Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
R. A. Lieberman
September, 2009
1
OPTICAL CHEMICAL SENSORS
2
Optochemical Detection Techniques
3
Direct Spectroscopy
Definition: “Measuring the color of light to detect chemicals”
Absorption/Reflectance
Oldest chemical detection technique
UV-Vis-IR still dominates environmental detection
Modern frontiers: THz, deep UV(?)
Luminescence
Accepted standard for hydrocarbon detection
Modern frontiers: Single-molecule detection
Raman
Practical at last (made possible by lasers & holofilters)
Modern frontiers: Extreme signal enhancement (SERS)
4
“Titration”
Definition: “Using chemical reactions to detect
chemicals”
Oldest analytical chemical detection technique
Major thrust in late 19th and early 20th centuries
Eclipsed by spectroscopy; revived in late 20th century
Current practice ranges from “rediscovered” inorganic
reagents to fluorescent-labeled antibodies
Modern frontiers:
Increased analyte specificity (MIPs, “designed molecules”)
Improved performance (q-dots; NIR dyes)
New formats (optrodes, arrays, etc. – see following slides)
5
Refractometry
Definition: “Measuring refractive index to detect
chemicals”
First used to measure concentrations in known solutions
Total Internal Reflection (e.g., Abbe)
Common in food, petrochemical, other industries
Surface Plasmon Resonance
Used in commercial biochemical detectors
Modern frontiers: nanophotonics-enabled “plasmonics”
6
Refractometry
Optical path shift detection
Grating-based (planar; long-period fiber Bragg)
Interferometer-based (fiber optic M-Z/F-P, integrated optic)
Propagation constant measurements
Waveguide “pointer”
Waveguide cutoff
Ellipsometry (is this polarimetry?)
Modern frontier: Coupling refractometry with
“titration” (e.g. DNA oligos, antibodies, other
recognition elements)
7
Polarimetry
Definition:“Measuring polarization to detect chemicals”
Optical rotation measurement
Classically used to measure sugar concentration
Frontier: Chirality measurement for biomolecule detection
Circular dichroism – rarely used in sensing (small signal, short
wavelengths)
Nephelometry
Definition: “Measuring elastically scattered light to
detect chemicals”
Most-used air quality measurement (particle count)
Can be used to detect “titration” reactions
8
Optochemical Detection
Instrumentation
9
Optical Elements
Integrated Optic Waveguides
Planar lightwave circuits (PLC) – generally SiO2 on Si;
fabricated using semiconductor processing techniques
Polymer integrated optics
Wide range of materials
Many fabrication techniques: Embossing; “stamp-printing,” ink-jet
printing, photolithographic production
Advanced Materials
Nano-optical structures
Metamaterials
Controlled-geometry plasmonic features
10
Optochemical Detection Formats
11
Optochemical Detection Formats
Fiber-assisted direct spectroscopy
Silica fiber technology deployed “everywhere”
Chalcogenide & Fluoride gaining acceptance
New frontier: new fiber designs (photonic crystal; photonic
bandgap; hollow-core) will double spectral range
Fiber-assisted “titration”
Fiber optrodes
Distributed intrinsic chemical agent sensing
Multipoint active chemical sensors (gratings/scattering
centers couple light to sensor element)
12
Optochemical Detection Formats
Fiber-assisted refractometry
Tapered fibers
Fiber-tip Fabry-Perot optrodes
Long-period fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs)
Fiber optic Mach-Zehnder interferometers
Fiber optic SPR probes
Simple “Fresnel reflectance” probes
Fiber-assisted indirect measurements
Strain-inducing coatings on fibers with FBGs
Strain-inducing coatings on fiber interferometers
Stain-inducing microbending on fibers in cables
13
Optochemical Detection Formats
Integrated optic “titration”
Waveguide arrays with sensor claddings
Waveguide arrays with sensor cores
Interferometers with sensor coatings
Integrated optic refractometry
Interferometers without coatings
“Waveguide pointer”
Plasmon waveguides
Passive
Active
14
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Environmental Media
Environments
Chemical Targets
15
Environmental Media
16
Water
Drinking water
Recreational water
Groundwater
Open water
17
Air
Indoor air
Industrial emissions
Local air contamination
Global atmosphere
18
“Earth”
Soil surface
Other surfaces
Subsuface
19
Fire
Smoke detection
Flame detection
Combustion control/monitoring
20
Environments
21
Industrial/Commercial Environments
Factories/Refineries
Process control
Legal compliance
Health/safety
Landfills
Leakage
Fire/toxin safety
Mines
Legal compliance
Health/safety
Other: Restaurants, hospitals, etc.
22
Consumer/Home Environments
Indoor air quality
Smoke detection
Home water quality monitoring
23
Agriculture/Wilderness Environments
24
Chemical Targets
25
Chemical Targets
Natural
Toxic minerals in groundwater (Arsenic, lead, other minerals)
Smoke and fire byproducts (PAHs, etc.)
Biotoxins (e.g. microcystin from cyanobacteria)
Manmade
Factory effluent
Stack gases (NOx, SOx, CO, CO2)
Liquid outfall (100’s of chemical bypoducts & waste products)
“Fugitive emissions”
Polyaromatic hydrocarbons
other hydrocarbons
Accidental releases
Chlorine, ammonia, methyl isocyanate, other industrial products
Reaction intermediaries & raw materials (oil)
Purposeful releases
Terrorist attack
Industrial sabotage
26
OPTICAL CHEMICAL SENSORS FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS --EXAMPLES
Biotoxin Detection in Water
Toxic Chemical Detection on Surfaces
Toxic Chemical Detection in Air
Stack Gas Monitoring
Factory Effluent Monitoring
Groundwater Monitoring
Carbon Monoxide Monitoring
Fire Precursor Detection
27
Biotoxin Detection in Water
28
Biotoxin Detection in Water
29
Biotoxin Detection in Water
Drop of water containing pathogens is applied on the
test strip.
Sample reacts with the reagents on the test strip and is
transported across the membrane.
Quantum dot (QD) conjugated reagents bind to the
spots on the microarray.
QDs that emit at different wavelengths ensure that
cross reactivity or nonspecific binding can be identified.
Measuring fluorescence signals from multiple quantum
dots at each spot
improves specificity
Increases the viability of multiplexed field test strips.
Fluorescence of the QDs is measured with a portable
reader.
Fluorescence intensity is related to the concentration of
toxin in the sample.
30
Lateral Flow Strip for Single Pathogen
31
Lateral Flow Assay Process
Sample Migration
Sample Application
Pathogen Detection
32
Multi-Pathogen Lateral Flow Strip
Multiple QD-labeled
antibodies on reagent pad
Multiple antibody “spots”
replace capture line
Multiple antibody spots
also replace control line
33
Quantum Dot Fluorescent Labels
Make Multianalyte Biosensors Practical
•“Unlimited” choice of emission wavelenghs
•Extremely broad excitation band
•Single wavelength can excite all fluorophores
•Large Stokes shift
•No photobleaching
•Same matgerial used in all fluorophores
•Same synthesis process for all fluorophores
34
IOS Quantum Dot Fluorescence Spectra
35
E. Coli Assay Response
10
8
Intensity, AU
6
y = 6E-05x + 3.2842
R2 = 0.9769
0
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000
E. coli, CFU
36
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Assay Response
6.00
5.00
4.00
Intensity (au)
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
4
PA cells (x10 )
37
Toxic Chemical Detection
on Surfaces
38
Toxic Chemical Detection on Surfaces
BioProbe® Optical
Fiber
Probe
Optical Light
Fibers Bacteria Signals
on Surface
Laptop PC
39
BioProbe™ Operation
Compound excitation /detection probe
5mm diameter fiber bundle
Customized probe head
Can use single fiber
LED source excites bacterial fluorescence
Simplified detection unit selects for wavelengths
characteristic of living cells
Can “tune” for selected biotoxins
40
“Life Detection” Through Autofluorescence
41
BioProbe System Components
Windows-driven GUI
Computer-optimized
signal levels
User-settable alarm
threshold
43
System Performance
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Biomarker Concentration Factor
(Fraction of Toxic Level)
44
Monitoring Bacterial Biofilm Degradation
P. fluorescens Biofilm on Clear Polycarbonate
Treated with 37% Formalin
4900
Live biofilm covered w ith 200 μL
deionized w ater (4707 mV)
4700
Addition of another 5 drops
formalin (4485 mV)
4500
PMT output (mV)
Addition of 1 drop
formalin (4609 mV)
4300
3700
0 5 10 15 20 25
time (min)
45
BioProbe System Bacterial Response
Average Mean Voltage
Bacterial Bacterial Difference
Species Density between
(cfu/cm2) Bacteria and
Water (mV)
Pseudomonas
fluorescens 3.10 x 105 850
Pseudomonas
aeruginosa 5.09 x 106 800
Staphylococcus
aureus 1.25 x 107 580
Staphylococcus
epidermidis 1.84 x 107 750
46
“Life Detection”
Differentiation betw een Live and Killed Bacteria by
BioProbe®
3500
live samples
3000
killed samples
Signal Level (mV)
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3
Bacte rial Film s on Polym e r Surface
47
Toxic Chemical Detection in Air
48
Distributed Intrinsic Chemical Agent Sensing
and Transmission (“DICAST®”) System
LINEAR sensor, not a “point sensor”
Sensor cables respond to target chemical anywhere over
sensor length
Optical fibers in the cables are intrinsically sensitive to
individual chemicals
Two optoelectronic detection systems:
“Alarm-style”
Alerts user if even a single meter of cable is exposed
Self-referenced phase-locked-loop gives high-sensitivity and low
false alarm rate
Position-resolved:
Locates precise position of chemical agent
Self-referenced optical time domain reflectometry differentiates
between chemical and physical changes in fiber cable
49
DICAST® Sensor Principle:
Chemically-Induced Cladding Loss
Chemical agent
Indicator molecules
embedded in cladding
n2
Glass fiber core
n1
Light Input
Output
Polymer fiber cladding
50
From Light Launch to Equilibrium –
the “Spatial Transient”
51
DICAST® Sensor Fibers
Conventional fiber
fabrication
Patented optical design Cl2 HCN
Proprietary sensory
cladding
H2S Sarin/Soman
52
Hydrogen Cyanide Cladding Material
HCN 50PPM 50% RH 15 min
0.8
0.7
50 ppm-1min
0.6
0.5
Absorbance
0.4
0.3 Op. λ 532
0.2
0.1
0
-0.1
350 450 550 650 750 850
Wavelength (nm)
53
Hydrogen Cyanide Sensor Fiber Performance
TEST031805-1
0
S ensor S ignal (dB /m )
-1
50ppm
50ppm
-2
5ppm
5ppm
5ppm
-3
-4
54
Chlorine-Sensitive Cladding Material
Cl2 10 ppm 50% RH 2min
0.39
absorbance
0.29
Op. λ 650
0.19
0.09
-0.01
300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850
Wavelength (nm)
55
Chlorine Sensor Fiber Performance
SY63 Response 10 ppm Cl2/Air 10%RH
2.5
2
650 nm
1.5
dB
1 gas on
Absorbance
0.5
1310 nm
0
4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7
-0.5
Time (min)
56
Nerve Agent Sensor Cladding Material
Soman Response
Sarin Response
57
DICAST® Sensor Cables
Air-permeable sheath
Lets air in to react with fibers
Provides rugged protection against
shear stress
58
“Full Cable” DICAST® System Response
(Four Fibers, Two Wavelengths)
50ppm HCN 23C/50%RH
KEY
HYDROGEN CYANIDE FIBER
HYDROGEN SULFIDE FIBER
CHLORINE FIBER
NERVE AGENT FIBER
Solid: Visible
Dotted: Infrared
HCN on
59
DICAST® Optoelectronics
Zone-Alarm System
60
DICAST® Zone-Alarm Optoelectronics
End-to-end fiber transmission measured
Sensor cables linked to system through
commercial multimode cables
Dual-wavelength illumination
Visible: Responds to chemical agent
Infrared: Reference wavelength
Sources modulatedfrequencies
Lock-in detection
Eliminates stray light effects
Increases signal-to-noise ratio
61
Zone-Alarm DICAST® System
Metro Platform Test Site: 4 Fibers, 4 Zones
Passenger Platform Edge
480 ft
2 Std Cables
OUT1D
OUT1C
OUT1B
OUT1A
IN1D
IN1C
IN1B
IN1A
1D 1C 1B 1A IN2
spare spare spare spare
1DS 1CS 1BS 1AS IN3
OPEN
2D 2C 2B 2A 260 ft
OPEN 4 Std Cables
3D 3C 3B 3A
50 ft 80 ft 50 ft 80 ft 50 ft 80 ft 50 ft
From TC&C Room
1 Std Cable 2 Std Cables 1 Std Cable 2 Std Cables 1 Std Cable 2 Std Cables 1 Std Cable
1 Sensor Cable 1 Sensor Cable 1 Sensor Cable 1 Sensor Cable
23July07 v5
62
Zone-Alarm DICAST® Software
Local interface provides
immediate Safe/Alarm
status
Neural net combines
data from four fibers to
eliminate false alarms
Internet uplink provides
remote monitoring
capability
63
Position-Resolved DICAST®
(10 cm)
t= 0.5 nsec
2 meters
t= 10 nsec
t= 20.5 nsec
64
14 Meter Fiber Exposed to 100 ppm Chlorine
0.25 dB/m
1.9dB/m
2.6dB/m
Exposure
20 sec
20 sec
30 sec
65
DICAST® System Specifications
Parameter Requirement
Sensitivity Alarm when one meter or more is exposed
to 10% of toxic dosage dosage
Specificity Will not alarm with defined interferants
66
Factory Effluent Monitoring
67
Continuous Flow Assay for Low Vapor
Pressure Toxic Industrial Compounds
68
Microsphere-Bound Displacement Assay
69
Labeled Microspheres (10 µm)
70
Target Antigens
Surrogate Antigens
71
Quantum Dot Bio-Labeling
CdSe core, ZnS shell quantum dots
Coated with cysteine-lysine peptide chains
Cysteine binds to QD
Lysines bind to surrogate antigen
72
Fluorescence Excitation & Collection
73
Benchtop Model of Packaged System
Package:
Excitation
Collection
Flow cell
External:
Pump
Reagent
Computer
Signal processing
Power supply
74
Vortex Air Sampler/Extractor
76
Continuous Flow Water Effluent Monitoring
Same platform as
LVP-TIC monitor
Ab/Ag system for
new targets (e.g.,
PAHs, pesticides)
Water pump
replaces air
concentrator
77
Groundwater Monitoring
78
Techniques for In Situ Monitoring
Remote fiber optic spectroscopy
Excitation fiber carries laser light downhole
Collection fiber returns Raman & fluorescence to spectrometer
Neural network identifies & quantifies pollutants
Locally replenished liquid optrode
Liquid-phase irreversible chemical indicator system
“Dissolving solid” supplies continuous stream of reagent
Excitation & collection through separate fibers
Neural network identifies & quantifies pollutants
Active chemical refractometry
Long-period fiber grating diffracts light to cladding modes
Target compound swells chemically selective coating
Neural network identifies & quantifies pollutants
79
Raman Spectra of Target Compounds
80
Mixed Raman Spectrum – 3 Targets
81
Mixed Raman Spectrum – CHCl3 in Water
82
Fluorescence Spectra of Target Compounds
83
Mixed Spectra: Groundwater & Targets
6
Gr.water
Norm. Luminescence
5
4
Benzene
3 1500ppm
2 Toluene
1 120ppm
0 Xylene
6ppm
-1240 340 440
nm
84
Hybrid Neural Network Design
85
User Interface: Presenting Purity
GNDB
benze
tolue
xylen
GNDA
86
Solid-Phase Replenished Optrode
Controlled-Release
Polymer
88
Improving on Fujiwara
HO-+ HCX3 H2O + :CX3-
:CX3- X- + :CX2
89
Multiple Color-Producing Reactions
(chloroform 10 ppm)
1,2-Bis(4-Pyridyl)-Ethane 1,2-Bis(2-Pyridyl)-Ethylene
(0.2 M in THF) and TBAH (0.2M) (0.2 M in THF) and TBAH (0.2M)
4,4'-Dimethyl – 2,2'-Dipyridyl
(0.2 M in THF) and TBAH (0.2M)
90
Calibration Curve for Chloroform
91
Photobleaching Resets Reaction
92
Relocatable Groundwater Monitoring
Using a Cone Penetrometer
93
Fiber Bragg Gratings
94
Fiber Bragg Grating Spectral Behavior
95
Single Mode FBG Reflection Spectrum
Measured with IOS System
96
Long-Period Fiber Bragg Gratings
100
Transmittance 80
60
40
20
0
550 600 650 700 750
W a v e le ng th (nm )
For multimode fibers, Long Period Bragg Gratings
(LPGs) yield very rich transmission/reflection spectra
Coupling to cladding surface means that spectrum of
LPG depends on refractive index outside of cladding
Æ Can access the environment directly from the core
(CLADDING evanescent field coupling
97
Example: 49 ppm Kerosene vapor
in Contact With Surface of LPG-Fiber
98
Solid-Phase Extraction Coatings Enhance
LPG Response to Target Compounds
Differential permeability
Permeable to target vapors
Reduced permeability for other compounds
99
Kerosene-Aquasil-LPG Interaction
Transmittance (%)
100
80
60
40
20
0
500 550 600 650 700 750 800
Wavelength (nm)
100
Response of LPG Fiber to 63 ppm Decane
Coating: LLNL UR3
101
Response of UR3-LPG Fiber to 76 ppm Octane
Transmittance (%)
100
80
60
40
20
0
560 610 660 710 760
Wavelength (nm)
102
LPG Fiber Response to Solvent Vapors
(Coating: Aquasil)
100
Transmittance (%)
80
60
40
20
0
560 610 660 710 760
Wavelength (nm)
103
LPG Fiber Response to Solvent Vapors
(Coating: UR3)
100
Transmittance (%)
80
60
40
20
0
660 680 700 720 740 760
Wavelength (nm)
104
Error Histogram for 100 Measurements
105
Environmental Air Quality
Monitoring
106
Environmental Gas Monitoring
Photodetector
Lightsource
Neural
Network
O2
CO2
CO
Photodetector H2 O
107
Multi-Gas Air Quality Monitoring
Chemically active sensors
Optrodes
Indicator-doped porous-glass PICs
Multiple analytes
Multiple indicators and
Multiple reference channels
Multiple wavelengths
Neural net signal processing
Removes cross-response
Improves quantitation
108
Four-Optrode Long-Term Exposure
(Nitrogen Background)
Photodetector1
1500 Photodetector2
Photodetector3
Photodetector4
1000
Incident Light Power
500
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Time (min)
109
Four-Optrode Long-Term Exposure
(Ambient Environment)
1000
900
800
700
Incident Light Power
600
500
400
300
Photodetector1
Photodetector2
200 Photodetector3
Photodetector4
100
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Time (min)
110
Vaska’s Complex as a CO Indicator
111
Spectral Response to Carbon Monoxide
112
Carbon Monoxide Optrode Response
113
Carbon Dioxide Optrode
(“Severinghaus Optrode”)
CO2 (aq) + H2O —— > H2CO3 (Kh = 2.6 X 10-3)
114
Fluorescence Response of CO2 Optrode
115
CO2 Response Curve
116
Neural Net Deconvolution of
Multichannel Data
117
Fire Precursor Detection
3048 & 3084 & 3097
118
Fire Precursor Detection in Aircraft
Heated materials emit
vapors & gases
Carbon monoxide
Formaldehyde
Polymer/monomer
Gases have distinct
NIR spectra
Optical detection of
precursors “detects
fire before it occurs”
119
Carbon Monoxide Absorption Spectrum
120
Conventional Modulation Spectroscopy
Modulation
(Pressure, Stark)
Modulation
(Frequency, Shift)
121
Multi-Wavelength Modulated Fiber Laser
122
Thermo-Stabilized Multiline Laser
123
7-Line Fiber Laser Tuned for CO
124
20 ppm CO Detected With Multi-line Laser
125
Optical Chemical Sensors:
Good for Environmental Analysis!
TEST031805-1
5000 no loss of beads
1
0
4000
3000
Δ =1800 cps
Sensor Signal (dB/m)
-1
50ppm
-2
50ppm
5ppm
2000
5ppm
-3
5ppm
1000
-4 0
-5
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 600
450 500 550 600 650
Exposure Time (sec.)
100
Transmittance (%)
80
60
40
20
0
660 680 700 720 740 760
Wavelength (nm)
PR3 PR3
35
30 2500
2500 C
Cl
k1
25
20 1000 Cl Ir CO Ir CO
1000
15 500 500 k1
250 250 O
10 CO
5 0 0 0 0 PR3 PR3
0 50 100 150 200
Time (min)
126
Thanks to…
Funders Workers
National Science Foundation Dr. Glenn Bastiaans
(NSF) Ms. Manal Beshay
National Institutes of Health Dr. Kishology Goswami
(NIH) Mr. Jeffrey Iida
National Aeronautics and Dr. Lothar Kempen
Space Administration (NASA) Dr. Edgar Mendoza
Environmental Protection Dr. Vladimir Rubtsov
Agency (EPA)
Dr. Indu Saxena
U.S. Department of Defense
Dr. Roland Suri
U.S. Department of State
Dr.Igor Ternovskiy
Dr. Srivatsa Venkatasubbarao
Audience
YOU!
127