Running Head: RESEARCH METHODS

Research Methods

[Name of Institute]

[Name of Student]

[Date]
 Research Methods 2

Table of Contents

Introduction...............................................................................................................................................3
Purpose......................................................................................................................................................3
Methods.....................................................................................................................................................4
Direct observation..................................................................................................................................4
Open-ended surveys...............................................................................................................................4
Focus group...........................................................................................................................................5
In-depth interviews................................................................................................................................5
Oral history............................................................................................................................................5
Participant observation..........................................................................................................................5
Ethnographic observation......................................................................................................................5
Content analysis.....................................................................................................................................6
Pros and Cons............................................................................................................................................6
Data sources..............................................................................................................................................7
Data quality...............................................................................................................................................7
Rough sleeping in London: an overview...................................................................................................8
Number of rough sleepers......................................................................................................................8
Conclusion...............................................................................................................................................10
References...............................................................................................................................................11
 Research Methods 3

Research Methods

Introduction

Qualitative research is a type of sociological research that compiles and works with non-

numerical statistics and tries to identify the importance of information that helps to understand

public activities through research on specific residents or places (Lune and Berg, 2016). People are

responsible for this in contrast to quantitative research, which uses numerical data to recognize the

change in magnitude and uses measurable tasks to determine the causal relationship between

factors. In humanism, qualitative research tends to focus on less social collaboration than is an

everyday occurrence, although quantitative research tends to focus on large-scale patterns and

wonders (O'Sullivan, et al., 2016).

Purpose

Qualitative research has a long history in the human sciences and has been used in it for a

long time. Social scientists have long been working on this type of research because it allows

scientists to investigate the effects that people have on their behavior, actions, and interactions with

others (Tracy, 2019). While quantitative research is helpful in identifying relationships between

factors, such as the relationship between need and racial disdain, qualitative research can shed light

on why these links are legitimate for the source: the individuals themselves (Smith, 2019).

Qualitative studies are designed to discover consequences that highlight the efficacy or

results generally judged by quantitative research. In this way, qualitative researchers investigate the

consequences, understanding, images and practices and the connection between public activities.

This type of research provides interesting information that the researcher must determine with

detailed and reflective techniques to translate, code, and explore patterns and materials (Veal,

2017). Because the centerpiece is the normal daily existence and familiarity of individuals,
 Research Methods 4

qualitative research sneaks in to create new hypotheses with an inductive policy that can then be

tested by further research.

Methods

Qualitative scientists use eyes, ears, and ideas to capture intelligence and portraits of

residents, places, and opportunities focused inside and outside (Bryman, 2016). Its results are

compiled by different methods and periodically the researcher will use two or more at the same

time while making a qualitative report:

Direct observation

With direct observation, the researcher observes people as they approach them daily,

without getting involved or upset. This type of research is often unclear to those under

investigation, and in this role they should focus on open spaces where people do not have an

adequate need for protection. For example, an investigator may observe how outsiders gather in

daylight when they rush to watch entertainment (Hennink, et al., 2020).

Open-ended surveys

While numerous evaluations are intended to produce quantitative information, many are

considered open-ended research that takes into account qualitative and age information research.

For example, the poll can be used to examine which political voters have been chosen by voters,

regardless of why they were elected, in their own words (Ghauri, et al., 2020).

Focus group

During a central meeting, the researcher draws a small meeting of members to discuss and

gather relevant information about the research question. Collection kits can contain 5 to 15
 Research Methods 5

members. Social scientists often use them to consider such events or patterns in a particular

network. And they are generally in statistical surveys (Bell, et al., 2018).

In-depth interviews

Scientists manage the meetings from top to bottom by talking to partners in an individual

setting. In some cases, the researcher attends a prearranged meeting of a series of questions or

topics, but still allows the discussion to take place beforehand, depending on how the member

responds. On several occasions, the researcher has pointed out certain problems, but does not have

a traditional discussion guide, but is guided by the member (Ghauri, et al., 2020).

Oral history

An oral history program is used to temporarily record events, meetings, or networks, and

generally involves holding indoor and outdoor meetings with some members during a participation

period (Veal, 2017).

Participant observation

This technique is like a perception, however, with this method the scientist also participates

in activities or opportunities to follow others and participates directly in the framework (Tracy,

2019).

Ethnographic observation

Ethnological perception is the most serious observation technique indoors and outdoors.

Starting with human research, using this technology, the researcher has fully immersed himself in

the research environment and lived among the members for months and years. In doing so, the

scientist strives to find daily information from the perspective of those who are focused on creating

archives on the Internet, occasions, or observed patterns from top to bottom (Ghauri, et al., 2020).
 Research Methods 6

Content analysis

Sociologists use this policy to disrupt public activities by discrediting words and images

from archives, movies, production, music, and other social media and media. Scientists reflect on

how words and images are used and the environment in which they are based on the foundations of

the underlying culture. Research into the content of computer material, especially that created by

Internet users throughout their lives, has become familiar with sociological methods (Veal, 2017).

While much of the information generated by qualitative research is only coded and

disaggregated by the eyes and minds of research, the use of hyphens to perform these actions is

gradually becoming known within sociology. Such a program query is useful when the information

is abnormally overwhelming to the people you are dealing with, but the lack of a human mediator is

a typical analysis of application usage (Tracy, 2019).

Pros and Cons

Qualitative research has two advantages and disadvantages.

 In addition, it provides an internal and external vision of the perspectives, practices,

collaborations, opportunities and social practices related to normal daily life. By working as

such, social scientists can see how everyday life affects things throughout the community,

such as social structure, social demand, and diverse social power.

 This set of technology also has the advantage of being adaptable and effective with many

facets of changes in research conditions and, as a general rule, can be based on negligible

costs.

 One of the shortcomings of qualitative research is that scaling is really limited, so its results

are by no means widely available to summarize.

 Scientists must also use advocacy through these methods to ensure that they do not

influence information in a way that completely changes them and that they do not have a

disproportionately unique tendency to understand their understanding of the results.

 Research Methods 7

 Fortunately, qualitative scientists are preparing thoroughly to avoid or reduce this type of

research choice.

Data sources

The CHET database was the basic data source that NatCen received. To sharpen the strictest

management data sets, Broadway has provided data from a variety of sources:

• Refinement House (CH) Facts: for previously uncomfortable sleeping accommodations that have

been helpful over long distances that were originally fenced off for acute anesthesia as part of the

Rough Sleep Initiative

• Information on the current administrative services of CLG Support Information, Resource

Information Service (RIS), CLG Financial Reform Information (HCIP).

Data quality

The nature of the information in the CHAIN database has improved over time. Information

gathering started in 1996 as part of the Outreach Directory project. In 2001, the Rough Sleep

Register made an exception to this. Information from the two companies was transferred to the

KETTA mailbox when it was launched in December 2001. Information on KETNA is currently

listed for each of these parties (O'Sullivan, et al., 2016).

Several material information queries show a significant improvement in the quality of

information 2001/02. And again 2004/05. A variety of information changes in quality during the

observation period. Therefore, the data entered in the report is identified by different time limits:

we try to use as much data as possible without including incomplete or missing data. The data is

recorded during the financial years. This is consistent with other KETNAs that discovered the

experiments and allowed additional information to be included in the test, i.e. From the first three

months of 2008, based on the fact that the survey started in April 2008. A special case where the
 Research Methods 8

information center administration information (RIS) is housed. Host catalogs appear very quickly

in the last part of current billing (Smith, 2019).

Rough sleeping in London: an overview

London's unfavorable population has changed from 2000-01 to 2007/08 over the eight-year

period. We reviewed the data in the CHAIN database and sampled the number of uncomfortable

thresholds and formatted the first acute thresholds (Bryman, 2016).

Number of rough sleepers

There are several methods to test how sharp the dose is. CLG's philosophy is to track

changes in the amount of acute sleep through elevations, demonstrating an overnight sleepless

vacation. The National Audit Office reports that highway inspections are "the most accurate part of

the total size [of uncomfortable sleep] and change after a while (Ghauri, et al., 2020)." The number

of people who have registered as uncomfortable on the road has dropped from 1,850 from 1998 to

483 a year, indicating real and achievable reductions in naps over the past decade. This report

analyzes in detail the number of people who have had an unpleasant nap in KETNA, that is. Strong

peace that workers in London observe at different times.

Legally, this data does not closely resemble road information, despite the fact that the data

is later reviewed at KJN. The number of people workers who contacted them watched closely has

changed during the eight-year perception period, from a peak of 3,395 since 2000/01 (Bell, et al.,

2018). Until 2579 from 2003/04. In 2004/05. The data shows a slight and constant increase in the

number of uncomfortable thresholds in the last four years, with more than 2,500 since 2004/05.

Maximum 3,000 as of 2007/08. Part of this expansion could reflect more conflicts over time (i.e.

more conflicts leading to more contact with uncomfortable sleeping people), despite the fact that no

power adjustments are being made and would not account for all the climb (Tracy, 2019).
 Research Methods 9

The moral structure of the first and awkward sleepover in London also changed over a

period of eight years. The level of anger among national institutions among London's beautiful old

dormitories is steadily declining, from 80 percent in 2000/01. 63 percent in 2007/08. At the same

time, the number of people uncomfortable sleeping other than dark or dark British has increased

from 13% to 20%, and the proportion of Chinese or mixed populations has increased from just 4%

to 7.5%. The largest increase was reported in the uncomfortable Asian or Asian-British sleep base,

which was less than one percent of London's acute sleep in 2000/01, compared to exactly five

percent in 2007/08 (O'Sullivan, et al., 2016).

Citizenship data suggests that the number of dormitories in the UK, Asia is low: many of

those living in the slums to show long distance citizens of British citizens in hard rooms in London.

This is especially considered if we change our minds before 2004/05. In 2005/06. To ban missing

data (shown in italics and then given a calendar. The data also shows a significant increase in the

number of acute sleep stories from Poland and Eritrea (each representative of approximately one of

the top 10 sleeping products awkward signed 2007/08) and Eastern European (EEC) mountain and

mountain hikers, who banned Poland, remained around 5 percent of all early gliders in London

between 2006/07 and 2007/08 (Bell, et al., 2018).

Conclusion

Employees and staff at the time of sudden bed rest encompass the needs of the customer and

the institutional history of KETTA. Examination of these CURRENT data and increasingly

extensive documentation experiments show that reported REPORTS are reliably comparable to

substance abuse, but can reduce psychological well-being problems.6 It should be considered

emotionally good to be a generally accepted practice of a recognized practice. the reported

problem; In reality, the problem of obtaining a diagnosis of perceived emotional well-being is the

problem that employees have with external teams.

 Research Methods 10

References

Bell, E., Bryman, A. and Harley, B., 2018. Business research methods. Oxford university press.

Bryman, A., 2016. Social research methods. Oxford university press.

Ghauri, P., Grønhaug, K. and Strange, R., 2020. Research methods in business studies. Cambridge

University Press.

Hennink, M., Hutter, I. and Bailey, A., 2020. Qualitative research methods. SAGE Publications

Limited.

Lune, H. and Berg, B.L., 2016. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson

Higher Ed.

O'Sullivan, E., Rassel, G., Maureen, B. and Taliaferro, J.D., 2016. Research methods for public

administrators. Taylor & Francis.

Smith, M., 2019. Research methods in accounting. SAGE Publications Limited.

Tracy, S.J., 2019. Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis,

communicating impact. John Wiley & Sons.

Veal, A.J., 2017. Research methods for leisure and tourism. Pearson UK.