Sei sulla pagina 1di 10

Zahra Hosseini %!

" #$
Islamic Azad University
South Tehran Branch

Abstract (%&'
he present research studied the effects of collabora- 01 % / + ,-# . )* )!" # $% &' (
T tive learning on critical thinking. An experimental and 1 =6< ; # 7,8# ,9 . : 56 # 4 ( . 3 . 2,
a witness group, each composed of 30 female mathemati- 01 7 ' 1, > * * 1 =6 *
cs students, were administered Critical Thinking Test (OCR, # @ A' 3 8 > ?666 $OCR< # . 2,
2000). Next, the experimental group was taught a course B )8 7 * *# ,-# )8 7 *#
using the method of collaborative learning. The witness 7- . JH, I A # - G)DE F , 3 8 C
group was taught the same course using the method of lec- )8 # 8 # J,L $. 2, G)DE < . 2, 01 K# 7
turing. The results of MANCOVA showed that the experimen- )!" I3 * * %) * # >. 2,
tal group outperformed the witness group in three subscales 3 M+ * # N OE # . 2, 01 . # ,-# . )*
of critical thinking namely, critical analysis, credibility of

evidence and critical evaluation. The way collaborative , *(% + * # )


learning affects critical thinking skills is discussed. !

Key words: collaborative learning, critical thinking, cri-


tical analysis, credibility of evidence, critical evaluation.

received : 12 Feb 2008 )*'(('%& $ "#


Contact information : z_hosseini14@yahoo.com accepted : 25 Jan 2009 ). '(% '* $ - +,
3p + A - (.
] J # # # 8 W : % &' ( ,X* \ , 0 L 7 . 2, 01 7- M Q P
Q F'Q 9# 7 ) . 2, 01 . # () . 1 R 7,+ * # N 7 # 8 . +
$ 0 i6 VD,B . 7,8# . : q ?5 # / T# 0 ' 3M 8 7S # . R,
. )*& 7)D- . 2, 01 K# N () MJj ] J # . )S V # @ 7U/ 7 # . 2, 01 > <
/) . R . &' # 3 # . 2, 7 ) $.# E GS X V R .# W : # + D-
8 ) " )H, ( () V)R; MJj 7` # $\ , , $[ # M)Y Z)B $OE @ # . 7); +
3>?66? $ # /,0 #< /) J,R 8 G P F , )X1 $] J ,
, + 9. ) # a > 6< )X)+ G' # U 4 . J 3 7,X . 2, )8 #
# Y # . 2, 01 [J . 7 ) /) _# )8 ( , . 2, 01 > ^<
$G)DE $f. 01 8 # $q M2)2 o & . #9 ) ( 3M 01 # M # + 01
?
,+ Y . ) )' $ 6A1 7 Y,L $ .# 4 01 )8 # G)DE . ` ; # )R ())R
# 3>?66 $ U# - )* )X)+ $ )X)+< - ZB 7P 9 # a 7 3M C ,X* [X # 4 7 9
n# . 2, 01 . )* @J () ] J # # 7- M Q 2R 01 L $. 2, 01
W .: ? . )* @J # > i< - $c) W : c # # 7d # # . )* c)Yb
) %)' $. )* @ J 7- ,+ # . # - 9 3> f $A) A # < # e* )!"
$( 3M . 2, 01 . X # P# 7r - . 2, 01 () ] J # VD,B &'
i
. # R )H, @ L 7 # . )* @J M9 8 + ^ 2` 01 $=h 9 01 $?7 DgX G
% &' # 3 - s ` . 2, 01 . # 7R G2 i< 5 / U Q j . 3 - 7 ,X #
. )* @J 7` # /) >?666< # 0) $ # 8# 7 7 DgX 7 N 9 G M 2,R > =f? $
3 8 )S" . 2, 01 >?666< X $ - @Y- . 2, 01 . #
01 . # t - ) %)' L 7 /) A >?66i< G' . 2, 01 - G)Y0 # h 9 01
# )9 K RU ` # . 2, 01 7 ) . 2, G)DE 7 /: ) d)' # 0+ @ kD9
/,0 # G2 5< %U 3M 7,+ * # N # 3 . 2, )8 #

Journal of Iranian Psychologists -Vol. 5/ Issue 19/ Spring 2009


)!" A X)U # . : ^ # >?66? $ # 01 . J # /) M 9 8 + 2` 01
3 - ) " . 2, 01 7 ) # # A t - ) %)' 3> f $ m ff $(Yl ) U< X 7 . 2,
: # # 7- . % &' # $ 2` 01 # $ 01 R 9 # 4 7(
7) . )* @J 7` # () )R # 4 7 # D+ # M-# 7DgX G . 2, 01 $h 9 01
. 2, 01 A () 8 W : . 2, 01 3M K 1, M-# ( c
3> ?666 $ #< # R ] J# n 7- # D L )8 - &'
/) >?666< * / $ U @ $ $ )* $ Xl $# ) %)' 0 . 2, 01 ,XJY
7 3 ,+ ) M )H, ( () # R ] J # 7 $( $. )* @J $. 2, 01 7 ) o - S 8

1. critical thinking 6. Lumsdanie, E. 11. inquisitiveness


2. problem solving 7. truth-seeking 12. maturity
3. creative thinking 8. open-mindedness
4. logical thinking 9. systematicity
5. metacognition 10. self-confidence
?6
7- $ # - 3>?666 $ Y < M . 1 # - X )0 M) c)DR 4 u P 9 2,L
: . )*# /) 7` # # >?665< ( - *& @ . 2, 01 > i< > q<
G R 7- . )* ! n -# $ &' F , 7- U # 3M p + 7 7,X
3 01 . T }` 7 # : >?66i $/ $ # # < vN # 2,L ( *
A $ ), $ G - @ [ 7- 2)2E # ( ) dY 3 ,X >?66f $()-# < )" # *
W: 8() 7,8# : # # >?66i< M ) %)' # $W 1 * ,X* 7 7
: . 2, 01 . # /) 7X 2 7 $ 8 M s ` Q w ( # Y $. 2, 01 . -
% &' ( F , 3 ,9 ' ,-# , . )8 # 3 ,X . 2, 01 ,X ,)U R+ G L 7I 7-
n -# : , ) M-# 7- - ZB # ,X* % &' @ # >?66 < )X)+
% - % - xN # 3M Y . 2, 01 8# 7- -M ! .: 66 %) #
3 % /+ # QT , $ )* + $x N # 3M . )* G N . 2, 01 . #
# . 2, 01 C M)Y 7 7 M ()2 7 $M G0 . 2, 01 . )*
[ 8 G L ())R 7 ) # % &' 7 ) . )S $ 4 u P # .# )X # 3MX) ,+ )
. )* ! # ; % &' $ - : m - )JR . 2, 01 z. # y 7 # . 2, 01
G 8 . # . 2, 01 ,-# 7- M Y ) . )* 7- #
G08 i. 2, )8 # ^ 8 # J,L $=. 2, G)DE Y ( W: . 8 W : G - /- Y
3M+ * < M .# ; # 9 A' 7S # $ Y # $ a
3 >?66i $# D*
0 ^66 # # >?665< MX # 7- &' #
. *s a 5 7J8 C # % &' ( ZB W : # D+ U L 7 # .:
.# 7R 3 8 A' %)' XY : 70D # 7 8 [)E 7- 8
cDR M) 0 ; # 7,8# ,9 : # >?66q< /,)S U 3 # e* )!" . 2, 01 % *
3 G)0 ?66 . U a< : 7 . 2, 01 C
% /* n - B, k a 1 56 R 7R ( : W @ $C c{#7 7- M+ # >?66^
3 8 ~ b,9 * * 7 # $G0 ( G # 4 7 3 ,+ ) M K# ( 7
7,+ )' 7BX . 2, 01 . )* . c)4 . 8 # $% ' OE @I - . *
. . # $>?666 $qOCR) . 2, 01 G 08 * . |L # /) : E . )*
/

. # ( 3 8 1, $F JY- # 1X- G R 8 [)E 7- F , 3 ,+ *


# . 2, )8 # 8 # J,L $. 2, G )DE . 2, 01 : 7 ? ,-# . )* )* +
i . 7 /* # I Q w 5 . # - . )* . - @Y- A # #
• ' . U w $(, . , # 7- M - (, . )* 7 ) # % &' ?? %) F , . xY
Uw ( 7 B '. # 2 3 8s ` $ f ?^ . U 7DP + # $ ,-#
66 ( # G- Y c ) ML @ M N# %) ,-# . )* . # , 7- M

1. feedback 4. credibility of evidence 7. Oxford, Cambridge and RSA (Royal Society of Arts)
2. collaborative learning 5. critical evaluation Examinations
3. critical analysis 6. quasi experiment
?6
K# P # 8 * * 7 4 # ƒ A' G)DE . $.# e* Y . Y # n 7- M
3 - Q YL 9 # - # # 4 # K P $M2+ )8 # . 5 8 # J,L . $^6 . 2,
M-# . 3M+ MR M-# u) ( 7 .# e* Y 3M 8 # 4 ), ^^ . 2,
7 S# . . Y $ 7 * $ , ) 3 )* K# P )D- 1,
*. # , 8 B, n - # * M)U R+ >?66i< $/U [ # J,L
?
# 3 )* # N 4 Q J OE # n - # : ( 3 8 # 6•q € J - . 1U k a
. xY . J n# DP . ,E ' # 4 7 . # })Eb $7Y A'
# . , # 3 8 ())R : D- . 4 7`2 : =6 # = # # J,L 2 #
. |L 9 # # 8 7, 9 : ) 1)U - . 2, 01 ,XJY 8
G)Y0 n# [ # -e W + 3 - K |N 9 * u ; 3M # ()J 7- M 7 6•55i
M-# Y xY n n# tY '# 7 6•5^ % &' ( # € J - . 1U
3 8 ())R . + Y : 3 >?66i< /U K RU ` GP F ,
G R ,-# A # )8 )!" „RU ` # 4 7 . )*& . J $A # C # . # 4 7
A # - G)DE $ %)' n A' . Y G)0 . 1 ^ . )* . * $ ,-# . )*
3M+# # - 7 ^. )H, I - . ,)U R+ 7 Y P # q6 $ # # 8
3M+ ~ b,9 Q XY) ' E, Y 7 P# =6
#-1 W: I7) # : $. )* 7XD #
GJN : . 2, 01 }` () ) . 7,+ ~ b,9 K‚ 8 Y # ,)U R+
# 2 ( 3 > 66 < ?=•q % &' . ' # 3 8 ())R .# 8 . J V)D0
# J,L . $^6 . 2, G)DE . GP . 7,+ 8 7, 9 : V)D0
^^ 5•i . 2, )8 # . 5 5•i 8 @ . ,8 3 - M8 # * #-
3> Q < 8 G E *7 # . *

!( /0 1
2 3 " 45 0 6 0 7 8 6 6 9: 0;<

Journal of Iranian Psychologists -Vol. 5/ Issue 19/ Spring 2009


A' % )'
* * n )2 s `
SD M SD M SD M SD M
5• 6 ?f•55 f•?6 =5• = q•^ ?^•5 q• f ??•f= . 2, 01
^•=^ ^•i ??• 5•qf ^•i= •qq ?•?q 6•^q . 2, G)DE
?•^^ q• = =•^^ 6•5q ?•^^ 5•== ?• f 5 8 # J,L
=•=q 5•i ^•6 5•=q =•^? 5•i ?• 5 5•=q . 2, )8 #
3 ) M 7 # R .# … EU . 2, 01 . # # * %)' . ) ) 7X 2 . M ), t 2 o7

3# # R ,9 * # . 2, 01 . %)' 7X 2
F= •5?< X # - Y 7; 1 # * . Y () ) () 7- *

1. reliability 3. validity
2. Cronbach’s alpha 4. Multivariate Analysis of Covariance ( MANCOVA)
?6
# R # . 2, 01 . # ,-# . )* I A # - G)DE # - # J,L >P†6• =q
# 8 G R . ) ) # Y 3>? Q < 3 - ) " # . )H,
3M 8 G08 ! . )H, I A # - G)DE GP F ,

!% /0 1
6 6 =0 9 > ?@ A 0 BCD
30E 60
P F K ))H xJ
. 2, G)DE %)'
6•if 6•=6 . 2, G)DE
6•ff= 6•6?? 8 # J,L
6•q=i 6• 5 . 2, )8 #

8 # J,L %)'
6•f== 6•6^i . 2, G)DE
6•666 ii•f6? 8 # J,L
6•?i^ •== . 2, )8 #

. 2, )8 # %)'
6•5?^ 6•?^= . 2, G)DE
6•6^q ^• ?q 8 # J,L
6•666 ^•65 . 2, )8 #

,-# . )*
6•6^5 ^•?6 . 2, G)DE
6•666 ^6•6i 8 # J,L
6•66 q• ^ i . 2, )8 #
3M >P< 6 •66 < i •ii )' . )H, IFo7

23
/

^6

.# )X XY ; % &' GP . 7,+ =i

$*J # )U m i $7U 9 * o < &' =6

G - @ m?66i $ # YR . I $ X9 m?66i ?i

?6
# - m?66? $M)Y M)Y $ ,)' m?66i $ *
i
$ XD m?66 $ ' _ $A # + m?665 $
6
01 ,-# . )* ! >?66q $ # m ^ i
3 - )" # . # . 2, 6

,-# A# C # . ,)D N . 2, 01 . 2, G)DE 8 # J,L . 2, )8 #

8 23 6 6 0 2 3 6? < F !(
R $ L Y, . D R $7j J $7DgX G . ,)U R+ E0 7
?6=
. )* # 1, # . ‰ 7,+# # - 7 $ 0 2 MP + K 1, . 4 # ƒ $x
$ ) 1)U - . 2, 01 . Qj L 7 < )H, ,-# . `)E . G L 7DY
W D . 72Ja $# $G - $ * X K L a Q 2, , . )* . `)E 7 MJX
3 - # 8 >7,9 k2E . 7- M ,)D N 7)0 3 8 B C#k a
% &' F , $. 2, 01 . # 7` # # $ 9. &' ˆ , ())J # $ &' .# )X
. # 7)D- # ,-# . )* ! /) ; . 8 # ( !w 0 L 7 # ,-# . )*
)8 # 8 # J,L $. 2, G)DE GY, # %2 7,X 01 . # ‰ M 2
3 ,X XY . &' 7- $ - ) " . 2, 0 $ X < - M Y . )* #
[)E 7I 7- M1* D- . xY @ # m?66= $# 8 # ' - m 6 $( m f6 $ X
() G R % /+ . K ) X : 4 . )* $p U $p m?665 $F # ' /,D $ Y
. )* x 7 , /) - M- 8 + ?66f n Y $?66^ $( Y U # $( # m ?66i
. . , ) MP + $ 8 { ‰ , $ K 1, . 7,+ # >?665< . * 7I * 3>?665 $# X)0
# 8 c + 4 # 0+ # 2 4 * . * () 9 % & '
. 2, 01 }` % /+ . . u ,X M 0 )' # R K 1 . 2, #
# 47 , # ( # 3 8 9c + : # ,-# . )* ! /) % &' . 7,+
. )* [)E 7X 2 # ,-# . )* [)E 3 - )S" . 2, 01 . #
01 . # % /+ . . , ) . ,)D N . + . &' Y Š J 2 $ ; % &' F , XY
3M # # 9 . 2, 01 & 7 # : % # # 8W :
$. 2, 01 # ,-# . )* ! ) " c{#7 A# C #7 - # 08 $K 1, }`
7 - ,9 7,X # 7,0 ( % &' ( . 7,+ u $ B , C # 7X 2 # ,-#
3 # # N ()S ' # : . 2, 01 . Y 01 . )* . # . T }` 7 ),
66 ?= # . 2, 01 . Y () ) &' 9 7- - a9 ex $ 8
3M G- Y W# I @ ,Y- /) ( 7- / $A) # T $> f5< n * * $> ff< n #
# : . 2, 01 . # }` ()S ' > q< + 8 G 0 - $> ^< ) A ) # T

Journal of Iranian Psychologists -Vol. 5/ Issue 19/ Spring 2009


&' 9 . 7,+ 7 % &' ( # , -# A # C # >?66 < , ,X0 T
$> =f5< 9 )X $ $ EU P 3 7,X ! # 01 . # M 2
. 7,+ F , ( 3M > =f=< D)D9 . YE . 7,+ () K 1 7) # . R, G L
Y $ ,X- > < - $>?66i< /U Q j . 3 8 7,8 %2 VD,B . &'
A' /) >?66q< /,)S U 3‡ ,X XY /) > 5< ‰ $ # # 01 ‰ $ 01 K 1, V # R 7
; Q # 7- M+ * 7:), : 56 7J b VD,B . 1 R $A # # OEJ ‰;
3 ,X . 2, 01 . # N+ : W @ . *t # K 1 $ ,-# . )* . )*&
. # s ` 7- s ; 7 7,+ ( $( $M-# . * # # - K 1, Q P $M-#
) ' # )X }` # : . 2, 01 # K 1 $ ) D)bE 7,8# x`2 A
. ) c # R, G L 7- M 3 # # N .# . 8 # # K 1 $ 8 # . 7 Y c:

3 >G- Y W @ %) Y-< Y 5 5•i ) . 2, 01 . Y () ) 7- F ,( ‡


?6
(1996). The implications of teaching norms for . 2, 01 . Y }` () ' #
the improvement of undergraduate education. Jour- ) 7- m 8 7,8 MU 9 :
nal of Higher Education, 67, 603-625. . - # K ƒ 1E )-" $ 8 . ) # 7
Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). k)YL . U w s a W L $c) 1 V R; $
Student engagement and student learning: Testing ) . )*& 9 /) 01 )
the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47 (1), #8 7 ' G)Y0 . W T R /) W L
1-32. 3 -
Davidson, B. (1995). Critical thinking education fa- 7,8 /) , E % &' ( #
ces the challenge of Japan. Inquiry: Critical Thin- ) 7- M . + . 2, 01 . )* 70 7DY
king Across the Disciplines, 14 (3), 41-53. 7 7 Y c: c- () dY 3 # # Y, 7
Dikici, A., & Yavuzer, Y. (2006). The effects of co- ) %)' 7 RU ` x $ . , E G)U
operative learning on the abilities of preservice 7 3 8 333 A $ ( . 2, 01 . -
art teacher candidates to lesson planning in Tur- . 2, 01 & 7 01 . # T M)Y 7
key. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 31 ; % &' F , . , # # $ U L C . 4 #
(2). . `)E : . W T K -# 8 )'
Doymus, K. (2008). Teaching chemical bonding thro- x . {$ /+ 3 8 c + ,-# . )*
ugh Jigsaw cooperative learning. Research in Sci- # c + 7 # 7 B ,- L a
ence & Technological Education, 2 (1), 47-57. , , ,-# . `)E 1, M # )X
Durkin, K. (2008). The Adaptation of East Asian Mas- 3 # 4 7 .# ;
ters students to western norms of critical thinking
and argumentation in the UK. Intercultural Edu- 4
cation, 19 (1), 15–27. 8 1 0 C I <H 8G 9; :8 96 7 5
Elder, L., & Paul, R. (1994). Critical thinking: Why ! ; 0 23 K 9 0 2 J
we must transform our thinking. Journal of Deve- E< M E 9 L 8 8H 9
lopmental Education, 18, 34-35. !N 4 "
Ernst, J., & Monroe, M. (2006). The effects of en- 6 6 9; 8 9< 7 % = 9 < 7*( 3
vironment-based education on students' critical !%( %& R(%Q P L, M - 3! 9 ,2 O
/

thinking skills and disposition toward critical thin- 9 D 7 E $( ? B=C 9A 7 %!" 7 9 6 7 7 9 0 7 3@ ? >
king. Environmental Education Research, 12 (34), E !2 9 , ?H N FS 0 9; 58
429-443. !2 L, M E< 0 9,
Facione, P. A. (1990). The California Critical Thin- Atkinson, D. (1997). A critical approach to critical
king Skills Test-college level. technical report#2. thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 31 (1),
Factors predictive of CT skills. Millbrae, CA: 71-94.

California Academic Press. Barbara, S. (1999). Critical thinking and culture: An


Facione, P. A., Facione, N. C., & Giancarlo, C. A., exploration. Educational Foundations, 13, 11-22.
(2001). California Critical Thinking Disposition Braxton, J. M., Eimers, M. T., & Bayer, A. E.

?6i
trative and Policy Studies School of Education. Inventory: CCTDI Inventory Manual. Millbrae,
Retrieved on Jan.14 2008 from http:// etd.library. CA: California Academic Press.
pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-04182007-205440/un- Forbes, H., Duke, M., & Prosser, M. (2001). Stu-

restricted/Howard Vetd 2007_1.pdf. dents' perceptions of learning outcomes from


Hwang, R., Lui, G., & Tong, M. J. Y. (2005). An group-based, problem-based teaching and lear-
empirical test of cooperative learning in a passive ning activities. Advances in Health Sciences Edu-

learning environment. Issues in Accounting Edu- cation, 6 (3), 205-217.


cation, 15, 151-165. Georgas, J. (1986). Cooperative, competitive, and
Johnson, A. P. (2000). Up and out: Using creative and individualistic goal structures with seventh-grade

critical thinking skills to enhance learning. Bos- Greek children: Problem-solving effectiveness and
ton: Allyn and Bacon. group interactions. Journal of Social Psychology,
Johnson, D. W., Skon, L., & Johnson, R. T. (1980). 126, 227-236.

Effects of cooperative, competitive, and indivi- Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhan-
dualistic conditions on children’s problem-sol- ces critical thinking. Journal of Technology Edu-
ving performance. American Educational Rese- cation, 7 (1). Retrieved on Jan 14, 2008 from
arch Journal, 17, 83-93. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v7n1/pdf/g
Jones, A. (2005). Culture and context: Critical thin- okhale.pdf.
king and student learning in introductory macro- Gray, R. J. (2006). Improving critical reading and
economics. Studies in Higher Education, 30 (3), critical thinking skills: What is Effective Pedagogy
339-354. in a College Learning Environment? Estrella Moun-
Khosravani, S., Manoochehri, H., & Memarian, tain Community College. Retrieved on Jan 14,
R. (2005). Developing critical thinking skills in 2008 from http://www.mcli.dist.Maricopa.edu/ mil/
nursing students by group dynamics. The Internet fcontent/2005-2006/gray_rpt.pdf.
Journal of Advanced Nursing Practice, 7 (2). Re- Herriman, J., Willetts, J. R., & Partridge, E. Y.

Journal of Iranian Psychologists -Vol. 5/ Issue 19/ Spring 2009


trieved on Jan 14, 2008 from http://www. ispub. (2006). Learning together for sustainability: The
com/ostia/index.php?xmlFilePath=journals/ijanp/ value of group based peer learning. Proceedings
vol7n2/skills.xml. of the 12th ANZSYS Conference, Sustaining our
Koppenhaver, G. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Struc- social and natural capital, ANZSYS, Katoomba,
turing the classroom for performance: Cooperative Australia, 406-420. Retrieved on Jan 14, 2008
learning with instructor-assigned teams. Decision from http://www.isf.uts.edu.au/publications/He-
Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 1 (1), rriman_Willetts_Pa12CD74.pdf.
1-21. Howard, V. M. (2007). A Comparison of educa-
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambrid- tional strategies for the acquisition of medical-
ge: Cambridge University Press. surgical nursing knowledge and critical thinking
Kunkel, J. G., & Shafer, W. E. (1997). Effects of skills: Human patient simulator vs. the interactive
student team learning in undergraduate auditing case study approach. PhD Dissertation, Adminis-

?6
affects students: Findings and insights from tw- courses. Journal of Education for Business, 72,
enty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jos- 197-200.
sey Bass. Lancaster, K., & Strand, C. (2001). Using the

Paul, R. (2005). The state of critical thinking today. team-learning model in a managerial accounting
New directions for community colleges, 130, 27- class: An experiment in cooperative learning.
40. Issues in Accounting Education, 16, 549-567.

Peters, M. W., Smith, M. F., & Smith, G. W. Lazarowitz, R., Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Baird, J.
(2002). Use of critical interactive thinking exer- H. (1994). Learning science in a cooperative set-
cises in teaching reproductive physiology to un- tling: Academic achievement and affective out-

dergraduate students. Journal of Animal Science, come. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
80 (3), 862-865. 31 (10), 1121-1131.
Ricketts, J., & Rudd, R. (2002). Critical thinking: Lewittes, H. (2007). Collaborative learning for cri-

A literature review. Florida, University of Florida. tical thinking. State University of N. Y, College
Retrieved on Jan 14, 2008 from http://step.ufl. at Old Westbury. Retrieved on Jan 14, 2008 from
edu/resources/critical_thinking/critical_litreview. http://www.aacu.org/meetings/generaleducation/

pdf. documents/Lewittes.pdf.
Ross, J. A. (1988). Improving social-environmental Lipman, M. (1988). Critical thinking: What it can
studies problem solving through cooperative be? Educational Leadership, 46 (1), 38-43.
learning. American Educational Research Jour- McConnell, D. A., Steer, D. N., Owens, K. D., &
nal, 25 (4), 573-591. Knight, C. C. (2005). How students think: Impli-
Rudd, R. M., Baker, D., & Hoover, T. (2000). Under- cations for learning in introductory geoscience cour-
graduate agriculture student learning styles and ses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53 (4), 462-
critical thinking abilities: Is there a relationship? 470.
Journal of Agricultural Education, 41 (3), 2-12. Nelson, C. (1994). Critical thinking and collabora-
Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, tive learning. In K. Bosworth & S. J. Hamilton
research and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. (Eds.), Collaborative learning : Underlying pro-
Tama, C. (1989). Critical thinking has a place in eve- cesses and effective techniques (pp. 45-58). San
/

ry classroom. Journal of Reading, 33, 64-65. Francisco: Jossey-Bass.


Thompson, P. M., Giedd, J. N., Woods, R. P., Mac- Norman, C. S., Rose, A. M., & Lehmann, C. M.
Donald, D., Evans, A. C., & Toga, A. W. (2004). Cooperative learning resources from the
(2000). Growth patterns in the developing brain business disciplines. Journal of Accounting Edu-
detected by using continuum mechanical tensor cation, 22 (1), 1-28.
maps. Nature, 404, 190–193. Norris, S. P., Ennis, R. H. (1989). Evaluating cri-
Torres, R., & Cano, J. (1995). Examining cognition tical thinking: Teaching thinking. CA: Midwest
levels of students enrolled in a college of agri- Publications.
culture. Journal of Agricultural Education, 36 (1), Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (1991). How college

?6q
Wells, J., Burton, A., & Burton, E. (2005). The OCR 46-54.
as level examination as a means of assessing the Van Delinder, J. L., & Weinberger, S. (2005). Using
critical thinking skills of undergraduate students : team-based Learning to teach teaching critical
A pilot study. Psychology learning and teaching thinking in undergraduate courses. Paper presen-
5 (1), 32-36. ted at the annual meeting of the American Socio-
Wiersema, N. (2000). How does collaborative lear- logical Association, Marriott Hotel, Loews Phila-
ning actually work in a classroom and how do stu- delphia Hotel, Philadelphia.
dents react to it? A Brief Reflection. Retrieved on Van Gelder, T. J. (2005). Teaching critical thinking:
Jan. 4, 2008 from http://www.city. londonmet.ac. Some lessons from cognitive science. College
k/deliberations/collab.learning/wiersema.html . Teaching, 45, 1-6.

Journal of Iranian Psychologists -Vol. 5/ Issue 19/ Spring 2009

?6

Potrebbero piacerti anche