Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ISSUE –
The CORONA crime of the Centuries
* Gerrit, you use the terminology “The CORONA crime of the Centuries ” did you mean century?
**#** INSPECTOR-RIKATI®, in my view never in any century has such a crime been
perpetrated all over the world. This has in my view been a deliberate conduct by politicians of all
kinds to try to install a NEW WORLD ORDER and to get rid of cash transactions, and make
electronic monitoring part of daily life. Just that from onset I became aware about the COVID-19
I commenced to research it and it became clear to me this was an elaborate con-job to rob people
around the world of their freedoms in various ways.
As I made previously very clear: “this “new Magna Charta” is our Commonwealth of Australia
Constitution Act 1900 (UK) and as the States within Section 106 of the constitution are created
“subject to this constitution” then the States are bound by the legal principles embedded in this
“new Magna Charta”.”
It is not for politicians of whatever political party to get together and undermine out
constitutional rights to suit their own agenda. We must resist this, and hold each and every
politician legally liable for their treasonous conduct.
According to a website the following is to be considered:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-crimes-against-humanity-the-german-corona-
investigation/5725795?fbclid=IwAR1tLjxajK5zHlVCibQc7BoRqObFC_QNn7mv7no7ZgnwMf
SPxzCata0lcF8
QUOTE
Video: “Crimes Against Humanity”: The German Corona Investigation. “The PCR Pandemic”
Full Transcript
By Reiner Fuellmich
Global Research, October 07, 2020
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich 3 October 2020
The German Corona Investigative Committee has taken testimony from a large number of international
scientists and experts since July 10, 2020.
Scroll down for the Video and Full Transcript of Dr. Reiner Fuellmich‘s presentation.
END QUOTE
https://healthandmoneynews.wordpress.com/2020/10/09/brain-damage-from-masks-cannot-be-reversed/
QUOTE
Health and Money News
Your Health and the paper (debt) we view as money.
Brain Damage From Masks CANNOT BE REVERSED
END QUOTE
https://healthandmoneynews.wordpress.com/2020/10/09/brain-damage-from-masks-cannot-be-reversed/
QUOTE
Dr. Margarite Griesz-Brisson MD, PhD is a Consultant Neurologist and Neurophysiologist with a PhD in
Pharmacology, with special interest in neurotoxicology, environmental medicine, neuroregeneration and
neuroplasticity. This is what she has to say about masks and their effects on our brains:
“The rebreathing of our exhaled air will without a doubt create oxygen deficiency and a flooding of
carbon dioxide. We know that the human brain is very sensitive to oxygen depravation. There are
nerve cells for example in the hippocampus, that can’t be longer than 3 minutes without oxygen – they
cannot survive. The acute warning symptoms are headaches, drowsiness, dizziness, issues in
concentration, slowing down of the reaction time – reactions of the cognitive system.
However, when you have chronic oxygen depravation, all of those symptoms disappear, because you
get used to it. But your efficiency will remain impaired and the undersupply of oxygen in your brain
continues to progress.
We know that neurodegenerative diseases take years to decades to develop. If today you forget your phone
number, the breakdown in your brain would have already started 20 or 30 years ago.
While you’re thinking, that you have gotten used to wearing your mask and rebreathing your own
exhaled air, the degenerative processes in your brain are getting amplified as your oxygen deprivation
continues.
[..]I do not wear a mask, I need my brain to think. I want to have a clear head when I deal with my patients,
and not be in a carbon dioxide induced anaesthesia.
[..]There is no unfounded medical exemption from face masks because oxygen deprivation is dangerous
for every single brain. It must be the free decision of every human being whether they want to wear
a mask that is absolutely ineffective to protect themselves from a virus.
END QUOTE
This has been one gigantic worldwide con and it showed that politicians of any colour were
going along to unconstitutionally in Australia to implement a NEW WORLD ORDER and we
need to hold them all legally accountable. No excuse about that they didn’t know or relied upon
expert advise.
QUOTE Padfield v Minister of Agriculture & Fisheries and Food (1968) AC 997 (1968) 1 ALL ER 694 House
of Lords - Lord Upjohn and Lord Hodson Upjohn: - (Irrelevant consideration)
Here let it be said at once, he and his advisers have obviously given a bona fide and
painstaking consideration to the complaints addressed to him; the question is whether the
consideration was sufficient in law.
END QUOTE
In my view Prime Minister Scott Morrison, and all and any of the Premiers, as well as Ministers
for Health for starters all should be serving a long spell in imprisonment for what they inflicted
upon Australians in general.
The following will also make clear that the Framers of the Constitution intended to have CIVIL
RIGHTS and LIBERTIES principles embedded in the Constitution;
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
Australasian Convention)
QUOTE Mr. CLARK.-
the protection of certain fundamental rights and liberties which every individual citizen is entitled to
claim that the federal government shall take under its protection and secure to him.
END QUOTE
Mr. GORDON.-There will be more than one sentry. In the case of a federal law, every member of a
state Parliament will be a sentry, and, every constituent of a state Parliament will be a sentry.
As regards a law passed by a state, every man in the Federal Parliament will be a sentry, and the whole
constituency behind the Federal Parliament will be a sentry.
END QUOTE
Those who defied our constitutional, human, common law and other legal rights must be held
legally accountable as to avoid others to ever again to follow their footsteps.
* Will Premier Daniel Andrews not claim he relied upon advice of his Chief Health Officer to
excuse himself?
**#** Well he made clear anyone violating the law must accept the consequences. Also that
reportedly he stated:
Well I got news for him and every other politicians pursuing this mantra, that it is all about
human rights that we ended up having a constitution to protect our basic human rights.
This is why we elect politicians to represent us in the Parliament and where they fail to place our
human rights before their own selfish personal interest then they must be held legally
accountable.
* Surely you cannot blame PM Scott Morrison for what some Premier did?
**#** Why not, after all the Commonwealth has its Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth) and the Prime
minister and the Federal Minister for health should have made clear to any State that they were
bound to act within those provisions and not despite of it. Also that no one can override the
constitution. That is what each and every politicians is to pursue but we had some talking heads
in opposition but not a single one of them actually instituted legal proceedings against any of the
violations because they are just interested in political gain.
* How is your case going?
**#** As expected the Registrar is in my view obstructing the administration of justice and well
I made an official complaint in that regard considering also the provisions of the Crimes Act
(Cth).
* I understand you do not watch television so how do you get your information.
**#** Besides doing internet research, I got a bunch of people who provide me very important
links, and to me they are the kind of Sentries the Framers of the Constitution referred to. We all
have certain skills and as long as we can individually work together to contributed to each
persons ability then that is what I view is very important. That is what teamwork is about.
*.If all the restrictions were to be lifted would that not undermine your success in litigation?
**#** Not at all, as what I am pursuing will be relevant regardless of any restrictions being in
place or not. My aim is to RECLAIM our constitutional and other legal rights, that we have our
constitution not just as some framework but have politicians actually working within the confines
of the true meaning and application of the constitution. Likewise so, the High Court of Australia.
*. Are you indicating the High Court of Australia doesn’t do so?
**#** In my view it scandalously operate far too often in violation of the true meaning and
application of the constitution and that needs to be addressed also. Without a proper functioning
administration of justice it is unlikely that we can resolve the abuse and misuse of power by
politicians, and so I for one so to say am taking on the administration of justice to expose their
misuse and abuse of judicial powers. Anyone who is a true “sentry” will be on my side to ensure
this is appropriately addressed.
We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.