Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Modassar Warsi
Abstract:
In this essay I would like to present history as has been perceived by Amitav Ghosh in
The Shadow Lines. He rejects the generally accepted definition of history; considering it to be
authentic facts and authoritative chronology. Ghosh challenges it by declaring such a conception
to be a Western notion. He asserts that though it is true that history is written by victors, it might
not be true for it could as biased as a subjective human being is capable of. In this essay, I would
stress upon various sections in the novel where the dividing lines drawn between the real facts
and unreal fiction fades into a shadow with the help of narrative technique used by the author.
The whole endeavor of the narrator during the events of the novel to re-invent the
forgotten history shows what happens generally. It has now become an accepted norm that the
minor events and the unwanted episodes have to make way for the interesting rumours and
scandalous happenings. Ghosh has tried to re-write the history displaying the concealed elements
assigning the different voices to diverse characters while narrating a story. Thus, this essay will
History has never been such as it emerged in the twentieth century. With the advent of
post colonialism the way history was perceived and how it was later seen changed drastically,
having nothing in common. History has been considered synonymous to past in earlier times;
that is it was thought to be authentic and remained unchallenged. No one questioned the validity
of the chronicles and the archives that formed the foundation of this branch of study. This trend
stopped but with the massive changes brought in by the Marxist approach that became prevalent.
History was objective no more and therefore it had to prove itself to be true. In the old times,
history was never judged to be a form of literature but it was thought to be carrying greater
importance and was never critiqued. However, it was realized that after all history is written by
human being and no eternal creature. This led to the inference that the historiographers are but a
bunch of people with their own subjectivities, their choices and their favorites. The history
writing is then a complex combination of selection; rejection and addition. So, when a victor
writes history, it is not an absolute replica of what happened but only one version of the same.
The voices that are loud are made to reverberate in the world whereas the feeble ones and
whispers are silenced. The world never gets to know about them.
This newly, revised version of history that has taken a bold step to challenge the so called
mainstream history is what is depicted in Amitav Ghosh’s famous work The Shadow Lines. The
author has cleverly presented his point of view that though every society has its own history; the
individual (who is the smallest building block of this society) has his own share to contribute
towards the greater history. Without him it is obvious that there remains a gap and the picture
won’t surface completely with the blank spaces left by individuals. Helpless as for filling these
fissures one has to rely upon the sources that are not at all factual. The fictional mediums of
imagination, dreams and a much unreliable memory have to be made use of to complete the
Warsi | 3
vacancies. It is interesting to note how through his narration Ghosh shows that at times these
sources could be more authentic. He speaks through one of his characters that everybody lives in
a story and stories are bound to be oscillating between realities and untruth. The character of
Tridib further states: “If you believe anything people tell you, you deserve to be told anything at
all….” This is what the author speaks to his reader to not accept as true whatever is told to them,
When a story is told or written, the most important role, after the plot, is played by the
narrator. It is through narrator’s eye and through his perspective that we visualize the whole
story. The change in perception changes the meaning. This story has been told by a small boy
who grows up to find himself bound by the draconian clutches of history. But for Tridib’s vision,
he would have been like any other commoner, accepting the history in its crude form. Narrator’s
mentor, Tridib has been behind his bend of mind towards “imagination with precision”. In the
whole course of the novel, he is drenched in memories for his narration is overflowing with
recollections, dates, anecdotes and an unanswered or a rather rhetorical, often repeated question:
“Do you remember?” The narrator speaks about his experience with truth and facts very early in
life. Although he tried to justify what he said regarding the unknown truth about his uncle, Tridib
yet it was the story fabricated by his uncle that the people at the corner of the Gole Park tend to
believe.
The narrator learnt from his mentor that “a place does not merely exist. That it has to be
invented in one’s imagination”. This was how he has been able to journey through London
before he even actually stepped out of Calcutta. He is even enticed to take up Indian History as
his subject in college. Tha’amma thought nostalgia to be weakness but the narrator was nostalgic
in a different way where it rather became his strength. He attempted to discover the presence of
Warsi | 4
past in the present. That was how Victor Gollancz’s publishing house co-existed with the office
that stood at the same spot after about forty years. Therefore, “past seemed concurrent with its
present” for him. He lies between other two characters in the novel. Ila believed in all that was
current while his grandmother in her later age did not pay any heed to what was present. The
narrator tries to give voice to what has been silenced and remained unheard with such insight
Tridib has told the narrator, the way the faculty of imagination worked. He highlighted in
the novel that even an imagination presented in an accurate manner would pass for a fact. It is
what made his speech believable and wholeheartedly acceptable by the narrator in his life.
Imagination being bound by no boundary allowed the speaker a greater degree of possibilities.
Reality and Recollection get to fight it out whilst the narrator roams around in England. The
former is trivial for him compared to his memory of the description that Tridib has given him of
the same place. Tridib bestowed his qualities of story-telling to his nephew who used to make
sundry stories on one of his favorite photographs. The stories tend to end on how people in the
photograph were posing. So, could one still believe a photograph to be an authentic source for
histriography?
The technique of narration used by Ghosh is not at all simplistic for the narrator is not the
only narrator in the novel. There are many minor narrators who tell a small section of the story. It
is owing to this that one finds the narratology to be very complex; intertwining into each other.
Warsi | 5
This makes it difficult for the reader who is never prepare to be instantaneously transferred to
different places and different times, finding himself confused between reality and dream, dream
and imagination, and imagination and memory. There are lots of people through which the
information reaching the reader gets filtered through. The reader is then unable to decide whether
to believe what is said for there is no surety of its authenticity but he is also void of any reasons
The help that various characters in the novel render towards the narrator is very important
for he is not at all omniscient and is ignorant of many facts. Thus, the others lend their stories to
him so that he could integrate them into his narratology and complete the empty spaces that were
left by his unknowingness. He gave voice to those silent fables. Ila acted like a connecting link
between the families of Price in England and Mayadebi’s in India. She defies those customs that
has long been considered as the core of history by going against them. In her stories she placed
herself as different characters and tried to live her dream life through it by modifying the
happenings. The story that she tells while playing the game of House has Magda playing her role
while Nick Price saving him whereas that was not what happened in reality. Robi, on the other
hand, comes up with his nightmare that has haunted him ever since Tridib’s demise. This dream
could but be taken for a genuine account of the accident that took away his brother’s life. Later,
May confirmed to the same. Narrator’s grandmother has different stories to tell. On one hand,
she has her childhood recollection of the “upside down house” and the different stories she made
on them. It still holds importance for Mayadebi and her when they get a chance to enter that
house. She rejects nationality as a true source of history in how she acts on the whole trip to her
The novel primarily tries to re-invent the riots that happened in Calcutta. Ila has already
said that riots are a local thing and the same transpired in a discussion that took after a
conference on the Indo-China War at Teen Murti Library. The opinion about the same event is
different for some people who have witnessed such events. The narrator and Tha’amma could
never agree to the same outlook as Ila and narrator’s friends. Riots are “extraordinary history”
for them. The others are just ignorant about these events that otherwise would certainly have
taken more life than even the War of 1961. Even the section on War in the library bypassed such
episodes of riots suggesting their insignificance and actually contributing towards the silencing
of this portion of life. The people and heroes of such events are soon forgotten, “faded(ing) away
from the pages of the newspapers, disappearing from the collective imagination of ‘responsible
opinion’, vanished, without leaving a trace in the histories and bookshelves” (230). The narrator
reveals his experience of struggle in highlighting the concealed facet of the events of the riots of
1964 that nevertheless it is only a RE-presentation. This account could also be taken for his
with silence. It is a struggle I am destined to lose- have already lost- for even after
all these years, I do not know where within me, in which corner of my world, this
silence lies… it is simply a gap, a hole, an emptiness in which there are no words.
(218)
The realization of the narrator after fifteen years of the riots was enough to make him
think. Although there has been a border between two places- Calcutta and Khulna- they both
were hit by riots at the same time. This helped him to understand the bond shared by human
being, their history that is united into one irrespective of the artificial borders drawn by humans.
Warsi | 7
The shadow lines drawn between two nations could not divide people for “how can anyone
divide a memory?” Even when the language, culture and custom of different nations differ, there
are yet times when two appear like images of each other and at times the line dissolves to give a
taste of prehistoric times when history did not corrupted human bond. History dominates today
only because it has been taken as a criterion to determine one’s identity. The section where the
narrator elaborates upon his experiments with the Bartholomew’s Atlas should be read to cure
the disease of intense Nationalism. Ghosh tries to change it with a wider idea of Humanity.
Today, one might not be aware of the actions taking place in near vicinity only because there is
some line drawn between such two places. What narrator believes is that these happenings, even
with all the discordance between, are related and unites the divided section into one,
Thus, Ghosh has tried in his novel, by his narratology to unite those which are actually
one. The history that generally gets to the common masses is anything but bias with a lot of gaps
that nobody cares to fill. One version of history gets a validity as an absolute one and so
convincingly it is done that people tend even to overlook the truth, as happened to the narrator as
a child also. The author uses his characters with their stories as pieces of a jigsaw puzzle which
he made his narrator to complete. Even when the picture is complete there are yet gaps where the
parts were connected. Imaginations, memories and dreams are not such a fictional source as
could be deciphered by Ghosh’s narratology. Therefore, one must need to differentiate between
what is true and what is partially true and endeavor to reach the former with whatever resources
one could.