Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Abstract
The Ugaritic trading station at the crossroads for the east/west- and north/south-routes has been an
inspiring laboratory for linguistic experiments. The traders needed a “universal” writing system to
document their contracts.
The system should be designed to serve a bundle of languages and dialects.
The writing system had to be based on a simple, universal concept in which the symbols could be
arranged according to their phonetic characters: medium/high and low vowels, respectively
soft/medium and hard consonants.
This structured concept started as a ternary system with 15 symbols, sorted in 4 or 5 phonetic
categories (guttural, labial, palatal, lingual/dental). Additional refinement (L,M,N,R,S,Θ,
[T],Gh,Z,Ẓ) may have extended the basic concept to a larger alphabet.
The quantization of the alphabets is based with regard to the five positions of the vocal organs in
producing the sounds, and with regard to sonant intensity, which is quantized at values of
approximately 3 letters / category.
The core sections of the Ugaritic, Greek, Old Persian and Latin alphabets with 17, 14, 15
respectively 13 letters must be considered as optimally coded communication systems.
Flinders Petrie's “Horn-Book”
Flinders Petrie's “Horn-Book1” may be considered as the first suggested 4-column concept of an
alphabet, which later had been extended by a few symbols such as ζ,, ρ, ς and λ, μ, ν, ξ. These 7
extra symbols may have been added for various reasons.
It had long ago been noticed by Lepsius, Donaldson, and Taylor that, embedded in the
Phoenician, Greek, and Italian alphabets there is a repeated sequence of letters,—vowel,
labial, guttural, and dental. What has however been ignored is that this system is
extended a whole series further in the Greek than in the Phoenician alphabet, forming a
fifth row and the beginning of a sixth. The liquids and sibilants were added later and
form no part of such a scheme.
It will be shown how we may develop further the old view that the order is (1) a series
of vowel-labial-guttural-and-dental, a b c d, e f g θ, i k, o p q t, with (2) some losses in
the third row, (3) some additions of liquids2, and (4) addition of sibilants irregularly.
Obviously the original concept fitted in a 4 column-structure, which is identified in Flinders Petrie's
periodic table for the Greek alphabet (1912):
The first concept of the alphabet ranges from A...T and has been extended in later stages.
Unfortunately Flinders Petrie's study (1912) could not include the Ugaritic alphabet, which had
been published before the discovery of the Ugaritic cuneiform tables.
1 The formation of the alphabet (Petrie, W. M. Flinders) (1912): It had long ago been noticed by Lepsius, Donaldson,
and Taylor that, embedded in the Phoenician, Greek, and Italian alphabets there is a repeated sequence of letters,—
vowel, labial, guttural, and dental
2 Liquids are L, M, N ( Λ, Μ, Ν).
The role of the vowels in Flinders Petrie's “Horn-Book”
In Flinders Petrie's “Horn-Book3” the vowels are listed in the first column, which may indicate the
priority and symbolic importance of the vowel category.
The addition of vowels may have been a revolutionary step to indicate the vowels for non-Semitic
traders and their documentation.
Vowels are not listed in Semitic scripture. Therefore the Semitic alphabet contains only contains
phonemes which are generated by one of the phonetic categories (guttural, labial, palatal,
lingual/dental). Flinders Petrie's sketch of the “Horn-Books” are based on the vowels, which are
produced by an open vocal tract.
Samples of German do not follow Flinders Petrie's sketch with vowels in the first column:
Fig. 2 A mould for German leaden hornbooks with an impression (G erman Hornbook
(Public Domain) uploaded by Phrood from Tuer’s History of the Horn-Book, 1896. (Source: Buchstabentafel)
3 The formation of the alphabet (Petrie, W. M. Flinders) (1912): It had long ago been noticed by Lepsius, Donaldson,
and Taylor that, embedded in the Phoenician, Greek, and Italian alphabets there is a repeated sequence of letters,—
vowel, labial, guttural, and dental
Ugarit's history
From c. 1500 BCE until its destruction in c. 1200 BCE Ugarit was an ancient port city in northern
Syria, in the outskirts of modern Latakia, discovered by accident in 1928 together with the Ugaritic
texts.
Trading connections
Ugarit had close connections to the Hittite Empire, Egypt and Cyprus, documented in the archives
recovered from the site. The polity was at its height from c. 1450 BCE until its destruction in c.
1200 BCE. Neolithic Ugarit was important enough to be fortified with a wall early on, perhaps by
6000 BCE, though the site is thought to have been inhabited earlier.
Ugarit was important perhaps because it was both a port and an entrance to the trade
route to the Euphrates and Tigris lands. The city reached its heyday between 1800 and
1200 BCE, when it ruled a trade-based coastal kingdom, trading with Egypt, Cyprus,
the Aegean, Syria, the Hittites, and much of the eastern Mediterranean.[2] 4
Lists of Ugaritic letters (abecedaria, singular abecedarium) have been found in two
alphabetic orders: the "Northern Semitic order" more similar to the one found in Arabic
(earlier order), Hebrew and Phoenician, and more distantly, the Greek and Latin
alphabets; and the "Southern Semitic order" more similar to the one found in the South
Arabian, and the Ge'ez alphabets. 7
Ugaritic was an augmented abjad. In most syllables only consonants were written, including the /w/
and /j/ of diphthongs. However, Ugaritic was unusual among early abjads in also writing vowels
after the glottal stop. It is thought that the letter for the syllable /ʔa/ originally represented the
consonant /ʔ/, as aleph does in other Semitic abjads, and that it was later restricted to /ʔa/ with the
addition, at the end of the alphabet, of /ʔi/ and /ʔu/.[4][5] 8
2 h(e) → w→ z→ ḥ→ ṭ→
E6 W7 Z8 H9 Θ10
(Θ,Þ)
3 y→ k→ š→ l→ m→ ḏ→ n→ ẓ→ s→
Y11 K12 (Ś13) L14 M15 (Z16) N17 (Ẓ18) S19
4 ʿ→ p→ ṣ→ q→ r→ ṯ→ ġ→ t→
O20 P,Φ21 Ṣ22 Q23 R24 Θ 25 (Gh26) T27
5 ʾi → ʾu → s2 →
(Ƕ28 (I)) (Ω29 (U)) (S30)
Table 3 Periodic Table for the Ugaritic alphabet in the "Northern Semitic order"
(Categorized according to the Hebrew standard of Rabbi Saadia Gaon's comments)
2 h(e) → w→ z→ ḥ→ ṭ→
E6 W7 Z8 H9 Θ10 (Θ,Þ)
3 y→ k→ š→
Y11 K12 (Ś13)
4 ʿ→ p→ ṣ→ q→ ??
O20 P,Φ21 Ṣ22 Q23 (T27)
Table 6 Basic alphabetical core of the Ugaritic Alphabet in the "Northern Semitic order"
(Categorized according to the Hebrew standard of Rabbi Saadia Gaon's comments)
The category “linguals”
According to the Hebrew book “Sefer Yetzirah” the tongue is involved in all linguistic categories.
Therefore each category includes a “lingual” contribution, which may interfere with other
categories. The phonetic categorization “genuine lingual“ may be is described as follows:
The twenty-two letters of the Hebrew alphabet are classified both with reference to the
position of the vocal organs in producing the sounds, and with regard to sonant
intensity. In contrast to the Jewish grammarians, who assumed a special mode of
articulation for each of the five groups of sounds, the Sefer Yetzirah says that no sound
can be produced without the tongue, to which the other organs of speech merely lend
assistance. Hence the formation of the letters is described as follows:
The phonetic definition of "vowel" (i.e. a sound produced with no constriction in the
vocal tract) does not always match the phonological definition (i.e. a sound that forms
the peak of a syllable).[6] The approximants [j] and [w] illustrate this: both are without
much of a constriction in the vocal tract (so phonetically they seem to be vowel-like),
but they occur at the onset of syllables (e.g. in "yet" and "wet") which suggests that
phonologically they are consonants.
A G C D B
Ī K Ç Θ F M N Y V R L S Z Š H
Ū X J T P
Table 8 Periodic table for the Old Persian cuneiform alphabet
This may be resorted to the alphabetical order as follows:
A B C G D
Ī F Ç K Θ M N Y V R L S Z Š H
Ū P J X T
Table 9 Restructured Periodic table for the Old Persian cuneiform alphabet
In analogy to the extended letters L14, M15, Z16, N17, Ẓ18, S19, R24, Θ 25, Gh26, T27 in the Ugaritic
alphabet the Old Persian letters M, N, Y, V, R, L, S, Z, Š, H belong to the extended region.
Comparing the Periodic tables for Old Persian and the Ugaritic alphabet
The basic core ( A, B, C, G, D, Ī, F, Ç, K, Θ, Ū, P, J, X, T ) for the Restructured Periodic table for
the Old Persian cuneiform alphabet is more or less equivalent to Flinders Petrie's “Horn-Book”:
Except for the Zeuṣ-section the core section of the Old Persian cuneiform alphabet correlates with
the core section of Flinders Petrie's “Horn-Book” and the Ugaritic alphabet.
The labial vowel U may have been derived from the digamma F. This extension requires an extra
fifth line in the alphabet:
The 7 letters in the range linguals (R, Z, except D), dentals (L, S, T) and nasals (M, N) may belong
to the extended section. Also the J, V, W, X, Y, Z do not belong to the core selection.
This 26-letter Latin alphabet is characterized with:
• a 13-letter section of extended letters: L, M, N, R, S, T, Z and J, U, V, W, X, Y.
• a core section of 13 letters (including 4 vowels A, E, I, O) in 4 rows: (1) A, B, C, D, (2) E,
F, G, H, (3) I, K, (4) O, P, Q.
Table 13 The basic alphabetical core and the extensions in the Periodic Table for the Ugaritic
alphabet in the "Northern Semitic order"
The ternary character for the basic alphabetical core
In the basic alphabetical cores of the Old Persian and Ugaritic alphabets the number of entries
largely match the optimal ternary limit of the three elements for each category:
In Information theory11 the ternary numeral system is superior to the binary – system
and is considered as the most efficient coding system. The ternary numeral system is a
base-3 counting system. The binary number system is a representation of numbers using
only two digits (0 and 1). Although the ternary numeral system is superior engineers
prefers the binary number system for the designs in computer and communication
technology.
The problem of optimal coding of numbers has been examined by many scholars (e.g.
[112][213]) and it is known that ternary coding is more efficient than binary coding [3 14].
In technology binary coding is preferred for its simplicity. Ternary coding remains
relevant in algorithms that use decision trees15.
Theoretically this condition (three elements for each category) limits the number of letters in the
basic alphabetical cores to 5 x 3 = 15 symbols. The core sections of the Ugaritic, Greek, Old Persian
and Latin alphabets with 17, 14, 15 respectively 13 letters must be considered as optimally coded
communication systems:
• The basic alphabetical core of the long Ugaritic cuneiform alphabet contains 17 letters in 4
rows:
(1) A1, B2, G3, Kh4, D5, (2) E6, W7, Z8, H9, Θ10, (3) Y11, K12, Ś13, (4) O20, P,Φ21, Ṣ22, Q23.
• The core section of Flinders Petrie's “Horn-Book” for the Greek alphabet is limited to 14
characters in 4 rows:
(1) A B C D, (2) E F G Θ, (3) I K, (4) O P Q T.
• The basic core for the Restructured Periodic table for the Old Persian cuneiform alphabet
contains 15 letters in 3 rows:
(1) A, B, C, G, D, (2) Ī, F, Ç, K, Θ, (3) Ū, P, J, X, T.
• a core section of the Latin alphabet contains 13 letters (including 4 vowels A, E, I, O) in 4
rows: (1) A, B, C, D, (2) E, F, G, H, (3) I, K, (4) O, P, Q.
The first column seems to start each line with a vowel or equivalent consonant character. Each of
these alphabets is equipped with at least 4 categories.
11 Information theory studies the quantification, storage, and communication of information. It was originally proposed
by Claude Shannon in 1948 to find fundamental limits on signal processing and communication operations such as
data compression, in a landmark paper titled "A Mathematical Theory of Communication".
12 Frieder, G., Fong, A. and Chow, C.Y. (1973). A balanced ternary computer. Conference Record of the 1973
International Symposium on Multiple-valued Logic, pp. 68–88.
13 Hurst, S.L. (1984). Multiple-valued logic - Its status and its future. IEEE Trans. Computers, C-33, 1160–1179.
14 Hayes, B. (2001). Third base. American Scientist 89: 490-494
15 A Ternary Encoding to Optimize Communications and Cooperation
Traces of words in the periodic tables of the alphabets
A similar word is identified in the “AE”of “ἈΕΊ” (always), which usually is written as a “æ” and is
interpreted as “forever”, “eternity, law, marriage”.
• In Old English : From Proto-Germanic *aiwō, *aiwaz (“law”), from Proto-Indo-European
*h₂oywos (“eternity, law”). Cognate with Old Saxon êo, Old Frisian ewa, êwe, ê, â, Old
High German êwa, êha, êa, ê (German Ehe).
• In Old Norse : From Proto-Germanic *aiwi (“forever”). Cognate with Old English ā, āwa,
ǣ, Old Saxon eo, io, ia, Old High German eo, io.
Obviously the chain of vowels is interpreted for eternity and any other word for eternal duration
such as marriage, law, tradition and other wishful expectations.
The word "A.E.I.O.U." (sometimes A.E.I.O.V.) was a symbolic device coined by Frederick III
(1415–1493) and historically used as a motto by the Habsburgs.
The cryptic formula AEIOU is an enigma that has occupied generations of historians.
Unfortunately, its creator, Emperor Frederick III, never revealed exactly what he meant by it19.
One note in his notebook (discovered in 1666), though not in the same hand, explains it in German
and Latin as "All the world is subject to Austria" (Alles Erdreich ist Österreich untertan or Austriae
est imperare orbi universo).[1]
Frederick habitually signed buildings such as Burg Wiener Neustadt or Graz Cathedral
as well as his tableware and other objects with the vowel graphemes.[2] As of 2017,
A.E.I.O.U. is the motto of the Theresian Military Academy, established in 1751. It can
also be found on the wall of the Chancellor's office in the Federal Chancellery. 20
Obviously Frederick never explained his AEIOU-device, which he may have discovered as a young
man while he visited the Near East in a crusade.
Frederick's first use of the five-letter monogram was in 1437, when he was Duke of
Styria.
Since Frederick wrote this acronym when he was not yet the ruler of the Archduchy of
Austria and, at that time, Styria was entirely separated from Austria and was not
considered to be its part until the next century, the term "Austria" in this context would
not mean Austria as a territory or a nation, but rather the "House of Austria", that is, the
Habsburg dynasty.
More than 300 Latin and German interpretations have been attempted over the
centuries; most of these versions refer to a motto of present-day Austria or the extensive
Habsburg Monarchy. 21
19 "AEIOU"
20 A.E.I.O.U.
21 Interpretation A.E.I.O.U.
22
A-E-H-I-O-U-Ω in Egyptian Religion (350 BCE)
The Greeks may have extended their alphabet to 7 vowels, although Flinders Petrie does not include
the letter H in the vowels.
Fig. 7 The Greek word AEIOΥΩ in the first column of Flinders Petrie's
periodic table for the Greek alphabet (1912) – The letter H is missing.
A remarkable historical remark to divine names in Egyptian religion may be found in the work De
Elocutione of Demetrius23 and this seems to refer to the archaic vowels, which may have been
uttered in their succession A-E-H-I-O-U-Ω24:
“71. In Egypt the priests, when singing hymns in praise of the gods, employ the seven
vowels, which they utter in due succession ; and the sound of these letters is so euphonious
that men listen to it in preference to flute and lyre. To do away with this concurrence,
therefore, is simply to do away entirely with the music and harmony of speech.—But perhaps
this is not the right time to enlarge on these matters.25”
The principal application of vowels is to produce sounds with an open vowel tract. The role of the
consonants is to define the exact timing for the opening and closing phases in controlling the vowel
tract26.
Of course the Periodic Table of the Greek alphabet (24 letters) may be adapted to 7 vowels:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Vowels Labials Gutturals Lingual palatals Dentals Nasals
1 α1 β2 γ3 δ4
2 ε5 [/f/] ζ6
3 η7 θ8
4 ι9 κ10 λ11 μ12 ν13 ξ14
5 ο15 π16 [/q/] ρ17 σ/ς18 τ19
6 υ20 φ21 χ22 ψ23 Ψ23, ζ24
7 ω24
Table 14: Periodic Table of the Greek alphabet (24 letters)
22 The Vowels' Symbolism in Archaic Hymns - Notes to the vowels in De Elocutione of Demetrius
23 Demetrius, of Phaleron, b. 350 B.C. Spurious and doubtful works
24 The Mystery of the Seven Vowels
25 Demetrius On style, the Greek text of Demetrius De elocutione
26 The Hermetic Codex II - Bipolar Monotheism (Scribd)
Another viewpoint to read the alphabet
For a horizontal reading of the rows of vowels we may suggest to compose another alphabetical
table by sorting the vowels in a row. The following table suggests how the Egyptian priests may
have been able to read the seven vowels, which they utter in due succession.
The Greek words ἈΕΊ: “always”, “eternity”), Italian ΙΟ (“I”), Romansh ΙΟU (“I”) may be identified
in the first line AEHIOUΩ.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Vowels Α1 Ε 5 Η7 Ι 9 Ο15 Υ20 Ω24
2 Labials Β2 [/F/] Π16 Φ21
3 Gutturals Γ3 Κ10 [/Q/] Χ22
4 Linguals Ρ17
5 Palatals Σ18 Ψ23
6 Dentals Δ4 Ζ6 Θ8 Λ11 Τ19 Ψ23, Ζ24
7 Nasals Μ12
Ν13
8 Ξ14
Table 15 Periodic Table of the Greek alphabet (24 letters)
This viewpoint also allows to sort the alphabet in a different pattern, which is equivalent in the
Sanskrit alphabet:
Α1,Ε5,Η7, Ι9, Ο15,Υ20,Ω24, Β2,/F/,Π16,Φ21, Γ3,,Κ10,/Q/,Χ22,, Ρ17,,, Σ18,Ψ23, Δ4,Ζ6,Θ8,Λ11,Τ19, Ψ23, Ζ24,, Μ12,,,, Ν13,,,, Ξ14
Now the list is sorted as follows: Vowels (Gutturals, Palatals, Labials), followed by consonants:
Labials, Gutturals, Linguals, Palatals, Dentals. The grouping of the vowels and consonants may be
comparable to the structure of the Sanskrit's order:
Fig. 9The first column (the vowels A, E, I, O, U) in the periodic table of the Latin alphabet.
The (approximately) 150 following papers are sorted according to the initial upload date27 :
• The Quantization of the (Ugaritic) Alphabet
• De architectuur van het Oegaritische alfabet
• A Periodic Table for Ugaritic Signaries as a Root for the Sky-god Dyaus and the Personal
Pronouns for the 1st Person Singular and Dual Form
• Periodic Tables for the Gaelic (Irish and Scottish alphabets (Scribd)
• Did the Word „Deus“ Exist in the Archaic Alphabets (Scribd)
• Periodic Tables for the Euboean and Etruscan Alphabets (Scribd)
• A Periodic Table for the Greek Alphabet
• Periodic Tables for the Upper and Lower Sorbian Alphabets
• Overview of the Periodic Tables of the Sami Languages
• Eight Periodic Tables for the Sámi Languages
• Het hart van de Nederlandse taal
• Periodic Tables for the Sami Alphabets
• A Periodic Table for the Dutch Language
• Periodic Tables for the Dalecarlian Runes and the Elfdalian Alphabet (Scribd)
• The Hierarchical Structure of the Hebrew Alphabet (Scribd)