Veoblem Se} Five astagy- Avon Savathy kasut- ken Gao Wart +o sh mf 23e~ Hitched Funqy _ os) _ ) VAS - Back Shen “sys l> oes y- ¢Gsy= t- | wee ,; es 4 ae e : _3 I4e> lee? We Te = e \ =e | ew | TS. pet - e+ ite We e> - Cre) @)- O) (co). (ey N A A co u —N Ft Cr tL. ' pacer 2b. * a VY log P(ZIX,B) = BT Va tog PCRS Ft = Pee 2 (tele) = - 45:2 eu)2c. 2 log P(BLX, 8) = Gs © (4278) $0 os per (2b), From there, d (2. tog PCR IX, >): 2 (Zoos) Ow aa b = 28 (ce (8 x y)si Xia s 2,(0- 6 (2H) axa: Suxib 4% ” = =D g' (4p TK) Ge%ea%ien = ~De Gie)[ - © (eee tt ot) iki oT Given Heck, we Know Phok Sy RE ts a matx. We hove, deaved My , the — Hesstan when we evalvete the bffecen tered — gre vecbsloty od dhe ath pes toy and then theo gestion, Thet s, of to He Hessian ot some index Cab). we know od ty nd became X~ > dal end Tay Ved, 50 the fou lterf answer om a dad Hessvan wed x Vhs, we con generalize te et He - Fob me} wf ~ 7 Git ale RR ory2d. We Wow that ofeG) 24 n $o ao - o 6) | Sow u=1 poss ve Gustent Cor zero if céye4), Ther mS because Xie soa moti, Wwe btew Hhed owe hadrix ty Qasr hve, But be case of the veseutivg stg befave the Summ ation , the yesa Leng mahi neqedive or Bo0, sg Hoty negative semi ~ de Fruite,