Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Velva L. Price
District Clerk
Travis County
D-1-GN-20-004719 D-1-GN-20-004719
CAUSE NO. ______________
Ruben Tamez
MARCY RENNEBERG, ALINE RENNEBERG, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
WANDA WEBB, LELAND WEBB, §
Plaintiffs, §
§
v. §
§ 53RD
___ JUDICIAL DISTRICT
GREG ABBOTT;TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN §
SERVICES COMM’N; CECILE YOUNG, Exec. §
Comm’r, Texas Health and Human Services Comm’n; §
STATE OF TEXAS, PINE ARBOR NURSING HOME, §
and PARK VALLEY INN, SAN GABRIEL §
REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER §
Defendants. § TRAVIS COUNTY TEXAS
Plaintiffs are MARCY RENNEBERG and her mother ALINE RENNEBERG, married
couple WANDA WEBB and LELAND WEBB, two pairs of individuals separated by policies
implemented by nursing homes at the demand of Governor Greg Abbott and state agents. These
plaintiffs come now to file this Original Petition and Application for Equitable Relief, including
a temporary restraining order against the defendants, including the State of Texas, Gov. Abbott,
THHS, Pine Arbor Nursing Home, and San Gabriel Rehabilitation and Care Center (“Defendant
essential family visitors, damaging the health of residents in these facilities, and costing precious
time to the residents and their families. The Defendant Nursing Homes are breaching contracts
with Plaintiffs by disallowing residents to visit with loved ones even when they have medical
power of attorney for residents, resulting in elder abuse and violating the Americans with
Disabilities Act by failing to provide equal access to medical care to their residents. This Court
should order Defendants to allow residents to receive visits by essential family caregivers under
1. Plaintiffs intend to conduct discovery under Level 3 of the rules set forth in Rule 190 of
2. Plaintiffs request Defendants provide disclosures in accordance with Texas Rule of Civil
4. Plaintiffs are seeking monetary relief of $100,000 or less and non-monetary relief.
5. Plaintiff Marcy Renneberg and Maria Renneberg are Texas residents and may be served
6. Plaintiffs Wanda Webb and Leland Webb are Texas residents and may be served through
7. Defendant Greg Abbott is the governor of the State of Texas and is being sued in his
official capacity only. He may be served at 1100 San Jacinto Boulevard, Austin, Texas 78701.
8. Defendant Cecile Young is the Executive Director of the Texas Health and Human
Services Commission (“HHSC”) and is being sued in her official capacity as the Executive
Director of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission. She may be served with process
at 4900 N. Lamar Blvd. Austin, Texas 78751 or wherever she may be found.
9. Defendant State of Texas can be served at the Office of the Attorney General, 300 W.
facility located in Silsbee, Texas. It may be served through its Administrator Wendy K Jeselink
11. Defendant San Gabriel Rehabilitation and Care Center South is owned by Limestone
Hospital District and is a skilled nursing care facility located in Round Rock, Texas. It may be
served through Administrator Leah Gage at 4100 College Park Drive Round Rock, TX 78665.
12. Plaintiffs seek relief that can be granted by courts of law or equity.
13. The Court has jurisdiction over the Plaintiffs’ request for declaratory relief against
Defendants because the Declaratory Judgment Act waives governmental immunity when the
plaintiff is challenging the validity of an ordinance, order, or government action. See Tex. Civ.
Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 37.004, 37.006; Texas Lottery Comm’n v. First State Bank of DeQueen,
325 S.W.3d 628 (2010); Texas Educ. Agency v. Leeper, 893 S.W.2d 432, 446 (Tex. 1994).
14. The Court has jurisdiction over the Plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief against
Defendants Abbott and Young because they are acting ultra vires by keeping Plaintiffs from in-
person visits with each other in violation of Texas law and the Texas Constitution. See City of El
15. Plaintiffs have standing to seek declaratory and injunctive relief because they have been
17. Venue is proper in Travis County because Defendants have their principal office in
Travis County, Texas. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 15.002(a)(3).
956 F.3d 696 (5th Cir. 2020), Plaintiffs expect Defendant Abbott to assert that his proclamations
and orders are not the same as enforcing non-laws and thus he should be permitted to dodge
responsibility for the wanton economic destruction he is causing. To be sure, the Fifth Circuit
recognized in In re Abbott that under section 418.012 of the Texas Government Code, the Texas
Governor “may issue executive orders, proclamations, and regulations and amend or rescind
them,” but then concluded that the Governor does not have the power to enforce such orders and
thus is not subject to suit under the Eleventh Amendment. Id. at 708-710.
19. Plaintiffs acknowledge the Fifth Circuit’s ruling and recognize that Abbott did not
physically appear at Plaintiffs’ businesses on a white steed and armed with a Colt .45 to ensure
compliance with his executive orders. However, this is not a federal suit, and this Texas court
20. The Fifth Circuit’s evaluation warrants examination if only to distinguish between every
case it cites and this suit. In In re Abbott, the Fifth Circuit granted mandamus to release Gov.
Abbott and the Attorney General because they were only creating and threatening enforcement
of executive orders, but not harming abortion providers by closing them down, therefore missing
the “enforcement connection” element necessary for a court to order mandamus. 956 F.3d at
709-710 (discussing Ex parte Young and injunctions against state officials). In this case,
Governor Abbott’s executive order directly states that “People shall not visit nursing homes…”
21. Article I, § 28 of the Texas Constitution states, “No power of suspending laws in this
22. Article I, § 19 of the Texas Constitution states, ““No citizen of this State shall be
23. Article I, § 27 of the Texas Constitution states, “The citizens shall have the right, in a
24. Article XI, § 5 of the Texas Constitution provides that “no charter or any ordinance
passed under said charter shall contain any provision inconsistent with the Constitution of the
A. The Disaster Act of 1975 & Executive Orders from Governor Abbott
27. On May 22, 1975 Governor Dolph Briscoe signed H.B. 2032 into law and the Texas
Disaster Act of 1975 (“Disaster Act”) was born.1 Since its 1987 re-codification, the Disaster Act
28. The Disaster Act was amended in 2005 following a year of heavy hurricane and flood
damage. The amendment’s intention was to allow county judges and mayors to order evacuations
and “control the movement of persons and the occupancy of premises” in damaged areas.3
29. The Disaster Act gives the Texas Governor broad powers in the case of an emergency,
purporting to give his pronouncements the force of law at § 418.012, and giving him the ability
to suspend laws if, based on his own judgment, they “prevent, hinder, or delay necessary action
30. The Disaster Act has rarely been invoked, and thus its deficiencies have not been obvious
until about March 20204, when the COVID-19 virus caused widespread alarm and executives all
31. Section 418.016 of the Act purports to give Gov. Abbott the power to suspend statutes
that hinder efforts to cope with a disaster; Gov. Abbott has vigorously exercised that alleged
1
Act of May 22, 1975, 64th R.S., H.B. 2032 (1975).
2
Act of May 21, 1987, 70th R.S., S.B. 894 (1987); Tex. Gov’t Code § 418.001 (“This chapter
may be cited as the Texas Disaster Act of 1975”).
3
Act of June 9, 2005, 79th R.S., H.B. 3111 (2005), adding Tex. Gov’t Code § 418.108(f)-(g).
4
All dates in this document occur in 2020 unless otherwise specified; all internet URLs last
checked August 12, 2020 or later.
Renneberg, et al. v. Greg Abbott, et al., Original Petition Page 6
B. The Governor’s Executive Orders separate families during their last days together.
32. Aline Renneberg has been a resident of San Gabriel Rehabilitation and Care Center in
Round Rock, Texas since September 2019. Aline Renneberg entered the nursing facility with her
husband, who died in July 2020 from COVID-19. Aline has been left to grieve the loss of her
husband alone, without the support or comfort of family. (See Exhibit C.)
33. Aline Renneberg suffers from dementia and also has diabetes. She is growing more and
more incoherent, confused, and aggressive daily. She no longer cares to eat. She has begun
34. Marcy Renneberg, Aline’s daughter and decision maker based on a medical power of
attorney, has been denied the right to enter San Gabriel Rehabilitation and Care Center to visit,
care for, observe, and provide comfort and companionship to her mother.
35. Before Governor Abbott’s orders and the rules and regulations promulgated by HHSC
and enforced by San Gabriel Rehabilitation and Care Center, Marcy would visit her mother
almost daily and care for her. She would check her skin for infections, cut and comb her hair, cut
and clean her fingernails and toenails, make appointments to see the podiatrist, bring her food
and make sure it was mashed so that Aline could eat it, put lotion on Aline’s skin, give her water
to keep her from being dehydrated. Marcy doubts the staff at San Gabriel Rehabilitation and
Care Center is able or willing to provide that level of care. Nor can she check on her mother to
36. Aline Renneberg cannot carry on a window or phone visit well because of her dementia.
Even if she could, it is no substitute for the in-person visit, care, companionship, and observation
she is entitled to by her daughter as a resident of San Gabriel Rehabilitation and Care Center.
37. Leland Webb is 85 years old and is a nursing home resident at Pine Arbor in Silsbee,
Texas. He has been married to his wife, Wanda, for 54 years. Leland suffers from dementia,
diabetes, and congestive heart failure. His health conditions require that he receive constant care
which Wanda cannot provide in her home. Leland has resided in Pine Arbor Nursing Facility
38. Wanda visited Leland regularly, at least several times per week, prior to Governor
Abbott’s orders. She provided hands-on care to him such as cutting his hair, trimming his nails,
and taking him snacks. She would also play games and listen to music with him. Leland was
very social, leaving his room to visit with other residents in the hallways and dining halls as
much as possible. Wanda’s help was integral to his care and well-being as well as his personal
comfort. She would check his legs for swelling and help him move to the recliner to elevate his
39. Leland wants to visit in-person with his wife, Wanda. Pine Arbor has denied that. Phone
calls are impossible because of Leland’s hearing issues. Window visits are also challenging,
again because of his hearing difficulties through a closed window. Though the facility provides
video communications whenever staff is available, there have been times when Leland and
Wanda have called requesting services and no one was available to accommodate the request.
Leland and Wanda Webb represent the situation of thousands of nursing home residents and their
40. Recently, when Wanda was waiting outside to have a window visit with Leland, she saw
a delivery driver arrive, have his temperature taken, then be allowed to enter to deliver supplies
to refill the vending machines inside the facility. (See Declaration of Wanda Webb.)
41. On March 19, 2020, Governor Abbott took drastic action in response to coronavirus cases
in Texas. Abandoning the elderly and infirm to survive in long-term care facilities without the
love, personal contact, and supportive care of their family members, Abbott issued Executive
Order GA-8 (GA-8), which closed nursing homes and other long-term care facilities to all
42. In Texas, nursing homes are regulated by the Texas Department of Health and Human
Services. Pursuant to GA-8 the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), under
executive director Cecile Young, guidelines to nursing homes provide that all visitors not
providing critical assistance must be prohibited from visiting residents of long-term care
facilities as these are among the most vulnerable of the state’s residents. Recent guidance from
43. Defendant Nursing Homes have implemented the HHS guidance to forbid all family
visitors no matter how integral their contact is to the resident’s care, except in “end-of-life” or
“failure to thrive” situations when certain very specific conditions are met.
5
https://hhs.texas.gov/sites/default/files/documents/doing-business-with-hhs/provider-
portal/long-term-care/nf/covid-response-nursing-facilities.pdf
Renneberg, et al. v. Greg Abbott, et al., Original Petition Page 9
C. Executive Order GA-28 and the recent “reopening” of Texas
44. Governor Abbott’s “Open Texas” plans issued on April 27, 2020 did not include any plan
for opening nursing homes for visits by family members. His current order, GA-28, states:
People shall not visit nursing homes, state supported living centers, assisted living
facilities, or long-term care facilities unless as determined through guidance from
the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC). Nursing homes,
state supported living centers, assisted living facilities, and long-term care
facilities should follow infection control policies and practices set forth by HHSC,
including minimizing the movement of staff between facilities whenever
possible;6
45. Initially, nursing homes were closed to protect the most vulnerable of the citizens in
Texas, as it is known that older patients who have comorbid conditions are more likely to
contract and develop complications from COVID-19. Protecting the lives and well-being of these
elderly and infirm residents of Texas is a noteworthy and laudable goal. However, COVID-19 is
not the only health concern facing these residents. As noted by psychologist Melanie Webb,
Leland Webb is already at risk for depressive episodes, which were many times managed with
interaction, human connection, etc. The absolute worst thing that any individual can do when
suffering from depression is isolate themselves from others. Social isolation is certain to
exacerbate depression, which in turn, will exacerbate any general medical conditions. E.g., Aline
Renneberg is growing more confused, incoherent, and even aggressive due to her isolation from
6
https://gov.texas.gov/uploads/files/press/EO-GA-28_targeted_response_to_reopening_COVID-
19.pdf
Renneberg, et al. v. Greg Abbott, et al., Original Petition Page 10
46. HHS has recently implemented Phase 1 visitation for nursing facilities, which does not
help the Plaintiffs in this lawsuit participate in in-person visits. The Phase 1 visitation guidelines7
allow only the following types of visitation and only if the facility is COVID-19 free among its
residents and no member of staff has tested positive for 14 consecutive days prior to opening.
47. The Phase 1 visitation rules ignore differences in nursing homes, but are unnecessarily
• Outdoor visits—A visit between a resident and one or more personal visitors
that occurs in-person in a dedicated outdoor space.
• Window visits—A personal visit between a visitor and a resident during which
the resident and personal visitor are separated by an open window.
• Vehicle parades—A visit between a resident and one or more personal visitors,
during which the resident remains outdoors on the facility property, and visitors
drive past in a vehicle.
• Compassionate Care Visits—A visit between one permanently designated visitor
and a resident experiencing a failure to thrive.8
48. While this small window of visitation may benefit a few residents, it does not allow
Plaintiffs in this case to have the personal visitation, care, and observation vital to the health and
well-being of their loved ones. Plaintiffs don’t need more outdoor visits without personal contact
and observation, especially in the sweltering Texas summer temperatures, where both patient and
family member could be at risk for complications arising from heat exposure.
49. Though these new rules promulgated by Defendant Young and HHS allow for an
extremely narrow exception designating a visitor for a resident who has been medically declared
as demonstrating “failure to thrive,” those visits may still only take place in facilities which meet
7
https://hhs.texas.gov/sites/default/files/documents/doing-business-with-hhs/provider-
portal/long-term-care/nf/covid-response-nursing-facilities.pdf
8
https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/public/regviewer$ext.RegPage?sl=R&app=1&p_dir=&p_rloc=3801
92&p_tloc=&p_ploc=&pg=1&p_reg=380192&ti=40&pt=1&ch=19&rl=2803&issue=08/21/202
0&z_chk=4937918&z_contains=nursing%20facility^^^
Renneberg, et al. v. Greg Abbott, et al., Original Petition Page 11
Phase I requirements. And if a single resident or employee tests positive for COVID-19, all
visitation, no matter how limited, will be denied. In the meantime, staff and employees come and
50. The narrow exception notwithstanding, no nursing home resident should have to reach
the point of “failing to thrive” before that resident is allowed to see his loved ones. Such a
51. If Defendants’ conduct is not restrained and declared unconstitutional, once this virus
passes, the rights enjoyed by Plaintiffs under the Texas Constitution will be irreparably damaged.
Indeed, many of these frail residents of nursing homes and other long-term care facilities may
not survive the isolation imposed upon them by the government. Viruses mutate, so there may be
a different coronavirus strain next year. The vulnerable residents of nursing homes cannot be
locked down forever. After over five months, the Governor and the HHSC have only recently
released any plans for allowing essential family visits to these Texas residents. These plans are
very limited and only allow outdoor visits with no physical contact, and do not satisfy the
concerns raised in this petition. Every day that Plaintiffs’ rights are tread upon via unlawful
shutdowns reinforces precedent for future unlawful governmental remedies related to virus and
disease management.
52. There appears to be no end in sight to such executive orders as long as the Governor
maintains a state of disaster, and effectively there can be no oversight of his actions as long as
the Governor refuses to call the Legislature to a special session. As of this filing, Legislators
must wait for the 2021 Legislative session to begin, under the current regime.
previous executive orders had a definitive end date or some form of deadline, but this order
leaves closed any hope that nursing homes might someday even open to essential family visits.
54. The Governor has not explained (much less with any rational basis) why staff and
employees can come and go from the nursing homes and other long-term care facilities and
mingle in the community, and yet family members who have a vested interest in protecting their
vulnerable loved ones from disease and in many instances have voluntarily quarantined
themselves may not visit those facilities. Leland Webb has now tested positive for COVID-19,
which must have come into Pine Arbor via a staff member or employee or maybe a vending
machine delivery man, since no family members are able to enter the facility. Clearly, the
policies defined in GA-28 are not preventing viral spread. They are, however, demonstrably
55. According to section 102.003(g) of the Texas Human Resources Code, “An elderly
individual is entitled to privacy while attending to personal needs and a private place for
receiving visitors or associating with other individuals unless providing privacy would infringe
on the rights of other individuals. This right applies to medical treatment, written
communications, telephone conversations, meeting with family, and access to resident councils.”
The Governor is impeding this right and is suspending this portion of the law without authority.
56. Further, the Governor of Texas does not have the power to suspend statutes as Article 1,
§ 28 of the Texas Constitution states, “No power of suspending laws in this State shall be
57. The Texas Disaster Act purports to allow the Governor to suspend regulatory statutes
having to do with the conduct of state businesses, but no language in the Act can be colorably
family visitors to provide for their well-being, companionship, and assist in their essential care.
58. The Texas Disaster Act was passed to deal with emergency situations caused by disasters.
It creates the Department of Emergency Management. However, it is a stretch to say that after
over five months, the Governor and Director of Health and Human Services are still operating in
an emergency situation. Certainly, the Governor could have called the Legislature into a special
session by now and passed laws tailored by the HHSC to meet the needs of Leland Webb,
allowing essential family visits under safe conditions. Or the Texas Legislature could hold
hearings and pass a law that requires the Plaintiffs to sacrifice after weighing the costs of such a
decision. Then at least an actual law would be passed by a representative body, rather than by a
59. Other states have opened nursing homes to family visits. For example, Minnesota has
implemented an “essential family caregiver” plan recognizing the vital role these family
members play in the well-being of nursing home residents.9 Minnesota allows family caregivers
to visit residents by using the same precautions expected of employees, including use of personal
protective equipment. Failure to follow strict rules can result in revocation of visitation.
Minnesota recognizes that visitation is an important component of caring for their nursing home
residents. The Minn. Comm’r of Health has stated, “By rolling out this guidance for essential
care providers, we are helping to build a more robust framework that providers can use to ensure
9
See Minn. Department of Health’s Essential Caregiver Guidance for Long-term Care Facilities;
see https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/hcp/ltccaregiver.pdf,
10
https://www.health.state.mn.us/news/pressrel/2020/covid071020.html.
Renneberg, et al. v. Greg Abbott, et al., Original Petition Page 14
VII. CLAIMS
60. Plaintiffs bring this claim and the following claims for declaratory relief under the
Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act. They also bring suit under City of El Paso v. Heinrich, 284
S.W.3d, 366, 368-369 (Tex. 2009), which authorizes ultra vires claims against public officials
61. Governor Abbott’s Order attempts to shut down Plaintiff Leland Webb and Aline
§102.003(g) and by preventing Plaintiff’s family members from exercising their medical powers
of attorney and/or guardianship rights to make informed decisions for their loved ones’ care. If
they are unable to see Plaintiff nursing home residents, observe them and the care they are
receiving, and speak to them, Plaintiff family members are inhibited from exercising this right to
make decisions in the patients’ best interest as recognized and required by section 166.152(e) of
62. The Governor’s orders are therefore attempts to suspend state law, a power which the
63. Article I, § 19 states that “[n]o citizen of this State shall be deprived of life, liberty,
property, privileges or immunities, or in any manner disenfranchised, except by the due course of
right, in a peaceable manner, to assemble together for their common good.” This is an inviolate
65. By terminating Plaintiffs’ rights to visit in person, even with reasonable restrictions
similar to those applied to staff of nursing homes, Defendants violate Article I, § 19 and §27 of
the Texas Constitution. Additionally, Plaintiffs have been deprived of the privilege and right to
have in-person visits and contact, a privilege and right recognized by the Texas Legislature at
66. The Governor and the HHSC have not exercised due process before depriving these
citizens of these rights. The Governor and the HHSC have a duty to provide adequate
opportunity for the Plaintiffs to present their case and defend their rights before removing them.
In similar cases where children are removed from the care of their parents, due process is
required. (See Tex. Fam. Code § 262.101.) In this case, however, the Governor and the HHSC
have promulgated decrees and regulations that are general, broad, and sweeping, but which have
no bearing on the actual condition and medical needs of the individual patient.
67. Section 2001.034 of the Texas Government Code allows the Texas Health and Human
Services Commission to adopt emergency rules “if an agency finds that an imminent peril to the
public health, safety, or welfare requires adoption of a rule on fewer than 30 days' notice.”
68. The HHSC relies on this provision for its rules11 which are depriving Plaintiff residents
of the right to receive visitors, resulting in their precipitous decline. Perhaps during the first two
weeks, even up to six weeks at the beginning of this coronavirus pandemic, the “emergency
11
https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/public/regviewer$ext.RegPage?sl=R&app=1&p_dir=&p_rloc=380
192&p_tloc=&p_ploc=&pg=1&p_reg=380192&ti=40&pt=1&ch=19&rl=2803&issue=08/21/20
20&z_chk=4937918&z_contains=nursing%20facility^^^.
Renneberg, et al. v. Greg Abbott, et al., Original Petition Page 16
exception” for rule-making might be considered viable and applicable. However, over five
months have elapsed and the rule-making process, which calls for public comment and input
69. Under the normal rule-making procedure as laid out in the Texas Administrative Code,
Title 26, the proposed rules are published in the Texas Register, adequate time for public
comment is allowed, advisory committees meet and review said proposals, and the Executive
70. In the case of nursing facilities, the HHSC has not followed the normal rule-making
procedure, even though one can reasonably conclude that our state is not operating under
imminent peril when over five months have elapsed since the declaration of a State of
Emergency. As such, the HHSC is violating the due process rights of the Plaintiffs by failing to
follow the statutorily mandated rule-making process before stripping Plaintiffs of their
constitutionally guaranteed rights to freely assemble with their loved ones and the statutorily
72. If the elected Legislature, the rightful lawmaking body of this State, is powerless to
deprive citizens of the right to assemble, the Governor, Executive Branch, and the HHSC cannot
assert such authority. And even if they could, they cannot claim that an emergency lasts until
right to assemble with their loved ones. The right to peaceably assemble for the common good is
considered a fundamental right and thus subject to a strict scrutiny test. To survive this Court’s
review, the government must prove that any limitation of that right is narrowly tailored to serve a
compelling government interest. Because the State has not done so, it violates the
constitutionally guaranteed rights of the plaintiffs. See Zaatari v. City of Austin, No. 03-17-
00812-CV, 2019, Tex. App. LEXIS 10290, (Tex. App. – Austin, 2019).
74. In this case, Plaintiffs have been deprived of the right to assemble together by the
Governor in his decree, by the HHSC in its guidelines, and by Defendant nursing homes, which
are state-Medicaid-funded providers. Defendants must show that they have narrowly tailored
their actions that resulted in this deprivation in order to advance compelling government interest.
75. While Defendants may argue that protecting vulnerable, elderly, and infirm persons
during a global pandemic is a compelling government interest, it cannot legitimately argue that it
narrowly tailored its policy. After five months, there is no longer an emergency situation and
there has been adequate time to tailor a policy to allow essential family visits by Plaintiff family
caregivers to see and care for Plaintiff Nursing Home Residents, Webb and Renneberg.
76. If staff and employees and even vending machine delivery men are allowed to come and
go daily, subject to temperature checks and wearing personal protection equipment, Defendants
must demonstrate how the sweeping prohibition against any in-person visitation is legally
acceptable given that it denies the Plaintiffs the right to assemble. Indeed, the sweeping
prohibition is not acceptable and must be narrowly tailored to pass strict scrutiny.
77. Defendants also violate the Texas Constitution, Art. 1, §28 which provides that, “No
power of suspending laws in this State shall be exercised except by the legislature.” Defendant
the requirements of Phase I), combined with the enforcement actions by his agents, is a de facto
suspension of the statutory provisions that protect the rights of nursing home residents to
privately receive visitors. Chapter 418 of the Texas Government Code cannot give the Defendant
authority to ignore the Texas Constitution; as even statutes passed by the Texas Legislature are
78. The restrictions cannot even pass a rational basis test. COVID-19 cases have clearly
entered nursing facilities through its employees. Defendants may argue that employees are
necessary for the health of nursing home residents, as there is no other option, an obvious truth.
But Defendants have taken the equally absurd position that no family visit as necessary for the
health of nursing home residents, when many nursing homes residents have received near daily
care from their loved ones, and that care has been the difference between life and death.
79. To prohibit all family visits, even by those willing to wear the same personal protective
equipment that the staff wears, based on the contention that the benefits of personal family visits
are not worth the risk of those visits has no rational basis. Nursing home residents often receive
actual health care during those visits. The State of Texas maintains an Ombudsman program
allowing ordinary to people who visit loved ones in nursing homes to identify negligent
80. Because Defendants have failed to provide due process before depriving Plaintiffs of
their rights, this Court should find and declare that the applicable section of GA-28 and relevant
12
See https://apps.hhs.texas.gov/news_info/ombudsman/. This Texas program allows any
interested adult to be certified as a volunteer watch dog to advocate for nursing home residents.
Renneberg, et al. v. Greg Abbott, et al., Original Petition Page 19
F. Claim 3 – Declaration -- Governor Abbott’s Order violates the Equal Protection
Clause of the Texas Constitution. Article I, § 3.
81. Governor Abbott’s Executive Order GA-28 picks and chooses winners and losers.
Winners include staff and employees who can enter the nursing home and return home, visit the
grocery store, and attend family gatherings while Plaintiff family caregivers lose by being kept
out and Plaintiff Nursing Home Residents lose by suffering neglect because their family
members cannot provide the essential care and attention they need. Residents of nursing homes
who are able to hear telephone calls, be taken outside or to a window benefit more than other
residents of nursing homes. Leland Webb and Aline Renneberg can do none of these because of
their physical and mental disabilities. This is patently unequal. Unfortunately for Plaintiffs and
others similarly situated, they have been relegated to Governor Abbott’s loser category and
sentenced to isolation and heartbreak. The Governor and HHSC have a duty to promulgate
regulations that provide equal protection to all groups involved – employees of nursing homes,
of Rights, is arbitrary, and violates the Texas Constitution. GA-28 does not pass strict scrutiny
might possibly exist.” Indeed, our rights are MOST important during times of emergencies! As
noted in In re Abbott, “The Constitution is not suspended when the government declares a state
of disaster.” In re Abbott, No. 20-0291, 2020 WL 1943226, at *1 (Tex. Apr. 23, 2020).
84. The sections of the Texas Bill of Rights that GA-28 violates by “suspending” laws
include Sections 19 (privileges and due process) and 27 (assembly). Abbott also illegally
suspends the laws guaranteeing the rights of Plaintiffs Webb and Renneberg to receive visitors.
Governor Abbott can claim all day that the legislature gave him “broad powers.” However, those
powers that Abbott claims to have, whatever they may be, cannot supersede the rights guaranteed
85. Also, the executive orders by Abbott and enforcement by HHSC and Defendant Nursing
Homes are arbitrary because they have no rational basis. How can it be rational that staff and
employees of nursing homes, and even vending machine delivery men, can come and go from
the nursing facilities subject to temperature checks, screenings, and wearing personal protective
equipment, but loving family members who are motivated not to bring COVID-19 to their fragile
loved ones residing in nursing homes can not be allowed to do so under the same guidelines?
This distinction between employees and essential family caregivers is irrational and arbitrary,
time. In fact, the Texas Legislature spoke on the issue of communicable diseases such as
COVID-19 in 1989 when it passed Chapter 81 of the Texas Health and Safety Code, known as
87. The Act states clearly that the primary person responsible is the individual. “Each person
shall act responsibly to prevent and control communicable disease.” In doing so, the Texas
Legislature understood that it is not the Governor or HHSC that is primarily responsible for a
particular individual’s health and decisions related thereto, but it is the duty of the individual and
88. The Act anticipates the need for testing, the right to enter and inspect facilities, and to
implement control measures, like quarantines, to prevent the spread of disease. However,
crucially important is the fact that the Texas Legislature only allowed those control measures to
be in place for up to 60 days. Texas Health & Safety Code §81.082(d) The State is well beyond
150 days at this point. The remedy is not for the Governor and HHSC to continue exercising
authority beyond what is allowed, but to call on the Legislature to extend that authority if they
deem it necessary.
89. Governor Abbott through his order, HHSC through its guidelines, and Defendant Nursing
Homes through their practices are violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Both Title II and Title III of the ADA and Section 504 require that
medical care providers provide individuals with disabilities full and equal access to their health
care services and facilities; and reasonable modifications to policies, practices, and procedures
when necessary to make health care services fully available to individuals with disabilities,
unless the modifications would fundamentally alter the nature of the services. They also prohibit
these nursing facilities from discriminating against disabled persons by denying them the
90. As recipients of Medicaid Services by the state of Texas, residents of commercial nursing
facilities, and as persons who have physical and mental impairments that substantially limit their
major life activities, Leland Webb and Aline Renneberg are entitled to the protections of the
ADA Title II & III. Webb is disabled in having Alzheimer’s disease, which inhibits his decision
making ability. Renneberg has dementia which causes her to become confused and sometimes
renders her unable to even press the help button to call staff in to help her with personal and
medical needs. Webb also has physical impairments requiring the use of a wheelchair and that
limit his movements and ability to function independently. Both plaintiffs have trouble
understanding and effectively communicating via “virtual visits” and phone calls.
91. Webb’s wife, Wanda and Renneberg’s daughter, Marcy, need to be a regular part of their
health care routine and their medical care decision making as their medical powers of attorney
and guardians. They cannot carry out this duty adequately without attending to their loved ones
in person and observing their care and condition. Even the small concessions of “Phase I
Visitation” recently made by Defendant Young and Former Director Wilson are not sufficient to
cure this defect and violation of the ADA and Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Essential family
caregivers are still unable to visit Plaintiffs in the facility where they reside and the provision for
“virtual” visits does not provide equal access to them as to others who are not as severely
92. The Texas Legislature recognized in passing Chapter 48 of the Texas Human Resources
Code that the elderly and disabled deserve special protection from abuse and neglect because
93. The adopted definition of abuse includes “unreasonable confinement” and the definition
of neglect includes “the failure to provide for one’s self the goods or services, including medical
services, which are necessary to avoid physical or emotional harm or pain or the failure of a
caretaker to provide such goods or services.” Texas Human Resources Code §48.002a (2) & (4).
94. Skilled nursing facility employees and staff have a duty to report the abuse and neglect of
their elderly residents, and HHSC has a duty to investigate and remedy those reports. The one-
size-fits none approach that the state has taken with its sweeping orders over the last five months
has left no room for remedying the many cases, including those of Leland Webb and Aline
Renneberg, of abuse and neglect of the elderly in unreasonable confinement and deprivation.
95. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), which regulates Defendant
Nursing Homes on the federal level, is governed by regulation §483.10 titled “Resident Rights”
and states “The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and
communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. A facility
must protect and promote the rights of each resident... Visit and be visited by others from outside
the facility.”13 Further, it states that “A facility must promote the exercise of rights for each
resident, including any who face barriers (such as communication problems, hearing problems
13
https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-
Guidance/Guidance/Transmittals/downloads/R70SOMA.pdf
Renneberg, et al. v. Greg Abbott, et al., Original Petition Page 24
and cognition limits) in the exercise of these rights. A resident, even though determined to be
incompetent, should be able to assert these rights based on his or her degree of capability.”
96. Clearly, the federal government recognizes the important right of nursing home residents
to have visits by their loved ones, who are essential to their care and well-being. Defendant
Nursing Homes are violating this fundamental and important right of Plaintiff nursing home
residents who face barriers to using alternate forms of communication and who are essentially
imprisoned in their last days in a nursing facility without the ability to see their loved ones.
97. CMS Regulation 483.13(b) “Abuse: The resident has the right to be free from verbal,
sexual, physical, and mental abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion.” It goes on
98. Again, the federal government in its regulations recognizes that involuntary seclusion of
nursing home residents is tantamount to abuse. In this case, Defendant Nursing Homes are
involuntarily secluding Plaintiff residents from others, specifically their loved ones, against their
will and the will of their legal representatives. The “emergency” argument cannot be maintained
with any integrity as over 150 days have elapsed since the seclusion orders were put in place, and
the seclusion of Plaintiff residents is resulting in real injury in the form of agitation and decline
99. Defendant Nursing Homes have a duty under the contract terms it entered into with
Leland and Wanda Webb and Marcy and Aline Renneberg to abide by the government
regulations which govern them, to provide safe and quality care, and to provide opportunities for
Plaintiff nursing home residents to receive visitors and have access to the care and critical
attention only their family members can provide. Under the Governor’s order (GA-28),
Defendant Nursing Homes are failing. They are often short-handed and by not allowing
Plaintiffs’ loved ones to visit, they are harming, neglecting, and abusing the Plaintiff residents in
their care. Defendant Nursing Homes could have designated Wanda Webb for Leland Webb and
Marcy Renneberg for Aline Renneberg as essential to the residents’ care and allowed them to
enter under GA-28 and following the same guidelines and sanitary conditions as its employees
and staff and even vending machine delivery men. Because they have not done so, they are in
violation of their contract to provide services to the Plaintiff nursing home residents in their care
L. Claim 9 -- Declaration -- San Gabriel and Pine Arbor nursing homes are violating
Title 40, Rules §§ 19.401 and 19.402 of the Texas Administrative Code by denying
the right to visitors to their residents.
100. Rule § 19.401 of the Texas Administrative Code enumerates the protected rights of
nursing home residents. Specifically, paragraph (c) outlines these rights including the right to
“(16) receive visitors”. (See Exhibit H) Additionally, Rule § 19.402 states, “(b) The resident has
the right to be free of interference, coercion, discrimination, or reprisal from the facility in
14
https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/public/readtac$ext.TacPage?sl=R&app=9&p_dir=&p_rloc=&p_tlo
c=&p_ploc=&pg=1&p_tac=&ti=40&pt=1&ch=19&rl=402
Renneberg, et al. v. Greg Abbott, et al., Original Petition Page 26
101. There is no contradiction with earlier Title 26 Rule § 506.3, which states, “(2) the right of
the patient, in collaboration with his or her physician, to make decisions involving his or her
health care; [...] (12) the right to receive visitors at reasonable hours, within reasonable
limitations, as may be required by the facility in its operation policies.” Three reasons exist
which confirm Title 40’s provisions and the violation in this case. First, Plaintiff residents are
guaranteed the right to have a say in their health care plans. Plaintiff residents and their legal
medical decision makers are willing and desire to forego the so-called “preventative measures”
such as a total isolation from visitors. Second, the right enumerated relates to limiting visits to
certain hours of operation, not whether or not the right may be wholly denied. Finally and most
importantly, the provisions of Title 40, Section 19.402 were amended to take effect in March
2020 while Title 26, Section 506.33 was adopted to be effective in 2004, meaning the later
102. Given these facts, the Defendants Pine Arbor and San Gabriel are violating the protected
rights of nursing home residents by denying them their right to receive visitors, which constitutes
“interference” with the exercise of that right. This court should declare that Defendant Nursing
Homes are violating the HHS rules protecting Plaintiff residents’ rights to receive visitors.
103. Based on the irreparable harm (and imminent danger of Plaintiffs’ death) caused by
Defendant Abbott’s executive orders, Defendant Young’s rules and regulations, and Defendant
Nursing Homes enforcement of those orders and rules, Plaintiffs seek a temporary restraining
order (“TRO”), temporary injunction, and permanent injunction against Governor Abbott, HHS
Commissioner Cecile Young, and Defendant Nursing Homes prohibiting them from enforcing
GA-28 and all HHS Emergency Rules limiting in-person visitors until such time as the legitimate
laws should be passed and enforced regarding these matters, and further, to immediately allow
104. To obtain a temporary injunction, an applicant must plead and prove: “(1) a cause of
action against the defendant; (2) a probable right to the relief sought; and (3) a probable,
imminent, and irreparable injury in the interim.” Butnaru v. Fort Motor Car Co., 284 S.W.3d
105. The Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act and City of El Paso v. Heinrich, 284 S.W.3d
366-368-69 (Tex. 2009) each provide Plaintiffs with a cause of action to seek declaratory and
106. Plaintiffs have a probable right to relief because the Defendants conduct violates the
Texas Constitution, state statutes, and the Americans with Disabilities Act.
107. Plaintiffs are currently suffering and will continue to suffer probable, imminent, and
irreparable injury absent a temporary restraining order and temporary injunction because the
Defendants are trampling on Plaintiffs’ rights protected by the Texas Constitution and are
exceeding Defendants’ authority under the Texas Disaster Act (Texas Gov’t Code §418.011).
108. Nursing home resident plaintiffs’ lives are at stake, and time is of the essence. Provision
must be made to allow essential family caregivers to enter the facilities and provide personal care
to their loved ones. Nursing homes must be ordered to allow these visits under the same
conditions that they allow their employees and staff to enter and care for the residents.
109. Plaintiff seeks recovery of its reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees pursuant to
Chapters37 & 38 et seq of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code.
the ADA pursuant to 42 USCS § 12133 and 29 USCS §794a. (“In any action or proceeding to
enforce or charge a violation of a provision of this title [29 USCS §§ 790 et seq.], the court, in its
discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney’s
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiffs respectfully pray for the following relief:
i) declare GA-08 and GA-28 unconstitutional, as well as the referenced associated regulations
mentioned herein issued by HHSC to enforce GA-08 and -28;
ii) temporarily restrain the Governor, Executive Director of HHSC, and Defendant Nursing
Homes from enforcing the aforementioned broad and unconstitutional orders;
iii) issue a temporary and permanent injunction allowing for safe and limited family visits for
essential family caregivers who are willing to follow the same safety and health protocols
and staff and employees;
vii) grant all additional relief to which Plaintiffs may be entitled at law or equity, including
invalidation of other sections of the Disaster Act as appropriate.
County, Texas.
born and raised in the Beaumont area. I graduated from Lumberton High School in 1987. I am
the daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Leland M. Webb and I am writing this declaration to share my
experiences as an adult child of a nursing home resident in Texas in 2020. I will also offer my
professional perspective on the risks to mental health on the nursing home population and my
personal observations on the negative impact that my father being in a nursing home has had on
both my parents.
2. My father, Leland Webb, was born and raised in Port Arthur, Texas, where he graduated
from Thomas Jefferson High School in 1953. While in high school, he played team sports
including football and baseball. After high school, he served in the United States Army where he
continued to participate in sports. Later in his adulthood, he would also serve as a weekend
warrior for the United States Army National Guard. However, immediately upon completion of
his term in the army, my father learned his trade and became an electrician and worked out of his
local International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local Union 479 until he retired
3. Outside of work and for the duration of his adult life, my father was heavily involved in
his church life. In fact, it was at a church party for single adults that my father met my mother in
October 1965, and they started dating. They were married on May 27, 1966 and are still married
to this day. The only times that they had been physically separated were on the occasions in
Exhibit B
which my father had to travel away from home to work when work assignments out of the Local
479 was slow, but even then, there were times when my mother traveled with him. Nevertheless,
my father’s service to his church included teaching classes and leading certain aspects of worship
such as prayer, song, and communion, as well as serving the Lumberton Church of Christ as a
deacon and then as an elder until he once again had to travel to work. Regardless, no matter
whether he was at work, at church, with family, etc. he was always a VERY SOCIABLE
PERSON.
4. Upon his retirement, he became even more involved in the social aspects of his church
life, spending much of his time at the church building, hanging out with friends and playing 42,
his favorite dominoes game, as well as serving the community by working in the “sharing and
caring center”, which was an outreach, church-sponsored program. In addition to time spent with
other retirees at the church, my father would often go out into the community, eat at Waffle
House, Burger King, and other establishments where he could hang out, have breakfast or coffee,
and visit/socialize with other patrons and employees. During his retirement, he remained a
5. Unfortunately, my father has struggled with some health problems along the way
especially when he reached his 60s. He was diagnosed with Type II Diabetes and struggled some
with Hypertension. In 2005, he even experienced a bout of bladder cancer; however, he had
surgery to remove the cancer and was able to fully recover. In addition, from the time he was
about 25 years old, my father suffered from a psychiatric disorder that resulted in symptoms of
depression, which at times became quite severe. Because of advances in the treatment of mental
illnesses and the effectiveness of newer generation of medications, the mental illness was always
managed well enough so that my father could work, be active in church, and socialize without
Exhibit B
significant problems interacting with others. Nevertheless, the symptoms of depression were
always and continues to be an ongoing battle as with all who suffer from chronic depressive
disorders.
6. In January 2011, when my father was 75 years old, doctors added Alzheimer’s Disease to
his list of medical conditions. I will say that, as a psychologist, I questioned the validity of this
particular diagnosis because he just did not have many of the classic symptoms and did not
experience a steady decline that you would expect to see in an average Alzheimer’s patient;
nonetheless, my father did experience a type of cognitive decline and in my opinion, he does
suffer from a type of dementia, probably vascular in nature. From 2011 to present, he has
demonstrated further deterioration in overall health eventually leading to his inability to perform
activities of daily living (ADLs) as well as becoming incontinent. Although he was afforded
some home health assistance, his condition declined to the point at which he needed round-the-
clock care as looking after him was just physically impossible for my mother to do on her own.
7. As would be expected, discussions occurred around the potential need for nursing home
placement. Conversations occurred on this issue between my mother, my sister, and me, as well
as a couple of extended family members who offered their input and insight into the matter.
Ultimately, we all agreed that placement in a skilled nursing facility was the best option. The
main reason for this was because my mother was not able to physically meet my father’s needs;
however, the second-most important reason for placement was that, at home and unable to get
out and about in the community as before, my father was socially isolated and spent his days
sitting in a recliner, watching television, without outside social contacts and/or activities. We
firmly believed that being around so many other people in a nursing and having opportunities to
8. The point came at which time we informed my father of our thoughts and position on
nursing home placement for him. As one might expect, his initial reaction was not positive, and
he expressed an aversion to the idea. However, being presented with the idea that he would have
opportunities to socialize with others and have constant contact with residents, staff members,
and visits from outside, he seemed ok with the plan and even agreed that he would enjoy being
around others. When it was time for him to move into his new facility, he went without
resistance and became a permanent resident of Pine Arbor in Silsbee, Texas. From July 2, 2018,
the day that he moved in, until October 1, 2019, my father enjoyed almost daily visits from my
mother and occasional visits from other family members and friends. In addition, my mother was
able to sign him out from the facility for outings to eat at restaurants, get ice cream, just to ride
around in the car, to visit extended family for dinner, and to go to church. In fact, when the
weather permitted, he attended church almost every week for approximately two to four months
until my mother started to have some health problems and was not feeling well enough to handle
9. Regardless, my mother continued her regular visits to the nursing home although she had
to decrease the frequency to three to four times per week or every other day. In addition, others
including children, grandchildren, other extended family members and friends continued
occasional visits to the facility. Further, my father was engaged with other residents and staff
members in the facility frequently moving around in common areas, interacting with others. He
was happy! In early March 2020, nursing home officials began to conduct screenings at the door
for visitors, but my mother continued her visits, answering the screening questions, until the
facility was ordered to close the doors altogether to outside visits around March 17, 2020.
Exhibit B
10. Initially, the “no visits” policy was thought to be temporary; therefore, we were not
terribly concerned. After all, we had been told that all the restrictions and changes, closing of
businesses, urges to stay at home, requests to wear masks, social distancing, etc., was to last for
approximately two weeks in order to “flatten the curve” and “take the pressure off ‘frontline
healthcare workers’” However, two weeks turned into a month, which turned into two months,
and so on, until now we are currently almost five months into this situation and my mother has
not been allowed any access at all to the inside of Pine Arbor. The closest she and others have
come to a face-to-face visit has been through a closed window, standing outside in the heat,
humidity, rain, grass, mud, mosquitos, or whatever other conditions are created by a Southeast
Texas summer.
11. As one can imagine, these visits do not occur that often or last long as these are not ideal
healthy conditions for my mother who is 80 years old and has her own recent history of health
concerns. The next best thing is FaceTime conversations, which also have their limits in terms of
contact and connection. Regular phone conversations are simply out of the question due to my
father being hard of hearing and unable to communicate at all without video. Even more
recently, the facility has begun to have some COVID-19 tests of staff members and residents
return positive results. In response to this, the facility officials have further restricted residents to
their own rooms and have even at times had them wearing face masks. Almost ALL my father’s
social interactions and connections to other human beings have been halted.
12. For an individual who thrives on socialization and interactions with others, this is
incredibly inappropriate and detrimental to my father’s overall health. He has remained confused
as to the reasons for my mother not coming inside to visit as she always did. During some of his
window visits and FaceTime conversations, he has become agitated, asking why she is not
Exhibit B
coming inside. Although he has been told several times that the facility is not allowed to let her
in, he never seems to remember the explanations he has been offered and has asked multiple
times. My father is no longer happy. He is already at risk for depressive episodes, which were
many times managed with interaction, human connection, etc. The absolute worst thing that any
individual can do when suffering from depression is isolate themselves from others. Social
isolation is certain to exacerbate depression, which in turn, will exacerbate any general medical
conditions. Most recently, my father even refused an opportunity to get out of bed to see my
mother through the window. Not only is social interaction extremely important for individuals
struggling with depression, cognitive stimulation is also incredibly important for my father due
to the dementia. Cognitive stimulation is necessary for anyone suffering from dementia to slow
the decline and to enhance the quality of life; therefore, extending the life span and improving
the prognosis.
13. As a clinical psychologist, I have worked primarily in forensic settings and in a capacity
that involves mental health as it applies to the law; however, from 2008-2010, I had the
opportunity to partner with two companies that contracted to provide mental health care to
residents in nursing homes. For those two years, I entered nursing facilities daily and worked
with residents and their family members providing psychotherapy. As a clinical psychologist, I
can tell you that one of the most detrimental aspects of leaving home and entering a nursing
facility is the separation from family and the isolation at which it puts residents at risk. I have
seen many individuals, even those who do not have a history of depressive disorders, fall victim
to depression after entering a facility due to the separation. It is quite common for individuals to
decline rapidly and enter into their final days when they are placed in a nursing home from the
maladjustment to the change in and of itself. This is especially true if family members do not
Exhibit B
stay involved in their loved ones’ care. It is also common for this situation to lead to cognitive
decline. Often nursing home residents slip into a depressive state due to lost independence,
perceived loss of dignity, loneliness, and lack of cognitive stimulation. This is true for the
average individual and especially true for those who enter the facility with a history of
14. The single most important thing that I would recommend as a clinical psychologist who
has worked with the nursing home population is to keep the families involved as much as
possible in the residents’ care. The next most important thing would be to make every effort to
keep the resident engaged in the social activities offered within the facility. In order to thrive and
cognitive stimulation, and family involvement. In order to accomplish this, they need to see
unmasked smiling human faces. They need physical contact (e.g. hugging, handholding, eye
contact, etc. with loved ones). They need stimulating conversation with others in the same room.
Simply put, they need unlimited and unrestricted human interaction. Yet, despite our
understanding of the importance of these things, nursing home residents have been cut off from
family members over an extended period of time in a way that has devastating effects.
15. In conclusion, restricting visits of nursing home residents from their families is wrong on
many levels. It causes serious harm to the residents’ mental health, which negatively affects their
physical health. It is harmful to the residents themselves but is harmful to their family members
as well. In a reported effort to protect nursing home residents from one thing, COVID-19, the
state has placed them in harm’s way, endangering them with other ill effects resulting from their
response to COVID-19. The side effects of these restrictions will inevitably cause more health
problems, mental and physical, as well as more death than COVID-19 ever could.
Exhibit B
2020.
______________________________________
MELANIE F. WEBB
Exhibit C
Exhibit C
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Pursuant to his powers as Governor of the State of Texas, Greg Abbott has issued the following:
Respectfully submitted,
S
to the Governor
Attachment
PosT OFFIcE Box 12428 AusTIN, TEXAS 78711 512-463-2000 (VOICE) DIAL 7-1-1 foR RELAY SERVICES
Exhibit D
xrruthn rbrr
BY THE
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF TEXAS
Executive Department
Austin, Texas
March 19, 2020
EXECUTIVE ORDER
GAO$
WHEREAS, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has advised
that person-to-person contact heightens the risk of COVID-19 transmission; and
WHEREAS, the Texas Department of State Health Services has now determined
that, as of March 19, 2020, COVID- 19 represents a public health disaster within
the meaning of Chapter 81 of the Texas Health and Safety Code; and
WHEREAS, under the Texas Disaster Act of 1975, “[t]he governor is responsible
for meeting . the dangers to the state and people presented by disasters”
. .
(Section 418.001 of the Texas Government Code), and the legislature has given
the governor broad authority to fulfill that responsibility.
MAR 1 9 2020
Exhibit D
Order No. 1 In accordance with the Guidelines from the President and the
CDC, every person in Texas shall avoid social gatherings in
groups of more than 10 people.
Order No. 2 In accordance with the Guidelines from the President and the
CDC, people shall avoid eating or drinking at bars, restaurants,
and food courts, or visiting gyms or massage parlors; provided,
however, that the use of drive-thru, pickup, or delivery options
is allowed and highly encouraged throughout the limited
duration of this executive order.
Order No. 3 In accordance with the Guidelines from the President and the
CDC, people shall not visit nursing homes or retirement or
long-term care facilities unless to provide critical assistance.
Order No. 4 In accordance with the Guidelines from the President and the
CDC, schools shall temporarily close.
This, executive order does not prohibit people from visiting a variety of places,
including grocery stores, gas stations, parks, and banks, so long as the necessary
precautions are maintained to reduce the transmission of COVID-19. This
executive order does not mandate sheltering in place. All critical infrastructure
will remain operational, domestic travel will remain unrestricted, and government
entities and businesses will continue providing essential services. For offices and
workplaces that remain open, employees should practice good hygiene and, where
feasible, work from home in order to achieve optimum isolation from COVD-19.
The more that people reduce their public contact, the sooner COVID-19 will be
contained and the sooner this executive order will expire.
This executive order supersedes all previous orders on this matter that are in
conflict or inconsistent with its terms, and this order shall remain in effect and in
full force until 11:59 p.m. on April 3, 2020, subject to being extended, modified,
amended, rescinded, or superseded by me or by a succeeding governor.
/€
GREG ABBOTT
,-
Governor
ATTEST LY.
UTH R. HUGHS
Secretary of State
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
SECRETARY OF STATE
1155M4 O’CLOCK
MAR 19 2020
Exhibit E
Pursuant to his powers as Governor of the State of Texas, Greg Abbott has issued the following:
Executive Order No. GA-18 relating to the expanded reopening of services as part
of the safe, strategic plan to Open Texas in response to the COVID- 19 disaster.
Respectfully submitted,
S
ye Clerk to the Governor
GSD/gsd
Attachment
POST OFFICE Box 12428 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 512-463-2000 (VOICE) DIAL 7-1-1 foR RELAY SERVICES
Exhibit E
xrcuthir iIrrr
BY THE
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF TEXAS
Executive Department
Austin, Texas
April 27, 2020
EXECUTIVE ORDER
GA18
Relating to the expaizded reopening of services as part of the safe, strategic plan to
Open Texas in response to the COVID-19 disaster.
WHEREAS, on April 12, 2020, I issued a proclamation renewing the disaster declaration
for all counties in Texas; and
WHEREAS, I have issued executive orders and suspensions of Texas laws in response to
COVID-19, aimed at protecting the health and safety of Texans and ensuring an
effective response to this disaster; and
WHEREAS, I issued Executive Order GA-08 on March 19, 2020, mandating certain
obligations for Texans in accordance with the President’s Coronavirus Guidelines for
America, as promulgated by President Donald J. Trump and the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) on March 16, 2020, which called upon Americans to take
actions to slow the spread of COVID-19 for 15 days; and
WHEREAS, shortly before Executive Order GA-08 expired, I issued Executive Order
GA- 14 on March 31, 2020, based on the President’s announcement that the restrictive
social-distancing Guidelines should extend through April 30, 2020, in light of advice
from Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx, and also based on guidance by DSHS
Commissioner Dr. Hellerstedt and Dr. Birx that the spread of COVD-19 can be reduced
by minimizing social gatherings; and
WHEREAS, Executive Order GA-14 superseded Executive Order GA-08 and expanded
the social-distancing restrictions and other obligations for Texans that are aimed at
slowing the spread of COVID- 19, including by limiting social gatherings and in-person
contact with people (other than those in the same household) to providing or obtaining
“essential services,” and by expressly adopting federal guidance that provides a list of
critical-infrastructure sectors, workers, and functions that should continue as “essential
services” during the COVID-19 response; and
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
SECRETARY OF STATE
t PNX O’CLOCK
APR 2? 2020
Exhibit E
WHEREAS, after more than two weeks of having in effect the heightened restrictions
like those required by Executive Order GA-14, which have saved lives, it was clear that
the disease still presented a serious threat across Texas that could persist in certain areas,
but also that COVID-19 had wrought havoc on many Texas businesses and workers
affected by the restrictions that were necessary to protect human life; and
WHEREAS, on April 17, 2020, I therefore issued Executive Order GA-l7, creating the
Governor’s Strike Force to Open Texas to study and make recommendations on safely
and strategically restarting and revitalizing all aspects of the Lone Star State—work,
school, entertainment, and culture; and
WHEREAS, also on April 17, 2020, I issued Executive Order GA-16 to replace
Executive Order GA- 14, and while Executive Order GA- 16 generally continued through
April 30, 2020, the same social-distancing restrictions and other obligations for Texans
according to federal guidelines, it offered a safe, strategic first step to Open Texas,
including permitting retail pick-up and delivery services; and
WHEREAS, Executive Order GA-16 is set to expire at 11:59 p.m. on April 30, 2020; and
WHEREAS, Texas must continue to protect lives while restoring livelihoods, both of
which can be achieved with the expert advice of medical professionals and business
leaders; and
WHEREAS, the “governor is responsible for meeting the dangers to the state and
...
people presented by disasters” under Section 418.0 11 of the Texas Government Code,
and the legislature has given the governor broad authority to fulfill that responsibility;
and
WHEREAS, under Section 418.012, the “governor may issue executive orders
hav[ingl the force and effect of law;” and
WHEREAS, under Section 4 18.016(a), the “governor may suspend the provisions of any
regulatory statute prescribing the procedures for conduct of state business if strict
...
compliance with the provisions ...would in any way prevent, hinder, or delay necessary
action in coping with a disaster;” and
WHEREAS, under Section 4 18.017(a), the “governor may use all available resources of
state government and of political subdivisions that are reasonably necessary to cope with
a disaster;” and
WHEREAS, under Section 4 18.018(c), the “governor may control ingress and egress to
and from a disaster area and the movement of persons and the occupancy of premises in
the area;” and
WHEREAS, under Section 4 18.173, failure to comply with any executive order issued
during the COVID-19 disaster is an offense punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000,
confinement in jail for a term not to exceed 180 days, or both fine and confinement.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas, by virtue of the power and
authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the State of Texas, do hereby order
the following on a statewide basis effective immediately, and continuing through May 15,
2020, subject to extension based on the status of COVID-19 in Texas and the
APR 2? 2020
Exhibit E
recommendations of the Governor’s Strike Force to Open Texas, the White House
Coronavirus Task Force, and the CDC:
1_n accordance with guidance from DSHS Commissioner Dr. Hellerstedt, and to achieve
the goals established by the President to reduce the spread of COVD-19, every person in
Texas shall, except where necessary to provide or obtain essential services or reopened
services, minimize social gatherings and minimize in-person contact with people who
are not in the same household. People over the age of 65, however, are strongly
encouraged to stay at home as much as possible; to maintain appropriate distance from
any member of the household who has been out of the residence in the previous 14 days;
and, if leaving the home, to implement social distancing and to practice good hygiene,
environmental cleanliness, and sanitation.
“Reopened services” shall consist of the following to the extent they are not already
“essential services:”
1. Retail services that may be provided through pickup, delivery by mail, or delivery
to the customer’s doorstep.
2. Starting at 12:01 a.m. on Friday, May 1, 2020:
a) In-store retail services, for retail establishments that operate at up to 25
percent of the total listed occupancy of the retail establishment.
b) Dine-in restaurant services, for restaurants that operate at up to 25 percent of
the total listed occupancy of the restaurant; provided, however, that (a) this
applies only to restaurants that have less than 51 percent of their gross receipts
from the sale of alcoholic beverages and are therefore not required to post the
51 percent sign required by Texas law as determined by the Texas Alcoholic
Beverage Commission, and (b) valet services are prohibited except for
vehicles with placards or plates for disabled parking.
c) Movie theaters that operate at up to 25 percent of the total listed occupancy of
any individual theater for any screening.
d) Shopping malls that operate at up to 25 percent of the total listed occupancy of
the shopping mall; provided, however, that within shopping malls, the food-
court dining areas, play areas, and interactive displays and settings must
remain closed.
e) Museums and libraries that operate at up to 25 percent of the total listed
occupancy; provided, however, that (a) local public museums and local public
libraries may so operate only if permitted by the local government, and (b) any
components of museums or libraries that have interactive functions or
exhibits, including child play areas, must remain closed.
t) For Texas counties that have filed with DSHS, and are in compliance with, the
requisite attestation form promulgated by DSHS regarding five or fewer cases
of COVID- 19, those in-store retail services, dine-in restaurant services, movie
theaters, shopping malls, and museums and libraries, as otherwise defined and
limited above, may operate at up to 50 percent (as opposed to 25 percent) of
APR 2? 2020
Exhibit E
The conditions and limitations set forth above for reopened services shall not apply to
essential services. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the governor may by
proclamation identify any county or counties in which reopened services are thereafter
prohibited, in the governor’s sole discretion, based on the governor’s determination in
consultation with medical professionals that only essential services should be permitted
in the county, including based on factors such as an increase in the transmission of
COVTD-l 9 or in the amount of COVID- 19-related hospitalizations or fatalities.
Religious services should be conducted in accordance with the joint guidance issued and
updated by the attorney general and governor.
People shall avoid visiting bars, gyms, public swimming pools, interactive amusement
venues such as bowling alleys and video arcades, massage establishments, tattoo studios,
piercing studios, or cosmetology salons. The use of drive-thru, pickup, or delivery
options for food and drinks remains allowed and highly encouraged throughout the
limited duration of this executive order.
This executive order does not prohibit people from accessing essential or reopened
services or engaging in essential daily activities, such as going to the grocery store or gas
station, providing or obtaining other essential or reopened services, visiting parks,
hunting or fishing, or engaging in physical activity like jogging, bicycling, or other
outdoor sports, so long as the necessary precautions are maintained to reduce the
transmission of COVID-19 and to minimize in-person contact with people who are not
in the same household.
In accordance with the Guidelines from the President and the CDC, people shall not visit
nursing homes, state supported living centers, assisted living facilities, or long-term care
facilities unless to provide critical assistance as determined through guidance from the
Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC). Nursing homes, state
supported living centers, assisted living facilities, and long-term care facilities should
follow infection control policies and practices set forth by the HHSC, including
minimizing the movement of staff between facilities whenever possible.
In accordance with the Guidelines from the President and the CDC, schools shall remain
temporarily closed to in-person classroom attendance by students and shall not
APR 2? 2020
Exhibit E
recommence before the end of the 2019-2020 school year. Public education teachers and
staff are encouraged to continue to work remotely from home if possible, but may return
to schools to conduct remote video instruction, as well as perform administrative duties,
under the strict terms required by the Texas Education Agency. Private schools and
institutions of higher education should establish similar terms to allow teachers and staff
to return to schools to conduct remote video instruction and perform administrative
duties when it is not possible to do so remotely from home.
This executive order shall supersede any conflicting order issued by local officials in
response to the COVID-19 disaster, but only to the extent that such a local order restricts
essential services or reopened services allowed by this executive order, allows gatherings
prohibited by this executive order, or expands the list of essential services or the list or
scope of reopened services as set forth in this executive order. I hereby suspend Sections
418.1015(b) and 418.10$ of the Texas Government Code, Chapter 81, Subchapter E of
the Texas Health and Safety Code, and any other relevant statutes, to the extent
necessary to ensure that local officials do not impose restrictions inconsistent with this
executive order, provided that local officials may enforce this executive order as well as
local restrictions that are consistent with this executive order.
This executive order supersedes Executive Order GA-16, but does not supersede
Executive Orders GA-b, GA-il, GA-l2, GA-13, GA-15, or GA-17. This executive
order shall remain in effect and in full force until 11:59 p.m. on May 15, 2020, unless it is
modified, amended, rescinded, or superseded by the governor.
GREG ABBOTT
Governor
ATTES BY:
FUTH R. HUGHS
Secretary of State
APR 2? 2020
Exhibit F
June 3, 2020
FILED N TH CFFCE OF THE
SECRETARY OF STATE
O’CLOCK
Pursuant to his powers as Governor of the State of Texas, Greg Abbott has issued the following:
Re :tfully submitted,
Attachment
POST OFFICE Box 12428 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 512-463-2000 (VoIcE) DIAL 7-1-1 FoR RELA’ SERVICES
Exhibit F
3xrcufir rbrr
BY THE
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF TEXAS
Executive Department
Austin, Texas
June 3, 2020
EXECUTIVE ORDER
GA26
WHEREAS, in each subsequent month effective through today, I have renewed the
disaster declaration tbr all Texas counties; and
WHEREAS, I have issued executive orders and suspensions of Texas laws in response to
COVID-19, aimed at protecting the health and safety of Texans and ensuring an
effective response to this disaster; and
WHEREAS, I issued Executive Order GA-Os on March 19, 2020, mandating certain
social-distancing restrictions for Texans in accordance with guidelines promulgated by
President Donald J. Trump and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC);
and
WHEREAS, I issued Executive Order GA-14 on March 31, 2020, expanding the social-
distancing restrictions for Texans based on guidance from health experts and the
President; and
WHEREAS, I subsequently issued Executive Orders GA-l6, GA-iS, GA-21, and GA-23
over the course of April and May 2020, aiming to achieve the least restrictive means of
combatting the threat to public health by continuing certain social-distancing restrictions,
while implementing a safe, strategic plan to Open Texas; and
WHEREAS, as normal business operations resume, everyone must act safely, and to that
end, this executive order and prior executive orders provide that all persons should
follow the health protocols recommended by DSHS, which whenever achieved wiLl
mean compliance with the minimum standards for safely reopening, but which should
not be used to fault those who act in good faith but can only substantially comply with
the standards in light of scarce resources and other extenuating COVID-l9
circumstances; and
WHEREAS, the “governor is responsible for meeting the dangers to the state and
...
people presented by disasters” under Section 418.011 of the Texas Government Code,
JUN 03 2020
Exhibit F
and the legislature has given the governor broad authority to fulfill that responsibility;
and
WHEREAS, failure to comply with any executive order issued during the COVID- 19
disaster is an offense punishable under Section 418.173 by a fine notto exceed $1,000,
and may be subject to regulatory enforcement;
NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas, by virtue of the power and
authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the State of Texas, and in
accordance with guidance from DSHS Commissioner Dr. Hellerstedt and other medical
advisors, the Governor’s Strike Force to Open Texas, the White House, and the CDC, do
hereby order the lollowtng on a statewide basis effective immediately:
JUN 03 2020
Exhibit F
People shall not visit nursing homes, state supported living centers, assisted living
facilities, or long-term care facilities unless as determined through guidance from
the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC). Nursing homes, state
supported living centers, assisted living facilities, and long-term care facilities
should follow infection control policies and practices set forth by HHSC, including
minimizing the movement of staff between facilities whenever possible.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the governor may by proclamation
add to the list of establishments or venues that people shall avoid visiting.
For the remainder of the 20 19-2020 school year, public schools may resume
operations for the summer as provided by, and under the minimum standard health
protocols found in, guidance issued by the Texas Education Agency (TEA). Private
schools and institutions of higher education are encouraged to establish similar
standards. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, schools may conduct
graduation ceremonies consistent with the minimum standard health protocols
found in guidance issued by TEA.
This executive order shall supersede any conflicting order issued by local officials
in response to the COVID-19 disaster, but only to the extent that such a local order
restricts services allowed by this executive order, allows gatherings prohibited by
this executive order, or expands the list or scope of services as set forth in this
executive order. Pursuant to Section 418.0 16(a) of the Texas Government Code, I
hereby suspend Sections 418.1015(b) and 418. 108 of the Texas Government Code,
Chapter 81, Subchapter E of the Texas Health and Safety Code, and any other
relevant statutes, to the extent necessary to ensure that local officials do not impose
restrictions in response to the COVID-19 disaster that are inconsistent with this
executive order, provided that local officials may enforce this executive order as
well as local restrictions that are consistent with this executive order.
All existing state executive orders relating to COVID- 19 are amended to eliminate
confinement in jail as an available penalty for violating the executive orders. To the
extent any order issued by local officials in response to the COVID-19 disaster
would allow confinement in jail as an available penalty for violating a COVID-l9-
related order, that order allowing confinement in jail is superseded, and 1 hereby
suspend all relevant laws to the extent necessary to ensure that local officials do not
confine people in jail for violating any executive order or local order issued in
response to the COVID-19 disaster.
This executive order supersedes Executive Order GA-23, but does not supersede
Executive Orders GA-b, GA-13, GA-17, GA-19, GA-20, GA-24, or GA-25. This
executive order shall remain in effect and in full force unless it is modified, amended,
rescinded, or superseded by the governor. This executive order may also be amended by
proclamation of the governor.
GREG ABBOTT
Governor
ATTEST
RIJTH R. HUGHS
Secretary of State
JUN 03 2020
Exhibit G
Pursuant to his powers as Governor of the State of Texas, Greg Abbott has issued the following:
Executive Order No. GA-2$ relating to the targeted response to the COVID-19
disaster as part of the reopening of Texas.
tly submitted,
S
‘lerk to the Governor
GSD/gsd
Attachment
POST OFFICE Box 12428 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 512-463-2000 (VOICE) DIAL 7-1-1 FOR RELAY SERVICES
Exhibit G
3xrcuthir rirr
BY THE
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF TEXAS
Executive Department
Austin, Texas
June 26, 2020
EXECUTIVE ORDER
GA28
WHEREAS, in each subsequent month effective through today, I have renewed the
disaster declaration for all Texas counties; and
WHEREAS, I have issued executive orders and suspensions of Texas laws in response to
COVIP- 19, aimed at protecting the health and safety of Texans and ensuring an
effective response to this disaster; and
WHEREAS, I issued Executive Order GA-08 on March 19, 2020, mandating certain
social-distancing restrictions for Texans in accordance with guidelines promulgated by
President Donald I. Trump and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC);
and
WHEREAS, I issued Executive Order GA-14 on March 31, 2020, expanding the social-
distancing restrictions for Texans based on guidance from health experts and the
President; and
WHEREAS, I subsequently issued Executive Orders GA-16, GA-18, GA-21, GA-23, and
GA-26 from April through early June 2020, aiming to achieve the least restrictive means
of combatting the threat to public health by continuing certain social-distancing
restrictions, while implementing a safe, strategic plan to Open Texas; and
JUN 2 6 2020
Exhibit G
least restrictive means for reducing the growing spread of COVID- 1 9 and the resulting
imminent threat to public health, and to avoid a need for more extreme measures; and
WHEREAS, everyone must act safely, and to that end, this executive order and prior
executive orders provide that all persons should follow the health protocols from DSHS,
which whenever achieved will mean compliance with the minimum standards for safely
reopening, but which should not be used to fault those who act in good faith but can only
substantially comply with the standards in light of scarce resources and other extenuating
COVID-19 circumstances; and
WHEREAS, the “governor is responsible for meeting the dangers to the state and
...
people presented by disasters” under Section 418.011 of the Texas Government Code,
and the legislature has given the governor broad authority to fulfill that responsibility;
and
WHEREAS, failure to comply with any executive order issued during the COVID-19
disaster is an offense punishable under Section 418. 173 by a fine not to exceed $1,000,
and may be subject to regulatory enforcement;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas, by virtue of the power and
authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the State of Texas, and in
accordance with guidance from DSHS Commissioner Dr. Hellerstedt and other medical
advisors, the Governor’s Strike Force to Open Texas, the White House, and the CDC, do
hereby order the following on a statewide basis effective at noon on June 26, 2020:
JUN 2 6 2020
Exhibit G
JUN 2 6 2020
Exhibit G
This executive order shall supersede any conflicting order issued by local officials
in response to the COVID-19 disaster, but only to the extent that such a local order
restricts services allowed by this executive order, allows gatherings prohibited by
this executive order, or expands the list or scope of services as set forth in this
executive order. Pursuant to Section 418.0 16(a) of the Texas Government Code, I
hereby suspend Sections 418.1015(b) and 418.10$ of the Texas Government Code,
Chapter 81, Subchapter E of the Texas Health and Safety Code, and any other
relevant statutes, to the extent necessary to ensure that local officials do not impose
restrictions in response to the COVID-19 disaster that are inconsistent with this
executive order, provided that local officials may enforce this executive order as
well as local restrictions that are consistent with this executive order.
All existing state executive orders relating to COVTD-19 are amended to eliminate
confinement in jail as an available penalty for violating the executive orders. To the
extent any order issued by local officials in response to the COVID-19 disaster
would allow confinement in jail as an available penalty for violating a COVD-l9-
related order, that order allowing confinement in jail is superseded, and I hereby
suspend all relevant laws to the extent necessary to ensure that local officials do not
confine people in jail for violating any executive order or local order issued in
response to the COVJD-19 disaster.
This executive order supersedes Executive Order GA-26, but does not supersede
Executive Orders GA-b, GA-13, GA-17, GA-19, GA-24, GA-25, or GA-27. This
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF TH
SECRETARY OF STATE
‘4Si O1CLOCK
JUN 2 6 2020
Exhibit G
executive order shall remain in effect and in full force unless it is modified, amended,
rescinded, or superseded by the governor. This executive order may also be amended by
proclamation of the governor.
GREG ABBOTT
Governor
ATTES BY:
UTH R. HUGHS
Secretary of State
JUN 26 2020
Exhibit H
You, the resident, do not give up any rights when you enter a nursing facility. The
facility must encourage and assist you to fully exercise your rights. Any violation of
these rights is against the law. It is against the law for any nursing facility
employee to threaten, coerce, intimidate or retaliate against you for exercising your
rights.
If anyone hurts you, threatens to hurt you, neglects your care, takes your property,
or violates your dignity, you have the right to file a complaint with the facility
administrator or with the Texas Health and Human Services Commission by calling
1-800-458-9858.
(1) all care necessary for you to have the highest possible level of health;
(5) be free from discrimination based on age, race, religion, sex, nationality,
or disability and to practice your own religious beliefs;
(7) complain about the facility and to organize or participate in any program
that presents residents' concerns to the administrator of the facility;
(9) retain the services of a physician of your choice, at your own expense or
through a health care plan, and to have a physician explain to you, in language you
understand, your complete medical condition, the recommended treatment, and the
expected results of the treatment, including reasonably expected effects, side
effects, and risks associated with psychoactive medications;
person;
(13) access money and property you have deposited with the facility and to
an accounting of your money and property that are deposited with the facility and
of all financial transactions made with or on behalf of you;
(14) keep and use personal property, secure from theft or loss;
(15) not be relocated within the facility, except in accordance with nursing
facility regulations;
(20) discharge yourself from the facility unless a court finds that you lack this
capacity;
(21) not be discharged from the facility, except as provided in the nursing
facility regulations;
(22) be free from any physical or chemical restraints imposed for the
purposes of discipline or convenience and not required to treat your medical
symptoms;
(24) place an electronic monitoring device in your room that is owned and
operated by you or provided by your guardian or legal representative.
Your rights may be restricted only to the extent necessary to protect you or
another person from danger or harm or to protect a right of another resident,
particularly those relating to privacy and confidentiality.
9/2/2020 Emergency Rules Title 40
Exhibit I
TITLE 40. SOCIAL SERVICES AND ASSISTANCE
40 TAC §19.2801
The Executive Commissioner of the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) adopts on an emergency
basis in Title 40, Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 19, Nursing Facility Requirements for Licensure and
Medicaid Certification, new Subchapter CC, COVID-19 Emergency Rule, §19.2801, concerning an emergency
rule in response to COVID-19 in order to reduce the risk of transmission of COVID-19. As authorized by
Government Code §2001.034 the Commission may adopt an emergency rule without prior notice or hearing
upon finding that an imminent peril to the public health, safety, or welfare requires adoption on fewer than 30
days' notice. Emergency rules adopted under Government Code §2001.034 may be effective for not longer than
120 days and may be renewed for not longer than 60 days.
The purpose of the emergency rulemaking is to support the Governor's March 13, 2020, proclamation certifying
that the COVID-19 virus poses an imminent threat of disaster in the state and declaring a state of disaster for all
counties in Texas. In this proclamation, the Governor authorized the use of all available resources of state
government and of political subdivisions that are reasonably necessary to cope with this disaster and directed
that government entities and businesses would continue providing essential services. The Commission
accordingly finds that an imminent peril to the public health, safety, and welfare of the state requires immediate
adoption of this Emergency Rule for Facility Response to COVID-19.
To protect nursing facility residents and the public health, safety, and welfare of the state during the COVID-19
pandemic, HHSC is adopting an emergency rule to restrict entry into a nursing facility and require screening of
certain persons authorized to enter a nursing facility.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The emergency rulemaking is adopted under Government Code §2001.034 and §531.0055 and Health and Safety
Code §242.001 and §242.037. Government Code §2001.034 authorizes the adoption of emergency rules without
prior notice and hearing, if an agency finds that an imminent peril to the public health, safety, or welfare requires
adoption of a rule on fewer than 30 days' notice. Government Code §531.0055 authorizes the Executive
Commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules and policies necessary for the operation and provision of health and
human services by the health and human services system. Health and Safety Code §242.037 authorizes the
Executive Commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules to implement Chapter 242 of the Health and Safety Code
including making and enforcing minimum standards for quality of care and quality of life of nursing facility
residents. Health and Safety Code §242.001 provides that the goal of Chapter 242 is to ensure that nursing
facilities deliver the highest possible quality of care.
(a) Based on state law and federal guidance, HHSC finds COVID-19 to be a health and safety risk and requires a
nursing facility to take the following measures. The screening required by this section does not apply to
emergency services personnel entering the facility in an emergency situation.
(1) Providers of essential services include, but are not limited to, contract doctors, contract nurses, hospice
Exhibit I
workers, and individuals operating under the authority of a local intellectual and developmental disability
authority (LIDDA) or a local mental health authority (LMHA) whose services are necessary to ensure resident
health and safety.
(2) Persons with legal authority to enter include, but are not limited to, law enforcement officers, representatives
of the long-term care ombudsman's office, and government personnel performing their official duties.
(3) Persons providing critical assistance include providers of essential services, persons with legal authority to
enter, and family members or friends of residents at the end of life.
(c) A nursing facility must take the temperature of every person upon arrival and must not allow a person with a
fever to enter or remain in the nursing facility, except as a resident.
(d) A nursing facility must prohibit visitors, except as provided in subsection (e) of this section.
(e) A nursing facility may allow entry of persons providing critical assistance, unless the nursing facility
believes the person may impede the health and safety of residents or the person meets one or more of the
following screening criteria:
(1) Fever or signs or symptoms of a respiratory infection, such as cough, shortness of breath, or sore throat;
(2) Contact in the last 14 days with someone who has a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, someone who is
under investigation for COVID-19, or someone who is ill with a respiratory illness; or
(3) International travel within the last 14 days to countries with ongoing community transmission. For updated
information on affected countries visit: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/travelers/map-and-travel-
notices.html.
(f) A nursing facility must not prohibit government personnel performing their official duty from entering the
nursing facility, unless the individual meets the above screening criteria.
(g) If this emergency rule is more restrictive than any minimum standard relating to a nursing facility, this
emergency rule will prevail so long as this emergency rule is in effect.
(h) If an executive order or other direction is issued by the Governor of Texas, the President of the United States,
or another applicable authority, that is more restrictive than this emergency rule or any minimum standard
relating to a nursing facility, the nursing facility must comply with the executive order or other direction.
The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the emergency adoption and found it to be within the state
agency's legal authority to adopt.
TRD-202001348
Karen Ray
Chief Counsel
40 TAC §98.65
The Executive Commissioner of the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) adopts on an emergency
basis in Title 40, Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 98 Day Activity and Health Services Requirements, new
§98.65, concerning an emergency rule in response to COVID-19 in order to reduce the risk of transmission of
COVID-19. As authorized by Government Code §2001.034, the Commission may adopt an emergency rule
without prior notice or hearing upon finding that an imminent peril to the public health, safety, or welfare
requires adoption on fewer than 30 days' notice. Emergency rules adopted under Government Code §2001.034,
may be effective for not longer than 120 days and may be renewed for not longer than 60 days.
The purpose of the emergency rulemaking is to support the Governor's March 13, 2020, proclamation certifying
that the COVID-19 virus poses an imminent threat of disaster in the state and declaring a state of disaster for all
counties in Texas. In this proclamation, the Governor authorized the use of all available resources of state
government and of political subdivisions that are reasonably necessary to cope with this disaster and directed
that government entities and businesses would continue providing essential services. The Commission
accordingly finds that an imminent peril to the public health, safety, and welfare of the state requires immediate
adoption of this Emergency Rule for Day Activity and Health Services Response to COVID-19.
To protect day activity and health services clients and the public health, safety, and welfare of the state during
the COVID-19 pandemic, HHSC is adopting an emergency rule to restrict entry into a day and health services
facility and require screening of certain persons authorized to enter a day and health services facility.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The emergency rulemaking is adopted under Government Code §2001.034 and §531.0055 and Human
Resources Code §103.004 and §103.005. Government Code §2001.034 authorizes the adoption of emergency
rules without prior notice and hearing, if an agency finds that an imminent peril to the public health, safety, or
welfare requires adoption of a rule on fewer than 30 days' notice. Government Code §531.0055 authorizes the
Executive Commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules and policies necessary for the operation and provision of
health and human services by the health and human services system. Human Resources Code §103.004,
authorizes the Executive Commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules implementing Chapter 103 of the Human
Resources Code, concerning Day Activity and Health Services Facilities. Human Resources Code §103.005
authorizes the Executive Commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules governing the standards for safety and
sanitation of a licensed day activity and health services facility.
§98.65.Emergency Rule for Day Activity and Health Services Response to COVID-19.
(a) Based on state law and federal guidance, HHSC finds COVID-19 to be a health and safety risk and requires a
day activity and health services facility to take the following measures. The screening required by this section
does not apply to emergency services personnel entering the facility in an emergency situation.
(1) Providers of essential services include, but are not limited to, contract doctors, contract nurses, and home
health workers whose services are necessary to ensure client health and safety.
(3) Persons providing critical assistance include providers of essential services and persons with legal authority
to enter.
(c) A day activity and health services facility must take the temperature of every person upon arrival and must
not allow a person with a fever to enter or remain in the facility.
(d) A day activity and health services facility must prohibit visitors, except as provided in subsection (e) of this
section.
(e) A day activity and health services facility may allow entry of persons providing critical assistance, unless the
person meets one or more of the following screening criteria:
(1) Fever or signs or symptoms of a respiratory infection, such as cough, shortness of breath, or sore throat;
(2) Contact in the last 14 days with someone who has a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, someone who is
under investigation for COVID-19, or someone who is ill with a respiratory illness; or
(3) International travel within the last 14 days to countries with ongoing community transmission. For updated
information on affected countries visit: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/travelers/map-and-travel-
notices.html.
(f) A facility must not prohibit government personnel performing their official duty from entering the facility,
unless the individual meets the above screening criteria.
(g) If this emergency rule is more restrictive than any minimum standard relating to a day activity and health
services facility, this emergency rule will prevail so long as this emergency rule is in effect.
(h) If an executive order or other direction is issued by the Governor of Texas, the President of the United States,
or another applicable authority, that is more restrictive than this emergency rule or any minimum standard
relating to a day activity and health services facility, the day activity and health services facility must comply
with the executive order or other direction.
The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the emergency adoption and found it to be within the state
agency's legal authority to adopt.
TRD-202001347
Karen Ray
Chief Counsel
40 TAC §19.2802
The Executive Commissioner of the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) adopts on an emergency
basis in Title 40, Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 19, Nursing Facility Requirements for Licensure and
Medicaid Certification, new §19.2802, concerning an emergency rule in response to COVID-19 and requiring
nursing facility actions to mitigate and contain COVID-19. As authorized by Texas Government Code
§2001.034, the Commission may adopt an emergency rule without prior notice or hearing if it finds that an
imminent peril to the public health, safety, or welfare requires adoption on fewer than 30 days' notice.
Emergency rules adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.034 may be effective for not longer than 120
days and may be renewed for not longer than 60 days.
The purpose of the emergency rulemaking is to support the Governor's March 13, 2020 proclamation certifying
that the COVID-19 virus poses an imminent threat of disaster in the state and declaring a state of disaster for all
counties in Texas. In this proclamation, the governor authorized the use of all available resources of state
government and of political subdivisions that are reasonably necessary to cope with this disaster and directed
that government entities and businesses would continue providing essential services. The Commission
accordingly finds that an imminent peril to the public health, safety, and welfare of the state requires immediate
adoption of this Nursing Facility COVID-19 Response.
To protect nursing facility residents and the public health, safety, and welfare of the state during the COVID-19
pandemic, HHSC is adopting an emergency rule to require nursing facility actions to mitigate and contain
COVID-19. The purpose of the new rule is to describe these requirements.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The emergency rule is adopted under Texas Government Code §§2001.034 and 531.0055, and Texas Health and
Safety Code §242.001 and §242.037. Texas Government Code §2001.034 authorizes the adoption of emergency
rules without prior notice and hearing, if an agency finds that an imminent peril to the public health, safety, or
welfare requires adoption of a rule on fewer than 30 days' notice. Texas Government Code §531.0055,
authorizes the Executive Commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules governing the operation and provision of health
and human services byHHSC. Texas Health and Safety Code §242.037 requires the Executive Commissioner of
HHSC to make and enforce rules prescribing minimum standards quality of care and quality of life for nursing
facility residents. Texas Health and Safety Code §242.001 states the goal of Chapter 242 is to ensure that nursing
facilities in Texas deliver the highest possible quality of care and establish the minimum acceptable levels of
care for individuals who are living in a nursing facility.
The new rule implements Texas Government Code §531.0055 and §531.021 and Texas Human Resources Code
§32.021.
(a) The following words and terms, when used in this subchapter, have the following meanings.
(2) COVID-19 status--The status of a person based on COVID-19 test results, symptoms, or other factors that
consider the person's potential for having the virus.
(3) COVID-19 positive--A person who has tested positive for COVID-19 and does not yet meet CDC guidance
for the discontinuation of transmission-based precautions.
(4) COVID-19 negative--A person who has tested negative for COVID-19, is not exhibiting symptoms of
COVID-19, and has had no known exposure to the virus since the negative test.
(5) Isolation--The separation of people who are COVID-19 positive from those who are COVID-19 negative and
those whose COVID-19 status is unknown.
(6) PPE--Personal protective equipment. Specialized clothing or equipment worn by nursing facility staff for
protection against transmission of infectious diseases such as COVID-19, including masks, goggles, face shields,
gloves, and disposable gowns.
(7) Quarantine--The separation of a person with unknown COVID-19 status from those who are COVID-19
positive and those who are COVID-19 negative.
(8) Unknown COVID-19 status--A person who is a new admission, readmission, has spent one or more nights
away from the facility, has had known exposure or close contact with a person who is COVID-19 positive, or
who is exhibiting symptoms of COVID-19 while awaiting test results.
(b) A nursing facility must have a COVID-19 response plan that includes:
(1) Cohorting plans that include designated space for COVID-19 negative residents, COVID-19 positive
residents, and residents with unknown COVID-19 status.
(2) Spaces for staff to don and doff PPE that minimize the movement of staff through other areas of the facility.
(4) Plans for obtaining and maintaining a two-week supply of PPE, including surgical facemasks, N95
facemasks, gowns, gloves, and goggles or face shields.
(5) Resident recovery plans for continuing care after a resident recovers from COVID-19.
(c) A nursing facility must screen all residents, staff, and people who come to the facility for the following
criteria:
(1) fever defined as a temperature of 100.4 Fahrenheit and above, or signs or symptoms of a respiratory
infection, such as cough, shortness of breath, or sore throat;
(2) signs or symptoms of COVID-19, including chills, cough, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, fatigue,
muscle or body aches, headache, new loss of taste or smell, sore throat, congestion or runny nose, nausea or
vomiting, or diarrhea;
(3) additional signs and symptoms as outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in
Symptoms of Coronavirus at cdc.gov;
(4) contact in the last 14 days, unless to provide critical assistance, with someone who has a confirmed diagnosis
of COVID-19, is under investigation for COVID-19, or is ill with a respiratory illness; and
(5) international travel, unless to provide critical assistance, within the last 14 days.
Exhibit I
(d) A nursing facility must screen each resident as described below. Resident screenings must be documented in
the resident's chart. Residents who meet any of the criteria must be cohorted appropriately.
(1) for the criteria in subsection (c)(1)-(5) upon admission or readmission to the facility; and
(2) for the criteria in subsection (c)(1)-(3) at least three times a day, occurring at least once each shift.
(e) A nursing facility must screen each employee or contractor for the criteria in subsection (c)(1)-(5) before
entering the facility at the start of their shift. Staff screenings must be documented in a log kept at the facility
entrance and must include the name of each person screened, the date and time of the evaluation, and the results
of the evaluation. Staff who meet any of the criteria must not be permitted to enter the facility and must be sent
home.
(f) A nursing facility must cohort residents based on the residents' COVID-19 status.
(g) A resident with unknown COVID-19 status must be quarantined and monitored for fever and symptoms of
COVID-19, per CDC guidance.
(h) A COVID-19 positive resident must be isolated until the resident meets CDC guidelines for the
discontinuation of transmission-based precautions.
(1) the facility to designate staff to work with each cohort and not change that designation from one day to
another, unless required to maintain adequate staffing for a cohort;
(2) staff to wear appropriate PPE, based on the cohort with which they work;
(3) staff to report to the facility via phone prior to reporting for work if they have known exposure or symptoms;
and
(j) A nursing facility must develop and implement a policy regarding staff working with other long-term care
(LTC) providers that:
(1) limits the sharing of staff with other LTC providers and facilities, unless required in order to maintain
adequate staffing at a facility.
(2) maintains a list of staff who work for other LTC providers or facilities that includes the names and addresses
of the other employers.
(3) requires all staff to report to the facility immediately if there are COVID-19 positive cases at the staff's other
place of employment.
(4) requires the facility to notify the staff's other place of employment if the staff member is diagnosed with
COVID-19; and
(5) requires staff to report to the facility which cohort they are assigned to at the staff's other place of
employment. The NF must maintain the same cohort designation for that employee, unless required in order to
maintain adequate staffing for a cohort.
(k) All nursing facility staff must wear facemasks while in the facility. Staff who are caring for COVID-19
positive residents and those caring for residents with unknown COVID-19 status must wear an N95 mask, gown,
https://www.sos.texas.gov/texreg/archive/August212020/Emergency Rules/40.SOCIAL SERVICES AND ASSISTANCE .html#15 3/10
9/2/2020 Emergency Rules Title 40
gloves, and goggles or a face shield. All facemasks and N95 masks must be in good functional condition, as
Exhibit I
described in the COVID-19 Response for Nursing Facilities at hhs.texas.gov, and worn appropriately,
completely covering the nose and mouth, at all times.
(1) A nursing facility must comply with CDC guidance on the optimization of PPE when supply limitations
require PPE to be reused.
(2) A nursing facility must document all efforts made to obtain PPE, including the organization contacted and
the date of each attempt.
(l) A nursing facility must report COVID-19 activity as required by §19.1601(d)(2) and 42 Code of Federal
Regulations §483.80(g)(1)-(2). COVID-19 activity must be reported to HHSC Complaint and Incident Intake, as
described below.
(1) Report the first confirmed case of COVID-19 in staff or residents, and the first confirmed case of COVID-19
after a facility has been without new cases for 14 days or more, to HHSC Complaint and Incident Intake through
TULIP or by calling 1-800-458-9858 within 24 hours of the confirmed positive result.
(2) Submit a Form 3613-A, Provider Investigation Report, to HHSC Complaint and Incident Intake through
TULIP or by calling 1-800-458-9858 within five days from the day a confirmed case is reported to CII.
(m) If an executive order or other direction is issued by the Governor of Texas, the President of the United
States, or another applicable authority, that is more restrictive than this rule or any minimum standard relating to
a nursing facility, the nursing facility must comply with the executive order or other direction.
The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the emergency adoption and found it to be within the state
agency's legal authority to adopt.
TRD-202003191
Karen Ray
Chief Counsel
40 TAC §19.2803
The Executive Commissioner of the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) adopts on an emergency
basis in Title 40, Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 19, Nursing Facility Requirements for Licensure and
Medicaid Certification, new §19.2803, concerning an emergency rule in response to COVID-19 describing
requirements for limited outdoor visitation in a facility during Phase 1. As authorized by Texas Government
Code §2001.034, the Commission may adopt an emergency rule without prior notice or hearing if it finds that an
imminent peril to the public health, safety, or welfare requires adoption on fewer than 30 days' notice.
Emergency rules adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.034 may be effective for not longer than 120
days and may be renewed for not longer than 60 days.
The purpose of the emergency rulemaking is to support the Governor's March 13, 2020 proclamation certifying
that the COVID-19 virus poses an imminent threat of disaster in the state and declaring a state of disaster for all
counties in Texas. In this proclamation, the Governor authorized the use of all available resources of state
government and of political subdivisions that are reasonably necessary to cope with this disaster and directed
that government entities and businesses would continue providing essential services. The Commission
accordingly finds that an imminent peril to the public health, safety, and welfare of the state requires immediate
adoption of this Nursing Facility COVID-19 Response - Phase 1 Visitation.
To protect nursing facility residents and the public health, safety, and welfare of the state during the COVID-19
pandemic, HHSC is adopting an emergency rule to allow limited outdoor visitation in a nursing facility during
phase 1. The purpose of the new rule is to describe the requirements related to such visits.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The emergency rulemaking is adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.034 and §531.0055, and Texas
Health and Safety Code §242.001 and §242.037. Texas Government Code §2001.034 authorizes the adoption of
emergency rules without prior notice and hearing, if an agency finds that an imminent peril to the public health,
safety, or welfare requires adoption of a rule on fewer than 30 days' notice. Texas Government Code §531.0055,
authorizes the Executive Commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules governing the operation and provision of health
and human services by the health and human services system. Texas Health and Safety Code §242.037 requires
the Executive Commissioner of HHSC to make and enforce rules prescribing minimum standards quality of care
and quality of life for nursing facility residents. Texas Health and Safety Code §242.001 states the goal of
Chapter 242 is to ensure that nursing facilities in Texas deliver the highest possible quality of care and establish
the minimum acceptable levels of care for individuals who are living in a nursing facility.
The new rule implements Texas Government Code §531.0055 and §531.021, Texas Health and Safety Code
Chapter 242, and Texas Human Resources Code §32.021.
(a) The following words and terms, when used in this section, have the following meanings.
(1) Outdoor visit--A personal visit between a resident and one or more personal visitors that occurs in-person in
a ddicated outdoor space.
(2) Window visit--A personal visit between a visitor and a resident during which the resident and personal
visitor are separated by an open window.
(3) Vehicle parade--A personal visit between a resident and one or more personal visitors, during which the
resident remains outdoors on the nursing facility campus, and a visitor drives past in a vehicle.
(4) Compassionate care visit--A personal visit between one permanently designated visitor and a resident
experiencing a failure to thrive.
(5) Failure to thrive--A state of decline in a resident's physical or mental health, diagnosed by a physician and
documented in the resident records, which may be caused by chronic concurrent disease and functional
impairment. Signs of a failure to thrive include weight loss, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, and inactivity.
Prevalent and predictive conditions that might lead to a failure to thrive include impaired physical function,
malnutrition, depression, and cognitive impairment.
(6) Outbreak--One or more laboratory confirmed cases of COVID-19 identified in either a resident or
paid/unpaid staff.
(b) A nursing facility with a Phase 1 facility designation approved by the Texas Health and Human Services
Exhibit I
Commission (HHSC) may allow limited personal visitation as permitted by this section.
(c) To request a Phase 1 facility designation, a nursing facility submits a completed LTCR form 2192, Phase 1
COVID-19 Status Attestation Form, to the Regional Director in the LTCR Region where the facility is located.
(1) there have been no confirmed COVID-19 cases in staff for at least 14 consecutive days;
(4) if a nursing facility has had previous cases of COVID-19 in staff or residents, HHSC LTCR has conducted a
verification survey and confirmed the following:
(B) the nursing facility has adequate staffing to continue care for all residents and supervise visits permitted by
this section; and
(C) the nursing facility is in compliance with infection control requirements and emergency rules related to
COVID-19.
(e) A nursing facility with a Phase 1 facility designation may allow outdoor visits, window visits, vehicle
parades, and compassionate care visits involving residents and personal visitors. The following requirements
apply to all visitation allowed under this section:
(2) Visitation appointments must be scheduled to allow time for cleaning and sanitation of the visitation area
between visits.
(4) Visits are permitted where adequate space is available that meets criteria and when adequate staff are
available to monitor visits.
(5) All visitors must be screened outside of the nursing facility prior to being allowed to visit, except visitors
participating in a vehicle parade. Visitors who meet any of the following screening criteria must leave the
nursing facility campus and reschedule the visit:
(A) fever defined as a temperature of 100.4 Fahrenheit and above, or signs or symptoms of a respiratory
infection, such as cough, shortness of breath, or sore throat;
(B) signs or symptoms of COVID-19, including chills, cough, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, fatigue,
muscle or body aches, headache, new loss of taste or smell, sore throat, congestion or runny nose, nausea or
vomiting, or diarrhea;
(C) additional signs and symptoms as outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in
Symptoms of Coronavirus at cdc.gov;
(D) contact in the last 14 days with someone who has a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, is under
investigation for COVID-19, or is ill with a respiratory illness; or
(6) The resident must wear a facemask or face covering (if tolerated) throughout the visit.
(7) The nursing facility must ensure social distancing of at least six feet is maintained between visitors and
residents at all times and limit the number of visitors and residents in the visitation area as needed.
(8) The nursing facility can limit the number of visitors per resident per week, and the length of time per visit, to
ensure equal access by all residents to visitors.
(9) Cleaning and disinfecting of the visitation area, furniture, and all other items must be performed, per CDC
guidance, before and after each visit.
(10) The nursing facility must ensure a comfortable and safe outdoor visiting area (i.e., considering outside air
temperatures and ventilation).
(11) The nursing facility must designate an outdoor area for visitation that is separated from residents and limits
the ability of the visitor to interact with residents.
(f) The following requirements apply to outdoor visits, window visits, and compassionate care visits:
(1) A nursing facility must provide hand washing stations, or hand sanitizer, to the visitor and resident before
and after visits.
(2) The visitor and the resident must practice hand hygiene before and after the visit.
(3) The visitor must wear a facemask or face covering over both the mouth and nose throughout the visit.
(2) The nursing facility must ensure social distancing of at least six feet is maintained between residents
throughout the parade.
(3) The nursing facility must ensure residents are not closer than 10 feet to the vehicles for safety reasons.
(4) The resident must wear a facemask or face covering (if tolerated) throughout the visit.
(2) The visit is limited to one permanently designated personal visitor per resident at any time.
(3) If the resident experiencing failure to thrive cannot tolerate an outdoor visit, the visit can take place in the
resident's room or other area of the facility separated from other residents. The nursing facility must limit the
movement of the visitor through the facility to ensure interaction with other residents is minimized.
(4) The visit must be supervised by facility staff for the duration of the visit.
(5) The resident must wear a facemask or face covering (if tolerated) throughout the visit.
(6) The nursing facility must ensure social distancing of at least six feet is maintained between visitors and
residents at all times.
(7) The visitor must wear a facemask or face covering over both the mouth and nose throughout the visit.
https://www.sos.texas.gov/texreg/archive/August212020/Emergency Rules/40.SOCIAL SERVICES AND ASSISTANCE .html#15 7/10
9/2/2020 Emergency Rules Title 40
(i) If, at any time after designation as a Phase 1 facility by HHSC, the facility experiences an outbreak of
Exhibit I
COVID-19, the facility must notify the Regional Director in the LTCR Region where the facility is located that
the facility no longer meets Phase 1 criteria, and all Phase 1 visitation must be cancelled until the facility meets
the criteria described in subsection (d) of this section.
The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the emergency adoption and found it to be within the state
agency's legal authority to adopt.
TRD-202003201
Karen Ray
Chief Counsel
40 TAC §815.1
The Texas Workforce Commission is renewing the effectiveness of emergency amended §815.1 for a 60-day
period. The text of the emergency rule was originally published in the May 8, 2020, issue of the Texas Register
(45 TexReg 2953).
TRD-202003195
Dawn Cronin
The Texas Workforce Commission is renewing the effectiveness of emergency amended §815.12 and §815.29
Exhibit I
for a 60-day period. The text of the emergency rule was originally published in the April 24, 2020, issue of the
Texas Register (45 TexReg 2612).
TRD-202003194
Dawn Cronin
The Texas Workforce Commission is renewing the effectiveness of emergency amended §§815.170 - 815.172
and 815.174 for a 60-day period. The text of the emergency rule was originally published in the May 8, 2020,
issue of the Texas Register (45 TexReg 2951).
TRD-202003196
Dawn Cronin
40 TAC §815.173
The Texas Workforce Commission is renewing the effectiveness of emergency repeal §815.173 for a 60-day
period. The text of the emergency rule was originally published in the May 8, 2020, issue of the Texas Register
(45 TexReg 2951).
TRD-202003197
Dawn Cronin
COVID-19 RESPONSE
FOR NURSING
FACILITIES
Abstract
This document provides guidance to Nursing
Facilities on Response Actions in the event of
a COVID-19 exposure.
[Version 3.3]
[7/29/20]
Exhibit J
Contents
Contents ................................................................................................. 2
1. Purpose.............................................................................................. 8
2. Goals .................................................................................................. 9
3. Summary ......................................................................................... 10
Visitors ............................................................................................14
7. S.P.I.C.E. .......................................................................................... 19
8. HHSC Long-term Care Regulat[ion] Activities with NFs that have Positive
COVID-19 Cases ............................................................................... 20
Purpose ...........................................................................................34
Background ......................................................................................34
ASPR TRACIE....................................................................................53
CDC ................................................................................................53
CMS ................................................................................................54
DSHS ..............................................................................................54
EPA .................................................................................................54
HHS ................................................................................................55
HHSC ..............................................................................................55
Exhibit J
NIOSH .............................................................................................55
OOG................................................................................................55
OSHA ..............................................................................................55
Cecilia Cavuto
Nursing Facility, Policy Manager
Contact for Policy and Rule
Cecilia.Cavuto@hhsc.state.tx.us
PolicyRulesTraining@hhsc.state.tx.us
Phone: 512-650-6401
Michael Gayle, PT
Director of the Quality Monitoring Program
Nursing Facility Technical Assistance and Infection Control Best Practice
Michael.Gayle01@hhsc.state.tx.us
Phone: 512-318-6902
Exhibit J
TABLE OF CHANGES
Document
Version Date Change Comments
3.0 05.21.2020 Additions to pages 13, 16, 17, 21, 26, 32,
33, 34, 37, 41, 42, 46, 47, 49, 52, 54, 56,
57, 60, 63, 67, 68, 71 and 72
Document
Version Date Change Comments
Exhibit J
1. Purpose
The purpose of this document is to provide NFs with response guidance in the event
of a positive COVID-19 case associated with the facility.
Exhibit J
2. Goals
3. Summary
Residents of NFs are more susceptible to COVID-19 infection and the detrimental impact
of the virus than the general population. In addition to the susceptibility of residents,
a LTC environment presents challenges to infection control and the ability to contain
an outbreak, resulting in potentially rapid spread among a highly vulnerable
population.
This document provides NFs immediate actions to consider and actions for extended
periods after a facility is made aware of potential infection of a resident, provider or
visitor.
Exhibit J
A hospital-based SNF is located in a hospital and provides skilled nursing care and
rehabilitation services for people who have been discharged from that hospital but
who are unable to return home right away. They do not accept general admissions.
Exhibit J
NFs can promote social distancing in a variety of ways. For example, dining and
activities can take place in resident rooms and when able, residents can participate in
medication passes while remaining in their doorways. Current CMS and state
guidance for NFs state that communal activities, including dining, should be canceled,
and no more than 10 people, maintaining at least 6 feet of separation, can be in a
room at any time. Meals can be served in the dining room for residents who require
assistance with feeding if social distancing is practiced.
Facility Demographics
NFs are located in metropolitan, urban, and rural locales. Each locale has specific
characteristics that affect workforce availability, health care system support, and
interactions with public health, emergency care, and jurisdictional administration.
Texas currently has 1,220 NFs and nine hospital-based SNF units.
NFs in more densely populated locations are likely to experience higher risk for
exposure among staff and visitors. As a result, these facilities have a higher risk of
infection and face more challenges controlling spread when infection occurs. They are
also more likely to face staffing shortages because of competitive job markets.
Exhibit J
NFs in more rural locations have less health care system support, might not have
local health authorities, and have smaller staffing pools, making it harder to cover
shortages that result from probable exposure. Facilities in rural areas might also be
more challenged to find equipment, such as personal protective equipment (PPE) and
ventilators, necessary to care for COVID-19 positive residents.
Facility Considerations
Facilities might have small, medium, or large bed capacity within buildings differing in
age, size, available space, and equipment. Available services also differ by facility,
affecting the level of available care; ventilator support might not be present, and the
types of health care providers on site will also vary.
There are NFs with limited or no isolation rooms available. Statewide, approximately
30 NFs are equipped to care for residents on ventilators. Bed capacity (along with
staff and PPE availability) also affects the number of residents for which each facility
can provide care. COVID-19 positive residents will increase the staff and resources
required to provide care, further limiting the number of residents that a facility can
serve.
Resident Demographics
All NF residents must meet medical necessity to reside in a NF. While all have medical
needs, each resident is unique and might require rehabilitation services, minimal
supportive care, or significant medical care. Resident conditions will vary physically
and mentally, affecting mobility and intellectual capacity.
All NF residents require care from medical professionals who are in increasingly short
supply as the pandemic continues. Also, the subpopulation of residents with dementia
and Alzheimer’s disease are often unable to express when they experience symptoms
and could unknowingly (and without staff knowing) spread the virus if infected. This
population is also less likely to understand why social distancing and quarantine are
necessary and can present challenging behaviors when staff attempt to enforce such
restrictions.
NF Staffing Considerations
The NF workforce is made up of medical professionals and direct care staff including:
registered nurses (RNs), licensed vocational nurses (LVNs), certified nurse aides
(CNAs), medication aides, respiratory therapists, facility support staff, and other
skilled and non-skilled workers. Rules require NFs to provide nursing services at a
ratio of not less than one licensed nurse for every 20 residents, or a minimum of 0.4
licensed-care hours per resident per day.
Many NF residents’ daily activities, such as dining, bathing, grooming and ambulating,
require partial or total assistance from facility staff. Caring for someone with COVID-
19 requires additional time and resources, including PPE, to maintain infection control
and protect other residents and staff. As staff are exposed, become symptomatic or
test positive for COVID-19, the available workforce will decline making it even more
challenging for NFs to provide care.
Visitors
During routine NF operations, visitors including family members, volunteers,
consultants, external providers, and contractors regularly enter facilities. Many
perform services essential for facility function, or in the case of service providers such
as hospice and dialysis staff, they provide services critical to resident care. It is
important to note current CMS and state guidance to NFs requires they limit visitors to
only those who are providing critical assistance and only if these essential visitors are
properly screened.
Despite efforts to screen visitors prior to allowing them to enter the facility, every
person allowed inside the building increases the risk of infection. Some people will
present as asymptomatic during screening but will have COVID-19 and unknowingly
spread the virus. Some visitors will not follow standard precautions such as proper
hand-washing, use of hand sanitizer, use of PPE, isolation protocols, and limiting the
number of areas in the building that they access – all of which increases the risk of
infection for residents and staff.
Exhibit J
Note: Temporary walls or barriers or plastic sheeting must not impede or obstruct the
means of egress, fire safety components or fire safety systems (e.g., corridors, exit
doors, smoke barrier doors, fire alarm pulls, fire sprinklers, smoke detectors, fire
alarm panels, or fire extinguishers).
Note: New admissions, readmissions, and residents who have spent one or more
nights away from the facility are all considered residents with unknown COVID-19
status. Residents who leave the facility for medically necessary appointments and
return the same day are not considered to have unknown COVID-19 status. These
residents’ COVID-19 status is the same as when they left the facility for their
appointment and can return to their usual room.
Exhibit J
7. S.P.I.C.E.
For a report of a positive COVID-19 test (resident or staff) in a NF, HHSC will take the
following steps:
• Provide separate spaces to don (put on) and doff (take off) PPE when
possible
• When a single area is provided for donning and doffing PPE, these
principals should be followed:
o Provide for hand hygiene and adequate disposal of used PPE in the
donning and doffing area
o Only donning or doffing should occur at any given time – do not perform
these activities at the same time
o Only two people should be in the area at any time - use the buddy
system to assure that donning and doffing is done correctly
• Screen residents for signs and symptoms at least once each shift
• Screen staff for signs and symptoms at least at the beginning of their shift
• Enact HAI procedures
• Clean and disinfect facility
o High-touch surfaces include items like doorknobs, light switches,
handrails, countertops - clean and disinfect frequently
o Workstations include items like computers, chairs, keypads, common-
use items - clean and disinfect frequently
o Equipment includes items like blood pressure cuffs, hoyer lifts and other
shared equipment used for resident care - clean and disinfect after each
use
o Use EPA-registered disinfectants that have qualified under EPA’s
emerging viral pathogens program for use against SARS-CoV-2
• Confirm case definitions
• Identify HCW outside activities
• Activate resident transport protocols (for transporting residents out)
• Establish contact with receiving agencies (hospitals, other facilities)
• Identify lead at facility and determine stakeholders involved external to
facility
• Engage with community partners (public health, health care, organizational
leadership, local/state administrators)
• Review/establish testing plan
• Activate all communication plans
• Determine need for facility restrictions/lock-down
• Supply resource evaluations
• Maintain resident care
• Upon the first positive test result of a NF staff member or resident, work
with local health authorities, DSHS, and HHSC to coordinate testing of all
NF staff and residents.
• Report a[ll] confirmed COVID-19 cases to the local health department or
DSHS. [In instances where there is no local health authority, report to
DSHS directly.]
Exhibit J
• Report the first confirmed case of COVID-19 in staff or residents, and the
first confirmed case of COVID-19 after a facility has been without cases for
14 days or more, to HHSC Complaint and Incident Intake through TULIP or
by calling 1-800-458-9858 within 24 hours of the positive test.
• Submit a Form 3613-A provider investigation report to HHSC Complaint
and Incident Intake through TULIP or by calling 1-800-458-9858 within 5
days from the day a confirmed case is reported.]
• Report [weekly] all confirmed [and probable] COVID-19 cases and persons
under investigation for COVID-19 among residents and staff to the CDC via
NHSN weekly. See CMS QSO 20-29. [(Note: This includes residents
previously treated for COVID-19. Also report the following to NHSN:
o Total deaths, including COVID-19 deaths among residents and staff,
o Personal protective equipment and hand hygiene supplies in the facility,
o Ventilator capacity and supplies in the facility,
o Resident beds and census,
o Access to COVID-19 testing while the resident is in the facility, and
o Staffing shortages.)]
• Keep all residents’ and their representatives up to date on the conditions
inside the facility, such as when new cases of COVID-19 occur. See CMS
QSO 20-29. [These notifications should be submitted by 5 p.m. the next
calendar day; then updated weekly, or sooner, when there are new COVID-
19 cases, or three or more residents or staff with new-onset of respiratory
symptoms within 72 hours of each other.]
• If needed, request deployment of the Rapid Assessment Quick Response
Force.
• Screen resident for signs and symptoms at least once each shift
• Screen staff for signs and symptoms at least at the beginning of their shift
• Continue cleaning and disinfecting procedures
• Activate transport (residents in) protocols
• Establish contact with transporting/receiving agencies (hospitals, other
facilities)
• Lift of facility restrictions/lock-down
• Consider additional healthcare needs
• Maintain resident care
• [Report all deaths (COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 related) that occur in a
NF, and those that occur within 24 hours after transferring a resident to a
hospital from the NF, to HHSC via TULIP 10 working days after the last day
of the month in which the death occurred.]
Exhibit J
Texas HHSC will serve as the lead state agency in the state’s response to an LTC
COVID-19 event. HHSC actions will include:
This team will assist NFs with management of a COVID-19 event by providing subject
matter expertise, resource request management, and other support to facility actions
through initial response activities. The TCAT-LTC will remain available for a maximum
of 48 hours from activation. State and local entities will provide SMEs and continued
assistance after TCAT-LTC deactivation.
The RA-QRF team will assist NFs by providing a rapid response and medical triage
team that can be deployed by DSHS through the Emergency Medical Task Force upon
notification of a positive COVID-19 resident. The RA-QRF team will triage, assess, and
determine resource requirements for response to facilities with vulnerable populations
affected by COVID-19. If needed, an additional team can be sent to assist the facility
with immediate needs.
The RA-QRF team will provide initial triage, site assessment, review of the facility’s
policies and procedures, PPE and infection control guidelines, and provide
recommendations to help reduce the spread of COVID-19. The RA-QRF will provide
COVID-19 testing for residents and staff, provide immediate on- site training
recommendations and PPE education.
Exhibit J
To activate RA-QRF team assistance, contact the LTCR Associate Commissioner and
DSHS.
Exhibit J
FACILITY ACTIONS
REVIEW SPICE ACTIVITIES
• Directly after entering the isolation area and prior to donning PPE, perform
hand hygiene
• Put on proper PPE
• Perform hand hygiene before and after performing resident care
• Directly before exiting the isolation area, remove PPE
• Perform hand hygiene
• Exit isolation area, and directly after leaving the isolation area, perform
hygiene
• Disinfect shoes per CDC instruction
Other
HHSC ACTIONS
Prevent further disease spread
Other
EXTERNAL ACTIONS
Texas COVID-19 Assistance Team - NF
• Testing
• Resident Movement
• Emergency Management
• HAI
• LHD
• Resource Requests
DSHS
• Assessment
• Initial Response
• Onsite Coordination
• Monitoring
SPICE
for COVID-19
S urveillance
• Clinical Staff
• Support Staff
• Patient
• Supply/Burn-rate
I solate
• Patient(s) isolated
• Staff Isolated
• Others Isolated
C ommunicate
• Administrator Contact #:
• Local Health Department #:
• Department of State Health Services #:
• HHSC (TCAT)#:
• Hospital Contact #:
E valuate
Background
Because of their congregate nature and residents served (older adults often with
underlying medical conditions), NF populations are at the highest risk of serious
illness caused by COVID-19. Every effort must be made to prevent the introduction
and spread of disease within these facilities.
People at high risk for developing severe COVID-19 include those who are 65 or
older, immunocompromised (including cancer treatment), and have other high-risk
conditions such as chronic lung disease, moderate to severe asthma and heart
conditions.
People of any age with severe obesity or certain underlying medical conditions,
particularly if not well controlled, such as diabetes, renal failure, or liver disease
might also be at risk.
COVID-19 is most likely to be introduced into a facility by ill health care personnel
(HCP) or visitors. Long-term care facilities should implement aggressive visitor
restrictions and enforce sick leave policies for ill staff. Facilities must take the
extreme action of restricting visitors except in compassionate care, such as end-of-life
situations. Facilities must also restrict entry of non-essential personnel, and essential
personnel should be screened for fever and symptoms before they enter the facility to
begin their shift.
End-of-life care is the care given to people who have stopped treatment for their
disease and whose death is imminent.
1. For people allowed in the facility (in end-of-life situations when death is
imminent), instruct visitors before they enter the facility and residents’ rooms
on hand hygiene, limiting surfaces touched, and use of PPE according to
current facility policy while in the resident’s room. Screen visitors and exclude
those with fever and/or symptoms. Decisions about visitation during an end-of-
life situation should be made on a case-by-case basis.
2. Visitors who are allowed in the facility must wear a facemask while in the
building and restrict their visit to the resident’s room or other location
designated by the facility. Visitors who are not providing care to residents, such
as visitors in end-of-life scenarios, can wear a cloth face cover instead of a
facemask if no facemasks are available.
3. Facilities should communicate through multiple channels to inform people and
non-essential health care personnel of the visitation restrictions, such as
through signage at entrances/exits, letters, emails, phone calls, and recorded
messages for receiving calls.
4. In lieu of visits, facilities should consider offering alternative means of
communication for people who would otherwise visit.
5. When visitation is necessary or allowable (in end-of-life scenarios), facilities
should make efforts to allow for safe visitation for residents and loved ones.
a. Remind visitors to refrain from physical contact with residents and others
while in the facility. Practice social distancing by not shaking hands or
hugging and remaining 6 feet apart.
b. If possible (pending design of building), create dedicated visiting areas near
the entrance to the facility where residents can meet with visitors in a
sanitized environment. Facilities should disinfect rooms after each resident-
visitor meeting.
Advise visitors, and any person who entered the facility (hospice staff), to monitor for
signs and symptoms of respiratory infection and coronavirus for at least 14 days after
exiting the facility. If symptoms happen, advise them to self-isolate at home and
immediately notify the facility of the date they were in the facility, the people they
were in contact with, and the locations within the facility they visited. Facilities should
immediately screen the people of reported contact and take all necessary actions
based on findings.
Restrict non-essential personnel – Review and revise how the facility interacts
with vendors and delivery personnel, agency staff, EMS personnel and equipment,
transportation providers (when taking residents to offsite appointments, etc.), and
other non-health care providers (food delivery, etc.). This should include taking
necessary actions to prevent any potential transmission. For example, do not have
Exhibit J
supply vendors bring supplies inside the facility. Instead, have vendors drop off
supplies at a dedicated location, such as a loading dock.
Surveyors should not be restricted. CMS and state survey agencies are constantly
evaluating their surveyors to ensure they don’t pose a transmission risk when
entering a facility. For example, surveyors might have been in a facility with COVID-
19 cases in the previous 14 days, but because they were wearing PPE effectively per
CDC guidelines, they pose a low risk to transmission in the next facility and must be
allowed to enter. However, there are circumstances under which surveyors should still
not enter, such as if they have a fever or any additional signs or symptoms of illness.
Making deliveries to residents at facilities – Families and other visitors can still
deliver items (i.e., food and clothes) to residents at facilities. The facility would need
to designate a place outside where deliveries can be left. Facility staff would retrieve
the items, bring them inside, and disinfect them prior to delivering the items to the
residents. Facilities should follow CDC guidance for appropriate disinfecting
guidelines, depending on what the items are.
Active screening – The CDC and CMS recommend NFs screen all staff prior to
entering the facility at the beginning of their shift for fever and symptoms consistent
with COVID-19. Actively take their temperature and document absence of or
shortness of breath, new or change in cough, and sore throat. If they are ill, have
them put on a facemask, immediately leave the NF, and self-isolate at home.
Note: If the LHD, DSHS, or TDEM recommend that all or part of the NF staff
immediately leave the NF and self-isolate at home because they are ill, immediately
notify the HHSC LTCR Associate Commissioner or the LTCR Director of Survey
Operations.
DSHS has created a template screening log for facility staff that is available on the
DSHS website. Facilities should also screen any essential visitors who are permitted
to enter the building, including visiting health care providers. Maintain a log of all
visitors who enter the building that at minimum includes name, current contact
information, and fever and presence/absence of symptoms.
Exhibit J
Education – Share the latest information about COVID-19 and review CDC’s Interim
Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Patients with Suspected or
Confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Healthcare Settings.
Educate residents and families about COVID-19, actions the facility is taking to
protect them and their loved ones (including visitor restrictions) and actions residents
and families can take to protect themselves in the facility.
Educate and train health care personnel (HCP) and reinforce sick leave policies and
adherence to infection prevention and control measures, including hand hygiene and
selection and use of PPE. Have HCP demonstrate competency with putting on and
removing PPE. Remind HCP not to report to work when ill.
Educate facility-based and consultant personnel (wound care, podiatry, barber) and
volunteers. Including consultants is important because they often provide care in
multiple facilities and can be exposed to or serve as a source of pathogen
transmission.
Coordinate with your long-term care ombudsman to assist with education to residents
and family members. To request help from an ombudsman statewide, call 1-800-252-
2412 or email ltc.ombudsman@hhsc.state.tx.us.
People with COVID-19 have had a wide range of symptoms reported – ranging from
mild symptoms to severe illness. Symptoms may appear 2-14 days after exposure to
the virus. People with these symptoms may have COVID-19:
• Fever or chills
• Cough
• Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing
• Fatigue
Exhibit J
Symptoms of COVID-19 can vary in severity. Initially, symptoms can be mild and not
require transfer to a hospital if the facility can follow the infection prevention and
control practices recommended by CDC. Residents with known or probable COVID-19
do not need to be placed into an airborne infection isolation room (AIIR) but should
be placed in a private room with their own bathroom.
If a resident requires a higher level of care or the facility cannot fully implement all
recommended precautions, the resident should be transferred to another facility
capable of implementation. Transport personnel and the receiving facility should be
notified about the probable diagnosis prior to transfer. While awaiting transfer,
symptomatic residents should wear a facemask (if tolerated) and be separated from
others (kept in their room with the door closed). Appropriate PPE should be used by
health care personnel when encountering the resident.
Any roommates should be moved and monitored for fever and symptoms twice daily
for 14 days. Room-sharing might be necessary if there are multiple residents with
known or probable COVID-19 in the facility. As roommates of symptomatic residents
might already be exposed, it is generally not recommended to separate them in this
scenario. Public health authorities can assist with decisions about resident placement.
Create a plan for cohorting residents with symptoms of respiratory infection and
coronavirus, including dedicating HCP to work only on affected units.
If the resident is transferred to a higher level of care, perform a final, full clean of the
room, and use an EPA-registered disinfectant that has qualified under EPA’s emerging
viral pathogens program for use against COVID-19. These products can be found on
EPA’s List N.
Source control - Ill residents should wear a surgical mask when health care or other
essential personnel enter the resident’s room. If the resident cannot tolerate a
surgical mask, personnel who enter the room must wear N95 respirators, if available
Exhibit J
and staff are fit-tested. Respiratory protection should be worn in addition to gown,
gloves and face shield.
Ensure staff have been appropriately trained and fit-tested before using N95
respirators. See guidance in the section related to PPE use when caring for residents
with COVID-19.
All residents who are not ill should wear a cloth face covering for source control
whenever they leave their room or are around others, including whenever they leave
the facility for essential medical appointments.
All residents who are ill should wear a facemask at all times as tolerated, except for
when they are eating or drinking, taking medications, or performing personal hygiene
like bathing or oral care.
If COVID-19 is identified in the facility, restrict all residents to their rooms and have
HCP wear all recommended PPE for care of all residents (regardless of symptoms) on
the affected unit (or facility-wide, depending on the situation). This includes: an N95
or higher-level respirator, eye protection, gloves, and gown. HCP should be trained on
PPE use, including putting it on and taking it off.
Alternately, the NF could use other strategies for ensuring resident safety while
delivering care, including scheduling showering or bathing for residents with COVID-
19 at the end of the day so there would be less overlap with residents who do not
have COVID-19.
Exhibit J
NFs should continue to follow existing CDC recommendations for cleaning and
disinfection of equipment and surfaces in shared spaces, like common shower rooms
or equipment that must be shared between residents, between every resident use,
using the appropriate EPA-approved products for COVID-19 prevention.
HCW should also be able to wear and maintain safe use of all recommended PPE while
assisting residents with personal hygiene. Some PPE, including respirators and
facemasks, could be compromised if they get wet.
Cleaning and disinfecting the bathing or shower area - If residents with COVID-
19 have access to a private bathroom or only share a bathroom with other residents
who have the same COVID-19 status, the NF should clean and sanitize the bathroom
frequently.
If the bathing or showering area is shared by both residents who have COVID-19 and
those who don’t, clean and disinfect the area between every resident use.
Resident education - Educate residents and any visitors regarding the importance
of handwashing. Assist residents in performing hand hygiene if they are unable to do
so themselves. Education should also be provided to residents to cover their coughs
and sneezes with a tissue, then throw the tissue away in the trash and wash their
hands.
Resident testing - Inform residents that Governor Abbott has directed several
agencies, including DSHS, HHSC, and TDEM, to test 100% of residents and staff in
NFs for COVID-19. NFs will follow direction from DSHS, HHSC, and TDEM as they
develop and implement a plan to test all residents and staff.
Residents who refuse testing for COVID-19 must be isolated for 10 days and
monitored for signs and symptoms of respiratory illness and coronavirus. Staff should
wear appropriate PPE when caring for residents who refuse testing. Residents who
Exhibit J
refuse testing must not be cohorted with other residents who have tested positive for
COVID-19 or other residents who have tested negative for COVID-19.
Recovery - Work with your LHD or DSHS to establish a resident recovery plan,
including when a resident is considered recovered and next steps for care. A recovery
plan is the guidance for determining when to discontinue transmission-based
precautions and continued are of a resident. The recovery plan may be different
depending on whether a test-based or non-test-based strategy is used. Criteria
should include:
If the LHD, DSHS, or TDEM recommend that all or part of the NF staff immediately
leave the NF and self-isolate at home because they are ill, immediately notify the
HHSC LTCR Associate Commissioner or the LTCR Director of Survey Operations.
Hand hygiene - Reinforce the importance of hand hygiene among all facility staff,
including any contract staff. Facilities can increase the frequency of hand hygiene
audits and implement short in-service sessions on the proper technique for hand
hygiene.
Exhibit J
Ensure that supplies for performing hand hygiene are readily available and easily
accessible by staff. Advise staff not to keep hand sanitizer bottles in their pockets.
This practice causes hands and sanitizer bottles to become contaminated. Instead,
consider keeping alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) bottles in easily accessible areas,
and mounting ABHR to the sides of carts (dining tray carts, wound care carts,
medication carts, etc.).
Consider designating staff to steward these supplies and encourage appropriate use
by staff and residents.
PPE and Infection Control Education and Training - Ensure staff are educated
and trained on which PPE they should use, proper procedure for donning (putting on)
and doffing (taking off) PPE, and how to determine if the PPE is contaminated or
damaged.
NFs must identify whether the following concerns exist and specifically address them
through education and training:
If the NF is following the CDC's or DSHS’ guidance for optimizing the supply of PPE,
inform staff of the expectations specific to the type of PPE they are using. PPE
education and training for staff should include at least the following information:
Note: See attachment 9 about donning (putting on) and doffing (taking off) PPE, and
attachment 8 about optimizing the use of facemasks and do’s and don’ts for facemask
use. Review CDC Strategies for Optimizing the Supply of Facemasks and review the
three levels of surge capacity.
Sick leave - Review and potentially revise sick leave policies. Staff who are ill must
not come to work. Sick leave policies that do not penalize staff with loss of status,
wages, or benefits will encourage staff who are ill to stay home.
Staff testing - Inform staff that Governor Abbott has directed several agencies,
including DSHS, HHSC, and TDEM, to test 100% of residents and staff in NFs for
COVID-19. NFs will follow direction from DSHS, HHSC, and TDEM as they develop and
implement a plan to test all residents and NF staff.
Staff who refuse testing for COVID-19 must stop working, self-quarantine at home,
and self-monitor for 14 days unless they provide proof of a negative PCR test.
Work exclusion – Staff who are confirmed or probable to have COVID-19 must stay
at home. See below for guidance on when they may return to work.
Staff return to work – After being diagnosed with COVID-19, an employee can
return to work per the guidance below.
• Wear a facemask for source control at all times while in the facility. A
facemask instead of a cloth face covering should be used by these HCP for
source control while in the facility.
• A facemask for source control does not replace the need to wear an N95 or
higher-level respirator (or other recommended PPE) when indicated,
including when caring for residents with probable or confirmed COVID-19.
• Of note, N95 or other respirators with an exhaust valve might not provide
source control.
• Both the provider and the employee must take all necessary measures to
ensure the safety of everyone in the facility, including adhering to all
infection control procedures such as hand hygiene, respiratory hygiene,
and cough etiquette.
• Be restricted from contact with severely immunocompromised residents
(e.g., transplant, hematology-oncology) until 14 days after illness onset.
• Self-monitor for symptoms and seek re-evaluation from occupational health
if respiratory symptoms recur or worsen.
Exhibit J
Note: If the employee was diagnosed with a different illness (e.g., influenza) and was
never tested for COVID-19, base their return to work on the criteria associated with
that diagnosis.
Reporting COVID-19
All confirmed cases of COVID-19 must be reported to [the city health officer, county
health officer, or health unit director having jurisdiction (in instances where there is
no local health authority, report to DSHS) immediately.]
You can find contact information for your local/regional health department on the
DSHS Local Health Entities website. Work with your local health department to
complete the COVID-19 Case Report form if and when necessary.
NFs are also required to [report the first confirmed case of COVID-19 in staff or
residents, and the first confirmed case of COVID-19 after a facility has been without
cases for 14 days or more, to HHSC Complaint and Incident Intake through TULIP or
by calling 1-800-458-9858 within 24 hours of the positive test.]
[All deaths (COVID-19 and non-COVID-19) that occur in a NF, and those that occur
within 24 hours after transferring a resident to a hospital from an NF, must be
reported to HHSC through TULIP within 10 working days after the last day of the
month in which the death occurred.]
Additionally, if the LHD, DSHS, or TDEM recommend that all or part of the NF staff
immediately leave the NF and self-isolate at home because they are ill, immediately
Exhibit J
notify the HHSC LTCR Associate Commissioner or the LTCR Director of Survey
Operations.
In addition, CMS requires NF providers to report [the following weekly to the CDC via
the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN):
Starting May 8, 2020, NFs must register with the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety
Network (NHSN) for LTC facilities. Follow the guidance for LTCF COVID-19 Module
Enrollment.
No later than 11:59 p.m. Sunday, May 17, 2020 NFs must submit their first set of
data. To be compliant with the new requirement, facilities must submit the data
through the NHSN reporting system at least once every seven days.
CMS also requires NFs to keep all residents and their representatives up to date on
the conditions inside the facility, such as when new cases of COVID- 19 occur. Inform
residents, their representatives, and families by 5 p.m. the next calendar day
following the occurrence of a single confirmed infection of COVID-19 or three or more
residents or staff with new-onset of respiratory symptoms occurring within 72 hours
of each other. [Provide updates weekly, or sooner, when there are new COVID-19
cases, or three or more residents or staff with new-onset of respiratory symptoms.]
Outbreak Management
If an outbreak of COVID-19 is probable or identified in your facility, strict measures
must be put in place to halt disease transmission.
definition if your facility is awaiting test results from either a resident or paid/unpaid
staff. You are required to report probable outbreaks to your local health department,
local health authority or DSHS pending COVID-19 test results. If you suspect a
resident or staff member might have COVID-19, do not wait for test results to
implement outbreak control measures.
If you have two or more residents or staff with similar symptoms, report to your local
health authority as you would for any other cluster of illness. Maintain a low threshold
of suspicion for COVID-19 as early symptoms can be non-specific and include atypical
presentations such as diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting, among others.
Implement universal use of facemask for HCP while inside the facility. Follow the
DSHS’ guidance for optimizing the supply of PPE when deciding how long staff should
wear one facemask. Masks should be discarded upon exit, and a new mask should be
worn upon reentry.
Homemade facemasks should only be used when all other options have been entirely
exhausted and should only be used as source control. These masks are not
considered protective.
Consider having HCP wear all recommended PPE for COVID-19 (gown, gloves, eye
protection, N95 respirator) for the care of all residents, regardless of presence of
symptoms. Implement protocols for extended use of eye protection and facemasks.
Refer to DSHS’ strategies for optimizing the supply of PPE.
Restrict residents (to the extent possible) to their rooms except for medically
necessary purposes. If they leave their room, residents should wear a facemask,
perform hand hygiene, limit their movement in the facility, and keep a distance of 6
feet between themselves and other residents.
Movement and monitoring decisions for HCP with exposure to COVID-19 should be
made in consultation with local public health authorities. To learn more, refer to the
CDC’s Interim U.S. Guidance for Risk Assessment and Public Health Management of
Exhibit J
Maintain a line list of all confirmed and probable COVID-19 cases within your facility.
Include details such as name, date of birth, age, gender, whether staff or resident,
room number or job description, date of symptom onset, fever, symptoms, and
others. If your facility does not already have a line list template, you can find one on
the DSHS website.
• N95 respirator
• eye protection
• gloves
• gown
If PPE supply is limited, implement strategies to optimize PPE supply, which might
include extended use of respirators, facemasks, and eye protection, and limiting gown
use to high-contact care activities and those where splashes or sprays are
anticipated. Broader testing could be utilized to prioritize PPE supplies.
Certain types of gowns, sometimes called Level 1 or “minimal risk” gowns, do not
provide protection from splashes/sprays of blood or body fluids, depending on the
material the gown is made of. For these situations:
The NF also should train staff on how to correctly don/doff any cloth or other
alternative isolation gown; include a competency check.
Exhibit J
Review the CDC’s Strategies for Optimizing the Supply of Isolation Gowns for more
information.
N95 respirator fit testing - Under serious outbreak conditions in which respirator
supplies are severely limited, HCW may not have the opportunity to be fit-tested on a
respirator before using it. NFs should make every effort to ensure HCW who need to
use tight-fitting respirators are fit-tested to identify the right respirator for the HCW.
Under serious outbreak conditions, there may be limited availability of respirators or
fit-test kits.
If NFs cannot fit-test HCW for N95 respirators, they should follow the NIOSH guidance
for respirator use in a serious outbreak.
While it is not ideal, even without fit-testing, a respirator will provide better
protection than a facemask or using no respirator at all. NFs should assist the HCW in
choosing a respirator that fits best.
Even if HCW begin using respirators without proper fit-testing, NFs should make
every effort to perform fit-testing as respirator supplies allow. NFs should always
perform fit-testing for workers who cannot successfully seal check their own
respirators.
HCW should review the following OSHA Respiratory Protection Training Videos:
Review attachment 13, the “Three Key Factors Required for a Respirator to be
Effective” infographic.
NFs should document that the HCW has reviewed the OSHA respiratory protection
training videos.
User Seal Check - HCW wearing tight-fitting respiratory protection should perform a
user seal check each time they put on their respirator. A fit test ensures that the
respirator fits and provides a secure seal. A user seal check ensures that it’s being
worn right each time.
Exhibit J
The seal check method may vary by manufacturer and model and will be described in
the user instructions. HCW should follow the PPE manufacturer’s instructions and
recommendations for the proper use, donning, doffing, and user seal check of the
N95 respirator.
ASPR TRACIE
COVID-19 Workforce Virtual Toolkit
CDC
CDC LTC Webinar Series:
• Clean Hands
• Closely Monitor Residents
• Keep COVID-19 Out
• PPE Lessons
• Sparkling Surfaces
• Cleaning and Disinfecting Your Facility
Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Tool for Nursing Homes Preparing for
COVID-19
Interim U.S. Guidance for Risk Assessment and Work Restrictions for Healthcare
Personnel with Potential Exposure to COVID-19 -updated 06/18/2020
Symptoms of Coronavirus
CMS
CMS’ April 2, 2020 Guidance CMS Blanket (1135) Waivers
QSO 20-14 Guidance for Infection Control and Prevention of Coronavirus Disease
2019 (COVID-19) in Nursing Homes
QSO 20-29 Interim Final Rule Updating Requirements for Notification of Confirmed
and Suspected COVID-19 Cases Among Residents and Staff in Nursing Homes
DSHS
DSHS COVID-19 LTC Facility Staff Symptom Monitoring Log
Information on PPE
EPA
List N: Disinfectants for Use Against SARS-CoV-2
Exhibit J
HHS
The Difference Between Isolation and Quarantine
HHSC
CII – Reporting to HHSC
TULIP
NIOSH
Proper N95 Respirator Use for Respiratory Protection Preparedness - includes
respirator use during a serious outbreak condition
OOG
Governor Abbot’s Executive Orders
OSHA
OSHA Respiratory Protection Training Videos, including:
Design and implement a comprehensive mitigation plan. The mitigation plan must
address the specific level of infection that is discovered in the NF and include specific
actions to accomplish the following:
• Upon the first positive test result of a NF staff member or resident, work with
local health authorities, DSHS, and HHSC to coordinate testing of nursing
facility staff and residents.
• Isolate residents who are COVID-19 positive in the most effective manner
available. Consider a transfer to a different facility (possibly a COVID Positive
dedicated facility) or move them to a COVID isolation wing of the facility.
• Limit transport and movement of residents who are COVID-19 positive to
isolation or medically essential purposes only.
• Move residents who are not COVID-19 positive to areas within the NF
designated for their care.
• Staff who are confirmed to have COVID-19 must stay at home and may only
return to work in accordance with the CDC or DSHS Return to Work for
Healthcare Personnel with Confirmed or Suspected COVID-19 guidance.
• Require facility staff to only work in one facility at a time.
• Take immediate measures to inform all who interact (or may have recently
interacted) with the NF of the positive result(s) so that further limitations can
be enacted to control the spread of infection to family or other service
providers. Follow CDC, CMS and DSHS guidance, and this NF COVID-19
Response Plan.
• Implement enhanced cleaning and disinfection techniques.
• Limit all unnecessary visitation.
• To assist in controlling infection, limit access to the facility to designated
entrances only.
• Implement enhanced screening techniques
Exhibit J