Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
WM, Nagaland
d 2015
PGW
WM, Nagaland
d 2015
PGW
WM, Nagaland
d 2015
Tablle of Conten
nt
Acknowlledgement
Recomm
mendations ……………
………………
………………
……. 144
Way forw
ward ……………
………………
………………
…….. 155
Annexure ……………
………………
………………
……. 166 - 26
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
Acknowledgement
We acknowledged Dr. Ravi Chopra, Founder Director PSI, Mr.DebashishSen Director PSI,
Mr.MhathanYanthan, Director LRD&Mr. Albert Ngullie Deputy Director LRD for the consent,
approval & guidance for the successful programme. Our sincere gratitude to the Chief Guest
Mr.ImkonglembaAo (IAS), Agriculture Production Commissioner, Commissioner & Secretary
to the Government of Nagaland, Departments of Agriculture, Industries & Commerce, for
gracing the occasion & sharing insightful thoughts, concern and inputs on the First Day
Consultative Meeting. We deeply thankedArghyam (Bengaluru) for the financial support &
ACWADAM (Pune), RMDD (Sikkim), MBDA (Meghalaya), Land Resources Department,
Govt. of Nagaland, dignitaries, rapporteurs, delegates & well-wishers for the warm hospitality,
constant support, cooperation & valuable contribution &vigorousparticipation in the training
workshop.
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
Springs are essential component to water security for communities especially in the Himalayan
region for domestic purposes and irrigation, and thus are also vital to lifeline of rivulets, streams
and entire local ecosystems which directly link to Groundwater. Springs in the Himalayan region
represent a typology of ‘mountain perched aquifers’, with a large degree of variability and
complexity attributed by the geology, terrain and hydrological factors. These mountain springs
emanate from unconfined aquifers. Without a proper understanding of aquifers, any study of
groundwater remains incomplete. Study of springs, with a strong hydro geological context is
especially relevant and vital for conservation, protection and land-treatment measures in order to
adapt to various fluxes imposed by climate change and other factors.
Despite the mountainous terrain covered by rich diverse fauna and flora in North East and
receiving one of the highest rainfalls in the country with an average of 1500-2500 mm annually,
the depletion & deterioration of water resources (quality & quantity) is looming as the perennial
springs, streams and other water bodies are drying up or becoming seasonal. This becomes
jeopardy for the ecosystems, lives and livelihoods of the populace. India extracts the greatest
amount of groundwater in the world annually.1Ground water (GW) supplies nearly 55% of
irrigation, 85% of rural and 50% of urban and industrial water needs.2The amount of GW thus
extracted is often more than the annual recharge. Groundwater, an accessible open resource is the
life line of mountain communities and therefore springs & streams as its heritage, regenerating
them is critical.
Spring shed development can help enhance rainfall infiltration into the ground, recharge springs,
revive dysfunctional traditional water harvesting systems, moderate flood peaks and recharge
streams and rivers. In May 2012, the Union Ministry of Rural Development had notified spring
shed development works under MGNREGA. The revised IWMP of the ‘Common Guidelines
for Watershed Development Projects’ also mentioned the inclusion of the component of
hydrogeological studies in the DPRs. A rapid extension through PGWM approach is an urgent
need of the hour to address these concern practical issues in the Himalayan North Eastern States.
PSI has been working in the Himalayan region for more than two decades now promoting
Participatory watershed development as well as participatory Groundwater Management
(PGWM) practices for the efficient, sustainable and equitable use of local Groundwater
resources. Way back in 1996 it has been recognized as the nodal support voluntary organization
for watershed development by CAPART, MoRD, and New Delhi for the North Western
Himalayan region. Since 2008, the Institute has also assisted the Government of Sikkim to
initiate springshed development (through the Dhara Vikas program) in water scarce villages.
1
Planning COmmisssion (2010): Mid-term appraisal of the Eleventh Five-year Plan 2007-2012, Planning
Commission, GoI, New Delhi, URL:
http://www.planningcommission.gov.in/plans/mta/11th_mta/MTA.html
2
Planning Commission (2007): Report of the Expert Group on GW Management and Ownership, Planning
Commission, Government of India, New Delhi.
1
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
These interventions have regenerated springs and have led to an improvement in the availability
of water in the targeted villages.
The consultative meeting on 30th October 2015 and subsequent training workshop from October
31st to November 6th 2015, was organized to extend the Participatory Groundwater Management
(PGWM) approach in the North - East by Dehradun Voluntary based Organisation Peoples’
Science Institute. It is being co-funded and collaborated with Land Resources Department,
Government of Nagaland along with the support from Arghyam foundation, Bengaluru.
Objective:
The workshop was targeted to share experiences, explore and develop understanding about the
possibility & need of regenerating springs (identify recharge and enhance the recharge of
springs), streams and underground flows through community-led actions based on local hydro-
geology, focusing on issues of water quality, sustainability, and equity of groundwater as a
common pool resource in the North Eastern Himalayan region. It aimed to enhance and build
capacities of concerned government agencies and local Voluntary Sectors (VOs) based on the
regional needs and potential interventions. It is expected that the workshop will initiate and
contribute to the development of affective partnership, partnership among the different
stakeholders towards promoting PGWM as a common pool resource in the Himalayan North
East.
Chief Guest: Mr. Imkonglemba Ao (IAS), Agriculture Production Commissioner,
Commissioner & Secretary to the Government of Nagaland, Departments of Agriculture,
Industries & Commerce.
Chairpersons:
1. Dr. Ravi Chopra, Founder Director, PSI, Dehradun
2. Dr. DebashishSen, Director, PSI, Dehradun
3. Mr. Alan Gonmei (IAS), Chairman SLNA-IWMP &Secretary to the Govt. of Nagaland,
Land Resources Department, Nagaland
2
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
Resource Persons:
1. Dr. Ravi Chopra, Founder Director (PSI, Dehradun)
2. Mr. Debashish Sen, Director (PSI, Dehradun)
3. Mr. Rajesh Kumar (PSI, Dehradun)
4. Dr. Anil Gautam (PSI, Dehradun)
5. Mr. Mhathung Yanthan, CEO SLNA-IWMP & Director (Land Resources Department,
Government of Nagaland)
6. Mr. Kaustubh Mahamuni (ACWADAM, Pune)
7. Mr. Harshvardhan Dhawan (Arghyam, Bengaluru)
8. Mr. Pem Norbu Sherpa and Mr. KB Chettri (Rural Management & Development Dept.
(RMDD), Dhara Vikas Program, Sikkim)
9. Mr. Lam Shabong (Meghalaya Basin Development Authority (MBDA), Shillong)
Delegates:
The participatory training workshop comprises of the delegates from diverse background,
academic institutions, government agencies & voluntary sectors across the Himalayan States of
North-East working on groundwater related issues. The participants mainly include the Govt. of
Nagaland; Land Resources Dept., Public Health Engineering Dept. (PHED), Soil & Water
Conservation Dept., Geology & Mining Dept., Irrigation & Flood Control Dept., SLNA;
Manipur, Arunachal & Mizoram and Voluntary Organisations; NgunuZiro from Arunachal
Pradesh and Nagaland; North East Initiative Development Agency, Eleutheros Christian Society,
Nagaland Development Outreach (NBCC), Sustainable Development Forum Nagaland,
Prodigals Home and a student from Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS),Mumbai, GIZ
Nagaland. 47 delegates and 27 dignitaries & officials participated on the first day of the
consultative meeting & subsequent training included the 47 participants. Overall, 78 participants
attended the training workshop.
3
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
4
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
5
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
Highlights
6
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
• The major schemes focus of source development to access the groundwater/surface water and
distribution channels from source to supply the increasing demand. There is a need for
paradigm shift in resource development rather than source development.
• The management and conservation of GW resources are not considered in mainstream
watershed management and other government programmes.
• Need to move to valley to valley approach from conventional approach of ridge to valley
approach as groundwater occurrence crosses the watershed boundaries.
• There is lack of talent pool for a scientific understanding of occurrence of groundwater,
hydrogeology of Himalayan region, resource based planning and lack of community
participation in such planning.
• The lack of enough data on springs and wells and their yield in Himalayan region is another
critical constraint which is shrinking the opportunities for scientific understanding.
• Hence there is need of
o Research - To new levels, with possible experimentation of groundwater management
models.
o Training: Widening and deepening the understanding of hydrogeology and demystifying
the science.
o Data inventories – for springs, wells recharge, yields for better scientific understanding
o Dissemination of research and education in groundwater to wider audiences
o Scaling up the efforts
• Participatory groundwater management approach principally focuses on –
o Resource development considering groundwater as a common resource pool and aquifer
based groundwater management
o Participation of all the stakeholders in planning, implementation and monitoring
o The demand regulation at various levels
o Community-led systems for sustainable use of groundwater
o Institutional convergence for implementation and ensuring the sustainability of resources
7
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
8
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
Highlights
Topics covered & sessions: The mode of training was visual presentations, practical sessions,
field visits, documentary films, group work and discussions.
1.1 Class Room Sessions: The main topics covered during the class room sessions were:
• Water management in the Indian Himalayas – Overview, issues and policy remedies.
• Groundwater - its nature and importance
• Himalayan Geology (Earth formation, origin of Himalayas and types of rocks)
• Groundwater Science
o Types of aquifer and springs
o Recharge zones, dip, strike, yield etc.
o Hydrogeological relation with groundwater
• Springs regeneration works:
o Understanding the maps
o Designing of different structures for groundwater recharging
9
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
of the area.
The second field visit was organized on 3-4th November 2015 to Medziphema village, Dimapur.
The things which were understood by participants were:
1. Understanding types of springs and aquifer system
2. Building the understanding of underground geology based on various observations like –
slope, terrain, exposed geology, water quality parameters etc.
3. Use of maps – Toposheet and Google earth image for correlating the observations
4. Understanding the current demand and dependence on groundwater through social surveys
5. Recharge area demarcation for the wells and springs
6. Measurements – Slope, contour, yield, discharge etc.
7. Planning recharge generating structures
8. Method for water sample collection
9. Collection of water samples which were later tested in the classroom session.
Each group was also given a water quality testing kit so that they could analyse the water
samples collected by them during the field visit. The water quality parameters (pH, Hardness,
Faecal Coliform, Iron, TDS, and Chloride) were analysed to correlate the underlying aquifer
system and also sanitation problems.
10
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
11
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
The third field visit was to the various soil-water conservation structures constructed by DoLR in
the campus of resource centre. Mr. Rajesh Kumar explained the use of every structures and the
feasibility of various structures at various slopes. The structures observed were: Brushwood
check dam, contour trenches, Moon trenches made up of Bamboo, plantation, contour bund and
check dam.
12
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
13
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
Recommendations/Challenges
1. During the course of the training, the need for participatory springshed development was
realized by all concerned departments and representatives of respective states. All the States
(Government agencies/VOs) equivocally opined to have participatory springshed
development initiatives on pilot basis.
2. Given that Nagaland is coming up with water policy, it is an opportunity to incorporate the
participatory springshed development in the state level policy for long term water security.
3. Collective efforts and collaboration of stakeholder departments will be required to
comprehensive water security plan. The various departments have to integrate their schemes
and utilize the budgets appropriately for the resource development. As springshed
development needs very little investment (Rs.30000/ha and average immediate recharge area
of spring in Himalayan region is 1.5 – 3ha), it is possible to appropriate the funds from the
existing programs.
4. Along with supply side, the demand side management will be crucial as climate change
(impact of local ecosystems) and anthropogenic factors keep on threatening the water
resources. The demand side management practices like changing the cropping practices, less
water intense practices like SRI etc., should or can be promoted.
5. The inventory of the springs and other groundwater sources is necessary for the scientific
understanding. PHED, Geological department have some base information and mapping
which can be shared with other departments also and comprehensive spring/groundwater
inventory can be maintained by various departments in collaboration within their current
capacities.
6. The current capacities of the manpower are not adequate for conducting the springshed
development plans. Hence more hand-holding and capacity building will be required to
create the capable manpower at state level.
7. The land related acts in the NE states were discussed as one of the constraint for government
department in implementing the recharge works. Government owns very small fraction of
land i.e. approximately 8-10% and rest of the land is owned by communities. But considering
the participation of local communities is the key to PGWM, the community-led ownership
over land resources can be opportunity if communities are taken into confidence.
14
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
Way forward
Mr. Mhathung Yanthan, CEO SLNA-IWMP & Director Land Resources Department, Nagaland
has shown keen interest on initiating pilot programme across all the 11 districts of Nagaland in
collaboration with concerned departments and resource organizations. DoLR, Nagaland is also a
nodal agency for implementation of IWMP and hence it is possible to appropriate the funds for
the participatory springshed development at pilot basis. The Springs shall be selected in the
villages under SPEED (Special Program on Economic and Ecological Development) program of
DoLR, Nagaland. PSI will be the main technical, facilitator and capacity building agency. Other
North Eastern states also showed keen interest in initiating such training workshop in their
respective states for springshed development.
15
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
Annexure-I
1
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
30 bishwadeep@arghyam.org 9845891295
Mr.Bishwadeep Ghose Arghyam Director, Rural Water
31 Senior Development Officer, dwaghela@tatatrusts.org 9819488613
Mr.Divyang Waghela Tata Trust
SRTT
Participants
2
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
3
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
4
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
Annexure-II
th
Annexure: II Schedule (30 October, 2015)
1
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
2
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
1
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
Sunday, Holiday (Seema & Awi Tsuhah to visit the field site – Medziphema Village with Kaustubh)
Nov 1st
Date Session Subject Objective Issues Resource
Person/
Facilitator
Monday 8:30 am- Field Work
Nov 2nd 4:00 pm
Two teams formed to visit separate springs led by Rajesh Kumar & Awi Tsuhah & the other by Kaustabh Mahamuni
Seema Ravandale. Exercises related to geology & hydrology; identifying spring type and recharge zone, conducting
measurements of slope, spring discharges, delineation of catchment, preparing relevant social & resource maps for
availability and access to water, possible physical structures to be done.
Tuesday 8:30 am- Springs Regeneration Outlining basic treatment Water harvesting in the recharge zone, Rajesh
Nov 3rd 10:00 am Treatment Works methods vegetative and engineering measures. Kumar (RK)
10:00 am- TEA Break
10:30 am
10:30 am- Springs Regeneration Learning to read contour Scales, measurement of distances, slopes RK
12:30 pm Treatment Works (contd) maps and area
2
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
Th’day 8:30 am- GW Quality Testing Practice of different tests Participants use kits to test different AG, AT
Nov 5th 10:00 am Practicals of GW quality by the parameters for samples collected in the
participants field
10:00 am- TEA Break
10:30 am
10:30 am – GW Quality Testing Practice of different tests Participants use kits to test different AG, AT
12:30 pm Practicals of GW quality by the parameters for samples collected in the
participants field
12:30 pm– LUNCH
1:30 pm
1:30 pm– GW and Sanitation Avoiding contamination of Locating toilets and safe designs AG
2:30 pm GW due to unsafe practices
2:30pm- TEA
3
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
3:00 pm
3:00 pm – Open
4:00pm
Date Session Subject Objective Issues Resource
Person/Facil
itator
Friday 8:30 am- PGWM Introduction to PGWM Use case studies of Thanakasoga, AG
Nov 6th 10:30 am principles and practices Anantpur district (A.P.) &Randullabad
10:30 am- TEA Break
11:00 am
11:00 am – The Way Forward Planning for PGWM and Panel discussion with DoLR& PHED AG, SR, AT
12:30 pm SSD in Nagaland representatives
12:30 pm- Program Review Program Assessment, Participants fill out formats AT
1:00 pm Distribution of Kits &
certificates
1:00 pm– LUNCH
2:00 pm
2:00 pm – Slot for participants Slot for participants
2:30 pm
2:30 pm– Vote of Thanks AT, DoLR
2:40 pm
4
PGWM, Nagaland 2015
Annexure-III
Published Links
1. http://morungexpress.com/any-development-should-be-sustainable/
2. http://morungexpress.com/consultative-workshop-on-participatory-ground-water-
management-conclude/
1