Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
M
Contract No. W-7405-eng-92
by
R. C. Crooks
R. Q. Wilson
A. E. Bearse
R. B. Filbert, Jr.
F e b r u a r y 9, 1955
Page
ABSTRACT 1
INTRODUCTION 1
E x p e r i m e n t a l Work 2
Results and Discussion 4
Conclusions 15
E x p e r i m e n t a l Work 18
Results and Discussion 20
Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
SUMMARY 36
REFERENCES 36
- / -
COMPOSITION OF VAPORS FROM
BOILING NITRIC ACID SOLUTIONS
.-]
INTRODUCTION
E x p e r i m e n t a l Work
Apparatus
Analytical Method
Procedure
Samples were taken f r o m the draw-off connections on the still and the
condensate r e c e i v e r d i r e c t l y into 6 0 - m l g l a s s - s t o p p e r e d dropper b o t t l e s .
Check e x p e r i m e n t s showed that no significant change in composition by s e l e c -
tive vaporization o c c u r r e d with this method of sampling.
R e s u l t s and D i s c u s s i o n
Liquid-Vapor E q u i l i b r i u m Data
yi ^ ^ y2 p
•y1 = X
—= p « , and 72 = X— P ° >
1 1 2 2
where
-y = activity coefficient
x = mole fraction in liquid
y = mole fraction in vapor
P = total p r e s s u r e
P" = vapor p r e s s u r e of pure component
Subscript 1 = H2O
Subscript 2 = HNO3.
120 240
Heat Input,w
Activity Coefficient
Concentration of HNO3
Tennperature, x^. Mole F r a c t i o n y-y^ Mole F r a c t i o n for for
C in Liquid in Vapor HoO HNO3
66.46 0 0 1.000 —
67.13 0.0166 0.000095 0.986 0.00272
67.96 0.0315 0.000228 0.966 0.00338
68.76 0.0466 0.000699 0.947 0.00682
68.84 0.0488 0.000940 0.941 0.00875
69.77 0.0631 0.001061 0.922 0.00737
70.98 0.0820 0.002180 0.892 0.01119
72.69 0.1075 0.00540 0.850 0.0203
74.91 0.1374 0.01167 0.796 0.0316
76.62 0.1606 0.0201 0.755 0.0440
77.88 0.1830 0.0335 0.726 0.0621
80.88 0.2212 0.0644 0.653 0.0909
82.95 0.2554 0.1082 0.599 0.1248
84.73 0.2979 0.1831 0.542 0.1721
86.18 0. 3440 0.2928 0.475 0.228
36.38 0.3850 0.4122 0.418 0.287
0.20 030 0.40
HNO , mole fraction
/ ^
,/=«
/
HNC'3
/
/^
f
a. a.
x" 4
II
/
c
0)
0) /
o f
o
/
o 0.010
«
41'
r
0.001
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
Mole Fraction HNOg in L i q u i d , x g
Molar
Activity Coefficient Distribution
C o n c e n t r a t i o n of HNO3 7j, 72, R a t i o , K, for
Temperature, X T . Mole F r a c t i o n y^^ Mole F r a c t i o n for for HNO^,
C in L i q u i d in V a p o r H2O HNO3 (K = y2 /X2)
log 7 ,
iSi * ^,
(l-xj)
Evaluation of Data
Both the equilibrium data of this work and those of Taylor were found
to be t h e r m o d y n a m i c a l l y consistent when checked by the Gibbs-Duhem e q u a -
tion. The usual f o r m of the equation.
= xi
In -Y,
7i == -- // —^—
-—- d^ in
In 72,
10.0 1
1.0
jy ^^•"^
^|x~
II V^
f^
a
r ^
X
A^
c
o 0.1 urve from smoothe d values
/<^
CO
,y
;^
O
OJ
o
/
c
O
Z
n
oA (D Experimental v alues ~1
A Calculated fron1 values cif Taylor
X
001
yo
0.001
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 035 0.40
Mole Fraction HNO, In Liquid,x.
1.0
^ ^
k^
r^
Ol X
^
/ ^
V
_y
CM
>« /^
o
o. /
o aoi /
>
1 /
F
O
Z Curve from sm oothed v(nlues
X /
c
o
u 0.001 /
o Y/
L _^
o
0.000!
\
00000!
ao5 0.10 0.15 020 025 0.30 0.35 0.40
Mole Fraction HNO^in Liquid, Xg
FIGURE 5. VAPOR COMPOSITIONS OVER BOILING AQUEOUS NITRIC ACID SOLUTIONS
AT 2 0 0 MM MERCURY
A-13692
13
0.0005
0.0000
0.01 0.02 0.03 0X)4
Mole Fraction HNO3 in Liquid,Xg
FIGURE 6. EQUILIBRIUM DIAGRAM FOR DILUTE SOLUTIONS OF NITRIC ACID IN
WATER AT 200 MM MERCURY
A-13693
14
-2.8
-2.4
OJ
X
-08
o
.M
-2.0 g«
I I
II o
car •*-
c
o
X u
-1.6 c
c U.
o
3 -04- ••-
u
UL
<
-1.2
<
-02
-as
-QC-
± ± _L
0 OIO 020 030 0.40
Mole Fraction HNOjin Liquid, Xg
In
\
a.-> =
/^ ^l"^ r ] f^r'
^°^\—J =-[''2 ^1 ^2 -°^i ^1 ^2 J - J x i ' °^2^^1-
In this work, the " p r i m e " quantities refer to the azeotrope composition, and
the " d o u b l e - p r i m e " quantities r e f e r to n i t r i c acid concentrations between
the azeotrope and pure w a t e r .
Conclusions
1.0
OS
0.4
0.10 0.20 030 0.40
Mole Fraction Nitric Acid in Liquid ,Xg
FIGURE 8. ACTIVITY COEFFICIENT OF HgO IN NITRIC ACID SOLUTIONS AT 2 0 0 MM MERCURY
A- 1 3 6 9 5
I i
17
c
0)
.2 0.7 -
0)
o
O
>s
• * -
'>
• * -
U
<
E x p e r i m e n t a l Work
Apparatus
Analytical Methods
Procedure
• Caution: Concentrated nitric acid may react with ethanol to form ethyl nitrate which is highly explosive.
20
R e s u l t s and D i s c u s s i o n
Total Chloride in
Distillation
Molar Apparatus Chloride
Concentration of HNO3 Concentration of Chloride Distribution Charged Found Recovered
''HNOS yHN03 ''C1-. Vci-. Ratio of Duration of Before After Per Cent of
r
Temperature, Pressure, mm Mole Fraction Mole Fraction Mole Fraction Mole Fraction _, Chloride, Boiling, Boiling, Boiling, Cl-in
Run C mercury in Liquid in Vapor in Liquid x 10^ in Vapor x 10^ mg mg Charge
\ Cl
1 66.2 199.0 0.0000 0.0000 181. 0,83 0.0046 2.2 75.0 75.7 101
2 66.9 200.0 0.0292 0.000273 193. 1.08 0.0056 1.3 78.6 79.5 101
3 68.6 198.7 0.0588 0.000945 187. 5.50 0.0294 1.0 82.3 76.9 94
4 72.3 198.5 0.1038 0.00312 198. 33.2 0.167 1.0 86.5 81.0 94
M
5 75.9 200.2 0.1528 0.01860 184. 215. 1.17 0.8 91.1 85.1 93
6 79.0 197.0 0.2020 0.0489 98.5 563. 5.72 0.9 96.0 77.2 80
7 83.6 198.0 0.283 0.1580 15.2 746. 49.1 1.0 102.0 56.2 55
8 85.6 199.0 0.362 0.394 2.6(^) 1.6(a) -- (^) 1.0 105.0 0.96 0.9
9 72.0 197.0 0.1063 0.00515 212. 32.2 0.152 0.8 86.4 84.9 98
10 83.1 199.0 0.284 0.1670 54.3 4990. 91.9 0.5 678. 347. 51
11 83.7 198.0 0.285 0.1620 6.84 312. 45.6 0.5 20.4 23.7 116 (b)
12 76.3 202.0 0.1565 0.0211 1270. 1052. 0.829 0.8 607. 550. 90
13 75.9 200,0 0.1528 0.0173 29.4 40.0 1.36 0.9 6.08 14.0 230 (b)
14 75.9 200.0 0.1510 0.0204 12.3 16.6 1.35 1.5 6.0 5.8 97
15 69.0 200.0 0.0545 0.00069 1160. 25.6 0.0222 0.8 550. 477. 87
16 66.4 .200.4 0.0011 0.000005 1110. 5.48 0.0049 0.8 507, 462, 91
o o
>»|K
II
_o
x:
O
•«-
o
o
o
3
jQ
(A
000!
0 0.05 010
Acidity, mole fraction HNO3
FIGURE 10. DISTRIBUTION RATIO OF CHLORIDE IN NITRIC ACID SOLUTIONS
BOILING AT 2 0 0 MM MERCURY
A- 1 3 6 9 7
24
100
u o
II
<U
w
O
o
<*•
o
o
Q:
v>
O
o
o
0.001
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
A c i d i t y , mole fraction HNO3
FIGURE II. EFFECT OF PRESSURE ON THE DISTRIBUTION RATIO OF CHLORIDE
IN BOILING NITRIC ACID SOLUTIONS
A-l 3 6 9 6
25
too
/ y
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
10 /
/
1 3 0 ^ - + ^ ^^
2,V / "^
o >^ / ***^
X X
X / / K-».|atx = l
II
/ /
^ / /
to/ /
CJ
X
••- ^ ' ! 3.127 mole fraction HCl =22.8 V o HCl.
o «r20/4?A°"0^''0P® #
o
c /c^V
o
3 # /
•-
-^/'V.S*^
.2
Q #+/^
/ Am— Curve fromFigure 10
o
o /
/
/ f
6//
0.01 / /
/ ' 1
/ /
oA + Points calculated from partial.
2 // pressure values of Zeisberg»'.
Figures indicate weight per cent
HCl in 1Iquid.
0.001
0 0.05 0. 0 0. 5 0 20 0. 25 0.30
Acidity, mole fraction HCl or HNO3
FIGURE 12. DISTRIBUTION RATIO OF CHLORIDE AS HCl IN BOILING AQUEOUS
HYDROCHLORIC ACID SOLUTIONS AT SELECTED^OILING TEMPERATURES
Boiling temperature has some value as for nitric acid solutions of equivalent
acidity and boiling under 200 mm mercury total pressure.
A-13699
26
Conclusions
Determination of Chloride
Calibration Curve
A 1 ^o n ^iQ /-O. 8 4 7
A = log = 0, 418 C ,
where,
A = absorbance
I = intensity of incident light (450 mjj.)
I = intensity of t r a n s m i t t e d light
C = concentration of chloride in mg per l i t e r .
i.O
^
/
^ i
f
/
/
/
V
/
a>
u
c /
o 0.1
ja
y^ Age of suspension 2 0 min
o(Ak.
/ 1 Concentration of ethanol 25 volume per cen1
<
Coneentrationof HNO3 0.65 N
/ L'gh f wavelength 4 5 0 m 1IL
Y ^
Slit width
Refe rence at lOOper cent
0.28rr m 1
Distille d water
^ trcmsmission
0.01
I 10 100
Concentration of Chloride, mg chloride per liter
Analytical P r o c e d u r e
/(mg CI
^1-/1 1 \ = *—a
/kg sample) (mg C l ~ :/ l i t e r suspension)
£ L I( 50
(density of sample) \ m l sample
Spectral Transmission
* Caution: Concentrated nitric acid may react with ethanol to form ethyl nitrate which is highly explosive.
31
04
0.3
u
c
o 0.2
o
«A
<
0.1
0.0 ± ± ± ± _L ±
300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Wavelength, m/i
FIGURE 14. EFFECT OF WAVELENGTH UPON ABSORBANCE OF A SILVER
CHLORIDE SUSPENSION
A - I 3701
32
0.60
aoo3 N
0.50
0)
u
c
o a4o
o
030 -
o 0.003 N HNO3
o 0.10 N HNO3
< 0 2 0 N HNO3
n 0.50 N HNO3
> 2.0 N HNO3
A 5.0 N HNO3
V 11.7 N HNO3
0.20 J. J.
10 20 30 40 50
Time After Precipitation of Silver Chloride,min
FIGURE 15. EFFECT OF NITRIC ACID CONCENTRATION UPON THE AGING CHARAC-
TERISTICS OF SILVER CHLORIDE SUSPENSIONS IN AQUEOUS NITRIC
ACID SOLUTIONS
A- 1 3 7 0 2
33
Conclusions
050
0*
0 percent alcohol
u
c
o
o
w
<
0.30
0.20'--
10 20 30 40
Time After Precipitation of Silver Chloride,min
FIGURE 16. EFFECT OF ETHYL ALCOHOL UPON THE AGING CHARACTERISTICS
OF SILVER CHLORIDE SUSPENSIONS IN DILUTE NITRIC ACID
SOLUTIONS
A-l 3 703
36
aeo
Chloride content,20 mg per liter
Ethanol, 25 volume per cent
4 5 0 m^
0.1 N HNO3
u
c 0.65JiHN03
0)
•^ 0.50 2.5 N HNO3
o
M
<
5.ONHNO3
0.40 ± ± I ±
0 10 20 30 40
Time After Precipitation of Silver Chloride, min
FIGURE 17 EFFECT OF NITRIC ACID CONCENTRATION UPON THE AGING
CHARACTERISTICS OF SILVER CHLORIDE SUSPENSIONS IN
DILUTE ETHYL ALCOHOL SOLUTIONS
A - I 3 704
36
SUMMARY
REFERENCES
RCC:RQW:AEB:RBF/kl
J-JI RNJ
/ -