Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
18 August 2020
Page 1
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION
An Elephant which can Dance
The government, in its budget in Feb. 2020, expressed intention to list LIC in the current fiscal. LIC is the largest and oldest life insurer with a balance sheet size of over
Rs 32 trillion. In this report, we have delved into public disclosure & annual reports of LIC and attempted to arrive at plausible Embedded Value and Valuation.
Key Highlights COMPANY UPDATE
Implicit sovereign guarantee and productive distribution aided in-line growth with the industry: LIC enjoys implicit sovereign guarantee and has the most productive 18 August 2020
agency channel. A combination of both has aided it to maintain growth in-line with the industry. This growth is commendable as LIC has largely exited linked products
since the promulgation of ULIP norms in FY11. The bulk of the Pvt. insurers growth during FY14-19 was ULIP-led. Hence, we believe, in the current environment where the Total Mcap/
Global Life
Asset Total
ULIP demand is weak, it shall report better growth than Pvt insurers and increase market share. Historical data suggest LIC gains market share when ULIP demand is weak. Insurers
(USD bn.) Assets
A behemoth that maintained a balanced growth driven by value & volume; significant scope to improve ticket size: Unlike a few large private peers, LIC’s Individual
annualized premium equivalent (APE) growth in the last 5 years was driven by both an increase in the ticket size (ATS) and number of new policies. However, the LIC’s avg. L&G 505 3%
Individual APE per policy at Rs. 14K is significantly lower vs. Pvt insurers’ Rs.60K in FY20. We believe, given its pan-India reach, LIC could grow at a significantly better rate
than the industry if it manages to increase its ATS. The ATS in 4MFY21 increased to Rs. 23K and if this sustains, it shall grow better than the industry in FY21E. Aviva 460 4%
Removal of 80C exemptions could significantly dent LIC: Given its ticket size, most of LIC’s customers would buy life policies to avail 80C benefit on income tax. The Lincoln 335 4%
current fiscal budget has given an option to personal income-tax payers to move to lower-income tax slabs by not availing any exemption such as 80C. We believe this
shall not impact LIC immediately as most of its customers would be middle-class (with annual income less than Rs.1mn) and would be better off in old tax structure. Samsung Life 246 5%
However, if the government’s medium-term objective is to remove all exemptions & deductions (incl. 80C), it shall structurally impact LIC significantly.
LIC enjoys strong Banca tie-up but it hardly contributes to new business: LIC agent’s productivity, in terms of premium and number of policies, is the best in the industry. Metlife 740 6%
This is reflected in the disproportionate contribution of agency channel (95% of APE) and savings business to LIC’s APE. LIC has one of the best bancassurance tie-ups, but
it has hardly capitalized on it to grow the business. Hence, an incremental focus on banca could result in better growth in high margin products such as protection. Principal Fin. 276 6%
Online term to increase traction in protection business: Since LIC depend heavily on agency channel, the protection business did not see traction as it was significantly
LIC 427 14%
expensive vs. private peers. Further, the agency channel did not prefer to sell this product due to lower ticket size resulting in lower commission income to them. Now, LIC
has launched online products where pricing is very competitive vs. many large private insurers. Also, it enjoys an implicit sovereign guarantee and hence, we expect Prudential 454 11%
protection growth to pick up going ahead. However, LIC’s presence is not prominent in web-aggregator and banca channel, where protection is easily sold.
Individual business is Par-heavy; group contribution steadily rising: LIC’s individual business is skewed to Par. Given its BS structure and the way it funds solvency from New China L 127 15%
Par business (policyholders surplus is calculated post deduction of available solvency margin(ASM) from the controlled fund) always keep LIC Par-heavy. Unlike Pvt. peers,
who share 90% of surplus to policyholders, LIC share 95%. The Non-Par business is largely annuity and group (which is less capital intensive for no sum assured). The China Life 539 23%
group contribution has steadily increased and it contributes ~30% to APE in FY20 (vs 11% in FY13) & ~70% to unweighted new business premium (vs. 45% in FY13).
AIA Group 284 45%
Par-heavy business makes it self-funded - Solvency is least of concerns: LIC funds solvency requirements from Par surplus (as policyholder’s surplus is distributed after
deducting solvency cost). Hence, LIC shall always operate close to bare minimum solvency margin requirement of 150% and this would not hamper its ability to grow.
BS is better than perception: LIC’s non-linked AUM has 73% as G-Secs and 13% as equity. Exposure to corporate bonds was ~14% as on Mar’20. NPAs and downgraded
investment as % of total investments stood at 1.2% & 2.4% respectively. Further, provision for NPAs stood at ~90%. Given that it has huge PAR AUM (91% of total AUM),
LIC need not linger on provisions. Any impact from bad assets hits policyholders instead of shareholders (due to Par-heavy mix) and thus making its BS more immune than RESEARCH ANALYST
perceived. LIC’s revisionary bonus rate on Par policies is stable since FY13, indicating its ability to manage investments without impacting policyholders returns.
SANKETH GODHA
VNB margins to be significantly lower than listed Pvt peers due to higher surplus sharing with Par policyholders: Given LIC shares more surplus than private insurers (LIC
95% vs. Private 90%), we believe the VNB (value of new business) margin made by LIC on Par business shall be significantly lower than Pvt players. With lower sanketh@sparkcapital.in
contribution of individual non-par savings business (including protection business), we believe LIC’s VNB margins shall be at 10-11% of APE. +91 22 6176 6821
FY20 Embedded value of Rs 3.2 trillion with ROEVs of ~10%: Given ASM is funding LIC’s business (which is at Rs. 1.5tln vs. reported shareholder equity of meagre Rs. ARJUN N
7.4bn), we believe it is equivalent to adjusted net worth reported by private life insurers. VIF of LIC shall be lower at ~5% of it AUM (9-11% of AUM is VIF for Pvt. Insurers) arjun@sparkcapital.in
due to their higher surplus sharing in Par business. Factoring in this, we estimate FY20 EV of LIC to be ~Rs.3.2trillion in FY20 with an ROEVs of ~10%. For its ROEVs and +91 44 4344 0081
growth, it can be fairly valued at 1-1.2x EV which translate into to market cap of Rs 3.8-4.5tln.
find SPARK RESEARCH on Bloomberg [RESP SPAK <go>] | FACTSET | REFINITIV EIKON * Based on 20% holdco. discount to CIFC Page 2
LIC- Market share & Product Mix
Page 3
Life Insurance Corporation
#1. LIC: Despite its size, it broadly maintained growth momentum with the private industry since FY15
Despite lower ticket size; LIC growth was steady largely in-line with peers since product regulation flux settled in FY15
APE & Product mix SBILIFE IPRU HDFCLIFE Max BALIC LIC What is better
APE CAGR FY16-20 (%) 21% 9% 19% 18% 24% 12% Higher
ATS CAGR FY16-20 (%) 16% 1% 23% 9% 22% 8% Higher
No of policies CAGR FY16-20 (%) 5% 7% -6% 7% 5% 2% Higher
Individual APE % of total APE (%) 92% 92% 83% 94% 84% 71% Higher
ULIP % of Total Individual APE (%) 76% 70% 28% 40% 51% 0% Lower
Protection % of Total APE (%) 9% 15% 17% 14% 8% NA Higher
Group Protect % of Total Protection (%) 47% 31% 63% 41% 100% NA Lower
Group Funds % of total APE (%) 4% 3% 6% 0% 8% 29% Lower
Average ticket size (Rs '000) 64 89 68 65 62 14 Lower
No of Reds (no) 2 4 3 0 2 4 Lower
Source: Company, Spark Capital
Since FY16, LIC APE CAGR at 12% was better than a few private insurers LIC gains market share when ULIP demand is weak
Page 4
Life Insurance Corporation
#2. LIC: With increase in the contribution of group business, total premium growth moderated; enjoy 66% market share in total premium
Total Premium Market share is higher than new business; however, it is declining gradually
LIC Pvt
Page 5
Life Insurance Corporation
#3. LIC: Par, group business and lower ticket size does not bode well for profitability
With no focus on ULIPs, LIC’s average ticket size remained broadly stable. LIC’s market share in no. of individual policies is better and remained stable (sell 3x no. of individual
policies vs. private insurers)
Avg APE per policy (Rs'000) Individual No of policies (mn) Market share - No of individual policies
70 25.0 21.9 100%
60 20.5 21.3 21.4
55 20.1 20.1
60 52 51 20.0 80%
50 45
37 64%
40 35 15.0 60% 78% 77% 76% 76% 75% 76%
30 23 10.0
6.3 6.9 7.2 7.0 40%
14 5.7 6.2
20 12 13 14
10 10
5.0 20% 36%
10 3.5 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.1 22% 23% 24% 24% 25% 24%
0 0.0 0%
FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 4M21 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 4M21
Contribution from Group business, which has lower profitability than individual
PAR heavy company; individual Non-Par is largely annuity business
business has significantly increased
LIC - APE Mix (Individual vs. Group) LIC - APE Mix (%)
100% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1%
4% 4% 6% 7% 100%
11% 11% 11% 12% 14% 18% 22% 21%
15% 18% 1% 1% 23% 23%
90% 23% 24% 23% 24% 80% 1%
29% 2% 5% 5% 4%
80% 60%
96% 96% 94% 93%
70% 89% 89% 89% 40% 87% 85% 81%
85% 82% 76% 72% 73% 73%
77% 76% 77% 76%
60% 71% 20%
50% 0%
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
Page 6
Life Insurance Corporation
#4. LIC: Protection contribution is lower as agents don’t prefer selling low ATS policies; launch of affordable online plan can drive growth
LIC launched cheaper online term plan which is priced better than larger Pvt life insurer. Given implied sovereign guarantee it enjoys, protection growth should pick up
Source: Policy bazaar, Company, Spark Capital * Premium per policy is for Sum assured of Rs 10mn for a non-smoker at an entry age of 30 yrs and with a premium paying term of 30yrs. #Above prices include GST
Page 7
Life Insurance Corporation
#5. LIC: Ticket size of LIC indicates than large part of their customers bought life insurers products for 80C benefits
More than 50% of premium is from low ticket size policies which could be at risk if
While in no of policy terms, the contribution is much higher at 85%
80C is removed
FY20 - Composition of Individual Regular premium Ticket size (Rs.mn) FY20 - Composition of Individual Regular premium Ticket size (No. of policies)
100% 100% 1%
2%
10% 16% 11% 9% 10% 9%
13%
10% 12% 15% 16% 11%
80% 42% 80% 13%
45% 45% 44%
63% 29%
60% 60% 36%
31% 41% 41% 42%
18% 21% 24% 19%
40% 40% 85%
15% 51%
20% 29% 26% 28% 27% 44%
20% 39% 36% 35%
17% 32%
4% 8% 7% 6% 11%
0% 0%
IPRU SBILIFE HDFCLIFE MAXF BALIC LIC IPRU SBILIFE HDFCLIFE MAXF BALIC LIC
<25,000 25,000-75,000 75,000-1,25,000 >1,25,000 <25,000 25,000-75,000 75,000-1,25,000 >1,25,000
Compared to other private players, LIC has a relatively diversified geographical presence
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Maha WB UP TN Gujarat Karnataka Delhi Kerala Teleng AP Others
Page 8
LIC- Distribution & Opex
Page 9
Life Insurance Corporation
#1. LIC: Largely agency-driven business model; has the most productive agents in the country
Despite having strong bancassurance relationships; agency force continue to remain the dominant channel for LIC’s individual business
LIC has tie-up with 14 large and medium Public and Private Banks (Co-operative
Agency is 95% of individual business
banks not included)
Page 10
Life Insurance Corporation
#2. LIC: Agent’s productivity is more than 3x of private life insurance industry
LIC has more no. of agents vs. entire Pvt. insurers Productivity of the agents (in Rs) is more than 3x of private insurers
No. of individual agents (mn) Agent productivity -LIC vs. Pvt (Rs '000)
1.4 1.2
1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.2 500 5.0
1.1
1.2 1.1 1.0 1.1
0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 4.1 4.2
1.0 0.9 400 4.0 4.0
3.6 3.4
0.8 3.1 3.3
300 3.0
0.6
200 2.0
0.4
0.2 100 1.0
328 79 336 79 267 85 284 87 399 101 434 119 420 122
0.0 0 0.0
FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
LIC Pvt
LIC Pvt x of private
Productivity of the agents (no. of policies) is more than 9x of private insurers No. of branches of LIC is more than entire pvt insurers
Page 11
Life Insurance Corporation
#3. LIC: Operating metrics, such as cost and persistency, weaker than larger Pvt. insurers
Key operating metrics such as opex and persistency weaker than Pvt. peers
Key operating metrics SBILIFE IPRU HDFCLIFE Max BALIC LIC What is better
Opex Ratio (ex- commissions) (%) 5.9% 8.5% 13.0% 14.5% 18.1% 9.1% Lower
Par - Opex Ratio (%) 6.9% 8.3% 16.3% 15.3% 18.4% 12.2% Lower
13-month persistency (%) 86.1% 85.3% 90.1% 83.0% 79.2% 72.2% Higher
Single premium % of Individual New business 14.6% 17.4% 33.4% 22.8% 4.0% 42.9% Lower
Linked Surrenders % of Avg AUM (%) 3.5% 14.0% 14.6% 12.3% 11.0% 5.0% Lower
Avg Policy Tenure (no of years) 12.0 14.0 19.6 25.0 NA NA Higher
Avg age of customer (no of years) 40.0 42.0 37.2 36.0 NA NA Lower
(Non-Par+SH) AUM % of Total non-linked AUM (%) 62% 63% 57% 23% 53% 7% Lower
Debt % of ULIP AUM (%) 72% 52% 54% 63% 40% 76% Higher
No of Reds (no) 3 5 3 2 4 2 Lower
13-month persistency is weak (which we believe is due to lower ATS); but other
.. However, conservation ratio of LIC is better than private insurers
cohorts largely on par/better than private insurers
80% 74%76%77%72% Premium Persistency Conservation Ratio - LIC vs. Pvt (%)
71%
66%68% 67% 68%
63%65%63% 66% 63%
62% 60%58% 100% 91% 91% 92%
58%59% 90% 91% 91%
60% 54%
90% 82%
40% 80%
81% 83%
70% 78% 77% 78%
20%
60% 69%
64%
0% 50%
13 month 25 month 37 month 49 months 61 month FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
Page 12
Life Insurance Corporation
20%
0%
SBILIFE IPRU HDFCLIFE MAX BALIC LIC
Opex ratio better than private insurers; with focus on traditional products, LIC’s commission ratio is higher than pvt insurers
Opex (ex-commission) Ratio (%) First Year Commission Ratio (%) Total Commission Ratio (%)
25% 35% 29.3% 8%
18.9% 19.1% 26.5% 27.2% 27.2% 27.0% 28.1% 7.1% 7.1%
30% 25.4%
20% 16.4% 16.0% 7% 6.3%
14.6% 25% 5.8%
13.3% 12.9% 5.5% 5.7% 5.7%
15% 20% 6%
10% 15%
5% 5.7%
10% 15.6% 14.6% 5.3%
5% 9.3% 9.6% 9.5% 12.6% 13.6% 13.9% 4.9% 5.0% 4.9%
8.0% 8.6% 8.5% 8.6% 12.2% 11.6% 4% 4.7% 4.6%
5%
0% 0% 3%
FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
Page 13
LIC- AUM & Solvency
Page 14
Life Insurance Corporation
#1. LIC: Enjoys ~78% of industry’s AUM with limited exposure to ULIPs; PAR is 91% of total AUM, thus making immune to any defaults
LIC has Rs. 28tln Assets Under Management LIC has 80% market share of industry’s AUM
Industry AUM - Pvt vs. LIC (Rs trillion) Industry AUM Mix (%)
40 35 100%
32 20% 20% 21% 20% 20% 21% 22%
29 80%
30 25 8
22 7
20 6 60%
17 5
20 5
4 40% 80% 80% 79% 80% 80% 79%
3 78%
25 28
10 20 23
16 18 20%
14
0 0%
FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
LIC’s AUM Mix – Product-Wise PAR is 91% of total AUM, thus making immune to any defaults
20% 80%
FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
Life Pension, annuity & group ULIPs Par Non-Par ULIPs Shareholders
Page 15
Life Insurance Corporation
#2. LIC: ~14% of non-linked AUM is corporate bonds (largely in Par) and hence limited risk to shareholders
~14% of non-linked AUM is corporate bonds (largely in Par) and hence limited risk
With most of the ULIPs running off, the debt contribution is higher for LIC
to shareholders of LIC
FY20 - Non-ULIP AUM Mix (%) FY20 - ULIP AUM Mix (%)
Real Estate, 1%
MFs, 3%
Govt bonds, 73% MFs, 0%
Govt bonds, 67% Real Estate, 0%
Infra, Housing & Infra, Housing &
Social, 9% Social, 10%
With G-sec and equity heavy portfolio (Non-linked), NPA & Downgraded book is 1.2% and 2.4% of total investments respectively; Due to aggressive provisions, Net NPA is just
2.2% of the available solvency margin (%)
Exposure to NPA & Downgraded Investments (%) FY20 - NPA PCR (%) Net NPA % of ASM (%)
4.0% 3.7% 92% 91% 2.5%
91% 91%
3.5% 91% 0.0%
3.0% 2.0%
2.4% 90% 0.5%
2.5% 2.0% 89% 1.5%
2.0%
1.3% 1.4% 88%
1.5% 1.0% 1.2% 87% 2.2%
87% 1.0%
1.0% 0.7% 1.6%
0.5% 86%
0.5%
0.0% 85%
Life fund Pension ULIP Total 84% 0.0%
NPA Downgraded Life Pension ULIP Total Life Pension ULIP Total
Source: Company, Spark Capital.
Page 16
Life Insurance Corporation
#1. LIC: Sitting on decent gains on investment book; solvency is funded by policyholder (Par surplus is calculated post solvency cost)
With long dated investment & equity exposure, LIC MV of investment is 10-12%
With steady premium growth, there has been net addition to AUM
better than reported book value
MTM gain on investments Net Addition to opening AUM (ex- MTM gains)
16% 60% 54%
14%
14% 12% 50%
36%
40%
12%
10% 9% 30%
10% 8% 8% 16%
20%
8% 10% 2% 1% 5% 3% 2%
1% 1%
5% 5%
6% 0%
-10%
4%
-20% -13% -14%
2% -16%
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
0%
FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 PAR Non-Par ULIP Total
Solvency policyholder funded - Par surplus is calculated post solvency cost Available solvency margin is significantly higher than reported shareholders equity
1,145
1,284
1,418
1,506
1,008
1,145
1,284
1,418
1,506
400 135% 400
50x
698
791
896
617
400
698
453
791
513
896
579
652
727
811
886
974
7.4
6.8
6.5
5.8
6.1
5.4
5.6
5.2
130%
0 125% 0 0x
FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY19
ASM (Rs bn) RSM (Rs bn) Solvency margin ratio (%) ASM Shareholders equity ASM / Shareholders equity (x)
Page 17
LIC- Embedded Value & Valuation
Page 18
Life Insurance Corporation
As per our estimates, LIC would be have EV of Rs 3.8 trillion as on Mar’22 generating an ROEV of ~10%
ROEVs 11.2% 15.8% 11.7% 9.4% 9.9% 9.7% 9.9% Unlike private insurers, LIC has
a single controlled fund for all
product and hence it deducts
EV Mix FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21E FY22E cost of capital to maintain
ANW 1,007,720 1,145,345 1,284,160 1,417,628 1,505,587 1,589,333 1,708,533 solvency at 150% from the
VIF 1,030,716 1,215,971 1,353,509 1,467,095 1,665,015 1,889,143 2,112,843 fund before distributing
EV 2,038,436 2,361,316 2,637,669 2,884,723 3,170,602 3,478,475 3,821,376 surplus to the Par business
policyholders
EV Mix (%) FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21E FY22E Given this, we have assumed
ANW 49% 49% 49% 49% 47% 46% 45% ASM of the business to be
equivalent to Adjusted Net
VIF 51% 51% 51% 51% 53% 54% 55%
worth component of EV
EV 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Key Assumptions (%) FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21E FY22E
AUM 20,614,312 24,319,426 27,070,188 29,341,900 30,273,007 31,786,657 34,170,657
AUM growth 10% 18% 11% 8.4% 3.2% 5.0% 7.5%
VIF % of AUM 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.5% 5.9% 6.2%
VIF % of Total Premium 38.5% 40.5% 42.5% 43.5% 43.7% 46.2% 46.9%
ASM or ANW % of AUM 4.9% 4.7% 4.7% 4.8% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0%
Source: Company, Spark Capital
LIC for Par business retain 5% of surplus for shareholders vs. 10% by private insurers; hence VIF % of AUM assumed is lower for LIC vs. Private
Page 19
Life Insurance Corporation
#2. LIC: With higher surplus sharing in Par and lower protection, we expect VNB margin of LIC to be ~10-11%
APE growth & VNB margin Assumptions
Key Assumptions FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21E FY22E
APE (Rs mn) 300,478 349,771 387,830 408,168 441,321 446,946 504,111
APE Growth (%) 16.1% 16.4% 10.9% 5.2% 8.1% 1.3% 12.8%
Page 20
Life Insurance Corporation
#3. LIC: For its ROEVs and growth, it can be fairly valued at 1-1.2x EV which translate into to market cap of Rs 3.8-4.5tln
At 1.2x P/EV implied NBx at 13.4x and P/EVOP of 15.7x is fair compared Pvt Life insurer
Indian private life insurers trade at one of the highest M.cap to Assets ratio compared to global peers
Mkt Cap
505 460 335 246 740 276 427 454 127 539 284 7 21 22 18
/AUM (USD50%
bn)
Mcap/Total Assets 41% Mcap/Total Assets
40% 90%
30% 27%
51%
18% 42%
20% 14%
28%
9%
10% 3% 4% 5% 4%
3% 2%
0%
MAXF
IPRU
HDFC Life
SBI Life
L&G
Principal
Prudential
New China
China Life
Samsung
LIC
Lincoln
Metlife
Avivia
AIA
Mcap/Total Assets Mcap/Total Assets
Page 21
Life Insurance Corporation
Company EV p/s (Rs) EVE P/s (Rs) Operating EV P/s (Rs) NBV p/S
FY19 FY20E FY21E FY22E FY19 FY20E FY21E FY22E FY19 FY20E FY21E FY22E FY19 FY20E FY21E FY22E
IPRU 150.6 160.4 191.6 216.8 25.6 12.6 31.9 27.5 26.5 22.9 24.1 27.5 9.3 11.2 10.3 11.6
SBILIFE 224.0 262.7 315.0 362.1 35.7 38.7 54.6 49.7 33.2 45.8 42.6 49.7 17.2 20.1 19.6 23.0
HDFCLIFE 90.7 102.3 123.8 142.3 17.0 11.5 23.2 20.3 15.2 16.4 17.4 20.3 7.6 9.5 8.5 9.8
MAXF 181.4 202.5 232.3 265.3 41.2 30.4 35.9 38.6 38.5 36.8 31.6 38.6 16.7 18.2 16.4 19.9
Company EV p/s growth (%) EVE P/s growth (%) Operating EV P/s growth (%) NB p/s growth (%)
FY19 FY20E FY21E FY22E FY19 FY20E FY21E FY22E FY19 FY20E FY21E FY22E FY19 FY20E FY21E FY22E
IPRU 15.1% 6.5% 19.4% 13.2% -3.0% -50.7% 153.1% -13.9% 3.3% -13.5% 5.2% 14.3% 3.3% 20.7% -7.9% 13.1%
SBILIFE 17.5% 17.3% 19.9% 14.9% 28.9% 8.3% 41.2% -9.1% 12.3% 37.8% -7.1% 16.7% 23.7% 16.9% -2.3% 16.9%
HDFCLIFE 20.0% 12.8% 21.0% 14.9% 16.2% -32.3% 101.6% -12.5% 14.0% 8.2% 5.5% 16.8% 19.8% 24.6% -10.5% 15.1%
MAXF 17.8% 11.6% 14.7% 14.2% 53.1% -26.3% 18.2% 7.6% 38.2% -4.5% -14.0% 22.1% 24.1% 9.0% -9.8% 21.3%
Page 22
LIC- Financial Summary
Page 23
Life Insurance Corporation
Key Operational metrics FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
Commission/ Total Premium (%) 7.0% 6.3% 5.8% 5.5% 5.7% 5.9% 5.5%
Opex (ex-commissions) / TWP (%) 8.6% 9.3% 8.5% 9.6% 9.5% 8.4% 9.1%
Conservation Ratio (%) 90% 91% 91% 91% 91% 92% 89%
Investment yield - Shareholders (%) 7.0% 6.4% 6.2% 8.9% 6.6% 7.1% 4.5%
Product mix - APE (%) FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
Linked 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% NA
Par 75.2% 72.4% 67.5% 64.2% 67.5% 65.2% NA
Non Par 24.8% 27.6% 32.5% 35.7% 32.3% 34.7% NA
Page 24
Life Insurance Corporation
Embedded value (Rs mn) FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
Adjusted networth 791,066 896,094 1,007,720 1,145,345 1,284,160 1,417,628 1,505,587
Value of in force 792,822 936,967 1,030,716 1,215,971 1,353,509 1,467,095 1,665,015
Embedded value 1,583,888 1,833,061 2,038,436 2,361,316 2,637,669 2,884,723 3,170,602
- Growth 13% 16% 11% 16% 12% 9% 10%
Value of New Business (VNB) 32,664 24,512 29,868 37,394 41,197 43,130 46,941
- Growth -25% 22% 25% 10% 5% 9%
VNB Margin 9.1% 9.5% 9.9% 10.7% 10.6% 10.6% 10.6%
APE 358,054 258,877 300,478 349,771 387,830 408,168 441,321
- Growth -28% 16% 16% 11% 5% 8%
Page 25
Life Insurance Corporation
BUY Stock expected to provide positive returns of >15% over a 1-year horizon REDUCE Stock expected to provide returns of <5% – -10% over a 1-year horizon
Absolute Rating
Interpretation
ADD Stock expected to provide positive returns of >5% – <15% over a 1-year horizon SELL Stock expected to fall >10% over a 1-year horizon
Spark Disclaimer
Spark Capital Advisors (India) Private Limited (Spark Capital) and its affiliates are engaged in investment banking, investment advisory and institutional equities. Spark Capital is registered with SEBI as a Stock Broker, corporate member on the
Bombay Stock Exchange and National Stock Exchange and Category I Merchant Banker. We hereby declare that our activities were neither suspended nor we have defaulted with any stock exchange authority with whom we are registered in
the last five years. We have not been debarred from doing business by any Stock Exchange/SEBI or any other authorities, nor has our certificate of registration been cancelled by SEBI at any point of time.
Spark Capital has two wholly owned subsidiaries (1) Spark Family Office and Investment Advisors (India) Private Limited which is engaged in the services of providing investment advisory services and is registered with SEBI as Investment
Advisor and (2) Spark Alternative Asset Advisors India Private Limited engaged in the business of Category II Alternate Investment Fund. Spark Capital have two more subsidiaries (1) Spark Fund Managers Private Limited which is engaged in
the business of Portfolio Management Services and is registered with SEBI (2) Spark Fund Advisors LLP registered with SEBI as Category III Alternate Investment Fund which was originally an associate entity and became subsidiary with effect
from August 01, 2018. Spark Capital also has an associate company Spark Infra Advisors (India) Private Limited which is engaged in the business of providing infrastructure advisory services.
Each recipient of this document should make such investigations as it deems necessary to arrive at an independent evaluation of an investment in the securities of companies referred to in this document (including the merits and risks
involved), and should consult its own advisors to determine the merits and risks of such an investment. This document is being supplied to you solely for your information and may not be reproduced, redistributed or passed on, directly or
indirectly, to any other person or published, copied, in whole or in part, for any purpose. This report is not directed or intended for distribution to or use by any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state,
country or other jurisdiction, where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law, regulation or which would subject Spark Capital and/or its affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement within such
jurisdiction. The securities described herein may or may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to a certain category of investors. Persons in whose possession this document may come are required to inform themselves of and to
observe such applicable restrictions. This material should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal.
Spark Capital makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the information and opinions contained in this document. Spark Capital , its affiliates, and the employees of Spark Capital
and its affiliates may, from time to time, effect or have effected an own account transaction in, or deal as principal or agent in or for the securities mentioned in this document. They may perform or seek to perform investment banking or
other services for, or solicit investment banking or other business from, any company referred to in this report.
This report has been prepared on the basis of information, which is already available in publicly accessible media or developed through an independent analysis by Spark Capital. While we would endeavour to update the information herein
on a reasonable basis, Spark Capital and its affiliates are under no obligation to update the information. Also, there may be regulatory, compliance or other reasons that prevent Spark Capital and its affiliates from doing so. Neither Spark
Capital nor its affiliates or their respective directors, employees, agents or representatives shall be responsible or liable in any manner, directly or indirectly, for views or opinions expressed in this report or the contents or any errors or
discrepancies herein or for any decisions or actions taken in reliance on the report or the inability to use or access our service in this report or for any loss or damages whether direct or indirect, incidental, special or consequential including
without limitation loss of revenue or profits that may arise from or in connection with the use of or reliance on this report.
Spark Capital and/or its affiliates and/or employees may have interests/positions, financial or otherwise in the securities mentioned in this report. To enhance transparency, Spark Capital has incorporated a disclosure of interest statement in
this document. This should however not be treated as endorsement of views expressed in this report:
Details of Financial Interest of Research Entity [Spark Capital Advisors (India) Private Limited] and its Associates No
Details of Financial Interest of covering analyst/ and his relatives No
Disclosure of interest statement
Page 26
Life Insurance Corporation
Page 27