Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Satender son of Sultan Singh, residents of village Kalba, PS Nangal Chaudhary, District
Mahendargarh, Haryana.
…Accused/Petitioner
Versus
State Of Haryana
…Accused/Petitioner
Dated – 16/09/2020
Hon’ble Sir,
1. That a false case has been got registered by the complainant in collusion with police
Cr.P.C. in the Hon’ble Court of Ld. Area Magistrate, Narnaul and the same was
dismissed on merit.
3. That the perusal of the facts collected so far in the course of investigation reveals that
no offence u/s 379B is made out because if the case of the prosecution is taken on the
snatch any article like vehicle or mobile phone or any other article and prima facie
4. That in this case the complainant party is the aggressor. The accused petitioner
Satender had deployed the JCB machine for leveling the ground situated near the main
road and the complainant party, who claim themselves to be the officers of forest
department, by chance came there and all of a sudden they started grappling with the
driver of the JCB machine and thereafter, with accused Satender and they further tried
to take him away with them by putting him forcibly in their vehicle. Then the farmers
who were working in the nearby fields rushed to the spot in order to rescue Satender
Singh and in this process when the complainant employees were trying to run away,
they might have sustained some injuries and the petitioner had not caused any injury
5. That the accused/petitioner is sarpanch of village Gram Sarpanch Village Kalba and has
deep roots in the society and has agriculture land in the village. All the witnesses are
officials of forest department and police personal and as such there is no possibility of
very chances that the conclusion of trial and final decision of the case may take
7. That the complaint party being government officials by misuse of their post, got
registered a false case against the accused/petitioner and the police also did not
8. That the accused/petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation and no
useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars.
9. That the petitioner has deep roots in the society and therefore, there is no
10. That petitioner is ready to give sound surety and furnish the bond as per the orders of
11. That the petitioner is a law abiding person and therefore, there is no apprehension of
petitioner.
12. That the petitioner shall appear before the Hon’ble Court as and when ordered by the
court.
13. That the petitioner shall abide by all the terms and conditions to be imposed by the
may kindly be allowed and petitioner may please be released on bail and in the alternative
it is further submitted that looking into the present scenario arising due to the COVID-19
pandemic any other appropriate relief which the Hon’ble court deems appropriate may
kindly be granted.
Date:
Submitted by:
Through counsel