E-Filed Document Nov 19 2020 14:05:27 2020-M-00995 Pages: 35

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

CIVIL CAUSE NO. 2020-M-995

DANIEL SHOPE PLAINTIFF

VS.

COUNTY COURT CAUSE NO. 18-2329

THE APPEAL TO THE CIRCUIT COURT HAS A
DIFFERENT CASE NUMBER

Dr. MICHAEL WINKELMANN,et.al DEFENDANTS

and his personal capacity;
and NEWSOUTH NEUROSPINE

________________________________________________________________________
EMERGENCY MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE
FOR THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT TO CAUSE/DEMAND JUDGE
KENT MCDANIEL, AND RANKIN COUNTY CLERK BECKY BOYD
OBEY THE RULES AND RELEASE THE SWORN COURT
TRANSCRIPTS THAT HAVE BEEN PAID FOR AND DESIGNATED FOR
APPEAL SINCE JULY, 2020
WHICH WILL END THE HEARSAY OF THE JUDICIAL COMPLAINT TO
THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT AS A MATTER OF LAW
_________________________________________________________________

COMES NOW, Plaintiff Daniel Shope, by and through his attorney of record and files

this EMERGENCY MOTION for the Mississippi Supreme Court to cause and demand

to cause/demand that the honorable judge Kent McDaniel and the Rankin County Clerk,

Becky Boyd TO OBEY THE RULES AND RELEASE THE SWORN COURT

TRANSCRIPTS THAT HAVE BEEN PAID FOR AND DESIGNATED FOR

1
APPEAL SINCE JULY 2020 BUT IS BEING HELD HOSTAGE BY BOTH

PARTIES IN THIS MATTER.

The point of resolution to this entire conflict and complaints filed against the honorable

judge Kent McDaniel’s, Rankin County’s Clerk office Becky Boyd versus and this

attorney can be easily resolved with the recorded court transcripts of the hearing held on

June 23, 2020 and September 1, 2020. Please see exhibit A. The docket sheet from the

county court evidencing that a sworn court hearing did take place. These said official

records are being refused for the appeal by the honorable judge Kent McDaniels and

Becky Boyd since Plaintiff paid for them as shown in exhibit B. The first cancelled proof

of check is for the summary judgment records check dated July 28, 2020, that check

shows that the Rankin County Clerk deposited and cleared the firm’s bank account on

August 4, 2020, but to this date, there has not been absolutely NO DOCUMENTS FILED

FOR APPEAL nor provided to the Plaintiff. Exhibit C, the filed Rankin County Court’s

ESTIMATED COST OF APPEAL dated September 15, 2020 clearly shows that the

COURT REPORTER RECEIVED MONIES FROM THAT PAYMENT in the amount of

$348. The next check that was written for the September 1, damages hearing was for

records that Defendant’s attorney tried to trick this attorney by designating records for the

appeal all while knowing that such designation of records was filed by Defendants some

45 days too late. But out of the desire to see legalism in our courts in Mississippi,

Plaintiff paid that additional cost anyway just to get the matter into appeals court

(although Plaintiff filed numerous of documents arguing that Defendant has dirty hands

2
and that the conspiracy of the honorable judge Kent McDaniel’s, Rankin County Clerk

Becky Boyd and Defendants attorneys Chris Walker and Hubert Williams to try to STOP

Plaintiff from appealing this case was unsuitable in the practice of law and adjudicating.

I cannot say anything to why Rankin County Clerk Becky Boyd choose this path, but

when asked and as I filed with the court emails stating she said that judge Kent

McDaniel’s said not to release the records. I swear the JUDICIAL SYSTEM in place in

Mississippi must work fairly, otherwise what could be the purpose of the Canon Rules if

the watchdog himself is the violator at will. Therefore, there is absolutely no existence

not even the [1] document nor court transcription as paid and designated. Therefore,

either there is a conspiracy, or Rankin County Clerk’s office has EMBEZZLED OVER

$4,000 dollars of Plaintiff’s money. I swear to this date I not received NOT ONE DIME

of that money back as a refund. Additionally, this case is still under the jurisdiction of

the Mississippi Supreme Court Appeal Case No. 2020-M-995. After reviewing the

Canon Rules, exhibit D, for the accountability of Mississippi Judges conduct to the

Mississippi Supreme, the Mississippi Supreme Court has acknowledged that it has

adopted the rules for judicial performance in Mississippi. On September 8, this attorney

filed an EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RECUSAL on behalf of Plaintiff but included

relief for this attorney of the honorable Judge Kent McDaniel and although the word

EMERGENCY MOTION typically causes the court to respond within 14 days, at least

from what I have read in some case law and sometimes even 7 days, (law omitted since

the Court has the power to move on any motion when the court so desires). Plaintiff has

3
been told that the court, likely due to COVID-19, simply has not gotten around to the

motion since a lot of government employees are working remote. However, there now

exist questions, like does the Mississippi Supreme Court desire to have it’s elected

judges, regardless of their title, years on the bench or even friendships follow the

Canon Rules 1, 2 and 3 in the interest of justice? Plaintiff avers that county and

circuit judges are voted into their seats by Citizens whom believed they would follow

Canon Rules, even when they do not like the attorney before them. Plaintiff and this

attorney has attached to this pleading the motion exhibit E, that was filed with this

honorable Mississippi Supreme Court, and will request that the Court consider the

already exhibits that were filed with that motion so that Plaintiff does not appear to be

redundant in information and pleadings that are already before the court.

Now, on November 18, 2020, yesterday, Plaintiff Daniel Shope’s attorney received a

bar complaint from the Mississippi Bar Commission, hereto attached as exhibit F, where

the honorable judge Kent McDaniel’s filed against this attorney. The letter from the

judge is dated September 9, 2020 and the letter from the Mississippi Bar is dated

November 17, 2020. At this time it is not clear as to why there is such a huge gap in the

date filed and the date sent to Plaintiff’s attorney, nor is the recognizing of the same

relevant to Plaintiff at this time other to show the conduct of retaliation from the

honorable judge Kent McDaniel since the complaint is dated one day after Plaintiff and

his attorney filed a motion of recusal regarding Judge Kent McDaniel hereto attached as

exhibit E. Plaintiff believes that the honorable judge Kent McDaniel filed this his bar

4
complaint out of pure RETALIATION, MISUSE OF THE ROBE WHILE ON THE

BENCH, ABUSE OF A JUDICIAL PROCEEDING BY A SITTING JUDGE (judge

McDaniel signed the document as Judge Kent McDaniel), and what appears to Plaintiff to

be driven by some form of darkness from the bench. The bar complaint as described and

answered to below, shows a era of conviction by a Mississippi Judge whom has clearly

went so far out of his duties to the bench, the court, lawyers and God knows citizens

whom voted him into that seat. Plaintiff reminds this Court that the honorable Judge

Kent McDaniels filed his bar complaint against me for the issues found in my [2] Judicial

Complaints against him, hereto attached as exhibit G, that shows my complaint against

the honorable judge Kent McDaniel’s was received on September 2, 2020 and again

Plaintiff filed his motion to recuse the honorable judge Kent McDaniel on September 8,

2020 which without any reasonable doubt, that judge Kent McDaniels knew of my

second complaint as well as Plaintiff’s motion for recusal and thereby simply filed the bar

complaint against me where he says that I am mentally ill, the law school where I

graduated from…, well, Plaintiff need not read it to this court, it’s attached. What is

puzzling to the honorable judge Kent McDaniel’s bar complaint is that he included

documents that were sent to the bar commission regarding an open case of violation of

M.R.P.C. for the opposing attorneys, namely Chris Walker and Hubert Williams. The

question then became why is judge McDaniel’s in possession of documents regarding

those lawyers bar complaint when the documents were sent to the Bar Commission and

of course to attorney Chris Walker and Hubert Williams. Plaintiff believes that some

5
form of communication might have occurred between the judge and opposing attorneys

and that this attorney simply tired of even trying to understand those things that continue

to occur with judge Kent McDaniel’s and the opposing attorney.

As a result of the foregoing, Plaintiff and his attorney has to file the following since

the honorable judge Kent McDaniel’s has acted so far out of the scope of his sworn oath

before the Mississippi Supreme Court calling Plaintiff’s attorney crazy, implying that the

HBCU Law School that I attended could not have educated me, at least that’s what it

sounds like , but instead of being dark minded back to him, I will not disrespect that seat

because of a few bad actors, besides, I can’t even to prove my innocence of the bar

complaint. However below are exact excerpts from the honorable judge Kent

McDaniel’s bar complaint, hereto attached as exhibit F.

Moreover, this attorney for Daniel Shope swear that I have Not performed any

unprofessional litigating before judge Kent McDaniel and certainly not committed any

inducing of perjury, and goes with reason why don’t judge Kent McDaniel cease from

obstructing justice in this matter and PRODUCE THE TRANSCRIPTS THAT SAYS

WHAT HE AND THIS LAWYER SAID DURING THE HEARINGS.

Therefore, Plaintiff/his attorney submits the following:

Posture of the case:

On September 8, 2020 Plaintiff filed for an emergency motion to recuse the honorable

judge Kent McDaniel of Rankin County Court for several violations of the Judicial

Canon Rules, inter alia. Case no. 20-M-0995.

6
 Unfortunately for Plaintiff Judge Kent McDaniel, instead of recusing himself and

allowing the judicial system to work as it is written, has filed a Bar Complaint, after

Plaintiff’s attorney filed [2] judicial complaints against him as well as Plaintiff filing a

motion for his recusal from Plaintiff’s case. Please see exhibit ?

THE EVIDENCE:

The honorable Judge Kent McDaniel said the following:

A. Judge McDaniel: “I was told by another former ADA and AUSA that she had used

precisely these same tactics of making not just legal threats but personal and

professional threats against another doctor who CAVED in and paid settlement

money to HER and her client. My response: I have no idea why judge Kent

McDaniel would be speaking with a former ADA and AUSA about me when I should

not be that important for conversation, I represent a client in the matter and that client

has a right to appeal the judge’s final order. I am bewildered as to who the former

D.A. or even A.U.S.A could be and to my knowledge I have never had any litigation

with a former D.A. nor A.U.S.A. at least they have not told me such a title, and why

would it matter, I practice law on behalf of clients and since the law is in black and

white, I have no need to know any credentials of the opposing attorney.

B. Next, the honorable judge Kent McDaniel states in paragraph two of his complaint

that: “I used the same tactics of making not just legal threats but personal and

professional threats agasint another doctor who CAVE in and paid money to me.”

7
MY RESPONSE: I work for clients and I can only use the law and facts to resolve

any situation. Therefore, by virtue of judge McDaniel’s own complaint, in this

sentence, if another lawyer settled the matter with that Plaintiff( again no ideal why a

closed conditional settlement would result in that lawyer possibly violating the very

agreement that he procured with my client) then I guess I did my job, otherwise, it

seems to me that the other lawyer would have written a bar complaint and certainly

not paid money to my CLIENT, not me. Also, this office practice that any

settlement monies are paid to the client whom pays the attorney, not to the attorney.

But the greater issue with the honorable judge Kent McDaniel’s statement is that he

spoke with whomever these former person[s] are about a confidential settlement and

he did so in order to bolster his argument that I did something wrong, when by mere

admission it says the other attorney CAVED in, whatever that means. Plaintiff

contend that that statement in it’s self is a violation of the very law, statutes and rules

that were are to abide by, confidentiality agreement, at least pursuant to the executed

agreement, but again I have no ideal whom the honorable Kent McDaniels is

referring to. I also know that each and every attorney that I have had to argue against

regarding major medical malpractice cases since I have become Barred have at least

15 to 30 years more experience than I, and that none of them has been a female so I

am not sure how I could have frighten anyone to settle when they work for their

client, and not me. I am confused with that assertion, because it appears that judge

McDaniel’s is saying that I did exactly what the court’s like and that is to settle the

8
 matter to prevent litigation that could be settled outside of the court, and I and

another lawyer[s],(usually I argue against at least two lawyers on any given medical

malpractice case). That said, I am glad that I can see that the law works.

C. From that same paragraph the honorable judge Kent McDaniel states that: “ some

decision, assuming he is referring to the case that Plaintiff is appealing cost nearly a

quarter million dollars in nearly TWO YEARS LITIGATION.” MY RESPONSE:

That is precisely Plaintiff and his lawyer’s point. The record clearly shows that

Plaintiff filed his case November 20, 2018 and Plaintiff immediately wrote a motion

for summary judgment on May 6, 2019 Doc.[21], hereto attached is the docket sheet

from the county court exhibit A. As such, Plaintiff sought summary judgment

regarding this matter as early as [6] months after the suit was filed, Defendants

responded and that was the first time I met the honorable Judge McDaniel’s whom

denied the motion and said during the hearing that there are too many documents to

grant summary judgment. Plaintiff makes this record that if Defendants claim that

Plaintiff’s suit was frivolous, then WHY IN THE NAME OF LAW would they

participate in the litigation and certainly DEFENDANTS COULD HAVE

RESPONDED TO PLAINTIFF’S 1ST SUMMARY JUDGEMENT WITH A

MOTION TO DISMISS, but they did not, they actively participated and even filed

around 35 plus subpoena’s on behalf of their client. Which proves that they were

either falsely billing their clients or has come to the appeals process with dirty hands

calling Plaintiff and his attorney as extortionist. (Plaintiff filed a bar complaint

9
 against these attorney fully citing proof that either defendants lawyers are the one

bring a frivolous pleading, or they have robbed their clients out of over $200,000

dollars. Please see the bar complaint filed against attorneys Chris Walker and Hubert

Williams on file with the Mississippi Bar Commission. In fact, judge McDaniel

made the record stating that the parties should pursue discovery, which is why the

case stayed alive until July 2020. Even in the honorable judge Kent McDaniel final

judgment not one time did the court state in it’s opinion that Plaintiff nor his attorney

brought a frivolous lawsuit. See exhibit H. I submit to this record that if I had filed

a frivolous lawsuit nearly [3] years ago, then why would Defendants continue to bill

their clients when they could have EASILY JUST FILE A MOTION TO

DISMISS. Even the Court itself could have dismissed the matter at the early stages

of litigation. Instead, I am now fighting to hold the client’s position and in the mist

of that fight being attached by some judges because I have sought an appeal of this

matter.

D. Then the honorable judge McDaniels states in the last sentence that I have done

something illegal and clearly unprofessional activity, at least he states in his opinion.

MY RESPONSE: Do you mean to tell me that it took a sitting judge [3] years to see

that an almost [5] years of practicing lawyer is doing something illegal in his

courtroom and that there are two [30] plus years of experienced attorneys for the

defendant that participated with the litigation of this now so-called illegal and

unprofessional activity before the court, of course not. Surely this honorable judge

10
 would have immediately sanctioned or written a bar complaint regarding any

disrespectful behavior by this attorney, instead, it was not until after I filed [2]

Judiciary Complaints and finally a complaint to the MS SUPREME COURT about

the behavior of the honorable judge Kent McDaniel regarding the unfair, unethical,

and racially motivated conduct involving me with this client. As such, by mere

complaining to the Bar, judge Kent McDaniel cannot be saying that he allowed the

law to be broken for over [2] years and did nothing, nor can he say that he knew a

lawsuit to be frivolous and fail to act on that frivolous lawsuit against the attorney,

myself before the attorney filed judicial actions against him. Judge McDaniel is

simply angry that I have asked the Mississippi Supreme Court to please look into the

ill conduct of judge Kent McDaniel and to do so according to the Canon rules or

other applicable applications of law.

E. Then on page 2 of the honorable judge Kent McDaniel’s bar complaint, he states

that “A NUMBER OF OTHER JUDGES, both STATE and FEDERAL have

encountered unprofessionalism conduct by Ms. Robinson.” The honorable judge

Kent McDaniel states that:” I received a document that she has filed in U.S.

District Court Cas No. 3:20-cv.00418-DPJ-FKB wherein she CHASTISES

District Judge Jordan for his candid description of her lack of communication skills.”

MY RESPONSE: Attached is document 19 which heading states PLAINTIFF’S

OBJECTION FOR THE RECORD REGARDING THE COURT’S ORDER DOC.

[18]. There Plaintiff made the appropriate OBJECTION to the honorable judge

11
Jordan’s order where by the judge said “ NEARLY EVERY STATEMENT FROM

PLAINTIFF’S BRIEFS THAT IS QUOTED IN THIS ORDER CONTAINS

MULTIPLE GRAMMATICAL AND/OR TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS.”

Please see exhibit I. MY RESPONSE: Trying to be responsible in practice sending

clients every document or an order from the court so that clients can participate in the

judicial system and understand why a court says what it says. In that case, I had

every right to explain to the honorable judge Jordan that my grammatical writings

might be because I attended public schools using used books and more, but

attempting to embarrass me in writing orders is the judge’s prerogative. In fact there

are like grammatical errors found in this very pleading also, but the law doesn’t

change nor has the rules been altered. I assured the court that the law to support

Plaintiff’s arguments comes straight from the WestLaw. I then told the court that I

AM A FREEDOM FIGHTER AS HARRIET TUBMAN’S ERA, and that like

Harriet Tubman I will fight for justice and equality for all even with grammatical

errors. Then Judge McDaniel, said on page 2 the last sentence that I have the

“audacity to call myself a freedom fighter,” and MY RESPONSE: just like in 1850

and 1860, Harriet Tubman had those whom were against her efforts to free slaves so

do I accept the honorable judge Kent McDaniel comments about me trying to free

people from oppression of the Jim Crow laws of todays society, and in doing so I

have made some people literally hate me and my efforts. I understand that people

resist change and following the U.S. Constitution 14th amendment rights due process

12
agitate some, but it does not change the law, my clients have a right to bring their

grievances before the appeals court, at least I thought. Surely if you have never been

homeless, strongly dependent on drugs, hungry for food and clothing, black nor a

female, how would you know if I am considered by some to be a freedom fighter,

you likely has never had to fight. The truth is I bring black lives matter, as well as

women against sexual abuse cases and causes to the fore front daily, and that is

usually at no cost to my clients or the person upon commencement. So for the judge

to say what I am to my people is his opinion, and I can understand it since he likely

has not had to live the life that I and others did and do. I believe and have been called

a black woman whom helps the poor and black people alike indeed since the

inception of being sworn in to practice law in Mississippi I have always strived to

make this state better than what it use to be. I further told the honorable judge

Jordan that such statement from the court could cause me to be in trouble with my

client whom could have taken that statement as an intentional statement that I should

not be their lawyer and that I did not do my job toward that client’s case. Therefore, I

did nothing wrong but to show to the court that although I am a black older woman, I

am human and attacking my education was not going to cause the writings from this

office to differ, instead, brings more questions especially since I often read the work

of other lawyers whom files with state and district courts and find several misspelled

words but I do not see where any court opinion on anything but the facts and law

before that court. Therefore, I did nothing wrong with the by filing a respectful and

13
 proper objection that saves my firm from harmful complaints because the judge is

essentially telling the client that I cannot spell or the likes, at least that was the humor

found in the footnote to some. In fact, when I went over that order with my client

she was torn because she thought that judges are to be fair and not appear biased. In

fact, I told her that I would withdraw from her case because I don't think that she

would get a fair adjudication with me involving this judge. She begged me to stay, I

did. Moreover, Clearly as powerful as the chief judge in this district court could

with the stroke of his pen, exercise his authority and power to sanction me or have

me to respond to being unprofessional to him, he did not, and the document attached

shows I was not disrespectful.

F. It followed that judge Kent McDaniel by virtue of his page [1] bar complaint against

me, is simply EXTREMELY ANGRY with me for filling the [2] judicial complaints

against him and filing with the Mississippi Supreme Court a complaint of his

breaking several Canon Rules 20-M-0995. I did not simply make conclusions of the

honorable judge Kent McDaniel’s bad behavior I support each claim with evidence.

The same is attached here below as exhibits A-T, which is filed with the Mississippi

Supreme Court under case NUBER 20-M-0995.

G. Continuing with the honorable judge Kent McDaniel’s bar complaint. The first

paragraph after he says I chastised the honorable judge Jordan, judge McDaniel’s

says: “MY FELLOW LAWYER also advised that Robinson has had confrontations

and similar disrespect problems with Linda Anderson, a black/female Magistrate.”

14
MY RESPONSE: The judicial system must be fair, WHO ARE HIS FELLOW

LAWYERS, I have a U.S. Constitutional Right to Due Process and if someone is

accusing me of violating my oath as an attorney, please tell me who are they? In fact,

pursuant to M.R.P.C., if another lawyers knows that a lawyer has violated any

M.R.C.P. they have a duty to report the violating lawyer. Does these rules only

apply to some and not all, of course not. There is no record where the honorable

judge Linda Anderson ever sanctioned me for being disrespectful to her, nor has the

same judge ever filed any bar matter that I was disrespectful to her, please check the

record, obviously someone did to make this assertion. Oh come on, that is the second

most powerful judge in this state, surely as long as she has been adjudicating she

knows how to file a complaint and/or sanction a lawyer. The truth is, as I wrote when

the honorable judge Gargiulo brought this same matter to a motion to recuse that I

filed in another case, “let me be clear, Judge Linda Anderson is an icon in the face of

this lawyer, she is a black female whom has acquired to be a magistrate judge. I like

may others in my black community honors her. So as then in that response and now,

shame on anyone that would say that I disrespected such an honorable magistrate

judge. The way I see it, the problem that voters as well as judges seeing that matter is

that why in the name of Jesus would the honorable judge Kent McDaniel make

reference to Magistrate Linda Anderson’s race. It certainly does not matter to her

authority and power over a simple lawyer as myself because when I am before her I

answer her as the Court, Judge, or Your Honor. Why does the color of her skin has to

15
be shown in judge Kent McDaniel’s argument to describe her, I mean does not the

judges in the Mississippi Supreme Court know her, again I am confused. I have

clearly not violated my oath as an attorney nor any M.R.P.C. To be clear, I know that

I am a nearly [5] year practicing attorney, and the vehement fight I try to do for those

whom typically have no voice could be seen as nervy, but that isn't that what I swore

before the Mississippi Supreme Court to do. In fact, I am required to be skillful,

competent, diligent, professional, and loyal to my clients and in bringing the court

the laws that substantiates the facts regarding the case before the court. Clearly I

must be doing that because it would seem reasonable that the honorable judge Kent

McDaniel WOULD SIMPLY ALLOW THE COURT TRANSCRIBED

RECORDS THAT HAVE BEEN DESIGNATED AND PAID FOR to be

PRESENTED TO THIS COURT in an effort to show that I am what he is claiming,

that is unprofessional, crazy, inducing a client to perjure himself. BUT HE HAS

NOT AND EVEN WITH MY REQUESTING THESE TRANSCRIBED

RECORDS THROUGH THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT, I AM TOLD

EVEN TODAY THAT JUDGE KENT MCDANIEL'S SAID THERE ARE NO

RECORDS FROM THE LOWER COURT. Please check the record in the

Mississippi Supreme Court of Appeals. Of course there is a transcribed recorded,

that’s why the clerk sent over the estimated cost, and I paid for it, and it cleared the

bank, meaning that Becky Boyd cashed the check, unless she is now saying that she

embezzled the money. Please see exhibit B and C. The Clerk’s words not mine.

16
 Please lets be fair and see this for what it truly is, the honorable judge Kent McDaniel

is continuing to slight the integrity of the judges seat in Mississippi, and the

Mississippi Bar. No longer can the Supreme Court can sit idle and allow that seat to

be violated as clearly shown in this instance.

H. Next, judge McDaniel goes on a rampage regarding the honorable judge Gargiulo as

being a conflict. MY RESPONSE: I am not sure what the honorable judge means

by a “conflict,” but the filed record shows that I filed a motion of recusal for judge

Gargiulo. First, I represent clients of whom believed that motion was in there best

interest, second, I stated the reasons why in the motion and to other investigatory

agencies. I clearly stated that I then as do know believe that judge Gargiulo is more

than capable of presiding over that case but because of some circumstances my

plaintiffs believe that the motion should be made especially since an appeal is always

an option. Now judge McDaniels wants me to be slighted for exercising plaintiffs

right to seek recusal, I am confused, do I perform the duties as required by the

Mississippi Bar and Courts, or do I pick and choose even if such picking and

choosing could harm the very plaintiffs that I was engaged to work for. Of course

not, a plaintiff has a right to seek the motion and of course the judge has the right to

deny or grant it. The honorable judge denied the motion and the case is still active

today. Now, if such statement against my character or fitness is made to harm me,

then the record shows that judge Gargiulo never and to this date has filed a bar

complaint against me nor did he sanction me for doing my job. Instead, he responded

17
 to the motion to recuse and the case proceeded as any other case, at least to my

knowledge. I did not see where the magistrate nor the District Court in that case has

in anyway retaliated against me for writing the motion to recuse, nor for the reasons

why. Therefore, the mere mentioning of this matter and that judges performance in

this dark situation is troubling. He did not deserve to be a part of this judges

retaliation work against this attorney all while refusing to present the court

transcribed records of what he is claiming.

I. The last sentence in that page 2 first paragraph is again where judge McDaniel states

that: “SHE HAS THE AUDACITY I HER FILING BEFOR JUDGE JORDAN

TO CALL HERSELF A “FREEDOM FIGHTER. comparable to Harriet Tubman.

That a woman living in a big house in fashionable Bridgwater has the nerve to

compare herself to a “REAL” FREEDOM FIGHTER AND HERO IS

DISGUSTING.” MY RESPONSE: What is disgusting is a man to assume that

because I live in a big house , which I have no ideal where he gets the knowledge that

I resides in a big house, More importantly, surely the Bar and the Supreme Court

Justices see this dark talking about a small attorney as I as shameful. What

difference and why is the subdivision “Bridgewater” being called

“FASHIONABLE” by the honorable judge Kent McDaniel is strange. For instance,

what does where I live have to do with my disrespecting the honorable judge Kent

McDaniel, and why is the subdivision being called fashionable describes me as

human being or even a lawyer matters. Furthermore, regardless of how anyone

18
 feels about me what is important is that I am following the rules and just talking

about me does not prove the honorable judge Kent McDaniel’s complaint, instead, it

shows his inner being that all should see.

J. Then comes the tragic statements from the honorable judge Kent McDaniel. Judge

Kent McDaniel has now become my doctor, he said: “I believe a result of at least

one MENTAL condition from which she SUFFERS; MALIGNANT

NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY DISORDER, perhaps coupled with untreated

BIPOLAR DISORDER.” MY RESPONSE: Shame on judge Kent McDaniel. The

judge knows, or should now that only an expert in that field can render a person’s

mental capacity, but here again, PROOF FROM JUDGE KENT MCDANIEL’S

OWN MOUTH, that he refuses to be honorable toward litigants as myself. I am a

human being and I have a family and friends whom will see this dark sided talk about

someone I have only met maybe [3]times in my life and that was during brief

motions hearings. At no time did I EVER provide judge Kent McDaniel with my

medical records. And for him to deduce that I am not a black freedom fighter, I am

mentally disturbed, and a host of the issues to follow this paragraph SHOULD BE

APPALLING TO THE MISSISSIPPI BAR and God knows the Mississippi

Supreme Court. This cannot be the normal for a judge especially THE

CHAIRMAN OF THE MISSISSIPPI JUDICIAL COMMITTEE. what does that

say for our state, for our people are we now in 2020 at a stage where the very

person’s committee’s that are inducted by the Mississippi Supreme Court to SHOW

19
 INTEGRITY OF THE COURT, now allowed to disrespect the robe. No way,

seriously no way. What judge Kent McDaniel does not know at least until now, is

that I intend to make this record open to all the public especially for those whom

believe in the judicial system success as well as citizens whom has to vote for judges

to protect them and the Mississippi Constitution as well as the lifting up of our people

not the tearing them down just because you have the power, this must stops today. I

will take what the judge says about me mentally, educatedly as well as lawyerly but I

believe the Mississippi Supreme Court WILL NOT REWARD this behavior from

their judges and certainly not from the CHAIRPERSON OF THE JUDICIAL

COMMITTEE. I am sure the honorable judge Kent McDaniel’s and person with his

thoughts are laughing about the sad statements made in this bar complaint, but for

those of us whom care about the image of the judicial system, lawyers and the

makeup of our community, will will continue the fight even if it is simply

embarrassing to be called everything but a Child of God.

K. Then after the honorable judge Kent McDaniel state: “Adam, I BEG THE BAR

COMMITTEE to take decisive action and do it quickly. MY RESPONSE: For

the honorable judge Kent McDaniel to literally put in a written bar complaint that I

am mentally ill, specific naming his diagnosis of what he thinks I am ill with, and

that I am not a freedom fighter when he has never walked in a black female shoes and

then say to this Bar Committee, “I BEG YOU, “ is troubling. Does the judge’s

begging the committee to harm a person whom has not violated any M.R.P.C. Rules

20
and has stated over and over that THERE IS AN OFFICIAL COURT

TRANSCRIPTION ON TWO DIFFERENT HEARING DATES THAT

CLEARLY SHOWS THE WORDS OF THIS ATTORNEY AS WELL AS THE

WORDS OF THE HONORABLE JUDGE MCDANIEL available, paid for by this

lawyer on behalf of the appellant, as well as properly designated through the Rankin

County Clerk’s office, but JUDGE KENT MCDANIEL’S EVEN AS OF TODAY,

THROUGH THE RANKIN COUNTY CLERK OFFICE, TOLD THE

MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT THERE IS NO RECORD FROM HIS

COURT. That is not the truth as shown above. If the Mississippi Supreme Court or

this Bar would force by order of the court, the records of those hearing to be made a

part of this record, the record will show that the honorable judge Kent McDaniel is

not telling the truth of the matter. Remember these records were order as far back as

JULY 8, 2020. Please see the attached docket sheet. They have been paid for and the

money cleared my expense account, and still judge McDaniel and Becky Boyd have

conspired to do wrong. So, Mr. Kilgore, even with a sitting judge saying he is

begging you, you have a duty of oath to seek the truth of the matter and the facts

and the facts shows that I have done no wrong and that if the judge feels he is

correct in attempting to hang my license and name out in such an ill way, then

surely this Mississippi Bar requires that infallible proof, proof beyond a reasonable

doubt, or even the preponderance of evidence is shown. Nether is there found in

this matter in favor of judge Kent McDaniel. Therefore, I should be vindicated of

21
 these awful accusation by a sitting County judge whom is simply angry that I filed

[2] different judiciary complaints against him, although he is the chairman of that

very board, which is why I filed with the Mississippi Supreme Court, the same

evidence 20-M-0995.

L. Then the honorable judge Kent McDaniel makes a profound statement that is: “I

HAVE TOLD YOU BEFORE AND TELL YOU AGAIN, and then the honorable

judge Kent McGee ATTACKS MY COMMUNICATION SKILLS, Whether I

received a law degree from an accredited law school or passed a Bar examination.

MY RESPONSE: Shame on judge Kent McDaniel. First, he is stating that Adam

Kilgore and he have spoken regarding me all while he knew I had written a complaint

against him and that the Mississippi Supreme Court is hopefully investigating his

failure to adhere to the mandatory Canon Rules. Whether he and Adam Kilgore

spoke about me or not, is a question for the Mississippi Bar Commission to consider.

I certainly am not claiming any prejudice since I am certain that I have never met nor

know Mr. Adams, only that he is general counsel for the Mississippi Bar. I am sure

that since judge Kent McDaniel is begging Mr. Adam to toss me out of practice even

though the facts and evidence does not support his allegations, judge McDaniel must

be very desperate to try to use the words “I beg you,” which to some looks like an a

request to ask Adam to create some sort of way to dispose of this attorney. So there

is no need to discuss that assertion by the judge. Additionally, talking about my

education and the blessing I posses as a barred attorney in such a ridiculed way is

22
shameful to the robe and the oath that the honorable judge Kent McDaniel’s hold. So

again out of sure respect for the judges whom are performing their oath as sworn,

there is no need for me to say anything further, the document speaks for itself.

Surely, the honorable judge Kent McDaniel’s could not be threaten by my asking the

court to please follow the law, even if you don’t like the messenger. Isn't that what

most litigation is about, the law, the facts and the appealability of a court’s ruling. Is

not that what our democracy says, isn't that what this very nation is founded upon,

does not the United States Constitution guarantee certain right, does not even the

state of Mississippi guarantee these rights, did not the Mississippi Bar itself make me

swear to litigant for my client even when someone else might not like the cases and

facts, then please tell me what do you or judge Kent McDaniel want or expect me to

do differently. I have done my job, and sought an appeal but even the APPEAL TO

THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT is being held hostage by this same judge.

Please check the current record in the Mississippi Supreme Court case NO.

2020-TS-1265 which is the case number regarding this appeal whereby Becky

Boyd, Rankin County Clerk refuses to provide the transcript and records for

appeal. So you see listener of this response, it is not me that judge Kent McDaniel is

hurting with his words and conduct, its the very ROBE that each Justice wears and

the INTEGRITY of the courts in Mississippi whom he hurts. I am use to being

treated different than others, thats what has made me as strong as I am today. The

system must work, there must be a full recognition of the U.S. CONSTITUTION

23
 INCLUDING THE 5TH, AND 14TH AMENDMENT. It cannot be compromised

for the sake of a sitting judge whom clearly is in violation of the Canon Rules, not to

mention any sworn oath.

M. Next, the honorable judge Kent McDaniel’s in his last paragraph on page two, states:

WITHOUT SUGGESTING HOW YOU AND THE COMMITTEE OUGHT TO

PROCEED WITH YOUR INVESTIGATION, should you initiate one, I URGE

YOU TO INTERVIEW HER CLIENT IN THIS CASE, DANIEL SHOPE.

CONSIDERING TAKING TESTIMONY FROM him UNDER OATH(in bold

letters) without her present. If he is truthful.” MY RESPONSE: What a shame,

here not only is the honorable judge Kent McDaniel’s asking you to violate my

client’s right to have his attorney present during any questioning, especially since the

next sentence says, “if he is truthful,” (there is no period after that statement so one

can only imagine that the judge was continuing onto the next page, but he did not”,

but judge McDaniels is providing a precursor statement that if my client does not say

what the judge wants him to say, then he is lying. Thats enough said in this

paragraph regarding what the judge is asking you to do. There is a reminder thou,

why don’t judge McDaniel’s simply release the court transcript then everyone will

have the unadulterated truth of who said what. Surely the brilliant minds of all

involved know that there must be some wrongful conduct in those transcripts for the

honorable judge to refuse to send them to the Mississippi Supreme Court, yet alone to

the Mississippi Bar.

24
N. Next, There is a footnote at the bottom of page[2] and the last three sentences judge

McDaniel’s says: “Just as I was writing this, ANOTHER JUDGE IN THIS

COUNTY SHOWED ME A MOTION SHE FILED TODAY IN A FELONY

CRIMINAL CASE WHEREIN SHE ARGUES A PREPOSTEROUS VIEW OF

THE LAW.” MY RESPONSE: First, I have only ONE CRIMINAL

CASE in Rankin County at this time, so there can be no mistaken of which case.

Now that same criminal case is a CRIMINAL DRIVE BY SHOOTING where now

it appears that my client could not get a fair hearing before the court that judge

McDaniel’s is referring to if he wanted one. There the prosecutors offered my client

30 years, which as I told the prosecutor, why would he not take his chances in court

for the same amount of years. But that is not the problem here. The problem is why

is Rankin County Circuit judge Steve Ratliff(the presiding judge in this case) talking

with judge Kent McDaniel’s whom has absolutely no involvement with this case, at

least pursuant to the court records, about motions that have not been argued and are

expected to be argued November 23, 2020 before the honorable Steve Ratliff.

WHERE IS THE HONESTY AND INTEGRITY OF THE ROBE WITH

JUDGES, isn't there some rule that a judge must not preside over a matter of which

he cannot be impartial? Doesn't this sound like the honorable judge Steve Ratliff has

already made his mind up to deny this innocent person, whom has not been found

guilty, guilty. Doesn't it sound like judge Kent McDaniel is attempting to persuade

judge Steve Ratliff to harm my client because judge Kent McDaniel feels as he as

25
vividly stated concerning me in this bar complaint. SHOULD A JUDGE DISCUSS

THE MOTIONS FILED IN A CRIMINAL CASE WITH ANOTHER JUDGE

WHOM HAS ABSOLUTELY NO BEING IN THAT CASE. IS IT NOT

WRITTEN IN THE CANON RULES THAT A JUDGE IS TO make HIS ruling

without partiality. Mississippi Supreme Court, you must enter in and stop this

atrocity by the honorable judge Kent McDaniel’s. Mississippi Bar Committee, you

are better than to be influenced by a dark shadow that is trying to harm the very

integrity of oath that each you have taken to uphold in your respective positions.

NOW WHAT IS TO BECOME OF MY CLIENT MONDAY, clearly the

honorable Judge Steve Ratliff is already armed to call Defendant’s motion

“PREPOSTEROUS VIEW OF THE LAW.” Judge McDaniels words. As the

committee and the Mississippi Supreme Court can see, my involving the FBI as well

as media into the illegal conduct of some of the courts in Mississippi is necessary in

the interest of justice and fair play for all especially when the lawyer is dis-liked by a

sitting judge it appears the judge’s feelings for the attorney will even spew into the

legal proceeding of another court. Remember the footnote says “another judge

showed him.” Why would I be that important that men of great power would sit and

hold conversation about me. Could it clearly be because the truth in the name of

Jesus Christ frightens that spell of illegal and wrongful conduct. I swear I was only

practicing the law as provided in the rules and case law, and I had no ideal that

because I sought an appeal after a judge’s final decision that I would have to fight

26
 such corruption just to protect the integrity of honesty in statements. Last, judges

should not be talking in any ill manner about lawyers just because one doesn't like

the lawyer. Surely Canon rules suggest different, otherwise how can a person have a

fair non prejudicial trial if the judges are crucifying the clients of a lawyer for

absolutely no reason. There is no reason for judge Ratliff to be talking about a

criminal matter before him with another angry judge, he should have recused himself

from the impression of choosing to follow the law and not the co-worker/friend. But

all I can do is tell my client of this matter and hope that there exist someone on the

Mississippi Supreme Court whom has great issues with this judge’s statements.

O. Judge Kent McDaniels states on page [3] first paragraph: I BELIEVE HE (MY

CLIENT) IS THE KEY TO CONFIRMING MY FINDINGS ABOUT HER ROLE

IN THE PERJURED TESTIMONY WHICH I BELIEVE HAS BEEN

PRESENTED TO MY COURT IN THIS CASE.” MY RESPONSE: For nearly [3]

years I have fought for this client agasint what he has sworn under deposition,

affidavits and of course other pleadings that Dr. Michael Winkelman did to him. It

WAS NOT UNTIL I FILED [2] JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS, that judge Kent

McDaniel’s decided to file a bar complaint against me and the two judicial

complaints I filed against him that he started saying I was this mentally ill

uneducated and the rest found in his complaint. Although I understand that he

had to say something in his own defense, but to call me crazy, uneducated, inter alia,

is more than a stretch it’s wrong and untruthful, and unbecoming of a sitting judge in

27
 Mississippi. Again, the official court records from the [2] days of hearing is what

tells who said what, but JUDGE KENT MCDANIEL REFUSES TO RELEASE

THESE TRANSCRIPT EVEN TO THE SUPREME COURT, and it appears that

the MS Supreme Court does not desire to seek these transcript even in the name of

judicial efficacy of the courts.

P. I ask the question, has anyone with the Mississippi Bar or the Mississippi Supreme

Court willing to do the work that they swore to and cause this matter to be fairly

resolved in the interest of justice? Then the transcript has every word I said as well

as the other parties but at this time the Mississippi Supreme Court nor the Mississippi

Bar has ordered the honorable judge Kent McDaniel to provide the same.

Q. Only Jesus knows why the honorable judge Kent McDaniels would even suggest, “ if

the BAR DOES NOT CARE TO INTERVIEW SHOPE, I EXPECT LAW

ENFORCEMENT WILL DO THAT AT SOME POINT SINCE

SUBORNATION OF PERJURY IS A FELONY.” MY RESPONSE: What a

shame that this judge would even suggest my representing my client for nearly[3]

years in front of him, that somehow because my client filed an appeal of his final

order and conduct, that all of a sudden now I, the lawyer has committed subornation

of perjury. Strange, AT THE END OF THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HEARING, JUDGE KENT MCDANIEL SAID THAT I’AM A GOOD

LAWYER BUT LOST IN THIS CASE, I THANKED HIM AND FILED THE

APPEAL. Get the transcript, its there unless someone erased it, which is why he

28
 refuse to turn over the transcripts. Additionally, I say again, that I was what I called

educated lynched on September 1, 2020 during what was called a damages hearing,

although I vehemently said on record, that there has not been an order stating that

there was a granting of damages, by the two opposing attorneys who went so far as to

make the records that I was commenting extortion from their client before the lawsuit

was even commenced because I attempted to resolve the matter without

litigation(that is what I am suppose to do). But even more egregious was the fact that

judge Kent McDaniel ratified such wrongful litigation and made me sit through at

least an hour of this hanging, even when I time and again said judge please stop

taking to me in such a disrespectful way just because I am objecting on the record.

(Again get the transcript there you will see me saying “your honor, may I please

object”) over and over again to no end. So for judge McDaniel to stop these

transcripts from the hearing of the Mississippi Supreme Court must be illegal and

obstruction of justice.

R. Last, Judge McDaniels last paragraph shows his desperation to intentionally continue

to harm me and my plaintiff when he clearly says: “By the time this was presented to

me I no longer believed much of anything she said or presented in affidavits.” THE

JUDGE HIMSELF SAID HE BELIEVED WHAT I PRESENTED TO THE COURT,

and he apparently stopped believing when I filed the judicial complaints against him

and the Mississippi Supreme Case No. 20-M-0995. The affidavits presented to the

court through out this matter over nearly [3] years are not signed by me, the case is or

29
 wasn't at anytime my personal case, instead my client of whom I believe and showed

records of his claims. Therefore, judge McDaniels had not even one problem with

me prior to my filing the judicial complaints and certainly not prior to my filing with

the Mississippi Supreme Court about his violation of the Canon Rules.

S. Finally, judge Kent McDaniel’s last paragraph as found on page [3] clearly shows

that the honorable judge Kent McDaniel’s is flat out angry with me for filing the

appeal for summary judgement and he even implies that he knows that plaintiff

would pursue the appeal to the Circuit and higher COURT[S], he even said he knows

his damages award will be appealed. Then the question is WHY DOESN’T HE

STOP INTERFERING WITH JUSTICE AND ALLOW THE COURT

TRANSCRIPTS BE PROVIDED TO THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT?

it makes no logical sense.

T. Instead, the honorable judge Kent McDaniel states as a last hope of desperation, “ On

the other hand, I believe the Opinion contains conclusions on ALL the information I

had at the time I signed it, and the Exhibits speak for themselves.

U. The question to any reasonable mind is why would the sitting judge in that matter

feel need to tell the Bar Committee that his written final opinion were concluded

based on all the information he had at the time of his signing it. Would not one

especially a lawyer of the case believe that the court is making his decision based on

what was before the court? So why would an explanation be made of the contrary

unless their can be proven otherwise, like the exhibits I submitted to the Mississippi

30
 Supreme Court and the as of this day continuing to ask for the OFFICIAL

TRANSCRIPTS OF THE HEARING.

V. Now, Found below is the pleading filed with the Mississippi Supreme Court

September 8, 2020. The language is clear, that the honorable judge Kent McDaniel

violated the oath of the judiciary system as well as Canon Rules. The exhibits speaks

to that truth and more importantly I should be shown the benefit that the sworn court

transcripts are available but being deposed of by judge Kent McDaniel and that is a

crime of interfering with an investigation. So it appears that the honorable judge

Kent McDaniel is whom appear to be committing a crime. He has asked for an

investigation of which he is withholding relevant official court records that does not

belong to him personally.

W. Moreover, Judge Kent McDaniel’s is out of the scope of his judicial capacity with

calling me crazy, and have no medical records to support the same, scandalizing my

name that I am not a freedom fighter for black people, the poor, women and children

without disproving the same, and flat out mocking my education and

accomplishments as a lawyer. Pursuant to the oath I read that he took, he not to do

any of these things pursuantly under the robe, yet he is not just doing them, he is not

being stopped from the harm that he continues to inflict to me.

X. I am a human being, I have children and a spouse, all I want to do is practice the law

according to the law that I find that supports my clients claims. I am not trying to be

favored by any judge, so where I offend because of my grammar or the case law that

31
 I sight, I will not apologize for it, you as the Mississippi Bar has caused me to swear

to follow the M.R.P.C. I have done that. I have not been rude to any judge, but I must

question in writing with motions or other pleadings if the judge’s opinion does not

seem to follow the law. If you do not want me to do that then tell me so that I can

stop telling clients what the Mississippi Court of Appeals and the Mississippi

Supreme Court is for as it relates to the appealability of their cases.

Y. The only thing I got from this bar complaint is that a sitting judge can file a bar

complaint and beg the general for the bar to inflict harm to an innocent attorney just

to save that judge from the consequences with the I hope Mississippi Supreme Court.

As such, I am sending a copy of this response along with other supporting

information to the FBI, THE U.S. ATTORNEY MIKE HURST

OFFICE(especially since judge Kent McDaniel copied the U.S. Attorney),

MADISON COUNTY D.A. MR. BRAMLETT( here again judge McDaniel

copied this office with this illegal bar complaint) as well as filing the same with

the Mississippi Supreme Court in hopes that the Supreme Court will cause the truth

of these matter to be asserted through the refused court transcripts that will tell who

said what and when, and last it is my hope that I can help justice ring in Mississippi

through the national news media so to be in compliance with the Bar, I am revealing

that I have a duty to citizens and my clients to take any INJUSTICE against a

woman and woman of color to the world for open discussion about the courts in

Mississippi as well as the lawyers as I.

32
Z. Now to each charge as found in the Mississippi Bar’s exhibit one PART THREE:

M.R.P.C. 3.1, 3.2, 3.4(a), 3.4(d), 4.4(a), 8.4(a), 8.4(d). the evidence shown in this

response clearly shows that I have not violated NOT EVEN ONE OF THESE

RULES, as such, the proof as attached hereto shows that the honorable judge Kent

McDaniel’s is extremely angry with me for filing [2] judiciary complaints agasint

him and filing with the Mississippi Supreme Court showing that his conduct as a

siting judge and especially the chair of the watchdog that the Mississippi Supreme

Court enacted to prevent or stop bad conduct by judges. Judge McDaniel’s made up

allegations about and against me are troubling to any reasonable person and he

should be stopped immediately and not allowed to use this made up statements so

that the Mississippi Supreme Court will somehow blame me for judge McDaniels

bad behavior.

CONCLUSION
In the interest of justice and for the integrity of this Mississippi Judicial Court system,

Plaintiff and his attorney prays that this court will immediately cause this matter to be

ended, resolved reversed and rendered to another judge and jury that will be fair to the

holdings of the Mississippi Supreme Court Rules as amplified in writing in the Canon

Code of Judicial Conduct as adopted in 2002 by the Mississippi Supreme Court.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED :/s/Abby Robinson(MBN105157)

ABBY ROBINSON & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM PLLC.

227 E. PEARL STREET

33
 JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
phone: 601-321-9343
Fax: 601-487-6326
Email: arobinsonlawfirm@yahoo.com
Email: abby@askabbylaw.org

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Abby Robinson, the undersigned attorney, hereby certify that I have this day 18th day

of November, 2020 electronically filed a true and correct copy of the above and

foregoing Notice of Appeal to the follow:

Honorable Kent McDaniel

215 East Government Street
Brandon, Mississippi 39042

Honorable Wesley Williams, III

Markow Walker, PA
Post Office Box 13669
Jackson, MS 39236-3669
wwilliams@markowwalker.com
Attorney for Defendant

Honorable Chris J. Walker

Markow Walker, PA

34
Post Office Box 13669
Jackson, MS 39236-3669
cwalker@markowwalker.com
Attorney for Defendant

Honorable Roy Smith

Daniel Coker Daniel Coker
4400 Old Canton Road, Suite 400
Jackson, MS 39211
601-969-7607
rsmith@danielcoker.com

/s/Abby Robinson (MSB 105157)

227 E. PEARL STREET
JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
TELEPHONE: (601) 321-9343
FACSIMILE: (601) 487-6326
Email: arobinsonlawfirm@yahoo.com
Email: abby@askabbylaw.com

35
E-Filed Document Nov 19 2020 14:05:34 2020-M-00995 Pages: 16

C.LJ)SE D, Peudn1g_Fee

!VI i.ssissipp i J(I ecJ n,i n ic Courts

1w rinti~Lb Circuit Court District (Ranki n Cp.unly Court)
CTVlL DOCKET EOR CASE If: 61CQl:,.18-tv·Q232?

,SIIC>pe \'. Wi11kelniann ot al Dme J"i led: I Jl20i1Q 18

/\S.'iigned tu; K~nf MeQ,mle]
o·are Te rmi 11litcd: U7/0<ii202LI
To1a l Cn~e Age: 594
[ lpcomin.g Setting;;: Ju1:y Dcrrrnrrd: :Pl3intiff
[2 161 Melil,11 llr.arl11g; 0'//0 112020 02:()(Jf:'~·1 - Rankin Counn Natui~ <;ifSull: 175 Oih·e r Tcuts.
C:owthou:,,e

Plaintiff
naate1 S hope re.presented by Abbs Gi1lt: l{obln.sv.n
Al:lhy Rob1nsoJr & A-,;srn., i,.tles La\v Firm
rt,,LC
227 E. t'eiirl Stre-e1
JACK$DN, MS 3'92()1
(iQ t..::,11 9343
Fax: 60 1--4S7-6:i26
!:mail; nrotiiJ IB<mlawfirm1t!7vatioo.cu11i
ATI'OUNE>' 'l'() RF N(JT!CE!) .

\I
Defe:ruhmt
D1·. Mkli:ael Winkclmam1 rc.pta~eme.d by HuJ,~rt·W~!ilcJ WilliM\SJ TH
hi /ii;I' professwm,i and his p,wsona./ captwifJ · 5'99 H1gh!.and Colurry P~rk way
Sullc 100
RJDGF.LA N.O, MS l9 L57
00 l -S53.- 19 ll
Emai I: .w(vi Jlliu:us@ rnark:owwalk:er.com
LEA IJ AlTORNEY
,1r1pRN.E1 TO n r. NO'J'J<:Ev
u~.t'e11tlau1
Nl'w South Neunrspinv Clinic rev.rescrn~d lJ,y ~o.v A, Smith, .fr.
44()0 () Id Canton Road, Saile 4()0
JACKSON, MS 392 l I
60 1-9.~9-7607
:fiix: 60 1-959- 11 J6
Email. rs111itl1@<lunielcoke,·.com
LF.AFJ .~'/TOl?/'IF:r'
A-ITONNEl; TQ BE N(JT!Ch'IJ
k !C't1di111l
N~w South Neur'osµi1w Clink EXFIIBIT
,111dlr,r rhe )1t·fi1101~r nam<' of Ab,•South
Ne.wvspim Clir1ic oJ Adl'Um ...rl N.1 ~, 8~"
l -~
I lo
 Y 1·20~0

l'li<1,111a,y iJJ1dlor Flt•111i0t,s 11C1111e '<'IV

Sou1/t Nr111i'ti.1pi/w Dii•isi(,11/ 1~/"Sp//uil
It I(L'l'Vrf llitiri

- - -- - - -
II- r »<>~llct 'Jex
_,_ _ - - --- -- - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- ,
11/10/2018 l I CONIPI..AlNT agai nst , New "South Neumxpinc Clinlc. Michael Wirr.l-,e:tma1111, fil ed by
OHniel Sl1op-~ .(Atraehmems: # J. Exhibi t A,# 1 ~xhihlr 8 , # l Exliihir C, H:! Ex,hibltJ): H-
,~ Ex.bib ii E. # l;l Civi l Cuv~r Shet!L,) (Mtf1 ( ~nttre~I~ 1112()/20181 _ _ _ _
I Il20i2(,) 18 1
J S·UMMONS ls~l·as to Mkl111d WiJJkl'[afam1. (M K) (Bnter'~d! l l/2012(_1l_::i_
) _ _
lli:i0/20 I R ~ MC1NS !$~lied ii,, lo New -So11t lLNeLil'o_spine. QI Hk, I JVfH) (E111J:J>ed: IJ 12011018)

I 1,20120 IR
I,SUIVIMONS l~s:itt!tl as. Jo New Sout~ Neurc.ispine: CJlnic :tndlot I he fictitious name oT
Ntw \)QlJlh ·Ncun~!)!IIJ! ,Clinie of Ad vun_Ged Rx Pharmacy a11J/vr Ficiilfous n;rme Ne w
I 6(.)0lll. Neurosplne Dl vi~io11uf Spinal hi1erven ti,~i1 (MU) (En rered: 11/20/201 SJ
11/2.7/20 18 ;--isuMM()NS 'f{elltrned :Exec.med by Dnnie( 'Slillp.e, 8urm111J11.1 Remnu!d <l!IN
--
i:,1-,,-S('-,1-, l-11_H_X
. __-!
J' J S~rvice type : Perso1rnl (Rob1n~o11. Abhyl t&,1el'ed: I ll2'7l20 18)

SllMMGNS R.etumcd Executed by [)uni el ~Jwpe , N~w Si)urh NetLi'b$/)ine r::'lh1ic se.rved
J !11.}120 1S .u. 011 J It:?. Ii2018. answer dui; 1212 !/.201'8. Service ty11c; Personal (Robinson, A buy)
(D,11Lered: r 1127/20 11>'1

f I 11~7/201~ f1
SUMMONS Remmed l::"ec:11ted b~· l)11uicl Shoµt . Sen~ l)'JJeo: P.ei:sonuf (Rouln:,,OJJ,
Abl:iv1 <E nteied; 11121,20 r R, · ...
r-- -- . - - -- --- - - - - - -- - - - -j

12! 17t20 IS '2. A,\ /SWER co l Co111plui n1 by i\•licl1~i:'l Wi11kl'lmarrn. (\\/jfiiam;:, 1fo:beTt) (G11ercd:
l ::!!!7/2[/ lf:i'I
- -- -- - - ---- ----
I I ;2/ !(J/ 211 I $ ~ ANS\VI:R to l C0111plulri1 fly N e"i,· S-tJuth J\'eLrroSJ)ine dwl.c. /,Smitfr, Ruy) ( En)cre.i±
I 2120120 I ~ l
--- --
02/0i 1.?i'.ll9 lll N()TrC'.1:-0F ~l!RVJCE ,1[ lnrcrri>ga!oritls Pro~uun(f.,d to nll thfcndunts by D,mi.el
Slropc. ( Re~I rr,,,u. A h b)) ( t:.nt~retf• 02/01/201.9)

Q2 '0 Ii2Cl! 9 ll
- - - - - -------
NOTICE Or S ERVI CE of Requ~,l fo1· Ad1i1i~~iom;S'ropouutled co all ·Dofe11d~1lL" hy
/ Dm1tel ShtlpC. f Ro~ln~cu,. A liby) (Emcred; ll2/0 1/20 ~9)
01/0lt2Uf 9 NGT!CITOF SERVJC'!c or Req11eSl fur Pmch.1cllrn1 of-l)o,;tune.nt.s Propoun_ded to ull
Dtfenu(Ults by r~rut(el Shop;;, (Robrn_$0A,Abb)d ( Eme1:ed: 02/() 11201 9) ·

()J{()l f2019
NOTI C£
- - - -- - --
bJ. SERVJCE nt' Response~ lti R:cquest !'ii i' Admis$io.m;.by 1'\l! idmeJ --
ll Wlnkelm:11111, Ret111ed do~u1ne1i-t. lJ. Noli,;: of'Service of Rcq116ttor 1\ ('lmis~ion~ ffled
j Li) Dnnlel Shope. ( \\11fl l;11rs'i. I luht•n1 fi3JJtereisl: OYO 1/20 P))
'-- - - - - t - - - i -- - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - -
1 NOTICE OF S8RVl1E 01 Re~ponses IP Request for Ad1ui ~ ions Liy Ne-w S\1ut11
IO.li0f l2.0JSJ le! Neµri;)spl11e Clinic. f~,el:11ed dot;ume~t: LLN0tfae of Service o f' R'eqllt!Sf for Admis~1uns
filed by °i)a111<li :Shope, {Smirh, Roy) Mn(lified 0113/ l /28 19 r KJ \.''DOCirEflNG ERROR
SEE ANNo·c~TfON flELOW" (Eniered: (tl/01/2019-J .
-- -- --
1;5 '" I I ., I <IS l!' Jd' 11, I , , ,I ,,~ "' re ii,: 111~ le• ul I. ,
1 11111,., 1i • 1. \K.l 11Entei·eJ· u3101 12tJl.!l1

- INO'l'ICEOr SF:1-(VlCL: or lnterrng1,1od~ Pi·ap~n.lep

Pl-ailitiff. NOT ICc o r, - .
I
031(1 lI:!(I L!J lfl
[(I
Sb'RVLCJ-: or Ri;_qui;~t for :Prorlt1r.ll1m of D<;1c,1unems ProRO.Untled to Plai nti ff hy 1yti.cl1ael
\VinkdmliUJL rWillia1i1~. I lubm) ( 1!,mered: 03/() l/20 I 0) ·
·- --+-- -+--- -
03/0112019 l1 I
NO'!'ICE or ~F.RV ICE CJf Respo11Se!> to Request for Aclmisslons·by New'S1111th
 •lit ~ /) Tv, c:nm'lll i "m .1111 ( rurt f)i1tr!t.1-1J.J.ckct ~(Pflfl
NQun1~pill~ C'J h1k . R~lmcd clodinie11t:._u No.dG-1 of Servlc.e of'Reques.\ for Adrni.s~l{1ns
I fi led by Dunid Sh11pe , 1Srni I h. Roy1 (Emerc<l: (}:l/0 I /2() I<J)
NOTIC~ OF SEBVlCE nf R~~OJl~-es 1,, Jiiterrogmories by Michnel 'Ni nl{elm,rn_n_. -
_ Flel~ted i..lOq11l:i.,r1t· W Notte~ of Scrvke of lntertoga_rorJcs fiJ cd hy I)~nld SJ1ofic.
( Willlru:m, I Jubem f E1 11ered: o.vos.120 191

I 1
NQTJ'CP. OF SF.l{_\. 1€'~o{ Re.,;11;es 1,i l<equest for Prciductivn by Mi,;Ji~el
Q3/0:f/20 19 IJ..'l. Wii1kdmru111, Related J ocumenr: J2 N11tfce ,,rS-e1'vic.e of Req,,~st For l'roducliu11 of
f) ocumems Mt.!<I tiy D,~Hiel Shnpe.. ( Wil liams. Hubert) (Entered: Q3/U.5/2019)
- -- - --l
I0;;1.2n,2019 NOTICE OF S-ERV ICE oJ' Re,'1Pl)nse$ to !nterrOl1llWrie,, NOTICE ()F SERVK'E·or
Re-s_ponses to Req.ucsl fur Pr()tfoction by Nt'\v Souih Ne11rosp111e .Clinic:. rSmill1, l{oy )
/ F.nlered: OJl2t)l'20J91

MOTION for Su1nmnry J11dgmen1 6y PlllimiffD:iniel Sho~c (Atmchine:nr,;; 1t L f.xhibit

-- --
1009 prescri ptlo11s, 11.1, E,'hl!Jlt RX rec.ords, # J .Ex(lil~it R-ele-~_!¢e r~tt1"-r, # :4£xhib1t mnncy
·Q5i06/20J 9 mo6yarfon le Her.#. ,i Ex hihit O.pioi1l lene,r:B ;1pH.st, # !:i"-Exh,bir Jttn!! July'RX , # 2. Exlriblt
Nn Ji"am lett,~r~. if] Exhll\il"T~~iresult,# ~ Exhibit workman :cnmp let_ter;# 10 E.xJ:libit
f oJi_c~·, # 11 E~ hitiit Opiol chymptom;.) I R0bi nson. Ahby) (Ente1 ed: 05! 0(it2C) !':))
- - - - + - - - .,-'--- - -
'05t06l20 I ') IJl. MJ:/\ JORAl"DUM i11 SupJlort t·e ll.M01 fON for S.ummn ry li!dj!nle~tl'artiri/ Sw11111m~·
I
. JuligJll<"III l>) l)aui,d Sliupi:1. 1 Rooinson ..•\hhy) ( Entered, 05(()/J/25)J9)
- F. to M111icm ~ , l MOTION ror S.uH1mary Judgment b_y_Mic
--+---,.1-R_Fl_S_P_O_N_'S- ___ h_l-1el
I 0.5, l6!21)J '.I ll Wi11kdmRn1L (A;tnd1rnents: #-1 Exhlhit 1 ~ Wi nkru 1m111a ",.\ffkl~vi, ,·) (Wi1il.am~. Hubert)
(Em~red; 05/J 6/20 I IJ1

1i-,5/J ()i20l<J l:l I

fVU;MfJ'RA/1.,PUM in SuppN1 ,:e. :U Response 1<1 MQti1Jn by Mj_cJutcl Whikelu l;J1il1. - -
_,__ _~l(_Willi:ttns. 1111':_er.1) (1:n.ereil: 051I<i/2019)
M(>TJON trl Hold Phlmiff, 1'•1otton fm f'art_iul Suu1ninry Ju.i..lgmell! 1_ln Li~brl!Ly _.\ga.insl
t)j/ l 612() I '1 Z5 D r. Mlc!1ael \\Trnkelrnan11 und N~w~o11L11 Ne'urosppln.e fskJ in A!.x:yancc r,· ll MOTION
ior °SlJTinnary ,Judgment L-,;- DeffndAul Mich:~d Wink.,lmann (Willlr.ims, l-lt1he1'1J
(Ei1tered; O;'i/ I 612019J

j0 116!2019 ;!<:, Rl-'.SPONS!: to Mori e111 r~ll tvlQTIONi:or Suin1111.,.ry Jud11-me,,t by Ne.w South
Ncur9spl nit Clinic, (Smith, Roy) (Entered: 05/161201.\1)

~ ; 16/201!) -:::I. 11\.l~~QRl\~DUM in S11p1mrr fr ~ R_<':qwnse to Meti.on b)' New South Ne1rro~pim,
c;l 111 i c:-, ( S1111 llt. R,1y ) {F.ntcre.d.: 05/1 6120 I <)\
I MOTION Hnld .Pl.u-inriffs \fotlo11 rut P:tr11nl Summary Jud.gmem 011 Liabi lity /\gui 11q
!)511612019 lli I D1•. JVlil~hi!el Wi11~d111nnn:.::i.nd New, c>urh Ne.urosµrne i111\ l?~Y"<U1C<' re 21 MOTTPNYr,r
I S111nrnnry J~m,.rnr by br.fend.,un .ew StH>lh Neurb,pint! Clmic.tSmifh, R<:}yJ (Entered:
05/ 16/20]') )
-- -- - - -
R.ESl!ONSb 111 Oppo:slt1u11 re Ii MOTION f0rS11mm11ry Jw4,rmenl. ~ MOTiON I lol<l
Jllai ntlffs Motlnnfor P~rtin l Sumn1ary J1tt!gthcnt on Ltahility Agamst Dr. Midmef
Wf11kelmlinn :rnd Ne1Yst1111 h ;'\Jt~-ir<>>'pint' in Al·>?ym1ce 1·e:21 MOTIQN for Swnmnf)'.
0;\!.2 I i2Q l >;I .2\! JutJgn1~1ll,~ MOTION m Hold Pl:li.rrt iff• M1ition (<:if P:11tisil Swnma.ry Jupgment rn1
.Liabil I iy Agnill~l Dr. t\ tlr huel Wi nkelriillfln \Ind Nv. I\· W}Jtl1 Neumspp1ne.. Isk I in

t
Ahey1111ce 1e 2.! MOTK) N ti;)r Summ3ry Judgment by Daniel Shope. tAttl!chmei1tM it 1
l;.~)11bl I docket ~11ea,./1 ' l:::tlli.bit e.ln0 iIs:) ( Robt nson, Abliy ) (Enterc~, 0.$/,! )12.019)

Q.:i/~()/2(j 19· J(l

1- -- - --,e-----'-- - -- -
,1,.-~,;•tW1!1JU4:thri1,;aiilme.:.1m
-/\FFfDA\/rT 111 Suppon re ~I vl<JTI(')\ r11r Su111111,a_r_ u1!gmcn1!}) l.)a11.iel Sho~1-£ ,
y _J_
\A1tat:l 11 rrcnG :../l 1 c..\ hHm pharn1t1.;.) r-ccurcfa, # .;ExhilJit New Siuu!h_letter, it) Exhibit
:1
\Vu1k:el mnnn r~cords, /F :1: 8. l11tJit policy.-#~ ExbJhit Nt.w Soutli ~ee0rds. # OExhJ bit
New
- SoLJth r~cords, . . 1I Robii1so11. A!Jbv)
- ., i Emered: 0.5730/2019J
- -- - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - - ,
c 11\ ''-¥i-Nn'0~1k.pt 111.., 1~~71< I'n3.~,,~ LJJ.~ t>, I
 ~·1-1m.n
t\, ,.,utJ.:th c m:tiil <..-Ou,1n,~,11 l·l?J!-Ld ~r,,i;itt
05/3 lf20J? ii. MOTION-Entry oiSche.rlu l111g brderby Defendam M-\lih1rel \\rmkd1i1,11111 (t\l l;l<.:hmtnts,
.if l ExhibirA_pmptiSNI ~clietlulJng 11rde1'. If l Exli·i bri
!3 1emoil from A ,R.o bmson.}
_ __;;_(Wllli,Lms, Hubert) (Eirter~d, 05).i li2019)
- - - - - -- - -
Reque,,'t to lssue SlJFlPO.E.l\'A for Pr\lth.;efi6JJ/lr1sp~ctlun oy !v1foha~I Wh1kelmann.
06/03/20!9 (Attocl1rne11t~; # .l ExhJ~i t S"Ill • Ml~~iss'im:ii Bt11:em1 oJ' 1'foroode.~·.1 (\Vlllmm~·. !Jubert)
IEntere.d: 0.6103120 l 9.)

l..,,..20 19 IW[ukdm~uu.
NOTICE OF 'S ER\' fCE 01 Re~pons.e~ l(•
RelmcJ Jncume11t; ~
Reque$1 for f>rmluctinn by Mlchuel
.~01ice. of Service of R~pon.ses t(·> ltcq tt~~t for
~ 1 - -- 1 Prodm;tlon filed J1y Michu~I Winkelman 11. rWllli:uri s, 11trber!) ( l::i1t('.J:'.ed: Oh/04! .W IV)
Q6:Q4/ 2JlJ 9 .Ji+ SUTfPQENA IJueet1 re.cum fSSl.lED,as 10 Missl~sipp1 B'u re,m ofNu rco:lcs for
1'toi1ui:tionll11spee1inn. IKJ ) (J:.ntered: 06/0412019) · ·
---- - -- --- -- __ _
0()'0•li'20 J9 R-ESPONSE: In Oj1p0sitivn re .U. MOTION Entry of S<;hedu llng 0.rdci by D.a'a,cl Shopti.
(Attachmuns: ti l F..xhibit e.m;ill,) fRuhi11s611 , Abby) (Entc'tctl· 06/04/2019)
- -- - - - -- - -- -1
N0TICEO F 5 ERV I("Eur Re.spouse, to Lmerrogntories IJy Qani:C.I 'S!lope-, ( R6lii11.scin'.
06/0.'i/20 I '! Abby) Modl.iied ,111 £if(,!?{) 19 1Henderson, Kirby j, ll~(jCK_Ef1NG ERROR SE!:'. O

I-~ ANNOTATION 13EL()W I I Et1tered: !J6/05/2(1L9)

\/t>TtC°E bi, S~V!CE of T<cque~t ror Produ<:liun nfl)octlh1ents. -Propo111tJed to ALL
()6/0512019 o·e/'e.rufo.nts b; .D»11i·e1:Shnpr, (Robi11wi1,Abby) Modified 0116/(i/20!9 (llender~on,
L..
-- Kirby), f ~OCKETING£RROR • SEE ANNOTAT!ON B ELC>W] (Enti!r~!I: 05/05q<H.!;))

06i05t20!9 38 DO<:t.J;I .\ ·, '.U I \J • 1 :.,qo .[:'. , l!i , 1w 11Tc.:c LJ,Ju,.-111,_, . , 111 ,~kll · ,I \ii ,11,.1
o111\.lk,J
1., r,· l1k . ( 1:Icnderso;t. Kirbyr (Entet·e'd~0610(1/2019) ·

/)()/(.)612019 J\) NOTICE Of S'r.RVJCL:. 111 lnrerrngi,wric~ l?ropouuded to.ALL 01:.J=.ENDAJ\.T S l,y
D;miel Sll{ipc. (R<>binson, Abbyl <Enrered: 06/06/1019)
_J
MOTl ON ln Ct:m1prl /'lamfff'1 Dc./!(Hitio,1!Jy D~fend!lfl! i'YliehaeJ Winkelmmm
- - - -- -- --
0GI07l2fl L9 40
(Alt.»dunru1b' -# J.Exlril>it A.l ( Willi ams, 1lubcn) t'Emerctl: 0(,J(l7i2019)
- - -- --!
NO.T l!;.:!', OJ· SE.RV ICk ,:if Rc,;ponses ra l.t1tcm:>irntories by Michael Wiukelmllrin,
O<i1(l7t20 J9 41 R~larcd doc.ume11t: 31/ No1ice of Serv1c~ of lmefrtlgUJ;pries tile.cl Li· Dmik1 SJ1ofic.
(Willhims, Hubett! (tnte r:c~· Ot:i/07/2()19)
- - ----
NOT'lCb of.Hearing re.:ll ,\-IOT!ON m Compel P/t111tl(J'l D~p1i,<irim1. Q Mi3TION !11
U()ld"F'lo111Ll11\ Mriric,11 n,r P'dliinl Sua ur,ltry Judgment on Liahility Agal,1M Dr. Mfohttlll
0(,/tl 7/10 1IJ Wi 11ke lm:mn ru1d ~i:wsouth Neufosppine lsk I i11 Abeyan.c.e re ! I MOTION forS umm ary
jmJgi,1cn1, JlMOT ION Entry of !:,"Chcduling Orde t by Mid1ael Win~IUlaun (\\lilfiams,
IJuber[J Modified w161JOJ2019 !lli1tJe.r~vn, Klrhy). (DQCKETlNG 5RrfOf{ . $ER
1\ NNOTATlON 13,EI.O\\.' I \En,lt,,r.;d f)i,//)712fJ 19)
j 06:0712019 REBU'n 'A L In re ~ Resµom,.., h1 Qppo.s,itkm ttr Mo.ti!;ln by tvlfcha~I Winkd ma1u1.
/ Willi:~ms. Hubt:rt i (Ei1trred: CJ(i/ 0'7120 19)

t ,:07 2019
1
4-!
- - - -- - -- - -- - -- -- - -- - -1
io1 NDER l<11..LMOTION E1my t1f ~chetILl1lug Order l;iy New S1.1111 h J\!curo~piu~. C'Hnic.
i ~roith, Roy) 18me1·ed: tJo/071 20 IIJ)
---
Uli!07; 1J) 19 45 .l{)I N DER Lo ill J\lOTICJN tr> CompC-1 l'/lltrlif!'S D 1,1posi1Fr11i b'y N~I-I S.ourlr Neurospl n~
r Cli111L , CSmi tlt. R,iy I fEil tr1~d: U61t\7i:'W t9)
-
NOT.ICE oF Uearillj r<' :!.K MOTION Hnld f'laintif !\ M oti.on f(lr Po rtii1 i Sunun :rry
- -----
1~
I06:01120 Vi' ,ludgii ll:Jll 1111 I h1·l;>llll)' AgRin~1 Dr Mfth.ad 'Ni nkel t11f11Hu 111tl_Newsouth ~i:;u rosl.!111e in
j .-\J1toyiltice rn :!_I MOTION for Suinmnry Judgmem hy New South Neu rff~pi11e.Clinlp
tiJ
1Su1iih. Roy ) rEmercd: 06/07/20J9l
 01 !J'2.02tl I ',h'.1Hkth n .n:mJ t ·011rt Oi~!Ht.t•h(ft:J,:"er R?JIUrt.
47 lJ.l lll(r 1 ,, ,\1)T\I IIJ'·i a~ H1 ~ : IM111,c~1,fa1~ Ii tc\l 1111\1,1111:e 01 ifem111!! \ 111,rn,;\
~Ob'l&~I, ,1J1 l•..•il 1 -ltlr .. 11:lt il<lGr~~·n. Kirby) (Eritcrnd; 06/J 0/2(1 I') 1
;...__...;

NOT ICE of-H<!aring l'e dO M(rl ION 111 .<\1111pel l'/<111/ijj's l~eposirwn. ~ MDTlON tu
Htlld l'lulntifTs ·Motion fur Partial :S1111nnary Judgmem on Liability /\~u1~t l)r. Miclliiel
06/ L0.'2019 .-IH \Vink<!lrnn;uJ e1.ncl Nc1,'s,wth Ne:urosppme l·sicJ ~n Abty;m_,:e re 2 1 MO,TJQN 'fc;1rSu n'im1_1ry
1 Jud,;!nwm, il MOTION Ell try vf ScheduJing: Order by Mtc;fi~.,J Wi n~lm'illlll (Wi lliams.
Hubert I m 11tered: ()'~1 I()IJO I'>'1
---
.SUBT>QENA RF.TURNF.n Cxt~UE<:d re** ,14 S1J_Bl'O F,NA Ou.:e$Tccrnn ISSLr.Ehrts to
O<l/1 I12019 49 Miss_iss-ippi 13ure_!uJ ~r Nare•utic.s fo1' Prrn:lnrtlcJ11/111spec11nn . (K.l l,,.~. Retut!I rilei.1~S
MidrneJ 'Ninkelma.r111. !:,11b.p0ena served OJI 6)7/20 19, / \.\''i lli unis.. Hub~rt j lGHen~d;
_ _ _ __,1f-o_o_: _
11_,_,0_1_CJ1 _ _ __ _ __
1
l(Artachmen.rs:
Reque.~t to l,s;it1 SUUPGENA fur
'* J.
by M1rJJ111eJ
Pfotlucrio11/l 1i-spi;c.ti<in
KDM(' Spo1ts Metti'i::ine, 01'1.hopaedk & S.pii:1e-Cll 11ic ,/
[ Khihi l
Winktlln,,11111.

. J __ _
I( WlJIJmni;, Hubert.I (I:mertj'.l: 06/Ji/201!)) - - -

1
rv l91201<J 51 SUBPOF.N. A buce>"(e,:rrm ISSt EDfo1· Prot.l~jcrio11/ l11spe.cti9n to KDMC ':l pons Med,
1 01lhr,,p1tctlit· &. 5tllne t'l i 11rr, 1 l,~w is, E!ain-e) (EHtercd: o,;11w20 19)

ISlfBPOtiNA IU·; nJRNE11 5-,,:cu_terr re *~'fil S·l,,'BPOENADuces roi l \:c.um ISS UED
r 0612.0, 20 19 Prulll1ctio111111~-pe,~rin n ro K.Q,\IIC Sports Med, Orthopacdie &.Sph1e Cl~nic. (L1;w1.s·i
6frri11~_1"•·. Refltrn filed ii> /\Hchael Wia.kclrnunn. S.ubpoen~ se(vfal oil 6f2012tll9.
(Williums.:Huberri !Enter-ld: Oli/1012019/ ·
1\iI.()TlCiN ln Compd l'la1111![f .,· t>lsr::overy -k1-.vpo11.1·N
- - -l:i.Y -Defrntlam
1
- --- Nflc:hae l
I06.271201!> \\/111kelmann (kt1uehn1em~: # J E,; ttil-ii r /\_2_fH9 -0{1-03 Lettt:r to /,Jib)' RohmwJJ . # J

l II
5J l:xhJl~ir _B ..2(1l 9-06-li7 crn,,i.l frnri1 we, to ahby, II J bhfbli C: Wliikelmann OI J~pnlti
1i1aJ1agcrrr'c.11"1 policy, 11_-:l E.~hi bH D_10 l-9 06-04..emti iI rr11m nt,by lU we~. "1)', :u:cl chr(s ,)
( W"llia ms. H11 ber!J ( E'nte.re~: 0(V27t_2_0_1_1_9>_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _

06t17120 19 154 NOTICE or Hearing r~ !i'J MOTION to CompeJ /l/ai11t(/f,f fJ /.iccr,1,:ry N<',pom·e,, by
Michael Wi11k-elmaJ1n (WiUiamll, Huben) (Enterc.tl; O.o/2-712019)

I0711 6 ZOl9 55 Noncr 01- SERVICE oi' Respon,es, to lmet'r08Ul[)lies hy ~\II South Ni;urC!lipine
C.:J:m.c. (Smi1h. R<>)'l ( Ei1tereJ: 071J(//201'll
- ----- ----- --- - - -
/ ~~quest tu l~;11e S Lffi JJOF:NA for Productlom1l11spe<:ri<111 lly Mich~e.l Wi:f:ike.lri1~nn.
Q71111;WJ~ j6 (A nachmenis: // ! Exhili1t SDT_ \Valp!:'en t 1Jti6 .) ( WHLfa,:ns, iiu bert) ( F.ntc.red:
07,1712019)
---
Requesr to l~sue SllRPOENA fo,, Productin11/l1ispe.t'.tit1n b}' :\•lfchac l Wirrkeltii,um.
()7 1j 7l2fl 19 .'i7 (/\ tUH.!hnmit!! , .fl 1 E.~l'Lwil ;,lJT_IFarfo~ , # l E\ liillit SDT ~\:IC Mecli 1::al C:ilnlc./
, (William.~, Hu~.rt) 1E11tereu: 01/17 20191

rITT 18,lOl 9 158 1 $VBPOENl\. [)u_ce~ Tfcu111 ISSUED

(JP-) ( F.rife1·e~ 0711 lti20 J111
f111· Ptocl.Ucllflri/ln-spec1 kin to Jo~epli 1--ariml M. O..

- - ---- -- - - - - - -- - - -
07It81~019 t9 !$..LffiPQcNA R11ce_-s Tc.rnm ISSUFiD
W.iO
C.U nlc.. (JPi ll:.ml!rcd: 0 7/l
1(1.)MC
19)
fol' Pmducrfon/ ln~pccdon LO Merlkal
I

I1)1· ,g,201'1 S UBPOb\/A Duce, Te..-um IS.SFEIJ f.ir Pm<luc1ion/luspe,:;tio11 to Walg1'ce 11 Ct1 .. UP)

i: 1
(Entered; Q"rl1 8/20Hll ·

07/24120 J9 ORDER cfenyi1ig-pla11ulffs 1110tio11 f1•1 pttrl~iil ~11mmar) judgment, Slgried by Kent
M~Danl el on 7Z14/20J9, 1J P) 1.Enterecl:·. 07/25/201 ') ) -
' IJi/29:2.(J 19 fi2 SUl3POENA l{ETURNEO,E\~.;,1rect r:c ""' Ml S LlBPOEN,>.; :Duce~ 'i'ecum f.SSUED !'or
P1'm)u<.:ti unlll1spe~tic>11 l,;, Walgreen· Cl/ •. (JP)• "'. Reum1illed by Michael WinkeJ11uurn ,
5, 16
 T.., cnUeth f..'Jr\'t.ll l"'.Our. f)1~ill1. t.,O,,c~~t !ti iJll'li
ISubvir.:na Sl.'I V<:d pn 7'26''.20 19. (Wll linms. Huben l (Errrered: 07/29/2() 19)
SUBPOEN •\ RETURNED Exec ut~-~ M 58 SlJB POEN A Dui!es Tccam ISS_UED for
1i-i1jo12QI ':> (d .Prt,d ull-tlo'llilnspectlo11t,) Jn.\c:ph Fftrfoa M. L:i .. (]l>\h Retum"filel.i by 1V1irJ1-aeJ
\Vi.riJ;?elt1Y<1n11. Subpoerr~ SCJ've<l o n 712\)/2019, (Wi lll:rnh , fltJbe11) (ElllCtq!: fl71.l{)l2019l
Sl/BPOEN A ~F.T-.URNED Executed re h ~ .SUBPQENA Duce$ T~i: u111 IS-SlJEJ) !'or
t) ] Q .Id l?rod Ll<'Uun/ I11spec.tl on to KDMr Mei!ICI1 I Clinic:. {JP)'*, Return lik cl by i\tlJch.ael
Wlnkelm_umJ. S t11Jpoe1m s~rved 9117,'J11 2019 (\\1iiliarn.s .H.ubenl rEmer-ed: 07/30/2019)
NC)TICJ:. OJT &1=1~\I ICE OJI RtspunKes ro Re.111e$} for Produl'tiou L,y Mic h,1el
UJY ~
Winkel rrn,m1.1 Willilllll~, I Ju!JertJ 1Ent~r~(f: 08/l ;J/ 2019)

08/J j , 1OJ ~ NOTIC\ ·, l<J T ttke De-posirhm of Da111el Shoec by Mfc:hae.l Wi 11krlma1Jn, t\.Vil!i;m1s; - - - - - ---
!.iii llubertl t E11t ei:ecl. ()\ll 151201 91
- - - -
N0TJGEto ' rake Dcpos,ti11n ,~f Dr, i\'lic h_ael Wfukdniit-1111
tl 19 fil t,)' ri1,11i~.1 Shopt. d{oblnson ,
Abby Jf ~11\f'red.: 0.8i l5i2Clt9)
- -- - -
N{YI I C..El.<1 ·Lake Deposh1mr (J,· 30 b () witness b-.i'-Pan iel S!ittp,c, I ({clbinsm1. A.bbyl
UJ9 tlli I(Eirterecl: OR I 5~(1 1())
I

~] ') 61.J NOTJCh m ·T11k~ Depotlt1rm nf D,u,iel Shope by Ne.w SoulJ1 N'euros11lne. Cfirnc-. cSm1th.
Roy I ( F,nrered.: 08/ 15120 I~)
- -
O!IJ NOTICE to T!tke Dep11~i1io11 M Dank! Shripc: by Mf, ltaef Wh1kelmann. (\Villiams,
31 Hubert) (falJerect: 08/13/201 9)
- ---
QS,r 5/2() 1'J NOTICE to 'rake Deposlllnn ,,,f "Pluim1ff. Daniel ·Shope fi)' N~w SO.LL~h 'Neurospirre
Clinic. !Smith, r{o_y l ( Enti.-n~d: 0811 5(,10 [ 9)
1)8/~81:!019. J NOTICb OF SERVICE or Response~ lo Req11e$1 for Pit>duc_tlvn by 1\lfi ~hael
Wi11ke.Jnu1mr, (Wi lll~nb, Fluhc.1111 En lercd: Ofl/28/20 19 1 ·
1
/ HRtZ~i?OJ9 Requcs1 lO Issue S lJI3POENI\ fH1· l'roduction/l11Npect[1:11l by Mlfltarl Wl.ukelma11n.
CWi(Jium,, Hu!Je-111 CPrir<'i Ni: 0Si29120 19)

H DESIGNATIO N nl' \Vi tness Rr 11,1 flcul by Po11ii<' I She 1Je , {Attad1111e.ms: YI l Ex hi.bit
:__ j Plnl ntit'fs cx:per't C'V V.1 ( ~1,hlnstin, Abby J (:Ernerecl: 08/29i2t11 m__ __

08/JQQOL9 ],S r Civil Sl! B~OF.:iNA_Duce~ Tr(;11m l;)SUEil) as- \0 .Gl A~~.oriateS:& .Ei1doswpy (:en1erfor
1•n,ctucuon, IJ1Spe, t1 on. 1KJ I ('.Ellle.r!!tl: 08/31)/20 19)

I0.$ I~r,
sl0/10 I~ Civil fDuce, SUBP.OEJ~A
Pmd11c.tion/ln~p~~1ion I~J\ \E11tere.cl: 08/30/2.0191
.!ll
-tlv_e._O_rt-i c.-e-.~-('\J-'
Tecurn 1S$U l'IQ .-L'i.- to-.-/v
' -l E_._A_l_\cl_11_1i-n-is-,m-
. ----1

I08,30,:10 w t.u..t vPrc;,t:llli:ri-011/)mlpecuun

il SLIBPOEN/\ but:e~ ISSUED Q.ui nn Hcallhc3re. ELLC for
CKJ) (EnlereJ : 0~/30.'2,1 191
Tccum ::is ~o

08!3012019 Civil SLJlii:>OENA D.l.lee-.~ Te~ um lSSlJ ED as fo Oki Cn,non Dll ntul Care.. i11c.for
Pmuuc:tii:>11/f n~-pectii>n, (KJ) ( ~nror~d: 081ID/20 t 9)
- - - ---- - - - - -- - -
C:ivil SUBPOE.-NA D,u~e.,~ T11.:um ISS~IED ns lo Matll-s!Jn C-a11toJ1 Med Cl1nic for
P1'(ld1iclfo n, li1~pe.: ti mi i' K.1) ( h1 I<' red· OS1;\0!10 I!->)

Ol>,,3012019 I l!O Ci vii ."11 JIJ PO FN \ P111 e~ T¢(:1Jm I$SU 8J :-ts to Ihitot:h) C. O.ien . M 'D. for
---------
Pn;11Ut,ri<m I 11.> ~ .ct101t. 110 J (Entered: 08!30/20 J9\

J ()8 ';H.l/2() 1•> Iil Sl1l3PCJEN A Duces·T~,·!lni IS:Sl IEI) for Prrxlm,tiowllispeetio11 iO W,r1Te11 Bio kit
I Maharrey.DMD. fJP 1rfmaed: 0813012()~ _
I _ _ _
J SH l3POEN r\ Duce., Tt'l'lilll ISS L' Ep fQJ' Pioductl1)11lf~pc.rtion t,rC0111prohen~1 \'C Phin
 J C.i.:11tei· 11f Mls,,issf!!Pi . (JP) (l::n.r<: 1·od, 08/:l0/2 0 I 9)

Ol!/'.!()120 J9 fil S.Li~·POl~NA DucNfT.-1;1w11 ISSUED Fc>r Procli1ctlot1/ln~pection 10 Uulvershy r;rf

Ml~sissfp-pi Medkal Cente r. (,IP>11:mornd.: !lS1J()/20l 9J

I OS1JcJ12o I 9. Ii:! ISll'RP8~A P i,ces.T<, U111 ISS ~ fiD fen' Pr~'.<illctfou/ lnspec.uon Brnoldla'Ven A1tes!h!!~tll
,nicl Pai II i\.1-gr. I Le;v1s. cL'iwe J ! Emcreel:· OS130l20 I 9)

~ Si30n 019 lfi SURP(!ENA Duccs T~cu1:ii JSS1_1 f.D [oJt Prod·udfonilnspeetlon So. PrimNry C'.l.l re,
(Lewb , f.111.lne) (Emcred: 08/'.\0/20 I9)

' OS1J()t20 JQ lki ,SlJBPO.ENA Duc:e., Tecum I_SSIJED for ProduCJ.mn/ Jm;pectloi.r w S1.J,)c;n1iflk Ucspillil.
(.f Pl (D ile.red: OSl'.lo,io 121
~
- - -- - - - - - --
O~i;i0/20 I ~J fil .S UBPOENA D;ice~ Ti:(;um ISS UED for Preductitm/lnspec1io11;.S,1, Meclklll Cure'.
!-
(Uwi, , l::ln11m) 1b1rerecl: O$/j 012l) fg1

Oli/'*0120 I!l· llS SUF3PQENA. Ou!-'~>. Tee.urn rss.ld:E:I:) for Prcdut:'tionll11spec,itJJ110 Prc11li.e1' P~ ifl
C;irv,P.C::' . (.fPJ ( l::n ternd: 08/Jll/~019}
·-
0$i30!2J)J 9
-
80 S UB.PQEN.\ D.u_ec~Te.cum ISSUED for P rodm~don/f11~pectii:iJ1·Region 8. lLtwi,,
Ela, nu ,<E mere.<l: 08/30/201 91

OS '30fl019 _2il SIJBP.QENA Duce~·1ec ulll 1SSU ED for P.rodactioli/ ln~ix,cri nn t,) Olniw·iltim l
(~11deru,M.D.. (J PJ inruered: 08/J0/2()1 9)

I OS/30/20 I') 2.l ISUHPOEN.':\ l)u~<10e.euu1 rs.sum for Produi:tion/ln~pection Me1it ;!~!lit~ lvfocli~\I ,
Oro11p. (Lewis;, El:iine 1<Emered: 08i30/20 19)
-
O!l,JCl/.20 I <J 1)2 'SUEiPOE NA Due~ ren1rn L'-S lfED ror l'roclm:-1!0111l 1ispeerion Cupiful _Orthv. (Lcl'lfs,
U1::iina) ( E11!e1:ed: 0~/30!2019)
-- -
OR/J0/20 I 'l 9:, SUBT'OE.\i.'\ DtL_c~i Tc.:um 1.SSU f:D tor P.ruduct]un/hrspe-ctlon UJ'l1log.r A£l!QC 1.f MS,
(Le\vi.s •.Ehrn1el I Eme.rnd: 08::l-0(20 j 9\
j CPRTIFfC.,v'E Or SER\ fl"'.!: by Du; 1,:,I Sliope /U!Q Ul'.ST POii S f)Bl'Ot•:N,·\
r,l8l30/2019 94 ( Rohi/1SQJ1, A bbyj Modfficd on !)74,20 19 (lle 11dtF$Oil , Ki rl:iy ). ·1-0ocRErrNO.b~R'OR a

SEb J\NNO'LAT fO !'i LlELO\\' I (Emcred: 08l~Oa6 I 9)

- - -
CT~Tlfl('_,i,:J'E 6F SERVICE by Michael Wi11k'elmun'n SUBPOHNA C!Tti .t:NSH//'
OS/30/2019 ~ AND JM,\ f /GRA7"t()NS (Ro.bl n,~n. AlibyJ i\ilt.ldirrecf on Q/4iiOi.9 /Henderson. Kirby ),
[QO('K.ETIN(.i ERROR -SEF. .·\ NNQTA110 N BELOWf {µll!re\l: 98/301.20 19) ..
09 '03:'201 ' I flli. Civil SUBPOENA Due,;;, Tec11m IS_SV P.I> th to I lnited.Srat;;-s Ci tiz.e.ns imd l1:mnlgruti0n
~
Scr~'i~es·for l'r9~ucllnni.lt1.pe<'lit111. ( KJ) ( J::.nt;.>red: 09/ttl/20 J \J) ·

09/U.1201-9 !)7_
I viiCi SUB!>OENA Dut es T-e,·u.miS:';(lEi;) IIR to /llli-ssis,,1pJii $tate Board ol' Medlen!
Uc~n~e for Prnd11ct1L1111ln~pe,1io11 . t l(J J ! Entered: 09/03£10 l 9 )
I-- O~tW.2019 !tll
l l/1~ l
,uh 1 ·d I •
',~'I Ir, JI '
,
~' lU 2_{, <i:\ ! 111 utrt:~n ·• ~~11.:! ,~, dt l
. l H.enclc1 S1)r1. Kirby J n=.ntcrcd: O<i1Q4!?_0 I '))
~!,•1.l .d \ll 11 11~

. - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -1
0~ 0412() I \/ ~ <) Requl$t to ls~rie $UH'l 'Ql]I/A ru1· ProJuc~f<>n1hispection by l)amcl She1,~. (Roninse11,
Aflby) (Enl~rcd: 09/W/20191

Ul)/0·1·2019 I ,oo R~ jj.l.Cj,T to f;;~_u_e <,1JBPOF..;_\iA filr Pr,,ductf()n.'Lnspec.iien by E>anld Sht>pe, rRot>ins~u.
•\ llhy I I ~Ilk.led ' 09/04 2(119 I
uwos zn I Y ill! .s Ull POENA RE.TURNED l~'<eeJJl~,I r~ Jll $.W:if'OENA bu~es Tee um----
d 18:iUED fo1
I Pri~ductfo11/IJ1~11en icm \,lerit .Health Medical CTroup. rLc:wi~. i:;J.1i 11e )"'" . R~nim lfl~cL5y
Mich"d Wfok t'l mann. Subpoenu ~e,·vcµ on·W4!201<J. (~'tl li'ai11s, Huhern (Enle.red:
09/05/20 I \I I
 u I ?11:11

l
~

(lW05120 I~ 10.:!
S:UBPOb\J1\ RETUlNBD Exec11ted re ~• ~ <;'iVil SU.EWO,ENA ()uc.~sT ~_ctrm JSSUF.D
os rQ 'l'Jmothy C. Chei1 , M. I) . tor P ri1<lu~'itQullnsp~c tfriu, (KJ )""'. Ri!turn fiJedbr Michael
Wi11ke.l ma11n. S11bpucn.1 ~¢rved on 9/-<112(11 9. (Willia nu . Hubert) (Emered: 09/ 0.5!10H/)
- - --
SVBPOENA RET lJRN l-:-D Exee~ il re"'- 93 s=tJHPQENA pu~·e,~ le.ci1ti1 JS$U f':J) for
j 09,o5Jio I~ J!l"I P1wucrin11/l nspcc.11011 I rrology ~s~oc of MS. (I~ w Is, Elarne)""'°. Return fi led by Michnel
·\,\ilttkd tmtnn. Subpoena scne,d tm IJ/412019. ( \Vi[IJ:i n'"'. l lubc/1) !Enteret;I: 091C)S!20191
---
SUSP<)cNA RF'i'URNEJ/ EX<-1;ulccl re ~it'l•1;t i vil SUBPC>ENJ\ Ouc.:es··tec.u111IS.SUED
091 05,''.;{) 19 ,\s lu M:t.dison Canion Me.d Clt ni .:-- t',~r Pro<luction!ln;.1J_~ctio 1L Cf<.I )*"*. Re.[tJrn til.c.t.l by
.J.M
Michael \Vh1k~lrnunn. SU!111oenu s~rwtl un W~/'20 I 9, (Wllli1tr1Ti, Hubert, tl:n1ert:tl:
09t05/20 I C/1
I SUBPOEN A RCT LJ l~NED 8;i:.:1rtecl rn *'-IC' SUBl'~)R'N/\ Du1.:es.Tceu1u. lS$UEDTor
0911)5; 2.0 I <J ·Pr0dui;li1in/lns~l'tion to Ctimieh,,nsl~t:1 l':ili) G'enter of Mis,rlsi;~ppL (JP\,>•-. RC-!uru nled
by Michncl \VinkeLmmn. S11 bpcem1 ser~'ed (111 9/412 019. (WlUia1it.~. Tlubert) (E ntered:
09/05i20 11))
- - -
S8BP08NA RETU~EJ)J:x;ecmed-re n 75 Civtl SUBPOENA D1.1ces T~·cum fSSHED
09/05,"2019, a~.to GJ Assoclmes & Endoscopy Center for PJ'Qdv~;(i1JJi/lllspec.1fo11. (KJJ••. Remm filed
b.;y Micli,1el Wir1k.-lma1111. Suhpoe11ff ~~rved 011 9!4/'2 O!Y. (Wil lhuns . H uben) (Et;ter.ed:
09/Q3/2019)
- -- -- --
: ST,l J·lPOEN!\ RET£11{\/ED G"ecu1ed te"'" ~ SIJBPei£NA D uces 'lee.um ISS·Ulill for
()<Jt0:;11019 1
Pro.duc1Jnrrllh.,p1oetion Gapi:wl O nho. ( Lewis-, El,1ine )"'*. Rc1Ltrn tiled ~Y lVH,·liAo!
[ Wi:okdmann . S11bpoenu , ervCctl on 914/2Q!9 (Willia ms, f! Ubl'rt) (F.mer«cl: 091()512019)
NOTI<:'J:: nr ni'Serv,ce of Response and dh1ecti-Q11s 1,, Notlt:~ of De~o,ili6n of

!-----,~ I
()9/0CJ/20 l 9 1.W:!. New.South NeuroNpine 30!b)(6l W ittie~, hy N1•w So mh Ne11rospl11i,. f :liJiic R-e hill Noitcc
1 td Take Dcµusi ll Dn /Sm llh, Roy I \Eniercd; (l\)/0~:11io 19)
f:SUl:lPOENA RETURNED Exfr11fe<l n.• "'~ 81 Sl,) Eil'OENA Due.es Tcs:um fSS·UED for
,,-wt, l!>1 rrnduc1ion/l nsp1.\Ctim1 1~ U11J v.,.rsfty of'(Vli_s~i,.,ippi Nledic-01 -Ce,;ter. (JP)'". Hcr:orn filed
l~y Mlc;huel \.\li11keJrm11111 Subpoena served on 9/(iJ?.01 9. (Williams, Hutien} (!:,11tercd:
1owci~o 1'> )

09 f>CJ/2019-

0911l9/iO I9
F
__

ill
S.l 'FlPOB'-lA_F_{ El
_'U-tf<-<NED E-\ec11ted i:e ~'1- lk, SIJE!'POENA Duces:Tec;.urn IS..Sl,J ED fQ1
l'rotlm:Uon/ln~pe.ction to S1. Dmnlnk I lospirnl. (JP) *", Return filet.l by -1\1kJ1a~I
Wln ktlrn:11111. S11hp~1~n.~ ~.;rve(l 1.,11 \l/6t:W I2. {\VJ!! i~ins, Fflibe·n1 fE11Lered: 09/09!2() I'J )
SrJHP() ENA RETUR,\fl,:l)Tixoc utecJ r~ +.. 88 SUBPQf.NAD.ui;.;-~ Tc·cani ISSI JFD.for
Pmducdunllnspcctlon ti.' Prcniier -P~JJ1Cire)'J.; . l JPJ""· Re,turn filed by Michael
--

Wink,dma1111. Subpoen~ .~i!r\;ecJ 0119./6/.2019. (Wil lia ms . Rubert) (Ei1ten.id: 0~/{)9/2()1Y)

SUT31'QEN,\ f{cTURNE'D Exc1;u1ecl re u fil SUBPb 8NA Duce.s Tccum lSSUID n,r - ·
09 0'.)/2f!l9 JI 2 P.1 o<lu_µ1ion! ln~pec.:ii 0n 1,1 Warren Bl.!lke Ma hn1ny,DJ\iID. tJP.l*-", Relurn iilt!~ by Jvlieh.1d
Winkeltnm1n. Subpoe:rrason-ed tlli 9/(i/20 19, [WI IIIH ni,. H ubert/ {Ei11'e r~(t 0W09/20 19J
l---~-

IOIIIIW/20 l9 ill
SlJ8POfu'1A R.ETURN I::r:i Executed re •• 2ii ~'UBP011.\JA Duces Tecurn ISSUED l'n r
- . . -
f'rodi,ellon/Jnspeetlon lt'.l Olmumti111I Bader<;t.M.D,. (J Pl*" , l~etum ifl.e.tl 1.,y Mkh.iel
~

- ~Vi11~elm.n11:1,Suh:711,~111 ~e.rverl e1i_?l6!W I\), (. 1\11

.· 11 lu ms~ Hubel'{) {Enternd_
: o~_0!/20 IYI I
/i~lBPOENA RFI URNED bxccutecl re"'~ 89 SUBPOENA D\JC~~ le,;um J-S-:i.l llill for
j O~t0!)/2019 _i ll
IProd1u;r1011/lr1~pecdon I<e~uli 8 (Lewh, El:iiue)*" Return filed ·b_y Mlcinte l
W[nki,;-Imm111 Suli1jot;Jlu , crv¢,I on W<,1201.9. (Wi li iams. I litbcrtl li:nterect: 09/0W;Wl9)
I
QE)/()9/20 J9 ill 1
8lJBr 0 ENA RITTURN l-:D E>,~~uted re "'"-TI-CivU Sl,'lSPOENA Duce$ Tc~,um IS5lJ5D
ffs to Quimi Hi,al1hrarc, PU,(' for Pmcfurrioulluspec1ion. (KJ)*' ,'Re turn filed liy

KIM
 Vtl ~O! Q l \\e11a~tb Circutt ('\1ur:t l>; •i.flti•OQt~'t"I R.c~,11

~
Mi\:hael ,vlnkelimmn. s:uhpoena SCl'l'c.'d on ~/Si2019 . (Wil Iiams. Hu~en) (F:ntercd:
09/0')IZO l 9 l

I09/0'.lliO l 9
-I ..!.l!!.
SUllP(.ll:>.;A RF:JURNEJ:i Exetured re '"" 76 Civil SL1BP08i'.J 1\ Duces Te:.:11ni lSSU En
as to ME,\ Acl111i llfSll'l'tU I e Office for Prodlll:.) lu1i/ l11.~pt~.tlc.1n, ( KJ )*", Re,1Ur11 ·fi letl b.)
Michru.~I Wlnltelm1111r1. Suhnoe1rn serv~Li IIP 91512019. (Wllli~ins. Hubecl 1(Emcrcd:
09109120191 .

~UAf'()ENA R.ET llRNED Ex~euted rt•• ,ll. fivil S'UBl?OENA Duces1ee.11Jn ISSUED
09!09 io 1<:>
1
.u: a.s to Ok! Cmmm Dt>rit:il C:1re. lne. for P~,1duc1ion/!nsiret-tlort. I KJ )"'*. f,etm11 tiktl..by
M1c.lmili W1nk<!l 111ann. )>11 IJpOerlu served l>n 915/20 I <J, ( Wil liair1~. f-luben ) (Emcred:
Ql;lrOO/'.!O J 9) .

Request to l~sue SUBl'OF.NA fo1· Proch1c11on/!1:is11e.c1i1.111 by Mlcl1a~ I Wfnkc!ma1111.

O'Ji I J/2(J J9 (Altaehm~tl~; #-l Exhibit'ST)T Comprche11,iive1:?nl.11.Cen toer,) ( Willlam1'. H.ube1il
( Enfi;red: 09/1112!/ l ~)
ow 1_212_20_1_9 _j ill ::>UBJ>.O ENA l'jS\).EL) 1,l l. 1I Entered: 09111120 L9 )
ReqtLest tu l'>s!le SLIBPOF,!',1,-\ for Proc.1.t1ctinnllns1~~<;tJ.·c,ii l!Y .M.iclmd Wirrke.l1nn11n.
0911212{1 I f) I lAtrachmcnt!o ./1. l Fxhiblt S.DT_J:1ckgm Ane.,theslft earn CeJ1ter. #&.Exhibit
S~T_Jacl.wn Pot11 ee.11ter. l;\i Exltibh SDT mcnt h.e11!th rivcn:i;,ks, it11-:~t1i1Jil
SDT~m~rlthealth.c:,cntrnl. # 5J:i.xllihil Sl.Yf"_ms:Sp11rtsm~di.cin~. 11 .ci €xhJ.b1t S OTdt
L I
, dOmfnli: 11~urn~C'ience C£1llU,J ( Wi1!fa1}1$, Hulitrt) tEmeretl: (,)9J 1.2/2019)
- - - -- - -- - --
Oti. Ij 1:W1 lJ SlJ IH'O G'<;\ Duce.. Tecu111 ISSIJ P,I) mJackson Ancstbe,~fo Pai11 Center for
ill Producilonl l11~pcetro11 1,YI..\ l r E1iteJ'e<l: 09i 13120 l9 J ·
- - -- .
I 09: I 3/2019 S\J I! POE'//\ Duce; Tccurn I SSl I FU to Jud(~611 rv,in Cenlt!r fcir l'r.oductJ ,111/1 n..sp.ertf on
1(!11)\l
.
( Eitter'e.d: OCJ/1 :>-~019)
.- ---
STH:lf'O.ENA Du.:e~ Tecu111 I.s~lfF.l) rn 1\~erir lic.illt!i f¢r .Pt'Qducrlonllri~-pecticm (MA)
ill . CF.111er¢d:
r 1J/2l)l9 0911 3;'20 i'JJ
1
(>CJ! 13120 19 SUB f'(>l:lNA Duce.;; 1'Ec11111 IS.SUED 111 \II~ ~POlb Medk in'e for Pi'\ltlJJi:1 ion1lnspl.lctio11
(MA ) (Entered: 09 1.iii019J
- -~-
09/ 13120 f') SllBl:'OENt\ Drrt-e~ l"erurn ISSUED to S.LPorninie for P'rnrll t(:tiori/l.JiRµee.tifo1t Eiitet~d·
OWl:3/Zf)f91 .
~I
Lei\ SUlfPOENA l)ui:ci Te<.l1111 ISSU.ED Lcl M_erit Ue11JtJ1 Rivet Oaks for
P-rm.Juc.:tionll.J1.,.pc~tlnr1 I~L.\ I (E nterell: 119113120 l$1)
- --- - -- - - - -- - - - - - - -- - i
SlTilPOENA l'Zf;nJRNEDExec11reel 1•c O 8l 8 UIJPQJ:NkDu~es Tccunt JSSVE:D for
PrQduclit.1ri1ln\])Cc:-1tci11 t11 ('omprcheusive l'atn CentGr of M ii,sis:n.pp1 . (lPl"", R~turn ti te<l
I0911612<-)-19·--t J27 1
hy i\,'fidmd 1~ inkdma1111. Subpoena se!'ved fm 0/l)f20 J9. ,William$, Huber1 l Mtidl:fii:d OIL
9/ 17/20 19 1.KJ). ~DOCk.J;,lNG l'i°RROl< ~EI; ANNQTATI@N BELO\V'1 ()~,i~rt!<l:
. OW l 6!20f.9)
- -- --
SlJllPOENA RETURNED Bxetuted r:c ~.. 8.S S UJJPQE."IA TI11ces TecHm ISSUED for
O'>t I l.l/2019 ~
1 > ):
Pmduct1owlnxp¢c1io11 ~() Prfi11nry ·Cafe, (Lewis. mai rte)°"f Remm filed by Mi.dmel
1 Wink('lrrut11i 1. S11bpo,\111r~1:veJ on 9!412019. ! Wil lin ms. Hubern (.Emc!'ed: 09/1 l,120 l 'J J
, -
O<l l i',.20 I'I I 2.9 L111f I ' llilt l I ~- I, 111 •1 1111 •I
I,,, • I '" 11 . 1k.J1 (Emer,!<l: O\l, 1712019)
IS48POE_NA RETl:RNf::D Ext~9u.1.cd re ..~ 1l 9SU.BP0ENAISSUED (IL1*• .R'C{lll'll
091( 7/2(lt9 ti1¢d l:J.y \\·llchnel Winklllmam i. S11bpoena serve,! 01191U /20[9. (Willi;un;,., l±uliert)
(Ente re<k 09, l 772019) ·

1J11(1
 1w.emi-cm L'fr:oth Coun IJtnnct Dock.SI :RCpurt

l'.\ I S:UBPOEN.11. Rf:1 lJRNB1 Exe<Uted r..: .,. fl7 Sl lfl:1:'(lENA Du~sTeeum [.S-SUbl) for
Produc,ion/lnspec1in11 ~,,. Mc<rirnt C,ire·, (Lewis·: Elaine)"". Return fi h,•d..by Mi.dtael
Winkelmunrr. Subpo~na servei,I w1 9/f>/2919. ( William~. ltLLher11 I EnteTe<l: .U9/ I 7.'2<l I 9)
·s UBPOENJ\ RETlJl{Ni'::iJ ,~~ccmcd re•• 84 SUBPOF.NA D11ccs'Teci1m l.SS UEl)f0r
0.91J7/ 2019 Pfoduc.tio111I.iispec.tinn Arookhaven 1\rnistlre.s-il'l.1111<1 P11hi l\1gr. (Lcwl$, Elnlne)h. Ret1.!r11
Fi l¢d l?y Mit;hllel Winkel ni:aun S 1lbjl1)el1a ~e_rved un-.!://412() 19. (Wi111ams. J l ubenl
(Entered: (J'J/Ji/:lOIQ)
-------------------
Mpn o NW (.,lu:1sh I'<! Qu Re4ue,t tu l!t~Ue Subpoena I.Jy Def~mEmt Mi.chaecl Winkel rmmn
U9/ l112.J1 19 ill t ( Wi Ill am, . H uoern !To!en.,"'(f: (191 1711019! ~

09117/2(} I<) l,.l MEMORANDUM ltrSuµp<'ln re 111 MOTION lo Qtrnsli r~.~ R-eque.st to ls$.ue I

~'''~'""
------
-+---,~RE
J:1-f by
5.ubpocmt by Michael Winke lma nn. (WilJimns, Hubert) (Einered: 0.91171.1019)
---'S-P0NSE in Oppi.:oSiliu11 Fe 13.i MOT ION 10 Quash re ~ 1{e(1ucsr ro Issue Sahp<>e n<1
l);rn1el Shope·, !Rohln~on, Abb;>) (Entered: DWI:S/20l 9)
- - -- -- - - - -- - - --:
l
091j 812.0 19 MEMD"RAN DUM ln oppo~!tk•n re LU MGT'l'ON to QL•ash re~ Reque$l Ln Iss ue
lli Subpoena b~· Danicl Sh0pe. ( Rotnrison, Abby) l Ente.red: 09118{201 9)
SlJBPOENA Rr.Tl!RNEO Exe,·ute.d re•• 2Z Civil ;s Ll!lP()TIN!\ Due.is Tee.nm ISSUiii
O!i, iJ/2019 as to MJ:ss1ss1 ppi ·StRtc BourJ of Medical 1.leense for Produeti(:)11/Jnspt?ction, (IO)"'* ,
ill Return liled ej D.a111el Slwpe, bubpoenJt. llt:rved L'li Wl2/20l9'. (Rob11is¢n • .-\bby}
(E11tcr,;<l: ()W23/'2019)

Request LO L%'1te $.U HP.OGN;.\ for·Pmdut'tio1i/ lt1!l1J~l'Llrn1 l:iy Mlch:iel W!i1~dr i i ; i ~

lALiuch m'erirs: # J Ex lli lii1 Sl)'l _tih~rit ht:alt h rnedic31 gro11p.J (W111rn ms. IJubcn~ .. J
tEmered: 09/''1/20L91
SlJB PO ENA Du<:t'i; rc,um ISSUE!) for Producti(>n/lns~ecti on m wrerh rle:ilth b>kJkul
1
- -- --4----
I
09,241zO l9
Cir:oujJ reuo.r<l., cus.odian. <Lewis, b lolneJ (Etltcred: 09(24120 19)
- - - - -- - - -- -- - -- 1
IOW2.:512f.l I9
I0911-5/Wl)) - ,-,-~-,-,-/1-
I REl3 U'l 'l'AI~ Tn re 133 ,'vlOT!ON to Qua~h re.119 Reques1 t0 Issue Subpoena by Michael
\\'!nkelm111111 (\Vil li;1111s. l lubenl I Entered: 09125/;2019) ·

1(:iTION h". Stri.k.~ by Pfnli~1lfl' Daniel Shope· IAltuchmcms: 111 exhlbll copy oJ' P.rrftt\\

; ;i l?Ol? 1~--· --- ~hee-t•.) 1 i&Oblll.\On. A bb) \ (E11tere<I: OW2..'W201'9)

i\·1F..NfO R.!-\ NDUM ln Su11pu11 le Ml Mf>Tl'ON rn·Strike 1:>y Ba111el Shope, (!{obm~on,
Abby) (Emer,.d; Q91~/20J 9)
- -- -
O~DER- S~uJ.nii Pre ("t~.1Conference t'or l 1, , ift ~l 2;00P.M and ,! ury '.!'r-i11_I ,;e.db, ll 13/20
09/25l20f9 I
al O?OO AM 111 ll~nkiJ1 Gou111Y. Courth0l1se l,1:tore Kem M t'l) an,~I. S1{t1U1J.! hy Kem
r - - - - - + - ~1-i\_k_D_n_n_le_·i_o_n_lJ_~,25/2019·, ~jl l'vhl!l ilie<l 1>1i 91251io19 (aj ). (I;11,t_er~1I; 09/Z.~/2(HQ/
I SUfWC..JEN,·\· RE'I URNED Ex·ec11rcd re *~ 114 SUJ;P.OF.NA q 11cc.s Te~urti TSSUITD h)
0912.6!201 Y ill

-
M~ S]'1''f!5 IV!~.c1 ne fo1 Pmd1(d ion/ lJi-sp~cli011 (fvti\ )",; Rtil II n1 ii le<l by i\oficftacl .

t
Winkdm~1'u1. Su_tlpoemt ;:;Gr,e<l ~1n IJ/20/20 19. (\\ ·i i Iiams. Huh.en ) [lfareretl: Oli/ 2612()1 9)

SUBPO)=l'\l,-', RETLJRN~fJ fi;,;ccutetl re *"' Ul SUBPCiF.NA Duce., Tecun1 rsSUED to

O'J:lf.i(JO I !J lm:IGl;>I\ i\ne$1hesia Pain Center fur Fru1.h1ctioi11l,1sp1tctl11n (MA,~ • Ren.rrn filed by.
l-16. Mit!hnel. Winkclinam1 ::iubp0011a·se.rved on <)12oi2019, (Wi ilinms, Hubert) ( r.lite1e~I:
(J()/2(, 120191 .

SUBPOENA RCTVT<:l's 1::15 Exccl1Le.J re *- 12n SUBl'Or..NA Du..i,.;s Teci1111 ISSUE.]) ro

Mi'.r-il Heal th Rlvtff Oaks for PmtlllC[ loniln spe,c~l()II (M Al"'' . R<l.llrni Al~~ by lvua,a.~I
WI nkelml,1111 Su ~11,;ie.J1u ~.ervg1l t'n 9/10/201 9 ( \Vi Ilimiis, Hu bi::n J ( cnrcrul: 0W2Mi0 19 1
---
SU13f'CJENA RET!JRN8) f:..~ecutcd
... re"'"'
... Ll.l S Ul3
......-- . POENA
. Duccs Teellm 1SSUED10 ~

ll)/16
 I~tnti1'11;\ Ou. uH r uurt IJt,mq.~,c__utt f<'CJlQL1

L J~.l tiii l:kal th Fnr Prndltction/ ln.:;pec:~i~n <MA)• <i< R'et~m fi led 1y Michael Wluke.lmaru1~ .
. ll

S'u bpoerm served un 9/20(2019, ( \\1111 rn111s, ]:lube rt) (hnl~red: 09126J2019)
- ---
SUBPOENA J{ETURNF.D bxecuie.d re •• J.J2 SUBPQ.E.I\IA Dute~ Tecum ISSVITT> t,~
OW2<ii 20J9 St. Domin ic for'Pro<lucti1-1nllllit,ec1(n~*' , ReUu11 nJcd L;y, Miclf~eJ ·win kdmrrnn. J
Subpi,enll'servcu. u1i 'N:W/2019 t WrlJiam;, Ritb~n J (ErHered: 09!26!20J9\

09/26/20 I t)
ll -5-0- - ' - - - -- --
ORD'ER Setth1g J•re-t11ul C(l tlfrrence t'io1 4 ' 14110 a, 2:-0QP/vl arid.Jury Trilli ~el for
4/'.!7!'20 ill 09:00 A11·1in Ra111d.11Cpumv t:ourill{)u:;e hcf1'1re K.ent McDrn1id. Si g:ncd bv
Kent MtD:rn l~I M !19/1(>1ZOl9, (UJI I E;H~red: ()0/26/20191

NOTl<.;E OF SER\' ICT, of ~csp,'•JtS~$ to Rcqut,JJt for PJoduction hy Michael

- •
-

ill Wi11kd1m1nn. ( Wil Hams. llubcm rEmer~d: 0(~/27/2019)

------ --
RE:.'i PONSE j 11 OtiPcl~:tl1n1 r~ Pl MO'l"IQN l£> ~trike 011d Objrtl'/ to Defmda11t.1·Errnrd
Sh~t..l tn Change. tll1: Swom Dl'pvs11/011 Tr1.1·ti111(111.v rt/ D<1/e11dw1/ Dr. Wi11kelmamt by
10,0212019 ,\1flchoel Wlnkelmunn. (/\tlliehnie1lU.: 1/ l ExlHl,lit A to Pr. \;Vinkdm11rw 1~ respnnsenmtion
11111trll\, # ~ E.xJli l1if B to Dr, Wirlkelirn111i1's respon~~ moti:otl 10 ,mk, # 1 Exhl mt C ro Dt'.
Winkel11Jiui11'\: 1·e,P.onse niodon lu slrik . #,d ExhfbtrD U'> Dr. Wir1kclrnunri's res_pon~.c
mo11 011 Lo ~crik.\ c\v1111nms. H ubert ) t Emcr~d: 10102/2()19)
. _,
I SUBPOFNA RETI RNED E.~&111ed re •• IJ.9 SlfB.P!)Ei\J/i Duces Tecu.r11 ISSUED rpr
I 01(i4!1fl 19 _l5J P.ni>d uc.tior1•111,']Jecno11 LL• Me;ir Ht1i)l1l1Medical Group i·¢.,1mJ~ cn~todi.11i . l Lll.wi~.
Elllh1e I*''. R,<)°LU)ll fil~d b) ~Ui.:bai?I \Vi 11kdrm,11 m. 5ubpoona ~en-i:d on 9/27/2019.
I (Wllli,1111~, Hutkrt) tEnt~rcd: IO/Q-11:?LJJ9)
- -- -- -- -- -- - -- - -- -1
r J() 1s, 20 I ':I .Li:!. NOl'1Cf. of Hcllri11g_r~.l 'I, ~10'J'l0N tu .Qyash re .22 Rseque.s{ lo ls-see Subpoena l}y
Ml i;hacl WinktlrtHlli/l ! W1Ili.n11u;.. l:luben i (Emer.ed: l0/l :V20 l 9 )
~ ,-
DES IONATI ON ofWi111es~ (lli:µ1:rt/ hy Mlt;lia~I Winkdmttnn. (1\nacl1 mems: 111
fll/ LV10IQ I13'5 Exhibib.,\ Wlnk.elm~nn CV,#~ l::xhiba B.:..1:!lm111t_CV,t1 ,il;;xhib11 C lngrilln c\,:j
L .. ---1- I
I (Willuun:,. Hubert ) ( L'.Jttere..l! JO/ L5!.2019i - _ _ _ __ _______,
DESIGNATION of WI me$$ bY- New Sourh Neurospi1l(l. Clrnic. (A ll!lchmeJlis: // l J~-~ htblt
1()/ ti120 j 9 15,; !A Stnn·T . ~nim. E,tjuhe.'i/ 1 'Exhibi l B Pl1 ilip J, fllotml. J\•10.) ( Smlt.h , 11.o)') I f'1u,1,rc<l:
10/ 15/20191
- - -- !---
I 0/ 16 12019 h f Firlit MUTlQN ro Su·ik~ 1'ih nes12.41ation nf Wi'tnes:~ by Ph\.iuiiff [')1111Jcl Shor e
( 1<.obi nson, Abby) ( l:imeri:u 1()1I C?iZU 19)
- -- - - --
i Amended MCiTION to 5u,lke JM.i Q~,:1g11..rio.u or Wimc.ss by Pl.riiitifl' Danld Si1op~
10/ 16/20 19 b8 (.Attaclm1ent~: 'ft l ~hihil NIUiil fr('l1l ai tNll~Y 1N~l"'dll1a·-i.(l E.xJi lhll.e.mnil fr0m ll lr)'.
ui{im~i,) (R,)ul11~or1, Abby i t f-.olered; f0/l 6ri0 l9 )-
I 01 1611.0l '9 i-=-1
I~
~JEtvJORAND~I ~11 Suppv11 r¢ 158 A rnencfed_-fv- 'il<-_e_I ;'\fJ Dcs1 gnati 0n of
JT_TO_N_'t_o_S_1r_
lO_

I IO j 61"'01
' -
1 () I ~
J6" r
Witn~,, by D:mrd SJmpe t Robuison• .!.bby) / Emel'ed: J0/ 16/2019)
NOTICE of I lenri ng re J 51! .\,m'llded i'.vlOTION to Strike 150
J D1miel Silo~ t Robln,,nn, ;\ l)byl (Entered: 10/lri/2lJJ9\
o~..·-1g_!_la_ti_,)_rr_o_f _W_i_tll-~-s,-b-y-,1
----- ---- ----
MOTl ON tu C:fm1pel Plctii11((f.; Amwer;t /ti O,•posftlon /~ 1mmw:um by ·oe!'e,mfat1t - -
Mli:hacl Wiukdn1a11n (A tt;1<')l!J1cet1Ls; # 1 Exh ibit A Com[}laint. #;? Ex hi hit B
1() I 7!.20 I 'J ill Sh0µe~depe>s111on. fl.;i Cxltl Git C-5· 1;I 201 4 11ffiu~ 1)ote . #c!;! l':J(hit,il D
Jnvolee Shopc,.lep,,~lt11111. # " ExhJ bit F \ ldeo~ou1 Ii- hivokc ,11 \Vllliruns. Huhe1tl
j ( F.rner,•d; IO, I T;O I ':11
---+---"-
6 INOTICE of l fearing re Hi I MOTi.ON to f:nrnpcl Pluiirrijf.; tlll.lwcr.s t<> IJ.er1a.,'iti0/r
I L ' l?/'.!OI~ J.!l;! f:rn111/1u1li(.Jr, liy Mirha~J \Vinkillm:um (Willmrns. Huber,) (Entered: 10/17/20 19)
- -- -- -- 1
il(ics/20 19 _163 lll~PQNSF19 Muti un r~ l-4S Atnerrded MO'.HON to Strike 150 D~,;.i.gn~uon of Wi tness
llnJh ,..... ~hltl-'lh.6,rC'QU u;;,:1:.m~~·n ,qi.tnnibk1W111..:p1'1U!!t.,..'/~ I i,u:,r~~&-1-L:ni O I 11 In
,, 1 :lrPfl t~tnUctil nn:111• r't•tm Rli~\11.:H)!!~i.~·, K.tjhlH
'--
l:iy /<. Hchat.l \Viokelnmnn. 1Wi ll i,m1s-, I lubcrtJ (Entered: IOL2!l/20 I 0)

J Jb-4
JO[NDER t,, l OJ. ~c.~pn11:;c to Motion rn l'/oi11t(ffs S1dk,, Def-ewl(l11t 1
:; £ ,pen hy N,;:\y
$ou!l1 Neuw~pi ne Clinic. cS1mrh, Rot) (Entered; IOL2912.Ul9)
-----
/ IOr?')t2()i:9 ] Ii;,; fi'OTICE OT- SERV ICF r,fRespon~es io R·equest tar .Productlorr hj• i\1Jd1ne.l
Wi 11kehn1.tun. I Wi Iii urns , Huben:l (Emered: 10/2912019 )
- - -- - -- -Ln --
ORDER d~riy iffg Mutloh m srrikti .Slun ln~rnm u-s [Vlooc. !'>ll Motion
- - ---1
I JOi3 i,'WIV . I 6(!
K,.1 111 McD~nl el ou IU/3 11 Wl9.(Lew ls-. k l11incl tEnte.rert: 1l/Ol/20 19)
Stri ke. S'igned by
·
ORDER Grnn ting M(it1on to Qu~~li $ubpl>fala nuces Toc·un1. Si{!lied bv Kem MeDanlel
- - - -- -- -- -
I li'D4/2fl 19 1§1
uii 11/00?() ! 9 . tM;\) rEitteretl; 1l/05/2019) ·
-- - 1- - -- --
M QRD CR Gr.anrfng M11tio1r to C-iimpel 'restimony. Stgn.e:d by l<em McDaniel 011
-
11tM . .2019
J 111()4120 19. ~MA) 1Emered:- tll05i'2019)
I I /~)~!2019 rr,•J NQTrCtc I<> T,itk~ o ~·posirl ou of Daniel ~hope by /'. l1chao2l Winkelma)lJi. ( Will iums,
LI ubem I Eu te,:ed: Jl /05/!0J \I) .
BILL ©F C'O!:iTS' b) Mlchnel \Villkeli:aaa11. IAl,ad:m1~ 1ts: =I/ 1 G hibir A -.S111.!J;; 's'
- - -- -- - ---l
11 ,(/l'i.'lO I!.I I
f I ?u _ <1cposil1.0n I11vo1ce. IF] Ex.hJbll n·~ VideosClutb - f nvti(ce ,) (Will ia111t. I I116i:.r11 (Elitcj'ed:
l _ ll/OtV10J C)l .
I11 l.5!l. () 19 jill I N':)TICE Of SERV [Cb of Rcspnnses to Rggue$t !'orPn~tlutlion bj MitJta~I
~
I I 18/201; - I m_
W1nk.clrn11nn. (W11l,~ni~. llub~rtl t f.rllcred• 111L'i'P-U!\I)
NOTICE OF S.1:'.k VJCE llf Re.J;p'111SC'S lO Req!lesr ro_r_P _r_o_d_
\\"ltik,elrruinn . 1Wilhams-. I l1rb, 1t1 (811:e~_d; I l/1 Sf2019)
uc_ti_o'-n by M icha~,

111 19/2019 .ill Request to Issue SU]3i'0l.'..."1A J'odlrnducrie111/!Ji,q:iectio11 _by M iduu~I Wi nke.l111am1.
I\VilliJJ rn~, l I111N 11 l (En l_e red· 11/ l 91.lO l 9)
- - -- - -- - -- -- - - - - -l
11 12w20 19 17.1 C1v11-SU13 POENA Lh1cesTicum ISSUED ru to M~ri~rvia· i\ii,1;1)11 C)addi~. M.LJ., J', l~d1
Heull h Nerrro~urgery Ce1itrnl I ov Pro,.-lilcdo:n/luspe~ti1.m. (KJ ) tuHcr-ed; I I12-0/20 I~)
MOTION to Strike J.Q ,\ftitlu.li1 fn Suppon ofMoLivn.by Qe'f,, 11dm tl Mi,;hn~I
Wiukelmalin I Arn1<1hme11ts· fl- l ExhJbit E~.. ,.!.,~Coniprehcnsive pre~ciiprion st11nrumy by
br, WilTkchnunn ,·# J f.x lribar Ex ,"B.:_.Lelte.r ufTcrmlmnion nf PnnenrP~1y~clw1
Lli 121'.! 0 Iti I T:'i Rel111ionslu. It .J. Exhihrr F~ C_ Pla1mlfi'~ ph;irr.111ccl,lill'.a] r~t,r(ls frQm Krog"'r-#,:132. # ~
.E.., hil)lt E~. D_Exr~rpl fr,1111 Dr. Wlnkel.111111111.~ iJ~positkin tcitimOll)'. fF.l E.w l bfi Ex.
E_.NJ1dc\\·tt 1,Jf Phill1, IJl t.'l\lllt, i\ JJ), /tl.J. 1-ixhibll E.\·, F_ .Affidnvit winkel maru1_111tlon to
I1<11ik:e_siµ1;,:d,1 (\Vill rnms. Hub~nl 11:irnered: IJ/l.1120)9 )
-- - - - - -- -- - - ----i
ME~\'IORANDLl'M 111 Suppon re J \'S- ~OT!QN to !:itclke 30 Affith, vit 1n SllP.J)Ort c,f
l2/12 2019· 176 or
l'-•lc tlon,MOTTON to Slrikel\) Ai'ficln vlt in Support Mot ivn,MOT ION 10 S!ri~e.Jll
Aifld11vit i11Supr,n1T1:1f Mul io:i, tJy ~licliael \Viuk~irnnnn : IWilliariis,; Rubetc_) (Entered:
l 2/ L2120 19)

I MOTi <.)N for Summ,1ry }u~g111~ut bi f:)e:feli UMJll ivil!-)li11el Wi nkeliriami (A-t1acl-1111c,nt",:-# l
Exhl hit A _ Wulkd111w111 :rffiJ avi1, -fl ~.Jb.biblt A " I Wiukel_marm 0 1. # .i l~,xl1iblr A -2_
Me.<lkutiom p.rl\:icnbed to D aniel $hope.-/,/ d: f-..xhiblt A-J_D r. WinklemllJUl Octoht!f" 2i
Ii 2. E"hi bit A 6_0V Fehnldf"Y 12 2014, II B Exl1itii t ,\ 7_0V Mny 1) 20 le.I, 11
1998 tener. /J. S Exhibit 1\ - t~P.11n n1M1~ement p,,licy, # !J_ E,xhibrt As5_tlOS 111. z.3;._Jjr-#.
,UE xl11b1LA
I
12 Jq]OIQ I· r
: $_LIDS. Mu) 131014. II l1J Exl11bi1 A 9_Lener IA.Shope 1\_lay 161014,-# L! F xhibi r
fl_l:..xcc.rp.r~ l'rom Wi11 nkclimrn11 (]ep~i. if U Exhibi:J C~ F.\~efRI\ frl-im Shope-,,;fepn, 1t. .U
E.'< hibi t p - Krc,g~r Plu1rmat;y,# .!A l.::xhibit E_io 1s.03 I;:\ Coq1µ!11lnt,# 15 Ex.hi bit

L J P~OJ~ 08A'l8 nn l~rof dismiss.al 01·v;·inkelma1m .l (Wil liams. Ro-b~n) (Eme:rech

121 12 /20 19>
,____,__
JZ!lb
 l "'imllclh < U\'1tll C"uur! l)mn~t-.~tcl.N R<'1,11.:d
Jyl.Ei\ fOS,\ND IJM ln Suppon 1'e I7"' t,, IOTION foi• Surnrnru,-y )(tdgmenL lJy Mic.l:llli;I
1

I Wink~ l=11. / Wrlflnms. Hube.rt) (E11~reL1. f21l.2{20 l9)

-- - - - --
1\ffSCELL-\'NEf) US FJOGUMHNT: ltem1.;,JJtion of Undi~pttted Fact,; re ill MOTI ON
- --- ---
121 l2./J01') J79 for Sum111Rry Jutlgmenr by Michael \\link~lirw nn. (Wi lli:ims. Hnb_e11) (Elll.tfrcd:
1°2112/20 ll)) ..

JOu\/OER tlJ 17$ MOTION LO Strike :ill Arfidavit in $upµ<irl of M01i,1n.MOTI ON ro

12' 13120 I <J .LJlli Stri k-e JO Al'fid:1 vi1 111 S11p1~Qri of t-foti,;,n ,lVl(>Tl0N to Stn ~e ~ Allidavit in Suppol'! of
iVh'll iWi, b) i\T~w S9u1h l\~t,ro~pineCllnlc. 1Smirh. Roy) (Entered: 121urz_o r9)
M(.·r rlON f11rSr111lm;11} J\1df'TT1e~t bi). D~fe"11drrnt New·Soutb Ncurospitie Cll1'. i':
J lt\ !1111:hmems: lhl 6.Xhibh A t\ffidav,t or M1t.:hae_l Wlnk1;1Jmi;J,n l\!l.l) , 11-2. 6xb1lm A-J
1
tv1ic hael Wi nkcl m,mn C\ .li .1 Exlti_bil Acl J\lle.Uitiarfon pre.sc'ribe.il to L)Miet Shope~11-1
1-.xJ.ttliiL ,"i !L!l•~r fr,;iu1 \~i1ikel111w:n IU.'l:?.- l99_S,. ft S Ex.hlbil A;:4 P;iin Mrrnag~1!1:nt, tt'Q
r 12/ 1312019 ill
I ExhibH A-:J Unn~ Drug !kreen. fl~ ~xl11b1r As6 Office Nvte.,ft-t Exhl ti_1t 1-\-7 Otfic_e
N()1e,i/ 2 6 xhib1i :'\-!l llrlne Drag Scr~efl, #-l,Q Bhil).ir"A-9 Letter from ·\VU1k-dniam,,:#
r,,.
Wi-11kelm,rn·n ,:,;> il J::xhibrr t Ex.ee1·tps
L_ l.L l::xhfbit _l:l ~x..:~rp1, from pep()si1lu{1..1il
frnm dep,1~iti/:111 r11 DIHlllli Sh,,p~.11 I 3 l:i.xhibil D- Pharma<:y .Records, ft-I -! E~ilib_it f;
Complltln1·, it ll E~hl bll F Oi:ckr of Dlsmls.~al.) (Smith, Roy) ( l:imc.r~tl: IV 1"3l2(l I 91
11/ LV201fJ _182. MENIORANDU/vl !11 Slrp'jmn re ill .'vlOTlQN for Su111mury J udf,•menr hY. New ,South
N~uro$pini:: Cl irii~. (S·m,th. Roy\ rF.mcred: 12/1.3/20 19) ·

?vU_S,CEI .LAJ\1EOL1S QOClJ/vl.ENT; NcWSourh Net1.FUsp111e'~· ltemlzati1ir1 vfUucli ~'p11tefl

r ~z, U ,'.2{H t) ill F,1cts r~ ill /1.'IOT ION forS1 1mmary Judgp1ent by New $0\1tb N~1rresµ ii1c- ClilliG
(Smid, , Roy) tEmerG<l 12'1312j)19)

N<)TICE nJ Hearing reJ:::' t-lOTION f,1r !>111111llilry J111:lgm~t. 175 MO·ni:;,N t,1 Stnk;;
_ 1~ 17'20 19 I .1lJ .~fllduvlt 111 Supp,,r( uf l\l[f,Jlin~ ;r--·101'.0~ m Stiikc_ Ml At'nnavit i~ S-upporr of
M,Hh11i ,IVIOTION m Srrl"e 3U -~ ftid,_tvlt In Support ot Modo~. by M1chfflll Wlnkelrf\lln n
II Wi·l! i&lll.s. I lll!>ert) (1~11tered: 12/ 1712019)

C
--t,= - - ~ -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - -- -
RES.PON.SE in Qµpt1sitf<111 f~ I 77 MOTl'C>N tor Summary Judgment byl)_liJ1icl Shope..
1
(AttMlu nc~: It l AfiiJavn Afficlttv.lt R-c-1rn Be11I, fl 2. F.xllibi1 lJrin'eTe\t. #.,1 S.xlil brt
mschw:i,?.e lener.#-;lE!dnbii Ne1YS011th policy, fl~ E.'-hibi.L11or~ from offfc~Wink0008:.#c
11/1812019 IX.5 Q Ex hibit,DE'zA uxhJbiia, # 1..'\ftidriVll.D.11ii~l's~.\ffid:wit, # ~ E<lrlbl1 wrne ei'nf u.\t1ion
letters. ti fi!. F.x.hJbiL S¢vcrrd pharmacy records,-# .ill Ex hibit D.iftere1ll pha1mac.y re:cor,ls,
# .U Exh'tbit Lener fm111 WinkelmAnt1. # ll Exhibit MBi\it<:: rep,m.J( Robinson. Abbyl
<Emered: J'.:!1rn~o 11>i

12/( 81201•) MEivtO.RANDLM in Opposit,011 re 177 M~..)Tl(')N for Summar) ludg111e11L by !Jamel
Shope ( Robirr!lfm, Al:lby i I Emerc~ l 2118'201!>)
--
R.ESRONSE in Opposh1<m re Jn lv!OT! ON ICl ,~Iii!..~ .J.QAffi(l11Vjt in·S.llppor.t uf
Motion.MOTION t1, Srrik~ J.{l ,-\JfitlitVil Jn Stlppar.t ol Molion.MOT!ON IL> Strike;!!.)
J2,•I $120 I <J AfAdavit in Support ~if 1-.h>rion. bi Daniel Shope (Attachments; 1f l Af-fi,daviI Afndi!Vi t
Rei1a -Beaf. U. l :B:xh,blr Urli,e ret:cmJ, # :! E_xhlbi1T\:fn1i11ation letter, ti±f,x biblt
,____ ____ New.$1)1tth Policy. it~ B~hit1il Winkel recrn,I 0008.:U fi Exlu bicDE.'\ a pJ)IOVlll.)
(RQlli11Mm.1\ht,yJ (E_lllc:rcd: J2/ I8!2019)
- - -- - - -- - - -- -- -- - - --1
-RES"101''5 E ln Opp<1sirlu11 re· 18 1 MQT19N r1jr Surnrnriry J.ud-gmem by l)P.mcl Shnpe.,
l/\1t,whm1ml,, 111 Affid~\it Affidavit c1f Da nid.# 2 Exhlbit:~mi'le eva[lmtiun do~~.#}_
Exhlblt Ph111mucv rc<',i1ds, I/~ Exhibit l)iffei.·1u Ph.u·nrnc) rrco1·d~. IF---;i Exijihi1
1fil! Dci:e,nd111u~ Lener uf :td,ni,sinn.'# 6 l=.xhihil MBMC rc,{'rd. tt 1 At'.tl.dovh Arful~-v1L of
Rc,w 1-lrnl. # ..6 5xhll_nr Lriut c.~mblt;=f/ 'J. Exhi.hir.Tcnnrnario11 Iener. t/ 1.Q F:xbibit
Ne1v~outh P~li~)'"..,; il E\hibiLv\li11kelmM111 1.l008 l~ner, /I il 1::xlLiliitD.El\ ,\ pproval
Ishect.s.j (Roh1n,01r. Af;hy1 (I:11t~d: U/ IR/20 l9.)
I - -- - - - -- - - - -- - -- ,
 Wl<Wltt 'l\\,nO\<.di C:1ri:oll ('mri1 1Ju111t1.7DUl1ft Rr-rqn

Iu j 8/201~ RESPONSE [u Oppo~1tio11 re I75 iViOTI ON to.5 trlke .1!1 Afliruivi.J ln Supp,rrr qf
M,,tion.MOT!ON t,·, Strike l.Q Arflclitv]:I (n ~ugP.:a>rt of~·ltJlitin.M0T ION l\1 Strikt..;ill
; Affid11vit Jtt Suppn11 i1f \.101ii'm, .loi11,lr:r /11 M1irfr1n ro<±i'Jrik.e dnr, 181 re.: 715 hy l) ai1 lcJ
Sh11pe,- ~-~ ttnchm~n!.s; #-1 Afndrrvi1. Aifida"~ Re11u.13~al, 1f ~pxhi_h11 Urine rccof(L # ;1
Exh1lm le1m,11a1mn letter,c/i ± Exh,blt NrwS<•.l1tb f\1hg,, Ilda Exh1ml W1tll:..:J rtctlrd
r 000$, IF !i "l~:d1ib_l t OF.A »pprqval.J \Rol7i11s911, Al\by) l etlt¢r<!cl: 12118120 19.l
NO"f!CE or liearing re· JsJ MQTION frir ~ulllJnary Judgment b)' New South
-------~
12 I 9/20 I 9
NeurusP.iH.i Cl inlc 1$mllh, R.,,y) (Em~retl: 12/ I W2(H9)
REBlITT AL in re . I 77 MQT!ON fur :.mnmru·y J~t.!gn1.:11 r by 1'v llc;.h,1eJ Whi!<~ lmmm,
l ::L:!1/2019 (/~1 ri1cl1mcnl£ 11 J,, f{xblbi1 G_B:1p1ist MccH~-al f:en1er;fr :1 Exlii bi1 11_suop1c clefJosi110n
exccl'JJJ~;../1 J. E"<hibil I_Compr<:>hc.1\si~e Puin Cenrer tli·sch_orgc .) ( WillJJtms, Hulien)
rtlntcJed; 12127/20!9)
- ----+---l- - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1
,. ____ MOTION tt, Stri ke.A}f1dw·ir of Danie/ Shop-.:, MOTION Jhl' Order ro S lmw C'.J.tu.~~ by
Ocfe11J m1t Michael \Vinkelm1lm1 (\Vil llarns, liuberr) fBntered: l '.!f.27120191
I MOT lON In.S trike Stth£t!I./Ui!HI .4:(fida 11/1, of Nenalka/. 1\P..RN, fiiYF'-lJt;J-LNC h)
12/27/20 I •) IiJ3 Del imdnn1 M1cl1ael Wi111<eli1llllliJ . (AU1µ; hn-1ent~: # .L F,:xhibit U~ A_:W 19-07-'.23
~.CHEDUU NG ORDER Pt!ed, ti .1fuhi tm E;,; B_liig:tiHghrecl .nfffdit.vil.) (Wil l1.ims.
I Hitl,!e.rtJ tEnlL'!'~tl: 11127/J.0 19) · ···
- ) t< EBUTTAJ,.111 re 17'i i\·LOTION wS1 rikc .lli,Affid:tvil in:Support of M ol1on.MO_T_·10-· .-N-i
I 94 I to .Strik,• 3f!a-\ffi<l,1v1l 111 Support of Mmlcrn,MO'f JON to Strike 10 Affidavit In SUP.P{>Ji
_____
of Motl<m, b,._ 1\l idmel Wi11kel-· m11nn. (Williams, Hubert) 1Enter~~
. 12/i7120l9. ) · •-

NO- I IC F 6f !:!earing re I rJ2 MO'I ION to,Stril..-e Aj)1Jc1vit o.( {)a11iel SfuweJ.VIQTIUN f{!r
() I 10'.!/2020 J tJS Order 10 Slmw CnUM:, !2.1 "-'IOTION W ~trike $utm!q11tmt AJ/idiii,itr of Ji111tl.,Rr,w
1IPR,V, r'Nr-IJC·{,NC by i\fo:,hael Winkelnuum l WIi iiams, Fi nl1ert) (Entered:
0 J/fl4'4();!Q)

[ R-ESPONSE in Opj)1,slllvn re J 9.?.l\·IOTtON te Strike Ajjl(/avfr of IJ1111ht l

0110?,'.2020

- -- --t--
() 1102/2(/21)
IShapt:iVl.(YrJON l\'Ji nt1ler rw Show Cause ey Danie.I Shope. /lfobh1.s011_. A b"l>yl (1':nterfd:
() 1/()2/1020,
-- -
RESP<.>NS E 111 ()pjislsltln11 re ill NIGTtCJN to Smke Substrquent 1\flidiJ.,·it.1 11/Rettr1
!1el1/,APH.N. f'NP-lJC /,NC by Daniel Shope. /Attac.hmc_nt.~: II L~x.h1bl t D01:ke1Sheet.)
0

fRohin~vn, i\bhyl (Entered Oli02!2020)

tJ I i (.)<)1202rJ ill!. ,REB tl'J _l'AL 111 Suppot1 u/ J\f:1//()llh' Si!'lk,• :'·1'./1Str//tt"e1ti rVJiih11·i:.1· ,~fr.'e.11c1_Bwl, A l'NN,
l
. FNl'-B( I.NC by ,\Hclu1d \v111kelmanu. 1W1lhams-. Htfbert) (E111ered; 01 /139/2()2())
- - + ,-R-1'.BtrrTAL in Sttpparr '·'/ M<iT/on to S11•lke ;V,fulilviT 11,( {)w fie! Sltt,pt' l,i_y Michael
0 I IU<Ji 2020 I®
1 Wl11kelnHmn, C\Vllllarn_s. llulierr) 1E11t\!r~: 01 10<.J/20'.!0} _ _ __

01 · li ':Z0.20 .100 ~IOTJON" m Ccrntinue 7,·ial S11rt111i( by Defendari1 Mic;h11el Wi11kd1m1111i (AHadtments: it
Il exhibit 1\-1':ri111lts ,11 \q111~nis. Hu ben/ 1Entere1!'. (J ll l71'.!fil(l1

n1,20Ji.02q !fll RESPDNSI~ 111 bppo&1T] l)Jl n: :!OO \~(.)T ION lo{.'.011tit1_u_e 'l'riaf Sr'1tit1g by l)lllllcl Sllupe, I
(Ri,lii11,on, .1\bhyi 11:ntcrl!rl: 01 /20/2020) ·
- -- - -
IJ II i.412020 .'.02 IU:JtlITTAL in 1e. :mu "-IOTl(JN to Crnuhme Triul S~1i11gJ:1y Miclu,el Wink¢:l1i1a1ui.
- -- In\ri II lams. HuJ,ert I 11::lltl.\r~tl: 11 1/'24/202/) t
I0.,~, -'-UJflO'>o ., 03
~
NOTt t.c ot Ht.mrmg 1·c l!.10 tvlOTIOi\/ !o.Cru1Lim1e 1,·ial Setting b) Mlchacl Wi11k~lni a11n

1Th28i2020
I
l
7'04
( WiUlams. I lt1i}e1t) (Enrere•I: !J2/03J202('))
J ORbl::R~ Sl;weJ
- -
-.•-lJ.-0-. ,- KJ) (Enier~cl: 031021:W20)
by Lt·~l ic D, Klng mt 2/'b

1-1-1~
 l\\1·n11r-!h Ufl.-inl t \ 11m Ui-,rrjrt t)ockrt Rq~nt
f n,~/1712()2() ~ ORDb.R Or CONrru\il;IANCE. Sig1rt'd by Kent Mdlaniel on 03/ I7/:!020. (aj ) (Enle1'!d :
OJ/17/ 2020)
-
I Join t NOT ICE ,if Heini ng re 171 M(.)'.JION for,Surrmmry Jwlgment, 17~ !vl(}TION 10
Strik~ J(J Atficlavir 111 Sirpi1or1 <)f'J\llnrlf,11,1'vlOTfON to Strike·'.{ O Affidavit io Suppr.,rt of
Mmtnrt,MOT !ON L,, Strike .:m 1\ffictavlt i11 S1.1ppo1t nf Mt~ti~111., I g~ i\,10 TrON 10 Strrkc
0N0911020 106 .4ffitla1'1/ 1JJ D(tni'vl '-'hop11MOTION fur Ordeno Show t nuse, JS1 Ai!OTION f'tir
S1U11 rm1ry fodgmen 1. ill MOTION ro Strike S11b.11!q11e1.11 A.ffidaeir., (if Rt:na Huc:1, ;V 'RA',
FNP=llC--L Vr' t,y N~w :;,11,th Nem1),'j:>rlie C'linic, Mi-:hacl W~ ~lll.ih111 (WiJfou11S ,
I-I 11herr\ l.Fnfcrrn· (l6/091202.0)
- --------
First M(JTION t'iw "i u11l111 i!r~ J uti.gm.:111 liy Plaintiff Dmiiel Shcipll (Atta¢hm~nr.,;: -# 1
F..~lii l1ir Cop} ~1f thl.s Court's Otllc:r, ti;}, Exli'ibit l:fosp1 t,il r~<1orcl~.-!! J t.xhihh P root o.f
pntiem',NIrr~• 1·eco1d s, 'II:! E.~hlb11 N~wSou th Ncurospines fJulky. # .!i. Exhihi t vmfou<
pJtunn.,t~y store rei:ord,, c# !J l~xhihit !>r(1k~'11 up from F 10 F JO l.)\'l'r 500 p,1p,1;~ ul' mi;,di ~al
O(i / I 012fi2/'> '207 rec,11'.(is, #. 1 liithib!t ,111110, II!!. t.~h ibit ~ame,./1 2 Exhihi1same._,iu-n Exhlo1t ~ame, Irll
13xhibit s:ame. # 12 'E~ttihlt same .# l...\ E:,xhlblt smn~.# J 4 Exhibit same,# li Exhi oil
~ame ,'# l!.i 1::xl11bi1-r.:1 mittut ion letter f'ror11D efe11d;rnts, itJ1. Ex hl lfa lii~clicnl t·ecords.; It
18. Exhibit p·ol!c·,1,, II i'q A(l1Ja1,,L ·R~J1a Beal N P,. # 2Q i\ffidav1tDllniel .Shc•j}e,) -
(RoblHS1)11, Abby , t.l:.mered; Ob.I JU/2tl20)
ME..YlfJRAN QUM i11 Support 1-c .1Q1 f ir11t MOTlf)N Jor Sunimal') Jucfgmem by Panlel
or,11ort!.)20 .!OlkShope, (Robinson, .Abby) {'Emercd: 06!10!2020)
~
- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - 1
tlf;>/ l 0,1!120 ~Gtl NQTIGE <If llearTn g re ,?(JTPirst M OTION l'or S.umniary J ud.g inint bY D11J1iel Shope
~ _J !RobuJso,1. Abby! , EnteFed; OG! I0/2020,
1
- - -- - - -- - - - - - -- - -- -!
I06 11sr:w:w 1liJ
MOTTON ro SmJ<c ' :!ti? Fh'3l /vl()TI{)N for S1mimm'y Judgment by DHend:mt Mich,iel
Whlkel mann (AHnchmenrs: If l Exhibil i\ - 20 I\J-07-2-3 SCREDULINU ORL>BR -
Hied .J tWi lliu111~. H11h~n I l Entered 06i I8/2Q20)

Il'J<> l 9/:l02U - rel\'

.!I I JOINDER 10 _.lil.l MOTr<?N 10 S~·ike ~o'.' Hrst J\ll OTION for St1mrnury Judgrueut b)'
S,~111h Ncum:,pH1~ ( ll nle. (Smtih. Ro._11) (Entel'eij ; 061l9_
i 2_D_l_'1_
) _ _ _ _ _ __

1
0<>119,20:20 ., 1 ,
=- I Winkclmunn. ( Wiili11111~. 1-fuh~n) o-:1nertd: 06!!9/20.10') __________
l~ES.PONSE tq 'vtoti011 re 207 Flrsl lv!OT ION for _Sumnllll'Y Jt1cl~ 1c;m by Micl lfull
__,;

RE:P.Ll' to ReSponsc to ~ lodcm ~e 21 ".' lk spouse Lu Mt>tion IN REG11RDS 'f '()

00' 19/2020 D~FF.:N/)A1V"/:~ RESPON~t.:: l>OC 2 /0 Al'i.D ? // 1:iy Daniel Shope. (Attar.h mcrits: # .L
F,xl1iplt D0C;KE1' SI l.0::.1, II ~ Exhiliil 1>a~nc11111ts .,:id1ibi1 A ,) ( RohJnson . 1\ buvl
! Eiitcrc,f: ()(,: J <cJ/20.W, •

~E)"LY h1 Res:iwns.c 1,1M11Ll1111 re. fil l~e~ponsr lo M mion try l::i'a11icl Shop.!.
lli 1A1111d1mt m,· Itl Exhitii1 l)e.fenda11L<;, h1l11{LJ lRobinson. /\ bby1 cEmu1:J: 061l !.1/2020)

OGIJ <112.o;m RF.SPQNS L-111Opp-,>,-llinn re 207 1"1 1:s\ MOTION fyt St1111ma ry Judg.mc:nt by New SruillJ
215 Ne.umsplne Cll ttl<' , 1Smi1 h. Roy) / Enk rcd: 0.6/1 9f2!i20)
,'vl()TJ!JN rur S,1111ctk'ns 1,ndt!r Rule// all(/ 1/u: l ,ili;r;n!ion 1\r.',·m~11tabilirv Ac, by
De.fend:1111 nlichnel \\'inkelrncrnn ( Armcl1111c1nt. # l Ex hi.bit /\ - 20 I~ l'-23 Lelteftl'I
l i7106 202.tl 216 1\ 1112rni;} A hh)' R1Jbinso11, ti ;! EAhi l:ii I B 1019-10-29 Ht':;lti ng Trr-,n~cript_mlll k\
~()111pd_M tn, #'J ilxliibit C' 1019 07 23 S~HED UI.INC QRDBI~ - Filed.}{Willi,uns,.
Th,bim, !liuic1'eJ- 07 (J6 !0201
07/()6!2020 I11 , f\•tElvlOl<AND.UM OPINION :tml Qn.Je.r. SifJie.d by Kent McDru:1lel on 07/061:ifriO,
(B C) (Entered; 07/0612020\
J
01\. 20~0 2'18
- - -- -
n:ID.DMENT, Sl/s111!d Li~ K<!.nl Mc.Da11iel 011 tl7/061.2020. (DCJ /En1ered: 07i0612020)
--- - ]
06-11_0_2_0_-'-Ic--)-lll- l RESPON~E il1 C~>pl.lSit i,;n r< lli fl,JQTlON for Sa11ctlor•~under 1?11/e !.J anti rht'
 T\t.c-uti\•lh C:m:uit C:u.u.tl Di~lric1-Dod:<C1 ~OJ!On
.JJrigalln11 .4rcm,1,tahl/in Ar,r .fiy Daniel S hope. v \ tt-acllm(1ul~, Ii l Exl:Tibit Att,,a1ey
ecrrmll. ,Ji t b:lnbll A,tnme:y enrnl t 111 response, fl ;.i_ Exhibit Court'.s emuit tn uttorney We~
Wjlliams, 11 ± Exlli-blt Atror11cy'~ email . II 2 E.xl1ibil Couri'~ emarl to 11ttoniey Wes.# ii
ExJ:tibh Allomt<y's rn1ail tu c11wt.) (Robills<111, Abby) t E;flL~red: 07/0612020)
- -- - - - 1

I01,081402() !'l~lniiH's NotiL'.~ or A'ppeul 1u 1hc Circ111t Col)rt u'f Rllll],:ln County lvl1-~~1ssippi liy Dnn1:J
.Sh11frc, ( KJ) /Enn:ted! 071U8r.\0201

J n,m8,:!Q2(l
1 l)E~ IONATION vf R.e~urd unAppc:."J by JJa'niel Sfm/.itt /Rob,11~011, .-\ bl·iy) fF,nter~d:
07 /08/ ,?020)
iVLOTIQN u, ,\lier J11dgri1e11i nr A1111:11rl-0y Defendanr Michael WfokclJmmn l'\Vlll iru:m,
- - - -
(i7/0Rl20:!tJ
H.uliml \Enlcn:d: tl7/0812.o:m)
- - -+---!-- - ---
RESPON5E_i 11 0 1)pMili,1n l'1! -.:,2 MOTION t,1 Al ler h1cfgm~n1,ir Alli~11d t,y l)u,iii-1
Oi 0912020
1
Shope. 1Rolfa1~011, 1\bl)yJ ( Entered; (')7109lliJ1f))
- ----+-------- ------------------,
REJH ITT.' \ I 'in re ll!;i'MOT!ON for Sanctions 1111der Rill'( If tllidthe /.iri'ga1lm1 . .
07, I 3J,202Q
Acco;,mal>ility ,1c:1 by ivlidiaet \v1JJ.k.dmann. (Wi Ilimns. Hubert I I Entered: 071l3r;!020l
REBlITTAL In re 1'-"' i\•10'1 ION tl'I Alter Judgmcm ()r A11wmf b~ ~,fo;i1ad Whi~<1lina1111,
07 1 16120~0
(Wifliams. Huben) ! Emcre<I: l17i l612020J
--------
()71111:!020 216 Clerk's E,th11n1c:' ol Co,J of Appcal(KJ) (Entered; 0711Tf W20J
- - --! - - - - -- - - --- - - - - - -- - -- - - -- ,

22~ DESKlNATlC)N t"f Rctur(j <111 Appe.iil P} Daniel $h9pr, (Robii1,n11, .Abby) IErilered:
/ ffi'' 20/2Q.20
1----+!0_1_t2_,v2oio1 ~ -
·oT1 cE. ()f' !-forui ng r" ll 6 MOTION fur S.1,nc1ion..~ 11111/er Rµ /it;// anti 1/:t, l.if/;prrio,tt
I()i '2()i 2/J.2(1 Ar:rr,11111,J/Ji/111, , kl,~], MOTION f(I t\ lt«r Judi!ment w · ,\mend bv Mkhael Winke lmann
(Attacllnu,rll•,; Ii l l::xh1b11 ,\~Em ,li t_2'020,·07 t-i.) (Willlum~, fl 11bcrtt ( Ellt<!rc.cl ,
Oi1.2ono101
It)1, 2w10:io 1229 An1e.ncle.J Clcrk:s E<t111111\e of Cost af Appenl (KJ) (£111.:red; Oi/Z7/2JJ20)
- -- ! - --+- - - --
07/2772()20 ~ /(J l(slliAin (' ,11mry' Circ;:t'/1 Cfo,:k by Micbacl \Vinkd mmm . (Wllllam~, l'Lubem
23f) r'F.nterecl.: 0'7127/20201
- - I - -- ~

23 1 CERTIFlCATF (;)f COMP! ,JANCEl,y Af>by Ga le Rob111son on bQhalf of D1m1el Shope

~7(18fZ020 (Robi nson, Abl)yJ (Ente!'ed: 07/28/20201

Q.ll, 1112'020 ,~.,

-, ·-
!'!O'nCE lll"Fleflring h~.2 I6 MO:l l()N fol' S01J1c1ii)nS: ""i/i::r /lule I I and rlw Ll1111w/(m
~\c:c1m11tah/li1y ski .bl' Mkhael ,v1nkelnrnm1 l Willta1m1, HuberrJ (Enl<!r~ 08'/ 11/2020)
-+- -+- -
,~, RE.S PON.S F in Qpjlll:<iti,111 rc "> I/~ MOT.ION for Sanc1cons·u11d<1r /?11/e /I umlt!1,t
UH iJ~1?.0?.() _..]_:)
J,irlt:,micm A1·1·(11111robil11y A,·1. 2.t ,! Notice 0 1· New ing 011 Motion by Daniel '.Shop_~
iRt,bi11s1>11, Abb) ) ( E11rc1 ed. 08111120::?.0) ·
----
r,x,I8•2mo llli
~ -- '
O RDER Setrillf! Damu:ges· Hea.oft1g set for OWO ll2020 nt 2P!'1. Sigrii!d by Ke'nt M,cl:>Orii,<'.I
on O!!i I 8/2020 rMA l 1Entered: 08/ J.81204())
-- - -- -- - - - -- - - - -- -~
RES:PONS ~ io re 2J•1 Order b) Daniel ~IH)pe. I,\1 \,u:h111em,:·1t 1 Exhibil fl l~tl doc1111i~t1l.
#J. Exhibh filed rlocunte11 t. ii J. f.xhiblr ~mall (ti Be.t'k}' :l3C•¥d, II :l Exhilift 11111e111fotl ,ost
08121 /20?0 13!\ of:i:ipµ~lll , /£.f Exhlbll cmuils'from Defontlluit. #.!J. Ex.hTbil emails, from Dcfondam. #-1
F.xhiblt enuul From Dclcnd;rnL. # ll Exhihli emall rrom befend:, nt. It 9.E,hihll email frc;,rn
. rhe Coun.11R11hin~o11, 1\bby,11, F.nt~r~,1 (,)812:l llO?O l ~
- - ----'------
E-Filed Document Nov 19 2020 14:05:40
Cas_e: 61CIL20·CV-00142·JA 2020-M-00995
Document tt. 34-1 Flied•Pages: 2
11/09/2020 Page 1 ot 1

--~

"ECAIBl1
_B
 -..~1.J..n.111
,-...111
,._....,...............,..
5-1.~ . ........ .

- ·

• I • I • •

llll!!f/11

•
 ~~: iw.;q1:1u-ov-Q.?;m ·@q~~f2 &t@df 09/~/2~0 . ~e J.-Of. J.,
E-Filed Document Nov
Qase 19 2020 14:05:45
6;1.Cll:2Q-~-142 2020-M-00995 Filerj 11104/2020
Docum¢nt·27~1 Pages: 1 f?age 1 o'fl ·

ill>J :ra:1.HJ~UNTY c·~ wr ~F~,-..,,':"¥~·

"'·r r·-·~9Y.J'<"f"(. ~S1£!UP.Pl
Amrni:W 2STIMt'fWip•iMlt\le
Sf.Ptqi1!,cr IS, g.1.P-0

·j~J.itLisru:feE
vs.

.
·Abliy, irileJw~
.
; ~~l!&l~l/~~4l~Pim1,Jti.t.c 1,
~ f iji~ I _g·~ ,
Ei!. ~~~~!0:1 I
1.J,1~...~-JV·~i;--~•c : ~ ~,m6t'tht!:-11prif11
~ r m1~.ahov:B?§ty.Jta llhd.n11m1;ttc11

I
ffiii:ie!1*~'olai 2118'2 r,~&·@~illO'tlC'l"~ ~Hi'4·,00·
hlitttt{$'.~ ,~~_g,{}O;*plfgC i1f1Mlfl
Jl~~.~~ .({ 6i00~100 ~Ill! W,00
t.:~ lftt!itc:otdrcuJ( ~re~k iI4c,
1
~ ~J§.~'$..FJS1':IM-A rtm, C:k>ST
.
(J~..§~.
€QJfRl' 'MfOR;l.'V-'l:l S34B"8(1
cm~'it1\~MD!tl' ~~l>TD~l'YL<\Tl'01lllro,,
• ' - ~ I ' o,, .. ~~ ~r
i!}~l~l)~~'NCE"QUE ,I
E-Filed Document Nov 19 2020 14:05:52 2020-M-00995 Pages: 19

CQDE Of J{!DJCIAL CONDUC"T

Adopted by the Mississippi-Supreme Court
-A pril 4,.~00~

T-l!ble <if Rule$

PREAMBL"E

TERMIN OLOGY.

CA.NON l - A J_udge Shall Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary.

CANON 2 - A Judge Shall Avoiil Impropriety-~ the Ap~rance of lmpr~pritity ln

All Adivitie_.s~

CA NON 3· - ,\ Jndge$ball Pe.(f~J.:111 the Dutieli of Judicial Office Impartially and

~lligently.
CA-N ON 4 - A Judge.Shall So C~ndoct the Judge's Extra-Judicial Activities as tii
Minimize the,Risk·of C.onn)c:t wnh Judicial Ob.ligations.
CANON 5 • A J udge or Judicialeandidatt: Shall ~"1°~ FrQm -1Iiapprops+.1tt
·P-olftital Ac_tiviiy .

.APl'LICATTON OF THE.GODE OF JUDlCJAl. COND UCT .

COD.E OF ,JUDICIAL CONDUCT

Adopted by lheMississiJJpi Supr~me Coo
A:pril.4, 2002 EXHIBIT

i_......:.,D~·-
Our lc,gal :;yst6.m i1>·bas.ed <>n the prim;iple that lil1 independ_enJ, f:th: and competent
Judiciary will i_nterpret and ap!)ly .th.e laws that gove.m us . The.·roic ·o f the judjelflry is'
central to-Ameiica~ conc.e pt.~ ~f ju$t(ce an_d th e rule !)flaw . lnl.mlSie to'll ll si:clion.s of° thi-s
C~d.c a.r e the pr~tcpts·thal judges. irrdividuaJly ;md colleciively, niust re$pcct 1111ifh(ni()r
0

ih~ judletal office as,--a pvbfic tnlsJ_.and .strive 16 enha11ce and ma.irtlru.Jl coitfidcnc.e in our
 legaj sy~etn. The Judge is an lJJl>lter of faii:ts''1tfl4)itW fro;.~~e; r.e.so!lllion ef di,SQute!l!and a
~ -· highly visible symbocl of~vel'tlm~ llh\f~11i~'tlif_e.,~tltit. · ~-· ·

Tb# Code of Judicial €t>nd1c1ct is.1nt~U.SJ,~ ~ .~ ~1/tl!.,surn4atds fur elhl(,!1-tonduct

of judges. ft consists of bto~ .statemonts ~1!.~€ &'flui\S:~ ~iffit;-;~ se_l;f9rtfi fo
Sectiom;_ llilder eaeJJ Canoo,,:i ;J/e:~mla0l<,y;-1.S6ti~W..•o 4~l~catl&1t,~c;tio11 :inj:I
Qimmencary, The ~xt t}f'~bC::. Cifu00~ aff~, Ch) S'~~r1WliScdii~(u&l11g,th~"l!ei'IDi.nology and
Application -Sectinns; is au-thorhative. The· G,Q~eNru:,, gy ~~pj:lllllti9 n .i:n.d e.~,1111p le ,
pro·viile~ guij:ljlnce with respect to· the pu:rpose,and me~~ o f ~ -C~o.n-s)lnd ~e1::ti~ns.
Tile 9<,mil}t;nt¥)' i.s n()l i#ended as a state)Jlelltqf~tk,ililoruikmles:. When the text,uses
·~tiajl'' or· "sha-ll m.>\." ita.ifl!Q11ded to J~$'C t>µidl-l)g.ob)Jg~th:ins ~ vloJ~rii:m ofwhkh
can re5cult rn dfsclpt.i:nary ·action. ,When •should,• er 1shoukl !Hilt" .l~¥d, t,l:le text i_s
lnt~llded a..~ nortat<,ry and as .a ~tement af:w~ j~ t>r·f~ t§t:rj,~.Ji~prlate conrluc~ butnot as
3 bi:niliti_; fulti ~~<::_wh~ch·:3:w!1~e;!l:~_ ! b~ ~ :~1Ji~ .B~ ~ ~·:t~c~,,irdeppt~s
pemi~t\?..~ ql~~¢11 or:..il.• ~mcg IJII 1lif,~t¢1. ,J'!:,).e~Jo;~~llt,J s not Cf>ver.ed
by s,pecl:ije l,lmsCr1~ru;; ~~a~~!lli\'.d,;~.ilw.~~~~-r)-~ ;snouftl oe·
,applied a'kiilsi:St~ll l -.villi c'onstllilil')l}2f,requ~~~i~ ~ .,~&_l~ t,'}!~ wid
4t~~nlj,l_ I:aw arid in Qie ·cg'nt\l'.Xl·QfaJli.-rilJ@c·n·~ i j ~ % ~ ~1f:lFtp:l?e-
col\¥rue9 so as J?O!·to ill'!J?)l't~e,~.Jl.~~f~ f.-~- ~- ~ f ~ ~ a l .,
dcoJ'. sfrJf4't..
.
.. • ~ !-•,:. "' ,. . "I
. ' a • • • •

..•
•

2
' ..

...
..

.
•~:i .
..
.~q-
~.,
,~
1"3'.'-

"'
\..I ~ a
. -.l>
,~·~ ~f .
~~.le
;;::<,r
:'t":"
~-
a
.
~·
~~
,. ' '
 '
':}:_-
~!'~
."'!,\;s·
... -;. 1.
. ~ t ..
. '
 •
l

,,,.J
,"".~~--"
,1,
,,

.1'

I.

•
 L

I •

..,, fr!aintain"fR'D t~w P.res,'1~ o/~ll'4fit,4':l,.!,,/J!/1//i/''fJf.~ff!!f.,,'liJ.,'!°'t11ovfrf'.1Jlt1{1(1 itt

~I
w.htch the jr,aJei.iif'Mfimcfi:o.~ Mti{iif#'flf{~c!Jf1lfeif~t/Jif~l'i,~"i!AA'¥e •fJran:e/113S .
Ri!:;pfr.t far the j1Jdicial o/fl.ije ft1rifitate.,y tfrii.ordei'(y.ci:mf/ittt <i/ l~g{timiire Jud.i<Jiol
fu1ie1io)is. Judg_i{s sJ:ould di~rl11,rlli=rh b.e_1Wi!.J!,!l.,f!!'f!,(!fr, ~fh,/Jl,9,f$.[ USi! !I/. '{It pt~Jf{q.e uf
v,!Jice, i~ all of their acti"Wes , ~or:e-x~~"'!,,~nv:,f .!iil. - ,_ . . , -~~~:~ i~ W,, .
ih~ir jlii{gilShlps r~ g.afiz. a persoll!ft:¢.illo.nta,~ij!f~ , . -~ .• ~ , i ~f.w lwiit~~~d •
l)y a po/ice officer for " ffti/%:()/P/tS_~. &,'11i/i?:f$ / f ~ ~ - ~nq1'h~'firiafiJr
co11ductlng_ a judg.e's pe:rso,ral,ba'!l·ft1tf.s,r.. ' ·
.; u

A judge mutt avota liit1iqg ·fPlttPt.~ll.t*J...fJ)~,4~~,qjjfj,~{ifitr-the,<JrJwµ1tfe1R!f111 r:if

ilw·pri.11ate /11 tcresls of'Qtbers....'J?o.r exqmpte; a. f(l.!/Sf~~/'uuJ/i'C judge's judicia l
po$1t/on LO gai,J aJv,~jlf.iig~ ~I iLjmliJ..sU.ll-,:'bJ.v,i.J,11(,,! {~~#Jtff#,/kfiee's fa.m"f/y, .hr
/l()'/jlract11 fvr pub{icai(,m of ~judge-'&. writ~, P..~ #,ftjlif'ti:ta}n ·C'O.rrtrul i,v_er tire
a· • qdvar.tisin,'J ro. avotil. exp.lc:Umiiro iifthe j1,1il,_W:s: o_fli«~-
~.
'
Altlmug:h a ,ludgl! s'h'(lul4 t,e ,v®Siiiv~:J.O ~!!J!,..~/._~,p~ti$tg~ 12/ qf.!tt:p, Q
)IJ4ge nlfly, 1
1a.;,a m~,fie ii!~l.r 'Ji.ttr..t'?lifiiJi'JfiliPliiB?:it.t iFid~j.f.im:.e-o.r proviae.a
~!_f!tr 4.f:r~o1rt111e,flfi(j#:Jm.iFi~v!$~~~~~~tr/i!!~t{.tlt~ !l!:iif~j~io11 <!/
i•!/IJ.m~on to_a_/f.enI'e~.b;:§jJJ48e~-f'.~1Jf-ffl';P $.~~~!§'Llt~~~lf~"m'!_y,TlfpY1_£te
tg -suc;h ptrsrms 111ifqrm.uM;n]w fl1t t:.e,t;()rifm,,:,e:r_M~Jl!:?~it{q.~.

4Jipc,i11~~~g:~1~
1
::t::::~:~::;~:~;
.l; ~~~t.lil~6~,
r;~~~,;r~ , ,;." \. :•,;
1"6_sp_onding to aJJ!c:h,l .irr~lfin(f5 "'~~#,,ilj!l[,/p..
Set! a/,f(J C-arron ~ f~Nartl.u1g ust::<J/1!.'J.•i<llf.i:!~~l!,
- .... ~~
~ , 11~
-~?· • ""
·
,·
,A,jmi~ llWMtlflf 1fi'niq.-vtt/Ull(affl1~·p,,~~jf~ss ~~.Wl to do sr.nnay
ltna Jl/e p.r~.rtfge -t:iftli'f.~Ju~"'ii'J. ~fffeiti'!i ~lfUR('.",t.qJJ!Hr,~i>r-y.ili!l,'J!) ih~)udge testifies .
.Mor,eo~r, w1te11 lliu~~'A,l'ttst1~'9,,us:!' fY/!,i#i.~cl'"i/f!,~".f.?!,~-~~f'W51y;ap,pc_ar~ before the
ju4ge 11UfY be plaeed ln the. awkwarJJ poiilloJ:1.lif.Dl!bw~,dng Jh4 f11dg,e. A judge may,
• ,hjJ..,l(Vl!1'1 ft!fi/y )ifl~il J17'(Jftf{j s_ul/ffi1(ilt{r!._. ,Ff;~&f!.t:Wi.~!-'{fo..'¢flJns'fait.ee/ WiUJt'# iht!
T

. ef.~!14nd~ ofJu.wfoe r~qu.ir~~a j udge .,ht),,ta #/IWf!!"Jtf!".~ f,J~ {"-'!l"'irt11~ _rhe.J1Jdge l()
f#,t.l fY ll:S a ·eharatt1;r wmrep,.
•,

,;,.
;

ltift. ,.
~
'~
\
>

t"..
I
 .
. ,. . ...
.·, .

... .
.
~-:: ,-'·..
'tt
~'

. !;;.•
i-
'
'.fil i•
'
•
:
"'
;~
:<«
~ .
~.,~
t·
i..;
.
~-.
f. . . ~ ~
~'>it,',
~
....'
..,
.. . " =

!
~"<·
.
~
~

iJ'

·'·
.•
 .,,
-
ot/rt{r~· an ap.pe.ar:am:.e,o-fjudicial.bias. A Jud&:e; NH#,ff,',~4/e-rl:;g -~'14l.(fUfvi<fr that 1/iay
0

.b_e,JJ,eri:ejved iu prej/1djeh1I, - ·

'*"

:.. t, ' \ T

}lit.
= ...... '._
-
.
~~.
;'!:.. ~_
E~,-
~~-· ..
I
11·'1
.-
. <',,·.
•
't
 l ~
, '..

.t .. !' ~

J3

.'
 •
(ii).:A.Jbd.ft:..- ~ (!Ct,.
tJtecp_oWClf'O( A ' " .
...,

•
t
E-Filed Document Nov 19 2020 14:05:59 2020-M-00995 Pages: 22

f'ILED
INTHE SUPREM_E COURT OJ<'MISSISSlPPI
Civ1L GA U~E NO. . .d 0- M-·qqs oa SEP OB 2020
OFF1CE·Of".THE ClERK
·suPREME COURT
COURT OF APPEALS .

DANIEL SH-OPE

vs. COUNTYCO,QRT(;AUSE NO. 18-2329

Dr.,Ml(;fIAEL WINl.ffiLMANN,.et.al DEFENDANTS

and hJs personal cap1r~ity;
ana NEW'SOUTlI NE1JR0SPINE
4 - • •

EMERGENCY MOTION OFRECU.SAL

AND .REMA !'i'D TOA PROPER CO:UR.TAND
.. . JURY

C.PMESNOW, Plain tiff Da11i~J Shape. by :and tbr~ugh his atlprngy of recqid and files

thfs EMERGENS:Y ~no~un fqr REC(JS.AL 9fthe honorable}iu:lge·KentMeDaniel.

A~ s.uch_; Pl~fuJiffwill sliowtheMississ.ippi s·uprem!! Cn11d io wil:.

(1) J1:fi,tgc K'e nt1'1cDaniel bas ha.d an active JUDICIAL_c:;OMPLAINT AGAINST

·mM BY l'H:E.A':rro~EY Q.f r~cord ta t&is casl! regardiii~ rhis· case hereto

11ttncliefl w; exhi~it A. However, Jtidge·Kent Mcbanj:el, un trans~ril:!e cecordaticiii by

the reporter; .o£whlcb he refose to,make timely available p11rstmnt t6 M.R.A.R, said

" I do.n'tcar<Hbat Plaintif(lt u.s filed ti judjcj:iry complaint ~g?inst me.'' "!
w11,,i .NOT RECUSE.'' Tt ig,fo the r.econLof whicb P.lalnilif is asking this eo-urno

E~FIIS.11'
MOTION# aoa~~~q44 [ __
1 __
 provide t9 Pl:a/:ntlff, ~speci.ally·since Plaintiff has follovied al.I the prop~r- chains in~

timely and _proper notice of appeal.

(2) Ju.dge Kent McDaniel h'a,$ vi0_Iated C::ANON RULES NPMBER 1, .2, and 31 and

therel,y caus'ing DlSHON.ES.TY.BYA.MISSISSIPPi COUNTY c;Qmtr

JUDGE, and such attiJude by the CFnlIRMAN OF TH.E VERYA6EN'CYTH..t...T

THE ~SISSIPPI ~RE.l\'.IE COURT enacted to enforce judiciaJ compliance

is,simpiy DISHONORABLETO 1JiE OAni; that be to()~ a~ the Chalrm11n of

the very agency that the MississiirPi· Supreme Con rt tstiiblishe.d to STOP,

P.ll0H1BIT; DISMA."'iTLE AND DISPEL 111 conduct of judges_fru· the lnt~grity

of the fair dealing of all Mis_s,issip'(1i court judges. Pleru;e:s.ee exltibit B, the

Missi~sipJ)'i Cotnniission on Judicial.Pe'rforrnAnce Stimdar'ds. This vi~lation by the

honorntile Ju4ge Kent tvfobanicl 's ~ -11 clear and g1~s_eJ1t slap in tl1e fa9e .of any citizen

in the'state of Missis;sippi c.onfidence iil tlr~ integrity of the lvllisissippi Judicial

system iind c_er.Lainly to.the administration.of justice rn the S_tate oflvfi.ssissiP.P.i

J.udk.-ial Performs.nee as preS'c~ibeg by the Mis~iss!P_pl Su_Rreme CourL 's prfiunble or

the Canon CClde o_f'Ju91eia.l Perf~rrilan'ce ~s ac.lopted by the Mississippi Supreme-

QourtApril 4, 2002 .. Please see Plaintiff's ~xhlbit E, not.to ins1Jlt this hqnotaole court
out these are tho Canon Rul~s .and COttUllelUacy ~ 'likely kn.o\Va oy ~ .CO\ltf.
(3) fu<ti~KentMoDani~i, in~entionally nnd d~ber.~foly .ciuiseclirrep.arable harm to

Eliiiritiff and hl ~J,ttorn~y Of record in tliis ease as,,shown by the Order ~ the

honorable Jud~e Kent McD.!ni'el §aid orde;r. fil.ed after ~ iudge r-~fu~ed to recuse

2
 himself even whlle kHowln:g.th~t Plainuff's co'i.rmel bas filed.a COwlPLAINT

AGAXNST HIM regatdin~this same case as far backcasfao.vt1mber 5, .2019. Plea~~

see exllibit A, and Q. :Plaintiffco.ilt!;!nd tJrntjuoge Keiit McP;urieUikely should have

known that r~cu:ial of hirnsel.f in this .e.rts·e was the ~roper duty .efihej 1,1dgefor. th.e

complete fairness ofj_usti~e. ]mt he d1d not recuse himscplf. Instead, Judge Kent

Mcpani~l sat Lb.rough a :S\U!lillc!l"Y jucfgment headng and of course l?Jllnte.d the

Defen4ant's 1no1ion fur summary judgment auetalintion fgr and. against Plaintlff's

attorney {or filing the<;:omplaint a_galnst the l.ioriorirble j uclge.Xent McDaniel Ex. A,.

(4) Even rilore:nit)rbid''to this irre'panilile hatmeaused by tire ho_norabl~judgc Kent

McDaniel is the fact that he a_n dth~ hq,norable juijge Joim H...Em:fiagc-r and Cynthiu

Brewer qf.Madisi.in C.ounty, ( the mentioning of the honora_b le Juc!ge Cyn:th-ii1 BI:cwcr

will be.relevant fu this mattc1= as will -show LI! the forth_ CCiining paragril(.fhs1 :are

stanuif\g memb~r,; qf ~at,s<1me watchdog agcocv that was acfopted arid made as

policy
. by. the Mississippi Supreme Coo.rho -protect the integrity. oftheju4ieial

performance ofjudges in the·state oDvrrs.sjs_sim,i. l'leas.c s<ii:i'Plaintiff'~'exh'ibJt C,

showing the member§ ofth~ C611$,lttee 161 judicjal per:fonn(mce'. .fu short the fox-es

are ~ppe!iriag tt} be gmirditlg the-chiekens, a_s a resolr.the chi<i/{.ens(plaintifls and

-lawyeis hefore saidjudg:!s) doesn't ev_en have o fair chance to defend themselves.

Plafotiffand ~s-courise
~ . l do~s iepi:e$ent tp tliis Supreme Court thati:he hnuot,ible
.. .

jµdge John H ...Emfinger. f:s any any way aparl 0f the honorable ,mdg~ Kent M~Panie)s

wroa:gfuJ eonducit sohemc because exhlbi.t D.i:eveals th~t'jugge Em'fiiige'r h'ssigned.

a
 the appeal of this maUet tQ:the l1onorab!ejudge Dewey Arinur; -li ls ri0t knowi1 to

-Plai11tiffn(ir hls,~ttorrfoy lri th:is:criiecexactly why the hunora!'.lejudgy:Etnflng~r did

nm retain the case for his ewu. dock~1i !\9_netheless, Plain tiff and lii~urtfomey belfc.ves

i harit u bee.a use the hononihfe Judge Emfinger re\llli:es thnt this mo~ercame before

him as a Judicial crimpleint a¥ainst the liol)_orable Judg~ Kent McPaniel abd to

preside·over the: ap!J_eal 9fthe same CQmptjrin~d about'mattei would -be lmprn_per. For

tbi>record, (a time:ly appe.aJ ro Jildge Kent'.J\lfcDanlei's final_order qf;this case was

filed and wiU be shown later in .truS )llOtif,)_n tO the court 8S even tribre5egreglcius

actions by tb_e hon:orabl¢ judge:1<:imtMcDiniel).

(5) 1'1ainti'ffc-ontend that Canon Co-de 1:Jl'Judjcja,! Conduct'as adopted by tlkMississippl

Supreme Co.u11 April 4., 2PDl!, e:¥hi.bil E, more specifically Canon Gode·t holes: A

jtldg~slfall uphoid th~'Inte'grtiy and lrrdependence ol) he ,ludi<;iary. Aj u_dgc shoul!l

patlicipatein establishing, ma.inmining, .and ~fo(cing HIGH STANDARDS-9(

CONDUCT, and shall p~sonaUy obseivc those standares so that the integrity and

iildepepderrce of'th.e-)udicinry will _be preserved, The lft;>mmenlfiry ofth'atmle states.:

Deferences to th_e Juagments and Tuliq:g of1;ourts·depend up.arr PUBLIC

GONFil)ENCF. in: the integrity and in.dependence ofjudges .... lJtrtber...Viol.(!tfon of

ilifs Code-DIMINISHES public confidence in_t he Ju~i.ctacy and thereliy does

IN;IBRY TO I ITE_SYSTEM 9 E GOVERNMENT UND"E'R LAW,

(6) Al110,-- Canon
.
Cod e of Judfoi.a'I Conduct2 holds, A judge
- shall avoid impropriety
.

arid t!ie ~fipiarl!Ilce of Impropriety in All :Aetiviti~: A 3udg~ shaU respe{t ijrrd

4
 ALLACJ AT ALLTIMES IN A MANN]\lRTITAT
c0mpJy with tl1e law ~ .d SR_

r&oMO'[ES PUBLIC CONFIDENCE ,in the integrity and imp_artiality ru

_judieiary, The commentary to thi~.rulestates: Public confiderrce ln the judic1ary1s

coded b.YlRRES.PQN$mLE. OR IMPROPER CONI)IJG'f-BY JOOGES. A

ju~ge must av.oid.ALL impropriety and aweara11£(lS of Ji~propriety. Ajudg~1Jiust

e~pect·to ~e subject of-1;.onst/iQJPlJB-LIC SCRUTll\'Y. A judge must therefore

a~_cept te:sttic1.ions on the judge's CONDUCT that MiGH'.i h_e view~d as

burdeusQme h¥ the:prdinary citizen artd sh9uld do so FREELY-and WILLINGLY.

Canon f\ule 2:Cl,)ffiiiientarf further state.s: The prohibition ag_ainst behaving with
:im_proprie~ .er the appearanee ef impr~J?riet): appli:~!I ·t.o B0J1,f THE

PR.OFESSIONAl AND 1IBRSONAL CONDUCT Of A TI.TDGE.....the

• - • - 4 - • • • •

coitimentary hel'.e-states; The test for -appear_ance·-0.f imjiropricty i~ whether, based (in

the eonduct ofj.J.td~es imp~Wicy might be_qu.esti9.~ed ey ai~asonabl~ person.

knowing all clrcumst:anC!l'S, :S. of Carion .2 i:s jusf asimportant liecause it says i.n~

part. .. .Judges shall not lend th!! prestige of.llu~ir·offic'es to ADVANCE THE

HRIVA'rE INTER'EST'OF THE JUDGES OR OTHERS.; nor shall judges

CONVEY QR PERMIT QTirERS TO cQNYEY tlleimpressiQn that. they ate in il

sp~ial pos1tion to Th'FLUENCE THE J UDGE. th~ commenqu:y to jhls part B

states, Respect Iorthe j udi.cial Offi_c_e facllilales the orderly conduct of k gitimat~

·judicial functions.

5
(7) Moreover, Canpn Code aJ r u.dicial CotrdµCl 3· bolcfS·: A Jtlqge Sba:U P.erfonn the

Duties of Jl.)dicial .OJ.'fi~e Impartia.Uy ana Diligently. The stan_dards to .the ju~g,;$ duty

ipcfutfo: ('a )A Ji1d,ge shall her.and uecide: aJl a'$sfgi1ed ~att\;lra witbiii ·ilie ju~e~s

Jud,~dicticm .EXCEPT lhµS<;f. ln wfiich DI'SQUALIFTCATION xs·REQUIRED. (c)

Aju.dge shaU be'Pi\TjENf, EilGNIFIED,AND cpt11u:e9us TO liriglUlts,jurcirs,

witn~sse~, LAWYERS~ an.cl ()tfler·s wfth whom the,y deaLi.n their official capacities,

acid shall retju:i;re similar conduct ofLAWY'Ei'Ul, and oflh_eir staf:l~; court offr~ials,

:aruJ others suhfoct to tirnjr pirectlon and control. Tho commentar~ for thlk rule
states ifl;par:t. ~e d.uty to htfo.r l\'1Fprocee~Hn·gs PA£RL¥ and with PATIENCE is rw.1

IDCOllSislelll with the duty to DISPOSE PRQMP1LY µf th~ puslp:ess off the courr.

Pm:t (e) of this rule St{ltes: /',_judge s'hatl perform jJ1dicinl duties WI'l'trOUT BiAs

· ORJ.>REJUDIGE. A judge shall NOT, in the l'erf:ormance o{ju_dieial duti!l:S, by

WORDS 01• CoivIJUCT.m,anifes.L BIA,~ or PREJUDICE; incl.udi:rig but.net limited

t9 BIAS, or ~REJUPICE b.a ied upo_il foce,:send.et, religion; natienal origin, ~hility~

age, seii.'Ual 'Qrieiltafion or socioeconomic s:taM, .. . , Tite !,:omm~llµlry to this ~ection

of the rule _states:. Ajvdge

. lllllStperform
. ,l\l_dklal dutii::s iin,Ra:rtially and fairly. A

Judge who MAl\TIFEST'BlAS on ANY basis mo preceeding lMP.AlRS the

FAIRNESS of the prc,ceeding and btings the Jud\ciary Joto DISREPUTE....Faeial

give tQ p'_attie8 OR.LAWYERS in the proceedin~.Jurors_; the metlia .and Olhfc~$ an

0

APf'EA.RANOE OF JUDICIAL BIAS. Ajugge MUST b~ alert lo avoid behavior

6
 that may b1; pe.rceivecj ,at preJucUclal. (f) b1 p.iirl. .. ,Ajudg_~ shall not inltiate; permit~

or consider-EX
. PAR.TE f:OMMUNICATiONS.
- ._ . :or,c~msider
·. . ·. commun:ications
other

ruade to the judge-quts-ifie' llre presence of the pqrtles cofrcentln,g a _pendin~ or

impending JJi.o¢eeding: All attached hereto as e:xhibit E. Plaintiffcan qnly offer the.

Jbl1.owingjlleadfr1gs to show the court':s bias and impartiality towijrdl'l.am}iff as .ti

.regards l<'.> pefc~rs oeirigoawarded summary jtii.lgment and ccr:tainli causing ~ -

_attoa:i_ey to piiy {or bri~g alfu,oJous lawsuit. J<'u:st1 e;miJ.Jit Lis tlte docket for this
matter:lllld shpwin.g tbe $0mplai.4t filed.on Mo:vetriber 20, 20 18 and commencing on

July ~;40Z6, Plaintiff fµ'ers' thaUs- OVt:r [2] years of lit~(ltion nnda~cqrilirig to .the

d Dcfe11dants fi_le,·a moti0n 6frole 11 fiivofous law

do.cket sh!!et not()~ TIME di_

suit, Infact. lhe .court could have. sµa .tpr:mle; caused· the rnat1er to be·dl$rnlssed.

Howzyer, neilh.er lhe ,Cl'Jllrl and certainl-Y not th!' D.efendiints fil~d.for .a'.diSmiss.al of

the case. In fact; it was tire ~lai:ritiff w!ii:tm meve ~)i oh f'01•summary judgment,

Qefcn<Jant at that time could h'ave ~asily subscrilied to their so called theo.i;y qf

frivolous lawsuit, .b~1.l tlieydid NOT, i!Qd that is i;)ecau.se nothing abm)t thatfowsuit

was frivo.lous·. Which cquld only expfait;i 1vhy Defendants continued and participated

fn the litigation, of course un less Defond~ts u.rc sayi11.g that1Irey hilled tliei'r

Jirespective clien_ts forn0ught. lhs'tea9, l)ef~ncl:ants, even afterb·e~g awarded:

SU!llmiiry judgmi::nl, -!ind the Q'rder for summary judgment was li_ie~ decide.d to

11ursue Plaintiff for wlrat'they called over 12] years l:ater:a fi:ivolous lawsµ:lt, and sadly

the court-in it's rage ag'<!iost Plaintitr s attorney for filing Uie judicial compfaiiit

7
 a~ainst judge K.enrMoDanie1~ ~cqui'esc,ed Defe11dants ili.such a ridiculous scheme to

harm Pl.a±ntili and his attorney in the ey.es of the fuirness of law.

(8) Th'e honorable judge T<en~McDanie1 is eye11J6U!ld eonspfrilig:witb tlieRarrki.n.

C0umy Qlct;ks 9i'fice !ri1-vithlioldh'fg tnc cifficial r<icords oftranseri~t in.and durins

his suitmiacy Jud!,,11nent motion -and did s.o Qause.tile Rankin Cpuoly Clerk; Beclcy

:Boyd ti;> QP,cr'ate;outsi.de 01'lfie M,R.A.P. as shewn in,exhibit F. An email.dntt:d July

27, 202.0, \veeks ..ufter the fuia l order ,,.a~ enter,ed which was July ·(i; 2.()20, 8.Iid·
addressed to Ms; B~k.y Boy,d" ~ut strangely frorh Defendruit's attorney Wes

Willi.ams. FRr e~se of follo"tVlng this motion t0 recuse and remand, ):>.~.fendant!s

,irtorney ts found sayi_ng, "I am writing to "ehirify;'' the:pr_ob.lem wJththat.s!atement

is that in ordci· to clarify then you mu:rt {lave had a conversation." As ·sue~, Plaintiff

wiis crotprivily to such eornmunieatlons_. As a;result, P1airitiffsi,nt an. enwJ to Ms.

Boyd stating iru:er_ alia, tbnt Dyf~dants Jetter was·im_p:rQper and that .Defendant was

apparently trying to get the cciurt lo'Vfo la.te Gan on Rules. Please·see exhibit_F.

Plaintiff avers that such violatip_n..ilJlJi dis:repu(e pft]i.e CanOJi Code ofJudicia1

Conduct, M.R.A,P. and M.R. Q.P. wa.s -~.p deli_ber-l}.te ,an,re.ons-pired DY tliese p:arti.;s·and

ttit; colll't until Ela'infiff suhm ifted anoth_er tetter to lhcJ~kin C_o.1,mty Cl~rk nsk.ing

the clerk t0 please send tlte.record.s as cequiretl, prilpei;Jy ~nbmi:tted, designation 0f

recpr.ds, .ang the'cotnpliuhce ari.d tliejiit'ymerit for the record was a-U prS>petly don~ and
.- ~ • • C.- 4

8
 (9) 'Knowing and afraid of tire honorable;: Judg_e K,~nt McDaniel.'s retaliation during

the sunuuary judgm911the~tin&, Plaintiff's ctiurisil:Was force.cl t_o sit at tire ab.use ~I'.

discretion b_y judge Ke1JJ Mcpaniel wbilg the j udge, al I while knowing-that

.P-l!th:itlffi$ cou11s.el l_lad fiied-a c.6mP.Jllint against h:iridnNovember $, 2019, Plainti.(f

waited lfojle1ess1y like 'all innocent dove and had no ch.(>foe but t_o sit and allow the

l1onqrable judf!ie.l{:ent Mcpil:niels.inili"ct inte1itionatano deliberate harm to·PJain+_iif

be_ciiuse judga:Keqt McPaniel was· likely .upset with Plaintiff's co_umel fqrfilirig tftc

-complaint as sfmwn in exhibit.A. of-~lis .1notion'. It follow-!l th~t Pli!futiffpo1nls to

"xhibitil, a c_opy of the Mis~i:ssippi Jtulici"al perfonnance frequently ~sked questions,

speci.fically number. 12, fWlLL"UIE ,TPDG_E BE NOTIFIED THAT I FILED. A

COb~ LAiN'l'?J 'I:Jte _filiog ofii ~ompl-aintwill-"11'0t automatically result in the the

jupge e·e:ing n.otilied. ln.s.omc cases, wheye a_jutlge's r.esponse i$ necessary :he oi: s.h.e

MAY BE NOTIFIED that a comp

.. . has been
taint . and aske.cl to address. tlie
. filed ~

aJle~ation',5 cgntained in a- ~omptamt. Hereto iiiiil¢hedas exhibif H. -Plaiutiffand his-

atJomey a-vei:s tluil the honorablejud~e K·em McDaniel Wajiil member of the

c0m1nittce w11en:Plainti.IT's coLt"nsel fil~ th.~·c.ompldiiit against Jilin.. Jt rnakes

reason'!il;,le logtc tha-'t he l<Jte,;v of the complarnt tharw~s lever:aged ag!!.i~t him by this

. attorney.regard ing the Jud&es the,n imp:ropct com;Lµct on the bench. Ple;ase s-ee that
c;ompla-ini BS: exhi):>it R,..

(10) Ihe h(?Itotabl·ejudge K-erttMcDanielevi:o attempted to eonspiEe with p_e(endanJs to

say the Plaintiff's counsel_committed ccim1naflv extortion wh1le a-ttempticig:m

9
 negotiate-settlement before the .lawsuit,V!IS filed an(l biised upon only the opinion of

theD.t;fe~fs l;llld willfdut even askiniPlaiiltilito respond to-such nllegations .

.fodgekent McDaniel said to-qefendan; after Plruntiff objected to tbe courrliearing

settlement_offers in_c0un ~d sail! e~Ject is on the record, "you should.get th_e feds on

h~r.'' Plaintiff aj}d his attorney is aj,palled that the CO!lfl will ~e the powet pf the

robe and his po$itinn to attemptto lns.tall fear in lo Plaintiff's attorney for doing_wbat

is-required of the ·attorney. Pleas~ see exhibit 1, the referenced letter from a~omey

Chris Walker to PJuintiff'-~at1ot11ey Abb~ R~bfoson after au in persoii meetin~ ai

I>Jaintiff's eounseJ offi:qe but now construed by Defendant's Hltomey Chris Waiker'iiS·

an ext.ortion. Found in that letter on p~ge I the third paragraph, ~UQrrtey Chri·s

Walker specifically says: "Iu my opfoicin;'' a.nd followed up. wifb all of w hat h_e

tho.Light were_ jhi:eafs ba~ did not ev.en menJion ru:ir SU£h i~~l o(th.reJ~ durfo_g lll'.)r at

the end oftlie meetiI).g. ln fact; as nttorn.ey C!)ris Walkei'w<l:s exiting the m'eeting we

begarrto e0.nv:ersei!!bO.ut hi~ Jl'd wife ai1<i hf.s. impressive cane, as \v.ell as his health
0

.afternavin-g sur-~ery. There was never any animosity for.b~iilg a lawyel'andconili\g

on behalf ofPlaintiff: lllease

. -. S@Plaintiff's
·.. . affiditvit reggj:raing trre same.e-xffibitS,

A_gain. this was Chris Walket enllingP[aintiff's attor11er aad witi'nghimselft<.>

J>-taintlff.'$ attorney. office t0,dlscuss-sertlemcnt~.. Ple~e sc;e P.~~gt.aph one:inld line ·

.

threeJ "We _ari:anged a meeting at our·o_ffic~ on 12/14/i 7 to di.scuss the matter. lt

'ap_pe_ar~ to me:thaLif·attorrii:y Chris Walker nad ,any n:ot±on that attorney Abby
- .

Robinson was trying to extort him orJris client then he<-bad a DU'.fY TO REPORT

10
 SUCH EXTORTION TOIHE MlSSlSSIPJ>J ~AR UNDERRUI:;E:8.3..held by the

lvlissi~PJ>f Dar:a~: "When an atfamey hasAictual kilowledg~ .tl1at another:_{l,Ltpmey

.has· vfofated a Rule.ofP.rofessional ~oml.u~t that t'.ili'ses a ~e'riou,s qµe,stion ofthat

lawyert.ntnes.s to practice law, 1hanmorriey 'has mHibligation under th~·'.Rule S.Jto

repbrtbis·fcllo,v attorney's violation. For-an.analysis on an. attorn~y!s duty to -report

.seeArt~ey Uv. Miss. Bat, (i'7S So. Z4 963 (1996)." As .such, no suc11 reporting ever

happ~rie.d_by attQ.mey Chris Walker because htdcnew th.en in 20 l-7 ~~ he kno,vs this

date, that no such·ext9rti()U_ever occ.w:red _by Elamtfff's. ottbrney is it related to chis

case.

(ll) In·f.act, there was a11oth:er attorney r.r~ent at_.1)_11ii:ntif{'g atti;mi(:y'~ office whom s~

in ·during the mee~ing of minds, with. the·parties attilriJey.s. Said attorney Tiffany

Horton-Williams Was present at that ll)_eetins and ha~ ~ffered !l sworn affidavit of the

evet1ts as·sJ.1e saw them.regarding th;al eonv~l'Safion, hercto,attacherl tis·exlilliit J .

(U) ~e~. immed.i.atc!y after thi lrreparable harrrie'd.Dama~es hearing September I,

2020, :Plaintiff's exhibit K. P.ialntiff's anomey was summoned liy Qrderofthe-.cou:rL;

honorable jud~e Kent M'cD.aniel .:itate.clthat Pl;ii.utiff•s· c.oirus,e.1 NOT Pfainfiff niust

$how c~.1,1se why tne:Dersonttl accountability offtl_ing- a:frfvolo.U'l cmriP.llii-nt,viU1 tbe

court. Please see ex.hlbit K, Judge ){ent order t:o.r damages heating, Not Jq-rowing .

lltlj: untj~rs:tand why tbe ·court Qrder haa (01i es ef'fiidciusness within i~ when the court

fir~ sta.tlng that Plai nti:ff's response to bcfendanf s, unilatei;al .set:ting 9ta hearing

moti011 was int~nti9lllll no.n -parti"'ipating wils b~da-zzlii1g Le Plajptiff and.his aitomey.

11
 So ·when th_e··hono~1b.Je judge Kent Md),iuiiel filed suc11an angry order for the

utt~ndance qf P l11iiiii.ffis l_awyer to be present at a <lamagf?S h.ear(ng·when NQ

ORDER HAD BEEN GfYEN TUAT Dli;FENDANTS l\'I01'1QNTO Al\rIEND

NOR ALTER THE COURT1S JUDGEMENT WAS EYER FILED, n_or djd

·Plaintiff consent to Defendants unilateral h.Ea.ring, was·c.onfusjng to· Pl!!intiff's

-c9u~I. As thi$ C()urt .(im se~ fu exhibit K, fhe .tourt be-~ias 6y b0dily statrni iliat

Plaintiff's couosel'could notpos·sibly be more "wrong!." when l'laintifI's counsel

fa.formed the Defundauttbatthe Cpurl di~not have:jurisaiQtioo ever the matter Doc.

~3iagairtst~~ferulant's m"btion to-.amend and alter Defendants Dae . .[222J·whii,h

was filed t\l/~ days·aftor Lill) CO.lll'.L entered _it's .final opinicin on July 6,-2020 Doc.
L2J7)and ~e fin al judgei11cnt [Poe. 21.8). TublbltL.'is tbe docket she·et for the
follo:wing of the pleadings. Pla.intiff further was ·~c.us~d b.Y th~ c'6urt to have. been

:persorrally, liablefot bring a complaint that was illeq in-Novemoer.2018 and for

which DEFENDANTSPART1<::Il'ATIID FOR OVER 2 YEARs, .and NOT

ONCE FlLED A 'Rm;E 11 sANCTT.<)N~. .As .i ;result <'>ftl\e t0ne from the bench,
Pl.aintiff's attorn.ey filed a written t'esp6n;se att.ached hereto as t'-Xbiait M, Doc. [23'5J

and-H's-attachtnents. There P laintiff r~spectfully

. -· stated on record th;itPlainfiffdid
~ ~

not believ.e that th_e court hndjurisdi.ctjon QVC?I' tlie Dialler since the 'co1:1.r t'"s own order

said ~ll -dticume($ fil~d as of July Q~202.0 was m0ot with the oi:de'. llip·courr:tlled.

$(', her~ ilgain, PlaintifOs forrnidably confos.ed as to why:the h.qnota.blej udgo Kent

McDaniel wou/9 mal.<e 11 flli.Ul& and change it days Later \iedatJse the-Defendants ure
12
 req~estfug the b¢gus alteratfoil. Plaiiitiff contend that it is the D;fea~nt~ and th~ir

attorney whom has bz0ugh t thefrivolou-s p\~ading:sr.ating,th.aLPliiintiff's claim'$ are

barred. Speflking to t[lat.nqtion, Plninllifha.s·01ought his pleadings held that

Plairltitrs c!aiins..are brought under the later. portion !)f th~·Ml~S. STATUTE CO.OE

M'N. SECTION 15-l-3.6: h.oldiug-in J!a.rt. 0~ Wl'I;H RR~SONABLE

.DILIGENCE MIGHT H·AVE BEEN FIRST KNOWN OR DISCOVE.RED. As

~ • ' • • ,- • ·"" +

:such, -Plaititiff has always contended that hi_s cause Of action is for ()pioicl induced

bowel constipati~n nnd hepatitis G,,.1is well as other claims. Please sef e.xhibit T.

Plain.tifflnclndcs me'xhlbit T t],1_

11t.evet1 Defendant undisputed cLiiins for

summary judgement did 11(it include.. any Rule lisanctfons. Plaintiffconte.tids

lhut evi:n ~ly on·iu this litigatlon,vi'hen Plruntifr, whom was ~ ·first to file f:or

Summary j. udgi.nenJ,
- I)qc,21] oilt. pfn.ow 237 d9c:uments;Uqfen(J3nts, djd not eygn

RElVtOTELY COM.PLAINABOUT ANY RULE 1l SANCTIONS, Hereto

at\achea as exhibitT. Urifdrtunate.for.Plainti:fftheDcl'c.n!i.ants. hmi~rJc;ad the

honorable jud!ffe.e Kent McDi:!!iiel-down a _rabbit-trial talks about the [21 year statute~ or

limitation, :lill wl1ile kriowingthei:e:is a part B to tlte- MISS. STATUT.{3 CODE:ANN·,

SECTION J5.J.i16. Plaintiff.followed !,h~·Jaw througl:i out all ~e_pleadings, which is.

why. DEFENDANTS-NEVER
.. .. FILED ARULE' 11 metion until after
. they. WQN

~U.Ml\iARY: JlJD(;"MENT as g111nted by thehop_orabl~ j udge Kent McDiiniel.

(13) Then:.the honor.able judge Kent McDan.;iel provided llll e_ptriion .and order of the

court aru!-then nt the c<in.venieiicc of file Defendunt's:attorncys, and will1Qut even

1.3
 ruling on th~ Jll<'>tion to muend, before ha:vi11g a hearhJg on damages, an_d .the

hohrirabli
.
Kent McDaniels violate.sJlis
.· own order,
- hereto
'
11ttach.ed-as
. . exhibit N.

The.i;e·the ..MlssissipQi Supreme Court can take judicial notice while readio.g:the order,

liorn ·tneh:onoriible ludge:1<:eut MeDarriel on pa:gF L2 e,f J2- an.d Jn tile court'~

conclu:5ion, theJ10norablejudg; .K~nt McDaplel said in thelasl.sentence: "Othe.r

matters in the 1ile pdnding hearing that were properly

- noticed
.
for J11ne 2-3-; 2020, are

not r.uled upon due what thi,r c.purt c,onsidered to: bet ll~ dispositiv.e n&ture:O'f the

f'rndjngs and conetusions herein~and the Final Jutlgm~t issued.h~ewi~. Fo.r tbc

same reason, ANY OTHER P.ENniNG-MA1 ] 'E.RS "VilCH WERE NOT

NO'! !Cid> FOR THTS HEAJHNG DA:CK,ARENO.W DJSMISSEf> AS MOOT.''

The court made and filed that order on JuJy 6, 2020 DE!i-F.NI~AN'TS Fil..EnA

Mb.TI ON FOR SANCTIONS UNDER RULE 11 AND-LLTcIOATIO'N

AC(;QTJ1\1TABII,JTY ACT on July 6, 2020 DOC,[!16]. As such, Plaintiff c1;1ul~ npt

h;we been·wrcihg saying that the Court does nor havt1 jurisa.ic#on 9v~r the Defendm1ts

now coming: to the court for ~-me\fon fots.anctioilS:.u]fdet rule .11 ahd litigatio~

·account~µicy act, whi:n Lhe c_burt itSelfalready. ruled IT WAS MOOT. EgweV¢r,

even while Plaintiff and !tls-att_oi;ney fo!Jo,yed the col.Ir('!! Ordei' lii·beHeving'.that it is-

becaus_e-Elaintiff's attem.e y _fi led a com-plaint 4gainst the honorable ju~ge.Kent

_fyfoDaruel thatjudgi McDaniel demanded P_laimiffto.-shQW t:0 a dain:ag~s h~arfugori

:a matter:that the -court itsel.rsaid was MQOT, and that Dcf¢ndaiits knew or·sholild
.have known wa~ m(itn before th_e court: But .because 1>Jaintiff ebjeoted.ro·suclL

1·4
 actiQns from-ihe County Gourt and the Defendants, the honor·ablejudge·Kent

McDaniel called Pla)Jltiff;s &ttru:ney, IGNQRANT, IGNQRANT 0:FLAW, WISH

~ WOLD STQP PRAO'JCING LAW, made.lewd comments abot1t P-lalntiff's.

attoi:ney.;i.nAfrican.American fr.ee.dom fijl~t~.r:whom cel~grates Jutie~l¥.nth the

African Americ~Fful i.day,:'ru1(i a host of otoer b_ad conduc(ftom..ilie bench. The

language and conchiet was so much so,seen as bullyin_g_l,1y this attortiey .from th~

bench, unul-Plaiutiffis attome}' 9bjected to. tqal <,llsre:sp~ctful behavlor-given to her b_y

judg~ McDaniel's and as.keel-ilie court to pleas.e. follow the c·anon.Rules. Jnstea:9, the

con<luct was so persistent, until ilie·hQJ1orublt juoge;.Kent McDaniel even told

Plaiu.tiff's:attorhe_y you are in ·adit~b and ili_~~g a deeper hole everyiirne Yilll open

y9ur mouth to ·objeet. Of course·this informati9n is all r\:Cct.tded by tb~ court r~or.tef

but not orrly has judg_i:: KelilMcDanieJ hin:d~r~d fu~ admlni1:;tratioil ofjustice by

t~Hng. ~!inldn Pounty Cler~. ffeeky Boyd: not to give the records tbats])p\11.d have

he6i timely prnvioedAugust 28, 2029 but he-even cawied thisrec9fd ~o:b~ del~yed

for anoth.el' 30 day,_s from S,ej>tembe.r, to20. J>lea.se sc'ec.xliibif O, an email tp Rankin

County's Clei·k, B.ecky B()yd.stating th.atjudgel<ent McDaniel's told hc!-·not to

fol low the M.R.A.1'. and J11;9Ytde the trau~gript hy August 2.8., .2020. Plain.!i'ff·eontend

that to this. d.it~ there ,s..rio showfngbn the dookej that said tecords have been

;;le.etronl.eally filed 0r oth-erwise. And as ex~eoted, !htf-hnnornble judge K$nt

McD1inle1s U1med around the n_ext day, Sep.tcmibei' 2.2.Q2.0 :and filetl an cird~r that he

has limj_ted contjli~ingJ uri~di~tion ever thls ri1:atter and clearly this.was ·anyther

15
 RETALIAI9RY"f0 PJ,AINTIFF'S ATTORNEY TO S.HOWATTORNEY
THATTH.EBENCR.GAN DO'WHATSOEVERHE l ,IKESAND THAT
• • 4 • • • • • '

PERSON,46 TilE CLE)l,K OPERA'{-~ :A.CCORD.ING TO ms SAYlNG'NOT

THE ~AW. Piease s.ee ~ilii_tl', the order from the bench alqng w.i1h1t'.s O\.VD

exhibit ofPlatntiff's exhibit 0 . .Plalrrtilfhimsel[, a'l{~rs that this is siniply. corruption.

.b:Y a'si(tingj.udge-in the state ofMissis.si_ppi and should n_ot be t~!et:a(~cLQythe

ty!iss.is.sinPi Supreme Courr.

(14) Then._a..~ Plaintiff expected .fr:01li the rull1oriibletndge K1mt.Mc:Oanicl 'son Friday

S_eptem\ier 4, 202.0 sent <iIT ei.nail around 5:00.p.in. Plaintiff'~ uhihit Q, s;ietiog

reasons that t_he. colll't feel~. will sil~~illitiate

~ . a.Missis_slppi'Bar Coriwliiint against the

Pla\ntiff'silttomey. As sucl); Plaintiff i.s including the foe.ts of this case for th.e

Mississipj,i'Bar, but h_as in~luded,he s_ame infoµn1;1ti_0Il to this Mii;sissippi Supre1ho

Court As a re.sµlt, PliJ.intiff.>s attorney mal,(es tlri;i statement.

(!.?) Judge K:~nt Mc:Da.tiieJ!s h11s inlentiona:lly,and delihernt~ly delaye_d_this nonpreper

adjudi\latiqn. ofa hearing

- - . Just S(? that ,theju_
dge Kt\ntMc{)nrilel.eould,-AITACKED

,PLA.INTlFF'S A'.f'{ORNEY WITJIA.:PERSONAL i\'10NE1ARYLIEN

AGAINST'HER 11~ THE Ai"\10UNT HE ~S t$ 85.-% Of' E.i\.JJLTFOR

BRINGING wn.u ;rm: <;;Ol}RT SAYSJS A FRIVOLOUS LAWSUIT, the

court, glirlng the dama-ges beai:ing a.llowed Defendapts attorney to puL on the.record,

damages exccedi»g s;173 ,000 and then dtiY,,$. ln_tcr amelip the :s;mi~ n 1tiher fo excel

lhnt ~ni'().LII)l, :md s_till contributil)g the neru:ly .$206;000 .to Jilaintiff's.attomeyf'or

16
 bring Plainttff proper. lawsuit. Plaintiff's attome.y that possiblyilie honorable jud~e

<;ynthiaZr~wer .co1iveyed t<:ffiie honenibfo Kent McDaniel h:ow she Levied Pl!!iritiff's·

onorney with a $1,90.9 <lollars. p~r day jt.J:dgtnent(at least from tl.i~ :b:ench) as·weu as .

c;iver $.2.QO,OQO dollars iii µttomeys-fees:to Plaintiff's .attemey H_OA, (that m:auer is

currently before this court oll'appeary. ~ur~y tl1at along,vith the facnhat this

attorney filed aj1,1cU¢ia1 c(mipl,alm ag-.iJ11stjudge Kent McDaniel for conduct

"¥nbe.ci;iminJ\ ~fa judge.and certainly. a sitting m~mJ,er oftbe Watchdog cori1mittee, IL

£011,owecl th.lit jtidge.McD,aniel ilie.n at.tributed 15% of said fuult of the Plaintiff's

l~w~uit filing to him, the Plaintiff. As-a result, all Plaintiff carr due iS:g~~~.s that i_s ·

for, he g1;1es_s be 's being p11Ill$hed becau_s~ liis ii:ttOmcy fikd the j udidary ·comklaint.

Th.e pro~le.m wit.Ji what thl.s attomey believes i5 wrong about U1e court'.s order fa that

dte'eow± is holding•the att.Qmey persqnally showsJltat jue:lges kno\.v they can u.sed
the power of-the-office .and robe t.o retaliate 'again~tattotneys aiid certainly litigants,

S.ee\'5nd, the hp.110,rablc Jue:lge.Kent McDanlel likely'knoV:,s that Plain.tiff's attorney

'
couldnot nor will oot be able roJigh( 1;1 mone_t~ry judg¢ment worth $100;000 .thai $11~

hci;s~lfwould be:req.uired t.o pay at leaM according. to the lidnorable'j.udge KenJ

McD,anleJs, Thir·d, the court's ill repulsive collill!i;t i~ t,o cause Pla1ntiffto lpse bis

11pp~I or even end $~appeaj beca~ e to stri~e Plaintiff's.~ e y wfth a personal

mon<lJaryj1,1ggrnenl.li~ety. would atopPlainfitl'from <loiug exactly \\!hat thc,v.~,

Supreme Court 14th:Ainend1uent oa lls DUE PROCESi the' tc-0utt i:s trying to cause .n

financial ruins·tc_i.Plain~i:ff!s aU9rn~y; a1ia whJ:it's·sad i}b6ut itis the deUber-ateand

17
 Jntenti.enal way the: ho.norable judge Kent MeDaii1ets went a-bout to harn1 PlaintiJf's

:attorney and .uitimately the PlaJntiff, The lrulh QC toltt,

. it is
. 'a knowi1 factthat the-'

.hnnorab}.e pynthia Brewer, Diirlerfe"~al lard, fotmer member and Kent McDaniel are
,g(~Lfriends, Pli!irrtiffdoes not complain about a fri_en~ship, ~ut rather if suc_b

friendship cxpo~nds in!B the work e.Ithe l:iench, and c.aus~ said frlends_bip to h@ml th~

,,ery citiz~Ji$;1hey are iirplacc to serve, then thafis a prohl~m not just fur the st~te of

Mississippi blll rather the country ·of th~ Ohitcd Stat.es. Plaintiff ::cv~ts·that inju~i~

anywhere· is. inju~tif!l everywhere. As sucli, juage C~thia Brewer whom ruled eve.r

·Plaintiff's attom·ey_personal racial homeowner.s issue that is cun:ently befqr.~tli.;1

fyfissiSSiP,pi Suprem~: C::our:t, arr(\ whi.ch b~s qu·esl;io.ilabl)"cilll'sed devastating results to

l'lnintiff's aLLqmey.in:cluditrg Plaintiff's attornay giving up.her family home: P!aintiff

ki1owing these facts believes. that judge kent McDaniel wi~ 6r witlit;itittJfo,assistant

o.f.de.(en_danfs attqrrte.y~ h.av9 launched an foteiitional nnd dell.berate-attack against

Plain.tiff's ;momey for personal reasoru., not law.. Pla-intfff's. emll!it c; shpwi! aU th~
sam.e names-affiliated with Ule 'V'll:tchdogJrrQ\:IP, Mississippi Corifrrfission ofJudiclal
Performa:n{e. Unbelievably; judge Kent MeDaniegs name ls the second name undet

the-headin& when a citizen J~,oes·lOthe \\'.ebs·ite_qfthe M,issi:,s.ipj.)1 Commi~sion of

Judi~ial Perfr?rnµmc~. Plaintiff ~.o..nt.en.d.tha.t he 1ind:Crs.tands t11at the-1deal of a ".only,"

ris judge KelitMcDauiels,said in hfa letter to the Miss·isstppLBar::aml th~ pllrties

cx.hilitt Q, has becn,bar:red m practioelflwin ~he state o.f Mississjppi fqrrteridy fSJ

ye_~ . ·and tbel1onQ'rab.J~:cour1 jpcfgc Kent McD'ilniel's feels like that may not ev~n

18
 96liie :dlose to tlie Defendants atturney's:p:i:a_ctlcing .law in this case~ rnitilely. Chris

W~l:ker.anil Wes Williams. il0wever-, Plafntiff1s uttorney riIBJ<Qs.his.dctlaralion: "I

was mu,gl).t iiml trained to tlnd the law tlfat sup])orts,the 11rg,;iment. r have .done lha.f in
ihis,ttrul ea'oh case.that 1 have filed while lawyering. 1simply d<.i not unders:taml what
real aiifer.ence i.t nral<es as to !iow long iUavryer oas been _practicin~ since the law

ilitecl has been titled "good law." U is the I.aw ai:id the file.ts th~1t nial<es~and creates tbe

case, notihe lawyi;r-. BuJ. sirice 1 h.i)v.e bifen liringir(g unfavorable eases before courts,

l have gon\:ii vel)• mu.Ch $() use to i:>eiug critiqued by .!i0ll1e' that I knoWjfvthing.

l>eJ:haps such.statements are justifi,ed to .th.cm, hut.I kno_w this much, 1 ;un m:it:il young

Wllman,1 h~ve always been fascirrated-with the.faws that govern this ~tate. ln fatt, it

wis not until my child .graduated from the Universi,ty

. ofMi$sis.s:ippl
. that I decided to

pm_sue a career in the l.e g;t field. B·efpri::"then, I wuuld resear-0h and seek,mt

information r¢garcffng the _practice of law la this state, h9plng that on.e day even)

C.OUld lielp make a difforence to some9ru: like·the Ptilinti:ffiQ this cruie. 1 thOUg_ht 1

di,d, llµiil 1 .f6un~ out that 1 am pavierleS:s against .s iauts -0f wrongful maybe even

c9rrupted juq_ge$. Other thfur filing-this motion to recuse ·antl:see,king that this c:ouri

u1iciue the damage<lo ne)y Lbe Clinil;inan j)_f.tlie l'v1ississ.ippi Co11unission for Judicial

·perfurman~<:, U1e h9noi:able judge Kent Mcbanie~.and takini this forum to th_e.~j~r

iiliidi-a'oufleL~(those outl!:ts ·usually help the pubUo to know wbaJ, wh{j and liu.w-a

.court is being/ an), there is not ~thing thatan atton\ey Gari chahge aboutconuption

19
 (16) Las~ in .expecting the h:o!lOP.iQle }udge.Kent Mcl%p:ieJ to ·again eehave opposite of

the Oanou G::ode of J.udicial Conduct rufosi PJaintiff's.- couns<;l ~gain \fil~d her

SECOND judicial performance c(}Jllplauir ~giilnst judge Kent McDaniel on

Sept~m~er 2, 207<0 as evident by tti'e FedEx delivery receipt dated Septem~er 3, 2Q20 .

.Pleaie -see exll'lliit R, a desc-cipti<;m oi'the·wroµgt1.1~ condu.ct oftbe -honorable j 1;14ge

Xem McDa:nii:l du:rfag::a Wrongful hearinw,as provtded-above.and the nHachm(,Ills of;

thts motion.

(17) Jllaintiff.has ati:i:iphed his·aflidlivit regarding the conduct ofthe Court, atfamey Ctu:is

Walket and Wes '\Vil] iarrts., P l:iintill's exh iblt S.

CONCLUSION
In the friterest ofjustice and fp_r t.he integrity of this Mississlppl Judicial Court system,
,Plaintiff and his: atto~y pmy_s thntthis e_ourt wi 11 immediately cause thiinnatter lo be
reversed and tende:recl \o anpth_er jud_ge and jU!')' Lliat wi 11 be. f,1.i r to the 11oldings of the
1viississippJ Stlp_reme C;ourt R:ul~~si}r, amplifi:ed in wcitmg-jh the Canon Code ofJu:dicial
Conduct as a~(!p_tec!Jn 20.92 \>Y the Missi~sippi S11P.renie Court

RESP.E~TFl!LL\'·SUBMfTTED ;/sfAbhy Robinson(i'vIBN105157)

ABBY1t0BINSON & ASSOCIATES LAW:FIRM PLLC.

-.· . . . 221 'E. PEARL STREET ..
JACKSON, MISSlSSlE.Pr 3~20 l
pn~ne: 60Js321-9343
Fa.x; 60L-4!l7-6326
Emai I: arobi !1$onlawfi:nn@.yahoQ.e6m
Email: abby@askahbylaw.org

20
 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

T, A6by Robiris'qn, tlie undei:signed attorney, hereby certify iliat I have:this (fay 8th clay of

Septem.bcr) 202.0 elecironieally l'iJed a (!J.1e'imd ~Qtreet C,.Qpy o_fth.e above and {oregoir/g

N2tice ofAppeal \o the folk>w:

.Honor.ilole :Keitt.Mc:llsuiiel
215 East Govermnc-nt Street
B~a~don, Missisripp.i 39042 ·

I·~onAfable-\Vesley Williams, ITf

Markew \V,1lker, PA
PQS( Office J3ox I 3669.
Jackson, MS 3_9236-3_§1J9
w,villwns@rimrkewwalker.com
-.,.\ttomcy for .Qei~~t

IIoil.oiable Chris :r. Walker.

~1~kow Waik_e;, PA · ·
PQst Offi:~e Box l.3.669
Jae"k;on, MS 39216-J.6"69
c.1 \s,lk~markowwalker.com.
Atro~ey for_Defendant

B.onotable.Roy Smith
Daniel Col<ef Da.rileJ Ct>'ker
4400Old ~~torr Road, Suire 409

21
'.Jickson,.MS 3'9211
601-969-7607
rsmith@danielcok~r.com

& Abbv Rohinson <MSB 105J57)

227 E. PEARL STREET
JACKSQN, MISSIS-SlPPJ 39.291
TELEPl.IQNE: (901) 32 1°9c:143
f:ACS1MJLE: (~_QJ) 487-63_26
.
-Em.iii I: arobinsonla}vfinn@yahoo.com-
Em~til:.abbv@aski:rblfy!aw.eom
E-Filed Document Nov 19 2020 14:06:05 2020-M-00995 Pages: 6

AB - -------<------ ·
T II t,: MI S:sJ s ~ I 1!1' I BAR
l'<>,t Olli~e:Boi: 2168
-- - - ---- --- - - ·--~
JocMon. .,flsshippi .lV'..1$,21&/l
f"~i:.-phu!lc! {6Q I ) 918-0$6~
OmreM Ucrh:raf L lll"Erl
I'~~, (601) 60~-7~59 •\Jwn ll. klhro,r
;.,...;i.. ~"
t.-m!lil os~m~~"''8 M1\hs..~(t ~llmm-St,.m
\Vtbs'iti,:,·vww.m~ .{lrg_ /Jy' ... !,.-1,t:1 "'"
Dcl,wi·11 ~. 5flJHh
N,)vc:imber J 7 ..Yeo •w.,smriiJ. '(.·,,

s·H1 [ VlA U.S MAIL

Anb) dale Robin~on
2 21 E f'e;rrl S.1
' lacksi:ni.
. '- . MEf3. 1)2D l-3202

RI!,
·- Docket
. - . NuJ11ber;.-,2Q. I55--11

Our office receive.ti a IJar aompJaim filed !,ly Arlam .!:l. Kilf!nrt. 13J~~l'.111sc lt 11ppears to o™e.11
ilie
possible vtp.!atfon of one. or m.e.re clt' Mfasissippl 1lu~,; ef Prr:iiess.lomil Cond,ucr .("1vl.l~ P{"').
the..llitr,requiros dwt ¥911 resps)nd J)urs>uau1 ro Rllle 8, I fbJ, MRPC. Y111w re~ponse A1 ll8l include
certitt'c:ato lli.u. y~u sent ~:Y of the rc.5ponsc to Llir tou1plalna1lJ,
~
Pll>a.~e ~,1bmi1 a \.\.'rirrei_i:r~~nse·10 th() Oar cumµIaim ro Ollf office b) l 2/l 7t.:w20 by regulru
tnail or email lfS'a ~glc pelf.tile. Beellusc we <ih:otroruc3.lJ.v scar; Pll(ler rk1cmme1H,;; d1;11101 hin,J
or ~tar,Je nny p~ gfJ.he response ifyE,u. hmil ic.

If you need a.dtlitl_onilJ time to respond. s~nd Oi.rr·ollke, ,l 1jmely, wrin~u request for•ei.ioi)S'iou dl'
ti.rne-m.1he adrlrqs~ a]jove. lf we hii11e nl()( reciived your 1~J'.'lllt~e by l.21171:lO;W, the Comml.i:tee
trey 1:.0JiSic!~r-your milurc tore$_P.Qrid ti;; a vioJmion ofT{ul~ S. I (bJ. MNPC, iil.:1ddiiio11 to 6J1Y
~Hbstaotive nlJegatio!is in the.i::omp.faint. Yow ~un~e is t-he initial aucl Jilt~ p~rt oft&
iu1·estlg_ntoty ptoe.;)ss'by which 1he C~mmf1_t~"-Ol1 Profo,'1ri1u1t ~i:sponslhility di:immiines
whether iher'-' is ol~r.and cqnvi:ncmg eviden.:e of~ viulhtl1.m of the t-1Rl'c; If Yo.u fa il ro fi Jc n
rcsp<;1u.,,-;;. the Comn1iite.¢ Wiil ciilly have the h.Gneff( uf'tlx· compllliruu:U:s v~iu~ ol' 1Ju~
allegations
accum1c inclllc.!.
review ore,i.:Ithe
in-the cu1J:1p1'aiUL Tliccreft~re, your r~p1)11Be 1~.t:r-ili~nl t0 a thn!'JY :ind
manec,

~iacerd)•.
\\'f 1\l/.d/1:>'11,S: SctJ(I
D~ptJry Gcuemf C;:,wl-"el

/i:.to
- 0
EX..ATBIT

' _F --

- - - - -- - - - - - -- -
- - -- - - - -
 *lloc.ket No. 20-15:.-JJ
(~OMPLUNT
RE:ADJNSTRL!CIJgN1. CA.REfTil,LV B ~FORli:
COi'vJPI.ETIN(i'PRlNT R T ~' f'l n•-1 lJ.LACJ( INK UST
·ONL y ONE II TTORNrv l' rH FORM

PA.R'.FONE: I. AJsm El._Klfaorr.. In mv c-aonc-rrv il5 u,mcrnJ uitmsul <if I ho: Mbslssippi Bar
P.ost Office .B.ox 11 68, .laekson. lv!S 39?~:i r60 l ) 948,Q,li&
(your name. addtcss. risili phnne-nmnticn
do he-rehy file witf1 The Mi$sissippi Bar li eompla_!nl all!un~ Attorn~·:

A bby Gal& Robinson, Tl7 IJ Pearl.St. JatkSlin. MS.J9)1H-3102 --~ -- - - -- - - -

.l'AR;l'°TWO:
nnd thiic/Htormw? res:l.!fy ~bout ivhaLw,15 ,ijicf, •Jnn,,_ni;it ;!om; llr &greed upon by ::vu
L'i!n any· peJ:s9uNo
~ '·Y-estror.::.No··

BAR'r T ffi{EE:
(A) 1h<1< Sj\ie,;ifl.: thing nr things ]compluining nbpni I~er ar-.i: .See imachcd for nossibl~
w11
_yinJatiiJns-'orRlil&s 3J.J.2 3A(n'). 3.4/dl. <L4fnJ. 8.~i'.Jil, l-/A/d)
('.B) h:i ;lllpporl of those thiu; j 11,_red-aboVe, 1he fat-'ls of ru_, co111pl1iiiit arc:
_1J1~Bar Complaint ls being illeiJ as a .r<:sulr of die Conunitte-e on frnfesslonaf Resnon~ibillty
rec~ivinc 4i(ormntion from a illdg£;pursu;mt .w hi!< u,citl!l' , 1!li!,,."'!illl.1mde_r _Cm~<>rt 3, d\12'! nr"Tli£'.
M ississ'iopJ.Gide of'J udicia l Conduct. Upllrt receipt u~ tl1J.~ .In tonnatloo h y the QftTce ufi::1eneml
C61in,:el fur Th<! Mlsslssippi Ilat. it \Va~ Ior-wardi.:4 11.,
• •
,h.- t ou11niuee fcrt fts consl<lcrntion and
• + -

dfrccrion.a\ to. whec/rer it arc iculiltcs II J?O$sfb!e vlnJmJoo G/'!~c· Mf~,isslpni Rules of Prufes.,ionnl
Coniliicr a~d worrnnt, tlie fi ling of a Bar CorupralnL Y~>l!r r.cspon-s:-~ should address rhe rssue:s
Hnkulmed LIL tlie m:fuchc<l dolllmic:intfa).

---
PART F(Jl!R: ·ni.c fu~t-s in th.is C<,nnP.liiintan: trot~ and ,:,ml:ct IP lhe hesi nfmy k-.iowledge,
PAHT.Ff\,'E:. I hi:>reby cei:rify that r have r,:ad lhe c>.pl.l!Mldl} hoQklec that. I lwvc hc.~o pr-,wfcled.
1Jo m,1 ha~·any (1ue~11oa s with n,gard IQ nny ifl_formt11i1>11 inttuded in the i,oa~l~t.
11 11 7(2020
{l)!l(e)
( Your Sig:uarurei

EXll.lBiT ONE.=
 .fu."1>1'At~61.
Co-JJ:ry lit•~j!:
mtlM.<.!IH. RKOl\\!F
Sep1em.bar 9, 2!120 f ',,c)U.:n:lyfil:I£t

B1morable L\tlal11 Kilgo,re, General Gounsd

TJic Miss1$.$ipplllar
e. 0 . Et>x 2f68
Jackg_oll', MS 29225:-116:~

Dea..:Adam::

A/it14'~#-® ~~J\fbion, I ~"~Ersf~~ft::~

. ed fnME~-in or.der apt t_o d,'}pdve
A!lol1)~' A;~byOaJacRol-i11ison of~~lf~ft ~cevany (1fher-prp;ccJural ditQ )ltoc-0ss.,uooJ
the fhr-and/or:tha api)l:llote~ .ilrf(j} h~ave-aeted, The Hxlfibi~Jt1,11n the,hea$g whi~Ji-un;
r~d_!\'.' Llt1'{win2~ ;ir,e Jil~ with ilio ~i:f!. l.nitE.xhibit 'iii 4, Ddeas_y CiJIU:!S~l.'~ li\Piog
:swemcn~. Ifas ~ ll $Gllloo'hu't omx-i?E (IP.Crie4}>y 1h., B;ir or any ef-the v~r-DJZ<!l)lzatlons w hlc'1
:r;11ii1 ~(S!1;ig'"1i~ to, indud~ l'IM.~;~j}jif~m.miss!oa on .f'Ulilc.@J'Effi,j •®nrec the
Tw6jrietfrCireuirDistrii;t'/\1!_Q,ii.iey J'rih~ R,. ''Biieba" Br!'.mli!lt. ancLU~d S.'taies At19ruey
11.-1.ieh~d fl ll!!i,. [)tave tens1m to belleve,thaFthere-[s' )1Ton11blc: cai.,~e,thst l,obinl!Qil ~ ;;ngagt:d In
crlminahrctivif)' in t1iis_x1nclc.~evetal:mhe_r c;1s_i ot=i•,hJcli iI,js cour1 h:ti l>ee!'! 111il!f9,awarcslnce
J:i_Jiug irs Opinfon last F'riduy; I P@Y t[i.Eanvlu &lt promp~y to remove this.-!a\\Ycn'r.(!ffi the
Ftlll~;-she.ls ffll em~s;nilllJ \Q.every member who lirfll)itei< Irr.our couns:

Only-~ c.ut~Ory mquii;y wtu m~ y.:;m im4.Jne Ct•nJmmee awure thaj. the ntlscondt,et
d'eseribe~ii1 th.~ encloS<-'<I Opilll91l.iii .s!nnam!:ptactice ibr Ms, ~ohio§on.· fn fact; on Snruraay
afilr tlli1)8'Jlly OJU!lli)ll-!JJ'.idq'(eji.1%~1eav~ the Judgm.,ml llWarda,:,aiJable:01.1 ME~, I w.is 11,w
by·another forme.r AJ;,A an<f A:tlSA lfou-shi:liatJ.~ ptecii«'l.y th~se Sml'Hf-tm.1i()ll ofmllkiugmot
Just legal,tht_eil_t!I !jut pei'j;onal and-pwf~.9li.!,rbiea_is 111s<1lnst n..11olher Joi:tor w lia fuve<{ in imd
pai/:!:seufement mo.ney l o her-and hei, client. He,app,irenily hM som~ fs;'ues .thnt c;:;us«f him !O
liscnewJ.itig_at1on, but I 11$.ltc ;,:Qt1Jlmt Dr. Winkelmann hilri Ju1·sucli cobQem3, Tb.:tt el<'P.l.ains
whv !1~ his counsel lfeclfned to-J(riUcklenucler IO':absurd nm! u11fi;Junded thre:it~ l,ut defended her
-sp,;ri,,us cJi4n:):~ ~ -ti\k~'lSe. 1'11111 dt1g$!9.Jl cb_st lhe;n-neady a quarter 1nilllori CT()llm-s in u.,~le!'s
dcfc:ns~ c:nsis,over nearly two~ ofn1Jga_ti0Ua lbe demi!., ufw.hltt I fo1uid to be her nrgultbly
il!c:~~l'.lld cJcruly UllpnJ(~~umnJ ~cti viiy m:e:in !:k Opimt~n. ..,,-1 l will flOt ri,pearthem hei'(;. ·

· 1-

f {;. ~ t)-9' * Omn<hit, Mist.lmr,p1 J-9()lJ

(601),US.1474 • .,_,. !f,QlJ .... ~ J

- - -
 I have :u;;,;, lea:rn~a <?i11ce filing·my. Opinfon thut .i numl,a,J of 01berjudge.~. bnlh-S-taienot!
Federal hlu,., ~ncoUl!Jea·,J tlilpro(tt,1onf;j condlli•t b, M,1\•rnt-011. r n:cd,~,1 on Frida, nigh r
f~Jl!.lwi.-ig.my J).tdglll~nt ~.efa~)'i!ect, .i liuCUr.llrlll tha( ,11 lwn fil~tf tt: l $ DiSlrfo( (:_(,llli-C ('.fl.~
No. 3)7.!T-av-004 J8-DEl-FKB w.hereinshe 1;1ll!Stis_e,,; Distnct.J udge .lorilan {or biffe tiandid
of
,,l.escriptiQJJ her lack:ut' commuruortii)n s_l(ilJs. This doe>.lll1ent,Ju.'l1 PlJ$ted.on PACER un 9;3
as Do,~uirumt 19, was ,,'1!]f[Q me Friday rri.,<iht by a la.wyeffamilfor wlih that case Wh(J l:md been m
eny court for SQrni (if the hearings in fhe imsfii.at CIISCI, ! have 11tt1clmJ il:.QQP)' ID tiie ()\ient Judge
,/ordiuU1~ riot eontacted-ilie'BaL .My fellow J~vyer al!ltl .idvi~~ !hatRc,bin.son has had ·
~oJUrimtations and sim:it:U' dis.r.es~ prnbtem~ with. /,in,Ja_4.JiaeR1011, s blneli/fo1nnle ~gislx,lfa,
·lu!J I win ~,qd you-ofthe item prevto.usfy s;;,i1t re{larding Rebin!OJJ 't; conflict wlLi U. S.
Magistrate Judg_e 011rgiu1n.in}Jattii~bur~.- ln shor.r, Shi' 1S tii,~rdugfil)' llllproJ'es_siQmtl tUli'l
confrontational:m.flor·1...-1:ter J~ cif re-spcet for many IJQUrt,, e5pecially ir:tcludi~ thci oire Mw. 1
She-.has-l:h,;:'.~11<lm;i1y in ·he.i:Jil:ing h!efore Ju(ige f9rmu, re cmll h<irself11 ''fi'ce-dom ligh}er"
l<>Hruric.t Tubman, ''rlwta 1viim_li.t\ livlne Ju !I hig honse~inf!IShionahle Bridgewntcr
~
\!llrlip"31ltb]~
tile nei:ve-ro ~"-Otnpw-e ~tli:elf•lQ a ''.nlttl" tree.1om n gtitr,r IUJLI hero ls.ilisi,:sting.

J1iision ,;if.!ilitu~1>-is, l believe. ~ I t ~f,.I lc;t,, <1ne mcn_tal evnditi~ f.roni. whlth she
::sufie;~s; 11llllig_i¥lJlt ~ a.rciss1sti'¢ Pe!J.:ina!tt1_!.)isor<ler, ~Jiaps Cllu~l.ed with b!Dtl:eated bipolllr
tll!;cfrJer. ln my expeneni;e wlth.li\lU]ttld'endaors-an<l 1rr-espa11.~lb!c pare.ms t-efore me in.i;:oUrL
with these dfaordet;;; asproially-NPD, rapf..1 repllir ig 11m 1•,;11J1srio. -Suffi:rers·heiieve they Hl'Q
com:ct,-aru:I tl.u,:refo~ c.:m n9r be "fixed" ~Y out.$J~e Im~i:venlion;,hey gcnonuJy take c;mmsel ~n!}·
from hurt.You llllly-want iP riifct he,ro IJAP for a pmtessic,naJ evaluution. In ruy vl!:w,
1.1i!DiJs~lvt1s,
UiNt coii!i:1-not

Aclan,, J b!<g;.thu Bar.Connnittee-«i lake d~isi ve nctum a.nd 1fo i_i qui..-k)y. SJiec-is·a .loose
cannon nnd tfn erriti.nrr;issmem-ro c'l'efyoQe wno, cm:es about the in(~grfry of' the llar. / have told
you J;,eforci .ind relJ ;vou agaii:i, Ihere i$ absolutely no way ilfl)'OUe wirb communicatiotJ (wrirl.:n
and or,aI) -skills rhat an, norjiisfdeficient bm often non-cxisient could hav!fr~ei.ve4H luw deli7ee
from an m~cre<llte<l law shllooJ or pl!Sseq ii~!![ eJC3ft\inauon. !fihe ~vt:r lii!tl satisfactory eJJJ,rac!tr
.and fi~s; /1 ls !01)g:go110:now. ·PJliii~do Something llfQillJlUY, ·

Withow a~gc~ting ho\V,'<)11 and the Commiu~ uugi)t ,o rrocce<l with Yout
fuvcstigation, sho.1!1d yqtt initiate-on~ I UIJl(I yi;iu 10 lntervic" her cl iem in th is case, DtUJie-1
Shop_e. · <::i:insrder taking teslimo1:1y fromJiirn undc.r oath wirhout her pr~ent; If he is tr.uthful

The Jack of b:olh wriuen and l'crba] .sk.itb J~ ex!r<tmr:ly emham_!l.<1ng lo tho court ai1<il'my
lawyei:s hellring_het, l'.~9ing ber.subm_issio11, 9!' watcl~me her-in <.Qµn. For exmnp.lc, in.one of-liar
'·otiers~ to fllJ!, $!1e atlnout<\'S aq:uc;,Je ·1Q rlre Mi:,.sis,1ppi S1.gmm1c C~un. but n "'i3S'ciled ,is "PJd~
Uutliority. ~irre WJougl,, there Was m,.such.c.1.sc by out SufiTe111e Court arid, !ll(e numy jud.ges. J
d;;, n•.>! '-'Onsider Nililli C,:itciu1 pfee..'<lent as.au.1.hotity, parti1<ul,;:rJy when. 11;~wrongly atuihll!!'sf 1\1
,s
olll' Supren,e:c~url. J US! lf!i [ wns. wtitln!,[tbis, lin(lllfe:r Judgs 1r, ti, cpun~hpw,;,:J n,c o m<,tro,1
;·she ffie,j tpduy Jn 8 _fuJi,i:iy ecintl11i\l CJlSt ,viierein she argue·, n pteposierou~ vkw or I.he lo.w, fl
JUSt !MS . lliQre snd 111ore etnbattai;~. s.iag to mewitl:reach. thiri1phc files.

-2--

- - - -
 (fmally?),J b.elle.ve he.is the ~:Y t.o con1im1ir,s my uodm;gs about IK'.r role mthe perjurod
te,.,frnony which I l"-'lieve ha.~ hecii pr.e.senred !(, (!J I " ·- 11 thii i.:;1~~ I am '"') 11;,p¢<'! ('J "1\,,1·
of[he int'ifonation ha naR prov1rteJ, ej;pe._CJ.il./Jy n1 th.:c "'<>D11uiiruwit.mli.!JmJ 3~ E\hlbtt #12 to U1e
<lam;igesllearing. lt was mere fully d~,se~(l m 1hc llpmiv11 and l\la,S convcnfoncly geuemted iJ1
response-ro;~~ wiilun mere days fol/owingDefe-utl,-mt', Motion for S UJJ1ll1llr)r Judgment. fftbe
flar ~Q;S..llol ~~ tQ-i utcrvi!!w Sl)lipe, L"e)fnecr law cnforcement wm ~<' ilia! :'11-sQme poim,ginoe
.subornation {)f_perjury is·a.felony, particularly when it ~ present~d to the ~our[ as trll.Lh inrended
t(l be relied 1.1.P.911 by tfieeo.1Jrt. Unfonuumely fur)efs R,,oi!fson,-by the time !his l\llS pr.e~hted to
me"J no lpngtr &>..lieverl muc)l·ofimythihg she said or pF!!~nted in !tffidavits: ·

A!i.You liaa sµrmi~-lrQuuny Opinion, tll~re=J.,, mw:ll morel" could:/lily in:furilicmriee ot

ihiscoIQP.Jaint. My origJn:aJ granr <'it" $llllllIBley Jucjg1lli:'m hes been aj:lp~c!al tQ Circmc Court, itnd
[ i:a-p~ h to oa~ t i lo c\fa, luffer coun{s-). r e~ t l?l}'-a\\.'llJ'tl of damtJ&'l!<l pur~ to the
I.AA will:ruso be~pp_ealed. M;;,'U:iwhi!e, I hnpe )'ll.\l amt the COmmittec:>vill ~ iwtiQ,1 uu my
c.-.mpfoint ~'ioultj,_l'.O\tdo-so, 1 will nml<e.n1}'6"e/fhvailithle 10 meet wiiliyou ofanyll!ember ot
lh.'<""(ull t;:prrtmine~,flt yourconvenreue¢, ifn~cd I consi.dertW1.-as iruponanh 1s.Z1y1run.(l
g_o.ing on;iu.m;y·coun at_presant On the: other hand, I b~tleve the Opl.iliot1 C()Jllatns cqncl~\l!lS
on.di thtiinfonn.µm.n l h~ <!t1h!l" tim~I s igned it, Mei the ExhlbicsSJ.'Cak mr ~ ves.

Bu<;!. Cuu!fd~ntial 6 opy of (/pinion

C~; ilonor.ab!e Micliael Hur~., lf.S. Ath'>rni,yw/~ncl.

Hnnorii1,J~ l flbn fL'.-'Bublllt" .Dtam1el1
T~enfie!h Gircfiit Qis'tti<;t Aitoroey cvien.cJ.
ITooorable .Rllell.il Wifsoa, 1.:!xeautive.Pir~tto,
MlS§Issii,pi Comniissioi1 ou .Tu<J,cia,l Pl!rf-0,'l1Jal"\!:e Wiand .

., .
-.,-

- - -- - - - - - - -
-----
 .,.
'[ii'
""
:i:
"c
._,"' !"
S
:i-'
"-1
r .
~
[f
1.., "1-
:i "'"',,.
"'
~
••
....
-..
"'-::
~
o;l
<'
:z

,.
E-Filed Document Nov 19 2020 14:06:10 2020-M-00995 Pages: 2

i\lJTSSfSSIPPl C'0Mn1TSSION ON JUI>JClAL PERF0Ri"1ANCB

MO Nonh s,.,,c, ~ofu, In,1
JiJ.tkrtM. r-,i1~;1~.,:pri wioi
Td~.J1li""" 1fil\ IJJ:W-1!.ri
f.tX (ftfll I y~_;..1;1
Cmtltl:muiHJ1JA;{!.t11..:1~r:tnli:~m

,September 4. 2020

Robinson. Abb.y 0 .
117 !!:, Pea1'1 Sl:f.\1t
J~ckson, ;,is .3Q20 l

.
Dear RobTuson. Al)hv G,: .
Tue Mississippi Cum.nilisio11_01~ J~gi~ial f ~riifrmance 11118 r.:c.-eived .yQur_camp!aiti!
c4tied September '1 2020. The cumplalm was filed. on September 4. -2020. and has beer.1
assigned Commis~inn F(le Number. 2020- 15.4. Vour eomplairu will he re\.-iewcl h) the
Ct1ruroH,$i9rtdutjng the O~t~ber 9,2020 m;~~liilg,

Under SectiotJ 177/>. o r the Mississ ippi Con,1ir.u1ion of_l~9U. :ill prl'lccedii,gs IJcfore
lb_<' Gom1'rlissi9i1 ,;~re· required t9 be confidential 1u1le~~ and until the Commis~i<in m;ikes a
reconimendation.to rhe Mississippi Supreme Cour1- the Comn1issicm will conlll1unicatewirh.
)·ou, thmllgb its ~aff, .a~ muy be m::c~ss~· l<'i llmh·er It~ inv~jgmion. Yml wfl1 be. advised
llf the; CQflllllis:, ien's fnw.t detetll1iwition. Tl\ou dce'm the Commission ncds m be awa«~-of
an.y ,ailiJitionaJ informatilm, please inclnd_o tire ~use nu ~ in al l i;:pmmunilfalions v.itlJ th~
Commission, ·

ff-you 11.:ivc any g~~tjt~11s p_lea.sc (i,ill up()n me 11r YO.llf converri_en~e.

Very tnily )'ours:

-Ra~icl L. Wil~on
Lxecutlve 6 irae1:tor
R W !CI
 ..--.~·'

MJSS1SSIP.Pl COT--:IJ\USSlON ON JUDfCIAL PERFOR..l\1.ANCE

. . 660 Nonh Srreet. SuiJo IIU
Jac"""'1. M'5si*'P.f" .\9'rol
Idc:plloae; (&II) 359-1 !73
f,.r. (601 135+-6ln
E!I..JI. Ol.llilbOX@judicial:pcrll)Mlllll~gQV

Ms, Ahoy G. Rob[ji.<on

22 '.TE. Pearl Street
Jacksqn, MS J9101

Dear-Robinson. Abby G.:

The Mississippi Colllll)is:sion .on Judicial .Performance.has received your complain!
dared No v ~ 5, 2019; The complaint was f.tled on November 5, 2019. and has been
ilssigneii CQmmission File Number, 2019-202. Yciur ·complaint will be -eeviewed ey the
Col.Dinission during the l)ecembcr 13,_20 L9 meeii_ng;

Under Sectlon 177A o f the Ml551~ppi Ci;)nsli,ttili(m·Qf 1890, all ~dings befu\'C
=
th.e {;plllllllS,i<>n requlred to be:confidential unless and llDtil thl' Commi!,Sion:mak~;t
rce.;ommen<latiMfo the Mis~l!P' Supielne.Court. The Commis.~011 will co.mmunicate with
you; lhrough ilS sraff, as may be tieCGS,W)' to itmher its investigation. Yciu. will be advised
of!he 9<>~on's final d;1erminati_on. lf you de«nd1e-COmmtssio.n needs to be aw-are-of
.any additibnal information., please i i , ~ I.be cilse ~ [lll)]'loer--ailsc· Jfui:ribcf in all
communicariens with :the c.,,mmission.
-
Very _tntly yow:s.

Darlene Ballam
Exec"utive Director

--
 -
-.
E-Filed Document case:· BlCOl:lB-cv-02329
Nov 19 2020 14:06:16 Oocurnenf*.
2020-M-00995
217 Pages: 13P~g'e l 9f 12
FlJed'. 07/06/2Q20

JN Tf-{E COUNTY COURT OF R..--\NKIN CO,UNTY. MISSlSSIPPI

f)ANll'L SI IOPf PLALNTIFF

v. CArJSl' NG. 6.1 COi: 18-cv-02321>

VR M!CHAFI. WINKEi.MANN IN l!fS

PROFF.SSIONAl AND ms PERSONAL
CAPACn'Y. Nl:W soirm
NEUROSPINE
- -D6fi::,_t,JJ)ANTS
·
·CLl1';1C AND10R THE fl<T!TIO!J~ 'NAlv!l:
OfNEW s0l.1i·11 NEtJ l{QS l)J}.:'E CUN!(
t)E \f1VANctO RX Pl+.A.·HMACY
,\t,.'D10R FICTTI101JS NAME !\'EW
SQ\JTI I NEl 1~0Sf>[NI:: !)IVIS.JQN Of
SPlt\AL)N·t
. b':l(V.ENTJON
.

ME-MORANDLIM OP1NION AND ORDE~

GQnsicleration, 1:i~CillJse uf'il!I p6ssil)k .:_ffe(;( on a!I !he other pe.niling molions hy bolh parties; :tht>

Cour.c tirs1 corr.!dcred tbe morion of!heTie.fcndw:it, Dr.. Mlch:ml WinkelDllinll, for ~ummary

jlJJ;lgmeilf IQo~ l nJ. 1'.hiire were two grounds for s1m1m:uy judgment pr:esemed in the mmion:

( f J Scmtu(c oflimitafions; cind (2) laelc. ofa,:ompetem medical ~xpert. Thc,cri~fendruu,.

.
. . ln Or, Winke'hnann'S:moti6n and filed lts own
NewSomh ~c:urosp1m: (herea:fter ··NS2"), joined

:m(!lioi, for ~tunmw:y. judgmenl [Poe, I ~I I raising thes:ime factual .and legal grQund:s. c;ciunse!

for e~ch party lJISC,<:d in mm. arrd- the court !lrlnQunccd.reooy (at d~lsio11 a.fret h;iying previously

revbvcd the:mo_(ions ru1d,tespqru..e, i:hi: r_d cvtm l 6ri~ s. th~ Cj~ ):}w pr~scnted, and: the

i!rgiimen~. of t<1uns;:.i (lncludfog ac mult~page e1'hlhit admitted insupp_ort l1f Defu~~,~· pPslt(Qn

the Defontlantj from the he_ncii (6r1he' rcasoni tneri·recite(I :md o!her oases·a Jdxessed herein.
 Cas a: 61co1;1a-.cv,d232.9 Giocument #; 217 Flied: 071015/2020 Page 2 of lZ

t)an:¢1 Shope aJlci_g~ Lha1 I)r Wink~!mai.m ncitl igently prescri bed l11 r11 •>pioids th:11

caused h-im t(1 ·be.;ome .addict~d and suffer·n inxciad of :Cons.eHuentes: Mi. Shope !iiic:ime a
patient of Or, Wink.elmnnn on j)ecem-her 12, 1995:, Mr, Shope had then recently undergHne ~k

surgery
:, ~
and was referred tu Dr. Winkelmann lur ,.,.,-Jluatioa Becallcse 1,1fMr. Shope's persistent
~

low back pnin. Or. \Vinkelmiuuueco.mmended a Gourse of opioi)l medication (Hydi'oceidorie) lo

enable Mr, ShoJ.lC to pa·r1tciP.11lc in phy~ical iheotp)'. Dr, Wink.el.mann first prescribe.cl Lorcet Plus
[l·lrdroeodonci to Mr ~hope on ,lllnl.!Jl!j· 4. IIJ96;

Dr, \Vjakclmurili '~w MJ:. ~hc'i¢. for 1\j)prox~ly one year from D.e<lember l 995
l•
Lhm~gh December 1996, During that Time; br. Winkelmann prescribed Lortiel.l)lus; iln<l o~r

27, I\198. Pr, Wirikelniana i;fia aQ.l ~ (Ir trc,)t Mr. Shope thereatter Jor -approxirnatc.Jy thirteen

y~arn from i)ecemocr 3. 1996. through OotobeT 12, .2009.

When Mr. Sb~pc remmcd (!11 ()c!(lper n, 2009, 1)1, Wink!'lmru)h noted that Mt. Shupe

bad bc;e11 \vot)dng a.s .a truck dri ver but c;ontinued to experience low hack JW!l. Dr. Wfn.kelniarm

recommended an MRl. 11hysic;aJ th-erapy,.filld presc.ti~cd Lorcet Pltis with instruotions Ii> mk.i one

every bf'< h_i.,ur~. Mr, ~h®:C was pr_r;:scrt&d l2fi pills; with one refill. Dr. Winkelmann wouJJ

contrnue to ~e ivir. SJ,ope- percfodieaJly in 2tll 0, 2011. JOI 2, und 20.13, Accoroing tt, lbe·relevruu
-medical recor,k in No1>ember of 2012, Mr. $hope ~ns swirched from Lorcet Plus to Nc'irc-0

10/525.:o. c;,mbinatlon.of·bydro~ugunc~nd ru:etmnlnQJ)hca ('I yl.:nol) for._pairt relief.

On January 22. 2013; Mr. Shw unde.niiib!y sipted ;; Ns.i P~in Management Pol icy.

Panrgrapb <J <ifthe Sf\Teef17<;n1 pr.ovided tha.t Dr. Wlrik_elrru;nn could stqp pr-,scribinicr...nny or aU
. --
m.edi~'lllidns if Mr. Siil;>p?, ~ ··any HlegaJ :,ubstimce." 1n paragraph. 1I. Mr. Shop~ Qgreed m
2.
 case: &1Go1:18-cV·02329 Documerit it: 2-17 Fife.<f; 07/06/202.0 P.age 3 of 12

subriiit t!) hltm.d 6r urine testing. Finttlly. Mr, Sri'ope ilgreed in wT.iti11& that he undersrnod 1ha1

Mr. Shope was· evaluated by Dr. Winkelmann on Octo~ 23, 2013, -and lllldei'went !cl

urine ifru~~rcen. The :1crcc11 wa< negl!,tive for opiat~s. At the nexr c:valuation-oli February 12.

•
2fil4, Dr. WinkctmllI111 no1eo that tb~ October drug scrreen did ll!l1 show lhe medi&tim1 in his.
-· ~ • • •• + •

s~;stem, .'\$ a resuft. Dt. \l..'inkelmann reduced the number of Norco tablets frem nmety to s-lx~·

/\1 the next e.valuaimn on /\•lay 13, WI 4, Mr Shope underwem another urine,d:rµA .,cree·n.

Qr. W(nk~_lmann :saw Mr. Sh9~ fn 111~ 1nruning amt diciar~~ lili ~flke note at ·9:tM /\J\.L

1'eudrng-the res\ll~ M tlie wine :drµg ~creen, Dr. \\imk,elmann -kept the do~e of'Norco I0D25

the same (6D tablets') "'hh instructions 10 1,rk¢ on~ hy mouth every eight hours. Dr. ·wi11kelmann

als~ 1>fe'scrlbei:I 1wn rnfHk The uriri~ ..umple raken that day was net tested until after 11\e visit

alt4:34-(2:34 P.M) m, Ma)• D . iOl4. Mr: Shope tested pnsitiv,dbr eannabinoid (marijuana).

On ~·1,a)' 16, 2914, .Dr. Wlnk_elm,ann prepare!! a letter to Mi Shope~stafocl:

l i1nd. ,1 ne_c eS'~· w infonn ym; 41i11 I wUl no longer be .ilble t{) ~rve as your doc\or.
A~ yo~ know u,:e of · Ul~gal .Su~~tai,ce with • ~l mweatitln is irl nun
e_omp!inm,c: wi.rh o,,rpai.rnrran4gemC111 !)<Ille~. I feel your ne~~:would hest ~ .served
by llil nddictionologis.t who i;ro, ;is~rsl Y<l\l In It sub$t/!nce- abu..~ ptognun. At 1his
rolm•. a -continued patient/ ph:,,:sicinn relatioosb1p would: be inappropriate; If you
\\•o~ld li ke ·s ref'e rml 10 an eddic1.io11oli'lg.1st i,lea<ie comaci our office Oild we will be
happy. tii 1,;,s'mt yi'lu.

I recommend yc,u prom·ptly find a.nother phy~ician who c;,m [>es! i;a;e for your
~i:lntinu~d:mesJical ne~s. Yo,1 niay c.6mlkl 1hc Pinc.- Grove ~iety @'601-.85'3--050:1
or Brnlg~ Ir @ till l-?77-9353 for §Ulis_tanci .abil$e l're'-iit!D¢nl. Any delay <;(ll!fd
jeepacdrzc your beallh.-so plea,e acr promptly.
I will remam ,wailable- t() provido medical 1,eam1ent to you., (nl JUI tme~enty b1t~ls
·onl~.. on:i i Ma> ll, 2.01.4 while: yqu nave .an opportuni1y to arrang~ -for. .ano.tbe1'
ph)'Rici!lli. Once yo~ ha\/'c found ru,otl1"r physldan and w,necdve an ,approprlare

)
 Gase; 61G01:1B,.cv-02329 Document#: 217 Flied: 07/00/4Q20 Page 4 o'f 12

<1titl1ori:zario11. I wtll alsn oe lt~ppy 10 .tliscuss your case wilh the. rliy~itian a,~wning
,·our ,'life 1·.m,loscu. ple'1se rTrn'I /f C<)p\ tlf a rtt~dicai rcc,mf, r~l~~e :illlhoffza1J011
a.~
lorm inr yeu m =pl1:.t;:?Dfl re1um l!' ;,ynfficc..,. socin pusi.'11>!e.

\Vni)e it lf unfoli:unnt~ that our reL:iti,mship ha\ reached this srage, I will nor ~ ·llbk-
10 previ<le medii:aLcar.: ofany ki1Jd:w you 11f1er Mlly 31, 20J4,

Dr. Winkelnmnndid not see or tre:u Mr. S.hgix in WlY manner aft~ May· 13, 2014.

Mr. Sbope li lied lire pr~scnpti,)11 <No, 45 197 13) for _sixty (61)) Norco I P/325· tttbleis--a1

Kiogcr P~am)llt)' orr May 1-3• .i'Ol4. 0n June 4. .20!4, Mr. Shope, filled the·~ o·f 1wo refill~

(pre.scllJ!l ion No 45-J9713) for s ~xt~ ((iOJ Nun;o 10/325 IA_blcJs·acKroger Phannacy. 0-n June 21,

20H. Mr. ·Shllp,:, plliii:uly fill~ lhe.se<:1111J of Lwo refif[s (~scription:No, -151Q713) l11r twenty;,

-six 126) No,-.o 101325 mbleisA1t Kroger Pharmacy. On June 27. 2014, Mr. Shope partiillly fill,;d

the-se.oond l1f IWl'l t.efill~ (])n!'scnption No. 451971-3.J far ,wenty-s:ix (26) Norto I O/'l-25. tahlcts at

Krog~r Phanm1cy, On Jufy .&, 2014, Mr. Shope p~rclall) tilled !be second of 1\1~, refill~

lpres,dplion. No, 45 i 97 f'31 forciaht <~) Norco 1Ot3J.S 1ul,lei.s ai !<roger Phill111ac y.

Mt. Sh-,.,f>l!- file_d hi.s first'compla,m (Co.u5e No. I ll-41>0) .o n M@.rch 15. 2 0 I 8. (E.,. F.). The ·

s.uit wr,s diS1JUss.:d. wi-lhow prejudice ,m August :8. 20 t 8. The present '3Ction WS.'l fl.I~ on

November 20, 20lR,

STATUTE or LIMITATIONS
MediC'~l malpri1cti.ce claims are governed b)' fl iv.·o-year-statute of!iniitations. "[Nlo .3
I
claim hi ton; nia_y be f>roug.111 :lb<alnsi a !Jccns.:d phys!cilln •, . (6r in.iurns orwrongf.ul tk'adt

.insm1um1 of the comse of medical. .~nrgiell! ~r ~lh_erl)rofessionaL>iervicei, unl.~ il is fil.ei

·,,.i-1hin tw(1 (ii y~.u:,·ftom the ttiLe of (be Iii.leg~~ Omi!ISion or11~gleg_shall or v.1th rea~)nable

rlillg,nt~ ini~tirave ~en first lmuw11cir ffiscovered ... '' M;;;s, CODE ANN. § I 5'-L-38 (Rev.

200JJ. ln this ca;e. Mr. Shopc->1!leges lhat 0 L Winke!mano: was ne~tlgel\l irrpres~ribing nj'li()id

4
 case: 61C01:18-cv-02329 Document#' 217 Flied; 07/06/2020 Pa_ge 5 ot 12

rnedicahon 1ha1 eaused him to become'addit1ed, The only hope·heceould possible entertain foT

~voiding th~ pla·in ll!nglllli(e ,,f1frnt s1a1ute whe11 i1J1Plied IP the tncts he~in is 1hat1here was

scim_eltung t,.u_enl.1l_J,ou1 };tis ac14iction !Ml $.olni=ho.w was concealeil Hr eouldno1 have ..been

-tlis;.,-owred by tne exercise nf re(IS()nabi~ tliilgence on Plaintiff's pan. The Court finds !here is

3bs~Jutely mllhin~ latent (,lJ' cpnceal1;ih11;>.ou1 nr.Winkelmann ·s~atment and-prescrip1ions

\~Tiuen as pan or llis.ircalment ()fthis•Plaint.i.IT: Mt, Shope was·clearly aware of these

presc11P.rlllns-.1md \\1he11 tt,ey were wri!tcl1and fll lcd 8$ evidenaed by tlfe p,)larmacy reconts tlu!t

dcmonS!ral~ thi,t Mr. Shope ltlmself fil led. the,¢ pres,;:rlptions.

A.<o(O the Jiiedic,d d ini¢, NS_:! tloes not pr~crlpe drug.~orwritc.j)r~crip1frins. further,

there fs.absolu!ely nQproof.tha1 the clinic had,a:ny responslblllry to control the doetor/patiecm

rdationsh1p w11 h reg~· lo prc$Crlption re.g.,,lation,ior th111 it-,SOITl('tµ)w·failei:l ln thllt

·'supervisory" rc!;J)on$ihilT1y if It ever txist~_d, ln llitt 0

lffc Court finds thlll the furegping

d~crlpiion o! 1ho1t!!fCCmem letter.herwem, fvtr. Shope and N'S2 a• 10 thdt Pfrin Mltnagemenl

l'olicy Ct>\Jld ll<ll pe detl~f or m~\fC lU18inbili\U!.>;US wl_

fu_rev.rJ IQ J.hej_r re}atiOn.'lfilp with fu[s.

Plaintifi'. Hl~ elni111J1 that NSl Som<!how t'niled to m.orif1or.or 11/llfll Mr. Sho~ is simply 1nade up

.,Jln of whole clo1h; it is a sham claim with no bJlSI;; 1n an.y iact lltus far J>~te.d 10 \he Coun

The 11vo-yeur·S01, i,erio,l'run~ from the a.ire ,Jrt1,~"«JJ~ed :it;t. mnissfanor ""1$lecV'

llierc i~ nti i:;;uc or marerial Ja&t, ge1m111e or dhmge.nuuu,., that the l=umc: Dr: Winkelmann

CGmmrrted lfll} ac-1 wlrat<~\·crtvwards ;vii . Shc,pe wa~ ()n l\,.U.y 13:, 2014, !he dme'(lf lhdli.'"

office visl! with J?r. Winkelmarin ai1d.NewS0.uth. Irie S!Ul W!tS firsl (impropcdy) fi:led filll1(>Sl

four years. !ater on Marcil 15, 3{) I $., and tho: vers[oo .curremJy before thls ·oour~ ·' "~ not properly

file<l UD!il Au1;11ll1, JOI 8, fhe.re i~ no hlllliS:in fat! 11, l)clicvc tMI Mr, S.hPP.'e ilid not ku!)w cjXllClly
 case: 61C01:1S-cv-Oi2329 Document #: 217 F!l~d: 07/06/2020 P11.g~ ~ of 12

Mr. Shope·also .u:~ues rhat.Dr. Winkel mann wai; negtigen1 in failing to carre,el 1be

prec5-n_pl10Ji retifu writr,fn llt che lll!., nlrice vjsu. Even M>. ltt< la,t ofthest: pres<!ripnons Wc.,Te

Oller! by Mr. Shu])<! in July of 2014. ThUli. My alle~ed negligence_ ass,;i;;iared with this sup~scd

cnnissivrr l,)t'i:IJJ'Ti!d wel l l)etme two y¢ars prior to llie filing_ ofrh1s lawsuit.

! he Cnurtfintls that tlie l1Jaintill'11 daims against Dr, Winkelmann and NS2.are plan:tly.

barre!'! by the two-year ~tamt~ flflimitiitiotis. [f II Statute of Llmitation_s Is !O serve itS ·s.t.atutory

PlIIF°'Se in this.c£1Se-, tlic.Dcfendant5 lite eutitleJ to a Judgment a-s B:IIllltter of law.and th~ c-ase
..
ouRhrtin~JI~
": :
m he d,smiss:ed w,LI, prejudice.
~

MEI:>TCAL EXPERT

la cu,es invtJJv.ing c.laims of medical 1m1lprncnce, Mlssis_sippi courts··have·consu_tently

held th,1t n plaintilfrm1s.1 prQve t11e·foJlowitig eleme:tus ir. order tQ s,;,i.:t;ee4: "I I) a;duti existed.

requiring ftie d_ef.!ndnnl 19 confonn to·a, Rpeciti!!-standard-.of conduct for the_ptotecliQn of others'

against unrt'llAflnahlerisk orinjury; (2) a tailurc to c<:>nform ca !he tequl~d ~andarrl ~ccu.rred;

nnd (SJ ~uch a ui'each qf clu!J. by rhc defendant l)roxi111a1ely ca1~d IUl Injury t() the plalnufT.' '

Mt1s,. ilap:lst Med Cir" im: v. PJ,elps. "l,4. ~o.3d "843. 845 (Miss. ~O I~) (citing Crou hwaft v. S,

IJ~ lth ('r,rp ,>( Rm,smn, Inc.• 94 ~(l.3d I 070, 1()73 (Miss. 20.12}). ~E1tpa1 ti:stimonr is essential

in mcdic-<1! m:ilµra~tice e4~c:s.' bccau~Jhe-expen te,,'Ulllony damonstmtll!:-how Ebe:requiJ:ed

,;.rnr.dru-d ol' c3J1>·.wi.s tHsr~garded,

- aJ:1d
. the 1estimonv-certilic.$ lblll the deforu'lant's--fuillll'C
~ .- . . the
1\lic; .

pr(l-,;im$ cuu~e. onrroxim!lle contr[buLlil_g.~,uJse'' of tlw il1iury."' J,J. iu.845 (quoting Vr.cJ:.rburs

H~allhi:are, LLC 1•. Dell$. fS2 So·. 3d 1171. l l 74 (Miss, 201 4)1, To-e-stahlish all three demenn=,
the expert's 1cs11m,m)' must ·'ldemhy ,artd {lrticuh\lc the requishc:s1anrlard. that wns' 1ml C•>mplied

\vtth, fimdl Lhc e~pel'I must ;ilso e_stai,li~hrhn1 [h¢ !ailur-fwas lb.e":prcixim!ite cause. cir pni'(imn1c

6
 Ca~: olC0.1:.18-ev-0~329 D0c1.1met'll #; 2,17 Filed: 07/06/2020 Pa.ge 7 of 12.

.,, C-!l!!&e, of tile allege,d injuries.''J!uhbard "· Wansley. 954 So.2d 95 1, 957 (Miss,
comributin!l ~ ~

10071 (411111 i11g llanwr 1 {,i(lt11t.i11. (,05 ~11./~ RO.S, /lO'l IMi~~. 19<'12) l,

As.a:n alremaie basil< for summary judgment, the·.Defondants Mgued thll! th.el'lainliffdid

no.1hnve,a qua!rfit.-d medical ellpcrt !O support his.c!aim. Eiled c.ontemporaneously 1sith the

n,otiQn lnr M1m1J1Jil'y jud$iJ1C}ll w~ a.mmiun w Ntrike: the Plaintiff, expcn, Rena Beal. [Du<:.

17.5). The iaal .:ollfLhas li ~ate·keepmfil responsibilily 10 ,i.ssurc-a proposed expert '~ opinion hify~

··relilih}e Msis-in rhe knu11'.)cdgc rmd exp¢rience ofrhe re!ev.an1.t:lfsciP.line-." F/pp,· , •• Greenw<,11!l

l.!;1nr~.lfo.rp.; 231 So, :lcl 194. 19~ ('f!lotlng 1.· umh() Tit·,:, Co.."· (,'armichael; 526 IJ.S. l;l7. 158

( I999)J. MissfasJppi Rule oJ'E videnoe 702 -prQVide.LJbttt a witn:.;ss way testify~ an e,'<f)irt i ffhe

wlme.ss,b "4uil1fie_d~iln eitpcrl by knowl~i:!ge, s!,.ill, .:)'-penence, trainfug. or:cducationt , nnd if

they meei ihe following Cflteria;

(.i) rhe cxpcn·s sc1ernilk ttd \nit#I, t1rc11h.erspccial ized knowledge will hi:IP. the' trier

,, (' l':ict· io undersrmtd 1hc,evl.<J.ence 1>r to dc!c..rmln~ afi,cl in i~sue,

(!>l the 1~51.u'i\ony 1.s b.a);ed on sufficl.cnt lrul!s or daia:

(t) rile 1esdmony islhe ~rO:duct nfrellllble princlples.tind n1ethorls; i!nd-

Jdentit'.yil\g th~ Si4nd~d of c~rc gy,,ed l\,Y ~ defemll!nt physician is ·essentilll in medical

m.alp(SCtiCe i.:hums, be~.us~ without ·-SOlJlC identification: of the 'S!rul'daid of care, au ex~n'$

testimony dnc., 1101 satisty the two,pr,m~~ te_St und.er Dpuberi; '·(J) whetner !he expert opinion

fa, n:lewmt ln tliiH ir must ·as~h.1 1h( irrct bf fact' :md (2) whether the proffered opini_~ll 1$
rehable .. k/r11de1 1· Rlwdes. :5-2 So. 3<l 430, 44.'i (Miss: Ct·. App. 20 ! I) (quoting Miss Transp

7
 case. e1co1:1S cv-o20290
Doc1)mem #; 217 Filett 07/Q6/2020 P/ige 8 cif 12

natlon;il sU1ndard of-c.ai:e.' ' falilre- of .vo,.Jirop 1•. Hmu,. •> So. Jd }81. .384 (Mis~. 20Q9). H'fhc.

.sJam!nrd a111cu.!ated mus1 tit 11hie~1ii·e. ~11i su~i~cti1·c..·· Id St/e Hn// 1• H1lh1m. 4oti So. ·1;:l J:C5/, ,

871 (Miss. 1985 1. ll rs nm enough for a.m_cdical expen to ~l!Ue whm be or shc. would do, as thi~

would~ a sub}ecrive opinion. S~ Mar1wl/ \'.: Buprist M~m'I Hosp.-Desolo, lnc., 9,5g So. ,2d
2$4. 2S9 {.'vlis~. Ct. A-pp. 1007).

:~cs, there I~ · no requircrneot tbat"'11 expert in>'l medical-malpractice case be a-spechilist in tlir.
s&mc :,rca as 1ha doou:ir -ubout -wlmm the expert is 1esti_fymg u1 ":.£au! W lhc _s((U1da!d l;!fcare. "
M,•DtJm'i1:I v i'idikiti. -39 Sp, 3d 952. -956 (Miss, <;t. 0'\p_p, 2009). li(lw·ever. '"[sJ~tisfac.tol')'

fmniliiuiry \\ ith thecsp.c6:ilt y vf tlieJefondant d.o,;tor is . , . required m order 1'.'or an expe_rt tll
testify as,to tru: standurd. of care 0weJ 10.1he-p:lainutl' padei:it," r ij)ps at !_9'7 (Miss, Ci.•.I.pp,

.2.01 8) (quQtint Huhimrri v, Wan.t&y, 9f4 S.(). 2i195l. ?57 lMi$~ :!007J)_tv(1.5sissipp1 Couns

have ~un~ist~[ly.held
. - - with-the standard o(i;are
-that "some famlnari1v" . is. rl01
. . sufficient
.. roTerider
. .

,smndard or care-.opinioru:admissJble;. ruther. ''[t]lte rule~ _Lhllrthc; expen must ex=.i.se the same

le,'el of int~)ki:tutil rigor !Ii~\ cbaiacterfze.~ the pr&clke of an expert in the rele'l-'ant field." Poole

e;r. ref f'riol~. ,, .1 w1r1r. 908 So. 2d 71o. 724( Mlss, 2005 ).

I\, Quallfiea~ioru

Rei,~ Dt\ll ~ ~ family rn.ir;epr-auhioncrr. Dr.. Winkelmann. is·A,pby,iairi,51, or physical

mediciae-docmr, Whi le,a nursc:practlti(,n~r may f)(!Ssess ~ nil: m<:<lical experfeDcecmtd a:broad

sldll ·,er;-tlle) are ncv;nl1ele$~ UD.Qualtils:d \9 rifftr pby,lcian.-srandm-d-of-c,are-,es:rltnnny lilisen t

.eviden·c~ ot"~J'C~.1.tlizeil knowledge" regard.ing.1.he'applkahlemarid!ll'd M care I() 1hcspcci.1.1h) in

quc,stlon and with regard to the·spec i1ic care a11J tream1ent a1 Issue. See .%~Q,~ld-r. <.ig@dwin,

740 Sn 2.d ~54, 856:S/ /Miss, 1999) l3ffirniing !Tiu! ·~o.url's grani ui' motion to strike affithv11 .or

8
 Case.: 61Cdl:18,cv-02329 Document#· 217 Fil1=d: 07/06/7,9'2,Q P~ge 9 of 12

nutk prac1i11oner wh0 failed co demonstrate 1_ha1 sh~ possessed spccializeo l(nowle(ige're.gll.Tding

5pc~ult) . , onduJon. and lri.lam1c111 :11 is~.11d

Th\: PlaiTlli:ff submlned an ·a'tnda\•it fr6!l1 Ms. rkal .tbJu intlu#ed her. curriculum vitae.

Beal offers no facrs or professlonaJ e.xp,:rum.:e tluu would c!~'ITlflrf.<;trli"tc ~ :Spc:cialfaei:i

kn.owlcc:Jge--0ri:Wi:t a silti~factory famlltanry-regard[ng: ,vim!~ physiatrlS! in a··olinicru setting_

should·or should not have done· in cval~tiug and rrearing the.Plainiiff for ai:i OPi.¢id dependcricy

111e<lical. s1rrglcaJ. ~i;ne health, ll'ianag~men1, quaUcy maruigemcnt, women's

h~1i1, 1~!ilatrie,.ana rwc lve (12) years-ofe,xpcrl~e 115:Family Nurse l1 ractitioner
prlmt1ry c11Tc, cornfied.disabilft.y examiner, hoi;pital and outpatlenrclJ:ni¢ .satring
pro,iding quff!ity, cost efTc:ctivc. cgmprehensi,~ h~th c.ar.: ·.IIS8eSmlents,
diag111j~is, treatment, ,,valUuticm, illld In-depth knowledga, experience of
m.;ru1g_cm.e.n1 and leadership st~·les. · J

~llill'inglf aJ_1 d li1IiiJly la~Kingfr_om f,~al.'s CV i.~ nn indicadon of aoy e d ~_O!l. tniinJng,

ceni:lfuaiions. or other oxperi-ence Ill the are!! of phy,1u1Ty, P.filll rniinag~ment, or ~ddictlonology
that would re11c1t:r her ~c;,rripe/enr .l(l te:stify 11, tt:(matle~ ~c!111.hlg to those .suhjcecs.
forther, lncre ls nn. eyidencc ilrn1 !:foal has ever J)n!C-tite,d ii; .a c~llllliorativ~ r~lnli()lish1p

with- a physbtris1. atldictlruwlngi;t, or Jialn tlUIJlJ!ils:m.ell! -physicillll. in the treatm~nt <>r opieid
dere.ndc:nl patiems.<)r otherwise.. S~? Due. #14- l \llnlt rcspe.ct to cl)llabQratlon, M'i!,,;u;$1ppi htw

requires:

~ jid\!lU!C~d practfc.e. rt;giS)ere(i nurse: 8h1111 pe.rfilrm those furtotiOlis amhoruea m

thh ~ec!fon witbi'n a collaborativelconsult,nlve I 'ftmruu with II cftn1fs1 or
phy~ician wilh.lin unrestrictedltcense to Pi:BClkc. tlenti,,"'U)' QT 1)\edfoine thiSc statein
a n t! witbin an ~IJI bllshed p rilfi>eol Or 1;1n11,tlee g? p%~ ~ ·,ipprQpn\!te, that is
filed with !he ll(lllt.d llJXII] 1.rc,cn·51: I1ppli9),.tioll, license m,ewaL after entenn_g lnte a
nlm t0Haix1~ti\'<:! consplralivc refationship ot making :changes-to the J)l'Oll;lcs l or
ftr<1f t~ guideline~ or prl\i:tice -site. The: board shall re11lew a.nii apP!<JVC the protoci;il
h ,1 om,ur.: i:(lmphance. wi th aprxlicahlc rc_gulsrory t11an_dards; The sdvall!le_d ptac~
registercc1 nmse may not prattice ·US 'lin APRN if1 there i~ 11e,
 cas~e: B1C01:-18-c;v-02.3l29 Document #~ 217 Rle!:l' 07/0.6/'l!)20 Page 10 of 1?

Ctllllll,,,ratil'eicc;insµll.lltivt re!ntionslilp witb o ·phys!dan- & tjei1titr .ind .i. hoarrf.

3PJm1Vcd prntocol or pr<1e11r,e mudcllnes. ·

Miss, CODE 1\NX ~ 73. 15:20 (Re·,, 2010) (cmpha.)-i~ adii~aJ. lle\11 J!C(jlllfed 8 Certifrcat1(ln as a

family nurse pr.icti1iom:r (FNP-BC) in 2006. Since Um! lime, Beal ba:s worked JI the G:V. Sonny

M.on!gomel'} Y~ Medkiil (.:enter. She fias work.?:d in tl\e Primary Care Clinic (2~-201 1), and

~ o ccit1ficd ~-ompe;:sation and Pl<~on dis:abiliJy examiner. Without the requisite.experlenc~,

fralning. onpccitiHz,;dJuowle.dg~, lleal l~c.ks !he oompeiency 10 opine onth~ staj,d.ml of Clll'.e

owed 1-0 elamtiff t,y L">r. \Vlnkoimann ·and ns lo wlJe!her Dr. Wfnkelm!lDJl \'iolated saJd standard
11! SllY w~y during tii., rreMmcm ot:Pi~1m1fi

a_. A_rtku t~.rfon of Objc~llv.e Standa rd of Cart .for;, Physiatri.~.f

lkal 's nffidavl! also lacks i!i1 c:ssenffa1 ele:i,ent. tb~ ohjeer!ve ,stand'U'd of care. In the

1!ffimivit. ~al doei l!Ql cfte any st.)nd!lrd of care wharsoever. and she ctnainly neV!!f nrticulare.sc

ho\f ~r, WinkeJrnaru:; 's creatmem of the Plaimi~ Yrolatc;d the .tandard of c<1re. Beol ::strue_s- ;

·c oncJusJ.on 1h·at ti)~ ~1am:fl!id of can, "'a" ··orolc'cn" w1choui idcnttfying tlii: .sl:i1ndfml or ~,ro. and

how it wa~ tif91ched.

Aftcr,;urtl1_1A ~r cnndusiQn ihM "thl; app.lk:able stnndlmj of cilr_e was l)roken," Beal
•
providl!s her .nn.aly~i~ =11y ·nm feJerencinii rhe letter lbal Dr. Wink,•lrosnu senr ro Mr. Shope

temiiri;it1ng the phys1cl-an-jlllt1e.ut rellnlonshlp. B.ea1 fQUI!a It ·1r-0ublesomc·• that D.r. Willkthruum

sald that he would tim be able_ to provide ony rnedic-al trea1ment to ~- ~ho~ after Ma~ 31 ,

2() 14, ai'n;i 1hcu pro..:~eds lo eo:oneouScly exp_liun how Pr. Win~elmann· continued to write

It appi;ar~that rhe solemn oa.th by bis slgnamrc on Exhihi1 C' fihc 5, l 6-i Ol-4 le{ter of
tc:onfnaiionJ. Dr, WlnkeJmann was. not truthl\JI h1 ~]l8{ien! docmr relationslnp to
.tlii,s Oploig ai!Qi.cl. Mr-, Shope when he_~ol only wcat beyond May Jl , 2014 in
prcsc.ribmg, iJ1e addktive Opic,,id, Ryd.roeo&;me, bul. also. th;re we no remrds in Mr.

10
 case: 6fCbl :18-cv-02329 Document#; 2i7 Flied: 07/0ey(.2020 P>-qge' 11.of.12

Shopc's-medicul file to support iiiviog the prescription of 120 pillt o_fr{ydiocixfone

whh-rn :i-+Liil~IJ. to ,II) Opioid i:lepend61cy tid_dic1 espci:ially t1lierthc·docror has noted
wkh,n hJ~ .lt!uer to ln~ p:illenL Mt, Shbpt that Hydmcotlone ,is ,a conu:ol fsk-J
suh:,t:mce und-lhat Mr, Shope ne~tfod assts1ru1cc from w, atl<lietionolugisr. The (allure
to· ab,de b) t!l!s wmre11 prOlU.l>t' und ,,hile knowing Ihm Mr. Shope· tt~o.!J~
~lih,tnni:e ,tl,>use OP.iOfd hel!'I, a,, well 11!1 :mning ro Mr Sha~ thlit it would be
"illapprQpriate,., to c.o·n1iriut ;i imtiimtlphyrlrian 1e.latlo11s/1ip. is, in-inrprofessimial
and pei:,;unal upmron. by itself-~ tlii-hu-e In the stal!datd of taro fl) 11. P.Jltient, t!lllllely,
Mr. Shope.

(Doc. 30, !U 3. ternphLisiidri ori_gii1al)J Ai !lie:cncl ufthis.qu("itc, He,al:i!lso candidly admits tha1

·she is .gi\ling_. her prnfe,;.~i=I

.
and "pez:,onal" op_rniot}. In other words, Beal
. ha:i providcJ R

s ubje_et,v(~t~ndarii,~fc,are and hHsiiiiled to artkul.at~ the 1~hjecti:ve ·,mudard-,1f caN that would

lie -npphcabfe 10 a phys!atdst,such as..Dr. Wmke!mann.

-t
e. 111otiori to Strike Secol)d Afif,;l,h·ii ()( n~11.1 Beal
,\fler the motion to-strike wa:;,.Ji lcd. thc:Plainrit"f suhmitied a:n•additl~naJ affidavit from •
Ms. B-e-al on Oe~ember 18, 2.019, sci~ fnrtl1 ,addltiptial expert apirupn~, !Doc. 1$7 J. 'rhe-<;oun
en"ie_red a 1,9he:dulmg ord.rr un July 1-.3,-2019 that es1J)hl1shed a ueadline or'Septcrnber I, 20 t 9, for

the PlaintiJf to -clesignate- Ow QpinltillS of :;n~· experts: The De(endllnt~_Jl led: ii motFun to itdk,c

Beal's second llffidavi1. [Poe. 19;•]. Th~ Coui:i fTnd., rhat lhe.ildditi<inal ~ignation ol expen-
opiltlons wa, untln1ely ~nd ec~urred llitc~ th(: discovery·deadline (Na,,ember 2.7. 20 19).

.AocorJfn_gly, rhe t>cfondants rnotiot\ to.strik1,.Bear:s al'llditvi~,} i:J.__grante<J. ' The b.'\Ses-art, i11rer

allu, I )-.ioJiiii<m of llii'.l s.chcdlll.mg nr(!crww, the late oµinfon disclosure whkh was an obvious

rcspo~ \ti JJeJ~ndJ!nl' ~ prt"viOttS ·re(jut~1.< IC• S<Pike; 2Jtnadcquate qnaJmcations p.lllSuanl !_O
1
Mf/CJ' ~u.•. .l) tallure m state ·an vbjeeti ve smnd!!rd of-cate: 4)failure to ~tale how-1111 objeetl.ve.

' On~ of ti\( mun- ~!sturl>ing th-in~ ib.oot the;''<\<1""1'-~ clotm l<l kno,y.3ometltlng·:abo.u1 mcdieal ·need! on!rug
abli-"'•l illWlt>!aimtnl •h<N~f wlf1ch-q_unlffie\.Jit1 t<I '!Ptn~Jl)oul l)ie De.londanui.n/J h!'l w.e,:is htt..cl,im tllar h<t'
woik at tit¢ VA ht)~'.pii.sl brn~gtu lier:imo ~ontJY.?1 WOh -m~y palielit:! w1t'h ~rai...nbw;_c; f~~~ f'.,ln1 1h1't $ht' h!l!.. trc;"tcd
ihe;n naF bc~nm a,,y ~ni \.llt«dvc,t,elabQn..c.hip with a me.d1cel <ioc1or whtl h31i done: s-0. ,he tia.5 iU!! '71\tl«lCVcd rhe.m l,1
1 ci1lnc 1dan1-'I m~.nncr wh1le sht-&d 9th~r 1-hings; Web a prOJ:1Q1ltion, th.at r..b~arion makes anexpen 111
prcr,iriciciovs <'n h.sJ~Ce.
Il
 Case; 6.ltb1 ·1B-cv,C'l2-32S ·oocumen1 #: 2i t Filed. 07/06/2020 Pa_ge 12 ef 1;

staml!Jrd was'v10Tated by Defendant(s): and 5)how tha1 fai lure had any Cl!USul conn_cctlon 10 th e

Witlmvt an ~eceptsb"le medical i:~rt, tlf~ Plalntifl's:t:aUSe of action niusi mil, Miss.

Bap1w Mt'//. Cir.. Inc. 1•. l'h!!lps, '.15,1 So,Jd :&4j, 845 lMi$. 20! 8). [n 1)Je ey~ill mis dcil;ision i.~

found ll(>t lt.1 ht disp<)si{ive for the olhtr r<!l!]iOUS BSS.,rted r e ~ the Statute of Limi#~tions,

ihi~ l1!Uet findmg will clso ~lllt In dismisMI with P.teJu~. the lim e ha,ing long past 10 re•t•pen

this li1igition ,mcc. di.$.miss,;<l evc:p if;;nch dismissal w~,:e ,nade w1tbour p~judioe. •

CONCLU::ilbN

tlaseti upon fliiscarrfil~--s'l!. and Illllll)' (!lli!!f tJctrrpQrted 'factu~J issue~ not discusse<l Jn this.

'
opinw.n but 1L,1iertetl wthe 'Plaintiffs t·oJummous record. not one'Ofwhi-o.b the Collrl'fllld_s to lJ;C!

"g~nuine" on ih·e legal issues wb.i.ch ~erve ~ .~ie hnsi, for thi,.Opinloll. tlie C(TllJ1.find.~ that ihcre

is no gE11uine muc of mererii'!l fac:1. and theJ}clendants·ar..- emitted io a judgment as ~ tei of

la,v. Tf1e nercnt1,;n1s· motion forsi1annary judgrnen~-anrl ID Slriki;:P!Aintlff's e;.-pm is gninted

amt iliis ai:li_on ~ disni.is!lep with ~rJ!judi~~'. Other-111aners In ihc file.pending hearin~ that were

pJVperly noti,eJ J'ur June :n. wio: t1rc.no1·rnled upon due to what thi(teoui:t C-OliSl(Jirs to :be the
diWQSitive ruttU)~ ouhe finding§ arid toildus.ion.~ h¢re"1) an.d!he f inal Jud_gment issued herewith:
•
Far the s11irre rias_on. imv other ~ndin,i- maners which weo,.D!Jt noticed Jor .tfti~ h.~rlng ,lute'JU"e·

now dis.nhs.~cd -as rno(H,

12
 case, !i1CO.L:18,tv-D232£l Oocume1111L. 218 r;ned: 07/0612020 Page 1. oi l

IN T:HF. ~oeNTY COIJRT OF R.•\.NKJ'< C'Ol lNTY. M JSSJ.SSIP}'l

I -·

:::,] PLAI NTrFF

l)AND'. L SH()PE I\ JUL O6 2020 =-~·
I ., CAUSE NO, 18-2}29
vs. ···• 1
. Iu~jk _ .. ~~ .-:_,_
DR.~UCl!AtL WINKELMANN lN HTS DEFENDaNTS
J'°ROff.SSIONAl,, AN D .JIIS l'ERSONAL CAl'ACJl'V,
NEW SOUTH NEllROSPINE ,C'I.INlC OF ,\DVANCED
Rx PHA.R l\'lACY uud/or FICTJTTOLiS NAME NEW
SOUTH NEITROSPIN.£ UfVJSJON o ·F SP.JNAL
INTEl{VENTION

C\>n~i~\<rrl with the findi~ 1m ~ rnnclusiotis m 1hc 11,kmorandum Opinion nnd ,,rder of

ev~n da_!e oer.:wtth. 1his· i:.ot111 hereby·en1e,s this Ffolll Ju,l~t'n~11ur.,u_ant to MRCP 5-1, ut (ii.vor

()fall ,111d~~ch ur1he t),ef~m;lam,- heroin, Cost.!i ~h~II ti¢ mxed to tbe Plauiti!I

Thkrhc 610 ooy 1Ji' July. 10W.

t<~m~~
Kt<nt McDanle1 ~
$-i,nlor Coumy Judg~
E-Filed Document Case-3·:20-cv,00418--DPJ-FKB
Nov 19 2020 14:06:22 Documen t 19 Flied 09103/20
2020-M-00995 Pages:Page
7 1 -of 7

IN THE UNrrED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF

THE SOUTl:IERL~DISTlUCT OF l\lUS~:SIPPl
NORTHERN DIVISION . .

BE'lTY ~ CJRlWAN PLAINTIFFS

ALFflE D NORMAN

VS. Cf VTLACTION NOtJ :20-t'V-418-1>).>j.f'KB

GET<::0 rNSUllA.NC:E, DEFF.-NDANTS

GF:0:RGE' .S PLACE , JNQ
a.utl JOHN DOE
.'
; .;
COMPM'V
~

und JOHN DOE

PLAI ' W •F'S' OIJJECTIONVOR THE RECOlIDllliGARDTNG

. Tl:l.E COlffiT'S QJU).ER DOC.[1SJ .

€ 0 1\1.ES NO\V. Plaintiffs by and through Lherr. attt)rney {if rCi:.t}rd and file..~ this

ohjectipn TO the h<;ino(a ble 1.:htef Ju<l_ge Dank l fordan.

Be\Ck'.(i:ROUND
r1i1he imJ.ant case. the 1,ononiblejudge Jord<1n fi.le<l.:an Ortjer a i'dcnial 9f Plai11Liff's

motion ~>r l'.~.!l~ms\tlerntion of 1'!11iriti Ff~ rnetion ti:f rcmani,l back: to s.tate coun.. J)oe.. l J &J.

Th~re rh~ Coun provided it·~ reasonin~ for the deniii I PfClvidctl 11\m1c;r(ius pi!Ssiig.es-as to
why ilic Cot1rr d_cnied 1he 1nC1tiun to !'C9.011.!iider. ~nd ~i.nc:e Plaintiff; fli:cd a.second .motion

BC"i!BIT

1
I·. . . .~
. ..:. . .~
 Gase 3:20-cv-004lf5-UPJ-FK6 Docut'iient l.SI Flied 0$/03/20 1?.a9e 2 ef7

to re1nand questlo.n lhe Coun's disc!·etion cm piercing the J;ileac,ii.ugs, there l'r'.ill nm he any

rfilison for l'laiati.tls to 111_en1ionth a1 bere.

f lowever. Plilimifl"s .attorney respecrfully is torced re (11Jlk.e u1is tecorli for the benefit

of-Plaimiffs slnce 1he Courtstated reuiurks 11iat mi2t1t cause Pl.ainri.ffs to as;;unie their
- . -· .

lmv)·cr mlghr be illiterate pr o thl:'.t\l'ise. ai1cltlrc rec·ord is aJsomade so-all readers

inc luding the highen.;ouns. Ifnceeli~llry c~111.fnUow Plainti n~.issuc:s before the dls_ttict

On pagt: f'.3) ofthe'C::ouu's Order in foot note 2. the -stating: "Near_ly ev.er statemen_t

from l'laiQtills' bric!~ thlll ls q1.1o te.d. in this Qrder t;_On(aiI:is multlple gnuumatlc;il 'ilnd!or

typqiraphical i:rror~. 'Rather iliau·liigh ligln"ir,g.eacb mistake, th&Courl will simply insert

a si n~e '\;ic'' a fter e:ad, ljuo le oontai.niug sud.1 .:rro1·~ .''

As n res1!lt, Plainrij)s' nHt1rncy ltttl-i tliat fur rile cautl~u~ 1if Plaintifls tllink-ing. in u

neg:atiYe- light 11b.011t their legal r~pre.sc:utative ahd ~ossibTy causlng hum1 to aoy Pl_aimiff's

Cl};;;:.s, I'laintiffi; aUoruey ho lds U1es.c trufh lO be !'a~rs.

F],SJ, we ~ei:111 to be .in 011 ag~ where the cqurl chooses to dismant le the lawye.r he.fore

t!Jf.!lll with hm:mful oonilile11ts. as llilt o·ne t ired in the above aforementio-ned:par_agraph. ll

appe;1rs that such co1mncms·are- 111)( providell tQ h~lp the atlonicy uudenill).nd: nor know

what is cxpcc;Jed by the CQurt, but n1.Lber vicii;ius wurils to· aUempt to disst1a<ltl. the lawyer

from workiTig!acg-uin~ Law before such conn.

Th~ issue in tllis wdrd merut heiirtcd statement is thliri t is. Likely true: lh!lt:PJaintiff'"

cmmscl h_a, several grn111 m,11ical errors within her-pleadil)"g[s). l:i_ul even witb ~ttt:!t.errors

2
 C?1Si:! 3:20-Cv-0041.8-DPJ-FKB Document 19 Flied 09/0$/20 Rage -3 of 7

it uppeare41hat the court uu_derstQod lhe argw11¢:nt and Lhat tlrc law as citi:tL likely had

granuiiatic~l tfrmrs ~s weJL and Plainifff 1 co(u\scl c-an only .copy and paslethc cited case

law.

l'lainti:ff'Sfttttimey makes tllis. rt;,t>rd tlfat she hiiS abs.irlute no power no authority

whi:n ii i:(1mes·ro ho\\ lhe,coun d:e:sir11s Phintlff's atto1ney to write. tt is ~ue lh,'Ii lhe

c9µr1, \vith a strik~ ()f his p.:n can hold l'laintiff'i; i).ttonicy in currte1i1pt for anything: Uie

cou.r1 d,;;'ires !ind tliere Is notliing .a pr.llc'ricing irttorn~y .can do about lt other than take

such mutters to the. highest courr of Ure land,

rtalntifil'
.'. -~ lhat tfiia$ flllurnev
must know . . .., hi!~ dot1
- e all that she
. can tih their·belmlf,in
.•

brlngi11g. fut!ir' issues- hofoi:e the colut. but lt uppears. by the rnean spi:rlted commcrus

upfolon of the c.ntlft t9ward the 1Jttomey. 11 would ,ee111 like.the tourr sh0uld welcome

attorneys· wltoniJ1ght vigorou~ly- has -sworn by the oalh LOpra:etice law. Norw!'e 'i\lll)'

tb'at is not the case in Lhis

. martei' i1£ wel I M other district·ct1urrs.
.

I\, ~uch, Pl,littli ff's attorney wa.nt~ tt\ ma.ice.sUrc that everyone involved in 1cg<1l

courtn)o1i1 argunlints·n 1ith (ills attomcy. underst,ands whai th_ey.are sce-ing. Plaintifts'

uuomey i.~11 btac!<: womiln. tr frefdom flgh_tcr of the 2.1 st lientury. Ye~. th·e writing and

gr1unmatica1 en·o{s as :;Lated by the cmm is a te~ult of Plaintiff's lawyer going ro pull]ic

schools wberc childr~1 lll;lcl. to ben1ore. c.OM1;e.m~<l:a!,out a:meal arid nl'lt b.eing.an,ackc<l'

While wulkl1\g. home from school lli,m lc,arning an the ways to pun~tuate-a parag_raph.
 case 3:2Q-ev-0041S~DPJ-FKB Document 19 Filecl 09/03/20 gage.4 of 7

Anoti1!'f reilson that ;his court along \\·lth o.rh~r court$ wfU find Plaintiffs la,~er a bit

dill:Crent _than nthct Jlracliciug attl'>rne:ys Ihut c_omes bcfure the 11\.\nbrabli: Jud!_!e, is that

this attorney Jnis bee11 through many attacks by ntaiJ; t, mcaJ1.heJrned an~ despiea.ble

people. Um atton1ey cYen this year hnfi had to fight ugail.1$ racism jLH,t to li ve ffl'her

personal !ionic <;vfth h-ei famil y. J\l)d.flS far as this attorney ean tell, that is all because

there are some people wh.om fU:e not Atrkatt Am~o~an, that wi 11like 11~ mu~h for !heir

n~ighhorho0d lo remain au w hite; H.ow.:ver, this at:torncy., as 1 hu.v~ ~ ught in·y ehiltlrea.

wou ld like lo kno,v that the ::iystem works. U1at the laws of the ·u.S. Constitution work_s
for all peo_ple.., and not SQme.

1'fointilll;' coiinsd takes.sud, menu sµiril~ d remarks from Lhis c0urt serious an_d as .a

method for Ihe courl to stop the very 1~g1:rting tlia1 Plaii)tlill; cc.mns~I $WQte Lo. vehemently

ugh<Jld. in t h.- etmrtro'O m.

Pl;,intiffii' counsel bas always uphel<ithc district uourt as a eourl (>fequaliry am1,ng all

people. 'Never h11d this lawyer belk:vcd tl1.11t this C:Qutt wu.ul~ not be respe.e.tfol lowutd all.

In 011::t, -Plairnifl'.esl!!eme.clthis.c.o urt as a honorab le aul!1or:ity ai1d has always respected the

;;an:re. However, Plaintiffs' 1.uwyer hii~ ao different i~ellng about the court even a-fter it i~

cls:ar that tl)e court desired theJn~1m ~pidted ,, unlN tri liumiU11te.aiid. etil!l.arra.ss P lalnti.frs

·filtoi;ney before th!," c·ipposing coonseb. l'lnintiffs ar.e--sure that the dcfeuda:nts.auornc.y-

fccl Wo.Iide.rfi.11 about the court's OtU<'I', .spccmu.a lly the harmful wor9s tlmt fue e()l.ifi

wrote. Pla~d ris have been made abreast ur11ic~e me ts i1I1d.1uey were asked il' 1hey would

Iik-t this lawy!:lr Lu '"'·nhtiraw from thei r case b,L~ed 6ll the coun Sl)git:sting that Ph\imilfa'

4
 Cas:e 3:20-cV-00418-DPJ-FKB Do.;urne"nt 19 F.lied 09/03izo Page 5 of 7

cvunse.1 is illiwratt. Plaintiffs' said. nu, tj1cy re~pecl Lhe fact that a black wo rtian is

belpilig th¢m ln spit.e o f the oppvsition from lhe.c-cmnas well us the·dcfcndan_ts.

l'luinrif'fs' counsel believe thfll 1he court des:i:gne,:li;uch ric,liC\1lcd wards to pat

Pininti[tf coun~-eJ in. uwe ofreceiving.dcui-al.and po~sibly a Jos:; ofPlainiills' case:which

is: why Lhis lawyer: wem over rhe order with Plaim_ifl~ an:d offei:·ep tr1 w ithdrew us cqunscl.

i Jowevet,)> La.inti Ifs e~unsel ~till says to lln; world tliat s he 1s- a freeooin fi-ghtifr no

diff~renl Ufat stJ'ong black v.·orheii sm:h as Harriet Tubman, ,vbo tbught forward in :1he

opposition of strong foroe~. El.rumill~ anprney contend thatj11s1ils Harriet o:i'ai.Je it, l \\i ll

l <:10 with .trti_s:spelle_d;words mid !?XammalfoaJ c1n1rs,.

CQNCf ,l/SJON

l'lainti ff~ file th_i_s,decumeru a~ an ol:ije.c(i~l) Cti the C/Jurl 's order reg;.1l'diilg the .Ct)lttt's l.ilirii
0

wqrds in the \:Olltf:d()(){IlO le 111.UHber l\VU.

P~aint iffs' ,rttorne.y is-.in. 011 wise being disrespectful to t.he-<.;hief j tid_g~ o r tlie /:).otirht;:rn

Di$tricl. instead maki11~ a record fr1rpvs.s i~lyiiJ?PC!<1I riii.d/o·r fortlie bc."ncfll of tlie-rea:.!cr~;

Respcc-tfully Subtu.ill.e_d thi<l rb.c 3rd day of September, 2020

£-s'IA11bv.Rul>his·on (J\'I BN. l0S1S7)

A1H:lY R0l1INSONl ./\WF1RM.PlLC..
227 E, Pearl Street
.IACKSC)N, M·~ 392'0 1
PH. 60 1-321-9.343
FAX. 901-4.87~6~·2()
EMA! I.: arobin..~onl-a.wfa1J1r'ti;vahoo,coi'n
EMAIL: abby®askabbvlaw.com

5
 ees? 3:20-cv-OP.:l.18-DPJ-FKB Document Ul Flied 09/03/20 Page 6 QI 7

I'.ERTTfl CATE OFSf,RvJCE

I the imclersigned declare th~! on 1\ug_ust is. 2010, ) hav!!. i:TJed Lhi~ 'doclJ.lllei1t ,\1ith tllc

cou1i, elcctn.micaliy, and Slich:System will delivet a c1}py fo au paities,

ls/Abby Robinson (MBN. JQ~J57)

AflilYROBINSOITT..A \V FIR.M: PT.L.C.
ll.7 E. P.earl Street
JA(;;~S()N, MS 392-0l
111:1. 601 -3:?J -9343
h\X. 60l•48?·.6'J26
T:MAlL-:- arobini-oolawfirm(@valwo.com
EMA IL: 'nl11iv!@aska:b.b,l11w.com

Jmnes C. M.Hrlin esq.

M.llrtin L~w Oilkc, T,L('
lOa-J3 W. Leake: ~tr~tt
Clinton. Missi.s~ip,pi 39Cf~6
.euiail: -im1miijlawraicmuc:a;;1
+
Qt":t
All<m1ey (or Defendant Ci~orge 's PlaN Anto.

DiIYid L-ee Gladden Jr.

'1:55 Pehhle Creek 8rive.
Madi.501i, !Ylissi~sippi 391 1.0
lgla<lde,c_i)gladdel-ngram.c;.om
i\rtorlley for GEJ<:O lnsuraric.e

6
Cas~ 3 '2P·c'v·0041B-DPJ·FKB -Document 19 Ried 09/0:3/20 -Page 7 (lf 7