Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
2020
Rationale
Schools Monitoring, Evaluation, and Adjustment (SMEA) has been
conducted quarterly in all 12 SDOs for the past two School Years. SMEA
presentation in the Regional Level was conducted Quarterly also in order to
evaluate data and obtain information that are the basis of the Regional Office for
Technical Assistance (TA) to all schools in the 12 SDOs. However, in order to have a
more comprehensive and complete picture of the situations in the 12 SDOs, some
available templates of the SMEA were revised, and additional tables are newly
introduced starting this school year 2020-2021. Moreover, one of the updates in
the SMEA presentation starting this school year 2020-2021 is the comparison of
data between the previous and current school years, and between two Quarters in
order to completely understand its trends and determine the impact of the
respective school-based initiated interventions for continuous improvement of the
12 SDOs in the region, particularly, in making adjustments in their plan, objectives,
strategies, and activities.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1
Mechanics on Data Presentation
The tables below are a guide for the SDOs on what data and what quarters
or months they shall compare, in order to have a clear picture and understanding
during SMEA presentation of the trends of the data and the impact of the
respective school-based intervention programs of each SDO. Each SDO shall use
the consolidated data as basis for comparison, and difference shall be used for
point of discussion. Below, are examples on how to treat and discuss the
comparison of the data of two school years or two quarters.
As can be gleaned in the table above, the data of enrolment by gender for
Grade 1 Level in Quarter 4 is shown where there are 1035 male students and 2566
female students, and with a total of 3601 students.
As depicted from the table above, it can be gleaned that the difference in the
number of male enrolment in July and October is -10, which means that the male
enrollees in the month of October is fewer than in the month of June by 10.
However, as observed further, the female enrollees has a difference of 15 which
means that there is an increase in the number of female enrollees in the month of
October as compared to the month of June. Thus, for the total difference, it can be
observed that it increases by 5 students from the month of June to the month of
October.
Another example below is for percentage data.
Enrolment of Current
Grade Total Completers %
SY
Level
M F T M F T M F T
Grade 1 1045 2353 3398 1035 2332 3367 99.04% 99.11% 99.09%
- - - - - - - - -
As shown in the table above, there are 1,035 male completers which
comprises 99.04% among the total male enrollees for the current school year.
Moreover, there are 2,332 female completers which comprises 99.11% among the
female enrollees in the current school year. In total, there are 3,367 Grade 1
completers and it comprises 99.09% among the total enrolment.
As reflected in the table above, the results show that the difference of the
number and percentage of male completers are 7 and 0.66 percentage points,
respectively, which means that there is a slight increase in the number and
percentage points of male completers. While the number and percentage of female
completers have 2 and 0.68 difference, respectively, which means that the number
of female completers has also increased in the current school year. Over-all, it can
be gleaned from the table above that the total difference of the number and
percentage of completers have increased for about 9 and 0.69 percentage points,
respectively, from the previous year to current school year.
The tables below are a guide for the SDOs as to what data to be gathered
and in what months or school years to be compared.
SECTION 2
KRA1- ACCESS TEMPLATES
JULY CURRENT SY
VS MARCH PREVIOUS SY JUNE CURRENT SY JULY CURRENT SY
OCTOBER CURRENT SY VS VS VS
VS JUNE CURRENT SY JULY CURRENT SY OCTOBER CURRENT SY
MARCH CURRENT SY
As can be seen from the table above, the main data to be gathered is the
number of completers, these are the learners who completed the school year after
enrolling in the month of June of the said school year. However, total enrolment
shall be collected also in order to determine the percentage of completers.
The table above shows the data to be gathered which is the repetition rate
of the learners. Repetition rate means the percentage of the number of students
who repeated the grade level of the current school year same as the previous school
year. In order to get the repetition rate, the total number of repeaters of every grade
level in the current school year shall be divided by the total enrolment of every
grade level of the previous school year then multiply by 100.
The table above shows the data to be gathered related to the common
Dental and Oral health problems among learners in the schools. The main data to
be gathered are the number of learners in each type of Dental and Oral Health
problem across all grade levels.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
NUMBER OF LEARNERS IN NUMBER OF LEARNERS IN
NONE NONE VS NONE
PREVIOUS SY CURRENT SY
As can be seen in the table above that the main data to be gathered are
the number and percentage of learners with 80% or more attendance in the current
school year. Moreover, enrolment of current school year shall be provided also in
order for the percentage of learners with 80% or more attendance in a school year
be determined.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
JUNE-SEPTEMBER OF CURRENT SY
JUNE-SEPTEMBER OF CURRENT SY
VS
JUNE-SEPTEMBER OF VS
OCTOBER-DECEMBER OF CURRENT SY NONE
CURRENT SY OCTOBER-DECEMBER OF CURRENT
VS
SY
JANUARY-MARCH OF CURRENT SY
As stated in the table above, the data to be gathered are the number and
percentages of enrollees in all special curricular programs in Junior High School.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
FAILURE RATE 1ST GRADING PERIOD OF CURRENT SY
VS FAILURE RATE 1ST GRADING
FAILURE RATE
FAILURE RATE 2ND GRADING PERIOD OF CURRENT SY PERIOD OF CURRENT SY
1ST GRADING
VS NONE VS
PERIOD OF
FAILURE RATE 3RD GRADING PERIOD OF CURRENT SY FAILURE RATE 2ND GRADING
CURRENT SY
VS PERIOD OF CURRENT SY
FAILURE RATE 4TH GRADING PERIOD OF CURRENT SY
The data are to be presented in three quarters: Quarter 3, Quarter 4, and
Quarter 1. There is no comparison of data in Q3, while in Q4 and Q1 data shall be
compared to its preceding quarter.
Table A.25: Number of Research Studies
The table above shows the data to be gathered which are the number of
researches conducted in a given school year. The researchers are classified into
teaching and non-teaching personnel and the type of research which are the Action
Research and the Basic Research. Moreover, the number of research studies which
are funded by either Basic Education Research Fund (BERF) or by other Funds
such as Special Education Fund (SEF), or No Funds at all are needed to be
gathered also in order to monitor the research studies of those researchers that
need to be funded. Furthermore, number of researches that are presented in any
research forum shall also be gathered along with the number of research studies
published in any publication.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
NUMBER OF ACTION NUMBER OF ACTION
RESEARCHES, BASIC RESEARCHES, BASIC
RESEARCHES, AND THE TOTAL VS RESEARCHES, AND THE TOTAL NONE NONE NONE
RESEARCH STUDIES OF RESEARCH STUDIES OF
PREVIOUS SY CURRENT SY
SECTION 3
KRA2- QUALITY TEMPLATES
The table above shows the data to be gathered in the field which are the
literacy level of students in both English and Filipino Subjects. Pre-test shall be
conducted in early days of the current school year so that students will be
classified in three types of literacy level and these are the Frustration Level,
Instructional Level, and the Independent Level. Afterwards, Post-test shall be done
after the intervention program has been conducted.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
JUNE OF MARCH OF CURRENT JUNE OF CURRENT
VS NONE NONE
CURRENT SY SY SCHOOL YEAR
The table above shows the Mean Percentage Score (MPS) of Quarterly
Exams of all subjects per Grade level in Junior High School. It can be noted further
that Average MPS shall be gathered in order to assess the performance of the
students for a quarter across all subjects and across all grade levels per subject.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
PRE-TEST MPS OF POST-TEST MPS OF PRE-TEST MPS OF
VS NONE NONE
CURRENT SY CURRENT SY CURRENT SY
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
1ST GRADING GPA OF CURRENT SY
VS
1ST GRADING GPA OF CURRENT SY
2ND GRADING GPA OF CURRENT SY
1ST GRADING GPA VS
VS NONE
OF CURRENT SY 2ND GRADING GPA OF
3RD GRADING GPA OF CURRENT SY
CURRENT SY
VS
4TH GRADING GPA OF CURRENT SY
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Table Q.7: National Achievement Test (NAT) for Grade 6 and Grade 10
As shown in the table below, National Achievement Test Mean, Standard
Deviation, and MPS for Grade 6 and Grade 10 shall be gathered as the main data.
Moreover, Level of Proficiency shall be determined also to complete the information
regarding the performance of the learners in the said test.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
3RD AND 4TH GRADING LEAST 1ST GRADING LEAST 2ND GRADING LEAST
MASTERED COMPETENCIES OF NONE MASTERED COMPETENCIES MASTERED COMPETENCIES
CURRENT SY OF CURRENT SY OF CURRENT SY
11
12
As stated in the table above, it can be seen that the following data are to
be gathered and these are the ratios between the learners/schools and the
functional libraries, Science laboratories, TLE Laboratories, and ICT Laboratories.
As can be observed from the table above, it can be seen that the main
data to be gathered are related to the Results-Based Performance Management
System (RPMS) using the IPCR/OPCR of the Teaching, Non-Teaching, and School
Heads in all SDOs. Specifically, the said data are the frequency counts of each
adjectival rating in the RPMS namely Outstanding, Very Satisfactory, Satisfactory,
Unsatisfactory, and Poor, where the personnel are classified. It can be noted
further that total number of personnel in every adjectival rating shall be
accomplished for a clear and comprehensive presentation.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
DATA OF DATA OF CURRENT
NONE VS NONE NONE
PREVIOUS SY SY
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
DATA OF DATA OF
NONE VS NONE NONE
PREVIOUS SY CURRENT SY
Table G.14: Awards and Recognition
The data to be gathered in the table below are the awards and recognitions
received by the Students, Teachers, School Heads, and School.
As can be seen from the table above, it can be observed that the main data
to be gathered is the Learner-Teacher ratio across all grade levels. The data would
tell us if we have shortage or enough teachers to take good care of our ever growing
number of students in our respective divisions.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
DATA AS OF JUNE OF CURRENT SY
DATA AS OF JUNE OF VS
NONE NONE
CURRENT SY DATA AS OF SEPTEMBER OF CURRENT
SY
The data shall be presented in Quarter 2 and Quarter 3 only. Data in Q2
shall be presented without any comparison to a certain data, while presentation in
Q3, data in Q2 shall be compared to the data in Q3.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
DATA OF DATA OF CURRENT
NONE VS NONE NONE
PREVIOUS SY SY
Table G.20: Teachers’ Professional Development
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
DATA OF DATA OF CURRENT
NONE VS NONE NONE
PREVIOUS SY SY
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
DATA FOR JUNE TO SEPT OF CURRENT SY
VS DATA FOR JUNE TO DATA FOR JUNE DATA FOR
DATA FOR OCT-DEC OF CURRENT SY NONE SEPTEMBER OF TO SEPTEMBER VS OCT-DEC OF
VS CURRENT SY OF CURRENT SY CURRENT SY
DATA FOR JAN-MAR OF CURRENT SY
Table G.23: School Heads’ Professional Development
As can be observed from the table above, it can be gleaned that the data to
be gathered are the number and the percentages of the School Heads who were
sent to trainings related to School Leadership, Personal and Professional Attributes
and Interpersonal Effectiveness, Instructional Leadership, Student-Centered
Learning, Human Resource management and Professional Development, Parent
Involvement and Community partnership, School Management Operations, and
Others. School Heads are classified as Elementary School Heads, Junior High
School heads, and Senior High School Heads. Furthermore, data as to how many
and its percentages of school heads who were not sent to training shall also be
complied in order to assess how much left of our school heads that need training in
the future.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
DATA OF DATA OF CURRENT
NONE VS NONE NONE
PREVIOUS SY SY
Based from the table above, the data shall be presented in Quarter 2 where
data of previous school year shall be compared to the data of the current school
year.
The table above shows the data to be gathered related to the Teacher
Induction Program, Professional Learning and Development, Employee Welfare, and
Performance Management System. Under the Teacher Induction Program (TIP) date
of conduct shall be specified, then the number of Newly-Hired Teachers undergone
the said program, and the number of non-teaching personnel given the Induction
Program. Moreover, under the Professional Learning and Development are the
number of Needs-based/Competency-based PDP developed and implemented by
the Division or School Non-teaching and Teaching-related Personnel. For the
employee welfare, number of persons with disability and the number of schools
implementing utilization of Financial Literacy Learning Resources in school data
shall be complied also. As to the Performance Management System, the date of the
Conducted RPMS Orientation Rollout shall be accomplished for consolidation.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
DATA OF DATA OF CURRENT
NONE VS NONE NONE
PREVIOUS SY SY
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
DATA OF PREVIOUS SCHOOL DATA OF CURRENT
NONE NONE NONE
YEAR SCHOOL YEAR