Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Scientific
Experience Knowledge
Research
Tradition methods
New
Authority
Knowledge
WHAT IS RESEARCH?
Research is a way of thinking.
It involves examining critically the various aspects of day-to-day professional
work; understanding and formulating guiding principles that govern a
particular procedure; and developing and testing new theories that contribute
to the advancement of the profession.
Research is conducted to assess the validity of a hypothesis or an
interpretive framework. It aims at assembling substantive knowledge and
findings for sharing them, and contributing to existing body of knowledge.
The most common purposes of research are Exploration, Description and
Explanation.
Research conducted has to be reproducible.
RESEARCH APPLICATIONS
Consider yourself to be a front-line service provider, supervisor or health
administrator/planner. Here are some of the questions that you can pose to judge
functioning of your service.
Examples:
Studying different perspectives of an issue, views of people towards an issue uses unstructured
enquiries.
Studying how many people have a particular perspective of the issue, how many people hold
a particular view needs structured enquiry.
RESEARCH FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF MODE OF ENQUIRY
The structured approach to enquiry is usually classified as quantitative
research and unstructured as qualitative research.
However, a combination of both the research methods is a fairly common
option, known as Mixed studies.
A study is classified as qualitative if:
the purpose of the study is primarily to describe a situation, phenomenon, problem or event
the information is gathered through the use of variables measured on nominal or ordinal
scales (qualitative measurement scales)
if the analysis is done to establish the variation in the situation, phenomenon or problem
without quantifying it.
Example:
Qualitative research
The description of an observed situation, the historical enumeration of events, an account of the
different opinions people have about an issue, and a description of the living conditions of a
community.
Quantitative research
How many people have a particular problem?
How many people hold a particular attitude?
The use of statistics is not an integral part of a quantitative study. The main function
of statistics is to act as a test to confirm or contradict the conclusions drawn on the
basis of understanding the analysed data.
ETHICS IN RESEARCH
Most professions have an overall code of conduct that also governs the way
they carry out research. In addition, many research bodies have evolved a
code of ethics separately for research.
The concept of ethics revolves around working ‘in accordance with principles
of conduct that are considered correct, especially those of a given
profession or group’.
Any judgement about whether a particular practice is ethical is made on the basis of the code
of conduct prevalent at that point in time.
There are certain behaviours in research – such as causing harm to individuals, breaching
confidentiality, using information improperly and introducing bias – that are considered
unethical in any profession.
Collecting information:
Prior to conducting research wherein you need to ask questions to the participants, the
respondents’ consent must be obtained.
• In every discipline it is considered unethical to collect informationwithout the knowledge of
participants, and their expressed willingness and informed consent.
• Informed consent implies that subjects are made adequately aware of the type of
information you want from them, why the information is being sought, what purpose it will
be put to, how they are expected to participate in the study, and how it will directly or
indirectly affect them.
ETHICAL ISSUES CONCERNING RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS
Providing incentives
Some researchers provide incentives to participants for their participation in a study, finding
this to be quite proper as participants are giving their time. Others think that the offering of
inducements is unethical.
By popular opinion, giving a small gift after having obtained your information, as a token of
appreciation, is not considered as unethical. However, giving a present before data
collection is unethical.
Seeking sensitive information:
Information sought can pose an ethical dilemma in research.
• Certain types of information can be regarded as sensitive or confidential by some
people and thus an invasion of privacy. Questions on marital status, income and age may
be considered to be an invasion of privacy by some.
• Asking for this information may upset or embarrass a respondent. However, if you do not
ask for the information, it may not be possible to obtain information and contribute to the
existing body of knowledge.
Maintaining confidentiality:
Sharing information about a respondent for purposes other than research is unethical.
Thus the researcher needs to ensure that after the information has been collected, its source
cannot be identified.
ETHICAL ISSUES CONCERNING THE RESEARCHER
Anyone who collects information for the specific purpose of understanding,
consolidation, enhancement and development of professional knowledge,
adhering to the accepted code of conduct, is a researcher. S/he may represent
any academic discipline.
Code of conduct applicable to researchers include:
Avoiding Bias:
Bias is a deliberate attempt either to hide what you have found in your study, or to highlight
something disproportionately to its true existence.
Bias on the part of the researcher is unethical.
Incorrect reporting:
To report the findings in a way that changes or modify them to serve your own or someone
else’s interest is unethical. Correct and unbiased reporting of the findings are important
characteristics of ethical research practice.
ETHICAL ISSUES CONCERNING THE FUNDING ORG.
Most research is carried out using funds provided by sponsoring organisations
for a specific purpose. Common funding agencies include business
organisations, pharmaceutical companies, government, semi-government or
voluntary institutions, research bodies and/or academic institutions.
Restrictions imposed by the sponsoring organisation: Misuse of information:
However, sometimes there may be direct or indirect Sometimes sponsoring
controls exercised by sponsoring organisations. organisations use research
• They may select the methodology, prohibit the as a pretext to impose
publication of ‘what was found’ or impose other certain rules or for
restrictions on the research that may stand in the way obtaining management’s
of obtaining and distributing accurate information. agenda.
• Both the imposition and acceptance of these controls
and restrictions are unethical, as they constitute
interference and could extend to the sponsoring
organisation tailoring research findings to meet its
assigned interests.
VIOLATION OF ETHICS:
THE TUSKEGEE SYPHILIS STUDY
The Tuskegee Syphilis study was an
infamous research study that ran for
40 years, from 1932 to 1972.
About two-thirds of the men had syphilis and despite Penicillin being available (in 1942)
to be administered, the participants were deprived of it.
This continued until it was revealed to the public through a leak to the newspapers.
Only 74 participants survived, out of which 40 wives contracted the disease and 19
children were born with syphilis related deformities.
MISCONDUCT
IN
RESEARCH
MISCONDUCT IN RESEARCH
Scientific misconduct is most serious when it affects the truth claims of scientific
findings, as it then undermines the cumulative nature of scientific work and
development and may lead to practical applications that are harmful to patients.
#2 13 19 27 #2 15 21 27
However, the ease of Internet searches has simplified the detection of plagiarism,
and several dedicated professional plagiarism detection packages are now
available.
Name of the Journal Vol. Year Pages
Byline
Unsolicited authorship
Unsolicited authorship is where someone is listed as an author without their
knowledge or consent.
Its also involves ghost authorship; i.e. the person who really wrote the paper is
not listed as an author.
MISCONDUCT RELATED TO AUTHORSHIP
Authorship by coercion
Authorship achieved by coercion commonly occurs when a senior researcher, often
the head of a laboratory, demands to be an author on all publications from the
laboratory, regardless of whether or not he or she has fulfilled the criteria for
authorship.
Salami publication involves carving up the results of work done into the thinnest
possible slices that can still be published.
i.e. From one research project, you publish multiple related papers, that should have
been published as one paper.
If the link between the complete experiment and the parts are not made clear in the
publications, it may lead to double counting of the evidence in later reviews or
analysis.
SALAMI, IMALAS AND DUPLICATE PUBLICATION
Imalas publication is the sequential publishing of what are essentially the same
results, but with a few new data included in the analysis each time.
i.e. Similar papers published with little variation in data.
Imalas publication leads to the literature being cluttered with interim results,
which again makes it more difficult to gain an overview of the definitive results of
a project.