Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
PATIALA , PUNJAB
Law of contracts
Certificate
We would also like to express our gratitudeof Submission
to Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Patiala
for giving us the topic that enriched my knowledge.
We also like to thank the library staff for
constant support.
This
Lastlyis we
to certify
thank that thisparents
to our project and
(difference
friends between
for their void , voidable
constant andand
support valid contract ) isin the
coordination
submitted
completiontoofRajiv Gandhi work.
the research National University of Law, Patiala in partial fulfilment of the
requirement of the B.A. LLB (Hons.) course. It is an original and bona-fide research work
carried under my supervision and guidance. No part of this project has been submitted to
any University for the award of any Degree or Diploma, whatsoever.
Agreement
The Indian Contract Act, 1872 defines what we mean by “Agreement”. In its section 2 (e), the
Act defines the term agreement as “every promise and every set of promises, forming the
consideration for each other”. Now that we know how the Act defines the term “agreement”,
there may be some ambiguity in the definition of the term promise.
Promise :-This ambiguity is removed by the Act itself in its section 2(b) which defines the term
“promise” here as: “when the person to whom the proposal is made signifies his assent
thereto, the proposal is said to be accepted. Proposal when accepted, becomes a promise”.
In other words, an agreement is an accepted promise, accepted by all the parties involved in
the agreement or affected by it. This definition thus introduces a flow chart or a sequence of
steps that need to be triggered in order to establish or draft a contract.
Contract = Accepted Proposal (Agreement) + Enforceable by law (defined within the law)
A contract is an accepted proposal (agreement) that is fully understood by the law and is legally
defined or enforceable by the law. So a contract is a legal document that bestows upon the
parties special rights (defined by the contract itself) and also obligations which are introduced,
defined and agreed upon by all the parties of the contract.
Valid contract :-
A valid contract is a written or expressed agreement between two parties to provide a product
or service. There are essentially six elements of a contract that make it a legal and binding
document. In order for a contract to be enforceable, it must contain:
Consideration, or the money or something of interest being exchanged between the parties
Object of a contract is legal and not against public policy or in violation of law
In other words, a contract is enforceable when both parties agree to something, back the
promise up with money or something of value, both are in sound mind and intend to carry out
their promise and what they promise to do is within the law.
So, if Dennis offers to sell a puppy to Jean for the sum of $500 and Jean delivers the cash for the
canine, providing Jean and Dennis are of age, the dog is rightfully Dennis' to sell and there is
nothing illegal about the transaction, the parties have a valid contract. There are contracts that
do not contain all of the elements, and for those contracts, the courts make the determination
as to whether the contract can be enforced.
According to the Contract Act, 1872, the requirements for a valid contract are the Agreement
and Enforceability:
Agreement
The first recruitment of a valid contract is an agreement. Every promise and all set of promises,
forming the consideration for each other is an agreement. When a person to whom the
proposal is made defines his assent, the proposal is said to be accepted. A proposal, when
accepted, becomes a promise.
An agreement is valid when one party makes a proposal or offer to other party signifies his
assent. The following are required for a valid agreement. The agreement must be between two
persons. It is required to be between an offeror and an of free, who accepts the o0ffers
becomes an acceptor. Both these parties should be different persons, as one cannot enter into
an agreement with himself. Both the offeror and offeree in the same sense and at the same
time should understand the agreement.
Enforceability
An agreement to mature into a contract must create legal obligation as per the provision of
contract laws that is a duty enforceable by law. Any agreement which does not create any
enforceability, i.e. where the parties do not have a right to approach the court of law to avail
legal remedy for breach of contract will not be a contract.
All offers must be valid and once accepted, it binds both the parties into a valid agreement. The
offree is now an acceptor, and thus the agreement is made between an offeror and an
acceptor. The adjective lawful suggests that the offer and acceptance must satisfy the
recruitments of the contract act in relation.
Legal relationship
Parties to a contract must desire to constitute a legal relationship. It results when the parties
know that if any one of them fails to fulfil his/her part of the promise, he/she would be liable
for the failure of the contract. If there is no desire to create a legal relationship, there is no
contract between the parties. Agreements of social or domestic natures, which do not
contemplate a legal relationship, are not contracts.
Lawful consideration
Consideration is described as something in return. It is also vital for the validity of the contract.
A promise to do something or to provide something without anything in return will not be
enforceable at law and, therefore, will not be valid. Consideration need not be in kind or cash. A
contract without consideration is a wagering contract or betting. Besides, the consideration
must also be lawful.
Competency of parties
The parties to an agreement should be capable of contracting. In other words, they should be
capable of entering into the contract. According to the Contract act, every person is competent
to contract who is the age of majority to which he/she is subject to and who is of the sound
mind and is not disqualified from the contracting by any law to which he/she is subject. Thus,
according to the contract act, every person with the exception of the following is competent to
enter into a contract:
A minor
A person expressly declared disqualified to get into a contract under any Law
Free consent
Another essential of the valid contract is the consent of parties, which should be free. As per
the Contract Act, two or more parties are said to consent when they agree upon the same
things in the same sense. The consent is considered free when any of the following things do
not induce it:
Coercion
Misrepresentation
Fraud
Undue influence
Mistake
Lawful objects
According to Contract act, an agreement may become a valid-contract only, if it is for a lawful
consideration and lawful object. The below-mentioned considerations and objects are not
lawful as per the Contract Act
If it is forbidden by law
If it is fraudulent
The agreements may be oral or in writing. When the agreement is in writing it should comply
with all legal formalities as to attestation and registration. If the agreement does not abide by
the requisite legal formalities, the law cannot enforce it.
Certainty
To give rise to the valid contracts, the terms of the must not be vague or uncertain. Ascertaining
the meaning of the agreement for must be possible. Otherwise, it cannot be enforced.
Possibility of Performance
The agreement must have been expressly declared to be void under the contract laws. This act
specifies certain types of agreement that have been expressly declared to be void. The
following agreements have been declared as void under the Contract Act.
voidable contract
It is a formal agreement between two parties that may be rendered unenforceable for a
number of legal reasons. Reasons that can make a contract voidable include the following:
A breach of contract
A voidable contract is originally considered to be legal and enforceable but can be rejected by
one party if the contract is discovered to have defects. If a party with the power to reject the
contract chooses not to reject the contract despite the defect, the contract remains valid and
enforceable. Most often, only one of the parties is adversely affected by agreeing to a voidable
contract in which that party fails to recognize the misrepresentation or fraud made by the other
party.
These types of Contracts are defined in section 2(i) of the Act: “An agreement which is
enforceable by law at the option of one or more of the parties thereto, but not at the option of
the other or others, is a voidable contract.” This may seem difficult to wrap your head around
but consider the following example:
Suppose a person A agrees to pay a sum of Rs. 10,0000 to a person B for an antique chair. This
contract would be valid, the only problem is that person B is a minor and can’t legally enter a
contract. So this contract is a valid contract from the point of view of A and a “voidable”
contract from the point of view of B. As and when B becomes a major, he may or may not agree
to the terms. Thus this is a voidable contract. A voidable contract is a Valid Contract. In a
voidable contract, at least one of the parties has to be bound to the terms of the contract. For
example, person A in the above example.
The other party is not bound and may choose to repudiate or accept the terms of the contract.
If they so choose to repudiate the contract, the contract becomes void. Otherwise, a voidable
contract is a valid contract.
Voidable contract is :- One or both parties has not disclosed a material fact.
Void contract :-
Void contract isdefined by Section 2(j) vi:., a contract which ceases to be enforceable
bylaw is a void contract since the time it ceases to be enforceable.
INTRODUCTION :-
All agreements may not be enforceable at law. Only those agreements which fulfillthe
essentials laid down in section 10 can be enforced. The Indian Contract Actspecifically
declares certain agreements to be void. According to section 2(g)
, an agreement not enforceable by law is void. Such an agreement does not give rise to
any legal consequences and is void ab initio
. Agreement by a Minor or a Person of Unsound Mind:A person who has not completed
his or her 18 years of age signifies as minor. Lawacts as the guardian of minors and
protects their rights, because their mentalfacilities are not mature- they do not possess
the capacity of judge what is goodand what is bad for them. Accordingly, where is a
minor charged with obligationsand the other contracting party seeks to enforce those
obligations against theminor, the agreement is deemed as void.A person who does not
possess a sound mind or whose mental powers are notarranged or whose mental
condition is not under his or her own control. Anyagreement by person of unsound
mind is absolutely void because he has nocapacity to judge, what is good and what is
bad for him.
Illustrations
(a) A, 15 years old boy, made an agreement with B to give him Tk.1000. This is a void
agreement.
(b) A mentally disordered man made an agreement with X to marry her, but this is not a
valid agreement.
I) It is expressed in writing and registered under the law for the time beingenforce for
the registration of (documents), and is made on account ofnatural love and affection
between parties standing in a near relation toeach other; or unless.
7
Illustrations
b) A, for natural, love and affection, promises to give his son, B Tk.1000. Aputs his
promise to B into writing and registers it. This is a contract.
c) A finds be B’s purse and gives it to him. B promises to give A Tk.50. This isa contract.
d) A supports B’s infant son. B promises to pay A’s expenses in so doing. Thisis a
contract.
Agreements in Restraint of Marriage: Every individual enjoy the freedom tomarry and so
according to
section 26
of the contract act “every agreement isrestraint of the marriage of any person, other
than a minor, is void.” The restraintmay be general or partial but the agreement is void,
and therefore, an agreementagreeing not to marry at all, or a certain person or, a class
of persons, or for a fixedperiod, is void. However, an agreement restraint of the
marriage of a minor is validunder the section. This section enact that agreement in
restraint of the marriage ofany person, other than a minor is void. In the interest of the
society, contracts formarriage are scrutinized with a close and vigilant suspicion of
undue influence,fraud or imposition. So the law—
(II) Avoid all such contracts as tend to the deceit and injury, or encourageartifices and
improper attempts to control the exercise of free judgment;
9
D
IFFERENCES
B
ETWEEN
V
OID
A
GREEMENT &
V
OIDABLE
C
ONTRACT
Contract law is complex and can be confusing. Void agreements orcontracts and
voidable contracts are similar enough in name to be almostindistinguishable, but legally
significant differences exist between the two.Related Searches …..
A void agreement, or void contract, is a contract that is not truly a contract. Itmay have
been made under duress as an agreement to commit an illegalaction or as a contract to
perform an impossible duty.
Voidable Contract
Voidable contracts are contracts that are legally valid agreements betweentwo parties;
however, they can be voided or nullified by one of the parties.Voidable contracts most
frequently involve contracts made with minors, whoare not bound to fulfill the contract
in most states.
Legal Differences
A void contract is a nonexistent and illegal contract that cannot be upheld bylaw;
neither party is bound to complete the contract and can be prosecutedif any completed
actions are illegal. Voidable contracts are legal and bindingto at least one party, which
must fulfill his portion of the contract.
Significance
Void contracts may be a cause for lawsuits or jail time depending on thecontext of the
agreement and whether or not action was taken. Voidablecontracts can be detrimental
to the bound party unless the contract isnullified by the individual who is not bound by
the contract.
Considerations
Knowing the basics of contract law can help an individual recognize asituation where a
contract may be void or voidable. Understand thedifference between those types of
contracts before engaging in legalagreements.
Conclusion :-
To conclude, contract law is a complex type of law which is divided in many parts to make sure
it little bit simple. There are many contracts which are valid, but sometimes due to certain
circumstances, they cease to be enforceable which makes them a void contract because it is
impossible that the contract is to be further executed. Similarly, many people unlawfully induce
or persuade the will of another person to enter into a contract, which becomes voidable at the
option of the party whose consent was so induced. By the conclusion it can be said that
agreement is the essential part of a contract.According to sec 2(g) of the Contract Act 1872, an
agreement not enforceable bylaw is void. Such an agreement does not give rise to any legal
consequences andis void ab initio From section 11 to 56 of the Contract Act 1872 there
mentionedvarious agreements which are void in nature. Though it looks similar, but there
issome differences between void agreement and voidable contract.
REFERENCES
Business Dictionary
The Difference between a Void Agreement & a Voidable Contract:by Bailey Shoemaker
Richards
Wikipedia
Law of Contract
Avtar Singh, Contract and Specific Relief. 10th Ed. Allahabad, Eastern Book Company, 2010.
Bangia, R.K., Indian Contract Act. 11th Ed. Faridabad, Allahabad Law Agency, 2009
Indian Contract Act,1872
Websites:-
https://www.britannica.com/
https://www.upcounsel.com/
www.Legalservicesindia.com