Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1
Social, Political, Economic, and Cultural Issues in Philippine History
During the Commonwealth government years, the condition were deteriorated as farmers
revolts increased and landlords-tenant affiliation became more and more disparate. President Quezon
placed a social justice program concentrated on the purchased of haciendas, which were to be distributed
and traded to tenants. His government also created the National Rice and Corn Corporation (NARIC) to
allocate public defenders to assist farmers in the court battles for their privileges to the land, and the
Court of Industrial Relations to use jurisdiction over disagreements arising from landowner-tenant
affiliation. The homestead program also continuous over the National Land Settlement Administration
(NLSA). Efforts toward agrarian reform by the Commonwealth failed because of many difficulties such as
budget distribution for the settlement program and widespread farmer revolts. World War II put
cessation to all interventions to solve these problems as the Japanese occupied the country.
Course Module
Restoration and innovation after the war were engrossed on providing solutions to the problems
of the previous the administration of President Roxas handed Republic Act No. 34 to establish a 70-30
allocation arrangement between tenant and landowner, correspondingly, which reduced the interest of
landowners’ mortgages to tenants at six percent or less. The government also tried to reallocated
hacienda lands, deteriorating prey to despairs of similar actions since no provision was given to small
agrarians who were given lands.
The Land Settlement Development Corporation (LASEDECO), under the period of President
Elpidio Quirino, was established to accelerate and expand the resettlement program for farmers, this
agency later on became the National Resettlement and Rehabilitation Administration (NARRA) under the
government of President Ramon Magsaysay. Magsaysay saw the significance of pursuing genuine land
reform program and persuaded the Congress, majority of which were elite owners, to pass legislation to
develop the land reform situation.
NARRA improved the government’s relocation program and dissemination of agricultural lands to
landless tenants and agrarians. It also intended to persuade members of the Huks, a movement of rebels
in Central Luzon, to relocate in areas where they could resume their lives as peaceful citizen.
A major pace in land reform arrived during the term of President Diosdado Macapagal over the
Agricultural Land Reform Code (Republic Act No.3844)
This Code eliminated share occupancy in the Philippines and prescribed a program to
transform tenant-farmers to boarders and later on owner-cultivators. It also aimed to allowed tenants
from tenancy and emphasize owner-cultivatorship and agrarian individuality, equality, equity,
productivity improvement, and public land dissemination.
Reading in Philippine History
5
Social, Political, Economic, and Cultural Issues in Philippine History
Many other techniques were engaged by the elite to discover a way to uphold their power
and power, which were deteriorated by the exploitation of Marcos and his associates who were also
involve in the agricultural area.
Course Module
CARPER and the Further of Agrarian Reform in the Philippines
“The new deadline of CARP terminated in 2008, leaving 1.2 million agrarian beneficiaries and 1.6
million hectares of agricultural land to be disseminated to farmers. In 2009, Republic Act No. 9700 was
signed by President Arroyo or the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program Extension with Reforms
(CARPER), the amendatory law that extended the deadline to five more years. Section 30 of the law also
mandates that any case and/or continuing including the implementation of provisions of CARP, as amended,
which may endure pending on 30 June 2014 shall be allowed to proceed to its finality and executed even
beyond such date.”
From 2009 to 2014, CARPER has disseminated a total of 1 million hectares of property to 900,000
agrarian beneficiaries. After 27 years of land reform and two Aquino admirations, 500,000 hectares of
properties stay undistributed. The DAR and Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR)
are the government agencies mandated to fulfill CARP and CARPER, however even the joint effort and
resources of the two agencies have shown incapable of fully accomplishing the aim of agrarian reform in
the Philippines. The same problems have afflicted its implementation: the influential landed elite and the
indecisive bureaucracy of the Philippine government. Until these two challenges are conquered, genuine
agrarian reform in the Philippines remains but a dream to Filipino Farmers who have been fighting for
their right to landownership for eras.