Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
If a country has same national curriculum then the number of idiosyncratic children
will reduce in college, when we have different curriculum i.e. state curriculum, then
children will study some subjects that are not taught in other states and vice versa,
this increases number of uniqueness of children entering college. On the other hand,
if country has same national curriculum then, these students would have studied
same courses and they all will have a similar approach towards a particular problem.
Some people might argue that implementing state-wise curriculum is less beneficial
than same national curriculum. For instance, when students are entering in colleges
they have to follow same curriculum i.e. if students are enrolling themselves for
computer engineering, people from different curriculums would have studied
different programming language, some may know Java, some may know python,
some may know C++.If according to the college, for persuing subjects of computer
science everybody must be familiar with C++, then this creates a problem for the
teachers, but these people are not considering that students can learn the basics of
the required language i.e. C++, with their extra effort and this will help them in
future too. This creates a lot of possibilities for students thus different curriculum is
beneficial for students.
I feel that a state-wise curriculum is better and more advantageous than same
national curriculum because it increases idiosyncrasies among children and help
them to develop different set of skills rathen than having same skills.