TOK — Oral Presentation a Partner or Individually What it is? This 20 minute presentation with a partner (10:00 if done individually) is based on a real life situation. You must explore the knowledge issues raised by the topic. You choose the topic, which should reflect your personal interests. You should consult your teacher about your choice of topic, to ensure that it is appropriate and will meet the criteria. We are encouraging students to prepare a presentation which has a “creative” element to it, but this is not a requirement. Format Presentations may take many forms, such as lectures, skits, simulations, games, dramatized readings, interviews or debates. Students may use supporting material such as videos, MS PowerPoint Presentations, overhead projections, posters, questionnaires, recordings of songs “or interviews, costumes, or props. Under no circumstances, however, should the presentation be simply an essay read aloud to the class. Each presentation will have twé stages: 1. An introduction, briefly describing the real-life situation and linking it to one or more relevant knowledge issue 2. A treatment of the knowledge issue(s) that explores their nature and responses to them, and shows how these relate to the chosen situation. A good presentation will demonstrate the presenter’s personal involvement in the topic and show both why the topic is important and how it relates to AOKs and WOKs (see assessment criteria for more details). 'f you are happy with the results on this task, it will count as your offical |B TOK presentation grade, meaning this element of your TOK course will be complete When and how it is done The presentation will be done in front of the class starting in late January and may partly involve the class, for example, through questions after the presentation. You will perform or discuss your chosen topic, then explain/justify the choices you have made and make the connections to TOK. Whichever way you do it, the teacher will ask you some questions at the end of the presentation to probe your knowledge and understanding further. How it is marked ‘The presentation will be assessed by your teacher using the formal assessment criteria you have been Provided with, Please note that you cannot be persuasive if you are largely reading your presentation, ‘so you should take care to engage your audience. Know your material well and only use brief notes or headings. Examples of presentation topics 't should be noted that these are merely examples, meant only to illustrate the kinds of topics appropriate for TOK presentations. In particular, they are included to provide a concrete sense of what is meant by “reablife situation ‘contemporary problem” and to show how a knowledge issue can be identified in it and then treated from different perspectives. As well as guiding the selection of appropriate topics, the examples also illustrate ways that topics may be treated in the presentation, in accordance with the assessment criteria. Real-life situation/contemporary pro! Global warming . Knowledge issues: “Can we be certain that global warming is taking place?” or, “Does language (or the use of statistics, graphs, photographs) affect our view of whether or not the planet is undergoing global warming?” Format: Students analyse and critically evaluate video and newspaper clips involving the views of experts, politicians and activists who defend or dispute the notion that the planet is suffering fromglobal warming. Each member of the group draws attention to different aspects of the evidence—the nature of the words used, statistics and graphs, photographs. Knower's (student's) point of view: As a group, students suggest that the evidence in favour of global warming seems compelling, but underline that in some cases it is difficult to separate some protagonists’ positions and how they are formulated from the interest groups they represent. Real-life situation/contemporary problem: Intensive agriculture Knowledge issue: “How can we know whether intensive farming methods are always harmful?” Format: Inputs by students representing the views of farmers in different circumstances from different parts of the world, cross-examined by a presenter and members of the audience. Knower's (student's) point of view: It may be easy to take a view on (to think we know) what is right in our own situation. Looked at globally the question is much more complicated. Real-life situation/contemporary problem: Reliability of media reporting of science Knowledge issues: “What constitutes responsible journalism? How can we know whether scientific conclusions are justified?” Format: Summary and analysis of a newspaper article reporting on a new scientific study showing that a diet that contains no fat can lead to more weight gain than a similar diet that contains some fat (the original stimulus). Discussion of the quality of the newspaper article (what information ought it to contain, so that we can make a good judgment about the reliability of the claims made?) and of the scientific study it describes (how can we tell whether the evidence cited in the scientific study justifies its conclusions?). Knower’s (student's) point of view: It is easy to tell that some newspapers are more concemed with entertainment than with truth. How easy is it to tell how much credibility to give to more serious stories? Real-life situation/contemporary problem: What Sa work of art? Knowledge issues: "What is it that distinguishes an ordinary bag of rubbish from a major work of art that just looks like a bag of rubbish? Can anything be art—and, if so, what makes it into art?” Format: Skit of a TV talk show discussion about an incident when an artwork in an exhibition, consisting of a plastic bag full of rubbish, was mistakenly thrown out by a cleaner. Students role-play the host of the show, the artist of the work in question, a visual arts critic and a gallery owner, all of whom offer other examples of contentious contemporary art and their ideas about what distinguishes these artworks from non-art. of view: Why are people prepared to dismiss contemporary art without while often blindly believing scientific claims, however outlandish and Knower's (student's) poi understanding much about improbable? Your next step. Once you have decided what you would like to do, discuss this briefly with your teacher to check that it is appropriate. Look at the descriptors (assessment criteria) carefully and ensure that what you have planned will allow you to demonstrate those qualities. You need to fill out a TOK presentation planning form (attached to this package).Remember that ten minutes of speaking demands a lot of preparation if it is to be sharp and persuasive, But DO NOT write it out as if an essay, or you will be trying to remember what you wrote and that is not an oral. Instead, assemble your material, find a good order for it and way of presenting it, and make headings only. You will need to fee! comfortable about and in control of your material if you are to maintain eye contact and compel your audience with your ideas. | he key to this is planning and practice. Avoid being too technological, though simple visual aids and props can be helpful. This can be an enjoyable experience and others can leam a lot from it too.Part 2 Presentation A Identification of knowledge issue ‘+ Didthe presentation identify a relevant knowledgeissue involved, implicit or embedded in areat-life situation? ——_—_—— Achievement level | Descriptor ° Level 1 was not achieved. i ‘The presentation referred to a knowledge issue but it was irelevant to the | @ realife situation under consideration, | Ba “The presentationidentified a knowledge issue that was in some ways relevant to the reab-life station under consideration. i 5 “The presentation identified a knowledge issue that was clearly relevant to the reab-lfe situation under consideration. B_ Treatment of knowledge issues + Did the presentation showa good understanding of knowledge issues, in the context of the real-life situation? Descriptor ‘Achievement level ° Level 1 was not achieved. 12 ‘The presentation showed some understanding of knowledge issues. 4 ‘The presentation showed an adequate understanding of knowledge issues.C Knower's perspective + _ Did thepresentation, particularly in the use of arguments and examples, show an indi and demonstrate the significance of the topic? idual approach Cees Achievement level | Dessripto ° | Level 1 was not achieved. ‘The presentation, ints use of arguments and examples or otherwise, showed 12 limited personal involvement and did not demonstrate the significance of the topic. | _ = —| The presentation, in its use of arguments and examples orotherwise, showed | a4 some personal involvement and adequately demonstrated the signifiance | of the topic. ‘The presentation, in its distinctively personal use of arguments and examples 5 or otherwise, showed clear personal involvement and fully demonstrated | the significance of the topic. D Connections + _ Did the presentation give a balanced account of how the topic could be approached from different Perspectives? ‘+ _ Didthe presentation show how the positions taken on the knowledge issues would have implications in related areas? + _ In awarding the higher achievement levels, the emphasis should be more on the quality of the Consideration of connections than on the quantity of connections mentioned. Achievement level | Descriptor: ° Level 1 was not achieved. 12 ‘The presentation explored at least two different perspectives to some extent. | ‘The presentation gave a satisfactory account of how the question could be | a4 approached from diferent perspectives, and began to explore thee similares and differences. The presentation gave a clear account of how the question could be 5 approached from different perspectives and considered their implications in related areas.International” TK/PPD Baccalaureate Presentation planning document Submit to: Tok teacher Arrival date: See below Session: .. ofo School number: School name: + Write legibly using black ink and retain a copy of this form. + Complete this form in the working language of your school (English, French or Spanish). + Do not send to 1B Cardiff or to the moderator unless you have been instructed to do so. Retain the forms until after the publication of results Candidate name: Candidate session number: ojo Title of presentation: Please describe your planning for the presentation, either in the space below, or on an attached A4 word-processed page by completing 1, 2 and 3 below. 1. What is the real life situation under consideration? 2. What is the TOK knowledge issue that will be the focus of your presentation? (This must be ‘expressed as a question) 3. Write a summary in note form (for example, a bullet point list), of the way you plan to deal with knowledge issues during your presentation BD _Hancbook of procedures forthe Diploma Programme 2011International” TK/PMF Baccalaureate Presentation marking form Submit to: Tok teacher Arrival date: See below Session: School number: oie Schoo! name: . + Write legibly using black ink and retain a copy of this form. + Complete this form in the working language of your school (English, French or Spanish). + Do not send to 1B Cardiff or to the moderator unless instructed to do so. Retain the forms until after the Publication of results Candidate namé ‘Candidate session number: olo I Title of presentation: ‘Presenter’s assessment Each presenter should give themselves an achievement level for each of the four assessment criteria, Presenters should briefly justify the level they have given, in the “Comments/evidence” space provided. ‘Achievement Criterion Commentsievidence eum vlolol> Total (120) 1 certify that this presentation was the work of myself (and my co-presenters, if applicable). Candidate's signature: a comme | ‘Teacher’s assessment In the “Comments/evidence” box, please indicate briefly why you have given each level Criterion Commentsevidenco Aatiavetnant A 8 e . . Total ( 120) Duration of presentation: 1 certify that this presentation was, to the best of my knowledge, the work of the presenters named (with permitted teacher support). ‘Teacher's name (printed) and signature: Date: BD _Handbook of procedures forthe Diploma Programme 2011