Ut For Weld PDF

Defence Standard 02-729 Part 5
Issue 3 Date: 21 June 2013
_______________________________________
Requirements for Non-Destructive
Examination Methods
Part 5: Ultrasonic
_______________________________________
DEF STAN 02-729 Part 5 Issue 3
Contents
Foreword ..........................................................................................................................................................iv
1 Scope ..................................................................................................................................................1
2 Warning ..............................................................................................................................................1
3 Normative References.......................................................................................................................1
4 Definitions ..........................................................................................................................................2
5 Acceptance Standards......................................................................................................................3
6 Inspection...........................................................................................................................................3
7 General Inspection Requirements ...................................................................................................3
8 Plate Material .....................................................................................................................................8
9 Plate Thickness Measurement .......................................................................................................10
10 Phased Array Corrosion Mapping and Thickness Gauging .......................................................11
11 Manual ultrasonic examination of butt welds ..............................................................................13
12 Manual ultrasonic examination of tee-butt welds ........................................................................18
13 Time-of-Flight Diffraction................................................................................................................21
14 Complex Geometry..........................................................................................................................31
15 Phased Array ...................................................................................................................................33
16 Overlay Cladding .............................................................................................................................37
17 Brazed Pipe Joints ..........................................................................................................................39
18 Pipes and Tubes ..............................................................................................................................40
19 Pipe or Tube Wall Thickness Measurement .................................................................................42
20 Forgings - including Forged, Extruded and Wrought Bars.........................................................42
21 Castings ...........................................................................................................................................45
22 GRP ...................................................................................................................................................46
Annex A Weld Surface Finish and Limitations............................................................................................48
Annex B Ultrasonic ToFD Technique ...........................................................................................................51
Annex C ToFD Probe Centre separation, Look-up Tables .........................................................................57
Annex D Suggested ToFD Calibration Block...............................................................................................60
Annex E Examples of Typical ToFD Defect Images....................................................................................61
Annex F Additional ToFD Defect Images .....................................................................................................63
Annex G Ultrasonic Phased Array Technique.............................................................................................67
Annex H Characterisation of Phased Array Generated Ultrasound Beams .............................................73
Figures
Figure 1 Example of an Ultrasonic Report data sheet................................................................................6
Figure 2 Reference Block for PA Thickness Gauging, Sensitivity and Calibration ..............................11
Figure 3 Reference Test Block for Weld Thicknesses up to and including 38 mm...............................15
Figure 4 Reference Test Block for Weld Thickness greater than 38 mm ...............................................15
Figure 5 Reference Test Block for scanning with Probes in Tandem ....................................................17
Figure 6 Relationship between Reference and Record levels when using a DAC curve. ....................18
Figure 7 Combination Block covering different Weld and Plate Thickness ..........................................19
Figure 8 Ultrasonic ToFD General Probe Arrangement ...........................................................................23
Figure 9 Typical ToFD Transducer Pulse Shape and Spectrum .............................................................23
Figure 10 TOFD Scan coordinates ...............................................................................................................29
Figure 11 Example of a TOFD Ultrasonic Report data sheet .....................................................................30
Figure 12 Complex Geometry ToFD scan-plan, single sided inspection .................................................32
ii
Figure 13 Complex Geometry PA beam-plot, single sided inspection.....................................................32

Figure 14 Combined ToFD and Phased Array Butt Weld Examination ....................................................35
Figure 15 PA Minimum critical coverage, butt welds .................................................................................36
Figure 16 PA coverage, tee-butt welds ........................................................................................................37
Figure 17 Typical A-scan Displays ...............................................................................................................41
Figure 18 Forging Reference Standard Block .............................................................................................43
Figure A.1 Surface finish classes..........................................................................................................50
Figure B.1 Basic ToFD configuration....................................................................................................51
Figure B.2 A-scan record from embedded flaw ...................................................................................52
Figure B.3 ToFD D-scan..........................................................................................................................53
Figure B.4 ToFD Scans ...........................................................................................................................53
Figure B.5 Back-wall Dead Zone............................................................................................................55
Figure B.6 ToFD Synthetic Aperture Focusing Technique .................................................................56
Figure B.7 ToFD D-Scan Threshold Enhancement..............................................................................56
Figure F.1 Remote surface breaking crack, D-scan ............................................................................63
Figure F.2 Shallow remote broken surface breaking flaw, D-scan....................................................63
Figure F.3 Fatigue cracks at toe of tee-butt weld, D-scan ..................................................................64
Figure F.4 Thin plate remote surface crack, D-scan ...........................................................................64
Figure F.5 Embedded lack-of-fusion and near surface crack, D-scan ..............................................65
Figure F.6 Intermittent HAZ crack and slag line, tee-butt weld toe, D-scan .....................................65
Figure F.7 Crossing tee-butt weld and defective weld repair area, D-scan ......................................66
Figure F.8 Column type broken flaw at crossing tee-butt weld, D-scan ...........................................66
Figure G.1 Phased Array Transducer....................................................................................................67
Figure G.2 Beam Scanning Techniques................................................................................................69
Figure G.3 Linear Scan Coverage Diagram ..........................................................................................69
Figure G.4 Sectorial or Azimuthal Scan Coverage Diagram ...............................................................70
Figure G.5 Sectorial (azimuthal) S-scan................................................................................................71
Figure G.6 Linear Electronic Angled Beam Scan.................................................................................71
Figure G.7 Combined, A-scan, Electronic B-scan, C-scan, D-scan, and Echo-dynamic views ......72
Figure H.1 Phased Array Calibration Block..........................................................................................73
Figure H.2 Focal Law Images.................................................................................................................74
Tables
Table 1 Square Notch Dimensions ...........................................................................................................10
Table 2 Beam Angles..................................................................................................................................14
Table 3 Probe Selection .............................................................................................................................24
Table 4 Butt Weld D-scans ........................................................................................................................27
Table 5 Tee-butt Focus Depth and Wedge Angle Recommendations ..................................................28
Table 6 Forging Reference Block Details.................................................................................................44
Table H.1 Phased Array Beam Tolerance Values .......................................................................................74
iii
Foreword
AMENDMENT RECORD
Amd No Date Text Affected Signature and Date
REVISION NOTE
This standard is raised to Issue 3 to update its content.
HISTORICAL RECORD
This standard supersedes the following:
Def Stan 02-729 Part 5 Issue 2 (to amd 2), dated 18th Aug 2006
Def Stan 02-729 Part 5 Issue 1, dated 1st April 2000
a) This standard provides requirements and guidance for the management and production of Defence
Standards.
b) This standard has been produced on behalf of the Ministry of Defence (MOD) by UK Defence
Standardization (DStan).
c) This standard has been reached following broad consensus amongst the authorities concerned with its
use and is intended to be used whenever relevant in all future designs, contracts, orders etc. and
whenever practicable by amendment to those already in existence. If any difficulty arises which
prevents application of the Defence Standard, DStan shall be informed so that a remedy may be
sought.
d) Please address any enquiries regarding the use of this standard in relation to an invitation to tender or
to a contract in which it is incorporated, to the responsible technical or supervising authority named in
the invitation to tender or contract.
e) Compliance with this Defence Standard shall not in itself relieve any person from any legal obligations
imposed upon them.
f) This standard has been devised solely for the use of the MOD and its contractors in the execution of
contracts for the MOD. To the extent permitted by law, the MOD hereby excludes all liability whatsoever
and howsoever arising (including, but without limitation, liability resulting from negligence) for any loss or
damage however caused when the standard is used for any other purpose.
iv
0 Introduction
0.1 This Defence Standard covers the procedures and methods to be used for the Quality Assessment of
Ultrasonic Examining Authorities and for the Ultrasonic Examinations of welded and brazed joints, cast and
wrought materials, weld metal cladding, pipes and tubes in HM Submarine and Surface Ships not in Class.
0.2 It includes the minimum requirements for; the Ultrasonic Examination of glass reinforced plastic (GRP)
RN structures; the Ultrasonic Corrosion Mapping and Thickness Gauging of plate material utilising the
Phased Array technique; and the minimum requirements for the advanced Ultrasonic Examination of
'Complex Geometry' butt welds.
0.3 This standard has been produced on behalf of DES NAG-MT.
0.4 The standard has been agreed by the authorities concerned with its use and is intended to be used
whenever relevant in all future designs, contracts, orders etc. and whenever practicable by amendment to
those already in existence. If any difficulty arises which prevents application of the Defence Standard, the
Directorate of Standardization (DStan) shall be informed so that a remedy may be sought.
0.5 This standard has been revised to reflect changes in Departmental Nomenclature due to the MOD
reorganisations and the changes to technical requirements.
v
This Page is Intentionally Blank
Requirements for Non-Destructive Examination Methods

Part 5: Ultrasonic
1 Scope
1.1 This part of Defence Standard 02-729 covers the procedures and methods to be used for the Quality
Assessment of Ultrasonic Examining Authorities and for the ultrasonic examination of welded and brazed
joints, cast and wrought materials, weld metal cladding, pipes and tubes in HM Submarines and Surface
Ships not in Class. The methods described are the minimum requirements for the detection of surface and
sub-surface imperfections and for the measurement of plate, and tube wall, thickness.
1.2 This Defence Standard (Def Stan) also includes the minimum requirements for the ultrasonic
examination of RN GRP structures for the detection of delamination(s). The effective application of ultrasonic
examination techniques and methods described in this standard may be restricted in materials with
inherently high or variable attenuation or which produce severe scattering of the ultrasonic beam. Complex
shapes may also limit satisfactory application and the examination is to be applied at stages during
manufacture when the geometry of the component is relatively simple, provided that subsequent specified
treatments of the material do not render the examination ineffective.
1.3 This Def Stan does not contain acceptance criteria for any imperfection thus revealed and does not
apply to nuclear plant and machinery to which DG Ships/PS/5108 applies. The extent to which ultrasonic
examination is required is not included herein but will be stated in the relevant Contract Documents.
2 Warning
The Ministry of Defence (MOD), like its contractors, is subject to both United Kingdom and European laws
regarding Health and Safety at Work. Many Defence Standards set out processes and procedures that could
be injurious to health if adequate precautions are not taken. Adherence to those processes and procedures
in no way absolves users from complying with legal requirements relating to Health and Safety at Work.
3 Normative References
3.1 The publications shown below are referred to in the text of this standard. Publications are grouped and
listed in alpha-numeric order.
BS EN 583 Non-destructive testing. Ultrasonic examination

Part 6: Time-of-flight diffraction technique as a method for detection and sizing of
discontinuities
BS EN 1330 Non-destructive testing. Terminology
Part 4: Terms used in ultrasonic testing
BS EN 10228 Non-destructive testing of steel forgings
Part 3: Ultrasonic testing of ferritic or martensitic steel forgings
Part 4: Ultrasonic testing of austenitic and austenitic-ferritic stainless steel forgings.
BS EN 12223 Non-destructive testing. Ultrasonic examination. Specification for calibration
block No.1
BS EN 12668 Non-destructive testing. Characterization and verification of ultrasonic examination
equipment
Part 1: Instruments
Part 2: Probes
Part 3: Combined equipment
1
BS EN 16018 Non-destructive testing, Terminology

Terms used in ultrasonic testing with phased arrays
BS EN ISO 9712 Non-destructive testing — Qualification and certification of NDT personnel — General
principles
BS EN ISO 10863 Non-destructive testing of welds, Ultrasonic testing,
Use of time-of-flight diffraction technique (TOFD)
BS EN ISO 17640 Non-destructive testing of welds. Ultrasonic testing.
Techniques, testing levels, and assessment
Def Stan 02-736 Requirements for Q1 (Navy) Quality Steel
Part 1: Plates
Part 4: Rolled Sections.
Def Stan 02-745 Classification, Inspection Requirements and Acceptance Standards for Castings
Def Stan 02-752 GRP Ships & Boats Maintenance Survey & Repair
Part 1: Requirements for Survey, Report of Survey and Structural Safety Certification
Def Stan 02-773 Minimum Non-Destructive Examination Acceptance Standards for Welds in
HM Submarines and Surface Ships not in Class
Def Stan 02-863 Requirements for Classification, Dimensions, Tolerances and General Standards of
Acceptance for Copper and Nickel Alloy Castings
DG Ships/PS/5108 Non-Destructive Examination for Nuclear Plant Primary Systems and Components.
3.2 Reference in this Standard to any normative references means in any Invitation to Tender or contract
the edition and all amendments current at the date of such tender or contract unless a specific edition is
indicated. Care should be taken when referring out to specific portions of other standards to ensure that they
remain easily identifiable where subsequent amendments and supersession’s might be made. For some
standards the most recent editions shall always apply due to safety and regulatory requirements.
3.3 In consideration of clause 3.2 above, users shall be fully aware of the issue, amendment status and
application of all normative references, particularly when forming part of an Invitation to Tender or contract.
Correct application of standards is as defined in the ITT or contract.
3.4 DStan can advise regarding where to obtain normative referenced documents. Requests for such
information can be made to the DStan Helpdesk. Details of how to contact the helpdesk are shown on the
outside rear cover of Defence Standards.
4 Definitions
For the purpose of this standard definitions contained in BS EN 1330-4 and BS EN 16018 are to apply to the
relevant terms used in this Def Stan. The following additional definitions are also to apply:
4.1
Design Authority
The body that has overall responsibility for the system concerned.
4.2
Examining Authority
The Company, Organisation, Establishment or Naval Base that carries out the radiographic examination
within the scope of this Part.
4.3
MOD(N) Approval
Where approval is to be sought from MOD(N) for ultrasonic inspection procedures, scan-plans and beam-
plots, particularly for 'Complex Geometry', Section 14, this is to be obtained from DES NAG-MT.
2
5 Acceptance Standards
The standards for acceptance of defect indications detected by ultrasonic examination are to be as specified
in the Contract Documents. Where not specified therein, Def Stan 02-773, Def Stan 02-745, Def Stan 02-863
or Def Stan 02-736 Parts 1 and 4 are to apply as appropriate. In the case of GRP structures, reference is to
be made to Def Stan 02-752 part 1 where applicable.
6 Inspection
a) It is not the intent of this Def Stan to exclude proven inspection procedures that can be demonstrated to
the satisfaction of the Design Authority to meet the quality requirements. Prior approval is to be obtained
before such procedures are used.
b) Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, acceptance inspection is to be performed on an

item in the final surface condition and the final heat-treatment condition.
7 General Inspection Requirements
7.1 Personnel Requirements
a) The Examining Authority is to ensure that all personnel associated with ultrasonic examination have
been adequately trained to the levels (Level 1, 2 and 3) appropriate to their responsibilities and maintain
records accordingly; personnel should have a certificate from a nationally or internationally accredited
scheme in accordance with BS EN ISO 9712, e.g. PCN or equivalent.
b) Personnel performing and interpreting ultrasonic examinations are to be able to carry out an operational
type test using the test method or technique to be used in production. The Examining Authority is to be
able to interpret the results and be familiar with the standards to which they are working. Personnel are
to be considered qualified when they have demonstrated their ability to meet the requirements of the
approved procedure.
c) Level 1 operatives must have demonstrated their competence to carry out NDT according to written
instructions and under supervision of a Level 2 or Level 3 personnel. Within the scope of the
competence defined on the certificate, Level 1 personnel may be authorised by the employer to setup
the equipment, perform the tests, record and classify the results in terms of written criteria, report the
results. Level 1 personnel shall not however be responsible for the choice of test method or technique to
be used, nor the assessment of the test results.
d) Level 2 operatives must have demonstrated their competence to carry out NDT according to established
or recognised procedures. Within the scope of the competence defined on the certificate, Level 2
personnel may be authorised by the employer to the same as a Level 1 operative but additionally to;
select the NDT technique, define the limitations of the test method, translate NDT standards, setup and
verify equipment settings, perform and supervise tests, prepare written instructions, carry out and
supervise all tasks at or below Level 2, provide guidance for personnel at or below Level 2, organise and
report the results of tests.
e) Level 3 operatives are qualified to direct any NDT for which they are certificated and may be authorised
by the employer to undertake all Level 1 and Level 2 duties, and additionally to; take full responsibility
for a test facility and staff, establish and review NDT written instructions and procedures, designate test
methods and techniques, interpret codes, standards and specifications, provide guidance and
supervision at all levels. Level 3 personnel are to have demonstrated their competence to interpret and
evaluate test results in terms of existing standards and specifications, and to possess the required level
of knowledge in materials, fabrication and product technology to enable the appropriate selection of
NDT methods and techniques, to assist the establishment of non-standard NDT test criteria and
procedures.
3
f) Personnel are to be conversant with the effects of:
1) surface condition;
2) material structure (grain size, attenuation etc.);
3) transducer size and type (compression, shear and surface wave);
4) the effect of dead zone;
5) test frequency;
6) acoustic couplant;
7) method of calibration;
8) use of attenuator;
9) display characteristics;
10) flaw indication measurement.
g) A register of approved personnel shall be kept by the Examining Authority.
7.2 Ultrasonic Test Procedure
a) Ultrasonic examination is to be performed in accordance with a written test procedure. Each Examining
Authority is to certify that the procedure is in accordance with this specification and is to submit each
procedure to the Design Authority for written approval.
b) All ultrasonic examinations are to be recorded in an ultrasonic report, in which the following information
is to be recorded. An example of an ultrasonic report data sheet, showing the typical information
recorded is illustrated in Figure 1.
1) Descriptive details of the item under examination, including material type, shape and size for
welds, the weld preparation and welding details, and the surface finish. Sketches as necessary;
2) Equipment details:
i) model or type and make;

ii) monitoring and recording detail;
iii) special features, i.e. probe guides or saddles;
iv) positive identification of probes, types, makes, including transducer sizes, frequency and beam
angles;
v) couplant type;
3) Examination details: Scanning method, i.e. manual, automated, semi-automated, immersion etc.
Scanning directions and the test surfaces used;
4) Calibration procedures and sensitivity checks with details of reference blocks used. The method
and frequency of sensitivity checks in production;
5) The method of recording the results of examination;
6) Pre examination and post examination cleaning methods as applicable;
7) Date, place and time of examination.
4
7.3 Equipment Requirements
Ultrasonic equipment is to consist of the following:

1) Electronic apparatus capable of producing, receiving and displaying high frequency electrical
pulses at the required frequencies and energy levels. The apparatus is to have the capability to meet
the calibration requirements for specific tests and feature a calibrated attenuator;
2) The equipment is to have a well-defined display that is capable of displaying the relevant
ultrasonic information in a single or multiple-display format to allow calibration and subsequent
analysis of the ultrasonic signals;
3) Probe, with single, double or multi-element transducers, capable of transforming electrical
impulses into mechanical ultrasonic vibrations and vice-versa at specific frequencies, and capable of
transmitting the ultrasound into the material and/or receiving the returning energy via a suitable
coupling medium;
4) Ultrasonic couplant, i.e. a liquid or gel having suitable wetting and acoustic impedance properties
in order to maximise the transmittance of acoustic energy into and out-off the component.
Environmental conditions may limit the choice of couplant other than water;
5) Calibration blocks for the assessment of probe and electronic apparatus characteristics and
performance;
6) Reference blocks for pre-test calibration of the applicable acceptance or rejection test sensitivity
levels to aid interpretation and the reproduction of test results.
5
Procedure No Issue No Date
Company Procedure drafted by
Approved by
Examination conducted by
COMPONENT DESCRIPTION
Title Contract Order No
Drg No Material
Materials Casting/Forging/Weld/Other
specification
Area Examined
(a) Location (b) Thickness
(c) Surface condition. (d) Surface preparation
TECHNIQUE DETAILS
1. Instrumentation
(a) Test instrument Model/Serial no.
(b) Mode of presentation A-scan, B-scan, C-scan, D-scan:
(c) Method of recording Manual – hardcopy, electronic, logging etc.
Probe(s) Type: Twin crystal/Single – Compression/Shear

2. Type of Test
Automatic/Immersion/Irrigated Probe/
Manual/Semi-automated/Contact
Couplant: Water/Glycerol/Cellulose paste/other
Scan control: Mechanical/Template guide/other
3. Sensitivity Calibration
Test piece material Thickness
Calibration Target
a. Flat Bottom Hole: Dia. mm Depth. mm Beam path length.
b. Notch length. mm Depth. mm Width: mm
4. Scanning Details
Directions, surfaces used, coverage.
Diagrams to be used as necessary.
5. Acceptance Standard Specification
6. Supplementary Information
Figure 1 Example of an Ultrasonic Report data sheet
6
7.4 Equipment Performance Characteristics
Prior to use or after maintenance and/or a period of inactivity, the following equipment performance
characteristics are to be assessed and the results recorded, using Block 1 to BS EN 12223 and the methods
in BS EN 12668 (Parts 2 and 3).
1) Time base linearity over the required working range.
2) Linearity of amplifier.
3) Swept gain (if featured).
4) Overall system gain.
5) Signal-to-Noise ratio.
6) Calibrated attenuator accuracy.
7) Beam characteristics, dead zone and resolution.
8) Probe(s) angle(s) of refraction and index points.
7.5 Equipment Qualification
a) Equipment is to be considered qualified when, in accordance with clause 7.4, records of the
characteristics show:
1) time base linearity measured between at least five multiple echoes is within ± 2%;
2) amplifier linearity ± 1 dB, i.e. the difference in the attenuator values noted in reducing a back-wall
echo from a steel sample from 80% Full Screen Height (FSH) to 40% FSH to 20% is to be 6 dB ± 1
dB in each case;
3) swept gain signal amplitudes are within ± 2 dB over the working range observing at least five
multiple echoes;
4) signal-to-noise ratio based on a 20% FSH echo from the 1.5 mm hole in Block 1. This echo is to
exceed noise level by 12 dB;
5) calibrated attenuator covers the working range required in steps not greater than 2 dB with an
accuracy of ± 1 dB over any 20 dB range;
6) compression wave probes should be capable of resolving the 3 mm and 5 mm steps in a suitable
calibration block for frequency ranges 4- 6 MHz and 2 – 2.5 MHz respectively.
7) shear wave probes should be capable of resolving the 2 mm and 3 mm steps in a suitable
calibration block for frequency ranges 4 – 6 MHz and 2 – 2.5 MHz respectively.
8) the area of each transmitting and/or receiving crystal does not exceed 350 square mm and that
no dimension of the crystal face exceeds 25 mm;
9) probe angle of refraction is within ± 2 degrees of stipulated angle;
10) probe index point as marked is within 1 mm of that measured using Block 1.
b) The above equipment checks inherently qualify both the probe and the electronic equipment. It is
essential therefore that qualification be established for each probe that is to be used.
7.6 Sensitivity Calibration Reference Blocks
Immediately prior to the examination of each item the required equipment sensitivity is to be established by
the use of reference blocks which simulate the item as regards to the material type and thickness range. The
test blocks are to contain suitable calibration target reflectors, e.g. flat bottom holes or slots, in simulation of
the characteristics of defect types expected to occur in the item to be examined. The targets are to be
positioned away from other reflecting surfaces to ensure they can be clearly and individually resolved by the
equipment used.
7
7.7 Method of Examination
1) Controlled reproducible examination at the specified sensitivity is to be consistently achieved and

maintained.
2) The equipment is always to be calibrated to the appropriate reference standards before the
examination begins. Calibration is to be checked at intervals during the examination.
3) Probe characteristics and probe movement, signal amplitude and the material attenuation effects
are to be taken into consideration when the significance of defects is being assessed.
4) The movement or rotation of the probes or test item is to be controlled as closely as possible to
maintain a uniform testing speed. The test speed is not to exceed the maximum speed at which the
reference standard can be scanned and produce clear resolution of the targets, and is to be
consistent with operator readout efficiency.
5) It may be necessary to verify indications of defects revealed during ultrasonic examination by the
use of an alternative ultrasonic technique or non-destructive test method.
6) The attenuation difference between the test material and that of the simulation test block is to be
compared by the use of the first back-wall echo height in compression wave examination, and by the
use of a target corner echo height for shear wave examination. As necessary the equipment
sensitivity is to be adjusted to compensate for attenuation variations between the test item and the
test block. These adjustments will normally be minimal and it must be ensured that the signal from
the least apparent calibration target is still detectable. On test items that do not present a target
corner for the shear wave examination, the attenuation difference established with the compression
wave probe is to be used.
7) The use of a distance amplitude curve (DAC) is recommended. Curves are to be constructed for
the particular equipment combination in use. When using equipment with ‘Swept Gain’, a time
controlled gain (TCG) function can be used such that the DAC becomes a straight line.
8) The effect of 'dead zone' under the probe is to be minimised by a complementary examination
from the opposite surface to that first used on the item under test or by the use of a twin crystal
probe unless the material in the 'dead zone' is subsequently to be removed by machining.
7.8 Surface Finish
The surface of the item to be tested is to be clean and free from dirt, loose scale or paint or other foreign
matter to ensure effective acoustic coupling and test. Ideal surfaces are those smooth and clean to bright
metal. Depending on the profile and surface condition, dressing of the weld area may be necessary even
when probe contact is only to be made with parent material. Guidance on weld surface finishes is given in
normative Annex A. On completion of the test, the couplant is to be removed in accordance with the
requirements of the specification applicable to the test item.
8 Plate Material
8.1 Application
The methods described are for the ultrasonic pulse-echo examination of the plate material 6 mm thickness
and greater.
8.2 Surface Preparation
The plate is to be in the pickled, shot and abrasive condition and the test surface is to comply with clause
7.8. The test surface may have one coat of primer. If necessary the surface may be smoothed to assure
effective acoustic coupling and test.
8.3 Compression Wave Inspection
The test frequency range is 2 to 5 MHz. The transducer size is to conform to the requirements in clause 7.5a.
8
8.4 Calibration
a) A test block is to be prepared from sound material of the same material group (i.e. low alloy steel,
austenitic stainless steel, copper nickel, monel etc.) and within ± 10% of the thickness of the material to
be examined:
1) For plate material up to and including 25 mm thick, a 6 mm diameter flat bottom hole is to be
drilled from one plate surface to depth one half of the test block thickness.
2) For thicknesses over 25 mm, two or more 6 mm diameter flat bottom holes will be required. Holes
are to be drilled from one plate surface to depths 12 mm from each surface, and intermediate such
that the difference in the depths of successive holes does not exceed 26 mm, e.g.:
28 mm thickness 2 holes minimum, 12 mm and 26 mm deep
50 mm thickness 2 holes minimum, 12 mm and 38 mm deep
75 mm thickness 3 holes minimum, 12 mm, 38 mm and 63 mm deep
100 mm thickness 4 holes minimum, 12 mm, 38 mm, 63 mm and 88 mm deep
3) The time base is to be calibrated and marked in such a way as to indicate the nominal plate
thickness.
4) Maintaining the same gain control position throughout, the instrument sensitivity is to be adjusted
to display a 20% FSH at each of the following stages, and the indicated attenuator value recorded:
The first back-wall echo through an undrilled section of the test bloc = A dB
The least detectable hole in the test block = B dB
The first back-wall echo through the plate to be examined = C dB
Each of the remaining holes in the test block = D dB etc.
5) The difference between attenuator values A and C will be the compensating factor to be used in
the production examination. The Minimum Search Sensitivity will be = C-(A-B) dB.
6) The assessment of defect significance is to be made relative to the depth of the indication below
the test surface. Defects at depths other than that of the least detectable hole are to be assessed
using an adjusted search sensitivity value derived by substituting the attenuator value recorded for
the equivalent depth hole in the test block. (Relevant D dB value from clause 8.4a 4)
b) Where the amplitude of the first back-wall echo is reduced to 20% FSH or less, and is unaccompanied
by evidence of laminar inclusions, the plate surfaces are to be checked and dressed if necessary to
ensure adequate acoustic coupling.
Each plate is to be marked on one major surface with grid lines normal to the direction of rolling and
separated by not more than 5% of the plate width or 90% of the transducer diameter whichever is the
greater. Each grid line is to be scanned in accordance with clauses 8.6b and 8.6c. In addition, each edge of
the plate is to be similarly scanned along a parallel track not exceeding 50 mm from the edge, unless
included in the grid pattern.
8.6 Shear Wave Examination
a) Where examination using shear wave is specified or required, the shear wave sensitivity is to be set to a
reference notch of dimensions given in Table 1. The notch is to be suitably positioned in a reference/test
block that conforms to clause 7.6. The instrument calibration is to be carried out using a shear wave
probe of suitable angle and frequency. The time base display is to be calibrated by obtaining peak
amplitude reflections from the notch at half-skip distance, i.e. with probe placed on the surface opposite
the notch; and at full-skip distance, i.e. with the probe placed on the surface containing the notch. The
test sensitivity is to be such that the minimum signal amplitude from the notch at full skip distance is
20% FSH. Equipment sensitivity is to be adjusted to compensate for attenuation variation between the
item under test and the test block.
9
Table 1 Square Notch Dimensions
Depth of notch,
3% or 0.1 mm whichever is the greater
expressed as a percentage of plate thickness
Width of notch 2 x depth
Length of notch Approximately 40 mm
b) Shear wave testing is to be performed by scanning one major surface in two directions, i.e. parallel to
and normal to the direction of rolling of the plate. The probe unit is to be moved in parallel paths. In the
event of defect indication that approaches in amplitude that of the reference notch, the adjacent area is
to be scanned by the continuous method indexing approximately 90% of the width of the transducer
sufficient to establish the size and location of the discontinuity.
c) Detection of a defective area or an area of attenuation wholly contained within a 75 mm diameter circle
is to require 100% examination of adjacent material within 600 mm of the defect. Detection of a laminar
inclusion is to require 100% check of adjacent material within 300 mm of the defect. Details are to be
recorded as required by clause 8.7.
8.7 Recording
The following information is to be recorded in addition to the test procedure:

1) Location and size of any true lamination.
2) Location and size of any area where the first back-wall echo is attenuated to 20% FSH or less, after
plate surface preparation.
3) Locations and size of laminar inclusions having a reflectivity in excess of the equivalent depth 6 mm
diameter hole.
4) When using shear waves the location and signal amplitude of any indication above the reference
level (8.6a).
9 Plate Thickness Measurement
9.1 Plate Thickness
Plate thickness may be measured by using conventional pulse-echo flaw detection equipment or direct
readout ultrasonic thickness gauging instruments with meter or digital display. Flaw detection equipment is to
comply with clause 7.5a. Direct readout instruments are to be used only for measurement of thickness within
the manufacturer's marked ranges and provided that the instrument accuracy is within the permitted
thickness tolerance for the item to be tested.
9.2 Instrument Calibration
a) Calibration is to be carried out using a suitable test block of the same material type and of thickness that
is within the permitted thickness tolerance applicable to the item to be tested. Direct readout instruments
are to be calibrated and checked for drift, suitability and accuracy in accordance with the instrument
manufacturer's instructions.
b) Test blocks may consist of machined step wedges or a series of machined discs that cover the range of
materials and thicknesses to be tested. Blocks and discs are to be clearly marked preferably by
engraving to indicate material type and thickness.
10
9.3 Coverage
The extent of coverage of thickness gauging is to be as specified in the Contract Documents. Thickness
gauging of plate carried out in conjunction with clause 8.5 is to be measured on the grid lines at intervals not
greater than 600 mm. Reference to Def Stan 02-736 Part 4 may also be required.
Plates are to be free from any surface imperfection that will interfere with the test. Surface imperfections may
be removed by wire brushing or light grinding to sound metal provided the thickness is not reduced below the
minimum thickness permitted by specification and the ground area faired into the surrounding metal.
10 Phased Array Corrosion Mapping and Thickness Gauging

Corrosion mapping and thickness gauging can be carried out using a suitable phased array system, which
has been approved by the Design Authority. Two types of probes were approved for use with the system, a
‘0° degree’ fixed wedge configuration and a captive immersion probe system, such as a roller scanner.
10.1 Qualification
During qualification the design authorities’ guidance should be sought for specific applications. However, it is
suggested that for initial performance evaluation test blocks should be manufactured covering the range of
material to be tested. These test blocks should contain machined steps for basic thickness calibration, and a
series of machined holes and slots of differing percentage losses as a resolution/sensitivity check. Holes and
slots are to be clearly marked preferably by engraving to indicate their position and percentage loss. A
typical test block is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2 Reference Block for PA Thickness Gauging, Sensitivity and Calibration
11
10.2 Instrument Calibration
Calibration is to be carried out using a dedicated block, which should be:

1) Of the same grade of material as the item under test;
2) Of a thickness within ±10% of the thickness of the item under test;
3) The sensitivity achieved on the holes/square areas is to be greater than the acceptance criteria level
specified by the Design Authority for the examination.
10.3 Coverage
The extent of coverage for thickness gauging of plates is specified in Def Stan 02-736. For in-service
applications the extent of corrosion mapping/thickness gauging will be specified in the contract documents.
The resolution of the readings is to be agreed with the customer prior to commencement of the examination.
Plates are to be free from any surface imperfection that will interfere with the test. Surface imperfections may
be removed by wire brushing or light grinding provided the thickness is not reduced to below the minimum
thickness permitted by specification.
10.5 Probes
The probe selected for the phased array examination is to be suitable for the thickness to be tested; e.g.
Olympus 7.5L64 (for thicknesses ranging from 2 mm to 22 mm), 5L64 A2 (for thicknesses ranging from 5
mm to 25 mm) or the 5L60 (for thicknesses ranging from 15 mm to 90 mm) pipe wizard array.
10.6 Wedges
a) Shaped wedges may be used for items that have a curved surface, i.e. torpedo tubes. To ensure
shaped wedge setup is correct and calibrated, a shaped calibration test block is to be made. In addition
to the requirements in clause 7.8, the surface geometry of this test block is to be similar to that of the
test surface to be examined.
b) Where the curve is negligible a flat wedge may be used, ideally the gap between the test surface and
the bottom of the probe shoe should not be greater than 0.5 mm (Clause 6.3.4 of BS EN ISO 17640). In
addition, care must be taken when using flat wedges to ensure that the standing back-wall echo (BWE)
of the wedge is not in the thickness range of interest, leading to problems with gating and false signals.
10.7 Phased Array corrosion mapping colour palette
a) Colour palettes should be used to identify areas with reduced thickness. Two ranges have been agreed
with the design authority, one for materials less than 12 mm the other for materials greater than 12 mm.
The colours to percentage loss are listed below:
1) Palette requirements for 12 mm plate and greater

Nominal plate thickness or above = White
Nominal to -2% = Green
-2% to -3% = Yellow
-3% to -5% = Blue
-5% to -7% = Red
-7% and greater = Black
12
2) Palette requirements for 12 mm plate and less

Nominal plate thickness or above = White
Nominal to -3% = Green
-3% to -5% = Yellow
-5% to -12% = Blue
-12% to -18% = Red
-18% and greater = Black
a) The Phased array probe and wedge shall be connected to a calibrated positional encoder to identify and
facilitate the position of any area of loss of thickness. This encoding can be either in one plane or fitted
to a scanner to give X-Y co-ordinates. Typical examples of the type of scanners that give X-Y co-
ordinates are the Olympus Glider Scanner and Olympus Chain Scanner.
b) It should be ensured that no lines of data are missed due to of lack of couplant or poor probe surface
contact. During the scan the operators should monitor both the ‘A-scan' display, which is a single
element virtual probe aperture (VPA), and the composite amplitude C-scan, which records all A-scans. If
an unacceptable amount of scan data is missed the scanner is to be reversed and the area re-scanned.
c) Areas to be examined are to be scanned in a logical order to ensure that no areas are missed when the
data is down loaded to the selected analysis software. For a non X-Y encoded system a ‘scan-map’ is to
be produced in order that a repeat scan can be performed at a later date, from the same datum with the
same scan orientation, to assess any known areas of concern.
10.9 Records
As a result of the corrosion mapping, inclusions and laminations are to be characterised and sentenced by
the following information, in sufficient detail to apply the appropriate acceptance criteria, Clause 5, e.g. plate
acceptance standard, Def-Stan 02-736 Pt.1, Issue 3, Annex E Acceptance Criteria.
1) Position from a known datum or by reference to a permanent feature like an internal frame
identified with a VLO scan;
2) Length and/or width;
3) Depth and through thickness height;
4) Plate thickness, T, in mm.
Surface conditions which affect the scan quality are to be noted, for instance heavy pitting/scaring or
attachments that correspond to lost data in the scan record.
11 Manual ultrasonic examination of butt welds
11.1 Application
The application of ultrasonic methods to the examination of butt welds is influenced by the types of materials
in use, their thickness and geometry, and the required flaw sensitivity. The influence of the properties of the
structure in the weld and heat affected zone may restrict application. The use of modified probes may be
essential where testing is carried out on materials that have differing acoustic velocities to those for which
commercial probes are normally designed. When testing these materials it will be necessary to ensure that
the probe refracted angle used is correct.
13
11.2 Probes
a) Compression and shear wave probes may be single or combined double (twin) crystal types of test
frequency 2-6 MHz. In addition to the requirements in clause 7.5a, the compression transducer area is
to be not less than 100 square mm and the shear transducer area not less than 70 square mm. The
weld preparation and material thickness are to be taken into account when selecting the shear wave
probe angle. It is to be noted that a beam incident on a reflecting surface at 30º degrees will undergo
mode conversion, which may give rise to spurious indications. There will also be a loss of shear wave
energy of up to 20 dB. The direction of the beam is to be as near to normal to the angle of the weld edge
preparation as possible.
b) The use of various probe-refracted angles may be necessary for the assessment of defect type and
severity. Beam angles generally suited to different thicknesses of material are given in Table 2.
Table 2 Beam Angles
Probe refracted angles Probe feature Material thickness
70º – 80º Single or combined 6 mm – 15 mm

double
60º – 70º 12 mm – 35 mm
45º – 60º Single or combined 35 mm – 60 mm

double and probes-in-
45º tandem Over 60 mm
11.3 Surface Finish
The condition of the probe contact surface of the item to be examined is to be such that satisfactory coupling
between the probe and test surface can be maintained. Surfaces are to be free from scale, rust, weld spatter
and other foreign matter. The surface condition of the weld is to be such that it does not adversely influence
the examination; preparation of the weld surfaces is to be completed consistent with the requirements to
carry out effective ultrasonic examination and accurate interpretation. Depending on the profile and surface
condition, dressing of the weld area may be necessary even when probe contact is only to be made with
parent material. Guidance on weld surface finishes is given in normative Annex A. The weld surface finish
should be recorded in the ultrasonic examination report data sheet.
11.4 Calibration
a) The calibration test piece ideally comprises a sample weld that simulates both the geometry and
material features of the weld to be examined. In the absence of such a sample a machined test block of
the same material and thickness as the item under test can be used, see Figures 3 and 4. Calibration
targets consist of holes drilled normal to the examining surface or slots placed as shown. The calibration
target type and size is to be as specified by the Design Authority who may require hole type targets for
particular applications regardless of the thickness to be examined. As differences in the production
material may cause attenuation, frequent checking is essential during inspection to ensure the required
working sensitivity is maintained. The thickness ‘T’ refers to the nominal plate thickness, ±10%, in which
the butt weld is made as specified in relevant drawings for cross-reference.
b) The use of the Suppresser/Reject control will adversely affect the linearity of the amplifier. Suppression
is therefore to be minimal. Should subsequent adjustment of this control be necessary, changes in
amplitude linearity are to be noted for consideration in defect sizing.
c) The instrument is to be calibrated to show half or full skip range in the weld thickness being inspected,
plus a minimum of 25 mm. The 1st refection from the target is to be set to the DAC (Distance Amplitude
Curve). This, when adjusted for attenuation, will be the reference sensitivity. When using equipment with
‘Swept Gain’, a time controlled gain (TCG) function can be used such that the DAC becomes a straight
line.
14
Half-skip distance plus Full-skip distance plus

one probe length one probe length
For thicknesses up to
and including 20 mm,
dia. of hole = 1.5 mm
Not less than

75 mm wide
For thicknesses greater than
20 mm up to and including 38 mm,
dia. of hole = 3 mm
Thickness T = nominal plate thickness of the butt weld

as specified in relevant drawings for cross-reference
Tolerance ±10%
Figure 3 Reference Test Block for Weld Thicknesses up to and including 38 mm
NOTE Blocks of less than 75 mm width may be acceptable providing the restriction does not
impede the ultrasonic calibration.
Half-skip distance plus Full-skip distance plus

one probe length one probe length
Square notch cut in top surface

and surface opposite
Not less than
50 mm wide
Notch depth = 3% T
Notch width = 2 x Depth
Notch depth = 3% T
Notch width = 2 x Depth
Thickness T = nominal plate thickness of the butt weld

as specified in relevant drawings for cross-reference
Tolerance ±10%
Figure 4 Reference Test Block for Weld Thickness greater than 38 mm
15
d) Attenuation variation due to beam path length and the material is to be taken into account before
assessment of defect severity. For example; in the examination of butt welds between plate and forged
material, or between plate and cast material.
a) Plate material adjacent to the weld through which the shear wave must pass is to be inspected in
accordance with the requirements for plate compression wave inspection, clause 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5. Any
defective areas are to be recorded.
b) Shear wave scanning is to be carried out from both sides of the weld on one plate surface wherever the
fabrication geometry permits. Where changes in section occur, scans from the other plate surfaces may
be carried out to ensure 100% coverage of the weld.
1) Welds up to 12 mm thick.
The shear wave scan may be carried out by directing the probe normal to the weld, with the probe
index positioned at the optimum distance of the probe skip distance from the centre line of weld and
by moving the probe in a path parallel with the centre line of the weld.
2) Welds over 12 mm up to and including 50 mm.
Shear wave inspection may be carried out in a series of scanning movements parallel with the weld
at intervals not exceeding 60% of the transducer diameter or length. Alternatively the probe may be
oscillated to and from the weld and progressed along the weld at intervals not exceeding 90% of the
width or diameter of the transducer. The probe system is to be directed normal to the weld centre
line, preferably by mechanical means.
3) Welds greater than 50 mm. Examination is to be considered in two stages.
4) Stage one – Scanning is to be carried out as required in clause 11.5b2). The effectiveness of this
scan will be dependent upon the knowledge of the weld preparation detail; provided that it has first
been established that this scan will provide for the complete and effective examination of the weld,
the first stage scan will suffice.
5) Stage two – This scan is to follow stage one when the effectiveness of stage one scan is in doubt
and in all situations where there is insufficient knowledge of the weld geometry. Stage two is to
comprise a minimum of three separate scans on each side of the weld using transmitting (Tx) and
receiving (Rx) probes in tandem. The probes are to be suitably linked so that the required distance
between them for each scan is maintained (see Figure 5).
6) For the detection of transverse defects irrespective of the material thickness, direct inspection
from the surface of the weld is preferred. Where the necessary surface preparation (Annex A)
cannot be achieved, inspection should be carried out at the shallowest possible oblique angle to the
weld, in both directions from both plates.
11.6 Repairs in Butt Welds
a) Where weld repairs have been undertaken to rectify previously reported and unacceptable defects, the
examination of these areas shall be in accordance with clause 11.5; utilising the probe-refracted angle
used for the original examination along with one additional angle. Where more than one refracted angle
was used in the original examination, no additional angles are required.
b) The extent of the examination of the weld repair is to be in accordance with Clause 17.4 of Def Stan 02-
770 Part 1. That is;
1) Covering a minimum area extending 25 mm beyond the weld edges and beyond the length of the
repair in each direction, for the repair of non-laminar type defects. The preference is to extend the
length of the examination by 150 mm at both ends of the butt weld repair;
2) Covering a repair area extending 300 mm beyond the weld edges and beyond the length of the
repair in each direction for the repair of laminar type defects;
3) All adjacent welds within 150 mm from a repair are to be examined by visual means.
16
Probes linked
Tx.1 Rx.1
Tx.2 Rx.2
D Tx.3 Rx.3
6mm Diameter
T/4 Flat Bottom Holes (FBH)
T/4
T/4
T/4
L Scan lines
Centre line of weld
Probe separation
for scan 1.
Scan parallel to
centre line of weld
Probe separation
for scan 2.
Scan both sides of Probe separation

weld for scan 3.
T = Test block thickness = Nominal plate thickness of the butt weld, as specified in the relevant
drawings for cross-reference
D = Hole depth. This should be sufficient for clear resolution with no interference from other surfaces
L = Block length = ‘D’ plus probe centre separation, ‘Tx1 – Rx1’, plus one probe length
Figure 5 Reference Test Block for scanning with Probes in Tandem
11.7 Records
Records of the weld examination are to include the results of the compression wave examination required by
clause 11.5a. Defect indications that result from the shear wave examination having a reflectivity equal to or
above DAC minus 12 dB (see Figure 6 ) are to be recorded in sufficient detail to apply the acceptance
standard in Def Stan 02-773.
17
Figure 6 Relationship between Reference and Record levels when using a DAC curve.
12 Manual ultrasonic examination of tee-butt welds
12.1 Application
a) Ultrasonic examination is applied to tee-butt welds for the detection of defects in the welding, and in the
plate in the vicinity of the weld. Defects in the plate may include defects of laminar form, and cracks in
the toes of the welding orientated at an angle with the plate surface.
b) Reference is made to:
1) Two types of examination:
i) Complete examination – This requires the use of compression wave and shear wave
techniques.
ii) Partial examination – This requires the use of compression wave technique only. This method
of examination may be adequate for the table-web connection of fabricated frames.
2) Signal amplitudes DL and SL, which are defined as follows:

DL = Datum Line = 20% FSH from the relevant test block target.
SL = 6 dB Line = DL minus 6 dB of attenuation = 10% FSH from the relevant test block target.
12.2 Surface preparation
The test surface is to be free from loose scale and any loose foreign matter, which could interfere with the
test. Shot blasted surfaces covered with a thin coating of spray primer are usually satisfactory, but any
successive layers of paint must be removed and the test surface lightly disc or belt sanded for reproducible
results.
18
12.3 Test blocks
The test block required for partial and/or complete examination is shown in Figure 7. The test block thickness
is to be within ± 10% of the thickness of the tee-butt joint member that is under the probe and is used for the
examination. Alternatively if the standing leg technique, clause 12.5.b), is to be used then Figures 3 and 4
apply for block selection as appropriate.
X = Flat bottom hole 6mm deep, 2.5 mm dia.

for thickness up to and including 50 mm, 3 mm X
dia. for thickness greater than 50 mm
T1 X
T and T1 = Thickness of
continuous members of the
joint ± 10%
T1 T
T1/2
T
X
X
T1
T/2
X
X
T1
Figure 7 Combination Block covering different Weld and Plate Thickness
12.4 Probes
a) Compression wave probes are to be combined double type, of test frequency 4 to 6 MHz. The
transducer area is to be not less than 100 square mm. The transducer size is to conform to clause 7.5a.
NOTE This type of probe is subject to varying response with probe orientation and certain types of defect. To
obviate this feature the acoustic baffle of the probe is to be positioned as follows:
1) Normal to centre line of weld when plotting weld width.
2) Normal to centre line of weld when plotting defect width.
3) Parallel to centre line of weld when plotting defect length.
b) Shear wave probes are to be single or combined double type, of frequency 2 to 4 MHz. The transducer
area is to be not less than 70 square mm. The transducer size is to conform to clause 7.5a. The angle
of refraction is to be 45° degrees.
NOTE The use of probes with refracted angles greater than 45° will be necessary when the examination
method in clause 12.5.b is used and for the examination of weld repairs 12.10.
19
Tee-butt welds may be examined by:

a) Using the surface of the continuous member that is remote to the standing leg and scanning
with compression waves and shear wave probes (complete examination). This is the preferred
method and it is to be used whenever possible.
b) Using both surfaces of the standing leg and the surface of the continuous member that supports
it and scanning with shear waves only. Standing leg technique.
c) Using the surface of the continuous member that is remote to the standing leg and scanning
with a compression wave probe only (partial examination).
NOTE If the standing leg technique is to be used then Figures 3 and 4 apply for test block selection. As
appropriate to the nominal thickness of the standing leg, ±10%, as specified in relevant drawings for
cross-reference.
12.6 Plotting Weld Width
Prior to the weld search using the methods described in clause 12.5, the weld width is to be plotted. Using a
compression wave probe and adjusting the first bottom echo from adjacent plate material to a convenient
height, e.g. 40% FSH. Move the probe slowly towards the weld and mark the weld edge at the probe index
position when this echo reduces to 20% FSH, i.e. 6 dB-drop. This procedure is to be repeated on both sides
of the weld and at intervals along the weld that are not more than twice the thickness of the plate under the
probe. Plot the weld edges directly on to the surface and join the points with a straight line.
NOTE Where excessive deviation from a straight line through the marked points is noticed. This may be an indication
that a weld repair has been undertaken and should be investigated further with a finer plotting interval. In
addition, see clause 12.10.
12.7 Calibration
a) Compression wave probe. Obtain DL and SL (clause 12.1b2) from the relevant test block target,
Figure 7. Both signal amplitude lines are to be identifiable on the display.
b) Shear wave probe. Note the horizontal displacement of the probe index from the test block target at
probe’s half skip distance, or full skip distance if examining from the opposite plate surface.
c) Time-base. The time-base is to be calibrated to a range equal to the combined thickness of the material
and weld under the probe with the probe contact face set at zero when using compression or shear
wave probes.
12.8 Search Sensitivity
a) Compression wave probe. The compression wave search sensitivity is to be established by

using the attenuator values obtained in displaying:
1) a 20% FSH first back-wall echo from an undrilled portion of the test block, A dB
2) a 20% FSH echo from the test block target, B dB
3) a 20% FSH first back-wall echo from the plate material adjacent to the weld to be
examined, C dB
4) The minimum search sensitivity is = C-(A-B) dB
b) Shear wave probe. The shear wave search sensitivity will be established by displaying DL
amplitude from the test block target corner - direct or first bounce depending on the technique to
be used, and increasing this signal by the difference in the attenuator value obtained from
clause 12.8.a).1) and 12.8.a).4), = C-A dB.
20
12.9 Search Scanning
Weld search scanning using compression and shear wave probes is to be a rectilinear scanning pattern with
sufficient traverse to ensure complete examination of the weld section and adjacent plate material. Forward
progression along the weld is not to exceed 90% of the width or diameter of the transducer between each
traverse. For partial examination the forward progression is to be as required by the Design Authority.
12.10 Repairs in tee-butt Welds
a) Where weld repairs have been undertaken to rectify previously reported and unacceptable defects, and
where it has been necessary to gouge into the plate material of the continuous member to affect the
repair, the weld repaired area must be examined with 45° and 60° shear wave probes and a
compression wave probe from the surface of the continuous member that is remote to the standing leg.
b) The extent of the examination of the weld repair is to cover a minimum area extending 25 mm beyond
the edges of the original weld and weld repair, and to extend the length of the examination by 150 mm
at both ends of the weld repair. All adjacent welds within 150 mm from a repair are to be examined by
visual means.
12.11 Defect Indication Measurement
The length and width of all defect indications of signal amplitude 20% FSH and greater are to be measured
using the 6 dB-drop technique. The acoustic baffle of the compression wave probe is to be positioned as
required in clause 12.4.a. The depth of defect is to be measured relative to the surface of the plate material
remote to that under the probe.
12.12 Records
Defect indications of signal amplitude 20% FSH and greater are to be recorded together with their positions,
in relation to known and fixed datum’s, and their dimensions (length, width and/or through thickness height,
and depth), in sufficient detail to apply Def Stan 02-773.
13 Time-of-Flight Diffraction
13.1 Application
a) The Time-of-Flight Diffraction (ToFD) technique is an advanced computer based digital ultrasonic
technique that can be used in a fully automated inspection system or in a semi-automated scanning rig
with positional encoder feedback to the inspection system. The ToFD technique can be used to examine
butt welds in plates, vessels and tubes and for the examination of tee-butt welds to meet the
requirements of Def Stan 02-773. The principles of the technique are described in the informative
Annex B. Guidance on the calibration and setting-up of the ultrasonic ToFD technique is given in BS EN
583 part 6, and in BS EN ISO 10863.
b) The preferred method of application of the ultrasonic ToFD technique is for it to be applied as a single
'stand-alone' process from both surfaces of a butt weld. Where this is impractical, scanning from one
surface is acceptable if the ToFD is used in conjunction with Phased Array (PA) linear scanning of the
near surface and far surface (BWE) Dead Zones.
13.2 Surface Finish
a) The surface that is to be examined is to be free from loose scale, rust, slag and weld splatter or any
other loose foreign matter, which could interfere with the examination. Shot blasted surfaces covered
with a thin coating of spray primer are usually satisfactory, but any successive layers of paint must be
removed and the test surface lightly sanded (disc, belt or emery paper) for reproducible results.
21
b) The surface condition of the weld is to be such that it does not adversely influence the examination;
preparation of the weld surfaces is to be completed consistent with the requirements to carry out
effective ultrasonic examination and accurate interpretation. Depending on the profile and surface
condition, dressing of the weld area may be necessary even when probe contact is only to be made with
parent material. Where ToFD scans, B or D-scans, are to be undertaken that cross the weld the
minimum recommended surface finish is SF3 (see A.3). The weld surface finish should be recorded in
the ultrasonic examination procedure data sheet.
a) The ultrasonic inspection systems that utilises the ToFD technique must, as a minimum, comply with the
requirements of BS EN 12668 Part 1, 2 and 3, and should meet the following requirements.
1) The receiver bandwidth shall have a range between 0.5 and 2 times the nominal probe frequency at
–6 dB. A broadband receiver bandwidth of 0.1 to 30 MHz with a range of user selectable bandpass
filters will cover the majority of applications.
2) The transmitting pulse can be either unipolar or bipolar with a rise time not exceeding 0.25 times the
period corresponding to the nominal probe centre frequency or less than 50 ηs.
3) The system shall have a user selectable electronic gate that is programmable in both start time and
duration (length) within which the unrectified A-scan signal is digitised.
4) The digitisation rate of the unrectified signals shall be at least four times the nominal probe
frequency, e.g. 5 MHz probe centre frequency – 20 MHz digitisation.
5) NOTE A higher digitisation rate gives improved time-of-flight resolution but requires more data
points to be stored. There is a trade-off between resolution and memory/storage but it should always
be biased towards improved resolution.
6) The system shall be capable of signal averaging in user selectable steps, typically 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32
averaging.
7) The system shall be capable of acquiring and digitising the signals at a rate of at least one A-scan
per 1 mm scan length. The movement of the probes and the data acquisition must be synchronised
for this purpose to eliminate lost or missed data during the processing of the scan. The encoder
resolution per mm of scan length should be greater than 4 steps per mm.
8) The system should be capable of displaying the data as parallel (B-scan) or non-parallel (D-scan)
scans in an amplitude related grey scale of at least 64 grey levels.
9) The equipment is to be capable of storing all A-scan, B-scan or D-scan data in the raw collected
state, without data reduction, on a suitable magnetic/optical/electronic storage device and be able to
retrieve this data to reconstitute the ToFD scans.
10) The system display is to be capable of displaying the data, B-scan or D-scan, in a 1:1 representation
of probe movement, i.e. 1 A-scan per mm (scan rate) per 1 horizontal pixel line, and must be able to
scroll through the data file from start to finish.
b) Due to the relatively low signal amplitudes used in the ToFD technique a pre-amplifier is typically
employed. This is placed in line between the receiving probe, as close to it as possible, and the
inspection system. Where a pre-amplifier is employed it must meet the following requirements.
1) The bandwidth (-3 dB) shall be similar to that of the inspection system, e.g. 0.1 to 30 MHz, or at least
provide a flat response over the bandwidth of the transducer.
2) The specified gain should be fixed, switchable gain e.g. between 40 and 60 dB fixed is allowed but
variable gain pre-amplifiers should not be used. The amount of additional external gain is to be
recorded within the ultrasonic procedure sheet.
3) The pre-amplifier must be of a low-noise design, i.e. better than 20 µV peak-to-peak.
22
13.4 Probes
13.4.1 General
The general probe arrangement for the ToFD technique is illustrated in Figure 8. The ultrasonic probes shall
be a linked pair of matched broadband (each probe within 10% of each other’s centre frequency), short pulse
transducers. Each probe should have a standard test certificate which records the pulse profile (time and
frequency), the operating (centre) frequency, the upper and lower –6 dB frequencies and the relative (-6 dB)
bandwidth in accordance with BS EN 12668 Part 2. The relative bandwidth of the transducers should be
greater than 80%, 100% transducers are preferred. Typical pulse profile and frequency spectrum are shown
in Figure 9.
PCS
Tx Rx
LATERAL WAVE
FOCUS DEPTH
PROBE ANGLE
BWE
FOCUS
Figure 8 Ultrasonic ToFD General Probe Arrangement
13.4.2 Probe Wedges
Normally probe wedges shall be a matched pair at an angle between 50° and 60° inclusive, within ±2° or
better, for a compression wave in steel. Wedges of between 45° and 70° may be used. However, it should
be noted that 45° wedges with a wide probe centre separation (PCS) tend to reduce the amplitude of the
Lateral Wave making it difficult to distinguish within the background noise without additional gain, which then
saturates the BWE. Stepper angled wedges, 70°, tend to increase the intensity of the Lateral Wave with a
resulting loss in near surface resolution and a wider Scanning Surface Dead Zone (B.3.1). In exceptional
circumstances (limited access, abnormal geometry, etc.) other angles or a mix of angles may be used, see
Section 15. If this occurs a separate examination work instruction shall be drawn up, illustrating the scans,
coverage and focal points of each ToFD set-up. This work instruction is to be referenced in any report.
PULSE SHAPE SPECTRUM
0.20 us/div 0 - 10 MHz
Figure 9 Typical ToFD Transducer Pulse Shape and Spectrum
23
13.4.3 Wedge Index Points
The index points of all wedges shall be determined by the use of UT Calibration Block No. 1 (BS EN 12223)
and clearly marked on the wedges. The wedge angle and the index point are to be periodically checked and
recorded. The UT Calibration Block No. 1 can also be used to measure the time delay within the wedge
material for each wedge. However, a better method of measuring the probe delay for a pair of ToFD wedges
is to mate both wedges together, index point to index point, and in either through transmission mode or
ToFD mode measure the time-of-flight of the ultrasound pulse through the wedges. The probe delay for a
given pair of ToFD wedges is to be recorded.
13.4.4 Probe Centre Separation
The probe centre separation, PCS, measured between the wedge index points is a function of the probe
angle, the desired focus depth and the plate/butt thickness. The PCS is aimed at achieving the optimum
beam coverage of the weld. In thinner, less than 13 mm, plates/butts the use of 45° wedges and a 1:1 PCS
increases the time-of-flight difference between the Lateral Wave and the BWE, thus improving resolution
compared with higher angled wedges. In plates/butts with a thickness greater than 50 mm the use of at least
two scans with different PCS's is essential to ensure full coverage of the weld volume.
13.5 Probe Selection and Focus Depth
The recommended probe frequency, size, wedge angle and focus depth (beam intersection) for various
plate/butt thicknesses are given in Table 3. PCS look-up tables, with PCS distance (to the nearest 0.5 mm)
and the relevant time-of-flights are given in informative Annex C.
13.6 Sensitivity
a) Having selected the probe frequency, size and wedge angle and set the PCS to give the desired focus
the probes shall be coupled to either a calibration block or the item under test. The calibration block is to
be of the same material, thickness (±10%) and surface finish as the item under examination. The block
is to be large enough to accommodate the full PCS for a focus of 1T (T = plate/butt thickness) at the
selected wedge angle and long enough to allow the capture of a B-scan or a D-scan of at least 150 mm
length. Alternatively the scan can be captured with the probes static and the encoder on ‘free-run’.
Where the item under examination is to be used, the main parent plate (thicker plate) forming the joint
shall be used and the probes positioned on the surface within 200 mm of the joint to be examined.
NOTE If a pre-amplifier is to be used during the examination it has to be used during the sensitivity/calibration
checks.
Table 3 Probe Selection
Plate/butt Probe frequency Probe size Nominal wedge Focus Depth

thickness (mm) MHz ∅ mm angle (T = plate/butt thickness)
≤13 10 – 20 2-3 45° - 70° 1T
>13 to ≤25 5 – 10 2-6 50° - 70° 0.75T or 1T
>25 to ≤50 5 6 - 12 50° - 60° 0.667T
>50 to ≤100 2–5 6 - 12 50° - 60° 0.75T
45° - 60° 0.375T
>100 2–5 12 - 25 55° - 60° 0.8T and 0.5T, and
45° - 60 0.25T
NOTE In thicknesses greater than 100 mm at a focus of 0.25T the use of 45° wedges is recommended.
24
b) On coupling the probes, the electronic settings that control the transmitter pulse HT voltage (typically
100 V to 200 V), the pulse width (typically adjustable over the range of 35 ηs to 500 ηs), and the
bandpass filters (upper and lower filters), are to be adjusted to optimise the Lateral Wave pulse shape
and amplitude, i.e. maximum signal-to-noise ratio with a clear distinct shape and the shortest pulse
length.
c) The sensitivity gain is then set by adjusting the gain to show discernible acoustic grain scatter in the
digitiser scale over the region of interest beyond the Lateral Wave. This is to be at least 6 dB higher than
the amplitude of the electronic noise prior to the arrival of the Lateral Wave. The gain should then be
adjusted to give a Lateral Wave that is between 10% and 40% of the amplitude scale, without over-
saturating the reflected BWE. If the BWE is saturated the gain should be backed off until the BWE is at
100% amplitude, full screen height (FSH), and then re-set to give the desired level of Lateral Wave. The
amount of BWE saturation should be recorded, e.g. X dB above FSH.
NOTE. The use of 45° wedges with wide PCS's will result in weak, even non-existent, Lateral Wave signals. In this
case the gain should be adjusted so that the Lateral Wave is just discernible (3% to 8% FSH); the acoustic
grain noise beyond the Lateral Wave is not greater than 5% FSH, and the BWE is not saturated by more than
18 dB.
13.7 Calibration
a) A calibration scan, B-scan or D-scan, with the examination probe and sensitivity gain settings shall be
undertaken on the item under examination. The scan shall be performed on the main parent plate
(thicker plate) forming the joint or the continuous member across a tee-butt weld. The probes are to be
positioned on the surface within 200 mm of the joint to be examined. The scan shall be at least 150 mm
in length and shall capture the ToFD A-scan data from 1 µs to 2 µs before the Lateral Wave to at least 1
µs after the first mode-converted back-wall echo signal. The plate thickness and/or compression wave
sound velocity shall be determined prior to scanning in accordance with Section 9.
b) Where near surface scans with a focus of ≤0.375T are conducted in accordance with Table 3. The
calibration can be conducted on a test block of the same material with thickness equivalent to 0.4T to
0.5T. This calibration file must then be used to identify and set the relative position, in μs, of the
calibration blocks thickness (Cal-BWE) in the actual scan file. In this case, the captured ToFD A-scan is
to be from 1 µs to 2 µs before the Lateral Wave to at least 1 µs after the indicated BWE in the scan file.
c) The method of controlling the probe movement and method of measuring the distance moved shall be
calibrated in accordance with the prescribed instructions for the equipment in use. It is recommended
that the system be capable of recording one A-scan per millimetre of probe displacement. The scanning
rate, e.g. 'X' A-scans per 'Y' millimetres, is to be recorded, clause 13.9a.
d) It is acceptable to perform a calibration scan on a calibration block as used in clause 13.6a, in which
case the block should contain a perpendicular spark eroded semi-elliptical notch with a vee-tip profile on
the remote surface. The notch should be not less than 60 mm long, 1 mm to 2 mm wide with a 60°
include angle vee-tip and be 0.2T deep (T = plate/butt thickness) at its deepest point. The block is to be
large enough to allow scanning across the notch (B-scan) and scanning along the notch (D-scan). Each
scan is to contain at least 50 mm of uninterrupted BWE signal. An example of the calibration block is
given in informative Annex D.
e) The time-of-flight to the Lateral Wave and the BWE shall be measured from the scan. These values and
the difference between them shall be recorded and used as datum values in the analysis of ToFD scans
taken along undressed butt welds (weld caps proud of the surface), along the weld toe edges and
centre-line of tee-butt welds and in any examination where it is suspected that surface thinning by
grinding has taken place. Where a notched block has been used the ToFD signals from the notch can
be used to confirm flaw sizing routines.
25
13.8.1 Butt Welds
a) The preferred method of examination is for the ToFD technique to be applied from both surfaces of the
butt weld. Where this is impractical, scanning from one surface is acceptable if the ToFD is used in
conjunction with Phased Array linear scanning of the near (scanning) surface and far (BWE) surface
Dead Zones.
b) When Phased Array linear scanning is used with the ToFD technique from one surface of the weld a
ToFD scan-plan and corresponding Phased Array beam-plots are to be produced to determine weld
coverage and to optimise the Phased Array scanning, see Section 15.
c) To ensure full coverage of the weld and to overcome the Back-wall Dead Zone, Annex B.3.2, the non-
parallel D-scans given in Table 4 shall be performed at each focus depth specified in Table 3.
1) The D-scans shall capture A-scan data from 1 µs to 2 µs before the Lateral Wave to at least 1 µs
after the first mode-converted back-wall echo signal. Unless as specified by clause 13.7b), for near
surface focused scans.
2) The D-scans shall follow as closely as possible the line of the weld centre-line. To aid this, the line of
the weld centre-line shall be marked either directly on to the surface or by the use of magnetic guide
strips.
3) If two or more D-scans are required these can be performed individually and the examination
repeated to cover all scans in Table 4 and all focus depths specified in Table 3. Alternatively scans
can be performed simultaneously, if the equipment can collect, process and display data from more
than one ToFD channel (a set/pair of ToFD probes per channel).
4) Any weld axis offset in multi-channel probe arrangements must be known and recorded within the D-
scan data file, e.g. the distance of each probe set from the nominal start of scan position. The D-
scan display should represent the true distance from the start of scan position.
5) For plate thickness less than or equal to 25 mm a scan rate of 1 mm per A-scan is required, above
25 mm a scan rate of not more than 2 mm per A-scan is to be used,
6) To accurately locate and size indications detected by the D-scan(s) it may be necessary to carry out
B-scans across the weld. In which case the B-scan shall be conducted with the same PCS and focus
depth as the D-scan in which the indication has been detected. The weld shall be dressed to at least
SF3 surface finish (Annex A.3).
7) Where the ToFD examination is being used in stand-alone mode, all scans are to be repeated from
the remote surface in order to overcome the Scanning Surface Dead Zone (Annex B.3.1). The weld
coverage, including a minimum of 10 mm each side of the weld for the HAZ, is to be 90% to 98%.
26
Table 4 Butt Weld D-scans
Plate/butt Weld width D-scans and offset Weld width D-scans and offset
thickness (mm) (mm) (mm)
≤13 ≤15 One scan on weld >15 Two scans, 5 mm each
centre-line side of weld centre-line
>13 to ≤25 ≤20 One scan on weld >20 Two scans, 10 mm each
centre-line side of weld centre-line
>25 to ≤50 ≤25 One scan on weld >25 Two scans, 10 mm inboard
centre-line (towards weld centre-line)
from each weld toe
>50 to ≤100 ≤50 Two scans, 10mm >50 Three scans, two 10 mm
inboard (towards weld inboard (towards weld
centre-line) from each centre-line) from each weld
>100 ≤50 >50
weld toe toe, and one along the
weld centre-line
13.8.2 Tee-butt Welds
Ultrasonic ToFD examination is applied to tee-butt welds for the detection and sizing of defects in the weld
fusion face, the root region and at the toes of the tee-butt weld. Defects in the plate and the weld fusion face
may include defects of laminar form, while cracks that penetrate into the plate material may be detected at
the weld toes. At the weld root, slag and lack-of-root fusion type defects are more common. The
examination:-
a) Shall be undertaken from the surface of the continuous member that is remote to the standing leg, with a
scan rate of not more than 2 mm per A-scan.
b) Prior to the examination the weld width is to be plotted in accordance with clause 12.6. Alternatively
ToFD B-scans can be carried out across the tee-butt weld and the location of the weld toes plotted from
these scans. The nominal width of the weld is to be recorded.
c) D-scans shall be undertaken along the plotted weld toes and the tee-butt centre-line as indicated in
Table 5. The recommended focus depth and wedge angle for the thickness of plate forming the
continuous member, Table 5, are to be used in determining the PCS. The Probe frequency and
diameter details given in Table 3 are applicable.
d) Where the weld width differs significantly along the intended length of weld to be inspected, ≥4 mm; this
may indicate previous weld repairs, and additional D-scans along the intended line of the weld toe as
well as along the plotted extremity of the weld toe should be undertaken.
e) The D-scans shall capture A-scan data from 1 µs to 2 µs before the Lateral Wave to at least 1 µs after
the first mode-converted back-wall echo signal, as set in the calibration scan clause 13.7a).
f) To accurately locate and size indications detected by the D-scan(s) it may be necessary to carry out B-
scans across the tee-butt. In which case the B-scan shall be conducted with the same PCS and focus
depth as the D-scan in which the indication has been detected.
27
Table 5 Tee-butt Focus Depth and Wedge Angle Recommendations
Plate thickness, Wedge angle Focus depth Tee-butt weld Required scans
T, (mm) (degrees) (T) width (mm)
≤ 12 Weld toes only
10 ≤ 20 45° - 50° 0.875 - 1.0
> 12 Weld toes plus C/L
20 ≤ 30 50° 0.875 - 1.0
30 ≤ 52 50° - 60° 0.75 - 0.875
52 ≤ 76 60° 0.75
NOTE 1. In thicknesses greater than 76 mm it is essential that a beam plot be undertaken, particularly if the tee-butt
weld is narrow in respect to the plate thickness, to determine beam width and weld toe interaction at these
focal depths.
NOTE 2. Where the tee-butt weld width is narrow, i.e. less than 0.5T of the thickness of the plate forming the
continuous member, 45° wedges can be used with a PCS and focus depth that reduces the signal seen in
the D-scan from the weld toes interacting with the trailing edges of the sound beam.
13.9 Records
a) Defect indications are to be characterised by the following information, in sufficient detail to apply Def
Stan 02-773. Details of the coordinate system in use and scan orientation is given in Figure 10.
1) Position in the weld (x and/or y co-ordinate) from a known datum or by reference to a permanent
feature identified within the ToFD scan,
2) Length and/or width (Δx and/or Δy co-ordinate),
3) Depth and through thickness height (z and Δz co-ordinate),
4) Plate or butt weld thickness, t or T, in mm,
5) Surface breaking crack depth, a, in mm as measured from the surface that the crack is breaking
from, and
6) Type, which is generally limited to "near top-surface" (within 5 mm of scan surface), "near bottom
surface" (within 5 mm of the remote surface) or "embedded" (both indication tips more than 5 mm
from a weld surface). Additional types that can be identified are "Point Reflector(s)", "Surface
Breaking" and "Porosity". Examples of typical ToFD defect images are provided within informative
Annexes E and F. Further flaw characterisation guidelines are provided in Annex B of Def Stan
02-773.
7) For tee-butt examination, defect characterisation will generally be limited to "above weld/plate fusion
face", i.e. from the weld/plate fusion face up to and including 5 mm into the plate material, and
"below weld/plate fusion face", i.e. from the weld fusion face down to and including 5 mm into the
weld material. Where surface breaking toe cracks are detected this should be stated.
28
X
NON-PARALLEL
Tx
D-SCAN
DIRECTION OF PROBE MOVEMENT
Y IS ALONG THE PRINCIPAL AXIS OF
THE WELD IN THE X-DIRECTION
Rx
Z PARALLEL
B-SCAN
DIRECTION OF PROBE MOVEMENT
IS ACROSS THE WELD IN THE
Y-DIRECTION
Figure 10 TOFD Scan coordinates
b) A suitable form of test procedure sheet for ultrasonic ToFD examination is given in Figure 11. This
includes additional information, specific to the ToFD technique, to that asked for in clause 7.1b).
c) Master copies of all set-up and scan files (raw data) shall be kept in electronic format without data
reduction on a suitable magnetic/optical/electronic storage device prior to any data processing for defect
analysis. These master copies are not to be used for data processing.
d) Analysis of the ToFD scans, B-scan or D-scan files, is to be done with the display showing a 1:1
representation of probe movement, i.e. 1 A-scan per mm or the scan rate per 1 horizontal pixel line, with
true 1:1 scrolling.
e) While the collected data will usually contain information in the mode converted shear region after the
reflected BWE, it is acceptable to re-scale the digitised time-scale to display the time-of-flight between
the Lateral Wave and the BWE at as large a scale as possible without artificial magnification.
NOTE The information within the mode-converted shear wave region after the BWE can help in the interpretation of
defect indications and should where necessary be checked as well.
29
Procedure No Issue No Date
Company Procedure drafted by

Approved by
Examination conducted by
COMPONENT DESCRIPTION
Title Contract Order No
Drg No Material
Materials specification Weld type, Butt/T-butt, other
Area Examined
(a) Location: (b) Thickness (plate):

(c) Surface condition: (d) Material velocity:
TECHNIQUE DETAILS
1. Instrumentation
(a) Test instrument: Model/Serial no.

(b) Pre-amplifier: Model/Serial no.
2. Probes and Wedges
(a) Probes: (b) Frequency:
(c) Size: (d) Wedge angle:
(e) Focus: (f) PCS: (g) Probe delay:
3. Sensitivity Calibration
(a) Material velocity: (b) Cal. scan type:
(c) System gain: (d) Pre-amp gain:
Calibration Block:
(a) Material: (b) Thickness:

(c) Notch depth: (d) Length: (e) Width:
4. Scanning details
Directions, surfaces used, coverage.
Diagrams to be used as necessary.
(a) Scan type: (b) Couplant:

(c) Scan rate: i.e. 1 A-scan/mm (d) Scan distance:
(e) Digitisation: (f) Averaging
Calibration file name:
Examination scan(s) file names:
5. Acceptance Standard Specification
6. Supplementary Information
Figure 11 Example of a TOFD Ultrasonic Report data sheet
30
14 Complex Geometry
14.1 Application
a) A 'complex geometry' (CG) butt weld can be defined as a butt weld joint where at least one surface is
non-parallel to its opposing surface and where the cross-sectional profile deviates from that of a simple
butt weld. In many cases, the weld itself will be of a similar designation to that of a more common plain
butt weld; with similar weld preparation angles, root and nose details. The complexity of inspection
results from significant change in plate thickness either side of the weld or close proximity to features
(chamfers, fillets or attachments) which make standard inspection procedures impractical.
b) A 'complex geometry' tee-butt weld can be defined as a tee-butt welded joint in which access to the
inspection surface of the continuous member, clause 13.8.2, is limited or impractical, e.g. back-to-back
cruciform joints, off-set cruciform joints, bulkhead T-joints and nozzle joints etc.
c) Even when access can be gained to both surfaces of the joint (butt weld), it is highly likely that the
preferred method of examination, clause 13.8.1a), cannot be achieved and the ToFD examination must
then be supported by Phased Array linear scanning and surface crack detection techniques.
d) All complex joint examinations of submarine pressure hull welds, components and associated structural
welds are to have approved procedures and scan-plans prior to examination. The scan-plans can be
based on the design drawing but must be reviewed in respect to the actual as-built weld geometry
configuration, to ensure maximum possible coverage of the welded joint and associated heat-affected
zone (HAZ).
14.2 Personnel Requirements

a) In addition to the requirements of clause 7.1, the Examining Authority is to ensure that all personnel
responsible for the examination of 'complex geometry' joints;
1) Hold a minimum of Level 2 certification, clause 7.1d), in Time-of-Flight Diffraction.
2) Have gained MOD(N), approval of butt weld inspection through written procedures with on-site
audits.
3) Have attended a MOD(N) approved Complex Geometry training course and to have proved
competency through examination of test pieces.
4) Be familiar with the development of graphical representation of ToFD beam plots, scan-plans, on the
design/as-built weld geometry, and in the use of proprietary software for the production of scan-plans
and beam plots.
NOTE. Supervised trainees, holding ultrasonic certification and working towards Level 2 certification may assist in the
data collection.
b) Where the examination is limited to one surface only, the above criteria is to apply in respect to Phased
Array.
14.3 Examination Requirements
a) For complex geometry butt welds the guidance on probe selection, Table 3; the required D-scans,
Table 4; are to be applied. The nature of the examination is such that these are only guidelines and
additional scans at similar or even different focal depths will be required. Generally the transition
between thin and thick, plate to insert/penetration, is controlled by a 1:4 taper – nominally a 14° degree
chamfer. This forces a change of at least 10° degrees between the transmitter (Tx) probe and the
receiver (Rx) probe, i.e. 50° to 60° degrees, as illustrated in Figure 12.
b) It is recommended that in setting up the ToFD probe arrangement the transmitter (Tx) probe should be
placed on the thinner parallel plate with the receiver (Rx) probe on the taper or thicker plate.
31
The production of scan-plans are essential and should be done to maximise the percentage coverage of the
weld and HAZ, a minimum 10 mm each side of the weld should be allowed for the HAZ. For stand-alone
ToFD examination from both weld surfaces a percentage coverage of 90% to 98% is required. Where the
examination is limited to one surface and Phased Array linear scanning is being utilised, the ToFD scan-plan
must clearly show the areas not covered by the ToFD scans, so that the Phased Array scans can be
optimised to cover these areas, see un-shaded area of weld in Figure 12 and the PA beam-plot in Figure 13.
Figure 12 Complex Geometry ToFD scan-plan, single sided inspection
Figure 13 Complex Geometry PA beam-plot, single sided inspection
c) The method of examination is generally similar to that of a plain butt weld, clause 13.8. The sensitivity
and calibration of the ToFD set-ups are to be conducted on either a calibration block of similar material
and within ±10% of the thinner plate thickness of the joint under examination, or directly (preferred
method) on the plating adjacent to the weld under examination, in accordance with clauses 13.6 and
13.7.
32
d) It is to be expected that due to the complex geometry the Lateral Wave will be weaker and potentially
intermittent over the scan length. An amplitude as low as 3% to 5% is acceptable if a calibration /
sensitivity scan is done directly on the plating adjacent to the weld, prior to and following the inspection,
and these scans do not record significant differences in signal amplitude.
15 Phased Array
15.1 Application
a) The ultrasonic phased array technique is an advanced computer based ultrasonic technique that can be
used in a fully automated inspection system or in a semi-automated scanning rig with positional encoder
feedback to the inspection system. Currently the phased array technique is utilised as a supplementary
technique to provide pulse-echo coverage of the scanning surface dead zone and the back-wall dead
zone, that are inherent in the ultrasonic ToFD technique. It can be used in conjunction with the ToFD
technique for the examination of butt and tee-butt welds.
b) There may be further applications that utilise the potential of the phased array technique to provide
linear (electronic) scanning, dynamic depth focusing and swept angular (sectorial or azimuthal) scanning
from a single probe or a number of probes. In these cases a full written test procedure that details all
necessary information to describe the technique; set-up, probes, focal laws, weld coverage (beam-
plots), calibration and sensitivity checks shall be submitted to the Design Authority for approval.
c) A general description of the principles of the phased array technique is given in the informative
Annex G.
15.2 Surface Finish
In addition to the requirements of clause 7.8 and Annex A, the physical size of the phased array probes and
wedges are generally much longer than conventional pulse-echo search units and therefore the surface
waviness under the probe's footprint and its scanning path is more critical. The condition of the probe contact
surface of the item to be examined is to be such that satisfactory coupling between the probe and the test
surface can be maintained throughout the scan. The waviness of the test surface shall not result in a gap of
more than 0.5 mm between the probe and the test surface. This is to be achieved by dressing if necessary.
Where scans are to be undertaken cut cross butt welds the minimum recommended surface finish of the butt
weld is SF3 of Annex A (A.4).
a) Phased array equipment is more complex than conventional ultrasonic test instruments. The system has
to handle probes that can have up to 128 elements, each of which can be considered as a separate
ultrasonic transducer, and the system may have to handle two or more phased array probes. A
significant part of this is the computer-controlled excitation of the individual transducer elements in the
probe, to prescribed focal laws, where time delays are measured in nanoseconds. Just as important, is
the computing processing needed to regenerate a return echo into a sensible signal that can be
displayed and interrogated to allow defect sizing. As a minimum the phased array equipment should
comply with BS EN 12668 Parts 1, 2 and 3 where practical.
b) The method of controlling and moving, manually or mechanically, the probes shall include a system to
monitor the movement. This system shall be able to be calibrated without the need of additional
electronic instruments. Calibration of the probe movement shall be done by simply moving the probes a
measured distance across a test block or the item under examination and then adjusting or re-setting an
incremental counter that is directly proportional to the distance moved. The system should be capable of
both positive and negative movement and calibration.
33
15.4 Probes
a) Phased array probes can contain up to 128 transducer elements, arranged in a linear, annular
(doughnut-shaped elements) or a matrix configuration. In a linear array the width of each element can
range from 0.5 mm to 2.5 mm and the element length can be 10 times its width, e.g. typical probes
contain a number (16, 32, 64) of 1 mm x 10 mm elements. Each element can act as a separate
transducer or by pulsing a group of elements various waveforms can be produced. The controlling
sequence of pulses to the individual elements with a group is known as the Focal Law.
b) A basic check of a phased array probe is to couple the probe, without any angled wedge, directly onto
the side face of the calibration block No.1, BS EN 12223, and by firing each element in turn obtain a
BWE (50 or 80% FSH) from the 25 mm dimension. The BWE echoes obtained should be within ±2 dB of
each other for each element. This check should be carried out on a routine basis in accordance with the
periodic checking requirement defined in BS EN 12668 Part 3.
NOTE A probe having a few widely separated elements down, does not necessarily restrict the use of the probe. The
focal law can be modified to take into account the failed element. However, if block of elements have failed
then the probe cannot properly function in either linear scan or sectorial scan mode and should be replaced.
c) Angular wedges used for phased array probes are typically general purpose wedges and are used to
enhance the range of beam angles that can be generated by the phased array to mimic conventional
probe angles. A particular probe/wedge combination only generates useful ultrasound beams over a
limited angular range, which is typically ±15° about the nominal wedge angle. As general purpose units
the wedges may give rise to standing echoes and probe reverberations and careful design of the wedge
and focal laws of the probe are required to reduce these effects.
d) The probe index point and probe angle may be considered irrelevant due to the capability of the
technique to vary the angle and to sweep the index point in accordance with the focal laws applied. It is
essential that the overall system is assessed to ensure that the probe/wedge/focal laws are producing
the desired beam angle or angles and the desired sweep function, linear or sectorial. A method of
characterising the ultrasound beams produced is described in normative Annex H.
15.5 PA Sensitivity Setting
a) It is proposed that the phased array probe/wedge sensitivity settings shall mirror those used for
conventional pulse-echo ultrasonic examination. For this, the calibration block given in Annex H, Figure
H.1, can be used.
1) A 3 mm diameter side drilled hole (SDH) at or near to the limit of the desired beam path, half or full
skip range, is selected and the gain require to set the response from this target to a specific FSH,
e.g. 80%, with a conventional shear-wave probe (of the same nominal beam angle) is noted, e.g. A
dB. The conventional probe having already been calibrated in accordance with either clause 11.4 or
clause 12.8 for butt or tee-butt examination respectively.
2) The characterised phased array probe/wedge is then position on the calibration block, so that the
response from the first focal law is maximised. The gain is then adjusted to give the same FSH as
the conventional probe and the gain noted, e.g. B dB.
3) This process is repeated for at least the centre and last focal laws and the gain required to achieve
the same FSH noted, e.g. C and D dB.
4) The difference in A-B, A-C and A-D should not be more than ±3 dB. If it is, the probe/wedge
characterisation may have to be repeated or probe squinting investigated. Probe squint can occur
from unequal wear on the wedge contact faces, particularly in mechanical driven rigs which generally
always drive the probes in one direction. Wedge contact faces may require light grinding to correct
the squint.
5) The sensitivity shall be set at which ever value of B, C or D is the highest plus 12 dB.
6) 1) to 5) above are to be repeated for each phased array probe and for each nominal beam angle
used in the examination.
34
b) Alternatively the near surface, scanning surface dead zone, PA beam (nominally a full-skip 45° beam)
can be set at TCG(DAC) plus 12 dB off a 3 mm SDH at or near to the limit of the full skip beam path,
plus transfer loss. The remote surface, back-wall dead zone, PA beam (nominally a half-skip 60° beam)
can be set at TCG(DAC) plus 12 dB off a slot, plus transfer loss.
15.6 Butt Weld Examination
a) During the examination of butt welds the phased array probes are used in either automated or semi-
automated scanning rigs as a supplementary technique to the ToFD technique with the aim to provide
coverage of the scanning (near) surface dead zone and the back-wall (remote surface) dead zone in the
ToFD scan.
b) The scanning surface dead zone is nominally covered by a full-skip 45° ± 2° beam, while the back-wall
(remote surface) dead zone is nominally covered by a half-skip 60° ± 2° beam. Both sets of beams are
electronic linear scans (E-Scans) from within the PA probes on each side of the weld. Each probe
generates both the near surface (45° nominal) and remote surface (60° nominal) beams. The actual
angles being determined, to maximise the near and remote surface weld coverage and beam overlap,
from the beam-plots. The arrangement of the probes is illustrated in Figure 14. Scanning is undertaken
along the length of the weld.
ToFD Coverage
45° Beam Coverage
Phased Array
Coverage
60° Beam Coverage
Figure 14 Combined ToFD and Phased Array Butt Weld Examination
35
c) Beam coverage should be sufficient to cover the full width of the weld plus a 10 mm allowance on each
side for the HAZ. Ideally this should be achieved by a single probe from either side of the weld and
should not be less than 90% than the width of the HAZ – weld – HAZ. Multiple beamsets from a single
probe, e.g. 42° and 48° near surface skip beams, are acceptable. The desired overlap between beams
from probe on each side of the weld is 100%, but this should not be less than 90%.
d) Data from each beam angle generated by the phased array probes is to be collected over a specific
length of the sound beam path as described by an individual probe/angle electronic gate.
1) Maximum weld volume coverage;
i) For the nominal 45°, near surface, beams the electronic gate shall commence from half
plate/butt thickness after the first skip and cover up to half plate thickness after the second skip;
ii) For the nominal 60°, remote surface, beams the electronic gate shall commence from half plate
thickness before the first skip to half plate thickness after the first skip. The electronic gate
beam coverage is illustrated in Figure 15.
2) Minimum critical coverage;
i) The weld defect acceptance criteria for thicknesses greater than 15 mm, Def Stan 02-773,
specifies critical zones, from the free weld surface to 5 mm from the surface, on both the near
and remote surfaces. The ToFD scanning (near) surface dead zone can extend down into the
plate/weld by up to 10 mm depending on the probe frequency, diameter and probe angle;
ii) For the nominal 45°, near surface, beams the electronic gate shall commence from 12 mm
below the plate/weld near surface, after the first skip, covering up to 12 mm below the
plate/weld near surface, after the second skip;
iii) For the nominal 60°, remote surface, beams the electronic gate shall commence from 12 mm
above the remote surface before the first skip to 12 mm above the remote surface after the first
skip. The minimum electronic gate beam coverage is illustrated in Figure 15.
Figure 15 PA Minimum critical coverage, butt welds
15.7 Tee-butt Weld Examination
a) During the examination of T butt welds the phased array probes are again used in either automated or
semi-automated scanning rigs. In this examination, they can replace conventional 45° and 60° shear-
wave inspections undertaken from the surface of the continuous member that is remote to the standing
leg.
36
b) The probes are positioned so that the electronic linear scan can provide as full a cover of the weld to
plate fusion face as possible. This may necessitate scanning with one beam angle first and then repeat
scanning with the second beam angle. The electronic gates are to be set to commence from half plate
thickness and are to record sufficient beam path length to cover beyond the distance of the projected
plate fusion zone and into the weld body. Typical probe lay-out and coverage is illustrated in Figure 16.
Figure 16 PA coverage, tee-butt welds
15.8 Records
a) Master copies of all set-up and scan files (raw data) shall be kept in electronic format without data
reduction on a suitable magnetic/optical/electronic storage device prior to any data processing for defect
analysis. These master copies are not to be used for data processing.
b) All focal law data files used in the generation of the sound beams and linear scans for the examination
are to be referenced in sufficient detail so that the sound beams and linear scans can be re-generated at
a later date if required.
c) Analysis of the phased array D-scan files is to be done with the display showing a 1:1 representation of
probe movement, i.e. the scan rate per 1 horizontal pixel line, with true 1:1 scrolling.
d) Defect indications are to be characterised by the following information, in sufficient detail to apply Def
Stan 02-773, in accordance with clause 13.9a).
e) Defect indications are to be cross-referenced against ToFD records where the phased array
examination technique was used to supplement the ToFD technique.
16 Overlay Cladding
16.1 Application
The following requirements apply to the ultrasonic examination of the bond between weld deposited overlay
cladding and the base material. Specific requirements due to special shapes or manufacturing processes will
be given in the appropriate specification or weld procedure.
37
The test surface and reflecting surface are to be free from burrs, loose scale, machining or grinding particles
or other loose foreign material. Surfaces are to be smooth and sufficiently free from waviness to allow a
proper and uniform examination of all areas, at the required sensitivity level.
16.3 Calibration/Test Block
A clad calibration test block is to be prepared using materials similar to those used in the item to be
examined. The test block base material is to be at least 25 mm thick. The metal cladding is to be deposited
using the same welding process and procedure to the same thickness and surface finish as the item to be
examined. A 3 mm diameter flat-bottomed hole is to be drilled through the base material so that the bottom
of the hole forms a reflecting surface at the interface of the base material with the cladding material.
16.4 Probes
Probes are to be twin crystal compression wave of test frequency 2-6 MHz. They are to comply with the
requirements in 7.5.1.
16.5 Sensitivity
The instrument is to be calibrated to display a 20% FSH signal from the test block target.
a) Scanning is to be carried out from the cladding surface and may be performed manually or automatically
by moving the probe in a directed path or by moving the material in a directed path with the probe held
stationary. Scanning speed is to be uniform and at a rate determined during calibration. Where a parallel
back-wall can be used to obtain a back reflection the instrument sensitivity is to be increased to show
the back reflection and thus assure adequate coupling.
b) Manually deposited cladding is to be examined over the entire surface area. Adjacent scans are to be
separated by approximately 80% of the probe crystal width to ensure adequate overlap.
c) Machine deposited cladding is to be examined along grid lines spaced at 50 mm intervals and normal to
the direction of welding. Additionally continuous scanning is to be applied to a width of 50 mm from the
edges of the perimeter of the clad area and penetrations. Continuous scanning is also to be applied to
an area with a minimum radius of 150 mm around any significant defect.
16.7 Procedure Tests
The examination of cladding procedure test samples is to be carried out in accordance with clause 16.6b).
16.8 Records
Defect indications in the cladding are to be compared with the reference standard in clause 16.3 for
assessment. The position of each defect indication in excess of the reference level is to be noted and
explored to determine the area and/or linear dimensions. Records of defect indications are to be sufficiently
detailed to apply the acceptance standard in Def Stan 02-773.
38
17 Brazed Pipe Joints
17.1 Application
The following requirements apply to the ultrasonic examination of capillary brazed joints in piping systems to
assess the area of bond between the pipe wall and coupling fitting. Reference is made to:
1) Insert groove - The groove in the fitting socket prepared to contain the brazing alloy.
2) Land - The portion of the fitting adjacent to and/or between the insert grooves.
The outer surface of the fitting is to be smooth and clean. Filler metal, flux, paint or any other material is to
be removed to provide a satisfactory surface for the examination.
17.3 Probes
Probes are to be combined double compression wave of test frequency 2 - 6 MHz. Selection of probe type
will depend on dimensions of the fitting and the width of lands. In view of the better resolution provided by
focused probes on thin materials, their use is recommended where material thickness allows.
17.4 Calibration
Test pieces are to be typical joint samples or manufactured sections of the same material and geometric
configuration as the production items to be examined. The equipment is to be calibrated to display as distinct
signals the:
1) combined pipe and fitting thickness,
2) fitting thickness in way of the joint, and
3) insert groove depth (if applicable).
The signal positions are to be clearly marked on the instrument display.
17.5 Sensitivity
Sensitivity is to be adjusted to obtain a FSH signal from the combined pipe wall and fitting thickness, i.e. the
bond condition, except for flange joints to which clause 17.6.e refers. For those couplings where the fitting
and pipe wall thicknesses are similar a multiple echo pattern (not less than four) is to be displayed for the
zero-bond condition in the test fitting. The amplitude of any one signal is not to exceed FSH. The
assessment of the condition of bond or no- bond is to be made with due regard to the complete trace pattern.

a) Recording is to proceed in parallel with the examination and to the requirements in clause 17.7a) and
17.7b).
b) The acoustic barrier of the probe is to be placed parallel to the longitudinal axis of the pipe and clear of
the insert groove. Scanning is to be continuous; moving the probe steadily in a circumferential path
without reversing until the scan of each division as marked (17.7a and 17.7b) has been completed.
c) Where possible the probe crystal is to be of a size that allows the joint to be fully scanned in a number of
passes without overlap. Where only one pass scanning is possible the probe edge is to be held close to
the filler metal groove edge during the scan.
d) Fittings without insert grooves are to be scanned as a single land joint.
39
e) Flange joints may be satisfactorily examined using the inner surface of pipes depending on the size of
probe available. The calibration procedure will be similar to that for sleeved joints, i.e. successive
echoes from the pipe wall thickness will indicate zero bond. Bond condition will be indicated by the
absence of the pipe wall echoes or by their attenuation. The distance between the pipe inner wall and
the outer radius of the flange may be too great to be shown in the display. Search sensitivity is to be set
to show three reflections from the zero-bond condition with the amplitude of the first not exceeding FSH.
To ensure proper contact with the inner surface of the pipe, shaping of the probe may be necessary.
This must be carried out with care to avoid spurious signals and possibly confused interpretation. The
recording procedure is to be as for sleeved joints.
f) Hexagonal type fittings are to be examined by scanning the centre of each flat. The percentage bond for
the joint is to be assessed by averaging the results obtained.
17.7 Records
a) The use of tape as a means of recording as the examination proceeds is recommended, but the use of
alternative recording methods which can be demonstrated and result in a comparable record are not
excluded. Before commencing the examination apply a band of removable adhesive tape to the pipe
adjacent to the fitting. Mark the tape to show equal divisions not exceeding 25 mm circumferentially in a
clockwise direction as viewed from the pipe facing the fitting. Permanently mark the 12 o'clock position
on the fitting by etching, and mark the position on the tape. As the examination proceeds the tape is to
be marked to show:
1) The extent and percentage bond as determined by the difference in bond and zero-bond signal
amplitudes for each division of each circumferential scan. Typical examples are shown in
Figure 17;
2) 'Not Tested' areas marked NT, i.e. areas which cannot be examined due to inaccessibility;
3) 'No Ultrasonic Penetration' areas marked NUP, i.e. areas which cannot be examined due to fitting
material characteristics and spurious signals;
4) The number of circumferential scans on fittings without insert grooves;
5) The relative positions of lands, i.e. outer, middle, inner, where insert grooves are a joint feature.
b) For each joint examined the information recorded on the tape is to be transferred to a permanent record.
The percentage bond assessment of each circumferential scan will be the average of the percentage
bond figures established for each division. The percentage bond of the joint will be assessed by
averaging the percentage figures established for each circumferential scan. The final figure is to be
stated to the nearest whole number.
18 Pipes and Tubes
18.1 Application
The following requirements apply to the examination of pipes and tubes for the detection of transverse and
longitudinal discontinuities.
18.2 Calibration
A convenient length of pipe or tube of the same material and cross sectional dimensions as that to be
examined is to contain notch type targets, and is to be used as a calibration standard. For transverse type
defects an internal and external notch is to be cut to the dimensions given in 8.6a) except that the notch may
extend wholly around the circumference. The notches are to be separated by at least 40 mm and located to
permit calibration when the probe is positioned between the pipe or tube end and the nearest notch. For
longitudinal type defects an internal and external notch is to be cut to the dimensions given in 8.6a) parallel
with the axis of the pipe. The notches are to be separated by at least 30 mm in a longitudinal direction. Each
notch is to be clearly identifiable on the oscilloscope display. The positions of the internal targets are to be
marked on the pipe or tube outer surface.
40
18.3 Probes
Probes are to be shear wave and are to meet the requirements in 7.5a). The test frequency selected is to be
compatible with the material type and the wall thickness to be examined for the clear resolution of each
calibration target under production conditions.
Pipes and tubes are to be scanned parallel to the longitudinal axis for the detection of transverse defects,
and in a transverse direction for the detection of longitudinal defects by advancing the probes assembly as
the pipe or tube is rotated in such a way that the entire volume of the pipe wall is examined. The speed of
pipe or tube rotation is to be reasonably uniform and at a rate consistent with the maximum rotational speed
of the calibration standard that enables clear and definite resolution of the notch being presented. This speed
is not to be exceeded. Scanning may also be performed by rotating the part and automatically indexing the
probes assembly so that crystal overlap of at least 10% is obtained on each successive pass. When the
immersion method is used the examination conditions are to duplicate the calibration conditions as regards
to probes assembly alignment and wet or dry tube bore conditions. In general the exclusion of the immersion
fluid from the bore improves the reproduction of the examination results. Each pipe is to be continuously
scanned.
18.5 Records
The location extent and signal amplitudes of all indications in excess of the agreed sensitivity level are to be
recorded.
Figure 17 Typical A-scan Displays
41
19 Pipe or Tube Wall Thickness Measurement
19.1 Application
The following requirements apply to the examination of pipe or tube to determine wall thickness at the probe
contact position. The method will not detect pinholes.
The test surfaces are to be free from loose scale, rust and any other foreign matter, which could interfere
with the examination.
19.3 Equipment
The requirements of clause 9.1 are to apply.
19.4 Probes
Compression wave probes suitable for the purpose are to be used. These may be single or combined double
types. The frequency is to be compatible with the material type and thickness of the pipe or tube to be
examined. The probe size selected for the examination of pipes or tubes that are in service will depend upon
the configuration of the pipe or tube and the cross sectional dimensions.
19.5 Calibration
The requirements in clause 9.1 and 9.2 are to apply.
Each end is to be examined by turning the pipe through one full revolution with the probe at the end;
additional scans are then to be made at intervals not exceeding 900 mm along the entire length of the pipe
unless otherwise specified. In-service pipes and tubes are to be examined in accordance with the applicable
requirements of survey with particular attention to inner and outer radii of bends. The use of a probe holder
to hold the probe normal to the pipe surface during in-service examinations is recommended. In all cases,
areas where the wall thickness approaches minimum tolerance are to be subjected to a complete search to
determine the extent.
19.7 Records
Records are to provide for the positive identification of the pipe or tube, material type, coverage given and
the location of areas where the wall thickness approaches minimum tolerance or otherwise as specified in
the Contract Documents.
20 Forgings - including Forged, Extruded and Wrought Bars
20.1 Application
The wide variety of forgings in respect of material type, size and geometry required by the Design Authority
prevents the formulation of rigid ultrasonic examination procedures for general application. Specific
procedures must take into account the material type and grain size, material attenuation factors, method of
manufacture, and the type, location and probable distribution of defects likely to be encountered. In the
examination of non-ferrous bar, detection of sub-surface defects is limited by the relationship between
material grain size (approximate diameter); the wavelength of the ultrasonic energy and the size of the
smallest detectable defect. Since the diameter of the smallest detectable defect will equate to one
wavelength of the energy, and the reduction in ultrasonic frequency to overcome grain size problems will
mean an increase in the size (width) of the smallest detectable defect. Ultrasonic test of non-ferrous bar may
only be practical, where attenuation through the material does not preclude the use of reflection techniques,
42
and may only be meaningfully used for quality purposes where the maximum width of acceptable defect is
not less than those related to the diameter of the horizontal target holes in Figure 18. Bars may contain
defects of width less than the minimum acceptance standard which may not be detected and which could
extend throughout the length of the bar. Diagnosis of defect indications in thick sections demands an
accurate knowledge of probe characteristics. For the examination of steel forgings, excluding austenitic, BS
EN 10228 is to apply. For forgings to which BS EN 10228 cannot be applied, and extruded and wrought
bars, the following clauses apply.
25mm
T/2
6mm
6mm
T
#
38mm min
T = Thickness to be tested ± 10%
# = The block may be cut to this line to facilitate drilling where a
single block is required for use. Alternatively a number of
separate reference blocks may be employed.
Figure 18 Forging Reference Standard Block
The condition of the test surface and the reflecting surface is not to cause interference with the examination.
Surfaces are to be free of loose scale, paint or other foreign matter. Rough-machined surfaces are to be
reduced using a broad-nosed tool to produce a regular smooth surface to avoid spurious indications and
excessive wear of the probe face.
20.3 Probes
Probe selection will depend on the geometry of the item to be examined, material type and grain size, and
the area of probe contact surface. The best near surface resolution will be obtained using combined double
compression wave probe and this characteristic is of value in the examination of areas subject to subsequent
machining. Generally the probe test frequency will be in the range 2 – 6 MHz but a lower frequency may be
necessary to overcome the effects of material large grain structure and long beam path length. Shear wave
probe techniques are to be used where specified. On bored items where the bore is inaccessible for
examination with a compression probe an appropriate shear wave technique is to be used. Shear wave is
also to be used to cover areas where the shape of the item prevents comprehensive examination by
compression wave.
20.4 Calibration
a) The reference standard Figure 18 and Table 6 is to apply. The reference standard is to be wide enough
to permit sound transmission to the flat bottom holes without side effects and is to be ultrasonically free
from obvious defects. It is to be of similar material to that being tested and the surface finish is to be
comparable to the test surface and of similar contour. The bottom of the flat bottom holes are to be
parallel to the entrant surface. The equipment is to be set to show a minimum echo of 20% Full Screen
Height from each hole within the thickness to be inspected. Effectively creating a DAC from the three
holes.
43
b) The attenuator values obtained from the adjustment of sensitivity to give 20% FSH signal amplitude
from the back-wall of the reference standard, each of the flat bottomed holes and the back-wall from the
material under examination are to be recorded and used to derive the minimum search sensitivity by the
method of 8.4a 4), 5). and 6).. Sensitivity is to take account of local attenuation factors and the depth of
defect in the material when defect is evident.
c) Where shear wave examination of rod or bar is stipulated a reference standard containing a hole drilled
on the horizontal axis will be required. The first direct corner reflection from the hole at the end face of
the block is to be used in setting the sensitivity.
Table 6 Forging Reference Block Details
Material Thickness to be Diameter of FBH Diameter of

examined (mm) (mm) horizontal hole (mm)
Steel Up to and incl. 25 1.5

Over 25 to and incl. 60 2.5
Over 60 to and incl. 100 3.5 -
Over 150 6.0
Phosphor Bronze Up to and incl. 50 1.5

Over 100 4.0
Non-Ferrous Up to and incl. 50 1.5

Over 200 4.5
Hiduron Up to and incl. 50 1.5 1.5

Over 50 to and incl. 100 2.5 2.5
Over 100 3.0 3.0
Wherever possible forgings are to be examined from surfaces so arranged such that three major faces are
covered. The technique is to assure the detection of defects that are parallel to and normal to the principal
axes. Defect areas and suspect areas disclosed under these conditions are to be further evaluated from the
surface opposite that used for their initial detection. Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents
the search unit is to be moved in parallel paths. Each path is to overlap the previous and adjacent path by
10% of the width of the transducer. The test frequency is to be the same as the calibration frequency. This
procedure is to be repeated on all examining surfaces. Items of irregular section may require the preparation
of a series of examination techniques for effective coverage.
20.6 Records
The size and location of all defect indications causing reflectivity of 20% FSH (DAC) and greater are to be
located, sized and recorded and marked on the item as the examination progresses. Sizing in accordance
with BS EN 10228; i.e. 6 dB-drop, 20 dB-drop or 'maximum amplitude' as agreed in Contract Documents.
Additionally in the examination of non-ferrous bars or rods the location of indications causing reflectivity of
5% -20% FSH (DAC -12 dB to DAC) are to be recorded. Records are to be sufficiently detailed to apply the
relevant acceptance standard or as defined in the Contract Documents.
44
21 Castings
21.1 Application
The application of ultrasonic methods to the examination of ferrous and non- ferrous castings requires the
use of techniques that will enable defect assessment for the proper application of the acceptance standard. It
is to be recognised that no single technique will suit all applications and also that the casting material type
and surface condition may inhibit useful and economical application. The requirement to discriminate
between defect types and their varying degrees of severity in respect of area and volume etc., and their
position in the material will demand exacting techniques. In view of the apparent difficulties, the MOD will
require the validity of ultrasonic techniques to be confirmed by radiographic examination of selected areas of
castings where both examination methods can be usefully employed.
21.2 Surface Condition
The condition of the test surface and the reflecting surface is to permit effective ultrasonic examination using
the approved procedure. Shot blasted surfaces will improve probe coupling efficiency. Rough-machined
castings may require further preparation to provide a flat smooth surface to avoid spurious signals and
excessive wear of the probe face.
21.3 Probes
The choice of probes will be influenced by the casting material, geometry and the type of defects to be
detected. The use of both compression wave and shear wave probes may be necessary in defect
assessment (clause 20.3 will apply}.
21.4 Calibration
Reference blocks as required are to be prepared from sound material and to conform to the requirements in
clause 7.6.
a) It will first be necessary to establish that the material grain structure and surface finish permit adequate
ultrasonic transmission for the proper examination of the area required. Each area will need to be
checked for this purpose by observing the back-wall response using a compression wave probe or a
corner reflection using a shear wave probe.
NOTE In the 'as-cast' condition the grain size of the material is large. Where the grain diameter approaches ultrasonic
wavelength high attenuation will occur. In the heat-treated condition the grain structure is refined with a
subsequent reduction of attenuation.
b) The compression wave search sensitivity level is to be as high as possible and consistent with
acceptable levels of reflections from material grain. Evidence of defect is to be cause for adjustment of
sensitivity before attempting assessment, by taking account of its position below the surface and
attenuation effects, and local probe transfer losses. Assessment of defect severity may necessarily
combine amplitude and attenuation methods for different defect types. Areas that cause the back-wall
echo to reduce to 20% FSH and less with no evidence of reflecting defect are, after a check of local
surface condition and coupling, to be marked on the casting as 'attenuating defect areas' as the
examination progresses for subsequent inclusion in the record of test.
21.6 Assessment of Defects
The assessment of defect types and their severity as required for the proper application of the acceptance
standards Def Stan 02-745 or Def Stan 863 may necessarily require radiographic examination of the areas
concerned to confirm or determine their acceptability.
45
22 GRP
22.1 Application
The application of ultrasonic methods to the examination of glass (fibre) reinforced plastic (GRP) composite
material requires the use of techniques that will enable the detection and mapping of delamination(s) within
the Royal Navy's GRP structures.
NOTE The same probes, calibration and examination method can be used on Carbon fibre reinforced polymer
(CFRP) composite material.
22.2 Surface condition
The surfaces are to be free of dirt and foreign material that would impede the transmission of the ultrasound.
It is not always necessary to remove the paint. The smooth above waterline hull paint coating actually aids
scanning. The anti-slip deck paint and the anti-fouling coatings below the waterline may have to be dressed
or removed in order to achieve a smooth surface that allows scanning. It is important that the ultrasonic
couplant (paste or gel) be applied to the surfaces and allowed to soak/wet out for 5 to 10 minutes prior to
scanning.
22.3 Probes
The probe shall be a rubber faced (impedance matched) large diameter, 25 mm minimum, low frequency
0.5 MHz single crystal compression wave probe. Probes of this type are commonly known as delay line or
zero interface probes. The zero interface technique is achieved by acoustically matching the soft delay line
and the composite material under test. Thus, when coupled to the composite the delay line/composite
interface is nearly transparent.
22.4 Calibration
22.4.1 A digital ultrasonic test set with direct readout of thickness is to be used. A reference block within
±10% of the thickness appropriate to the GRP under test, e.g. hand lay-up woven roven and/or SCRIMP
material, should be used to calibrate the inspection instruments time-base and to zero the delay
line/composite interface. If a block is not available then the following values of bulk longitudinal sound
velocity are to be used.
• Hand lay-up woven roven, 2700 m/sec.
• SCRIMP panels, 3100 m/sec.
NOTE Where CFRP is being inspected a typical bulk longitudinal sound velocity is 3750 m/sec.
22.4.2 The probe is zeroed by adjusting the probe zero delay to compensate for the time delay in the
rubber. Thus bring the delay line/composite interface to zero and allowing direct readout of shell thickness or
depth to a delamination. If a reference block is being used the sound velocity can be adjusted to align the
indicated thickness with the actual measured thickness of the block. The time base is to be adjusted to
display a minimum of 1.5 times the nominal thickness (see clause 22.5c) of the shell under examination.
46
a) The examination relies on basic A-scan representation with the operator checking for fluctuations in the
signal amplitude, appearance of echoes in front of the back-wall echo (BWE) or movement of the BWE
in the thickness range. The search sensitivity shall be set to give 100% Full Screen Height (FSH) from
the first BWE from the hull/shell in a mid-bay area free from any internal fittings. Due to the nature of
GRP regular adjustments may be required to accommodate material attenuation.
b) The examination involves scanning the inspection area in a rectilinear pattern, not exceeding one probe
diameter per traverse, while marking the boundaries (6 dB-drop technique) of the internal stiffeners
(frames, bulkheads, fitting brackets) directly on to the hull/shell. The reinforcement of internal stiffeners
will be seen as an increase in thickness of the BWE. Debonding of the stiffener reinforcement will most
likely be identified by omission, e.g. only detecting the hull/shell thickness instead of the additional
thickness of the reinforcement. Delamination of the hull/shell laminate will be detected as an echo that
appears in front of the BWE. If the delamination is open, e.g. faces not in contact, and larger than the
probe diameter the BWE will be lost. If the delamination is closed, sound can still be transmitted from
one face to the other and a reduced amplitude BWE will be observed.
c) Unlike metallic vessels it is common to find that the shell thickness in GRP is defined in terms of the
number of plies used to form the laminate rather than as a true dimension. For guidance it can be taken
that 1 ply of woven roven is approximately 0.8 mm thick and that 1 ply of SCRIMP is approximately 0.6
mm thick. So a 20 ply woven roven is approximately 16 mm while the same 20 plies in SCRIMP is
approximately 12 mm.
22.6 Records
All indications greater than 50 mm diameter or greater than 3000 mm2 with a minor dimension more than
30 mm are to be recorded and reported. The size of delamination and the extent of debonding are to be
measured using the 6 dB-drop technique. The depth to the delamination is to be recorded. Assessment of
the defect is to be made by reference to Def Stan 02-752.
47
Annex A
Weld Surface Finish and Limitations
(normative)
A.1 Introduction
A.1.1 The surface finish of the weld and that of the adjacent parent plate material plays an active role on
the level of examination that can be achieved. In addition to being free from foreign matter that is likely to
interfere with probe coupling. BS EN ISO 17640 states that: "Waviness of the test surface shall not result in a
gap between the probe and the test surface greater than 0.5 mm." This is to be achieved by dressing if
necessary. Local variations, e.g. along the edge of the weld, that may result in a gap of up to 1 mm beneath
the probe can be allowed, only if at least one additional probe angle is employed from the affected side of
the weld.
A.1.2 This Annex provides a more practical guideline for linear butt welds. The decision to dress the weld
to one of the four classes of surface finish described may be specified within the Contract Document,
particularly for critical or high stressed welds. However, it might be necessary to dress the weld following
preliminary examination in order to ensure full coverage, critical flaw sizing and/or transverse flaw detection
and sizing. In this case attention should be paid to the joint geometry, its thickness, access and to the
implications of the acceptance criteria on detection and sizing accuracy. The classes are illustrated in
Figure A.1.
A.1.3 For all classes, the surface roughness, Ra, of both the scanning surface and the surfaces from which
the sound beam is reflected is not to be greater than 6.3 μm for machined surfaces and not greater than
12.5 μm for shot-blasted surfaces.
A.1.4 While class SF1 and SF2 may be sufficient in many circumstances it is recommended that SF3 be
the minimum quality for welds greater than 75 mm in thickness or where the width of the weld cap is equal to
or greater than the weld thickness.
A.2 Surface finish, SF1: Undressed
A.2.1 Profile
No dressing is required except where necessary to remove the source of any confusing spurious ultrasonic
signals from the weld cap.
A.2.2 Limitations
a) The lower part of the weld and heat affected zone (HAZ) can be examined by half-skip techniques. The
remainder can be examined by full-skip techniques or by half-skip scanning from the lower surface.
b) The weld and HAZ cannot be examined with compression probes, due to the undulating surface of the
weld cap.
c) Echoes from the weld cap in shear may prevent the detection of flaws in or near the weld surface.
d) Detection of transverse flaws is difficult as the probe cannot be placed directly on the weld.
e) Scanning for transverse flaws has to be done at the shallowest possible oblique angle to the weld, in
both directions from both sides of the weld.
48
A.3 Surface Finish, SF2: Partially dressed to a smooth profile
A.3.1 Profile
The weld cap is dressed to a smooth profile, substantially flat across the centre of the weld cap. It is not
required to dress the cap flush with the parent plate material.
A.3.2 Limitations
a) Less restrictive than the undressed condition, top and bottom of the weld can be examined by half-skip
techniques. However, complete half-skip coverage is limited by the step at the edges of the weld. These
areas can be examined by full-skip techniques or by half-skip scanning from the lower surface.
b) The detection of near surface weld flaws is improved due to the smooth profile that reduces spurious
indications.
c) The majority of the weld body and HAZ can be examined with a compression probe placed on top of the
weld. Complete coverage is however, restricted by the steps at the edges of the weld.
d) The detection of transverse weld flaws is less restrictive, shear wave probes can be place on top of the
weld and scanned across most of the weld cap.
A.4 Surface Finish, SF3: Partially dressed to a near-flat profile
A.4.1 Profile
The weld cap is dressed essentially flat and blended smoothly into the adjacent parent plate, in order that
probes can be scanned across the HAZ on to the weld metal without loss of coupling.
A.4.2 Limitations
a) The full weld can be examined by half-skip techniques, possible slight reduction of test sensitivity and
sizing accuracy at areas where deviations in flatness occur.
b) The weld body and HAZ can be examined with a compression probe placed on the top of the weld,
virtually no limitations.
c) Examination of the weld for transverse flaws is possible by half-skip techniques, even full-skip if both
weld surfaces are dressed. This is the preferred method of scanning for transverse flaws.
A.5 Surface Finish, SF4: Fully dressed to a flat profile
A.5.1 Profile
The weld cap and if necessary the adjacent parent plate are dressed flat and smooth to a high standard that
allows probes to be scanned across the surface without the loss of coupling.
A.5.2 Limitations
No limitations. This surface finish allows the highest standard of examination, detection and flaw sizing and
is therefore typically reserved for critical defect assessment/analysis on a case by case basis and/or for
critical highly stressed welds or components.
49
SF1: Undressed SF2: Partially dressed to a smooth profile
SF3: Partially dressed to a near flat profile SF4: Fully dressed
Figure A.1 Surface finish classes
50
Annex B
Ultrasonic ToFD Technique
(informative)
B.1 General
B.1.1 The basic probe arrangement for the ToFD technique is a pair of short pulse, broad band,
compression wave transducers housed on a matched pair of angled wedges, as illustrated in Figure B.1.
Typically the wedges are set to give an angle between 50° and 60° inclusive for a compression wave in
steel, in accordance with Snell's law and below the first critical angle (27.6° in perspex). The probes
(transducer/wedge) are set facing each other in a tandem configuration, one as a transmitter (Tx) and the
other as a receiver (Rx). They are set a known distance apart, the Probe Centre separation (PCS), between
their index points. The index points having been determined by the use of UT Calibration Block
No. 1 (BS EN 12223).
PSD
Tx Rx
LATERAL WAVE
DIFFRACTED WAVES
BWE
Figure B.1 Basic ToFD configuration
B.1.2 The ToFD technique relies on flooding the area of interest with ultrasound, the interaction of the
ultrasound with the extremities of a flaw and the resulting diffracted waves radiated from the tips.
B.1.3 At the transmitter a surface wave known as the Lateral Wave is generated along with a wide angle
compression wave sound beam which impinges on any discontinuity and is reflected from the remote
surface as a back-wall echo (BWE). A shear wave beam is also produced but as this travels at approximately
half the speed of the compression wave this is generally ignored.
B.1.4 As the Lateral Wave, which travels just beneath the top surface at a slightly (approximately 1%)
slower speed than a compression wave in the material, has the shortest distance to travel it arrives at the
receiver first. If there were no discontinuities the next signal to arrive would be the BWE which although still
travelling at the compression wave velocity (typically 5,850 – 5,930 m/sec) has the longest beam path
between the transmitter and the receiver. Any flaw lying between the top and remote surfaces will therefore
be seen as an echo or set of echoes after the Lateral Wave and before the BWE. The diffracted wave from
the upper tip of the flaw will arrive at the receiver before the diffracted wave from the lower tip of the flaw, as
illustrated in Figure B.2.
51
B.1.5 If the time-of-flight of the Lateral Wave, the BWE and the flaw tip diffracted signals are measured
accurately then the depth of the discontinuity and its through thickness height can be determined. This is
usually performed by the software within the inspection system. Equations to calculate the depth of the flaw
from the top surface are given in BS EN 583-6. These equations are based on either direct measurement of
the time-of-flight of the flaw tip diffracted signals (care must be taken to properly account for the probe delay)
or by reference to the time difference between the Lateral Wave and the flaw tip diffracted signal. An
alternative utilises the time difference, TBWE, between the reflected BWE and the Lateral Wave, in
conjunction with, TF, the time difference between the Lateral Wave and the flaw tip diffracted signal, and the
measured/calibrated plate thickness, t, in the following expression.
⎢⎣ ⎜⎝ S + t ⎟⎠ − 0.5c (TBWE − TF )⎥⎦ − S

2
⎡⎛ 2 ⎞ ⎤
d = 2 2
Where S is equal to half of the probe centre separation, c is the compression wave sound velocity (as
measured directly on the object under test) and d is the distance to the flaw tip from the top surface.
BWE
LOWER TIP
UPPER TIP
LATERAL WAVE
TIME (us)
AMPLITUDE
Figure B.2 A-scan record from embedded flaw
B.1.6 The illustration in Figure B.2 is representative and there will be a phased shift between the Lateral
Wave and the BWE, between the Lateral Wave and the upper tip of the flaw and between the upper and
lower tips of the flaw. This is clearly shown in the D-scan in Figure B.3. Importantly the ToFD technique does
not rely on signal amplitude, it is unaffected by the flaw slope/orientation and it is not necessary to be
perpendicular to the plane of the flaw for detection and sizing, i.e. it has a wide angular tolerance.
B.2 Scan Types and Surface Finish
B.2.1 When utilised for flaw detection and general sizing it is common to have the probes sitting astride
the weld centreline, as illustrated in Figure B.4, with the direction of probe travel along the weld in what is
known as a non-parallel scan. Now more commonly referred to as a D-scan. The un-rectified signals
received by the receiver are digitised and stored as A-scans. As the probes are moved, A-scans are
captured at a given rate, typically 1 A-scan per mm of travel, until the end of the scan. The A-scan data is
processed and displayed as a grey-scale image. This usually takes place in real-time and the operator can
watch the D-scan being generated as the scan progresses. The grey-scale should have a minimum of 64
levels. The D-scan is effectively a side elevation cross-section. However, it is a composite 2-dimensional
image of all the indications within the ultrasound beam. An example of a D-scan is shown in Figure B-3.
52
Top Surface Breaking Flaw

Lateral Wave
Embedded Flaw
Phase Change
BWE
Figure B.3 ToFD D-scan
NON-PARALLEL SCAN
DIRECTION OF PROBE
MOVEMENT IS ALONG THE
PRINCIPAL AXIS OF THE WELD
IN THE X-DIRECTION
D-SCAN
PARALLEL SCAN
Tx Rx
DIRECTION OF PROBE
MOVEMENT IS ACROSS THE
WELD IN THE Y-DIRECTION
B-SCAN
X
Y
Figure B.4 ToFD Scans
53
B.2.2 To achieve good records from a D-scan it is essential that the plate surfaces either side of the weld,
are free from all dirt, foreign material and weld splatter that would interfere with coupling. The surface should
also be smooth, flat and even. However, the ToFD technique can accommodate some unevenness, even
pitting, with the loss of the Lateral Wave while still capturing the diffracted flaw signals and the reflected
BWE. In this mode of scanning it is not essential to dress the weld cap unless it encroaches directly into the
probe contact area.
B.2.3 To obtain more accurate critical flaw sizing and/or to develop flaw plots in order to locate flaws
within the weld, the probes should be moved from the plate on one side of the weld to the plate on the other
side across the weld. This type of scan, although perpendicular to the axis of the weld, is known as a parallel
scan as the direction of movement is parallel to the sound beam. This produces a transverse cross-section
image that is more commonly referred to as a B-scan. This type of scanning can when applied to the surface
of the continuous member that is remote to the standing leg, be used to measure the width of the tee-butt or
fillet weld or the width of any un-fused land beneath the fillet weld.
B.2.4 In butt welds as the probes need to transverse across the weld cap, it is essential that the cap is
dressed to a surface finish of at least SF3, Annex A.
B.3 Limitations
B.3.1 Scanning Surface Dead Zone
B.3.1.1 The scanning-surface dead zone is due to the time occupied by the short pulse envelope forming
the Lateral Wave. As the time-scale is not a direct linear measure of depth below the surface the pulse
length of even a short pulse, 2 ring, wave packet can be the equivalent of 8 mm in the depth range.
Thankfully if there is a surface breaking defect on the scanning surface this will break the Lateral Wave and
its lower tip will be evident, as seen on the right-hand side of Figure B.3. If the flaw is near surface but not
surface breaking there should still be distortion of the Lateral Wave but it is impossible to resolve and size
the flaw.
B.3.1.2 To overcome this limitation higher frequency transducers or lower probe angles (45°) with a closer
PCS can be used. Higher frequency transducers reduced the size of the pulse envelope while the lower
probe angle with an associated closer PCS expand the time resolution near surface. There is still a dead
zone and the only practical way to remove this is to repeat the ToFD scan from the remote surface.
B.3.2 Back-wall Dead Zone
B.3.2.1 The back-wall dead zone is a combination of two separate effects. The first is similar to that of the
scanning surface dead zone, in that the BWE signal has to occupy a given time and flaw signals may be
masked by it. This is relatively small and it has been found that flaws of 0.5 mm depth from the remote
surface can be detected when positioned directly in the centre of the ToFD probe set-up.
B.3.2.2 The second effect is a function of the PCS, the weld thickness and the width of the weld,
particularly in a double-side vee preparation joint. The time-of-flight for a tip diffracted signal and for the
reflected BWE signal is ellipsoid as illustrated in Figure B.5. The PCS typically forms the major axis of the
ellipse with a minor axis of twice the thickness at the centre of the PCS. The three beam paths shown in
Figure B.5 all have the same time-of-flight. A dead zone therefore exists at the extremities of the weld on the
remote side, which is compounded by the BWE time envelope. Depending on the geometry, weld width and
PCS, a dead zone in the order of 2 to 3 mm depth could exist in one of the more important regions of the
weld, the heat-affected zone (HAZ), and HAZ cracking may go undetected until it breaks through the BWE
time-of-flight and even then it would be under-sized.
B.3.2.3 The solution to this, is to either perform B-scans (parallel scans) across the weld or to perform
overlapping offset D-scans, which reduce or eliminate the dead zone. Overlapping offset D-scans have the
advantage in that they are sufficient for accurate determination of flaw depth, length and orientation within all
of the ToFD scan volume not just at the BWE interface.
54
PSD
Tx Rx
LATERAL WAVE
Figure B.5 Back-wall Dead Zone
B.4 Pre and Post Processing

There are a number of post processing tools and one essential pre-processing tool that any ultrasonic ToFD
system should provide, these are;
a) Pre-processing
Signal averaging. It is essential that the system is capable of performing signal averaging of the A-
scan data. This collects data from a number of A-scans, sums the amplitude at each digitised point
along the signal and then stores the average data in order to develop the B or D-scan. The
assumption is that random noise will average to a null-point while echoes from a real indication will
always be in phase at the same time. This is very effective in improving the signal to noise ratio and in
bring out the Lateral Wave, which can be very weak, from the background noise. Typically averaging
can be performed over 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 or more A-scans. It has been found that 4, 8 and 16 are
typically used, while the higher signal averaging is useful for coarse grained microstructure's.
b) Post processing
1) Parabolic cursor. It is essential that the system is capable of providing a parabolic cursor that
mimics the response from an idealised zero-point reflector through out the time range covered by
the data. This is used to establish indication length and to confirm point reflector/broken
indications.
2) Lateral Wave Straightening. Again this is an essential tool which significantly improves data
analysis and can reveal flaws lying just beneath the Lateral Wave.
3) Linearization algorithms. The B and D-scan display as generated during a scan, while showing the
near and remote surfaces (Lateral Wave and BWE) is not a true representation of depth. These
algorithms linearize the B or D-scan to display depth rather than time-of-flight. Not essential.
4) Subtraction of Lateral Wave and/or BWE. These processing techniques sample a selected section
of the Lateral Wave or BWE, averaging and inverting the signal which is then subtracted from all
of the Lateral Wave or BWE in the record. This is a software solution to the dead zone problem
and may reveal hidden flaw indications. Not essential
5) SAFT. The Synthetic Aperture Focusing Technique (SAFT) synthesises the effect of a larger
aperture transducer by combining the digitised A-scans for a number of different sequential probe
positions. The effect is as if a collimated beam of ultrasound of about half the crystal diameter had
been used in the collection of the data. This tidies up the leading and trailing wings of the
indications, improving the measurement of length while also improving the signal to noise ratio. At
its best, it can virtually remove point reflectors while leaving flaw indications with a more accurate
indication of their length. An example of SAFT applied to a D-scan taken across four sided-drilled
holes of different diameter in illustrated in Figure B.6.
55
6) Display Enhancement Technique. Display enhancement techniques are useful in aiding data
analysis or in highlighting flaw indications for subsequent reporting and various techniques are
usually available with the instrumentation and data processing suite. One such technique is a
threshold display, which can be used to sharpen the image by removing low-level grey-scale
information, e.g. Figure B.7 is the same data presented in Figure B.3 but with a ±3% threshold
applied.
RAW DATA
Figure B.6 ToFD Synthetic Aperture Focusing Technique
SAFT
Figure B.7 ToFD D-Scan Threshold Enhancement
56
Annex C
ToFD Probe Centre separation, Look-up Tables
(informative)
C.1 PCS for 45° probes in thicknesses <25 mm
Probe Wedges Enter wedge id. Total probe delay = Enter delay µs
Nom. angle 45° Based on Vc = 5930 m/s
Focus 1.0 T 0.75 T 1.0 T 0.75 T 1.0 T 0.75 T
Thickness Probe Centre separation Time to Lateral Wave Time to BWE

mm mm (exc. probe delay) µs (exc. probe delay) µs
8 16.0 12.0 2.7 2.0 3.8 3.4
9 18.0 13.5 3.0 2.3 4.3 3.8
10 20.0 15.0 3.4 2.5 4.8 4.2
11 22.0 16.5 3.7 2.8 5.2 4.6
12 24.0 18.0 4.0 3.0 5.7 5.1
13 26.0 19.5 4.5 3.3 6.2 5.5
14 28.0 21.0 4.7 3.5 6.7 5.9
15 30.0 22.5 5.1 3.8 7.2 6.3
16 32.0 24.0 5.4 4.0 7.6 6.7
17 34.0 25.5 5.7 4.3 8.1 7.2
18 36.0 27.0 6.1 4.6 8.6 7.6
19 38.0 28.5 6.4 4.8 9.1 8.0
20 40.0 30.0 6.7 5.1 9.5 8.4
21 42.0 31.5 7.1 5.3 10.0 8.9
22 44.0 33.0 7.4 5.6 10.5 9.3
23 46.0 34.5 7.8 5.8 11.0 9.7
24 48.0 36.0 8.1 6.1 11.4 10.1
25 50.0 37.5 8.4 6.3 11.9 10.5
57
C.2 PCS for 55° probes in thicknesses from 8 to 100 mm
Focus 1.0 T 0.75 T 1.0 T 0.75 T 1.0 T 0.75 T
8 23.0 3.9 4.7
10 28.5 4.8 5.9
12 34.5 5.8 7.1
14 40.0 30.0 6.7 5.1 8.2 6.9
16 45.5 34.5 7.7 5.8 9.4 7.9
18 51.5 38.5 8.7 6.5 10.6 8.9
20 57.0 43.0 9.6 7.2 11.8 9.9
22 63.0 47.0 10.6 7.9 12.9 10.9
24 68.5 51.5 11.6 8.7 14.1 11.9
Focus 0.667 T 0.667 T 0.667 T
26 49.5 8.4 12.1
28 53.5 9.0 13.0
30 57.0 9.6 14.0
32 61.0 10.3 14.9
34 65.0 10.9 15.8
36 68.5 11.6 16.8
38 72.5 12.2 17.7
40 76.0 12.9 18.6
42 80.0 13.5 19.6
44 84.0 14.1 20.5
46 87.5 14.8 21.4
48 91.5 15.4 22.4
50 95.5 16.1 23.3
Focus 0.75 T 0.375 T 0.75 T 0.375 T 0.75 T 0.375 T
55 118.0 58.9 19.9 9.9 27.2 21.0
60 128.5 64.3 21.7 10.8 29.7 23.0
65 139.0 69.6 23.5 11.7 32.1 24.9
70 150.0 75.0 25.3 12.6 34.6 26.8
80 171.5 85.7 28.9 14.5 39.5 30.6
90 193.0 96.4 32.5 16.3 44.5 34.4
100 214.0 107.1 36.1 18.1 49.4 38.3
58
C.3 PCS for 60° probes in thicknesses from 8 to 100 mm
Focus 1.0 T 0.75 T 1.0 T 0.75 T 1.0 T 0.75 T
8 27.5 4.7 5.4
10 34.5 5.8 6.7
12 41.5 7.0 8.1
14 48.5 36.5 8.2 6.1 9.4 7.7
16 55.5 41.5 9.3 7.0 10.8 8.8
18 62.5 47.0 10.5 7.9 12.1 10.0
20 69.5 52.0 11.7 8.8 13.5 11.1
22 76.0 57.0 12.9 9.6 14.8 12.2
24 83.0 62.5 14.0 10.5 16.2 13.3
Focus 0.667 T 0.667 T 0.667 T
26 60.0 10.1 13.4
28 64.5 10.9 14.4
30 69.5 11.7 15.5
32 74.0 12.5 16.5
34 78.5 13.2 17.5
36 83.0 14.0 18.6
38 88.0 14.8 19.6
40 92.5 15.6 20.6
42 97.0 16.4 21.6
44 101.5 17.1 22.7
46 106.5 17.9 23.7
48 111.0 18.7 24.7
50 115.5 19.5 25.8
Focus 0.75 T 0.375 T 0.75 T 0.375 T 0.75 T 0.375 T
55 143.0 71.5 24.1 12.0 30.4 22.1
60 156.0 78.0 26.3 13.1 33.2 24.1
65 169.0 84.5 28.5 14.2 35.9 26.1
70 182.0 91.0 30.7 15.3 38.7 28.2
80 208.0 104.0 35.0 17.5 44.2 32.2
90 234.0 117.0 39.4 19.7 49.8 36.2
100 260.0 130.0 43.8 21.9 55.3 40.2
59
Annex D
Suggested ToFD Calibration Block
(informative)
D.1 Notched ToFD Calibration Block
20mm to 25mm
NON-PARALLEL SCAN
D-SCAN
200mm
60mm
PARALLEL SCAN
Tx Rx
B-SCAN
X
Y
8T T
DETAILS OF NOTCH
60° AT DEEPEST 0.2T
1mm to 2mm
60
Annex E
Examples of Typical ToFD Defect Images
(informative)
61
62
Annex F
Additional ToFD Defect Images
(informative)
Figure F.1 Remote surface breaking crack, D-scan
Figure F.2 Shallow remote broken surface breaking flaw, D-scan
63
Figure F.3 Fatigue cracks at toe of tee-butt weld, D-scan
Figure F.4 Thin plate remote surface crack, D-scan
64
Figure F.5 Embedded lack-of-fusion and near surface crack, D-scan
Figure F.6 Intermittent HAZ crack and slag line, tee-butt weld toe, D-scan
65
Figure F.7 Crossing tee-butt weld and defective weld repair area, D-scan
Figure F.8 Column type broken flaw at crossing tee-butt weld, D-scan
66
Annex G
Ultrasonic Phased Array Technique
(informative)
G.1 Basic Principles
G.1.1 The ultrasonic phased array technique is not new; the concept of utilising multiple piezoelectric
crystals within a single probe has been around for many years. Typically these early phased array probes
contained a relatively small number of comparatively large crystals that resulted in a broad, paintbrush style,
ultrasound beam. While these were effective as a coarse wide-area screening probe, particularly as
compression wave search units checking for plate delaminations, they generally did not have the necessary
resolution for the detection and sizing of welding flaws.
G.1.2 Today’s weld inspection ultrasonic phased array technology relies on many of the advances in
medical ultrasound, electronic miniaturisation, fabrication and computer processing technology. Resulting in
powerful manual and automated phased array inspection systems, that are finding greater application in
industry.
G.1.3 Phased array transducers now contain anything from 8 to 128 crystals or elements. The elements
can be arranged in a linear, annular (circular doughnut-shaped elements) or a matrix configuration. In a
linear array the width of each element can range from 0.5 mm to 2.5 mm and is generally much smaller than
its length. A 32-element linear transducer with a 2.5 mm grid would therefore be at least 80 mm long. Each
element within the array can act as a separate ultrasonic transducer. Although independently driven they can
be pulsed in-groups was well as individually in a time sequence to produce various wavefronts. When
pulsed, each element emits a small ultrasonic wave and the wavefronts from each element interfere, both
destructively and constructively, generating an overall wavefront, as illustrated in Figure G.1. To ensure that
the sound beam is in phase with constructive interference each active element of the transducer is pulsed at
slightly different time, i.e. computer-controlled excitation of amplitude and delay of the individual elements.
ELECTRONIC PULSE
ELEMENTS
WAVEFRONT
Figure G.1 Phased Array Transducer
67
G.1.4 The control over which element or group of elements are to be activated and the width and time
delay (measured in nanoseconds) of the high voltage triggering pulse for each element are known as Delay
or Focal laws. These focal laws allow the generation of various sound beams and gives the ability to;
• electronically focus at different depths,

• electronically scan across the transducer elements,
• electronically steer the sound beam to different angles, and
• electronically sweep the sound beam over a range of angles, typically a ±30° range from a flat
transducer.
G.1.5 Like conventional ultrasonic transducers, the phased array transducer must act as both a
transmitter and as a receiver. In transmission mode, after receiving a trigger signal the inspection system
fires each element with a high-voltage pulse, width and time delay defined by the delay or focal law, creating
a beam with a specific angle and focus depth. This beam interacts with the defect and is reflected back to
the transducer. The transducer acting now as a receiver picks up these return signals. The inspection
system then processes the returned signals in accordance with the receiving focal law (time-shifts the signals
for each element) and generates a composite ultrasonic signal that is displayed and recorded.
G.1.6 While it is possible to electronically steer the sound beam over a range of angles with a flat
transducer, G.1.4, it is not possible to cover the range of angles used in the inspection of welds. Like
conventional ultrasonic transducers the phased array transducer is therefore coupled to a wedge of material
(usually acrylic) in order to achieve the spread of angles necessary for weld inspection. Again, like
conventional ultrasonics this produces shear wave sound beams at a nominal angle in the material being
examined in accordance with Snell's law. It has been found that the sound beam can be effectively swept
over a ±15° angular range about this nominal probe angle, e.g. a swept range of 40° to 70° in shear would
have a nominal angle of about 55° in shear. Which covers the three-principle inspection angles, 45°, 60° and
70° within one probe.
G.2 Beam Scanning Techniques

There are three main beam scanning techniques, which are illustrated in Figure G.2 and described below.
a) Dynamic Depth Focusing: Scanning along the beam axis is performed at different focal depths. Typically
a single transmitted pulse is used and the focus point is moved along the line of the nominal beam axis
by varying the focal law. For dynamic depth focusing, the focal law takes the form of a parabola with the
delay increasing from the edges of the array towards the centre. The delay on the central element will
double as the focal distance is halved. This technique is an alternative to using several transducers to
focus at different depths.
b) Electronic Scanning: Electronic or linear scanning involves energising a smaller sub-set of the phased
array elements to form the desired beam profile and then electronically multiplexing this focal law along
the aperture (length) of the array. When angled wedges are used, the focal law has to be modified to
take into account the different time delays within the wedge for each element. This is the electronic
equivalent to mechanically raster scanning a probe of a smaller aperture across the length of the larger
phased array probe. This can be combined with dynamic depth focusing and electronic steering to
sweep a focused, angled or a focused and angled beam across the length of the probe.
c) Electronic Steering: In electronic steering or sectorial scanning (also called azimuthal or angular
scanning) different delays are applied to individual elements to steer the sound beam to a fixed angle or
to sweep the sound beam over a range of angles. When angled wedges are used the focal law has a
parabolic shape for the given angle calculated from Snell's law. To obtain angles lower than the Snell's
law value, the parabolic shape is modified by increasing the pulse delay on the elements from the back
toward the front of the probe. To obtain angles greater than the Snell's law value the pulse delay is
higher for the elements at the back of the probe, as the sound from the front elements have a longer
path in the wedge material and must be excited first.
68
DELAY/FOCAL LAW
ELECTRONIC SCANNING DELAY/FOCAL LAW
DYNAMIC DEPTH ELECTRONIC

STEERING
FOCUSING
BEAM MOVEMENT
Figure G.2 Beam Scanning Techniques
G.3 Beam Coverage
G.3.1 To ensure that the inspection set-up is appropriate and that either full coverage or at least coverage
of the weld region of interest is achieved, it is important to generate coverage diagrams, beam plots, prior to
the examination. These coverage diagrams, examples are given in Figure G.3 and Figure G.4, model the
beam angle and scanning (linear or sectorial/azimuthal) and defines the index point in accordance with the
focal law applied. The model defines the stand-off required to achieve the desired coverage and the final
probe position if raster scanning is also required.
Figure G.3 Linear Scan Coverage Diagram
69
Figure G.4 Sectorial or Azimuthal Scan Coverage Diagram
NOTE For clarity the two coverage diagrams do not include raster scan lines, which would be required if full weld
coverage was needed.
G.4 Phased Array Imaging

Phased array scanning of welds is usually performed with a mechanical scanning rig which can be either
motor or manually driven over the material under examination. In both cases positional feedback from an
encoder must be provided to the controlling computer to allow data collection. The data collected can then
be displayed in a variety of views or any combination of views for interpretation.
⎯ Electronic B-scan, displays data from the multiple A-scans generated from a linear scan.
⎯ Sectorial scan or S-scan, displays the data from a sectorial or azimuthal scan. The S-scan display has
been adapted from medical ultrasound to fit industrial inspection applications.
⎯ Positional B-scan, displays the data from the electronic B-scans or S-scans along with probe movement
(raster position) to generate a linear B-scan image.
⎯ Positional C-scan, displays a composite image from the multiple A-scans generated from either a linear
or sectorial scan and from raster movement along with probe movement along the weld.
⎯ Positional D-scan, displays a composite image from the multiple A-scans generated from either a linear
or sectorial scan along with probe movement along the weld.
70
G.4.1 Examples of various display types from actual weld examinations are given in Figures G.5 to G.7.
Figure G.5 Sectorial (azimuthal) S-scan
Figure G.6 Linear Electronic Angled Beam Scan
71
Echo-dynamic
B-scan
C-scan
D-scan
A-scan
Figure G.7 Combined, A-scan, Electronic B-scan, C-scan, D-scan, and Echo-dynamic views
G.5 Optimising Phased Array Techniques
G.5.1 The number and size of elements within a phased array transducer is a factor which may affect the
inspection accuracy. Increasing the number of elements improves the signal to noise ratio. This however
may limit the ability to perform an effective linear scan of the elements. The calculation of the start and finish
stand-off positions and the production of coverage diagrams is essential for linear scans, particularly for thick
section welds, to ensure full coverage of the weld or the region of interest.
G.5.2 The probe wedges used for phased array transducers are typically general purpose wedges with
little design considerations for standing echoes or sound reverberations within the wedges. It is important
that details of standing echoes and probe reverberations are understood and identified as such. It is possible
that for a given array spacing, wedge angle and focal law, diffraction grating side lobes may be produced.
The effect of these diffraction grating lobes is to be minimised. For specific applications specially designed
probes and wedges will be beneficial and where the same phased array scanning techniques are in routine
used then wedge design is recommended.
G.5.3 As yet there are no specific national standards for phased array transducers or inspection
procedures. The application of phased array techniques should therefore be supported with a technical
procedure sheet that details the probe geometry, wedge design, focal laws, calibration, sensitivity etc.
Assessment of the probe and wedge performance should be made with reference to BS EN 12688 part 2 as
a starting point. Establishing the sensitivity of the phased array techniques is much more complex than for
conventional ultrasonic techniques, as the sensitivity will vary for each focal law applied and for each mode
of scanning. One approach is to select the optimum sensitivity setting that provides detectability of the
defects within a given test-piece geometry and material, e.g. the defect image is visible against the
background noise, probe or geometry echoes. To achieve this it is usual to set the sensitivity at 80% full
screen height for a particular target, e.g. a 3 mm diameter side drilled hole, in a test-block at the desired
region of interest. In this way the sensitivity can be compared with that from a conventional ultrasonic set-up
with conventional probes.
72
Annex H
Characterisation of Phased Array Generated Ultrasound Beams
(normative)
H.1 Characterisation of Ultrasound Beams
H.1.1 A method for the rapid and reproducible characterisation of the ultrasound beams generated by
phased array transducer/wedge combinations in terms of the generated sound beam angle or angles and the
index point is outlined. This utilises the response from a specific target, 3 mm diameter side drilled hole
(SDH), in a calibration block to determine the true beam angle and corresponding probe/wedge index point
for the applied focal law. The calibration block should be machined from the same or ultrasonically similar
material to that under examination and should contain a number of target SDH's. Details of a suggested
calibration block are given in Figure H.1. The length of the block should be five times the length of the probe,
it should be 60 mm or twice the weld/plate thickness under examination deep and it should be at least
50 mm thick.
REFERENCE
20mm POINT
PROBE MOVEMENT
MEASURED BY ENCODER
10%
15%
30mm
30mm
40%
GENERATED 50%
ULTRASOUND
BEAM
60mm MIN.
2T MAX.
ALL SIDED DRILLED HOLES (SDH) ARE ø3mm
100%
100%
15%
10%
30mm
2.5 x PROBE LENGTH 2.5 x PROBE LENGTH
Figure H.1 Phased Array Calibration Block
H.1.2 With the probe movement encoder calibrated in accordance with the prescribed instructions for the
equipment in use, a line scan across the calibration block is performed as indicated in Figure H.1. The
response from the principle target, the 3 mm diameter SDH at 30 mm down and 30 mm from the block's
centre-line, is displayed and assessed to give the beam characteristics. The beam angle can be determined
from the depth of the indication while the index point is determined from the horizontal location of the
indication. Values of acceptable tolerances for various beam angles and probe frequencies are given in
Table 7.
H.1.3 Examples of scans performed with a 32 element probe generating a 45° beam, from a focal law
applied to a 12 element group (21 focal laws in total), from the 1st (elements 1 to 12) and the 21st (elements
21 to 32) focal laws are given in Figure H.2. In each case the maximum response, indicated by the intensity
of the red spot, lies within the allowable tolerance a 3 mm diameter SDH at 30 mm depth with a 5 MHz 45°
beam angle.
73
Table H.1 Phased Array Beam Tolerance Values
Beam angle Beam angle tolerance Hole depth tolerance Index point tolerance
degree (% of hole depth) mm
Frequency ≤2 MHz >2 MHz ≤2 MHz >2 MHz ≤2 MHz >2 MHZ
30° ±3° ±2° ±3% ±2% ±1 or 2 ±1
45° ±3° ±2° ±5% ±3% ±1 or 2 ±1
60° ±3° ±2° ±8% ±6% ±1 or 2 ±1
70° ±3° ±2° ±17% ±11% ±1 or 2 ±1
1st Focal law group 21st Focal law group
Figure H.2 Focal Law Images
H.1.4 The probe/wedge performance can then be checked over the desired beam path by scanning
towards one of the groups of three SDH's near the edges of the block.
H.2 Coverage Diagrams
H.2.1 This block can also be used to confirm or develop coverage diagrams for the scans that are going to
be used in the examination. Having characterised the beam and confirmed that the focal laws are generating
beams of the desired angle and scan type, linear or sectorial. The probe is positioned on the calibration
block so that the response from the target is maximised for the 1st focal law, e.g. first beam in a linear scan
or lowest angle in a sectorial scan. The position of the index point is recorded along with the distance to the
target. The probe is then repositioned to maximise the response from the last focal law, e.g. the final linear
beam or highest sectorial angle and the position of the index point and distance to the target is recorded.
From the measurements the beam coverage can be confirmed and a coverage diagram generated.
74
Inside Rear Cover
©Crown Copyright 2013
Copying Only as Agreed with DStan
Defence Standards are published by and obtainable from:
Defence Equipment and Support
UK Defence Standardization
Kentigern House
65 Brown Street
GLASGOW
G2 8EX
DStan Helpdesk
Tel: 44 (0) 141 224 2531/2
Fax: 44 (0) 141 224 2503
Internet e-mail: enquiries@dstan.mod.uk
File Reference
The DStan file reference relating to work on this standard is D/DStan/69/2/729/5.
Contract Requirements
When Defence Standards are incorporated into contracts users are responsible for their correct
application and for complying with contractual and statutory requirements. Compliance with a Defence
Standard does not in itself confer immunity from legal obligations.
Revision of Defence Standards

Defence Standards are revised as necessary by an up issue or amendment. It is important that users
of Defence Standards should ascertain that they are in possession of the latest issue or amendment.
Information on all Defence Standards can be found on the DStan Website www.dstan.mod.uk,
updated weekly and supplemented regularly by Standards in Defence News (SID News). Any person
who, when making use of a Defence Standard encounters an inaccuracy or ambiguity is requested to
notify UK Defence Standardization (DStan) without delay in order that the matter may be investigated
and appropriate action taken. Sponsors and authors shall refer to Def Stan 00-00 before proceeding
with any standards work.

Ut For Weld PDF

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Ut For Weld PDF

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Defence Standard 02-729 Part 5

Issue 3 Date: 21 June 2013

Figure 13 Complex Geometry PA beam-plot, single sided inspection.....................................................32

Amd No Date Text Affected Signature and Date

This standard is raised to Issue 3 to update its content.

This standard supersedes the following:

Def Stan 02-729 Part 5 Issue 1, dated 1st April 2000

0.3 This standard has been produced on behalf of DES NAG-MT.

Requirements for Non-Destructive Examination Methods

BS EN 583 Non-destructive testing. Ultrasonic examination

BS EN 16018 Non-destructive testing, Terminology

b) Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, acceptance inspection is to be performed on an

7 General Inspection Requirements

7.1 Personnel Requirements

f) Personnel are to be conversant with the effects of:

7.2 Ultrasonic Test Procedure

i) model or type and make;

5) The method of recording the results of examination;

6) Pre examination and post examination cleaning methods as applicable;

7) Date, place and time of examination.

7.3 Equipment Requirements

Ultrasonic equipment is to consist of the following:

Procedure No Issue No Date

Company Procedure drafted by

(a) Location (b) Thickness

(c) Surface condition. (d) Surface preparation

(a) Test instrument Model/Serial no.

(b) Mode of presentation A-scan, B-scan, C-scan, D-scan:

(c) Method of recording Manual – hardcopy, electronic, logging etc.

Probe(s) Type: Twin crystal/Single – Compression/Shear

Couplant: Water/Glycerol/Cellulose paste/other

Scan control: Mechanical/Template guide/other

a. Flat Bottom Hole: Dia. mm Depth. mm Beam path length.

b. Notch length. mm Depth. mm Width: mm

Diagrams to be used as necessary.

5. Acceptance Standard Specification

Figure 1 Example of an Ultrasonic Report data sheet

7.4 Equipment Performance Characteristics

7.5 Equipment Qualification

7.6 Sensitivity Calibration Reference Blocks

7.7 Method of Examination

1) Controlled reproducible examination at the specified sensitivity is to be consistently achieved and

7.8 Surface Finish

8.2 Surface Preparation

8.3 Compression Wave Inspection

8.5 Method of Examination

8.6 Shear Wave Examination

Table 1 Square Notch Dimensions

Width of notch 2 x depth

Length of notch Approximately 40 mm

The following information is to be recorded in addition to the test procedure:

9 Plate Thickness Measurement

9.1 Plate Thickness

9.2 Instrument Calibration

9.4 Surface Preparation

10 Phased Array Corrosion Mapping and Thickness Gauging

Figure 2 Reference Block for PA Thickness Gauging, Sensitivity and Calibration

10.2 Instrument Calibration

Calibration is to be carried out using a dedicated block, which should be:

10.4 Surface Preparation

10.7 Phased Array corrosion mapping colour palette

1) Palette requirements for 12 mm plate and greater

2) Palette requirements for 12 mm plate and less