Republic of the Philippines

Department of Justice
PUBLIC ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
Cabagan District Office
Cabagan, Isabela

PNP – TUMAUINI, ISABELA,

Plaintiff,
NPS Docket No. II-04-INQ-20F-
-versus- 00074
For: FRUSTRATED MURDER

EDUARDO DUMAQUET y REPANGCOL,

Respondent.
x-----------------------------------------------x

MANIFESTATION

Upon perusal of the records of the above-entitled case and based on

the available evidence at hand, accused JOHN REY BAUI DOMINGO is a
minor at the time of the alleged commission of the offense. Hence, the
accused must be released from the custody of PNP Cabagan, Isabela.
(Attached hereto is copy of the Birth Certificate of the said accused)

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

Cabagan, Isabela. June 22, 2020.

PAUL ERIC C. TAMBOA

Public Attorney II
Public Attorney’s Office
Cabagan District Office
Cabagan,Isabela
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Justice
PUBLIC ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
Cabagan District
Cabagan, Isabela

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, NPS Docket No. II-04-INQ-19K-00059

Plaintiff,

-versus- For:

“VIOLATION OF RA 9208 AS
AMENDED BY RA NO. 10364
OTHERWISE KNOWN AS
MARIA LINA ROSALES CAMBA THE”EXPANDED ANTI
ROSMITO PAGUIGAN BAUTISTA -TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS ACT
CHRISTINE RAMIREZ, OF 2012” (QUALIFIED
Accused. TRAFICKING IN PERSON)
x-----------------------------------------------x

MANIFESTATION

Upon perusal of the records of the above-entitled case and based on the
available evidence at hand, the office is of the opinion that there is no ground for
the respondents to undergo an inquest proceeding because their arrest does not
fall under Section 5 of Rule 113 on Criminal Procedure or otherwise stated, it is
beyond the reglementary period allowed by law. This is in line with the
constitutional Guarantee against deprivation of liberty without due process of
law. The 12, 18 and 36 hours will apply to those arrested without warrant. The
count will start from the time of detention of the arrested person.

This instant case does not fall on extraneous factors to be exempted from
these rules. Hence, Public Officers/ arresting authority shall be liable under
Article 125 if it can be shown that the delay in the delivery of detained person is
attended by malice, bad faith and gross negligence.

As such, respondents MUST be released and instead the case be filed

under the regular preliminary investigation.

RESEPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

Cabagan, Isabela. November 11, 2019.

ATTY. PAUL ERIC C. TAMBOA

Public Attorney II
(Pursuant to R.A. 9406)
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Justice
NATIONAL PROSECUTION SERVICE
 Cabagan, District Office
Cabagan, Isabela

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,

Plaintiffs,
II-04-INQ-18L-00133

For:
VIOLATION OF SECTION 5 OF RA 9165
-Versus-
ADJUTOR BALACANAO TABUG
Accused.
x-----------------------------------------------x

MANIFESTATION

The accused, through the Public Attorney’s Office manifest that there is no
probable cause to indict the accused for Violation of Section 5, of RA 9165 Philippine
Drug Enforcement Agency Regional Office failed to strictly comply with Section 21 of
RA 9165.

Per recent jurisprudence of the Supreme Court in People of the Philippines vs

Romy Lim, GR No. 231989 September 24, 2018, the Supreme Court stressed that “ to
weed out early on from the courts’ already congested docket any orchestrated or poorly
built up drug-related cases,” the following should be enforced as a mandatory policy in
connection with arrests and seizures related to illegal drugs.

1. In the sworn statements/affidavits, the apprehending/seizing officers must

state their compliance with the requirements of Section 21 (1) of Republic Act
9165 or Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002, and its Implementing
Rules and Regulations (IRR);

2.     In case of non-observance of the provision, the apprehending/seizing

officers must state the justification or explanation therefor as well as the steps
they have taken in order to preserve the integrity and evidentiary value of the
seized/confiscated items;

3.     If there is no justification or explanation expressly declared in the sworn

statements/affidavits, the investigating fiscal must not immediately file the case
before the court. Instead, he or she must refer the case for further preliminary
investigation in order to determine the (non) existence of probable cause; and

Perusal of the affidavit of complaining PNP witnesses shows that they failed to
strictly comply with the provisions of Section 21, RA 9165 and that the representatives
of media, elected official and the DOJ was present at the time only at the time the
inventory was conducted.

The accused must be released from detention immediately for lack of probable
cause based on the foregoing jurisprudence.
 This 3rd day of December 2018 at Cabagan, Isabela.

ADJUTOR BALACANAO TABUG

Accused

Assisted by:

MARICION B. CAPILI-GUINGAB
Public Attorney II

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 3 rd day of December 2018

at Cabagan, Isabela.

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Justice
 NATIONAL PROSECUTION SERVICE
Cabagan, District Office
Cabagan, Isabela

PNP – TUMAUINI, ISABELA,

Plaintiff,
NPS Docket No. II-04-INQ-20F-
-versus- 00074
For: FRUSTRATED MURDER

EDUARDO DUMAQUET y REPANGCOL,

Respondent.
x-----------------------------------------------x

MANIFESTATION

Upon perusal of the records of the above-entitled case and based on

the available evidence at hand, the office is of the opinion that there is no
ground for the respondent to undergo an inquest proceeding because this
complaint was filed beyond the period provided in Article 125 of the
Revised Penal Code, five days after the incident occurred on June 10,
2020.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

Cabagan, Isabela. June 15, 2020.

EDUARDO DUMAQUET y REPANGCOL

Respondent

Assisted by:

NICANOR G. GARCIA
District Public Attorney
Public Attorney’s Office
Cabagan District Office
Cabagan,Isabela

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Justice
 PUBLIC ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
Cabagan, District Office
Cabagan, Isabela

PNP – CABAGAN, ISABELA,

Plaintiff,
NPS Docket No. II-04-INQ-20H-138
For: RAPE BY SEXUAL ASSAULTOF R.A.
8353

KEVIN JAKE MACAPIA y ANGOLLUAN,

Respondent.
x-----------------------------------------------x

MANIFESTATION

Upon perusal of the records of the above-entitled case and based on the available
evidence at hand, the office is of the opinion that there is no ground for the respondent to
undergo an inquest proceeding because he was not caught in flagrante delicto nor in the process
of hot pursuit.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:

Cabagan, Isabela. May 17, 2019.

KEVIN JAKE MACAPIA y

ANGOLLUAN
Respondent

Assisted by:

JHOEY C. BUENO
Public Attorney
Public Attorney’s Office
Cabagan District Office
Cabagan,Isabela