies of 2030 than today’s leaders, and
products and the comparatively small percentage of sales here’s the choice and challenge, clean and unvarnished:
generated by innovation. But if we fail to remake ourselves
in line with emerging consumer tastes, technological WILL WE LEVERAGE OUR CURRENT CAPABILITIES
realities and business models of the 21st century, we TO CREATE THE FUTURE? OR WILL WE LET
will see growth stall and margins erode, we will lose
OUR ATTACHMENTS TO THE ESTABLISHED
the battle for world-class talent, and our innovation
ORDER IMPEDE OUR ABILITY TO LEAD THE
capability, already fragile, will collapse. Our market
cap will decline until we lose our independence to TRANSFORMATION?
consolidation and industry transformation. We will join
the ranks of the once-great companies that simply failed to This is where we need to hear Machiavelli’s caution and
change fast enough. channel our inner Alan Kay. We can do this.
BREAKTHROUGH IN
PERSPECTIVE
Many successful innovations that do not meet the
Breakthrough criteria nonetheless play a critical role in
A WORD ON STYLE—SUITED
TO ITS SUBJECT
the life and growth of brands. In fact, the vast majority
of innovation activity comprises the closer-in launches
that keep brands fresh, consumers engaged and retail
customers supportive. “Sustaining innovation,” as the We like to think the Breakthrough Innovation Project is something
term itself suggests, is a requirement for survival. You unique. And if form follows function (which we have always believed),
need it every year—year in, year out. we like to think the style of the report is unique, too. That doesn’t
mean we have entirely abandoned Aristotle’s dictum “A whole is what
But as any successful sailor will attest, you never has a beginning and middle and end.” It does, however, mean we
beat the fleet by following it. The difference makers recognize that, as with many subjects, there is more than one way of
are Breakthroughs—products that expand or create looking at things, and more than one way of writing about things.
categories, that over the years add hundreds of millions
of dollars to the bottom line and billions to a company’s Too many business books—you know which they are—argue for “the
market capitalization. Another way of putting it is that three keys,” “the four imperatives,” “the five traits” of whatever it is.
sustaining innovation is fine for achieving year-to-year And each year, a new crop comes along with completely different
performance and to help prevent falling behind the fleet solutions to the same problem, each soberly presented as the answer.
in the short term. But without Breakthroughs, your You may even have noticed, as we have, how strikingly similar their
ability to thrive over the long term will be very much in claims are to breezily aspirational magazine covers.
doubt.
There is rarely just one answer in the analysis of ever-changing
The mark of innovation mastery is a balanced phenomena, although there is often just one problem. So you will find
innovation portfolio. In recognition of this broader here a report of many different sections, with many different ways of
management challenge, we have added a special section attacking our subject. The one problem is achieving Breakthrough
on this topic at the end of this year’s report. Innovation. Different readers will respond differently to the different
pieces of the report—allowing us to hope there is something here for
But Breakthrough is the big one—and the easiest to slip everyone.
out of a company’s portfolio. It is the kind of innovation
most thoroughly at risk, and therefore the kind of
innovation most in need of recognition, of celebration,
of study and support. It is for this reason that the
Breakthrough Innovation Report exists.
OBJECTS IN THE REARVIEW MIRROR ARE FARTHER AWAY THAN THEY APPEAR
In 2015, the top 25 largest food and beverage companies generated LARGE U.S. MANUFACTURERS
45% of category sales in the U.S. but drove only 3% of the total ARE DRIVING SALES, BUT NOT
category growth from 2011 to 2015 (roughly $1 billion in sales out CATEGORY GROWTH
of $35 billion in category growth) and grew at a compound annual
% OF CATEGORY GROWTH
growth rate of 0.1%.2
25 Largest Food
and Beverage
These are striking figures, and the wave of change is far from Manufacturers
cresting.
Our belief is that there will be more change in CPG in the next five
years than there was in the last 50.
While running a CPG company wasn’t easy, the dynamics were familiar:
1. CPG planning cycles were, well, and fall like clockwork. Media plans to media. And e-commerce was a
cyclical. They tended to recur with a were bought and paid for months in minuscule sideshow to the dot-com
reasonable degree of regularity and advance. circus, not the main event.
familiarity. Critical resource allocations 2. Consumer empathy was natural. 4. Data—though always important—
and decision making were akin to Boomer managers could succeed by had the comfort of being “small”
playing chess by mail. Long-range serving Boomer consumers. and generally historical in nature.
plans of three years or more were a 3. Channels—in both media and retail— Amounts increased steadily but not
relevant exercise. Annual operating were few, analog and essentially one- exponentially; furthermore, the sleep-
plans could be developed 12 to 18 way. It wasn’t until the 21st century depriving question of “Am I even
months in advance. Retail resets could that interactive, digital, social, mobile looking at the right data?” still lurked
be done twice a year in the spring and addressable became prefixes in the fairly distant future.
This was the world of the 20th century—the courtly era of CPG. And doesn’t that feel like ancient history now? Not only are the times
a-changin’, but as the aforementioned growth statistics suggest, they are changing faster than we might like to think.
Mid-tier companies ranking 26–100 in sales drove 25% of the growth and grew at a compound annual
growth rate of 3.2%.
And in a long and mighty tail, 20,000 companies below the top 100 drove 49% of all category growth
($17 billion), with a compound annual growth rate of 6.3%.
SMALL MANUFACTURERS
49% 6%
% Category Growth
MID-TIER MANUFACTURERS
25% (TOP 26-100)
3%
RETAILERS
23% (VIA PRIVATE LABEL)
3%
LARGE MANUFACTURERS
3% (TOP 1-25)
0%
Seeing the long-tail players driving nearly half of the growth, we explored what they’re doing differently:
1. They play “speed chess” by moving to precision, mitigating the traditional or distribution, so they are able to
much faster than traditional planning scale buying advantages of large firms. operate without the pressure to utilize
cycles. Breakthrough Winner Chobani, Most smaller firms actively embrace or finance fixed assets.
for example, conceived, developed and the cost-effectiveness of digital, 5. They’re “owner-operators” who
shipped a successful new offering in unshackled from the legacy analog immerse themselves in the context
six weeks. Words are revealing as well: traditions and processes. of the consumer rather than rely
Traditional firms speak of planning 3. They’re far more concerned with being on the efficiencies of reports and
“cycles,” connoting continuity. Newer, authentic and relevant than huge. subordinates to filter and organize
smaller firms are much more likely to 4. They disrupt the scale economics of the outside world’s messiness. Like
speak of “iterations,” in which what is large firms’ integrated operations the best restaurateurs, they sweat the
expected is something different. with the lean, flexible economics details that create great experiences.
2. Digital, addressable, fragmented of modular operations. They don’t
media shift the currency from tonnage have the investments in production
T oday, major CPG firms are structured to play defense—with large balance
sheets, extensive distribution networks, extended supply chains and
hierarchical decision-making structures. Fueling much of the resource allocation and
decision making are innovation incentives that encourage quick-hit small ball in support
of large, existing brands and fixed assets. Even the signature job function, brand manager,
suggests stewardship and operational focus, rather than growth and innovation.
Leading 20th-century CPG firms that not only survive but thrive in the balance of the 21st
century will make major reconfigurations to each of the three core components of their
capabilities, shifting their competitive stance to offense, even as they continue to play smart
defense. For each capability component, we highlight three elements that stand out.3 You’ll no doubt
want to construct your own, prioritized list.
CAPABILITIES
• Leading firms will look less like monolithic fortresses and more like collaborative ecosystems. Value will be more a function of how
they interact with critical partners than a function of what they directly own or control.
• Investments that increase flexibility will be valued equally, if not more than, investments in efficiency. Fixed, nonflexible assets will
be different and almost certainly fewer. Productive assets of the future will be smart, connected and flexible.
• Leadership requirements will shift. In times of rapid change, leaders who are better experimenters, listeners and collaborators
will be more valuable than vision casters or financial engineers. They will return to the entrepreneurial habits that made their
companies great at inception. There was a day when even the largest firm was a scrappy start-up. Just as global experience is a
prerequisite to be CEO, leaders will need bona fide innovation experience to get the top job.
> PROCESSES
THE WAYS IN WHICH AN ENTITY’S RESOURCES INTERACT TO CREATE CUSTOMERS AND SUSTAIN
THE ENTERPRISE
• Firms that want discontinuous, category-creating, breakthrough innovation will build processes dedicated to those outcomes
(offense). They will maintain a separate innovation process for sustaining the current business (defense).
• Firms will innovate around experiences more than products, leading to innovation processes looking very different than they do
today. Bellisio Foods’ director of R&D, Kimberly Mikaliunas, illustrates the point with the Chili’s at Home launch: “This country
recently went through a culinary renaissance—food channels, food magazines, social-media clips. Emphasis shifted from food
to the dining experience. Our winning launch brought new, younger and lapsed users into the frozen category to try the Chili’s
experience. We also offered loyal restaurant patrons a new, at-home way to enjoy the Chili’s experience.”
• Talent recruiting and development processes will evolve to enable firms to compete for the best and brightest minds, because
technology and innovation will be integral to how successful companies operate.
> PRIORITIES
FORMAL AND INFORMAL GUARDRAILS, INCLUDING INCENTIVE STRUCTURES, MARGIN REQUIREMENTS,
RESOURCE ALLOCATION RULES, HIRING AND PROMOTION CRITERIA AND COMMITMENTS TO
SHAREHOLDERS
• Innovation failure will be valued as providing essential learning. Much of what passes for
“embracing risk” today is lip service unsupported by organizational reward structures or
METRICS MATTER:
cultures. Ben & Jerry’s actually launched a version of their Breakthrough-winning “Cores”
Leading firms will measure
ice cream in 2002, but it failed to gain traction. However, the lessons learned and applied
share of growth (offense) in
paved the way for this year’s Breakthrough Winner.
addition to share of market
(defense). They will abandon • Leaders will protect the “explorers” and ensure that the capabilities that sustain the
misguided activity metrics current business don’t kill the projects that will create the future business. This entails
such as “percentage of sales pressing the frontiers of knowledge and embracing the unknown, unfamiliar and
from new products,” which uncertain.
tends to miscategorize (and • Leaders will ensure that balanced innovation portfolios are real—recognizing that absent
reward) waste as if it were senior involvement, efforts steadily shift to the close-in, familiar, quick-hit projects.
innovation.
THINK
AMONG THE FEW UNDERDISCUSSED TALENTS OF THE LEGENDARY STEVE JOBS
was his ability to be at once passionately persistent and open to changing his mind
almost instantaneously when presented with compelling, alternative arguments. This
quality may well be the one that CPG executives need to channel most as they push
into a future that is far more discontinuous than it is continuous with the familiar
forces and flows of the 20th century.
In moments of discontinuous change, Last year we related the story of experiences. This is thinking like a
the “expert’s mind” can become a the U.S. auto industry executives successful innovator!
liability, because expertise is rooted who rejected and denied Toyota’s
in what worked in the past, which can manufacturing superiority until denial We may be navigating an unfamiliar,
become baggage in the context of led to an existential crisis. It took rapidly changing marketplace, but we
creating the future. The “beginner’s about a decade. CPG leaders might can do so with a robust understanding
mind,” in which there are many have a decade as well. Maybe more or of what causes successful innovation.
possibilities and few certainties, will maybe less, but the clock is ticking. This again, however, requires a
prove to be the smart one. dramatic change of mental models.
The good news that runs throughout
Arguably the biggest obstacles faced this report and fuels the Breakthrough For leaders who view the rapidly
by established CPG companies are findings is Jobs Theory: the reality transforming marketplace as an
legacy assets—yes, the “fixed” ones that innovation is a function neither opportunity rather than a threat, the
for sure, but also the entrenched of genius nor luck. As we discuss future is bright.
beliefs and knowledge assets. It is later in this report (and discussed
this second category of assets that in greater detail in the 2015 The body of this report, as well as the
gives us not only our sense for the Breakthrough Innovation Report), unprecedented collection of 11 world-
businesses we’re in but also our sense Jobs Theory encourages us to think of class Spotlight case studies, provides
of self.4 This, ultimately, is why change consumer products not as a sum of input and ideas for mastering the “big
in business is so hard. attributes but as services that enable shift” posed by the discontinuous 21st
desired progress and create valued century.
As noted already, the standout CEOs of the future will chart a dramatically different
course than their predecessors. Stewards need not apply. We are in need of leaders
who have a high level of comfort with upheaval and transformation, and we should
look for that experience in their credentials.
We also need a generation of chief executives willing to roll up their sleeves and
dirty their hands in the hard work of innovation. According to a 2013 PwC survey of
CEOs, 37%—up from only 12% in 2010—saw leading innovation as their personal
responsibility. Admittedly, 37% feels awfully low, but the steep trajectory suggests that
more and more CEOs are waking to the reality that this is not a challenge to delegate.
BREAKTHROUGH
LEADERSHIP
Barry Calpino helped SC Johnson Pat McGauley created the first Geoff Tanner took over innovation
launch Ziploc food storage dedicated innovation department at in pet at Del Monte at a time when
containers, Kellogg’s Special K Anheuser-Busch. During his 12 years there was a self-admitted absence of
protein line (which pioneered the of leading the innovation effort, Pat consumer-driven innovation at the
brand’s successful presence in the and his team developed over 150 new company. Geoff led the development
vitamins and supplements aisle), products and packages, including and launch of a 2013 Breakthrough
and Wrigley Extra Dessert Delights Bud Light Platinum, Chelada, Shock Winner, Milo’s Kitchen dog treats,
before becoming the vice president Top and the aluminum bottle along Del Monte’s first new brand in over a
of Breakthrough Innovation at Kraft, with four Breakthrough Winners, century. After the division was spun
where he played an instrumental including the transformational off as independent Big Heart Pet,
role in six Breakthrough Winners. Bud Light Lime and Lime-a-Rita Geoff oversaw the development of
Barry is currently a part-time adjunct family. Pat is now consulting for AB two additional Breakthrough Winners
professor at Kellogg, teaching InBev and a founding partner of (Meow Mix Tender Centers in 2014
innovation, and also holds one of the the innovation consulting firm The and Milk-Bone Brushing Chews
coolest job titles in the industry: vice Startup Within. in 2016) and developed a robust
president, Innovation Hothouse, at Demand Driven Innovation system
Mondelez. at Big Heart (recently acquired by
the J.M. Smucker Company). Geoff is
now senior vice president of growth
and innovation at Smucker.
We are indebted to Barry, Pat and Geoff for their contributions to this report, past reports, numerous Breakthrough Spotlights,
conference presentations, webinars and other special events. We are also grateful for their friendship.
Readers will probably read nothing of a “wow, I never would have thought of that!” nature in the pages that follow.
Interpret that as a double-edged sword:
• On the one hand, there is no magic required, no pixie dust to sprinkle, no special software to install, no required
research methodology. That’s good.
• On the other hand, this is bloody hard work. Often unappreciated with few internal allies and many naysayers and
contrarians (remember what Machiavelli said), innovation leaders should not expect to win popularity contests, even
as they oftentimes provide the lifeblood of the company.
The following perspectives from serially successful in the context of innovation has been at arm’s length:
innovators not only reinforce one another, they also align extolling its importance and convening periodic reviews to
powerfully with Nielsen Innovation Practice and Cambridge check status. A much more hands-on role is required. For
Group client engagements across 100+ projects in the past many accomplished leaders, this will feel fundamentally
two years. We encourage folks to give a close read to what unnatural, because they have never actually managed
this power trio has to share, because it offers a prescient an innovation initiative with end-to-end responsibility.
synthesis of a much broader body of client work and Nonetheless, it needs to happen. The stakes are high, and
research. time is short.
“In 2008 and again in 2009, we were one of the very worst innovation performers
in the industry,” recalls Barry Calpino, former Kraft vice president of Breakthrough
Innovation.6 “We publicly acknowledged our status as ‘worst’ and simultaneously
committed ourselves to becoming first. President Tony Vernon didn’t just proclaim
and delegate; he showed up, literally. We had quarterly pipeline review meetings,
which were cross-functional leadership jam sessions in which we hashed out issues
related to priority projects. By being there, being engaged and constantly playing the
role of the instigator to think bigger and make ideas sharper, Tony sent a powerful
signal to the organization that innovation mattered, that big bets were important,
that boldness was rewarded and championed.
“I think a lot of people in our industry are accustomed to hearing senior executives
extol the importance of game-changing innovation, but then the incentives a little
lower down in the org are all aligned with getting stuff into market fast and doing
what it takes to hit a quarterly sales number. Honestly, I think many managers are a
bit cynical about C-suite commitment to Breakthrough Innovation, but Tony really
defied any would-be doubters.
“By 2012 we were ranked externally—by retailers and industry analysts—as one of
the very best. We had launched three $100 million platforms, including creating a
new brand and category with MiO water-enhancing drops. We earned Wal-Mart’s
vendor of the year award and numerous other industry accolades, including six
Breakthrough Winners in four years.”
“When I met with client CEOs as a consultant last year,” Calpino emphasized,
“one of my first questions was, What are your top three new product initiatives? If
they didn’t know what they were, why they were important, and the core consumer
demand they addressed, that’s a problem. Most senior execs think it’s sufficient
to articulate priorities, but that turns out to be insufficient. The CEOs need the
initiative-level engagement on the big bets, or else decisions will be made and
resources allocated based on shorter-term incentives of middle managers—and
that’s suicidal for Breakthrough Innovation.”
“It was shortly after the formation of AB InBev,” recalled Pat McGauley, the company’s
former vice president of innovation.7 “We gathered our top 50 executives for a strategic
planning meeting at Harvard. A central part of the multiday session focused on organizing
ourselves for growth, and we performed a self-assessment exercise concluding that we
were incredibly proficient exploiters of opportunity but not nearly as capable of exploring
for future opportunities.
“I think many executive teams get that far—acknowledging strengths and weaknesses—
but a key contributor to our success was that our zone president, Luiz Edmond, didn’t
just say, ‘OK, you guys go fix that.’ He realized that we had a massive set of processes
and incentives and a deeply rooted culture that would conspire against efforts to allocate
serious resources to exploring and developing radically new growth frontiers. Especially
when you consider the massive scale of our flagship brands, anything truly innovative is
just going to look ridiculously small by comparison, so innovation has built-in opposition.
“A specific example of the impact Luiz had was in how he created his Explore agenda,
where he allocated significant time and regularly met with me and other key stakeholders
to review Explore projects, challenged us to think bigger and drove alignment within the
organization.
“Luiz was also critical in making sure we were working on the right projects. As
with most large organizations, many of the more unusual innovation ideas were
products of senior-leader speculation rather than consumer insight, and we
had to stop that. Big innovations definitely require executive sponsorship, but
we needed the senior executives to champion our process, not pet projects.
While I quickly earned the reputation in the executive
suite as the guy who was constantly saying no, Luiz
absolutely understood how important it was that we BIG INNOVATIONS
protect a disciplined process rather than executive DEFINITELY REQUIRE EXECUTIVE
privilege. Luiz played an essential role, especially in
SPONSORSHIP, BUT WE NEEDED
the days before we had a track record.”
THE SENIOR EXECUTIVES TO
Geoff Tanner reported a similar experience. “[The] CHAMPION OUR PROCESS, NOT
CEO for Big Heart Pet Brands, Dave West, regularly PET PROJECTS.
—PAT MCGAULEY
asked us, ‘What do you need me to do?’ He stayed
very close to major initiatives and instituted full
C-suite participation in regular, informal, hands-on ‘pictures and prototype’ sessions with
the Innovation Team. Dave understood full well that blockbusters need senior support
because these initiatives run contrary to every entrenched discipline and cultural norm
and short-term economic incentive of the organization. CEOs who assume they can just
declare the need for innovation and leave it to their subordinates to follow through will be
sorely and systematically disappointed. For better or worse, Breakthrough Innovation has
to be a hands-on executive activity.”
As discussed earlier and noted by Machiavelli 500 years ago, innovation has
entrenched forces opposed against it and plenty of eager naysayers. When
C-suite leaders become the voice of “no,” innovation withers. By contrast,
good things happen when CEOs systematically ask these questions:
• What can I do to help?
• How do we make this even bigger?
• What barriers are in your way?
Actions in the C-suite reverberate powerfully, and if managers anticipate a senior champion,
they’re motivated to strive greatly and do their very best work. Conversely, when the C-suite
is perceived to be a risk-averse firing squad, the flicker of early innovation dies a predictable
and quiet death. There is symbolic value in the ratty pair of Nike sneakers that Jeff Bezos
hands out with tremendous fanfare to the Amazonian who “just does it” and brings a great
idea to life. There is practical value in the way that Intuit permits managers to conduct
small in-market experiments without any internal approval requirements. A CEO who
wants innovation should work hard to be known as the leader who asks, “What if . . . ?”
This is an unnatural act for executives trained to act decisively, know the answer and drive
the quarterly number. The perception is that such leadership demonstrations inspire
confidence, and in certain instances, this may be true. However, successful leaders of
systematically successful innovation organizations loosen their grip on certainty and find
comfort in the honesty of not knowing. The certainty that managers need from CEOs flows
from the conviction that the future needs to be created and that past practices and present
profit engines will not be allowed to impede the vital work of the innovator. Furthermore,
as managers chart new territories, they need to believe their CEO will be there, breaking
trail and covering their backs.
“Well before President Tony Vernon engaged in our quarterly innovation pipeline meetings
at Kraft, we had a three-tier system for organizing our initiatives,” Calpino explained. “The
reality, however, was that virtually all of our initiatives were tier-three incremental
improvements with only the occasional tier-two category-expanding idea. Tier
one was basically a null set unless we fudged and bumped things in there for the
optics rather than the substance.
“When Tony showed up, all he wanted to hear about was the tier ones,
and he wanted the substance, not the spin. Unsurprisingly, the forces
that continuously conspire to make big ideas conform to established
processes and production lines and ways of working were offset by Tony’s
insistence that we invest in true breakthrough work. When you know the
president is going to ask you about the progress on your tier-one initiatives, well,
that’s definitely what you put your time and money against.”
“Early in my career, I was an innovation leader at SC Johnson when Fisk Johnson was relatively
new at the helm and the legend of Sam Johnson loomed large,” Calpino recalled. “Fisk had
inherited and shared his father’s deep and real commitment to innovation. The family’s
intense commitment ran strongly through the company’s senior leadership, including CEO
Bill Perez. Bill’s leadership was hands-on and open-minded. He not only wanted to lead,
he wanted to learn and improve. One of the projects Bill devised was to divide marketing
and R&D managers and senior execs into three cross-functional teams to analyze decision
making, resource allocation, team composition, insight generation and other key variables
related to three discrete sample sets. One team focused on our most successful launches. A
second team—the one nobody wanted and I was on—analyzed our unsuccessful launches.
The third team looked at some of the best innovation organizations in the world across a
variety of industries.
“So what did we learn from our study project at SCJ? Every success we found had an active
senior-executive champion. This was someone in the C-suite or divisional president with
[profit-and-loss] authority. There were no exceptions to this finding across all three of the
study sets. By contrast, among our failed launches at SCJ, none of them had that level of
senior leadership. The initiatives failed primarily because of cuts and compromises, not
because the core ideas were bad.”
The most valuable innovation ideas are ideas that open new categories or expand existing
ones. Generally they break accepted category definitions and, consequently, tend to challenge
internal organizational processes, incentives and mental models. Big ideas cross disciplines
and integrate seemingly disparate fields—product science, manufacturing technology, pricing,
packaging, finance, media and retail activation, to name a few domains. It’s almost a certainty
that the more unexpected the idea, the more natural enemies the idea will find internally. It’s
not personal; it’s a reflection of incentives and established priorities.
If senior leaders expect their organizations to seek, develop and commercialize deeply
creative ideas that challenge the status quo, then these same senior leaders need to be
at the forefront of pushing boundaries, bringing outside perspectives into the
company, challenging assumptions and cultivating a playfulness that fuels
imagination. Successful innovation executives publicly recognize and reward
lateral thinking and managers who keep fragile insights whole rather than
dilute or distort them in the interest of complying with established beliefs and
practices. And yes, sometimes cherished timelines need to be adjusted in the
interest of getting it right.
Many readers may push back, saying, “In our company, timelines are
nonnegotiable.” That’s exactly the point: C-level involvement is required to
ensure that ideas aren’t sacrificed in the interest of timelines. The launch of
Butterfinger Peanut Butter Cups was delayed eight months in order to get
every detail right, for example. As L’Oreal’s Said Dabbagh said regarding the
CEO support for 2015 Breakthrough Winner Advanced Haircare, “There was
always a sense of urgency, but it was urgency in getting it perfect.” That’s senior
leadership that fuels Breakthrough success.
One of the points that Calpino, McGauley and Tanner each emphasize is that a
robust innovation capability is like physical fitness; without systematic discipline,
it’s easy to lapse into bad habits, and you can lose it much faster than you attain it.
Institutionalized capabilities quickly atrophy when senior leaders divert attention or
allow short-term expediencies to trump category-creating exploration.
Calpino offered a cautionary tale: “Throughout my career and during my time at Kraft,
I’ve seen the engagement and commitment of senior leadership ebb and flow—even the
best ones. There are so many other ‘more urgent’ and burning issues, and therein lies
a huge challenge, because Breakthrough Innovation just never becomes routine. It is
always, always hard work requiring senior engagement and commitment. It is so easy to
slip, and the next thing you know, the tier-three list is huge again, and it’s back to ‘Where
are the tier ones?’ The truth is that I’ve learned—by my own mistakes—that you have to
be relentlessly vigilant, or hard-earned capabilities will quickly atrophy, and bad habits will
reassert themselves.”
• The job to be done generates the energy required for someone to take an action, such as pull a
brand into his or her life or develop a compensating routine.
• While many of the jobs in our lives have adequate solutions, successful innovations resolve
circumstances of struggle and fulfill unmet aspirations: they perform jobs that formerly had only
inadequate or nonexistent solutions.
• Because jobs occur in the flow of daily life, the circumstance is the essential unit of innovation
work—not customer characteristics, product attributes, new technology, or trends.
$
$$ 40
LBS
Smells like the cat box needs These small bags are
changing... ugh! Out of litter, again. such a waste of money. Back to the store... again... [sigh] I can’t even lift them.
• Innovation initiatives that are organized to resolve well-defined yet poorly performed jobs proceed with
purpose and efficiency. Conversely, initiatives untethered to specific jobs lack meaning and proceed
haphazardly, if at all.
• Viewing the marketplace through the lens of consumers’ jobs to be done redefines categories (typically far
larger than conventionally envisioned) and reframes competitors (typically more numerous and diverse than
conventionally considered).
• Jobs Theory focuses the insight process on the search for circumstances of struggle, unmet aspirations, and
pools of nonconsumption. Demand Driven Insights identify poorly performed jobs.
• Jobs Theory creates a shared purpose and common language that facilitates communication and integration
across diverse functional areas. A well-defined job enables efficient development as well as in-market success.
CRITERIA SOLUTION
Lighter
%
50HTER
purr...
weight? purr
ia S
ter AY LIG
cri ALW ance
t 0HT%
are ums 5 ER
LIG
c
cir cific
e
sp TT
ER
LI
Wow! It’s like they’ve
been reading my mind. All the strength, half the weight.
The criteria that people apply The functional, emotional Breakthrough Winners nail poorly performed jobs:
in evaluating “job candidates” and social dimensions of All the strength, half the weight.
(i.e., potential solutions). benefit that collectively
constitute the ideal solution
Understanding the job for the job: the “job spec,”
dramatically reconfigures or blueprint for successful
category structure and innovation.
competitors. For a given job,
consumers regularly consider
an array of solutions that
extends well beyond a given
store aisle—and often beyond
the store as well.
Remember: criteria are always
circumstance specific.
95%
NAME
PRODUCT NAME
BENEFIT
70% NAME
NAME
NAME
80% REASON TO
BELIEVE
CONSUMER
INSIGHT
*
Based on an analysis of more than 600 concepts from 40 clients across 30 countries and 60 categories. Concepts were coded by a panel of experts.
†
Many factors have been shown to contribute to concept success, including: collaborative ideation, testing a wide range of ideas with consumers, and conveying key messages in a
clear, focused way.
‡
Data based on Nielsen’s Factors for Success concept testing framework, which is highly predictive of in-market success.
HIGH
Economic Value
BREAKTHROUGH LEADERSHIP
myopically on breakthrough
efficiency metrics leadership places
Learning Value
Learning Value
LOW
Economic Value
Use this framework to map actual innovation initiatives. What questions, insights or opportunities for improvement emerge?
ven as we strive for and celebrate blockbuster reframe and refresh, to name a few. Three-bucket
innovation success, not all innovations can be segmentations are the most popular, though we work
“breakthrough,” nor should they be, as we noted with clients who reduce to two and others who expand to
at the beginning of this report. Innovation portfolios four. Whatever we call it and however we slice it, we need
must balance the need to keep existing brands fresh—to to “future-proof” and better align our portfolios to meet
drive growth today—with the very different challenge of current, latent and emerging demand of an ever-changing
redefining the marketplace with products that drive growth set of consumers and their needs.
tomorrow.
TIER 1 – CATEGORY CREATION & TRANSFORMATION
Reflecting this reality, most companies categorize new
TIER 2 – BRAND EXTENSION & EXPANSION
product initiatives using segmentations such as tiers one,
TIER 3 – REFRESHES
two and three; gold, silver and bronze; or breakthrough,
PORTFOLIO PROBLEMS
CPG new-product activity is very high, but less than 20% of initiatives generate greater than $10 million in year-one retail
sales, and 54% produce $3 million or less. Given the urgency to grow and the considerable expense associated with every
innovation initiative, these results are alarming.
$10M+ <$1M
$3-10M $1-3M
should enable a desired experience for consumers. Each Discontinuous innovations, by contrast, tend to create
tier demands a distinct process by which it proceeds from unfamiliar challenges for existing processes and expertise.
idea to launch. Additionally, organizational incentives and resource
allocation rules are specifically designed to discourage
IN TERMS OF ALIGNING INITIATIVES WITH investments in activities that do not improve operating
APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES, THERE IS A efficiencies by leveraging existing capabilities. Discontinuous
BASIC LITMUS TEST MANAGERS CAN APPLY: CAN WE innovation is the work of explorers, not exploiters, to borrow
TRUST THE EXISTING PROCESSES AND INCENTIVES the AB InBev terminology. Managers need a distinct mind-
TO DEVELOP THIS INITIATIVE FAITHFULLY AND FULLY, set, asking questions such as: How big can we make this?
OR WILL THE ESTABLISHED STRUCTURES BEND THE What needs to be true in order for this to succeed?
INITIATIVE INTO CONFORMITY?
Capital expenditures, longer development horizons and
The sustaining innovations that keep our current business sustained marketing support should be expected. Category
strong typically align with the processes and priorities of expansion, sustained growth and follow-on platform
our established businesses. These projects will leverage extensions also should be expected. To expect all of these
existing assets and know-how, require relatively little changes to flow from the same processes and incentives—
investment, demand little explanation to our retail and managers—that drive sustaining improvements and
partners, and provide a return measured in months, not this quarter’s number is foolhardy, yet this is too often the
years. As noted previously, because too many initiatives industry reality.
are being ushered through the stage gates with inadequate
consumer validation, the process even for the lower-tier THE RESULT OF A ONE-SIZE-FITS-ALL APPROACH
sustaining innovations is not performing as it must. Once TO INNOVATION DEVELOPMENT IS TREMENDOUS
we scrub our pipelines of these “innovations without a AND SYSTEMATIC WASTE—AS WELL AS THE
cause” (to borrow language from the 1955 James Dean COMPOUNDED OPPORTUNITY COST. WHEN SENIOR
classic), these initiatives should accelerate through LEADERS WRING THEIR HANDS OVER THE THREATS
the development and assessment stages expeditiously, OF NIMBLE UPSTARTS, THEY GENERALLY DO SO
supported by efficient use of innovation science and WHILE NEGLECTING THE EXPONENTIALLY MORE
predictive analytics. DESTRUCTIVE FORCES DESIGNED RIGHT INTO THEIR
OWN PROCESSES.
A BALANCED-PORTFOLIO DIAGNOSTIC
All initiatives, sustaining and discontinuous, should have a areas in which conscious effort and concrete steps need
clear purpose answering these basic tests: to be taken in order to make the promise of a balanced
innovation portfolio a reality. Is this a comprehensive
• Does this offering enable desired progress in my checklist ensuring success? By no means. But if you get
customer’s life? these items right, you’ll be thinking and acting like a
• Does it resolve a struggling circumstance? balanced-portfolio innovator.
• Does it do a job better than what consumers hire
today? You’ll want to devise the list that’s right for your
organization, but these are some of the major elements
Beyond these common core values, we’ve identified seven requiring differential management:
LOCUS OF Be impatient for hitting timelines, Be impatient for perfection. Nail the job. Make
IMPATIENCE budgets and forecasts. no compromise to the demand-driven insight
in the faithful, painstaking development and
activation of your commercial offering.
ROLE OF Keep the trains on time and on budget while Design the gates and action standards that
STAGE GATES ensuring initiatives are additive to consumers are appropriate for each individual initiative.
and the full portfolio, never assuming that At each step of development, ask: Are we
“close-in” means low risk. Use predictive staying true to the insight? How can we
analytics to guide decisions. make this initiative even bigger, even better?
SENIOR Senior leaders can safely delegate decisions These initiatives fail without a senior
SPONSORSHIP to the team and process, applying established champion and protector.
priorities and resource allocation rules.
TEAM Modular handoffs from function to function Functional interfaces are interdependent and
STRUCTURE maximize efficiency with no loss of fidelity to require integrated, cross-functional teams
the core idea. collaborating from inception throughout
development and launch.
INCENTIVES Established incentives align for Consciously liberate managers from the
effective development. strictures of short-term mandates. Proper
incentives need to be custom-crafted for
discontinuous innovations to flourish.
METRICS Assess potential using the natural metrics for Nothing—repeat, nothing—systematically kills
sales and margin that organizations have in discontinuous innovations like return on assets
place for ongoing operations. Adhere to them. and similar efficiency metrics. Discontinuous
efforts should deliver strategic (as well as
economic) benefits. Share of growth is typically a
more relevant measure than share of market.
IN-MARKET Provide sufficient execution support to Commit to best-in-class support and execution
SUPPORT achieve goals, while leveraging proven and to drive Reach, Resonance and Reaction to
cost-effective sales and marketing elements. make the launch as big as it can be and sustain
HORIZON
into years two, three and beyond.
Until senior leaders begin to finance, staff, develop and evaluate fundamentally different types of innovation in appropriately
differentiated ways, balanced, high-performance innovation portfolios will prove elusive and mythical. A culture of innovation
success requires leaders to push their organizations to think differently and act differently. It’s the only way to perform differently.
This is not to play soothsayer or futurist but to underscore that the future will be
created by those who harness the energy of the entrepreneur and the power of
innovation. We look forward to assisting those who want to lead.
There is little doubt that the accelerating pace of change will have leaders and
laggards. Laggards will find little margin and tight windows to regain footing
before they tilt toward irrelevance and extinction. Leaders will create a future in
which opportunities abound, if only because of the creative opportunities afforded
by the relentless advance of technology and the inherent creativity of the human
spirit. Organizations that can harness and nurture both—the technology and the
creativity—will define the future, and we are confident that it will be a remarkable,
exciting place.
A final thought to consider as you read the following stories: If we were to add a subtitle
to the Spotlight section, it would be “Breakthrough Data.”
Confusing? Crazy?
The point is that the insights powering Breakthrough Innovation are stories, not
statistics. Stories are data.
Stories not only captivate Spotlight readers but also align teams and propel
development processes that retain fidelity to the insight. As Kraft Heinz’s senior director
of marketing, Geoff Feil, said in the context of 2015 Winner Lunchables Uploaded,
“It’s amazing how many meetings we didn’t have to have.” The data that provides the
aligning clarity is a simple, compelling story of a consumer struggling to make progress
in a specific circumstance—and every Breakthrough Winner has such a story at its core.
So enjoy this year’s amazing class of Spotlights. We hope that as you finish the report,
you will feel inspired to seek out compelling moments of struggle in your customers’
lives. That’s how you’ll begin your own breakthrough journey.
This report is the product of a great team, working together, against deadlines, with
impossible authors—while never missing a beat in their day jobs.
Thank you!
SPOTLIGHT #2
BAI
SPOTLIGHT #3
BREYERS® GELATO INDULGENCESTM
SPOTLIGHT #4
BUTTERFINGER® PEANUT BUTTER CUPS
SPOTLIGHT #5
CHOBANI FLIPTM
SPOTLIGHT #6
DOLE® CHOPPED SALAD KITS
SPOTLIGHT #7
MILK-BONE® BRUSHING CHEWS®
SPOTLIGHT #8
NASACORT® ALLERGY 24HR
SPOTLIGHT #9
OSCAR MAYER P3
SPOTLIGHT #10
SALLY HANSEN® MIRACLE GELTM
SPOTLIGHT #11
SKINNYPOP® POPCORN
SOMETIMES IT TAKES AN “IMPOSSIBLE” QUESTION “Litter odor creates a ‘glass ceiling’ of consumer
to spark a Breakthrough win, and certainly we have seen satisfaction,” added Bryan Harpine, director of global new
this before. For Church & Dwight’s Arm & Hammer products. “Across all manufacturers, nobody was doing
cat litter team, the question was this: If price were no better than 75% satisfaction, which is a pretty low ceiling.
issue, could we make litter box odor completely disappear? This dissatisfaction led to numerous undesirable quality-of-
Despite decades of cat litter improvements, odor was life consequences, from the functional:
still the dominant complaint among cat owners. As Barry
Goldblatt, the company’s vice president of market research, “Cleaning the litter box is the worst job in the house . . .
noted, “We constantly measure ‘consumer need gaps,’ and worse than cleaning the toilets.”
there was always a persistent gap relating to odor.”
. . . to the emotional:
“I just feel like a bad homemaker if my house smells.” ranks together in pursuit of this goal, and we were really
motivated both by the prospect of industry transformation
. . . to the social: as well as by the opportunity to make substantial quality-of-
life improvements to our customers’ lives. In the context of
“Sometimes I feel embarrassed when I have guests over.” cat litter, this was one of the most remarkable missions we
ever took on.”
“Consumers were passionate in their dissatisfaction and
said so,” Harpine continued. “This sentiment prompted “The thing that happens when you ask a huge question,”
70% of cat owners to use odor-mitigating accessories. Harpine described, “is it unleashes creativity: You’re out
They bought sprays or air fresheners, or sprinkled baking of the sandbox, and now you have the whole playground.
soda on the litter. The dissatisfaction also explained Suddenly you are open to ideas that you never would have
why consumers were loath to pay premiums; even the considered previously. One of the first consequences of
best litters didn’t live up to expectations. And here’s an our expanded ambition was to engage a team of experts
interesting paradox: While it had been difficult historically to perform a global technology search for substrates that
to raise prices even 3% to 4% with a new product, the could lock in odors. We didn’t even ask them to focus
category showed tremendous price elasticity for this on litter, because we didn’t want to constrain thinking or
BAI
F I N D I N G A S U P E R F R U I T I N A WA S T E S T R E A M —
AND TURNING IT INTO A BREAKTHROUGH WINNER
“I NEEDED A SALES GUY, AND MY DAD NEEDED A It turned out that the shoppers loved the product, too, and
job,” Bai founder and CEO Ben Weiss recalled, “so that’s from those humble beginnings in 2009, a Breakthrough
how we started selling. My dad and I took the first bottles Winner was born.
of Bai to local retailers we knew in Princeton, N.J., and
made the sales one-by-one, door-to-door. The retailers may The story begins years earlier, with Weiss graduating from
have just been being nice at first—giving some local guys college with a strong entrepreneurial streak and a passion
a shot. But we really believed in our product, so we made for coffee. Spend time talking with him, and you realize he
the most of these initial opportunities—giving away a ton loves everything about coffee—the plant, the farms, the
of samples and telling people about the drink and why we history, the community, the roasting, the retailing, the café
loved it.” culture and the product innovation. And despite his years
in the broadly defined coffee industry, one thing he couldn’t
make sense of was why the coffee fruit, the actual “cherry” that surrounds the
coveted bean, was systematically discarded as a waste product. As Weiss first BUILDING
learned from Indonesian farmers, the cherry is rich in antioxidants and enjoys
many nutritional and medicinal uses in the traditional practices of coffee-
DISTRIBUTION,
growing societies. “It’s a legitimate superfruit,” Weiss noted, “but in First World CULTIVATING
markets, it’s used in a few nutraceuticals but generally just thrown away.”
RETAILER
Weiss determined to turn this fruit into a drink that consumers would love, and
he was convinced there was an opportunity.
RELATIONSHIPS,
WORKING
HARD ON
“To use your language of Jobs Theory,” Weiss reflected, “there have been a ton
of layoffs in the ‘sugary beverage’ industry. The decline of carbonated soft drinks
is old news, but there’s a broader trend with diverse drivers that are particularly THE IN-STORE
pronounced among Millennials and younger.” Weiss quickly rattled off the
following list: EXECUTION—
• “They’re trying to make healthier choices.”
THIS IS
• “They want calories that will work for them, as opposed to empty calories.” MUNDANE
• “[There is] resistance to drinking calories, especially among women.”
• “‘Diet’ products are seen as outdated and offering undesirable trade-offs.” STUFF, BUT IT’S
• “[They have] interest in antioxidants and natural foods that keep you at your
best.”
THE BONES AND
• “[There is] unwillingness to compromise on flavor or taste.” FLESH OF GREAT
• “Younger consumers, particularly, are looking for new, exciting experiences
and brands. This is true in food and beverage, but it’s a generalizable CONSUMER
•
phenomenon.”
“Authenticity matters, which is why you see the boom in craft beers,
PRODUCTS
farmers’ markets, boutique hotels and so many other businesses and BUSINESSES.
brands.”
“The initial products that my dad and I were delivering in 2009 were midcalorie,
and then in 2010, we introduced Bai 5, and it just took off. We had the black-cap
midcalorie and the red-cap five-calorie, and even though we had some super-
popular black-cap flavors, the weight of the consumer demand was all on the
Bai 5 red cap. To focus our resources and energy and expansion strategy, we
shut down the black cap and doubled down on Bai 5—ultimately just dropping
the 5 and calling it Bai.”
“I think we did a number of things that were unusual for a start-up,” Weiss
explained. “One, we did a lot of consumer research early, and two, we focused
on building ‘distribution equity’ as much as brand equity. In my estimation, too
many CPG start-ups focus mostly on the product and the brand, figuring that
they’ll just pay the slotting fees or get it into stores one way or another. They
don’t prioritize distribution as a strategic pillar. We did. Building distribution,
cultivating retailer relationships, working hard on the in-store execution—this
is mundane stuff, but it’s the bones and flesh of great consumer products
“We were growing fast, but we really built the business in a very deliberate way. CONSUMERS
We built our own ‘direct store delivery’ capability, and we focused on our in-store
real estate strategy: How do we connect with consumers in-store, and how do EXPERIENCE IT,
we make this a huge win for our retail customers? Entrepreneurs overlook this
unsexy, block-and-tackle grunt work at their peril.
THE IDEA OF A
‘BEVERAGE WITH
“Costco in the Northeast was our first big account, and they’ve been a great
partner. We did a bunch of four-day road shows (imagine a sampling and
NO BARRIERS’ IS A
shopper-engagement marathon) in their stores. These events were promoted BIG IDEA.
by Costco and invaluable in generating tons of consumer awareness and trial
while also proving ourselves to a huge channel partner. Our Costco success
also provided visibility to other chains, so we quickly began receiving calls from
grocery chains and mass discounters. Target also came onboard early and has
really helped us develop the brand in a fantastic way.”
“In many ways, we inverted the traditional model” by starting to offer the
product in warehouse clubs and getting into convenience stores later, explained
Weiss. Noting that convenience stores (C-stores) provide a chance to get many
consumer trials, he added that this channel is “appealing on that front, but
we felt strongly that if we invested in our distribution equity and built strong
partnerships with some key retail customers first, that we’d then be in a much
stronger position to manage the fragmentation and complexity of the C-store
universe later on.”
“If you look at our product line and also our source-of-volume data, there’s
structure and symmetry. There are products that pull, variously, from sodas,
juices, waters and teas. We’ve identified trade-offs associated with each of these
alternative beverage categories and offered options—in the form of enhanced
waters in a variety of flavors, both carbonated and flat—that are beverages with
no barriers. To me, and I think to many of our consumers, the magic of Bai is
that all of their other beverage options have some sort of trade-off, whether it’s
too much sugar, or not enough taste, or artificial additives or too much caffeine.
Once you see the beverage landscape as consumers And Bai has taken flight in the marketplace as well. After
experience it, the idea of a ‘beverage with no barriers’ is signing a distribution deal with Dr Pepper Snapple in 2014,
a big idea. You also see that what is often described in Bai has gone national in its distribution while unleashing
blanket terms as a ‘mature market’ is actually an extremely its first major marketing campaign in an effort to drive
diverse and dynamic landscape, rich in opportunity.” awareness. “For all of our success,” Weiss noted, “as of
May 2015, we had only 7% unaided brand awareness,
“We live in a society in which many people are looking which we like to see as a huge opportunity.”
to make healthier choices in their lives, and it turns out
that one of the very first things people change is what To bring their expansionary ambitions to life, Weiss and
they drink. It may be hard to give up pizza or burgers or his team took time to gather their fact base and build the
chocolate, but when people look for low-hanging healthy necessary, supporting infrastructure before hitting the
alternatives, high-sugar
and high-calorie beverages
[are] the first place many
people go.”
BREYERS® GELATO
INDULGENCES™
E X PA N D A C AT E G O R Y, R E-E N E R G I Z E A B R A N D,
IGNITE GROWTH = A SWEET BREAKTHROUGH WIN
Of course, posing questions is just the YOUR GELATO MOMENT HAS ARRIVED
beginning. “The path was not a simple
or easy one,” Miller continued. “Breyers
was suffering along with the rest of
the mainstream ice-cream industry.
The superpremium segment was the
only growth tier, and even there, many
brands had attempted, and failed, to
gain traction.”
B:11.25”
S:9.875”
T:10.5”
explained Nick Soukas, brand-building
director for Unilever Ice Cream. “In our
favor was a trend toward simple, real
ingredients, which aligned well with
core Breyers equity, and there was this
exciting growth in the superpremium
tier of the marketplace. But as Laraine A delicious trio of textures.
Creamy gelato, luscious sauces and gourmet toppings.
noted, premium ice cream was not
IT’S WAY BEYOND ICE CREAM.
growing, and Breyers had never broken
into the superpremium tier.”
an idea about connecting with this © 2016 Unilever logo must always appear on black
the Carte d’Or brand and focused on a defined consumer To Contact Us regarding
this Job, Scan this QR
Code. For best results,
UBYIBRP-52296
to places
Breyers Gelato
and
8.5” x 11.25”
moments
7.875” x 10.5”
of daily
J. DiSalvo
life. And each night, after
please have the
Spoon art 7” x 9.875”
of wine or some chocolate or just putting her feet up and He went on to list three essential discoveries that the
watching some can’t-miss TV. So if we were going to do team made during early prototyping, which, he said,
something successful, it had to be relevant to this moment “sharpened our brief.”
and the desired experience, not simply differentiated from
other ice creams. So, while ice cream was not the frame “Our target consumers wanted decadent, indulgent flavors
of reference, the contextual importance of indulging and but also familiar ones. Additionally, the ideal product
connecting and relaxing fueled our confidence that we delivered across multiple benefits in addition to great
could do something special that could enhance the desired taste: rich, creamy texture; luscious sauce; and a gourmet
experiences.” topping. Finally, the visual matters. When consumers
could see the product, they had a very strong, positive
“Gelato sales were small from a category standpoint,” reaction.”
Miller continued, “but they were growing. Also, in our
consumer work, we found that the idea of gelato triggered “Each of these elements of the brief provided critical
associations that were exotic yet approachable, adult but focus and also challenges,” Miller noted. “On the product
seriously delicious—which fit well with the end-of-day formulation side, we had to identify, evaluate and secure
story that we were looking to enhance. We also found that an array of new suppliers and then figure out how to
finance leaders play instrumental roles in supporting bold that superpremium gelato buyers trade down. Our price
investments in growth. tests showed an optimized business case at a 1.7 times
index to ice cream, so this is what we went with, and the
“Finally, in taking this product to market, we broke in-market results validated our strategy, as we dramatically
every category convention in the pricing and promotion grew the gelato category and the total superpremium
book,” Soukas reflected. “Ice cream is a highly promoted segment.”
category, but we knew that our focus on quality, indulgent
ingredients and the product appearance would command “A critical aspect of our category development strategy
a considerably higher price than premium ice creams and involved asking the retailers to give us a full, incremental
also avoid the rampant cycle of promotion.” shelf of space,” Soukas explained. “We wanted to
command shoppers’ eyes with facings of all four launch
“The story we took to our retail partners was not an easy SKUs. Also, we wanted to shelve with other gelatos, not
one to sell, but we made the case with four core elements,” with the Breyers parent brand. This was important to signal
said Soukas, detailing each one: to consumers that this was truly new, not just a variation
on a familiar theme.”
• “A data-rich map showing that gelato penetration
was concentrated in coastal, urban pockets, revealing “So with our product set and retailers onboard, we geared
broad opportunities for geographical expansion.” up for a big launch campaign that would connect this
very novel product to this very specific circumstance in
• “The core insight around the end-of-day experience— a way that reached, engaged and motivated our target
and that this was a pervasive experience, not just one consumer,” Miller recounted. “We partnered closely with
that existed in more cosmopolitan zip codes.” our agency, DDB, both on some terrific TV and also online
video. Our launch TV creative we called ‘The Interruption,’
• “A category development business case: Most stores and it really brought the insight to life in a powerful,
had only a few, unfamiliar, expensive brands of gelato effective, funny way. Kids were in bed, and parents were
on offer. We were able to show retailers our research settling into a very relaxing, shared moment—enjoying
that while many consumers experienced this desire a delicious scoop of gelato. And then in comes their
for an emotionally satisfying, indulgent end-of-day pajama-clad son, asking, ‘Hey, is that ice cream?’ ‘No,’
experience, part of what they wanted was comfort Mom responds, not quite licking away a smile, ‘it’s gelato.’
and familiarity, and they rejected unfamiliar brands The playful ad underscores that this is not kiddie ice
and excessively exotic flavors in these circumstances. cream. It is indulgent, sophisticated-yet-accessible adult
Hence the case for Breyers.” deliciousness.
• “We always brought the product with us. The “Online, we used targeted Facebook videos that generated
strategy of “democratizing gelato” was engaging, a tremendous amount of sharing, conversation, awareness
and the business case for category development was and interest. The video showed a couple dancing and
compelling, but the product sealed the deal. The celebrating at home—again in a way that many of our
dramatic visual—with the clear container—and the target consumers connected with. The story line resonated
spectacular taste convinced our partners that we could precisely with what we’d heard from women in our initial
deliver on our transformational ambitions.” qualitative research, and it really clicked. There were posts
like ‘Were you filming me?!’ and ‘Got my plan for tonight!’”
“Retailers also embraced our pricing strategy,” Soukas
continued. “Superpremium gelatos were selling at about Results? Sweet. Year-one sales were $62 million, and
a 2.5 times price premium over the premium tier of ice sustained media support and an additional four SKUs
creams, and this gap was only expanding. Our goal was to propelled year-two sales growth of 30%. Better yet, many
pull non–gelato consumers into the category, not suggest of the buyers were new to the brand, and all of them
were paying premium prices for a brand that had historically been tethered
to mainstream pricing. “Our strategy really played out,” Soukas summarized.
FOCUS ON
“When we first started speaking with retailers about gelato, it was a growing A CATEGORY-
niche category of maybe $150 million. Now it is nearly three times as large and
growing strong.” EXPANDING
“I think there are two important lessons our organization has taken from this
STRATEGY,
success,” concluded Soukas: RATHER THAN A
• “Focus on a category-expanding strategy, rather than a share-shifting
approach. The road might be tougher, but the rewards are much greater. We SHARE-SHIFTING
are into our third year and have yet to be challenged by another mainstream
APPROACH. THE
brand. That tells you something about how you create enduring competitive
advantage.” ROAD MIGHT BE
• “Simply put, it is possible to transform well-established, mature categories
like ice cream.” TOUGHER, BUT
THE REWARDS ARE
“It is too easy and too common to think that neither of these are possible—that
it’s all a battle for share of an existing market or that a category is ‘too mature’ MUCH GREATER.
for transformation,” said Soukas. “If you believe these things, uninspiring
innovation follows.”
Gelato Indulgences’ success accompanied renewed support for the base Breyers
brand, resulting in 7% core brand growth—3X the rest of the category. In 2015,
the Breyers Gelato Indulgences team won a Renaissance Effie in recognition
of a new-product launch that revitalized a mature brand. All in all, it was a
remarkable achievement, proving yet again that when conventional wisdom
suggests a category is “closed to growth,” innovators can find opportunity,
profit, category expansion and enduring competitive advantage. It’s amazing
what can happen when you expand the world of possibilities by asking a simple
question. n
BUTTERFINGER®
PEANUT BUTTER CUPS
N O B O D Y L AY A F I N G E R O N T H I S S W E E T B R E A K T H R O U G H !
IN 2011, NESTLÉ USA’S BUTTERFINGER BASE BUSINESS did was step back and look at past insight work. When we
was growing at 10%, the classic “Nobody’s gonna lay dusted off nearly a decade of past consumer research, we
a finger on my Butterfinger” tagline was back, and uncovered an important clue to the opportunity. We found
Butterfinger’s marketing team was pushing the frontier a concept for Butterfinger Cups from 2004 that consumers
of digital marketing. “The base business was healthy,” had loved.”
recalled Jeremy Vandervoet, the marketing director, strategy
and innovation for Confections & Snacks. “But there wasn’t “There was clearly an opportunity here,” Vandervoet noted.
any innovation.” “In addition to the prior concept testing phenomenally
well, several other factors stood out:
“At the time, we were doing research to understand what
fuels the Butterfinger brand,” added Natasha Madan, • “Reese’s was the only peanut butter cup business in
marketing director, Confections & Snacks. “A key finding town; there was no challenger brand. While we had no
was that Butterfinger was beloved yet polarizing. Its interest in doing a me-too product, it was striking that
distinct taste and texture weren’t for everyone or all Reese’s owned the format outright. This was striking
occasions, and we challenged ourselves to leverage the because there are always multiple brands in formats,
love to fuel innovation.” and this is well over a billion-dollar brand.”
• “On Pinterest we found hundreds of recipes with
“We knew that we needed to focus on innovation and do Butterfinger. I remember being struck by that and
it right,” Vandervoet continued, “so the first thing that we thinking, ‘This brand has a lot of legs beyond the bar
format.’ Looking back, we were very biased internally, 20/20, and it wasn’t until Vandervoet spent time away from
thinking that Butterfinger is a candy bar alone. the project at leadership training when he had clarity. “We
Consumers clearly saw it as an ingredient.” had to get up in front of the class and discuss our biggest
• “And finally, across the market, the Butterfinger brand brand challenge,” Vandervoet continued. “And mine was
and peanut butter cups generated enthusiasm and this: We were sitting on a failed concept, Butterfinger
consumption.” Crave, and we didn’t know what to do. I distinctly
remember presenting it, and I kept describing it like a
Carlos Velasco, the current president of Nestlé Confections Reese’s Peanut Butter Cup or Snickers Squared. There was
& Snacks, reflected on the keys to innovation success. almost a ‘duh’ comment—‘Why don’t you just call it a cup?
“In order for innovation to be bigger, bolder and better, It looks like a cup, it sounds like a cup’—it was my big aha
you have to have robust consumer insights. One of the moment. Were we overthinking this?”
things that stand out with Butterfinger Cups is the clarity
that the team uncovered around the desired experiences “But then calling it ‘cups’ brought up all of the politics and
that consumers were seeking—in other words, a clear, other questions. Could we go up against the number one?”
actionable consumer insight.” Vandervoet explained. “Initially, there was a lot of pushback
“There had never been more research or thought put into a large financial investment in the launch. Part of this was
launch; from start to launch, we spent three years. Did we the Super Bowl ad. I remember when Jeremy just casually
do too much? You could make the argument that we did,” one day said, ‘What if we went to the Super Bowl?’ We both
Suchter laughed. “But we built a sustainable three-year laughed—what a ridiculous idea! But then he would bring
support plan and crafted packaging and product design, it up again, and again and again. I think that Jeremy just
with everything consumer tested and clearly thought out.” wore Doreen out with bringing it up so much, but then he
provided the strategy behind it and rationale as to what we
Now, as we’ve seen time and again, to launch true would do. So we tested out the plan with Nielsen.”
innovation, you need both the idea—tirelessly researched
and developed by the Butterfinger team—and the support Velasco noted, “We have great brands, but historically we
and shared vision from leadership. So Suchter and do not participate in the Super Bowl, and we didn’t know
Vandervoet asked their leadership team—Doreen Ida, vice if we could capitalize. Our brands are strong but so well
president of marketing during the launch; Robert Kilmer, established that we wondered whether we would get the
president of Confections & Snacks during the launch, and incremental sales to justify such an expensive 30 seconds.
Paul Grimwood, CEO of Nestlé USA—for three things But here we had a great product with great awareness—
to make sure that Butterfinger Cups’ potential became a before, during and after the Super Bowl—paired with
reality. strong execution, we had a winning product.”
Suchter recalled, “Looking back, we really credit our “After all of this,” Suchter continued, “I remember getting
leadership team to getting this right. It was mid-2012, and the updated results from Nielsen assuming a launch
we were supposed to launch in early 2013. We knew that we with the Super Bowl ad. They were nearly three times our
were on to something but had not cracked the code. original estimate. When I saw the results, I screamed and
started running down the hallway. Doreen came out and
“We could make it bigger, but we needed more time to get wondered what was going on.
the insight and product shape right. We had a phenomenal
product, but the communication wasn’t fully resonating “With all of this—the messaging, the phenomenal product
with consumers, and further, when looking at the product, and the launch plan—we saw that this could be larger
consumers were disappointed in the size. And, remember, than anything we had ever done with Butterfinger and
it wasn’t as simple as pushing a date out; Doreen and more sustainable—a big win for a brand with a history of
the team were counting on the year-one volume for in-and-out innovation. Doreen was sold, too, and helped us
Butterfinger Cups in 2013, but in a huge vote of confidence, gain buy-in from everyone else. And that was it. We got the
they allowed us to delay and moved mountains to find the money, and we launched!”
sales from other brands.
Butterfinger Peanut Butter Cups is a case that illuminates
“To go right after the opportunity, we needed internal how doing right by the research and the consumer
support to call it Butterfinger Cups and not worry about unequivocally pays off. In this case, it grew a strong idea
aligning our product with competitors like Reese’s or feel to one with more than 350% greater sales than initially
like we were going to be called a copycat. Everything that projected. Nestlé was also right that there was room in
Butterfinger does is different, so we knew that it would be the peanut butter cup category for Butterfinger; both
original.” Butterfinger and Reese’s grew at the same time.
“And, finally,” said Suchter, they needed “a huge financial We’re excited to see where else “a dose of Butterfinger”
investment to launch the product correctly.” pops up in the future, but its debut was clearly Super
Bowl worthy, and there’s nothing polarizing about a
Suchter continued, “Now that we had the product figured Breakthrough win! n
out, Jeremy went to leadership to ask them to make a very
CHOBANI FLIP™
“ C R AV E T H E G O O D ”: R E D E F I N I N G T H E Y O G U R T E AT I N G
E X P E R I E N C E—A N D T H E C AT E G O R Y
“WE SEE CHOBANI AS MORE THAN A YOGURT “We’re still very much an entrepreneurial company—and
company. We’re a natural-food company, on a mission that’s a word that gets thrown around a lot and is almost
to make better food for more people,” said Chobani’s said in an aspirational way. For us, it’s real, and it’s
chief marketing and brand officer Peter McGuinness. important. Hamdi, our CEO and founder, is the central
“Our mission is central to Chobani, and we believe it’s component to product and business decisions. He gives
the future of food. We’re driven by a very strict food the company a distinct personality and reinforces a
philosophy that we call our DNNA: delicious, nutritious, meaningful, authentic brand that resonates with customers
natural and affordable. If you look around the supermarket, and consumers.”
you’ll find plenty of products with two or three of these
characteristics, but very few nail all four. That’s always been “Historically in the U.S., yogurt has been a breakfast snack
the specialness of this brand and the food we make.” and something Americans often feel they should have but
COST COMES IN
rarely crave. We want to change these perceptions and
redefine the role that yogurt, and specifically Chobani, plays
in consumers’ lives,” explained Senior Brand Director Scott
Bacco. “When it comes to new products like Chobani Flip, VERY LATE IN OUR
we take our inspiration from the broader world of culinary
trends.” PROCESS. WE DON’T
“We always look to more developed yogurt markets, such EDIT OURSELVES
as Canada and Europe, where yogurt is used in more
diverse ways and across a broader range of dayparts.” AT THE BEGINNING,
McGuinness added. “Through this lens, we saw a growing
presence of add-ins that were addressing consumer desires SAYING, ‘WE’D BETTER
for varied textures and taste experiences, as well as making
yogurt eating a more meal-like experience. Hamdi knew
this trend was coming to the U.S., and he wanted Chobani
NOT USE THAT DARK
to be the first and to do it right.”
CHOCOLATE BECAUSE
“The way we practice R&D [research and development] is
completely different from other food companies,” explained
IT’S EXPENSIVE.
Kai Sacher, vice president of global R&D. “I have been
in the industry for decades with a number of companies that functions as a real-world laboratory for us. We can
and across a range of countries, and the difference with constantly try new creations, interact with people and
Chobani is that we are focused on creating amazing food. get real-time feedback. This translates into the products
We have a culinary—not a yogurt—orientation. That that we create and ultimately the experiences that our
translates into having an executive chef on our team and consumers enjoy,” McGuinness illustrated. “Flip is a great
working with a diverse array of ingredients and immersing example. Is it the first yogurt with ‘sidecar’ mix-ins? No.
ourselves in the food service world for inspiration and They’ve been important in Europe for years, and there are
ideas. We also look at rituals and traditions and draw a couple versions here in the U.S., but it’s generally yogurt
inspiration for how we can incorporate them into the food and a scoop of cereal. And that’s the eating experience as
we make. We keep a close eye on restaurant and food well: yogurt and some cereal. Compare that with Flip: a
service trends in ‘high-food-IQ markets,’ looking for new totally unique food form and eating experience. Almond
approaches to recipes and dining experiences that might Coco Loco is a low-fat coconut Greek yogurt with dark
inspire us or signal an opportunity for innovation that we chocolate and honey-roasted almonds. It provides an
wouldn’t have otherwise identified. For example, the trend elevated, highly curated eating experience that is nothing
toward deconstructed desserts popping up on menus in like anything else in the category. Generally, Americans
many popular restaurants influenced the development of don’t crave yogurt, but we’re changing that with Flip.
our Flip Key Lime Crumble. Nostalgic snacks and treats Consumers crave these tastes and textures.”
such as pies and chocolate candies translated into our
PB&J, Chocolate Haze Craze, Pumpkin Harvest Crisp, and “At our Twin Falls, Idaho, R&D facility, we have a
Peppermint Perfection Flip varieties. Growth of bolder, ‘Flip room,’ which is just walls of ingredients, and we
ethnic flavors inspired our Sriracha Mango and Chipotle experiment constantly. We really focus on making great
Pineapple spicy Flips. These flavor combinations excite our food. We have a 25-person team representing eight
consumers and help take Chobani outside of breakfast in a different countries of origin, so we bring diverse palates,
very natural way.” cultures and traditions into our work, which is a powerful
source of inspiration.” Sacher continued, “It’s worth noting
“We also have our Chobani SoHo Café in New York City that R&D reports to Hamdi and not up through marketing.
Hamdi really pushes us to make spectacular food, and shopping trips. Additionally, we are still growing at better
when we have it, he says, ‘And now we have to make this than 100% with very little cannibalization of our core line
affordable.’ But cost comes in very late in our process. We of Chobani Greek yogurt products; this is an additional
don’t edit ourselves at the beginning, saying, ‘We’d better purchase or a new consumer. All of this is obviously terrific
not use that dark chocolate because it’s expensive,’ or, for Chobani as well as our retail customers.”
‘Let’s use a crunch rather than a nut to cut costs.’ We just
don’t think or operate that way.” “After our initial launch of Chobani’s original cup in 2007,
it’s been important for us to prove that Chobani is not a
“Kai and his team developed some amazing products one-trick pony,” McGuinness declared, “and generating
with Chobani Flip, but we definitely had some challenges. our second Breakthrough Winner is a huge affirmation of
As Kai alluded, the magic is creating amazing foods that what we’ve built. We never want to lose our entrepreneurial
also deliver great nutrition at an affordable price. We are spark and agility, and we want to compete and win against
cross-functionally integrated, aligned in our values and much larger competitors. We’ll do that by continuing to
priorities, and incredibly agile even as we have grown to a redefine the marketplace and innovating in ways that
billion-dollar company. These qualities are core to Chobani address what consumers want—and we’ve got a strong
and obviously instrumental in the success of the Flip line,” pipeline of big initiatives in coming years.”
Bacco summarized.
“We redefined the yogurt industry over the past nine years,
“What’s particularly exciting about Flip isn’t just that we’re and we just recently launched our new line of Chobani
succeeding, but how we’re succeeding,” said McGuinness. Meze dips that deliver an unbelievable food experience
“Flip is bringing new consumers to the Greek yogurt with 80 percent less fat and 65 percent fewer calories than
category: 46% incremental purchasers. Flip is encouraging the leading hummus,” McGuinness noted. “Chobani is a
folks who perhaps rejected Greek yogurt initially to try the company that will continuously seek to reimagine—and
category, and once they do, we’re actually seeing very high, then redefine—the culinary landscape in order to create
50%, repeat rates and buy rates are increasing over time. delicious, nutritious, natural and affordable foods that
In other words, people try it and like it and then discover consumers love. There is tremendous change in the
additional circumstances in which they’d like to have one, industry right now, and we see a world of opportunity.” n
and so they’re purchasing more units on subsequent
DOLE® CHOPPED
SALAD KITS
TRANSFORMING BAGGED SAL AD INTO A
“ C R AV E A B L E ” E X P E R I E N C E
“CHOPPED SALADS HAVE BEEN AROUND SINCE THE “These people weren’t eating salads because they were on
1930s without receiving much attention from consumers a diet or because they felt they had to,” Arias continued.
or inspiration from chefs,” said Dole’s vice president of “Salads were the star of the mealtime show for many
marketing, CarrieAnn Arias. “Something changed, though, consumers, and this was a valuable discovery for us.
in the early 2000s in the world of restaurant chopped
salads. Recipes evolved, ingredient variety soared, menu “Fueling this trend, at least in part, was the creativity
offerings increased and new dressings proliferated. and innovation that restaurants were bringing to their
salad offerings. You could see why consumers ordered
“Not only were popular mainstream restaurants such as these at restaurants and how hard these recipes would
California Pizza Kitchen and Cheesecake Factory putting be to recreate at home: shopping for a long list of
more creativity into their salads, but consumers were fresh ingredients and then a considerable amount of
gushing about the experiences. One of the things that washing, peeling, chopping and cleanup. If you wanted a
struck us in our conversations with consumers was how phenomenal chopped salad without major planning and
much they loved chopped salads.” prep production, there was ample incentive to go to a
restaurant.”
“The net result was a widening gap between the chopped “Third, in discovering the visceral enthusiasm that
salads that consumers ordered and loved at restaurants consumers felt for their favorite restaurant salads, we made
and comparable offerings that were available at retail to a subtle, important pivot in our frame of reference. Instead
prepare in their own homes,” Arias explained. “One of of coming at the opportunity from the perspective of the
our practices at Dole is to keep a pulse on food service produce section or bagged salads, we approached the
trends as a source of advance intelligence and inspiration challenge as one of enabling a restaurant-quality experience
for the types of products and experiences that consumers at home. This shift set us apart from competitors and fueled
might want to create at home. The surge in chopped our success. Remember, we were not the first with bagged
salad demand and the gap between home and restaurant chopped salads in the grocery store, but the offerings that
offerings framed an opportunity for our innovation team.” preceded us were clearly derivative of the manufacturers’
bagged greens and vegetable legacy business.
“So we had this working hypothesis,” Arias reflected, “that
a restaurant-quality chopped salad experience available “As a consequence, many early prototypes were rejected
at home held promise, but we needed more detail. What as ‘not memorable.’ They were good, but they weren’t
exactly were the defining elements of the ideal consumer ‘craveable.’ We were experimenting with 50 to 60 different
experience? We dug in, literally. We ate hundreds of ingredients and an even greater variety of dressings, so
salads at any number of restaurants. We probably went to you can imagine how complex this product development
California Pizza Kitchen—which was a chain very much on process was.”
the vanguard of the movement 10 years ago—20 times or
more. And we spoke with dozens and dozens of chopped “There was clearly a precise target to aim for: a salad
salad aficionados.” experience that was indulgent (and consumers actually used
that word to describe their salads) but not unhealthy. There
“You know,” Arias continued, “I don’t know if we realized has been plenty of media coverage,” Arias cautioned, “about
at the time how valuable this immersion work was, but salads with more fat and calories than fast-food burgers, and
in retrospect, it was absolutely indispensable, and I think that is not where we ever wanted the Dole brand to live, and
it’s one of the huge lessons from this launch. If we had that’s not what our consumers wanted either. So yes, it was a
skipped this messy, unstructured, costly, time-consuming, ‘craveable,’ indulgent salad, but it was healthy and made you
uncertain work, we would have missed seemingly small yet feel good emotionally as well as physically.
essential details.
“Once we settled on our final ingredient formulations, it’s
“For one, we learned how truly craveable a great chopped one thing to produce something in a test kitchen, but it’s
salad could be, and it gave us a very high standard for our another challenge entirely to do it at scale. This where all
product development work. If we were going to offer the the devilish details that consumers only notice if you get
promise of a restaurant-quality experience at home, it had them wrong start cropping up like weeds. For example, one
to be ‘craveable,’ not just good. of the signature elements of a chopped salad is that every
bite offers complexity and balance in tastes, textures and
“Second was to focus on the consumer experience, not crunch. Interesting aside: Paul Newman, who played a role
the ingredient combinations, as the essential unit of in reviving the chopped salad in his iconic Westport, Conn.,
our innovation effort. Again, a seemingly small shift in Dressing Room restaurant, pronounced that a proper
perspective, but one that created a much more expansive chopped salad should be consumable with a spoon. You
view of the consumer’s end-to-end experience: capturing shouldn’t have to wrestle with a knife and fork, and you
the way that the planning, shopping, prep, eating and could never get perfect bites that way. A central idea of the
cleanup tasks all enter the flow of consumers’ lives. If you chopped salad is that every bite is perfect.
strip away all the context and flow of daily life, you really
lose the critical context in which your—or any—product “Well, all of this presents sourcing and supply chain
lives. challenges. There are then increased production costs
associated with the finer dice. And when all the ingredients sales organization to develop plans for individual stores that
are smaller piece sizes, they aggregate more densely in were both grassroots and high tech.”
a bag, so the standard pillow bag really didn’t look good,
and the visual is a huge part of the salad purchasing and “For example,” continued Arias, “we did a huge amount
eating experience. It turned out that a narrower bag worked of targeted couponing using Catalina and other retailer
to keep the ingredients better distributed vertically, making platforms so that we could convert trial into repeat and we
for a much better at-shelf visual. But these are the details could identify lookalikes at the individual store level based
that can either make you crazy but you get them right, or on loyalty card data and/or basket contents to generate
they make you crazy and you cut corners, and that leads to targeted offers. We also did co-branded advertisements
failure in the marketplace. We knew we had to deliver fully in the printed circulars and digital platforms of our retail
and perfectly on the experience. account partners. The point is that we jointly invested,
jointly created and jointly benefited in the Dole Chopped
“One other challenge is that there are ingredients, such Salads success.”
as a fresh diced tomato, that
you simply cannot do in a “This is another huge piece of learning
bagged salad. And yet that’s from this launch,” Arias concluded.
the experience that consumers “There is enormous potential to be
want. Well, it turns out that much more targeted than in the past,
with creative dressing work, and there are also great opportunities
you can create the experience to partner with retailers who have
in a different way. This is huge motivation to generate additional
another example of focusing traffic, sales and profit. When you bring
on a restaurant-quality profile, them a great story, business case and
to deliver a one-of-a-kind product, as well as a willingness
consumer experience.” to partner and co-create,
we learned that our key
“Ultimately, we developed a set accounts can be invaluable
of outstanding products that collaborators in creating
we could cost-effectively source breakthrough success.
and assemble that were ready to
go to market,” Arias described. “Now, “We have now created a runaway success that is
it’s essential to note that we began the retail transforming the produce section—selling over $100 million
customer conversations more than a year before we had in its second year and growing strong at more than 115% in
products ready to ship. And we rolled out our chopped the past year. One of our biggest challenges is to keep up
salads in a way that was unprecedented for Dole. with growth, not run out of kale (no joke!), and continue to
innovate to address consumers’ increasing demand for more
“Historically, we have done national, blanket launches, but and different ‘craveable’ salads. We will continue to stay
in this case, we went customer by customer at the store close with our consumers, who are extremely active on social
level, providing customized campaigns developed jointly media, collaborate with our retail partners, and monitor
with each customer. First, we shared our research with them evolving trends in the restaurant scene.”
and showed them the nature and size of the opportunity. We
also shared our business case analyses, which showed that The satisfaction of a perfect salad, like the taste of a
we could price at a considerable premium to the existing, breakthrough win, has a way of fueling the hunger for
widespread Caesar salad kits and bagged greens. Third, we more. That’s where the Dole innovation team is setting
invested in their stores and social media outlets in addition their sights: on the lookout for a healthy shot at the next
to the national campaigns. We leveraged our extensive field transformation. n
MILK-BONE®
BRUSHING CHEWS®
C AT E G O R Y C R E AT I O N P O W E R S B R E A K T H R O U G H I N N O VAT I O N
“IF OUR DOGS ARE PART OF THE FAMILY, HOW COME around oral care generally, but it was this pivotal question
we don’t take care of their teeth like we do for the rest of the that really focused our efforts.”
family?”
“A great question reframes how you see the market and
When I think back on our successes,” reflected Geoff the opportunity,” Tanner explained. “In this case, we
Tanner, senior vice president of growth and innovation quickly realized that the $400 million that Americans were
for the J.M. Smucker Company (which acquired Big Heart spending on dog oral care represented only a fraction of
Pet Brands in March 2015), “every one of them had this the potential market, if we could get pet parents to apply a
very specific ‘epiphany moment’—and I can remember similar mind-set and a routine that they have for their own
them—when someone on the team framed a question in a oral care to their four-legged family members.”
way that just made the room stop. It was this instant sense
of ‘That’s so obvious, but we’ve never quite framed it that “For the innovation team,” added Sarah Miller, director
way.’ of strategy and insights, “The consumer tension to solve
was very clear: ‘I love my dog, and to care for my dog’s
“In the case of Brushing Chews, we had worked to develop teeth, I’m supposed to brush them daily, but that’s just not
a robust demand landscape that revealed the opportunity realistic.’ The questions we challenged ourselves with were
clear: How might we make brushing a treat? Can we make “This was not going to be easy,” said Bautista. “For
a dental chew that’s as effective as brushing?” starters, it turned out that while the VOHC recommended
daily brushing, there was no benchmark for what that
R&D director Steve Bautista, noting that the Veterinary standard was. In other words, if we wanted to develop
Oral Health Council (VOHC) recommends daily brushing, a product that was ‘as effective as brushing,’ we had to
stated, “Fewer than 5% of owners brush their dog’s teeth establish how effective brushing was first and do it with
regularly, let alone daily. Consequently, over 80% of dogs clinical validity.”
suffer from periodontal disease by the age of 3. It is the
No. 1 health-care issue for dogs. People love their pets “I need to underscore that what happened next would have
like never before, but few of them do anything about their been impossible in our company five years ago. We simply
dogs’ need for brushing.” would never have taken on such a mammoth challenge,”
Tanner emphasized. “Five years ago, we set out to build
“The facts posed a perplexing riddle,” added Nicole a world-class innovation capability. Milk-Bone Brushing
Massey, director of pet snacks innovation. “Dogs need Chews demonstrated the power of that integrated, cross-
oral care, and owners genuinely want to do what is best functional approach. Every function played a critical role to
for their dogs’ health. Yet few dog parents are addressing shape the final proposition.”
oral-health needs proactively; instead, most are relying on
costly veterinary solutions after their dogs are suffering. Bautista explained, “In order to establish the baseline
There were a few preventive products on the market, but efficacy of daily brushing, we fielded a clinical study where
adoption was low, and there was latent demand for a great we had clinicians brushing a very large number of dogs’
product at an accessible price.” teeth daily for weeks, even though we had no idea if it
was even remotely possible to meet the standard with a
“We confronted two big challenges,” Tanner reflected, nonbrushing alternative that dogs and dog owners would
“one technical and the other a commercial-positioning accept. These are the things that only happen when you
challenge. The technical challenge was to meet the claim have a company with proven innovation ability, a culture
that whatever new product we developed would be as geared for transformation, and total C-suite support,”
effective as brushing. The positioning challenge was to Tanner added.
reframe dog oral care in a human context. If we could do
both of these things, we saw the chance to transform the “Given that we needed the dogs to buy into this as well
marketplace.” as pet parents, we focused on the idea of a chew as the
Critical to the success of Milk-Bone Brushing Chews was strong CEO and
board support. As Tanner noted, “From the very start, the proposition was a
top priority for the company, not just the innovation or brand teams, and the
necessary resources were committed across the company. Further, the executive
team stayed very close to the project and helped clear a path through the
inevitable obstacles and constraints.”
“Commercial success required far more than solving the technical problem,”
explained Covahne Michaels, who headed the marketing efforts. “We had to
create a category that basically did not exist in the minds of many dog parents
and to develop a brand and messaging that brought the core insight to life. We
wanted consumers to experience our brand the same way we experienced the
‘epiphany moment’: My dog needs this!”
“Some of the main things we focused on in this phase interest and purchase.”
were package, brand and messaging,” Michaels continued.
“We looked at the heuristics of the human oral-care “On the retail side,” noted Todd Nettleton, who
category—from color to packaging shapes to symbols to at the time had been vice president of the market
understand the ‘language’ of human oral care. What we development organization, “we’d been through these
learned through our research in this phase was important: category transformation conversations before, both
The pack should evoke a high-quality, human toothpaste with Milo’s Kitchen (2013 Breakthrough Winner and
box.” featured Spotlight), which created a category of dog
treats with human-quality ingredients, and with Meow
“This would be significantly more expensive than typical Mix Tender Centers (2014 Breakthrough Winner and
pet packaging, and there were certainly pressures to featured Spotlight), which resolved the historic trade-off
economize,” Michaels observed, “but this just illustrates of wet versus dry cat food. With Milo’s, we had to send a
one of the many opportunities that always arise to cut number of senior executives to key accounts and convince
a corner when you can’t. False economies—save now, customers that our company, with no innovation history,
pay much, much more later—doom many innovation could actually deliver a new-to-the-world brand and
initiatives. In any event, what you can see today on the dramatic category expansion. This time around, we still
shelf is a pack that looks nothing like anything else in had to make a compelling business case, but it was much
the pet aisle and more like an item from the neighboring easier to get buyers to take the meeting.”
human-oral-care aisle.”
“None of this happened overnight,” added Nettleton.
“As far as the brand,” Michaels noted, “we believed “We sent full cross-functional teams to begin these
that our strong Milk-Bone equities would resonate with conversations with retailers two years before we actually
consumers, given its level of trust, quality and oral- launched, because we knew this was an idea that would
health orientation. Research validated this belief, and the take time to sell through. This was a totally new category
Brushing Chews launch leveraged these elements while and concept, but we had the research and fact base to
also extending and strengthening the Milk-Bone brand.”
make a convincing case for the incrementality of our that dramatically reduced waste, on the one hand, while
offering and to ensure we had the optimal retailer support also accepting the uncertainties and risks inherent to
programs in place to launch the idea.” innovation.”
“One of the biggest differences between this launch and The second mistake, Tanner said, is “believing that
our prior launches—and this is as much a comment on innovation somehow gets easier over time. It does not.
the state of technology as it is about our company— You may have a great system, but innovation is never
was the precision and data-driven intelligence of automatic. It’s not something you can allow to run on
our commercialization strategy,” Michaels reflected. autopilot, because the forces of conformity will always work
“Marketing communications have historically involved a to bend the ‘new’ to adjust to the ‘old.’
fair degree of guesstimating and accepted uncertainty, and
while it’s hardly a perfect science, I marvel at how much “We have to stay vigilant and stay hungry, because
we knew versus how much we believed in terms of our innovation strength is fragile and under constant pressure
allocations and decision making. to do the easy thing or the quick thing. But ‘quick and easy’
isn’t how you win, and we aim to keep winning.” n
“Having a unified data and analytics system enables us
to integrate addressable in-store couponing with targeted
digital advertising, for example. This was not possible a few
years ago—certainly not with the scale and seamlessness
that is possible today. We were not only able to target
certain consumers in-store, but we learned that buyers of
Milk-Bone Brushing Chews were generally heavy buyers of
human-oral-care products—an actionable insight for us
and our retail partners.”
NASACORT®
ALLERGY 24HR
P R O V I N G T H AT A “ C R O W D E D C AT E G O R Y ” C A N S O M E T I M E S
OBSCURE A HUGE OPPORTUNITY
CONTRARY TO A COMMON ASSUMPTION, SWITCHES • Undesirable form (pervasive consumer dislike of nasal
from prescription to over-the-counter (Rx-to-OTC) are no sprays)
sure thing. There are far more failures than successes,
and the laws of Demand Driven Innovation still apply. At Nonetheless, mastering the challenges of Rx-to-OTC was
the outset, the initial indicators for Nasacort indicated an one of the main motivators behind Sanofi’s acquisition of
uphill struggle: Chattem, so the team had expectations to fulfill.
• Crowded OTC allergy-relief category across all price This would not be the first time Chattem embarked on a
points Breakthrough mission into a market crowded with large,
• Low brand awareness for Nasacort well-known brands. Allegra Allergy earned the honor in
• Low number of prescriptions at the time of the switch 2013 by resolving the symptom-relief trifecta of efficacy, fast
“This is where our knowledge of the science intersected with our understanding
of the consumer.”
“In short,” said McMillan, “Nasacort ‘stops more of what makes you
miserable.’ This simple phrase constitutes a fact, an insight and our tagline
all in one simple set of words. Putting the pieces together produced this
aha moment among our team, when we all were like, ‘That’s it!’ The product
truly spoke for itself, and it became immediately clear to these consumers
why their antihistamines worked only some of the time “Since awareness for Nasacort was nearly nonexistent,
and that Nasacort could offer them an improved quality we knew we needed more than just ads to educate and
of life.” drive awareness; in-store execution was fundamental
to success,” Sisson continued. “In addition to having
“The challenge,” McMillan explained, “was, given the low displays, we also created an in-store video. We partnered
equity and awareness of Nasacort, how to nail the message with retailers to secure placement of video boxes next to
and connect with consumers right from the start. our product. Consumers could press play and watch a
60-second video on how Nasacort works, how it is different
“We partnered with our Nielsen Innovation colleagues and how it stops more of the chemical responses to
to determine the best way to communicate. While most allergens that can make you feel bad. We also had a strong
positionings we came up with tested well, our winning partnership with pharmacists. Since Nasacort was the
message relied on more science than we would normally first of its kind, we knew consumers would have questions
reference in a marketing campaign. We framed the and rely on their pharmacists for answers. We equipped
underlying science, delivered by Nasacort, as the enabler of the pharmacists with talking points and coupons, so they
a better quality of life.” could help consumers make their choice and choose
Nasacort.”
“Sharing the science behind allergies gained credibility,
and showing how the science enabled desired life “Getting retailers on board was not an easy task,”
experiences created the emotional connection with McMillan reflected. “They were wary of dedicating space to
severe-allergy-symptom sufferers.
Our launch messaging achieved that
‘you get me’ resonance a well-crafted
brand message can stir within target
consumers,” McMillan affirmed.
All the time and energy paid off with first-year sales of $136 million and growth
in year two. Despite competitive entrants, Nasacort continues to thrive—
reaffirming that “crowded categories” can be fertile innovation grounds when
the current options to fulfill the underlying consumer needs provide only
imperfect, inadequate and incomplete solutions. n
OSCAR MAYER P3
S E R I O U S E N E R G Y F U E L I N G B R E A K T H R O U G H R E S U LT S
“P3 NEEDS TO BE EVALUATED FROM THREE ANGLES,” more on-the-go snacking, and this posed a challenge to
began Joe Fragnito, who oversaw the development and refrigerated-meat categories—one that we wanted to frame
launch of P3 as vice president of marketing for Oscar as an opportunity,” continued Geoffrey Feil, senior director
Mayer. “First, its success as a stand-alone innovation of marketing, Lunchables, P3 & Claussen. “Back in 2010
initiative. Second, its capacity to be an extendable platform and even earlier, we were seeing a number of mutually
for protein snacking. Third, its ability to strengthen the reinforcing macro forces in the context of young adults’
relevance of the Oscar Mayer brand to young adults. The snacking habits”:
reason this is such a great story at Kraft Heinz is that it
performed on all three of these ambitious objectives. The • “As noted, snacking was increasingly displacing
team that led this did a phenomenal job from insight to traditional meal occasions.”
launch and beyond.” • “Natural, ‘better for you’ snacks with simple
ingredients were all on the upswing.”
“Habits were changing, with fewer sit-down meals and far • “[There was] growing interest in the quality of calories
and the idea of ‘calories that work for me.’” “Trends and macro info are great,” Gunay explained,
• “Protein, as a source of sustained energy, was “but they’re too broad-brush to reveal idiosyncrasies and
pervasively relevant to consumers.” surprises. Also, you can be sure with trend research that
• “Greek yogurt’s explosive growth was kind of the every competitor is seeing the exact same thing. The one-
metaphor of the day.” on-one conversations provide an essential complement to
the more general information.”
“One of the interesting paradoxes we uncovered was
that if you asked consumers for foods high in protein, “Several years before launching P3,” Gunay continued,
you’d consistently hear about meat, but in the context of “we’d been spending more and more time with Millennials,
protein snacking, the refrigerated meat case was rarely because we recognized the opportunity for the Oscar
mentioned. Meat was an outsider at the protein snacking Mayer brand to endear itself to this important cohort.
party, but there was a potential ticket to entry for a brand We wanted to understand their priorities and, in parallel,
that brought together the three ‘original’ proteins while identify a growth pathway for the brand. Importantly, we
having the credibility as a trusted brand of meat. This was kept a broad aperture for our discovery. This perspective
a job that Oscar Mayer could uniquely do, given its equity allowed us to make some encouraging discoveries that
as the trusted brand for meat coupled with its access to the we would have missed had we framed the marketplace
robust product portfolios of its sister brands, Kraft [cheese] through a narrow lens such as ‘meat’ or ‘protein’ or
and Planters [nuts].” ‘refrigerated.’”
“Our Breakthrough win with Lunchables Uploaded last Feil said, “One behavior we frequently witnessed was
year strengthened our use of Jobs Theory and grounded the extent to which many consumers were mixing and
us in deeply understanding the desired progress that combining ingredients to create snacks that met their
consumers are trying to make in given circumstances,” requirements. An individual might put a handful of nuts
Feil continued. “Jobs [Theory] has helped us focus on in a plastic baggie, some pieces of cheese in another and
specific circumstances of struggle, apply a very wide frame pack a piece of fruit, for example. This behavior suggested
for category definition, and address emotional and social that there really wasn’t a perfect solution for the many
requirements in addition to the functional aspects.” snacking occasions of the millennial consumer.
“To help identify potential opportunities,” detailed Kaz “Not only is there a hassle factor associated with this DIY
Gunay, the head of consumer insights and strategy, “we [do-it-yourself ], multiproduct behavior, but we saw how
maintain continuous conversations with consumers in key it frequently led to suboptimal, frustrating outcomes. ‘I
groups. To underscore Geoff ’s point, these conversations forgot to cut up cheese this morning, and we didn’t have
reveal nuances that might not emerge from more general any fresh fruit in the fridge, so I ended up eating a whole
trends research. They allow us to explore the edges of can of nuts,’ or ‘I’m bored eating the same better-for-
consumer preferences and behavior, as well as to form you snack every day, so I’ll have a bag of chips just this
hypotheses for further consumer validation.” one time’—these are less than ideal trade-offs from a
consumer point of view.”
“Consumers were also looking for a degree of satiety that would power them
through but not fill them up,” Feil said. “Great taste was nonnegotiable, of
course, and texture variety was a game changer. An important detail here is that
the consumers we engaged liked having a variety of food forms in their snack
because of the enhanced taste and textural experience—making the snack
more fulfilling. A combination of meat, cheese and nuts has an advantage over
bananas and yogurt in this aspect, because it delivers a multisensory experience
(taste, texture, bite) that better emulates a (more substantial) meal-like
experience.”
“The challenge,” Feil continued, “was to deliver the multiple real, simple foods
in a portable format that enabled quick consumption with no cleanup.”
“Our experience in lunch and snack kits with our Lunchables brand provided
valuable expertise in the complexity of multiform assembly,” Gunay added,
“so we began to experiment with combinations that would resolve the current,
pervasive practice of cobbled-together solutions. We were optimistic that if
we could integrate all of the ideal protein-bearing foods into a single pack—
delivering the taste, texture and performance that consumers wanted—that
we could help consumers perform the job with far greater convenience and
satisfaction.”
“As we worked to refine the components of our snack kits, we faced some pretty
major operational hurdles,” Gunay elaborated. “These are the challenges that
no consumer would ever see but that you have to resolve. For example, bringing
an allergen, such as nuts, into an otherwise nut-free facility should we launch with a mixed-SKU multipack? You really
creates challenges. We worked with the USDA to create a need to get a ton of things right, and I think it’s easy to
‘plant within a plant’ that would be the first USDA-certified overlook these details.
facility that handled nuts, cheese and meat all under one
roof. Investing in the ‘nut house,’ as we call it, reflected a “Second, and this may sound contradictory, but you can’t
major vote of confidence on the part of senior leadership run the business from a spreadsheet. One of the things
and was essential to our success.” I encouraged the team to do was get out in the field and
work with retailers and watch consumers. There’s a small
“Once you start changing supply chains and making big store near one of our plants where we’re friendly with the
capital investments and developing a new brand and owner, for example, and we’d literally take a bunch of test
working with a new pack form, it’s easy to let cost get the product over to the store and start trying stuff—with the
better of you and wind up with a product that flies off the retailer and the consumer. It may seem crazy, but I think
shelves but is ultimately bad for the business,” cautioned you need both—sophisticated optimization tools as well
Fragnito, who is now the president of Beverage and Snack as . . . a bit of entrepreneurial grit. Maybe it’s my military
Nuts. “Breakthrough Innovation poses a challenge that background, but I believe in getting out into the field and
requires a balancing between taking a long-term view of seeing what really works—and what doesn’t—with your
the business case and also being really smart about costs. own eyes. You experience something, and you remember
We had a great cross-functional team and were able to get it, but it is easy to forget the conclusion shown in a chart
this right, producing a highly incremental product from a or a spreadsheet.”
business perspective that also tested fantastically well with
consumers.” “There are challenges that, at some level, all new products
face,” Gunay added, “but given the novelty of this item,
“However, all of this upfront work still left a myriad there were few reference points to navigate or benchmark.
of decisions and challenges to address in taking this Knowing all of this, it was important to prototype and
innovative product to market,” Fragnito continued. “I can experiment, as Joe said. For similar reasons, we engaged
think of at least 10 initiatives I’ve been involved with over our creative and design agency partners early in the
the years where there was a great insight and a seemingly process, so that we would have maximum degrees of
terrific product, but somehow we tripped up in taking it to freedom for change, and we iterated our ideas to get all
market. Many of the missteps are explained by two causes. pack elements and price aligned and optimized.”
“First, there are so many seemingly small details that need “We knew we needed to work very closely with our retail
to be right: Where should we be in the store? What’s the customers,” Fragnito recalled, “to explain the product
right pack form? What’s the right pack copy? Do shoppers strategy and to make the launch successful.” He pointed to
need to be able to see the actual food elements? Does a two specific challenges:
glossy pack finish attract eyeballs or create a glare? Do we
have the right shelf set? Knowing that variety is important, 1. “Consumers were not in the habit of shopping for
SALLY HANSEN®
MIRACLE GEL™
D E M O C R AT I Z I N G S A L O N-Q U A L I T Y N A I L S
“STRATEGIC CONTEXT IS IMPORTANT,” SAID JEREMY • “What makes our brand tick?”
Lowenstein, vice president of global marketing. “One of • “What are the experiences and outcomes that women
the reasons Coty bought Sally Hansen in 2008 was the are struggling to achieve as it relates to their nails?”
opportunity to take a great, trusted technology brand,
infuse it with more emotion and expand it on a global level. “The first question had a ready answer—albeit a less
than totally satisfying one. Sally Hansen was a well-
“The . . . acquisition was well timed because the recession established brand with a trusted reputation for products
actually drove a steady stream of downshifting from salon that work, based on leading technology and robust science.
manicures to DIY [do-it-yourself ], fueling steady growth Consumers trust that Sally Hansen brands will deliver
2009 to 2011. Things plateaued in 2012, and it was clear on claims, which is worth a lot in the cosmetics industry.
that we would need innovation rather than external macro Consumers are often skeptical about the relationship
forces to drive growth. We launched into this with two between price and quality and the credibility of claims.”
simple organizing questions:
THE
“On the one hand, this trust is a great base for innovation,” Lowenstein
reflected, “but it’s just a base. We saw an opportunity to engage at an emotional
FOCAL POINT
level and to create experiences, not just deliver cosmetic utilities. This is where
our thinking dovetailed with the second question about circumstances of
FOR OUR
struggle: What were the desirable feelings and experiences we could create,
taking inspiration from consumer insights?
“Market trends presented some clues. Just as the retail nail business plateaued INNOVATION
EFFORT WAS
in 2012, UV/LED-curable gels began to grow significantly in nail salons. Gels
offer the advantage of a more durable and longer-lasting application, but
NOT THE
they have some significant downsides, which we found to be keeping many
women on the sidelines. It wasn’t hard to see why: Curable gels required a
TECHNOLOGY
time-consuming five-or-more-step process and cost around $35. Furthermore,
when you wanted to remove the gel, you had to soak your nails in acetone for 15
OR THE
minutes and then scrape off the residue. In short, the finished look of gels was
great, but the application, removal and expense added up to major barriers for
PRODUCT.
many women.”
IT WAS THE
“The opportunity to ‘democratize’ gels was not hard to spot,” Lowenstein said.
“There was clearly a major opportunity to expand the category by addressing
EXPERIENCES
the big market of non-consumers and intermittent consumers. That said, the
barriers that depressed demand existed for a very simple reason: There was no
WE COULD
alternative technology available.”
ENABLE
“Sally Hansen’s scientists and product engineers are the best in the industry
and embraced the challenge,” Lowenstein added.
“But for us, this was always about more than a technical challenge and FOR THE
WOMEN WHO
a commercial opportunity. The reason most of us are in this business is
because, when we create great products, they enable great experiences for our
BUY SALLY
customers. At our best, we help women feel special every day. When women
pull our products into their lives because it makes them feel special, that
HANSEN.
translates into strong commercial performance, and it’s also what makes our
work so rewarding.”
“But first we had to solve the technical challenge, and that really was a
challenge,” Lowenstein acknowledged.
“A great part of Coty is that we work cross-functionally reason, as I‘ve said before, goes back to our acquisition
all the time. It’s not like the R&D team do their thing and rationale and our ambition at the outset of this initiative,
flip it over the wall to marketing, who try to put a story which was to bring life, emotion, storytelling and great
to it and then ask the sales force to get the product on experiences to nail care. So how to do that?
shelves and into consumers’ hands. I think this company
decided a long time ago that we had no interest in being a “In tandem with Miracle Gel, we launched Miracle Match
commodity cosmetics company. We want to win in all four online. The idea was not only to help women find the right
segments of color cosmetics with great products, but our color for them, but to bring each color to life through the
enduring success is a function of enabling experiences that stories and personalities of seven different personas. In
make women feel special. That’s the secret to customer print, we developed nine ad units to introduce the models
loyalty and competitive advantage, and core to those and the collection along with the breakthrough technology.
outcomes is an organization that is all aligned with the Through the Sally Hansen website, women could take a
same goals and integrated across functions to deliver. All quiz that would help find the right match and introduce
of our functions integrate around the same thing: enabling the seven women who personified our initial colors. Also
customer experiences that make them feel special. online, each of our seven ‘color girls’ had 15- to 30-second
vignettes that surrounded the products with stories and
“Once we cleared the high hurdles, what we really wanted personalities.”
to do was bring nail color and care to life—infuse joy and
positive energy into a segment of color cosmetics that was “All of this enabled customers to make the experience more
experienced as more ‘chore’ than ‘fun’ by many women. their own,” Lowenstein noted, “and to express themselves
When you see how we ultimately brought Miracle Gel to on their social platforms and have some fun with the
market, you see how serious we were about bringing the amazing colors and the stories and the quizzes that, in
product to life, not just to market. total, brought a huge amount of energy to a category that
had been more hassle than fun historically.
“What our R&D team was able to achieve is right there in
bold on our home page”: “And we really made a splash at retail. We had a great
consumer story for them. We had a great product story for
• 2 steps—rather than 5—color and topcoat them. And we had a great brand story for them. We spent
• No UV light required (as is used in the salon) a lot of time with our key retail partners, and they really
• Up to 14 days of color and shine bought into the vision: why this would bring incremental
• Easy removal traffic and margin into their stores, why this was such a
powerful product, and how it would energize the biggest
“This was a transformational product,” Lowenstein brand in nail care with an unprecedented emotional energy.
underscored, “enabling millions of women to access the
same quality of nail treatment historically reserved for “Typically, new products are launched during the end-of-
the salon and with far greater convenience, ease of use year holidays, but both because of our desire to get to
and lower price. In order to match every moment and market as fast as possible and also to avoid the noise of
need, we also introduced a far wider palette of colors numerous other launches, we decided to launch off cycle
than other polishes, further separating ourselves from the and introduce the product in July. We went all out to have
mainstream. ‘stopping power’ in the store: large displays, models, great
color, gorgeous pack and compelling price strategy, along
“I think it’s important to note how easy it would have been with easy-to-understand product education.
to stop there: to bring an amazing product to market and
let the retailer and the customer take it from there. After “We worked really hard on all of these activation details,
all, we had created an amazing product that was sure to and setting the right price was a big part of the formula. At
succeed, so why spend more? Why make it harder? And the the high end of the spectrum was the $35 salon gel price.
At the low end was the historic Sally Hansen price ceiling though, and will provide a base of innovation for years to
of $6.99, which was already considered a premium price come.”
point. Where we landed was $9.99 for color and $9.99
for the top coat, or $15 for a dual pack—so you had the With first-year sales of $104 million and strong growth
two-step process in one pack—providing a $5 discount to in year two, Miracle Gel is creating great outcomes for
consumers. Sally Hansen, as well as for millions of customers. It is a
miraculous story of a tremendous breakthrough success—
“Across all media, including in-store, we had huge success definitely earning an “OMG!” celebration. n
with our ‘OMGel’ copy and engagement activities that
consumers picked up and
distributed through their own
social channels, sharing their
colors and styles with the
OMgel tagline. We have over
1 million likes on the Facebook
page and a very engaged
customer base.”
SKINNYPOP® POPCORN
BOOTSTRAPS TO BREAKTHROUGH
IF YOU’RE FORTUNATE ENOUGH TO SIT DOWN WITH problems,” Friedman continued. “We were eating, sleeping
SkinnyPop cofounders Pam Netzky and Andy Friedman, and breathing this business nearly 24 × 7 × 365. We didn’t
you’ll notice one word used over and over again to describe hire our first employee until September 2012, and we sold
the atmosphere during their meteoric rise: mayhem. From $18 million in that year and were at a much higher run rate
selling the first bag in August 2010 to selling the company by the time we finally hired some help.”
in July 2014, “it just never let up,” Friedman recalled
wistfully. “It was Andy and I generating sales, making the popcorn,
hand-sealing each bag, making all the supply orders. It was
“Three o’clock in the morning, we’d be thinking of things insane,” Netzky added.
and texting each other and trying to solve unfamiliar
Popcorn is a classic snack that has enjoyed centuries of amazingly delicious, but they were seriously indulgent and
popularity—hardly with the makings or markings of a not something our customers were going to pick up every
21st-century superfood. So where did this Breakthrough couple of days.”
barnstormer come from, and how did Netzky and
Friedman make it happen? “If this was going to be a bigger business,” Friedman noted
bluntly, “we needed a better business model, and that
“Pam and I met in 2007 and shared a love for popcorn,” would require a new, healthier product.”
Friedman recalled. “In our hometown of Chicago, Garrett’s
is an institution, and as much as we loved their popcorn— “Almost as soon as we started experimenting with better-
and the cheese and caramel flavors particularly—we had for-you options, we realized we couldn’t promote them
this idea that maybe we could make something even through our existing Wells Street stores alongside the
better.” cheese and caramel corns, or people would start asking
about the fat and calories in those products, and they’d
“No research,” Friedman continued, “just the two of us flip,” Netzky said. “So it was a pretty straightforward
trying to make amazing popcorn. Through a ton of trial and decision that we should develop a different name and sell
error, we developed some fantastic flavors. Great popcorn wholesale rather than retail.”
to scale the manufacturing or distribution. We had no year, we sold about $90,000 and were in 85 stores.”
system.” “We exited the Wells Street retail business as of the end of
2010, which at least allowed us to focus on one brand and
“It’s really pretty funny how little we knew,” Friedman business model,” Friedman noted. “We also outgrew our
laughed, “when it came to building retail distribution. Our limited production capacity almost immediately, and so we
strategy was Google. We started googling for distributors were able to secure contract manufacturing by the end of
of natural foods and coming up with a list of unfamiliar 2010. This change solved our manufacturing constraint,
names and just calling people. We didn’t get many but all of the sales, distribution, procurement and financial
returned calls, and those that did said, ‘Sounds great. Call challenges were just multiplying.”
me back when you get into some stores, and we’ll help
you.’ And we’re thinking, ‘The whole reason we’re calling The ‘mayhem’ was just gathering steam . . .
you is to get into these stores in the first place!’”
“It just kept going,” Friedman continued. “In 2011, we
“At the same time, we started going to some open buying sold $3.5 million. [In] 2012, we sold $18 million. We were
calls where local chains take ‘walk-ins’ pitching new exploding because we didn’t hire our first employee until
products, and we were up at Sunset Foods in northern September 2012, so it was literally just Pam and I running
Chicago suburbs, and the guy in line in front of us is a around like maniacs. Even in 2012, we had private-equity
regional distributor with some bags of potato chips, so investors calling all the time, offering life-changing deals,
we start talking to him. He agreed to come by our Oak but none of them really valued the growth potential we saw
Park office, which was a single room behind the original for the brand, and we didn’t really need the money as much
Wells Street store with one desk that Pam and I shared,” as we needed distribution help.”
Friedman continued. “When he arrived, we popped some
corn, and he loved it.” “Another key milestone came in 2013, when we sold a
minority stake to an entrepreneurial investor who brought
“He said he thought he could help get us into the 17 a six-person sales team. These guys definitely upgraded
Whole Foods outlets in the Chicagoland area,” Netzky the ‘Pam and Andy Show’ from a sales perspective, but
remembered. “Well, for us that was too good to be true, so all the other operational challenges just mushroomed as
we signed up and started popping and praying! Norman sales continued to soar,” Friedman noted. “2013 finished
Distributors were true to their word and got us into Whole with $70 million in sales and growing strong. In July 2014,
Foods and a bunch of other critical early accounts.” when we finally did sell the majority of the business to the
private-equity firm T.A. Associates, we were on about a
“Things took off,” Friedman summarized. “Early 2010, we $150 million run rate. It was almost four years exactly from
had the idea for a better-for-you popcorn. August 2010, we the sale of our first bag to the sale of the company, and it
sold our first bag of SkinnyPop. In the final months of the was basically one breathless, amazing ride.”
“Looking back on it,” Netzky reflected, “I think one “This year, we’re introducing new chocolate and jalapeño
important thing to the SkinnyPop story is the Wells Street flavors, and we think the future of SkinnyPop and the
experience, because that’s really where we made most of future of a totally new kind of food company couldn’t be
our mistakes and learned the hard lessons. It was before brighter. Pam and Andy remain very involved; they’re on
we really started growing, so it was much easier to pivot, the board of directors and [are] key advisers to the ongoing
fix and move on. We hadn’t planned it that way, but that business.”
learning phase occurs in any new venture, and far better to
do it before you start investing in scale and growth.” It’s as exciting an entrepreneurial story as any we’ve seen
in the course of the Breakthrough Innovation Project,
“They make it sound straightforward,” concluded Tom and it underscores that outsize success is possible even
Ennis, CEO of Amplify, the newly named entity under for undersize firms. We’ll be looking forward to more
T.A.’s ownership. “The reality is that nothing they did was Breakthrough Winners—if not quite so much mayhem—
easy. For example, while the snacking industry is moving from Amplify in the years to come. n
to bolder, ethnic flavors, one of the keys to SkinnyPop is
that it is lightly seasoned yet delivers great flavor. What
this means is that you don’t get ‘mouth fatigue.’ You want
to eat the whole bag, and you know what? You feel good
physically and emotionally when you do. There is no guilt
associated with SkinnyPop eating.”
FOOTNOTES
1. At a 1971 meeting at Xerox PARC, Kay said, “The best way to predict the future is to invent it.” Deborah
Wise, “Experts Speculate on Future Electronic Learning Environment,” InfoWorld, April 26, 1982, p. 6.
2. Nielsen data.
3. Christensen, Clayton M. “Assessing Your Organization’s Innovation Capabilities” Leader to Leader. 21
(Summer 2001): 27-37. Harvard professor and innovation authority, Clayton M. Christensen, developed
this capabilities model, initially referring to it as “Resources, Processes, and Values” in 2001. He
has published on this framework multiple times, subsequently revising the wording to “Resources,
Processes, and Priorities” to eliminate potential confusion over the interpretation of the word “values.”
4. For valuable thinking on these topics, see Shunryu Suzuki, Zen Mind, Beginner’s Mind (Boston:
Shambhala, 2011).
5. For more information on the Demand Driven Innovation system, see the 2013 U.S. Breakthrough
Innovation Report.
6. Calpino left Kraft Heinz in Q2 2015 and then consulted until joining Mondelez in Q1 2016.
7. McGauley retired from AB InBev in 2015 but is still actively engaged as a consultant to the company.
8. To read Clayton M. Christensen’s work on the theory of interdependence and modularity, see
claytonchristensen.com for links to various books and articles.
9. Marc de Jong, Nathan Marston and Erik Roth, “The Eight Essentials of Innovation,” McKinsey Quarterly,
April 2015, www.mckinsey.com.
DISCL AIMER
The information contained in this report is based on compilations and/or estimates representing Nielsen’s
opinion based on its analysis of data and other information, including data from sample households
and/or other sources that may not be under Nielsen’s control. Nielsen shall not be liable for any use of or
reliance on the information contained in this report.
ABOUT NIELSEN
Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN) is a global performance management company that provides a
comprehensive understanding of what consumers watch and buy. Nielsen’s Watch segment provides media
and advertising clients with Total Audience measurement services for all devices on which content — video,
audio and text — is consumed. The Buy segment offers consumer packaged goods manufacturers and
retailers the industry’s only global view of retail performance measurement. By integrating information from
its Watch and Buy segments and other data sources, Nielsen also provides its clients with analytics that help
improve performance. Nielsen, an S&P 500 company, has operations in over 100 countries, covering more
than 90% of the world’s population.
Copyright © 2016 The Nielsen Company. All rights reserved. Nielsen and the Nielsen logo are trademarks or
registered trademarks of CZT/ACN Trademarks, L.L.C. Other product and service names are trademarks or
registered trademarks of their respective companies.