Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
♠
♥
♦
♣
Matchpoint Adventures
An over-my-shoulder look at real-life matchpoint problems — page 9
NOTICE: Please share this issue of Bridge Today eMagazine with your partner. Better still, give him a
subscription of his own. You’ll be glad you did. He will thank you each month and he will become a better
player. Subscriptions are $33 per year for 12 monthly issues or packaged with a Bridgetoday.com $59.95
club membership. Thank you! — Matthew and Pamela Granovetter
Bridge Today • October 2007 page 2
by Matthew Granovetter
1♠ 3NT 1♥ 3NT
? ?
How is opener supposed to know that he Here you make 5♥ on a 3-2 heart break.
belongs in 4♠ and not 3NT? Let’s add the If you get a club lead vs. 3NT, you make 10
♦J to opener’s hand to stop the diamond tricks if the queen holds.
suit:
Bridge Today • October 2007 page 3
How might the auction go to 3NT on Did opener do anything terrible by bid-
these cards? ding 4♥, which plays much better than 4♠?
But if responder presses on with 5♣, they
Opener Responder may be too high. Yes, it’s that silly 3NT
♠Jxx ♠ K Q 10 x response that caused this.
♥AKQxx ♥xxx
♦AJxx ♦ K 10 x Opener Responder
♣x ♣ K Q 10 ♠AKxxx ♠Qxx
♥x ♥ Q 10 x x
1♥ 1♠ ♦KQxxx ♦AJx
2♠ 2 NT (forcing) ♣Ax ♣ K 10 x
3♦ 3 NT
pass 1♠ 3 NT
4♦ ?
Yes, responder has concealed that pre-
cious three-card heart support from opener. This time slam is on. Should opener just
But only in the interest of reaching the best bid it by himself?
contract!
Opener Responder
There are times you bid 3NT over a ma- ♠AKxxxx ♠xxx
jor and opener is really stymied because he ♥Qx ♥KJx
has extra values or shape.... ♦AKJ ♦ Q 10 x
♣xx ♣AQJx
Opener Responder
♠AKxxx ♠xxx 1♠ 3 NT
♥AKxx ♥ Q 10 x x ?
♦Ax ♦ Q 10 x
♣xx ♣AKQ This time opener has no clue what to
bid. Is 4♦ suddenly a cuebid and not a suit?
1♠ 3 NT Does anyone who plays this 3NT bid know?
4♥ ? Have you ever discussed it? Have fun!
Bridge Today • October 2007 page 4
Brilliancy or Blunder
East dealer North But not until recently, I learned that the
E-W vul ♠ A Q J 10 7 very first deal should have been played dif-
♥K8765 ferently. Just watch!
♦AJ4
♣— South dealer North
West East None vul ♠AQ
♠953 ♠62 Rubber Bridge ♥AJ984
♥Q2 ♥A ♦A83
♦ 10 8 3 ♦K92 ♣J73
♣ Q 10 7 4 2 ♣AK98653
South South
♠K84 ♠ 10 8 2
♥ J 10 9 4 3 ♥ K 10 7 5 2
♦Q765 ♦K6
♣J ♣AK9
Contract: 5♥ North ♠ A 10 5
♠ A 10 5 ♥J7
♥— ♦J432
♦432 ♣ A 10 5 3
♣ A 10 5 3 ♠KJ842 ♠9763
♥A95 N ♥83
W E
South ♦8 S ♦ K 10 7 5
♠Q ♣Q862 ♣K94
♥ Q 10 6 4 ♠Q
♦Q96 ♥ K Q 10 6 4 2
♣J7 ♦AQ96
♣J7
Then he hopes West will be “nice and
break clubs” or lead a low spade away from In the post mortem, Reese claims that
the king. But no, West plays, as Reese put leading a singleton in the hope of a ruff
it, “the very card I didn’t want to see – the when your strength is limited more often
spade king.” As you will see shortly, that gives away a trick than gains one. This view
isn’t the correct defense. is up to debate, of course (my own view is
that Reese is wrong, and I expect the edi-
With the lead in dummy, and only one tors to agree with me), and on this deal the
more entry there, it looks like Reese has to singleton lead was indeed enough for a one-
take a diamond finesse now, but there is trick set.
one trump out, and West is likely to have it
if he has only one diamond. If we back-up the situation to when West
is on lead with the ♥A, the remaining cards
Instead, Reese ruffs a spade, draws the are:
last trump, West following, and advances ♠ A 10 5
the ♣J. When West covers with the queen, ♥—
Reese has a sure line if his assumption ♦432
about the diamond suit is correct — pro- ♣ A 10 5 3
vided he can guess who has the ♣K. If he ♠KJ842 ♠9763
thinks West has it, he should duck and ♥9 W
N
E
♥—
later finesse the ♣10. But if he thinks East ♦— S ♦ 10 7 5
has the king, as he does, he should win the ♣Q862 ♣K94
ace and take a deep diamond finesse. Then, ♠Q
running the trumps forces East to come ♥ Q 10 6 4
down to two diamonds and the ♣K, after ♦Q96
which a club exit forces East to lead dia- ♣J7
monds up to Reese’s tenace.
If West “breaks clubs for declarer,” as
Nicely played! This was the full hand: Reese was hoping for, the contract can’t be
made. If he goes up ace, he has not enough
entries for the diamond finesses without
suffering a ruff; and if he ducks, East can
give West a diamond ruff.
Bridge Today • October 2007 page 8
Difficult to spot? Not at all. But once Because if East ruffs that one and leads
again Reese was so concerned with making back a club, giving a ruff and a sluff, not
his point (Don’t lead a singleton when your even a British superstar can take 12 tricks:
strength is limited!) that he forgot to check
his analysis. Human, yes, but not what we ♠AQ
should expect from the world’s best bridge ♥K876
author. ♦AJ4
♣—
Now let’s return to the Forrester deal to ♠— ♠—
see if you found the culprits. If not, here ♥Q2 N ♥—
W E
they come. ♦ 10 8 3 S ♦K92
♣ Q 10 7 4 ♣AK9865
The first blunder goes to Tony Forrester ♠—
himself for giving East the chance to defeat ♥ J 10 9 4 3
a contract that could/should have been ♦Q765
made; the second one goes to the nameless ♣—
East, who missed the chance to be a hero;
the third one goes to Reese for not checking If Forrester ruffs in hand, he will lose a
Forrester’s analysis. I also guess a fourth one diamond trick eventually; and if he ruffs
goes to me, for not realizing all this many in dummy, he can’t pick up the queen
years ago. of hearts. That, Mr. Reese, is what I call
pretty!
Now over to the truth about the deal.
But Forrester was on the right track,
♠ A Q J 10 7 when he hoped for ace singleton in hearts
♥K8765 with East. The error he made was to play
♦AJ4 three rounds of spades. Two would have
♣— been enough, and the second one should be
♠953 ♠62 won with the king. Next lead a heart. This
N
♥Q2 W E ♥A gives South the additional chance that West
♦ 10 8 3 S ♦K92 has three spades, the ♥Q singleton and the
♣ Q 10 7 4 2 ♣AK98653 ♦K (not likely, but who knows?).
♠K84
♥ J 10 9 4 3 As the cards lay, East will win the ♥A
♦Q765 and be endplayed.
♣J
Matchpoint Adventures
by Matthew Granovetter
In this article I’d like to show some per- good bridge. East, no doubt, held a single-
sonal adventures from the summer nation- ton or void in spades and therefore the
als in Nashville. The hands are all from the bad guys were cold for at least 11 tricks in
Life Master Pairs, where my partner was diamonds. So minus 100 would be a great
Rick Benstock. The first hand of the tour- score. I ducked the first club and won the
nament had me thinking it was not going to next one. The ♥Q lost to West’s king and
be my week…(positions rotated here and a third club was led to East’s queen. Next
there to make South declarer)… came the ♦10. I covered with the queen,
losing to West’s ace. Then a low diamond
West dealer North came back to East, who won the king and
None vul ♠ A K Q J 10 thought for a minute. Out came a low
♥865 trump, and West discarded a high spade.
♦42
♣752 At this point, I had East marked for
1-4-4-4 shape or 0-4-5-4 shape. If the for-
South (MG) mer I had to extract the spade now, before
♠763 playing the last trump from dummy. Other-
♥ Q J 10 9 7 wise, East would win the ♥A and pin me in
♦Q3 dummy with a spade. If the latter, I could
♣A96 just continue trumps for down two. West
was unlikely to hold five diamonds and
West North East South not compete to 4♦, but East was unlikely
pass pass 1♦ 1♥ to hold a void in spades and not compete
double* 2♥ pass pass to 4♦ or double 3♥. I elected to go for the
3♦ 3♥ (all pass) extraction play, because if I was wrong, they
would be cold for 12 tricks in diamonds,
*showing 4+ spades and if I led trumps again and got pinned
in dummy with a spade, they would be
My opponents were using the newfangled cold for only 150. In other words, I based
negative double to show any number of my play on what they could make if I was
spades, while a 1♠ response over my 1♥ wrong. But East ruffed the first round of
would show fewer than four spades with spades and said: “Thanks, finally I got my
nothing good to bid. ruff. I wish you were my partner!”
West led the ♣J and dummy was a fasci- Oops. I slid under the table a little. Well,
nating sight: 150 honors, but in spades! Oh, down three, minus 150, turned out to be a
well, this was not the old rubber bridge days good score too, as expected. That’s because
anyway. It looked like down two would be the field was going plus 170 the other way:
Bridge Today • October 2007 page 10
♠87654 ♠ Q 10 ♠976
What’s the best play for the most tricks? Or were they:
have played the 6 and 9 or 7 and 9, but falsecard. A more dramatic example is:
chose the 6 and 7.
Dummy
Dummy A Q 10 2
♠K8432 West East
J965 7
Declarer Declarer
♠AJ5 K843
A more practical point, however, is that Now on the lead of the ace, West must
when a spade is led toward dummy, West drop the 9 to give you a chance to go
doesn’t falsecard with the 10 so much (with- wrong. Otherwise, your only chance will be
out the 9), because it could be a losing play to lead low to the king on the second round,
if his partner has A-J-x. While if the king planning to finesse West for the jack if the
had been led from dummy, it would be easy suit breaks 4-1. But if West drops the 9 on
to falsecard the 10. On this day, I had the the first round, it might be a singleton and
Q-10 doubleton and was just following suit. declarer may decide to cash the queen next,
The lesson here is that if you’re playing playing East for four cards in the suit.
this suit, don’t start the king from dummy.
Instead lead toward the king. This will help Leading the 3 first, however, inhibits this
prevent West from falsecarding. There is 9 play, doesn’t it?
probably a whole list of holdings that would
make an interesting study of which direc-
tion you lead a suit, where it seemingly Rick and I were playing the old 4-card
doesn’t matter. Here’s one example: major opening system of Ira Rubin, which
led to some interesting contracts, such as:
Dummy
A Q 10 2 North
♠Q876
Declarer ♥Q76532
K943 ♦6
♣82
You know nothing of the distribution
and you want to first cash a top honor in South
dummy and then decide who might have ♠A32
a singleton, if the suit is breaking 4-1. Nor- ♥ A J 10 4
mally, if you see a 7 or 8 played, you would ♦ K 10 3
play that player for the singleton. So with ♣ K 10 9
J-8-6-5, for example, your opponent should
falsecard the 8. South West North East
1♥ pass 4♥ (all pass)
If you cash the ace first, it will be easier
for your opponent to play the 8 from J-8-7- West led a club. The ♣A and ♥K were
6, but if you start the suit by leading the 3 with East, and the ♠K was with West. Ten
toward dummy’s queen, it will inhibit the tricks, an easy game.
Bridge Today • October 2007 page 12
Playing the “system” I ended up declarer At this point I had two trumps in my
on this one: hand, but three clubs in dummy. This was
the position:
East dealer North
Both vul ♠K9732 ♠973
♥QJ2 ♥Q
♦— ♦—
♣ K 10 7 6 3 ♣ 10 7 6
West East ♠Q ♠—
♠ Q 10 8 ♠J ♥— N ♥ 10 9 8
W E
♥84 ♥ 10 9 8 6 3 ♦542 S ♦AK98
♦542 ♦AK9873 ♣J52 ♣—
♣AQJ52 ♣4 ♠65
South ♥A
♠A654 ♦ Q J 10 6
♥AK5 ♣—
♦ Q J 10 6
♣98 A thought occurred to me. West might
not want to use his high trump to ruff with,
West North East South because he may not realize that it’s safe to
— — pass 1♠ lead a diamond. So I led the ♥Q to the
pass 3 NT* pass 4♠ ace and West was on my wavelength. He
(all pass) discarded a diamond. Now I was set up for
a small trump coup. I ruffed a diamond,
*support in spades with an unspecified shortness ruffed a club, ruffed a diamond, ruffed a
club and led a diamond at trick 12, scoring
West led the ♥8. I wanted to set up my ♠9 in dummy en passant. Scoring 650
clubs, but if I drew two rounds of trumps was worth a near top score.
and they broke 3-1, a defender might gain
the lead and draw a third round of trumps.
So I won the lead in hand and immediately I would like readers’ opinion on board
led the ♣8. West won the ace. This was 9. We were up against a two well-known
a bad hand for upside-down carding, as players, but in a first-time partnership. Try
the ♣4 could be from 9-4. But East-West bidding this hand:
were using normal carding. Nevertheless,
West thought his partner did not wish to ♠ Q 10 6 5
release the 9. West continued hearts. I won ♥32
in dummy and cashed two trumps, end- ♦Q652
ing in my hand, followed by a club toward ♣K95
dummy. Again, this was better than being
in dummy and cashing the ♣K. West felt At favorable, your partner opens 1♥. You
obliged to split his honors. The ♣K won respond 1♠ and partner rebids 2♦. There’s
but East showed out. been no bidding by the opps. What is your
rebid?
Bridge Today • October 2007 page 13
Yes, 6NT is ice cold. The spades were What would you do on this balancing
3-3, so you can duck the diamond lead and situation? You hold the South hand, vul vs.
run five spades and three hearts: North not: ♠ 9 ♥ J 9 6 5 2 ♦ K Q 6 5 4 ♣ A 8
held four diamonds and three clubs, and is
squeezed. So much for being in the “right” West North East South
contract. at matchpoints. — — pass pass
1♣ pass pass ?
What do you open in second seat vul vs. It’s true, the opponents could hold a
not with: big spade fit, but I can’t imagine passing at
♠J4 ♥J ♦AKQ7654 ♣J32 matchpoints when I have a decent 5-5 and
we could be on for a game our way. Does
Would you risk the gambling 3NT if it partner have to bid over 1♣ with, for ex-
showed no outside ace or king?
Bridge Today • October 2007 page 15
North dealer North hand with a spade. I won and played an-
None vul ♠QJ85 other spade. East ruffed and got out with
♥A953 his last trump.
♦A732
♣Q There I was with two diamond losers still
West East staring me in the face. Oh well, I cashed the
♠963 ♠4 ♦A next, as a prelude to running the spades
♥J ♥ Q 10 6 2 and leading a second diamond, but East
♦Q964 ♦ K 10 spotted the endplay coming and dropped
♣ K 10 7 5 3 ♣J98642 the ♦K under the ace! Oy vey. I was about
South (moi) to cash some more spades when I stopped
♠ A K 10 7 2 myself. Good grief, what if he started with
♥K874 K-10 doubleton! He’s liable to discard the
♦J85 ♦10 next! So I led another diamond and
♣A ducked it, then wiped my brow as he re-
turned a club for the ruff-sluff and my con-
West North East South tract. Making four was worth a bit under
— 1♦ pass 1♠ average. The field were mostly playing 4♠,
pass 2♠ pass 3♥ and some were making five after a heart
pass 4♥ (all pass) to the ace picked up the heart suit for one
loser and the eventual endplay on East in
Would you have bid 4♠ with my hand diamonds brought in another trick.
or 3♥? I decided to bid it out, in case 4♥
was a better spot. Wrong again… At some tables West led the ♥J against
4♠ and this turned out nicely when de-
West led a club to my ace. I cashed the clarers thought it might be from J-10-x-x.
♥K, smartly playing West for the length So they ran it to the king. Welcome to the
in trumps. Then the ♥8, show out, ugh. I “wrong again” club! They matched my
let East win the trick and he got out of his score of 620. Have a nice October.
Bridge Today • October 2007 page 17
by Pietro Campanile
Terence Reese used to claim that he This was the typical auction. Four hearts
never played in a 2NT contract if he could is very reasonable contract but unfortu-
help it. His theory was that whenever there nately the black suits layout means that
were seven tricks available, he could usu- there are four unavoidable top losers which
ally find an eighth through his superior condemn it to failure. However, a curi-
technique and once he had his eight tricks ous thing happened at my table: For some
in the bag he would just wait for a defen- inexplicable reason West, who needed to
sive mistake to bring him the ninth and find three pitches when I drew trumps and
the contract! This view may be extreme, led four rounds of diamonds, held on to all
especially for those of us who cannot claim his spades and bared the ♣A. I now had a
to have Reese’s declarer play skills, but it perfect count of the hand, thanks to West’s
is true that defenders sometimes make the 1♠ overcall and East’s pass over 2♠ (which
strangest mistakes. For instance playing last would not have happened if he held ♣A-K
month in a simultaneous pairs in Tel Aviv, I and some spades), and simply played a club
came across this board: to West’s ♣A, waiting for my tenth trick
from the spade return. A nice example of a
East dealer North self-strip and endplay, which I aptly named
N-S vul ♠J2 the “Harakiri Endplay,” because the victim
♥AJ8 has to actively collaborate in order to be
♦A942 well and truly “fixed.” Surely this does not
♣ 10 9 8 5 happen to champions and top class experts,
West East I hear you say. True, it does not usually
♠AQ953 ♠ 10 8 6 4 happen but it does happen sometimes as the
♥52 ♥964 following hand will demonstrate.
♦83 ♦ 10 7 6
♣A732 ♣KJ6 Let us move to the recently concluded
South USA Summer Nationals in Nashville, Ten-
♠K7 nessee. In one of the many events played
♥ K Q 10 7 3 in the ten days of the Nationals, a team
♦KQJ5 including my wife, Migry Zur Campanile,
♣Q4 and Valerie Westheimer, Michael Barel,
Yaniv Zack and the Herbst brothers (the
West North East South latter four from Israel) faced the strong Ma-
— — pass 1♥ haffey team (Bertheau-Nystrom; Fu-Zhao;
1♠ 2 ♠* pass 4♥ Lair-Mahaffey). One of the boards to swing
(all pass) the result in favor of my wife’s team was a
pretty curious one.
*At least a limit raise in hearts
Bridge Today • October 2007 page 18
Here are some highlights from the East led the ♠5 and declarer won in
Spingold Teams at the ACBL summer na- hand with the king. There was no time to
tionals in Nashville. play on clubs so declarer simply cashed the
top diamonds and must have been delight-
All Quiet on the Eastern Front ed with East’s contribution. He claimed 10
The first set of the Round of 16 match tricks and +430. Notice it would do declarer
between Cayne (the #2 seed: Charlie Weed no good to take a finesse in diamonds on
NPC, James Cayne and Michael Seamon, the second round, since if East held a single-
playing with Italians Alfredo Versace and ton honor, West would hold four of them.
Lorenzo Lauria, and Fulvio Fantoni and
Claudio Nunes) and Mahaffey (the #18 Closed Room
seed: Jim Mahaffey and Mark Lair, play- West North East South
ing with China’s Zhao Jie and Fu Zhong, Cayne Lair Seamon Mahaffey
and Sweden’s Fredrik Nystrom and Peter — 1♦ (all pass)
Bertheau) was a low scoring affair (27 to
14), but there were many points of inter- Declarer made the same ten tricks for
est. This deal shows how keeping quiet can +130, but that was 7 imps for Cayne.
sometimes be effective. At one table East
overcalled and at the other East passed:
On this deal, North-South in the Closed
North dealer North Room had an accident but survived.
None vul ♠K3
♥AK North dealer North
♦AK9876 All vul ♠92
♣J98 ♥ K 10 7
West East ♦KQ4
♠ Q J 10 4 ♠A9752 ♣AKQ73
♥QJ86 ♥97432 West East
♦432 ♦QJ ♠ Q 10 8 7 4 ♠K5
♣K7 ♣Q ♥A8 ♥9642
South ♦J75 ♦ 10 8 6 2
♠86 ♣J52 ♣ 10 9 6
♥ 10 5 South
♦ 10 5 ♠AJ63
♣ A 10 6 5 4 3 2 ♥QJ53
♦A93
Open Room ♣84
West North East South
Bertheau Lauria Nystrom Versace In the Open Room, Lauria opened 1NT
— 1♦ 1♠ pass with the North cards and was soon in 3NT,
2♠ 2 NT pass 3 NT +690. In the Closed Room:
(all pass)
Bridge Today • October 2007 page 20
North dealer North There was only one double figure swing
All vul ♠92 in the second quarter of the match:
♥ K 10 7
♦KQ4 West dealer North
♣AKQ73 None vul ♠832
West East ♥ 10 2
♠ Q 10 8 7 4 ♠K5 ♦QJ76
♥A8 ♥9642 ♣ A 10 9 6
♦J75 ♦ 10 8 6 2 West East
♣J52 ♣ 10 9 6 ♠9765 ♠ J 10 4
South ♥97 ♥Q8654
♠AJ63 ♦ 10 9 5 4 3 ♦K8
♥QJ53 ♣Q5 ♣872
♦A93 South
♣84 ♠AKQ
♥AKJ3
West North East South ♦A2
Cayne Lair Seamon Mahaffey ♣KJ43
— 1♣ pass 1♥
pass 2 NT pass 3♦ Open Room
pass 3♥ pass 3 NT West North East South
pass 4♥ pass 4♠ Jie Fantoni Zhong Nunes
pass 5♣ pass 5♦ pass pass pass 1 ♣ (1)
pass 6♥ (all pass) pass 1 ♠ (2) pass 2 ♥ (3)
pass 2 ♠ (4) pass 3 NT
There are certainly pairs who play that a pass 4 NT pass 6♣
jump to 2NT in this situation does not deny (all pass)
four-card support for partner, but it’s not
clear if that was the position here. If 3♦ (1) 14+ with clubs or 15+ balanced
was a check-back for heart support or four (2) 0-11, no 4-card major
spades, it’s not clear why North corrected (3) Kokish relay, hearts or a big notrump range
3NT to 4♥. If 3♦ was a transfer to hearts, (4) Which is it?
North was on track but South had forgot-
ten. In any event, North-South propelled By the time South bid 3NT he was
themselves to slam. known to hold a huge balanced hand, so
North made a general try with 4NT.
West needed to lead a spade to defeat
this contract, but he tried the ♦5 and now South won the spade lead, cashed the top
declarer could win and attack trumps. West hearts and played a heart. West discarded a
took the first round and played a second spade and declarer ruffed and advanced the
diamond. Declarer won, drew trumps and ♦Q, covered by the king and ace. He ruffed
with fingers crossed set about the clubs. The another heart, cashed the ♣A and ran the
3-3 split meant he was +1430 – 12 imps to ten to West’s queen. He took the diamond
Mahaffey, who trailed 27-14 at the end of return in dummy, ruffed a diamond and
the set. claimed, +920.
Bridge Today • October 2007 page 21
*See the text below. Versace and Lauria were East-West for
the Cayne team, but we’re not sure who’s
This time North-South had a major ac- in which seat. Against 5♦, East led a spade
cident in the bidding. South clearly thought and declarer played a dummy reversal, ruff-
they were playing Kokish (where 2♥ is ing spades, drawing trumps, and then at-
either hearts or a 25-26 point hand) so he tacking clubs, scoring six trump tricks, four
had shown a balanced hand, but North clubs and the ♥K, an amazing +550.
obviously thought his partner had a heart
suit. Open Room
South West North East
West led a diamond to the queen, king Nunes Bertheau Fantoni Nystrom
and ace and declarer played a low heart to pass pass 1 NT (12-14) double
dummy’s ten and East’s queen. He won the redouble* pass 2♣ 4♠
diamond return in dummy, cashed three (all pass)
rounds of hearts followed by three rounds
of spades and two top clubs. Then a third *It would have been better for Nunes if he had a
club cashed for 11 tricks, +450, but 10 imps way to show both minors in one bid. — editor
for Cayne.
South led the ♦J. North took the first
Mahaffey’s team made a strong start to two tricks and exited with a spade. De-
the third quarter even though at one table clarer drew trumps and led a club to the
declarer missed a beautiful opportunity: ace, North dropping the queen! He ruffed
Bridge Today • October 2007 page 22
a club, North playing the king! Now he At this point if declarer ruffs a club and
crossed to dummy with a spade.... then plays a spade to dummy, he squeezes
South. If South pitches a heart, declarer can
♠— play ♥A, heart. If South pitches the ♦10,
♥J852 declarer can exit with a club, endplaying
♦9 South.
♣ 10
♠ 10 ♠Q97 On the system card I saw North’s 1NT
N
♥ 10 4 3 W E ♥AQ6 was 12-14 and he had already shown up
♦— S ♦— with the ♠J, ♦A-Q and ♣K-Q, so he could
♣87 ♣— not have the ♥K. Perhaps then declarer
♠— should have found the winning line. As it
♥K97 was, he took a heart finesse and was one
♦ 10 down, -100. But he still won 10 imps!
♣J9
*A Swedish auction, which the author will partially There is an old theory that slam deals
decipher. come in pairs – this was the next board:
Bridge Today • October 2007 page 27
South transferred over North’s 14-16 By the way, the last two quarters of this
notrump, and when North broke the trans- match were two of the best you will ever
fer they were again in the sort of game they see between eight Titans of the game. The
make their living from. score of the third quarter was 30 to 22 for
Schwartz. Nevertheless, Nickell advanced to
East led the ♠Q and West overtook it, the semis.
cashed another spade, and switched to the
♣5. Declarer put up the ace and had only
to divine the heart position to make the Next month: a look at the Spingold
contract (the chance of making four tricks semifinals and finals
is around 52.56%). The only information
you have to go on is West’s possession of the AND ...
♠A-K and perhaps with the ♥A as well he
might have taken a bid. The world championships in Shang-
hai!
Declarer played a low heart from his
hand and when the queen held he played a AND ...
second heart and claimed +420.
A sneak preview of String Bidding!