Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Music 325
28 July 2020
The clip I’ve chosen is from a silent film titled How a French Nobleman Got a Wife
Through the New York Herald Personal Columns. The film entails a French nobleman placing an
ad in the local newspaper for a wealthy woman to become his wife. His ad is answered by
several women who proceed to chase him all over the place. The portion of the film I’ve cut for
my project includes the French nobleman greeting several of the women, and then running away
from them.
The chase sequence of the film that I’ve selected for this clip is an extended montage of
the man being followed by several women across multiple types of terrain: concrete, grass, sand,
and shrubbery. The mise-en-scene for each shot of the chase is the same, just a man being chased
by a horde of women from the distance to up front in an innocuous setting. The direction of
chase is always from the top of the screen to the bottom, so when placed in order, a sense of
continuity is maintained through the different shots. The music I’ve chosen to play during this
specific chase sequence is Rimsky Korsakov’s Flight of the Bumblebee. The repeating chromatic
melody of this piece makes this an empathetic, non-diegetic use of music. The music clearly
depicts a nervous franticness, matching that of the French nobleman on screen. As it works with
the linear chase sequence, though we never see how the characters move from terrain to terrain,
the repetitive, uninterrupted style of the music indicates that the different shots are of the same
event. Prior to the chase sequence, there is a brief scene of the man shaking hands with all of the
women until they become too numerous. During this, you can hear the women’s excited
clamoring and their exchange of greetings, clearly an on screen, diegetic sound. The moment we
cut to the chase, however, we no longer hear the sound of the women’s voices, just the music
There are a few listening modes employed by audience members in the sound and music
of this clip. First there is semantic listening in the initial conversations between the Frenchman
and the women he greets. On top of that there is the background clamour that the viewer can try
to listen to, but will ultimately only be able to distinguish and understand certain words out of
context. Then there is causal listening, in the moments where we hear the Frenchman huffing and
running. Based on what visuals occur when those sounds happen, we as an audience can deduce
that the source of the sound is from what happened on screen. This would be audiovisual
manipulation of the viewer, because the sounds played didn’t actually come from the instance
depicted on screen. There is also the listening done when hearing the music, which doesn’t
appear to fit causal, semantic, or reduced listening, as the audience is not trying to find the cause,
linguistically interpret, or identify traits of the sound without regard to meaning. Thus, some of
the sounds and music of my clip fit the categories of sound listening described by Schaeffer, but
some don’t.
As far as classical aesthetics go, Aristotle believed that a good plot was tightly
constructed, propulsive, and strictly causal; art was a depiction of what life should be, and thus,
always made logical sense. A story was a chain of events, each chain necessary for the next. A
missing chain link meant that the story would fall apart. I believe that this theory is refuted in my
clip, particularly when it comes to the chase sequence. The power of montage and the consistent,
linear direction along with the audiovisual manipulation tells the viewer that the chase through
the concrete, grass, sand, and shrubbery are all of the same event. However, they are not
logically reliant on each other. If you took one of the shots out, the same idea of the French
nobleman being chased is still portrayed without loss. There is no rhyme or reason for the change
in scenery, and therefore they, along with the particular sounds corresponding with each scenery,
are not necessary for understanding. However, Aristotle’s idea is necessary for the beginning of
the clip. Without the information that the French nobleman had greeted so many women who
responded to his ad, the progression between that scene and the chase sequence wouldn’t make
sense. This also applies overall to the way I cut the scene out of the film. The dialogue inserted
into the film only includes basic greetings with no regard to reason, so from that alone, it’s not
possible to deduce why the women are meeting the French nobleman. In the original film, there
is a scene of the French nobleman actually putting the ad in the newspaper. Without that
information, visually or auditorily, there’s no explanation for why the French nobleman was
surrounded by women in the first place. From Plato’s point of view, all art is an imperfect
depiction of an already imperfect world. Plato would believe that this clip from the film was
purely for self gratification with ignorance towards the truth. In this case, the reality is perhaps
that no woman would actually want to marry the French nobleman, and that the film is a way to
imagine the possibilities that that weren’t true. A problem with lack of desirable women becomes
one of too many. In a perfect world where it would be easy to find the right spouse on the first
Herald Personal Column uses montage and mise-en-scene to depict its story, along with both
diegetic and nondiegetic empathetic music. The viewer must use multiple listening modes when
paying attention to various sounds and music, though not all of the listening types fit easily into
Schaeffer’s categories. Lastly, the montage of the chase scene refutes Aristotle’s theory that if
you take out a part of the story, it won’t make sense, and plausibly fits with Plato’s theory of
Music:
Sounds:
● 38 Greetings: https://freesound.org/people/envirOmaniac2/sounds/431176/
● Punching bag:
https://freesound.org/people/16FPanskaLipovska_Katerina/sounds/497916/