Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Yaip K Telue
BEng, BEng(Hons2A), PhD(QUT)
MIE(Aust), MIE(PNG)
Week Topics (Please indicate the Depth to be Continuous Learning Objectives to be achieved Perform.
achieved) Assessment alert +
Quiz Assign Tests 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 Introd’n, History, material prop, √ √
applic’ns, Limit State Concepts
2 Ultimate Bending Capacity, Over and 1 √ √
under reinforced and balanced
conditions
3 Bending Capacity T Beams and Design 2 √ √
of Rectangular and T Beams
4 Design of General Shape Beams Test √ √ Alert 1
5 Doubly Reinforced Concrete Beams 1 √ √
6 Shear 3 √ √
7 Shear √ √
Study Break
8 Detailing, Development length of steel √ √ Alert 2
reinforcement
9 Columns: introduction, axial load, √ √
plastic centroids 4
10 Columns: interaction diagrams, Test √ √
strength reduction factors slenderness 2
effects, moment magnification
11 Columns: Design: - Design Charts, √ √
Preliminary sizing, detail
considerations, bi-axial bending
12 Deflections √ √ Alert 3
13 Deflections √ √
Key:
* 1- Knowledge 2- Comprehension 3- Application 4 – Analysis
5- Synthesis 6 - Evaluation
2
LECTURE PLAN
(a) Textbook:
YK Telue (2011), Limit State Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures in PNG, Department of Civil Engineering, PNG University of
Technology ISBN 9980-56-014-2
Warner, Rangan, Hall and Faulkes (1999 or Latest edition), Concrete Structures, Addison Wesley Longman Australia Pty Ltd, South
Melbourne. ISBN = 0 582 80247 4
2 x tests 7%
4 x Assignments 6%
3
4
INTRODUCTION: REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN
1.0 INTRODUCTION
5
STANDARD SECTION AND PLATES
Figure 1-1: Typical RC Building Components. (From Reinforcement Detailing Handbook (ACI,
1989))
6
STRESS-STRAIN RELATIONSHIP
1.1 General
Reinforced concrete:- consists of steel reinforcement (bars or fabric) embedded in concrete.
Concrete is a mixture of cement, water, sand, gravel (aggregates), fly ash and admixtures
Reinforcement Steel comes in two grades (grade 250 or R bars and Grade 500 or N bars), various sizes (R10, R12,
R16, R20 etc), usually the bars are round.
Table Error! No text of specified style in document.-1: Comparison of Steel and Concrete
CONCRETE STEEL
o Cheap (material are readily and o Expensive
locally available
o Cast to any shape o Fabricate
o Durable-When done correctly o Protect from corrosion
o Medium Compressive strength and o High Tensile Strength
low tensile strength
o Brittle o Ductile
o
o
7
LIMIT STATE DESIGN
When we add 1-2% tension reinforcement to concrete, there is a dramatic increase in strength.
Concept:
o Use concrete in compression zones
o Use steel reinforcement where tension will occur in concrete members.
Reinforced Concrete:
o Limitless applications
o Columns
o Beams
o Slabs
o Shells
o Tanks (water retaining)
o Offshore Oil Platforms
o Canoes
8
It is good practice to provide steel reinforcement where tension may occur.
o Direct tension forces
o Bending
o Shear
o Torsion
o Bursting forces
9
1.4 Material Properties
Compressive Strength
10
Indirect Tensile Strength
Shrinkage: As Concrete dries its volume changes Time dependant. Shrinkage strain vary 600 x 10–6
to 1500 x 10-6.
Creep: Under load concrete continues to deform. May be 2 to 3 times the initial deformation.
11
1.1 Limit State Design
Overturning
Sliding
Uplift
2. Strength:
Bending
Shear
Axial loads
Torsion
Bearing
12
1. Serviceability:
Deflection
Cracking
Vibration
Lateral drift
2. Durability:
Concrete durability
Corrosion of reinforcement
3. Fire Resistance:
4. Other:
Fatigue
13
1.5.2 Risk of Failure
Design for Strength:
Probabilistic approach to design to ensure “acceptable” risk of failure. This can be based on experience
or statistics.
S* Ru
Design Action Effect (M*, V*) < Strength Reduction Factor X Ultimate Strength.
14
LIMIT STATE DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
Figure 1-5:Relationship between action effects and resistance/capacity- From Steel Designers Handbook
(Gorenc et al, 2007)
More comprehensive discussions of the limit state philosophies are covered in the Steel Designers Handbook by
Gorenc, Tinoyu and Syam (2005) and Concrete Structures by Warner, Rangan, Hall and Faulkes (1998).
Students are encouraged to consult these references to gain more understanding on the limit state design
philosophy.
15
1.5.3 Strength Reduction Factors ()
Table 1-2: Strength Reduction Factors
Type of Action AS 3600 2003-(Table 2.3) PNGS 1002 1982 (Table 13.2.1)
Bending 0.8 0.9
Shear 0.7 0.85
Axial compression + bending Varies from 0.6 to 0.8 Varies from 0.7 to 0.9
16
1.5.4 Load Factors
Design for worse case of:
Table 1-3: Load Factors
AS 3600 PNGS 1002
Note: If you use AS 3600 Load Factors to combine the Loads then you must use AS 3600 Capacity
reduction factors to reduce the resistance provided by the member. The same also applies to using PNGS
load combinations and Capacity reduction factors.
17
TUTORIAL PROBLEMS
18