Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
)
1.Subjective & objective grammar. Inner division of grammar
When we speak of grammar as a part of a language it will be objectivegrammar.
When we speak of grammar as a course or book it will be subjective grammar.
The second is only the reflexion of the first. This distinction become clear when we try to answer the
question how many grammar?
When we speak of objective grammar, the answer is only - one, but when subjunctive-many and different.
There are different types of books and courses in grammar:1.primary grammar for beginners 2.advanced
grammar for students 3.comparative or typological grammar. 4.Historical grammar as a part of history of
certain language. 5.General grammarians a part of theoretical linguistics. 6. Theoretical grammar of a certain
language.
There are some approaches of grammar studies such as:descriptive gramm.,prescriptive
gramm.,transformational gramm.,generative gramm.,contrastive gramm.
Inner division of grammar.
Formally there have a tradition to include into grammar only grammar issues but questions concerning
phonology, word-building and composition.
But there was also a tendency to dissolve morphology into syntax. But nowadays grammarians separate
morphology from syntax.
Aristotle put adjectives among the verbs. Both Plato and Aristotle’s parts of speech were parts of
sentences. Words became nouns, verbs or conjunctions only were put in sentences.
Their major theoretical achievements was distinguishing a case which was the fundamental distinction
between nouns and verbs.
They drew the borderline between pronouns and article on the one hand and the prepositions and
conjunctions on the other.
20.Aspectual phrases
Examples:
My duty as a coach is to teach skills. (infinitive phrase functions as a noun)
32. The essential feature of the sentence. The problem of sentence definition.
A sentence is a unit of speech whose grammatical structure conforms to the laws of the language and which
serves as the chief means of conveying a thought. A sentence is not only a means of communicating
something about reality but a means of showing the speaker’s attitude to it.
It is rather difficult to define the sentence as it is connected with many lingual and extra lingual aspects –
logical, psychological and philosophical. We will just stick to one of them - according to academician
G.Pocheptsov, the sentence is the central syntactic construction used as the minimal communicative unit that
has its primary predication, actualises a definite structural scheme and possesses definite intonation
characteristics.
The most essential features of the sentence as a linguistic unit are a) its structural characteristics – subject-
predicate relations (primary predication), and b) its semantic characteristics – it refers to some fact in the
objective reality.
The subject shows who or what is doing the action. It is always some form of noun or pronoun.
The verb shows the action or the state of being. It can be an action verb, like “run,” or a state verb, like
“seem.”
Examples of simple two word sentences include. Marvin slept. Dogs bark.
Real sentences are rarely so short. We usually want to convey much more information, so we modify the
main subject and verb with other words and phrases, as in the sentences below: Unfortunately, Marvin slept
fitfully. Dogs bark louder after midnight.
Despite the extra information, each of these sentences has one subject and one verb, so it’s still just one
clause. What’s a clause?
A clause is the combination of a subject and a verb.
Four Basic Patterns
Every sentence pattern below describes a different way to combine clauses. When you are drafting your own
papers or when you’re revising them for sentence variety, try to determine how many of these patterns you
use. If you favor one particular pattern, your writing might be kind of boring if every sentence has exactly
the same pattern. If you find this is true, try to revise a few sentences using a different pattern.
NOTE: Because nouns can fill so many positions in a sentence, it’s easier to analyze sentence patterns if you
find the verbs and find the connectors. The most common connectors are listed below with the sentence
patterns that use them.
In the descriptions below, S=Subject and V=Verb, and options for arranging the clauses in each sentence
pattern given in parentheses. Connecting words and the associated punctuation are highlighted in brown.
Notice how the punctuation changes with each arrangement.
Pattern 1: Simple Sentence
One independent clause (SV.)
Mr. Potato Head eats monkeys.
I refuse.
Try this: Look for sentences in your own text that have only one clause. Mark them with a certain color so
they stand out.
Pattern 2: Compound Sentence
Two or more independent clauses. They can be arranged in these ways: (SV, and SV.) or (SV; however,
SV.)
Connectors with a comma, the FANBOYS: for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so (See our handout on commas for
more info.)
Connectors with a semicolon and comma: however, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, therefore
Example compound sentences:
Mr Potato Head eats them for breakfast every day, but I don’t see the attraction.
Pattern 3: Complex Sentence
One independent clause PLUS one or more dependent clauses. They can be arranged in these ways: (SV
because SV.) or (Because SV, SV.) or (S, because SV, V.)
Connectors are always at the beginning of the dependent clause. They show how the dependent clause is
related to the independent clause. This list shows different types of relationships along with the connectors
that indicate those relationships:
Complex sentences are often more effective than compound sentences because a complex sentence indicates
clearer and more specific relationships between the main parts of the sentence. The word "before," for
instance, tells readers that one thing occurs before another. A word such as "although" conveys a more
complex relationship than a word such as "and" conveys.The classification of complex sentences is usually
based on the classification of subordinate clauses. Hence, there are distinguished the following typologically
relevant groups of subordinate clauses: subject clauses, predicative clauses , objective clauses , attributive
and adverbial clauses.
The categorial classification draws a parallel between subordinate clauses and parts of speech. According to
the categorial principle subordinate clauses are classed by their nominative properties, that is on their
analogy with the part-of- speech classification of notional words. From this point of view all subordinate
clauses are divided into 3 categorial groups.
The first group is formed by the substantive-nominal clauses. It includes clauses that name an event as a
certain fact. They are also called noun-clauses and are similar to the nominative function of a noun. Their
noun-like nature is easily revealed by substitution, e.g.: I thought up what we could do under the
circumstances. – the clause can be substituted by “the plan”- I thought up the plan.
The second group of clauses is called qualification-nominal or adjective clauses. They name an event as a
certain characteristic of another event. The adjective-like nature of these clauses can also be proved by
substitution, e.g. The man whom you saw in the hall was our client. – That man was our client; e.g.: Did you
find a room where we could hold a meeting? – Did you find such kind of room?
The third group of clauses can be called adverbial. They name an event as a dynamic characteristic of
another event. Adverbial clauses are best tested by transformations, e.g.: They will meet us half way if we
follow the agreement.- They will meet us half way on condition that we follow the agreement; e.g.: I could
hardly make up any plan, as I did not know the details.- I could hardly make up any plan for the reason that I
did not know the details.