Writing Test IELTS Practice

1. The pie chart gives information on UAE government spending in 2000. The
total budget was AED 315 billion.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting
the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150
words.

The given pie chart represents the share of the UAE government’s spending from a total
budget of 315 billion in 2000.

Overall, the UAE allocated the most share from its budget in Social Security (100 billion
AED) which is almost a third of its total allowance. UAE is really focusing on the safety
and security of its countrymen. Safety is the priority, then followed by Heath and
personal services (53 billion AED) which utilized one-sixth of the budget and education
(38 billion).

They have the same allowance for the expenditure and debt allowance and almost the
exact same with defense, only 1 billion difference.

Law and order utilized 17 billion AED, didn’t spend as much as Security because UAE
residents are well disciplined.
When it comes to Housing heritage and environmental, we cannot deny how beautiful
this country is. Every building head-turners, beautiful indoor park, amazing views, that is
why people kept coming back.

Industry, agriculture and employment and transport are included as well in the UAE with
enough budget, roughly 26 UAE billion.

Living in UAE feels like a pampered citizen. I can say that the King of each Emirates
does what they intend to do to make the countrymen’s life easier and provides good
environment.

2. Some systems require students to speacialize in a limited range of subjects

from the age of fifteen. Other systems require students to study a wide range of
subjects until they leave school? What are the benefits of two education systems and
what is better ?You should write at least 250 words.

We have to types of education system, one is that it requires the student to specialize in a
limited range of subject from the age of fifteen while the other is to study a wide range of
subjects until they leave school. This education system is actually very good, the students
can choose what they want, being in a limited range course or know more about what
they want and could be in the future. Of course, there are benefits of each education
system.

The benefit of the students who chose to specialize in a limited range of subject from the
age of fifteen is also known as a vocational course. This applies to some people who has
the eagerness to work at younger age to be able to help to change their standing of life
and that they can as well help their families in everyday expenses. They could also
focused and learn more about what they actually want to be without worrying their grades
in subjects unrelated with their future jobs.

When it comes to the system that requires a student to study a wide range of subject until
they leave school is a fulfilling one to those who dreamt to become professional. They
can be able to apply not only to their chosen profession but whichever they want to
become. The probability of changing the major or dream in the future is big, this
education system could help the students to expand more information about the faculty
and vocations that would be offered in college.

Between the two education systems, I would rather choose the one that requires to study a
wide range of subjects as it widens not only your knowledge but also your experiences in
life.

As post graduate high school student, i wouldn’t be able to decide what i want to take in
college if I didn’t complete the four year course. I supposed not to be here if I have taken
the vocational course. I wouldn’t explore more about the opportunities i can take in
college, the major i’m looking forward to and what i’m actually passionate in. And that, I
can say, head up high, that I succeeded to found out what i want to be, an engineer. I
believe that being an engineer, specifically Civil Engineering, is my calling.

3. British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and
2010

As we can see from the chart we have two types of information about the British people
giving money to charity by age range. It is divided into two years, 1990 and 2010.
In 1990, from several age groups, the people from age range 35 to 50 years has the most
money to charity, with 42%. Following by the age of 51 to 65, age over than 65 and then
the ones from age 26 to 35. There may be some reasons why people at those age range
could give money to charity at that quantity. Maybe at that time, 1990, people from the
age 35 to 50 is the most successful, therefore they give the most money to charity. The
following groups of age may be also effected by the income they receive from their work
or else. The least of money that was given to the charity is 17%, came from the people
age 18 to 25. It is understandable since some of the group just graduated high school or
collage which income is low or none.

There are also one other year to see, which is 2010. There are some difference compared
to 1990’s chart. The group of people who gave the most money to charity comes from the
age 51 to 65. Following by the ones from group age 36-50 and over than by, which have
the same amount of charity, which is 35 %. There is also age group from 26 to 35 which
is not the least nor the most, it is on the 24% of the charity percentage. The differences
lies in the group of age and the amount of charity that is given. There may be possibility
that people in the 2010, the age between 51 to 65 has the most income, or savings, or
maybe just goodness. It also explains why least of the charity was from the age of 18 to
25, same compared to 2010. That group of age may not have their own money yet to
actually make a donation.

The significant difference or comparison may be about the amount of the charity and the
age who gave charity to the community or others. The chart also explain about the
amount people who still wants to donate some of their savings of money, considering the
era may have changed a lot obviously will effect how the people think. The lack of
income because the level of competitiveness to succeed is higher than 20 years before
2010. But It is guaranteed that there must be other reasons from above which may effect
the difference amount or group position in a gap of 20 years.