GYM HOUSE Analysis Report

2019
Structural Analysis
and Design Report
A REPORT FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
AND DESIGN OF DOUBLE STOREY STEEL
COMMERCIAL BUILDING
The structural design of this residential building has been done as per
the provisions in National Building Code of Nepal. The overall
modeling of the building has been done in ETABS 2016 Ultimate a
renowned structural analysis program. The output of the ETABS
2016 Ultimate is imported into spreadsheet application. The design
philosophy followed is the Limit State Design as per IS: 800-1984. The
detailing for the seismic consideration has been done following
National Building Code.
Analysis & Design By:

Er. Praveen Rajbhandari
Civil Engineer
NEC Regd. No. “12025”
SIDDHARTHA ARCHITECT & CONSULTANT

Butwal-4, Rupandehi, Ph.no.-9857057405
Structural Analysis and Design Report
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
Subject: Issuing Disclaimer letter.
I, consultant going to issue this disclaimer letter on behalf of final structural analysis and design report
for Mahakalpa Krishi Sahakari Sanstha LTD during and after construction of proposed super structure.
The site supervisions and quality test of the different constructions materials of the proposed building
do not undertaken by the consultant. Hence any failure or error occurred with the building due to non-
implementation of the recommendations made in this report and structural drawing or due to improper
construction will not be the responsibility of the consultant/designer.
The structural analysis has been completed on the assumptions that the proposed building shall be
constructed under the proper supervisions of skilled technical manpower.
Er. Praveen Rajbhandari

Civil Engineer
NEC Regd. No. ”12025“
Civil ”A”
Page 2
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Building Descriptions

GENERAL INFORMATION AND DESIGN SUMMERY REQUIRED FOR FORM FILLING FOR
MUNICIPAL APPROVAL
Owner/Client Mahakalpa Krishi
Sahakari Sanstha LTD
1. Type of the Building Residential &Commercial
Building
2. Total Plinth Area of the Building 208.56 Sq.m.
3. Total Number of Storey 2
4. Total Height of the Truss Building 7.93 m
5. Typical Storey Height 3.2m
6. Least Lateral Base Dimension d 7.392 m
7. Height to Least Lateral Base Dimension: H/d 1.072
8. Bearing Capacity of the Soil Adopted 120 KN/m2
9. Analysis Software used for Building Design ETABS 2016.
10. Code used for Seismic Analysis of Building IS 1893:2002
11. Code used for Concrete Frame Design IS 456:2000
12. Code used for Steel Frame Design IS 800:2007
13. Total No. of Load Combination Considered for Truss Design 22
14. Total No. of Mode Considered 12
15. Total Seismic Weight of the Building used: WI 2136.0505 KN
16. Fundamental Translational Period: T=0.085*H (3/4) 0.401sec
17. Basic Seismic Coefficient for Translational Period: 0.09
18. Seismic Zoning Factor: Z 0.36
19. Importance Factor: (I) 1
20. Response Reduction Factor: K 5 (for SMRF)
21. Type of the Soil Considered Type II
22. Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient: 0.09
23. Design Horizontal Base Shear: Vh 192.2445KN
24. Eccentricity due to Mass and Stiffness Considered 0.05
25. Concrete Grade Used M20
26. Materials used MS Steel, CGI Sheet
27. Mild Steel Grade Used Fe250

This document presents the overall methodology and the key results of the structural design
of structural components of RC moment resisting frame system.
1.2 Structural System
Page 3
Steel special moment resisting frame system using steel rectangular tube is used to carry
the gravity load as well as to resist the lateral loads. RC footings are used to transfer the
load of the building to supporting soil.
The components of structural system used for this report are summarized in the following
table.
Structural System Element Typical Component
Types
SMRF Foundation RC Isolated footing
Beams and Column Steel Rectangular
Channel and I section
Plinth Beams Rectangular concrete
beam
Lintel Reinforced concrete
Walls Block Masonry with
cement mortar
1.3 Codes, Standards and References
The basic building codes referred are listed below. However, specific applications of those
code provisions are discussed in the corresponding sections.
Building codes
 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, IS 1893 (Part 1): 2002
 General Construction in Steel-Code of Practice, IS 800-2007
 Codes of Practice for Design Loads (other than earthquake) for Buildings and
Structures, IS 875 (Part 1): 1987
 Codes of Practice for Design Loads (other than earthquake) for Buildings and
Structures, IS 875 (Part 2): 1987
 Wind load Analysis, IS 875(part-3):1987
 Nepal Building Code.
Other references
 Related research papers and reports.
2 BASIC MATERIALS
Page 4
2.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the strength of materials used in the design of structural components.
2.2 Concrete
The minimum compressive strength measured at 28 days, for the cube specimen used in
different types of structural components are shown in the following table.
TABLE 2.1: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE
Member f'c (Nominal)

(MPa)
Footings 20
Beams 20
Plinth beams, Lintel 20
Column 20
The properties of concrete chosen are as follows:

Density : 25 KN/m3
Poisson’s ratio : 0.2
Modulus of elasticity : 25000, 22360 N/mm2
2.3 Reinforcing Steel/Rebar

Minimum yield strength of reinforcing steel to be used in the design should be of strength
500 MPa.
Density : 76.97 KN/m3

Poisson’s ratio : 0.3
Modulus of elasticity : 200000 N/mm2
2.4 Soil Bearing Capacity

Soil type II is considered in the current design. The allowable bearing capacity is
approximately between 100 KN/m2 to 150 KN/m2.
3 LOADS
3.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the design loads considered in the structural design, including gravity
loads and seismic loads.
S.N Descriptions Unit weight Reference

1 Concrete 25 KN/m³ IS-875(part 1) - 1987
Page 5
2 Masonry wall 19.2 KN/m³ IS-875(part-1)-1987(Table-1)

3 Cement Concrete, plain 12.55 KN/m³ IS-875(part-1)-1987(Table-1)
4 Plaster Punning 20.4 KN/m³ IS-875(part-1)-1987(Table-2)
3.2 Gravity Load

Self-weight of the structure is considered as dead load and finishes and partitions are
considered as superimposed dead load. Live load is determined in accordance with
occupancy or use. The following loads are in addition to the self-weight of the structure. The
minimum loading requirements shall be taken from IS 875 (Part 2)-1987 or equivalent.
Table 3-1: Live Load and Superimposed Dead Load

Occupancy or Use Live Load
Rooms 3.0 KN/m2

Corridors, passages, balconies and 5.0 KN/m2
staircase
Flat, sloping, curved roofs 0.75 KN/m2
3.3 Seismic Load

The basic seismic input may be determined from IS code. IS 1893:2002 based earthquake is
used as Design Basis Earthquake in code-based design. The response spectra used for the
design are shown in figure below.
Parameter Value
Zone factor, Z 0.36

Importance factor 1
Soil type II
Response reduction factor 5
3.4 Load calculations

A. Slab Load:
Slab Thickness 100 mm 3.125 KN/m3

B. Wall Load:
Type of Wall Thickness Density Opening Height W Load Adopted

m KN/m3 % m KN/m KN/m
Page 6
9" Wall without 0.230 19.2 0.00 2.86 12.63 12.63

Opening
9" Wall with Opening 0.230 19.2 30.00 2.86 8.85 8.85
4" Wall without 0.110 19.2 0.00 2.86 6.1 6.1

Opening
4" Wall with Opening 0.110 19.2 30.00 2.86 4.27 4.27
Parapet Wall 0.110 19.2 0.00 1.00 2.11 2.2
3.5 Load cases

Load cases are the independent loading for which the structure is explicitly analyzed.
Earthquake forces occur in random fashion in all directions. For building whose lateral load
resisting elements are oriented in two principal directions, it is usually sufficient to analyze
in these two principal directions (X and Y directions) separately one at a time. Thus, the load
cases adopted are as follows:
a) Dead Load (DL)

b) Live Load (LL)
c) Earthquake Load in +ve X-direction
d) Earthquake Load in -ve X-direction
e) Earthquake Load in +ve Y-direction
f) Earthquake Load in -ve X-direction
3.6 Load Combination

Ultimate strength design load combinations used in code-based design are shown in the
following table.
Table 3-3 : Ultimate Strength Design Load Combinations used in Code-based Design
No. Load Combination

1 1.5DL + 1.5L
2 1.DL + 1.3L±1.25E
3 0.9DL ± 1.25E
4 1.5DL + 1.5WL
5 1.DL + 1.2L±1.2WL
Page 7
6 1.DL + 1.2L±0.6WL
7 0.9DL ± 1.25WL
Where: D = Dead load , L = Live load ,WL =Wind Load, E = Effects of forces at DBE level 4
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
4.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the finite element modeling, analysis and design procedures used in
the code-based design.
4.1.1 POSITIONING AND ORIENTATION OF COLUMNS:
Following are some of the building principles, which help in deciding the columns positions.
• Columns should preferably be located at (or) near the corners of a building, and at
the intersection of beams/walls.
• Select the position of columns so as to reduce bending moments in beams.
• Avoid larger spans of beams.
Fig1: Positioning of Column
4.1.5 Modeling of Structural System
Complete, three-dimensional elastic models are created, representing the structure’s three-
dimensional distribution of the mass and stiffness to an extent that is adequate for the
calculation of the significant features of the building’s elastic response.
Etabs 2016 integrated software is used as analysis tool. The elastic models are used for
gravity and DBE level earthquake analysis. Nominal material properties are used in modeling
of structural components.
Page 8
Fig4: Modeling of structure
4.2 Analysis Procedures
4.2.1 Introduction
The analysis has been carried out using a standard software package ETABS 2016 based on
finite element method. The software is capable to carrying out a three dimensional analysis.
A three dimensional linear elastic analysis has been carried out. A model based on rigid
diaphragm concept has been considered. This is done by creating a special joint at the
center of mass of each floor level and constraining all the joints at this level by diaphragm
constraint.
The structure is assumed to be fixed at the plinth level. Below plinth beams footing has been
provided.
The stiffness contribution of hollow block walls in the structure has been ignored and the
building has been modeled as a “Bare Frame” with no infill wall panels.
The flange effect of the slab has been neglected. The beams have been modeled as
rectangular beams.
Analysis procedures used for code-based design are presented in the following sections.
Load cases Analysis type
Static Analysis Linear Static Analysis
Dynamic Analysis Response Spectrum / Eigen method
4.2.2 Modal Analysis

Modal analysis is carried out to determine the modal properties of the building. 100% of
dead load and superimposed dead load and 25% of live load are considered are considered
as mass source in modal analysis. Eigen analysis is used. Sufficient number of vibration
modes shall be considered to achieve at least 90% of participating mass of the building.
Page 9
4.2.3 Linear Static Procedure (LSP)

Linear static analysis is carried out for gravity loadings. Gravity load basically includes live
load in slab and distributed load on beams.
4.2.5 Component and member design

The structural components are designed to satisfy the strength and ductility requirements.
Strength capacity for different types of actions considered in the design is summarized in
the table below.
Table 4 : Structural system and component
Structural Component Design Code

System Approach/Consideration References
Special Steel Axial compression, Shear IS 800 : 2000

moment (Beams, and flexural
resisting Deck Slab,
frame Columns)
system
Footings Bearing capacity of soil IS 456 : 2000
5 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN RESULTS
5.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the analysis and design results of the residential building. The
structural components were analyzed using both- static and dynamic method. In static
analysis, linear static method was adopted whereas for dynamic, Response Spectrum
method using Eigen analysis.
5.2 Bending Moment Diagram

As loads were applied obviously the beam and column show their bending nature. After
analyzing we have to observe the BMD of every beam and columns. We have to check
balanced section, under-reinforced and over-reinforced section. This is very important task
before designing frames structure. The bending moment diagram is very much essential to
design the sections for stability of structures. To get the area of steel, bending moment is
essential and without bending moment diagram the design of any structure is not possible.
Page 10
Fig5: Bending Moment Diagram 1-1
5.3 Shear Force Diagram
Fig6: Shear Force Diagram 1-1
Page 11
5.3 Axial Force Diagram
Fig8: Axial Force Diagram 1-1
5.6 Base Shear Calculation Results

Seismic Lump Load:
TABLE: Auto Seismic - IS 1893:2002
Load Soil Period Base
Directio Coeff Weight Used
Patter Type Z Typ I R Used Shear
n Used
n e sec kN kN
192.244
EQ-X Seismic X 0.36 II 1 5 0.401 0.09 2136.0505 5
192.244
EQ-Y Seismic Y 0.36 II 1 5 0.401 0.09 2136.0505 5
TABLE: Auto Wind - IS 875:2015

Load Vb Terrain
Pattern Loading Method meter/sec Category K1 K2 K3
WIND-X Daiphragms 47 2 1 1 1
Seismic weight: Comprises Dead Load+ 25% of Live Load (as per IS Code for live load
intensity 3 KN/m2)
Seismic wt. at ith floor level (WI) = (Total dead load of all components i.e. Beam, Slab,
Columns And Walls for ½ height above and ½ height below the floor level + 25% of live load)
n
Total Weight of the frame, W= Wi Where, n = total number of storey
I=1
Seismic Wt of Building W = 2136.0505 KN

Base Shear Calculation:
Page 12
IS1893 2002 Auto Seismic Load Calculation

This calculation presents the automatically generated lateral seismic loads for load pattern EQX according
to IS1893 2002, as calculated by ETABS.
Direction and Eccentricity
Direction = X + Eccentricity Y
Eccentricity Ratio = 5% for all diaphragms
Structural Period
Period Calculation Method = User Specified
User Period T =0.401 sec
Factors and Coefficients
Seismic Zone Factor, Z [IS Table 2] Z=0.36

Response Reduction Factor, R [IS Table 7] R=5
Importance Factor, I [IS Table 6] I =1
Site Type [IS Table 1] = II
Seismic Response
Spectral Acceleration Coefficient, Sa /g [IS S a 1.36 Sa

6.4.5]
= =1.36
g T g
Equivalent Lateral Forces
Sa
ZI
Seismic Coefficient, Ah [IS 6.4.2] g
Ah =
2R
Calculated Base Shear
Period
W Vb
Direction Used
(kN) (kN)
(sec)
X 0.401 2136.0505 192.2445
IS1893 2002 Auto Seismic Load Calculation

This calculation presents the automatically generated lateral seismic loads for load pattern EQY according
to IS1893 2002, as calculated by ETABS.
Direction and Eccentricity
Direction = Y + Eccentricity X
Eccentricity Ratio = 5% for all diaphragms
Structural Period
Period Calculation Method = User Specified
Page 13
User Period T =0.401 sec
Factors and Coefficients
Seismic Zone Factor, Z [IS Table 2] Z=0.36

Response Reduction Factor, R [IS Table 7] R=5
Importance Factor, I [IS Table 6] I =1
Site Type [IS Table 1] = II
Seismic Response
Spectral Acceleration Coefficient, Sa /g [IS S a 1.36 Sa

6.4.5]
= =1.36
g T g
Equivalent Lateral Forces
Sa
ZI
Seismic Coefficient, Ah [IS 6.4.2] g
Ah =
2R
Calculated Base Shear
Period
W Vb
Direction Used
(kN) (kN)
(sec)
Y 0.401 2136.0505 192.2445
6 PARAMETERS TO BE CHECKED AFTER STATIC AND DYNAMIC

ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE.
6.1 Modal Mass Participation ratios

TABLE: Modal Participating Mass Ratios
Perio
Case Mode d Sum UX Sum UY Sum RX Sum RY
sec
0.0000250
Modal 1 0.713 0.9551 0.0003 4 0.024
Modal 2 0.657 0.9552 0.9853 0.0136 0.024
Modal 3 0.589 0.9797 0.9894 0.0139 0.0246
Modal 4 0.213 0.9998 0.9895 0.0148 0.9698
Modal 5 0.187 0.9998 0.9998 0.9496 0.9703
Modal 6 0.163 0.9999 1 0.9664 0.9761
Modal 7 0.089 1 1 0.9664 0.9773
Modal 8 0.081 1 1 0.9664 0.9774
Modal 9 0.062 1 1 0.9664 0.9775
Modal 10 0.06 1 1 0.9664 0.9777
Modal 11 0.058 1 1 0.9665 0.9785
Modal 12 0.055 1 1 0.9665 0.9785
Page 14
Modal analysis was performed in order to determine the vibration modes of a building. The
first and second modes of the building are translation in X and Y directions while the third
mode is in torsion. More than 90 % of mass has been participated in eleventh mode in both
directions. The natural periods and modal participating mass ratios are shown in table
above.
6.3 Torsion Check

TABLE: Story Max/Avg Drifts
Max Avg
Directio
Story Load Case/Combo Drift Drift Ratio
n
mm mm
Story 1.06
3 EQ-X X 11.875 11.116 8
Story
3 EQ-Y Y 10.779 10.774 1.01
Story 1.11
2 EQ-X X 17.683 13.466 3
Story 1.00
2 EQ-Y Y 16.991 16.953 2
Story 1.12
1 EQ-X X 12.282 10.028 5
Story 1.00
1 EQ-Y Y 14.857 14.828 2
Building is safe in both directions for Torsion <=1.2
6.4 Modal Periods and Frequencies

TABLE: Modal Periods and Frequencies
Perio Frequenc Circular
Case d y Frequency Eigenvalue
Mode sec cyc/sec rad/sec rad²/sec²
Modal 1 0.713 1.403 8.8157 77.7166
Modal 2 0.657 1.522 9.5609 91.4102
Modal 3 0.589 1.699 10.674 113.9341
Modal 4 0.213 4.701 29.5347 872.2968
Modal 5 0.187 5.349 33.6061 1129.3732
Modal 6 0.163 6.123 38.4747 1480.3024
Modal 7 0.089 11.206 70.4084 4957.3383
Modal 8 0.081 12.404 77.9393 6074.5317
10266.512
Modal 9 0.062 16.126 101.3238 9
Modal 10 0.06 16.622 104.4362 10906.926
Modal 11 0.058 17.291 108.6437 11803.456
13190.951
Modal 12 0.055 18.279 114.8519 5
Page 15
6.5 Support reaction for the design of footing
Page 16
6.6 Display Footing Reaction in Tabulated Form
7 SAMPLE DESIGN OF RCC STRUCTURES
Isolated Footing

1 Footing Size Design

Load Pu 185 KN
Design Load P 124 KN

Moment in x dir Mux 2 KN-m
Moment in y dir Muy -1 KN-m

Column size cx 300 mm
cy 300 mm
Page 17

SBC q 120 KN/sqm

Footing Size required A req 0.92 sqmm

L 1.20 meters
Footing Size Provided
B 1.20 meters
Area Provided A prvd 1.44 meters

Zx 0.29
Zx 0.29

Net upward pressure Nup 72 KNm2

Footing Size OK

2 Slab Design
lx 0.450
ly 0.450

Bending Moment in x dir Mx 11 KN-m
Bending Moment in y dir My 11 KN-m

Concrete fck 20 MPa
Steel fy 500 MPa

Minimum Depth Required dmin 64

Depth Provided D 400 mm
Clear Cover c 50 mm
Effective Cover d' 56 mm
Effective Depth d' 344 mm

Spacing c/c in mm
Area of Steel
12# 16# 20#
761
274 c/c 487 c/c
413 sqmm c/c
761
274 c/c 487 c/c
413 sqmm c/c
Minimum Ast required across x direcion
Minimum Ast required across y direcion

Ast across x direction 12 mm dia @ 125 mm c/c 905 sqmm
Ast across y direction 12 mm dia @ 125 mm c/c 905 sqmm

3 One Way Shear along x direction

Vu1 14 KN
ζv 0.033 MPa

Page 18
ζc 0.260 MPa
Vc1 107 KN

One Way Shear Check OK

4 One Way Shear along y direction

Vu1 14 KN
ζv 0.033 MPa

ζc 0.260 MPa
Vc1 107 KN

One Way Shear Check OK

5 Two Way Shear
Vu2 110 KN
ζv 0.125 MPa

ks*ζc 1.118 MPa
Vc1 991 KN

Two Way Shear Check OK

L= 1.20 meters

300
B
300
= 1.20 meters

Page 19

400 mm

150 mm

12 mm dia @ 125 mm c/c 12 mm dia @ 125 mm c/c

7.3 Section of steel for design of Column
Fig: Section at 1-1
Page 20
Fig: Section at A-A
Fig: WALL LOAD
Page 21
LIVE LOAD<=3
LIVE LOAD>=3
Page 22
WIND LOAD
CGI SHEET LOAD
Page 23
ETABS 2016 Steel Frame Design

IS 800:2007 Steel Section Check (Strength Summary)
Element Details (Part 1 of 2)

Level Element Unique Name Location (mm) Combo Design Type Element Type Section
Story1 C8 56 1525 UDStlS17 Column Special Moment Frame 2XISMC 150

Classification Rolled
Class 3 No
Seismic Parameters
MultiResponse P-Δ Done? Ignore Seismic Code? Ignore Special EQ Load? D/P Plug Welded?
Envelopes No No No Yes
Design Code Parameters

ɣM0 ɣM1 An /Ag LLRF PLLF Stress ratio Limit
1.1 1.25 1 1 0.75 0.96
Section Properties
A (cm²) Izz (cm⁴) rzz (mm) Ze,zz (cm³) Av,z (cm²) Zp,zz (cm³) Iyz (cm⁴) It (cm⁴)
42.9 1598.6 61 213.1 42.9 245.7 0 9.5
J (cm⁴) Iyy (cm⁴) ryy (mm) Ze,yy (cm³) Av,y (cm²) Zp,yy (cm³) Iw (cm⁶) h (mm)
9.5 3552.7 91 315.8 17.3 376.8 150
Section Properties --- Unsymmetric Sections

Iyz (cm⁴) Imax (cm⁴) Imin (cm⁴) Ze,max (cm³) Ze,min (cm³) rmax (mm) rmin (mm) α (deg)
0 3552.7 1598.6 315.8 213.1 91 61 90
Material Properties
E (MPa) fy (MPa) fu (MPa) Rotation; (deg)
210000 345 450 90
Stress Check Forces and Moments

Location (mm) N (kN) Mzz (kN-m) Myy (kN-m) Vy (kN) Vz (kN) To (kN-m)
1525 -96.1113 -0.7518 -2.3997 20.7348 5.1032 8.639E-06
PMM Demand/Capacity (D/C) Ratio 9.3.2.2(a)

D/C Ratio = P / Pdy + Ky * Cmy * (My,span / Mdy; ) + KLT *
(Mz,span / Mdz; )
0.736 = 0.154 + 0.042 + 0.54
Page 24
Basic Factors
Buckling Mode K Factor L Factor L Length (mm) KL/r
Major (z-z) 1.583 0.953 3050 79.126
Major Braced 0.71 0.953 3050 35.481
Minor (y-y) 1.768 0.953 3050 59.294
Minor Braced 0.745 0.953 3050 24.969
LTB 1.768 0.953 3050 59.294
Axial Force Design

N Force Td Capacity Nd Capacity Pdy Capacity Pz Capacity Pd Capacity
kN kN kN kN kN kN
Axial -96.1113 1346.8227 1346.8227 623.8232 988.6681 415.6325
Tdg Tdn Ncr,T Ncr,TF An /Ag N /Nd

kN kN kN kN Unitless Unitless
1346.8227 1391.3264 642.4685 642.4685 1 0.071
Design Parameters for Axial Design

Curve α fcc (MPa) λ Φ χ fcd (MPa)
Major (z-z) c 0.49 735.68 0.685 0.853 0.734 230.23
MajorB (z-z) c 0.49 3658.85 0.307 0.573 0.946 296.55
Minor (y-y) c 0.49 265.27 1.14 1.381 0.463 145.27
MinorB (y-y) c 0.49 1495.98 0.48 0.684 0.854 145.27
Torsional TF c 0.49 149.61 1.519 1.976 0.309 96.79
Moment Designs
M Moment Mspan Moment Md(yield) Capacity Mdv Capacity Mnd Capacity Md(LTB) Capacity
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major (z-z) -0.7518 -32.3724 66.8512 66.8512 66.8512 58.5015
Minor (y-y) -2.3997 -10.1822 99.0438 99.0438 99.0438
Curve αLT λLT ΦLT χLT C1 Mcr (kN-m)

LTB c 0.49 0.442 0.657 0.875 2.7 377.1323
Cmy Cmz CmLT kz ky KLT My / Mdy Mz / Mdz α1 α2

Factors 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.008 1.023 0.975 -0.024 -0.011 2 2
Shear Design
V Force (kN) Vd Capacity (kN) To Capacity (kN-m) Stress Ratio Status Check
Major (y) 20.7348 312.4998 8.639E-06 0.066 OK
Minor (z) 5.1032 777.5881 8.639E-06 0.007 OK
Shear Design
Vp (kN) kv (Unitless) ΛW (Unitless) Τb (MPa)
Reduction 312.4998 0 0 1
ETABS 2016 Steel Frame Design

IS 800:2007 Steel Section Check (Strength Summary)
Page 25

Level Element Unique Name Location (mm) Combo Design Type Element Type Section
Story1 B7 103 3925 UDStlS18 Beam Special Moment Frame ISHB150-1

Classification Rolled
Class 2 Yes
Seismic Parameters
MultiResponse P-Δ Done? Ignore Seismic Code? Ignore Special EQ Load? D/P Plug Welded?
Envelopes No No No Yes
Design Code Parameters

ɣM0 ɣM1 An /Ag LLRF PLLF Stress ratio Limit
1.1 1.25 1 1 0.75 0.96
Section Properties
A (cm²) Izz (cm⁴) rzz (mm) Ze,zz (cm³) Av,z (cm²) Zp,zz (cm³) Iyz (cm⁴) It (cm⁴)
34.5 1455.6 65 194.1 27 194.1 0 8
J (cm⁴) Iyy (cm⁴) ryy (mm) Ze,yy (cm³) Av,y (cm²) Zp,yy (cm³) Iw (cm⁶) h (mm)
8 431.7 35.4 57.6 8.1 57.6 25161.9 150
Material Properties
J (cm⁴) Iyy (cm⁴) ryy (mm)
8 431.7 35.4
E (MPa) fy (MPa) fu (MPa)

210000 345 450
Stress Check Forces and Moments

Location (mm) N (kN) Mzz (kN-m) Myy (kN-m) Vy (kN) Vz (kN) To (kN-m)
3925 -1.1003 -8.4042 0.0063 50.4072 0.0015 0.0041
PMM Demand/Capacity (D/C) Ratio 9.3.2.2(a)

D/C Ratio = P / Pdy + Ky * Cmy * (My,span / Mdy; ) + KLT *
(Mz,span / Mdz; )
0.944 = 0.001 + 1.708E-04 + 0.943
Basic Factors
Major (z-z) 1 0.963 3850 59.255
Major Braced 1 0.963 3850 59.255
Minor (y-y) 1 0.25 1000 28.261
Page 26

Minor Braced 1 0.25 1000 28.261
LTB 1 0.25 1000 28.261
Axial Force Design

N Force Td Capacity Nd Capacity Pdy Capacity Pz Capacity Pd Capacity
kN kN kN kN kN kN
Axial -1.1003 1081.4182 1081.4182 990.447 806.8316 806.8316
Tdg Tdn Ncr,T Ncr,TF An /Ag N /Nd

kN kN kN kN Unitless Unitless
1081.4182 1117.152 10705.6696 10705.6696 1 0.001
Design Parameters for Axial Design

Curve α fcc (MPa) λ Φ χ fcd (MPa)
Major (z-z) b 0.34 590.3 0.764 0.888 0.746 234
MajorB (z-z) b 0.34 590.3 0.764 0.888 0.746 234
Minor (y-y) c 0.49 2594.98 0.365 0.607 0.916 287.25
MinorB (y-y) c 0.49 2594.98 0.365 0.607 0.916 287.25
Torsional TF c 0.49 3104.89 0.333 0.588 0.932 292.33
Moment Designs
M Moment Mspan Moment Md(yield) Capacity Mdv Capacity Mnd Capacity Md(LTB) Capacity
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major (z-z) -8.4042 -56.2275 60.8768 60.8768 60.8768 59.6421
Minor (y-y) 0.0063 0.0035 18.0655 18.0655 18.0655
Curve αLT λLT ΦLT χLT C1 Mcr (kN-m)

LTB a 0.21 0.29 0.552 0.98 1.096 793.8829
Cmy Cmz CmLT kz ky KLT My / Mdy Mz / Mdz α1 α2

Factors 0.878 0.532 0.9 1.001 1 1 3.471E-04 -0.138 1 2
Shear Design
V Force (kN) Vd Capacity (kN) To Capacity (kN-m) Stress Ratio Status Check
Major (y) 50.4072 146.6731 0.0041 0.344 OK
Minor (z) 0.0015 488.9105 0.0041 0 OK
Shear Design
Vp (kN) kv (Unitless) ΛW (Unitless) Τb (MPa)
Reduction 146.6731 0 0 1
End Reaction Major Shear Forces

Left End Reaction (kN) Load Combo Right End Reaction (kN) Load Combo
79.5906 UDStlS22 67.539 UDStlS22
3.3. Base Plate Design

2
Uniform Pressure on base slab under factored axial load, w = 15.86 N/mm
Page 27
Longer projection of slab base beyond the column, a = 300 mm

Shorter projection of slab base beyond the column, b = 300 mm
2
Yield stress of the base plate, fy = 250 N/mm
Flange thickness of compression member, tf = 12.4
mm gmo = 1.1 (IS 800:2007, Table 5)
(From IS 800:2007, Clause 7.4.3.1)

Minimum Thickness of Base Slab, ts = 5.84 mm > 5.4 mm
Provide thickness of base plate = 20 mm
3.4. Check for Bearing Capacity of Bolt

Diameter of Bolt, d = 20 mm
Clearance = 2 mm
Diameter of hole, do = 22 mm
gmb = 1.25 (IS 800:2007, Table 5)
Thickness of base plate, t = 20 mm

Axial Compression force on plate = 26.84 kN
(From IS 800:2007, Clause 10.3.4)
Design bearing strength of a bolt on plate, Vdpb = Vnpb/gmb
Vnpb = Nominal bearing strength of a bolt = 2.5*Kb*d*t*fu

Kb = 1
Vnpb = 246 kN
Vdpb = 196.8 kN > 26.84 (OK)
8 SUMMARY OF THE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
8.1 Footing Design Summary

Concrete Grade: M20
Steel Grade: Fe 500
Clear Cover: 50 mm
Foundation design summary

Footing Footing Size Total area Depth Rebar Footing
Type m of footing D d X-Dir Y-Dir Location
m2
mm mm Dia c/c Dia c/c
Page 28
Slab
F1 1.2mx1.2m 1.44 400 200 12 100 12 100 Overall Isolated
8.2 SUMMARY OF FINAL DESIGN OUTPUTS:
Beams Rebars at Support Rebars at mid span

Top Bottom Top Bottom
Plinth Beam(300x230mm) 2-16 mm dia. 2-16mm 2-16 mm 2-16 mm

bars dia. bars dia. bars dia. bars
2x ISMC 150 BOX

Column
ISHB 150
Beam
Base Plate 20mm
According to analysis and design required sizes of structure were adopted

SN Structures Sizes(inch)
1 Column 2x ISMC 150 BOX
(Rectangular Section)
2 Beam ISHB150
(I Section)
Concrete grade M20 Column M20 Beam, Footing and
Slabs
Steel grade Fe500 for main bar Fe415(stirrups)
9 Concluding Remarks
Reinforced concrete construction is common all over the world. It is used extensively for
construction of variety of structures such as buildings, bridges, dams, water tanks, stadiums,
towers, tunnels and so on.
Page 29
Experiences from past earthquakes and extensive laboratories works have shown that a
well-designed and detailed reinforced concrete structure is suitable for earthquake resistant
structures. Ductility and strength required to resist major earthquake can be achieved by
following the recommendations made in the standard codes of practice for earthquake
resistant design.
Design and construction of the structure are inter-related jobs. A building behaves in a
manner how it has been built rather than what the intensions is during designing. A large
percentage of structure failures are attributed due to poor quality of construction.
Therefore, quality assurance is needed in both design and construction.
In earthquake resistant construction quality of materials and workmanship plays a very

important role. It has been observed that damages during earthquake are largely dependent
on the quality and workmanship. Hence, quality assurance is the most important factor in
the good seismic behavior of the structure.
END OF REPORT
Page 30
Page 31

GYM HOUSE Analysis Report

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

GYM HOUSE Analysis Report

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

2019

Analysis & Design By:

SIDDHARTHA ARCHITECT & CONSULTANT

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

Subject: Issuing Disclaimer letter.

Er. Praveen Rajbhandari

1.1 Building Descriptions

27. Mild Steel Grade Used Fe250

1.2 Structural System

1.3 Codes, Standards and References

 General Construction in Steel-Code of Practice, IS 800-2007

 Wind load Analysis, IS 875(part-3):1987

 Nepal Building Code.

TABLE 2.1: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE

Member f'c (Nominal)

The properties of concrete chosen are as follows:

2.3 Reinforcing Steel/Rebar

Density : 76.97 KN/m3

2.4 Soil Bearing Capacity

S.N Descriptions Unit weight Reference

2 Masonry wall 19.2 KN/m³ IS-875(part-1)-1987(Table-1)

3.2 Gravity Load

Table 3-1: Live Load and Superimposed Dead Load

Rooms 3.0 KN/m2

3.3 Seismic Load

Zone factor, Z 0.36

3.4 Load calculations

Slab Thickness 100 mm 3.125 KN/m3

Type of Wall Thickness Density Opening Height W Load Adopted

9" Wall without 0.230 19.2 0.00 2.86 12.63 12.63

4" Wall without 0.110 19.2 0.00 2.86 6.1 6.1

Parapet Wall 0.110 19.2 0.00 1.00 2.11 2.2

3.5 Load cases

a) Dead Load (DL)

3.6 Load Combination

No. Load Combination

Fig1: Positioning of Column

4.1.5 Modeling of Structural System

Fig4: Modeling of structure

4.2 Analysis Procedures

4.2.2 Modal Analysis

4.2.3 Linear Static Procedure (LSP)

4.2.5 Component and member design

Table 4 : Structural system and component

Structural Component Design Code

Special Steel Axial compression, Shear IS 800 : 2000

5.2 Bending Moment Diagram

Fig5: Bending Moment Diagram 1-1

5.3 Shear Force Diagram

Fig6: Shear Force Diagram 1-1

5.3 Axial Force Diagram

Fig8: Axial Force Diagram 1-1

5.6 Base Shear Calculation Results

TABLE: Auto Wind - IS 875:2015

Seismic Wt of Building W = 2136.0505 KN

IS1893 2002 Auto Seismic Load Calculation

Direction and Eccentricity

Eccentricity Ratio = 5% for all diaphragms

Period Calculation Method = User Specified

User Period T =0.401 sec

Factors and Coefficients

Seismic Zone Factor, Z [IS Table 2] Z=0.36

Spectral Acceleration Coefficient, Sa /g [IS S a 1.36 Sa

Vnpb = Nominal bearing strength of a bolt = 2.5Kbdtfu