Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Ben,
Regretfully my various writings have not achieved the result I was seeking to obtain as to
have EX PARTE INTERIM ORDERS that could assist me to file my material according to the
requirements of the Rules of the Court. I view that you are obstructing the administration of
10 justice and so on 16 October 2020 filed a complaint with Keifel CJ with the relevant references
that you ought to be charged for obstruction of the administration of justice.
While you may seek to prevent the correspondence to be provided to Keifel CJ I view this could
only add to further legal issues against you.
I suggest you consider: R v Rogerson [1992] HCA 25; (1992) 174 CLR 268; (1992) 60 A Crim
15 R 429 (17 June 1992)
Also:
PRIVATE PROSECUTION
The right of a private individual to institute a prosecution for a breach of the Law has been said to be
“A valuable constitutional safeguard against inertia or partiality on the part of authority" – Lord Wilberforce
"a useful constitutional safeguard against capricious, corrupt or biased failure or refusal of [the] authorities to prosecute offenders
against the criminal law". - Lord Diplock
As recently as 2006, Lord Mance stated that the right is "a safeguard against wrongful refusal or failure by prosecuting authorities to
institute proceedings".
Millions of persons in Victoria are suffering, which I view could have been prevented to some
extend in the interim had you not obstructed my lodged documentation to be placed before a
judge. In my view, there can be no excuse for this whatsoever. Hence, I view that Keifel CJ now
must deal with this matter and have you charged, etc.
30
This document is not intended and neither must be perceived to refer to all details/issues.