Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
As per Sheldon’s theory on certain body types ("somatotypes") that are associated with
certain personality characteristics, there are three such somatotypes: endomorphy,
mesomorphy, and ectomorphy.
Endomorphy – focused on the digestive system, particularly the stomach (endoderm);
has the tendency toward plumpness, corresponds to Viscerotonia temperament
tolerant, love of comfort and luxury, extravert.
Mesophorphy – focused on musculature and the circulatory system (mesoderm), has
the tendency towards muscularity, corresponds to the Somatotonia temperament
courageous, energetic, active, dynamic, assertive, aggressive, risk taker.
Ectomorphy focused on the nervous system and the brain (ectoderm) – the tendency
towards slightness, corresponds to Cerebrotonia temperament artistic, sensitive,
apprehensive, introvert.
On this basis, Sheldon created his very interesting Atlas of Men (Macmillan Pub Co;
1970) in which all possible body types are graded in a scale from 1 (low) to 7 (high),
based on the degree to which they matched these types; with 4 as average). Each type
is represented by a series of photos, and is given a comical or descriptive name, like
"saber tooth tiger" for extreme mesomorph, "Baluchitherium" (the largest prehistoric land
mammal) for mesomorph and endomorph, "Male Mosquito" for the extreme ectomorph,
and so on. On this scale, the extreme or pure mesomorph has a score of 1-7-1, the pure
endomorph 7-1-1, and the pure ectomorph 1-1-7. Most people of course are a
combination of types.
a. Endomorphic Body Type:
• soft body
• underdeveloped muscles
• round shaped
• over-developed digestive system
However, body types have been criticized for very weak empirical methodology and are
not generally used in psychology. The use of somatotyping (using different taxonomies)
is used more often in alternative therapies and Eastern psychology and spirituality.
Q.4 What are the different barriers to perception?
Ans.
Individuals have a tendency to use a number of shortcuts when they judge others. An
understanding of these shortcuts, really the barriers to perception can be helpful toward
recognizing when they can result in significant distortions.
1. Selective Perception
Any characteristic that makes a person, object, or event stand out will increase the
probability that it will be perceived. It is impossible for an individual to internalize and
assimilate everything that is seen .Only certain stimuli can be taken in selectively.
Selectivity works as a shortcut in judging other people by allowing us to “speed-read”
others, but, not without the risk of drawing an inaccurate picture. The tendency to see
what we want to see can make us draw unwarranted conclusions from an ambiguous
situation.
2. Halo Effect
The halo effect (Murphy & Anhalt, 1992) occurs when we draw a general impression on
the basis of a single characteristic. For example, while appraising the lecturer, students
may give prominence to a single trait, such as, enthusiasm and allow their entire
evaluation to be tainted by how they judge the instructor on that one trait which stood out
prominently in their estimation of that person. Research suggests that it is likely to be
most extreme when the traits to be perceived are ambiguous in behavioral terms, when
the traits have moral overtones, and when the perceiver is judging traits with which he or
she has had limited experience.
3. Contrast Effects
Individuals do not evaluate a person in isolation. Their reaction to one person is
influenced by other persons they have encountered recently. For example, an interview
situation in which one sees a pool of job applicants can distort perception. Distortions in
any given candidate‟s evaluation can occur as a result of his or her place in the
interview schedule.
4. Projection
This tendency to attribute one‟s own characteristics to other people – which is called
projection – can distort perceptions made about others. When managers engage in
projection, they compromise their ability to respond to individual differences. They tend
to see people as more homogeneous than they really are.
5. Stereotyping
Stereotyping–judging someone on the basis of our perception of the group to which he
or she belongs. Generalization is not without advantages (Hilton & Hippel, 1996). It is a
means of simplifying a complex world, and it permits us to maintain consistency. The
problem, of course, is when we inaccurately stereotype. In organizations, we frequently
hear comments that represent stereotypes based on gender, age, race, ethnicity, and
even weight. From a perceptual standpoint, if people expect to see these stereotypes,
that is what they will perceive, whether or not they are accurate.
6. First-impression error
Individuals place a good deal of importance on first impressions. First impressions are
lasting impressions. We tend to remember what we perceive first about a person, and
sometimes we are quite reluctant to change our initial impressions. First-impression
error means the tendency to form lasting opinions about an individual based on initial
perceptions. Primacy effects can be particularly dangerous in interviews, given that we
form first impressions quickly and that these impressions may be the basis for long-term
employment relationships.
Employment Interview
The interviewers make perceptual judgments that are often inaccurate and they rarely
agree while perceiving the candidates. Different interviewers see different things in the
same candidate and, thus, reach different conclusions about the applicant. Furthermore,
interviewers generally draw early impressions and most interviewers rarely change their
decisions after the first four or five minutes of the interview. Therefore, judgments of the
same candidate can vary widely in an interview situation..
Performance Expectations
It is seen that individuals seek to validate their perceptions of reality, even when those
perceptions are not appropriate. Self-fulfilling prophecy is a very good example of this. It
is the tendency for someone’s expectations about another to cause that person to
behave in a manner consistent with those expectations. Self fulfilling prophecy can be of
two types:
• Pygmalion Effect: A positive instance of the self-fulfilling prophecy, in which
people holding high expectations of another tend to improve that individual‟s
performance.
• Golem Effect: A negative instance of the self-fulfilling prophecy, in which people
holding low expectations of another tend to lower that individual‟s performance.
Performance Evaluation
An employee’s performance appraisal is very much dependent on the perceptual
process. Although the appraisal can be objective, many jobs are evaluated in subjective
terms. Subjective measures are, by definition, judgmental. To the degree that managers
use subjective measures in appraising employees, what the evaluator perceives to be
good or bad employee characteristics or behaviors will significantly influence the
outcome of the appraisal.
We got to be careful of these barriers while we approach not only people but also
situations.
Q.5 Mr. Batra is the General Manager, HR of a leading Automobile company. He is
having a meeting with Mr. Chandan, a leading HR consultant. Mr. Batra is concerned
about creating an environment that helps in increasing job satisfaction among
employees. Assume that you are Mr. Chandan, the HR consultant. What suggestions
will you give to Mr. Batra, for creating an environment that increases job satisfaction?
Ans.
Job satisfaction is the sense of fulfillment and pride felt by people who enjoy their work
and do it well. For an organization, satisfied work force ensures commitment to high
quality performance and increased productivity Job satisfaction helps organizations to
reduce complaints and grievances, absenteeism, turnover, and termination. Job
satisfaction is also linked to a healthier work force and has been found to be a good
indicator of longevity. And although only little correlation has been found between job
and productivity, it has also been found that satisfying or delighting employees is a
prerequisite to satisfying or delighting customers, thus protecting the "bottom line
(Brown, 1996).
Considering the above description of job satisfaction and high level indicators of it, I will
recommend beginning with a simple survey – a set of questions to understand how the
workers find their jobs:
These include:
1. When have I come closest to expressing my full potential in a work situation?
2. What did it look like?
3. What aspects of the workplace were most supportive?
4. What aspects of the work itself were most satisfying?
5. What did I learn from that experience that could be applied to the present situation?
6. What factor of my job that I dislike the most and why?
This survey will help me understand which of the following areas to make job
more conductive, need development:
i) Mentally Challenging Work: Do my people feel challenged enough? If yes, how am I
able to achieve that? How openly have the employees communicated back the same?
ii) Personality-Job Fit: People with personality types congruent with their chosen
vocations should find they have the right talents and abilities to meet the demands of
their jobs; and because of this success, they have a greater probability of achieving high
satisfaction from their work.
Do I see any of my employees struggle too hard to force fit a job requirement? Can we
realign or even exchanges roles of two such employees if that fits better?
iii) Equitable Rewards: Employees want pay systems and promotion policies that they
perceive as being just, unambiguous, and in line with their expectations.
Are my employees happy with the pay they receive? Do they view performance
management as a transparent and fair system? Are the consistent performers rewarded
and how transparent is that system to all?
iv) Supportive working conditions: Do I find the working conditions supportive for
effective work deliver?
v) Supportive Colleagues: How is the team dynamics? Do they work towards
team’s/organization’s goal or give more importance to the self achievements alone?
vi) Whistle blowing: Is everyone open to conflicts and being picked on if found doing
something unethical by my colleagues?
vii) Social Responsibility: How many of my employees have been warned/fired on
ethical grounds?
While the survey is being done, I would also meet with people – on the floor and in
person.
The response to the survey will give a fair idea of majors areas of concern. Meeting
individuals will give a faire idea of commonality of these. It will also help find the ones
that are misfit in the organization itself – either their personal goals do not align to the
organizations’ or they are in the wrong job.
I will ask Management to have job enrichment exercise atleast once a year. This should
be the forum when the employees should also participate, to have right commitment
levels.
We should also have some team building exercises that will help foster the team
environment.
As I submit the report with my recommendations; I will work with the management to
decide and help implement the overall plan.
Q.6 Given below is the HR policy glimpse of “iMagine”, an advertising company
1. It offers cash rewards for staff members
2. It promotes the culture of employee referral and encourages people to refer people
they know, maybe their friends, ex. colleagues, batch mates and relatives.
3. It recognizes good performances and gives fancy titles and jackets to the people who
perform well and also felicitates them in the Annual Day of the company.
What all aspects does it take care of, according to Maslow’s Need Hierarchy ?
Ans.
First let’s understand what is Maslow’s theory:
It states that human beings have wants and desires which influence their behaviour; only
unsatisfied needs can influence behavior, satisfied needs cannot.