Sei sulla pagina 1di 5

Endogenous Cortisol and Lung Damage in a

Predominantly Smoking Population


KIMBERLEY D. CLARK, NIGEL WARDROBE-WONG, and PHILLIP D. SNASHALL
Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medical Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne; and Departments of
Cardio-respiratory Medicine and Radiology, North Tees General Hospital, Stockton on Tees, Cleveland, United Kingdom

We examined the association of endogenous corticosteroid status with lung structure and function in
a cross-sectional and longitudinal study in response to a recent finding of a relationship between
plasma cortisol and rate of annual decline in airway function. We recruited 74 cigarette-smoking and
20 never-smoking volunteers 35 to 65 yr of age after publicity in local media. Exclusion criteria were
FEV1 , 1.5 L or a history of airway disease. We performed spirometry and a high resolution CT lung
scan and measured CO transfer, serum cortisol, and 24-h urinary cortisol excretion. There were no
differences in serum or urinary cortisol between those with and those without low FEV1, low KCO, or
high resolution CT (HRCT) emphysema, except that urinary cortisol was 19% higher in subjects with
HRCT emphysema (p 5 0.05). Log urinary cortisol/body weight was negatively correlated with KCO
(p 5 0.000) and KCO was lower in the highest tertile of urinary cortisol (p 5 0.001). Subjects were re-
studied after 520 6 69 d. Changes in FEV1 and KCO showed no significant correlations with serum or
urinary cortisol. We conclude that airway function does not relate to serum or urinary cortisol, but
there may be a relationship between cortisol excretion and emphysema. Clark KD, Wardrobe-
Wong N, Snashall PD. Endogenous cortisol and lung damage in a predominantly smoking
population. AM J RESPIR CRIT CARE MED 1999;159:755–759.

An analysis of longitudinal data from the Normative Aging METHODS


Study showed an inverse relationship between rate of decline
Subjects
of FEV1 and plasma cortisol concentration in smoking, ex-
smoking, and nonsmoking men (1). In men in the lower third Seventy-four current cigarette smokers (5 or more cigarettes/d) aged
35 to 65 yr of age (mean age, 51.3 6 7.5 yr; M 38, F 36) and 20 lifetime
of the cortisol range the rate of decline of FEV1 was on aver-
nonsmoking control subjects (mean age, 50.7 6 8.1 yr; M 7, F 13) were
age eight times greater than in those in the upper third, but de- recruited after publicity in local media. All subjects were white. Ex-
spite this striking difference baseline FEV1 did not differ sig- clusion criteria were a FEV1 , 1.5 L, history of asthma, bronchodila-
nificantly between cortisol tertiles. tor or corticosteroid medication, and use of other tobacco products.
Therapeutic doses of systemically administered corticoste- The study was approved by the North Tees Local Research Ethics
riods may stabilize airway function in COPD (2), perhaps by Committee. Subjects were recruited after reading a description of the
suppressing inflammatory changes that lead to damage (3), study and possible risks. Consent was written. Subjects were informed
but studies of basal plasma cortisol in COPD have shown no of their results and encouraged to stop smoking.
significant differences from normal (4–7).
Lung Function
We have reexamined the association between endogenous
corticosteroid status and lung disease in a cross-sectional and Forced spirometry and CO transfer were measured seated using auto-
longitudinal study of a predominantly smoking population of mated apparatus (Model TTUSA; PK Morgan, Chatham, Kent, UK).
Expiratory flow-volume curves were recorded from a computerized
both sexes, excluding subjects with known obstructive lung
dry rolling-seal spirometer. The forced expiratory maneuver was re-
disease. We have looked at the relationship of aspects of lung peated until duplicate estimates of FVC and FEV1 were within 5% of
structure and function to serum cortisol concentration and uri- each other; we accepted the highest value. CO transfer was measured
nary cortisol excretion. by the single-breath method (8) using a 9-s breathhold time. Duplicate
measurements were accepted where estimates of TLCO and effective
alveolar volume (VA) were within 5%; CO transfer coefficient (KCO)
was derived (5 TLCO/VA). Hemoglobin was measured, and in all cases
(Received in original form September 22, 1997 and in revised form August 31, 1998) was within the normal range.
Supported in part by a grant from the Northern & Yorkshire Region NHS Execu- Predicted lung function values used were from Roberts and col-
tive. leagues (9) based on a similar white, urban, nonsmoking population.
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Professor P. D.
Snashall, Department of Medicine, North Tees General Hospital, Stockton on
Lung Structure
Tees, Cleveland TS19 8PE, UK. High resolution CT (HRCT) scanning was performed using an IGE
Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 159. pp 755–759, 1999 Sytec 3000i CT scanner. Three 1-mm cuts from the upper, middle, and
Internet address: www.atsjournals.org lower zones of the right lung were taken at TLC. Images were ana-
756 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 159 1999

TABLE 1 ear regression were used to examine the relationships of lung functional
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY SAMPLE* and structural variables to cortisol. A p value , 0.05 was accepted as
significant. In line with this, for the lower limit of normality of FEV1
Characteristic Smokers Nonsmokers p Value Total Group and KCO, we adopted (mean, 1.645 SD). Values below this will occur
by chance on 5% of occasions in a normal population (9).
Number 74 20 — 94
Age, yr 51.3 (7.5) 50.7 (8.11) 0.76 51.2 (7.58)
Serum cortisol, nmol/ml 371.7 (87.6) 337.7 (69.3) 0.11 364.5 (84.9) RESULTS
Urinary cortisol, nmol/24 h 170.4 (61.4) 191.6 (45.7) 0.17 175.1 (58.7)
Cross-Sectional Study
FEV1, L 3.01 (0.87) 3.43 (0.63) 0.05 3.1 (0.84)
FVC, L 4.0 (0.98) 4.18 (0.87) 0.46 4.04 (0.96) Lung function and HRCT findings. The lung function vari-
KCO, kPa/s 1.41 (0.28) 1.63 (0.27) 0.01 1.46 (0.30) ables FEV1 and KCO were significantly reduced in the smoking
FEV1, % pred 93.9 (15.1) 108.2 (10.8) 0.00 97.0 (15.4) group (Table 1). In 10 smokers FEV1 was abnormally low, one
FVC, % pred 96.8 (10.6) 101.9 (10.3) 0.06 97.9 (10.7)
of whom also had a low KCO; KCO was low in a further nine
KCO, % pred 86.8 (17.7) 100.4 (16.8) 0.01 89.9 (18.3)
smokers. HRCT scanning demonstrated mild emphysema (in-
* Values in parentheses are standard deviations. The p values are for the differences volving , 25% of the lung parenchyma) in 18 smokers, severe
between smoking and nonsmoking groups.
emphysema (involving . 75% of parenchyma) in one. Six em-
physematous smokers had a low KCO. Lung function and
structure was normal in the nonsmoking volunteers.
Effect of smoking on cortisol. Mean serum cortisol, ad-
lyzed independently by two radiologists using the criteria of Remy- justed for age and sex, and urinary cortisol, adjusted for age,
Jardin and colleagues (10). sex, and body weight did not differ significantly between
smoking and nonsmoking subjects (Table 1).
Serum Cortisol
Cortisol levels with lung damage. There were no significant
Measurements of serum cortisol were made (three measurements in differences in adjusted serum cortisol concentration between
70, two in 15, and one in nine) on separate days. Subjects attended the subjects with and without low FEV1, low KCO or HRCT em-
laboratory between 8:15 and 9:00 A.M. after an overnight fast and an
abstinence from smoking of at least 8 h. Subjects lay supine for 30 min
physema (Table 2). Serum cortisol tended to be higher in sub-
before venepuncture. Blood samples were centrifuged immediately, jects with a low FEV1 (p 5 0.09). Adjusted urinary cortisol
and serum was frozen at 2208 C until determination of cortisol con- was 19% higher in subjects with HRCT emphysema (p 5
centration. Serum cortisol was measured by enzyme-immunological 0.05); otherwise there were no significant differences of uri-
assay using a Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 immunoassay analyser nary cortisol between groups, but there were tendencies for
(Boehringer Mannheim Immunodiagnostics, Lewes, Sussex, UK). urinary cortisol to be higher in subjects with low KCO (p 5
0.09). The mean coefficient of variation of repeat serum corti-
24-Hour Urinary Cortisol sol measurements was 12.8%.
Eighty-six subjects (19 nonsmokers, 67 smokers) successfully col- Correlations of cortisol with FEV1 and KCO. In multiple lin-
lected their urine for 24 h. Urinary volume was measured and the con- ear regression (with age, sex, and smoking status) log urinary
centration of cortisol ascertained by means of a cortisol-125I radioim- cortisol/body weight showed a significant negative correlation
munoassay (Orion Diagnostica, Espoo, Finland).
with KCO (p 5 0.000) (Table 3). The correlation was similarly
Longitudinal Study significant with urinary cortisol and log urinary cortisol. Oth-
erwise neither lung function variable showed any significant
Fifty-seven subjects (M/F 5 26⁄31; 39 smokers, 18 nonsmokers) at-
tended for repeat measurement of lung function after a mean interval relationship to serum or urinary cortisol.
of 520 6 69 d. FEV1 and KCO by tertile of serum and urinary cortisol.
There were no significant differences in lung function between
Statistics tertiles of serum cortisol (Table 4). However, a significant dif-
The data were analyzed using a statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chi- ference was seen in KCO between tertiles of urinary cortisol/
cago, IL). Unadjusted data from smokers and nonsmokers were com- body weight, KCO being 21% lower in the highest tertile than
pared using an unpaired t test. Analysis of covariance and multiple lin- in the lowest.

TABLE 2
ADJUSTED MEAN SERUM* AND URINARY† CORTISOL CONCENTRATION BY CIGARETTE
SMOKING STATUS, WITH AND WITHOUT LUNG DAMAGE

Serum Cortisol Urinary Cortisol


(nmol/ml) (nmol/24 h)

Smoking Subjects Subjects


Status (n) Mean SE p Value (n) Mean SE p Value

Nonsmoker 74 336 15.5 67 195 10.5


0.08 0.08
Smoker 20 373 10.2 19 167 7.5
FEV1, normal 83 361 9.2 77 175 6.7
0.09 0.87
FEV1, low 10 410 27.4 9 172 20.3
HRCT, normal 75 380 10.0 68 164 6.8
0.13 0.05
HRCT, emphysema 19 344 18.3 18 195 15.8
KCO, normal 81 361 9.6 74 170 7.1
0.43 0.09
KCO, low 10 384 26.3 9 184 13.0

* Adjusted for age, sex, and (except for smoker/nonsmoker comparison) smoking.

Adjusted for age, sex, weight, and (except for smoker/nonsmoker comparison) smoking.
Clark, Wardrobe-Wong, and Snashall: Endogenous Cortisol and Lung Damage 757

TABLE 3
RESULTS OF LINEAR REGRESSION MODELS RELATING LEVELS OF
FEV1 AND TO SELECTED COVARIATES (n 5 94)

FEV1 KCO
(L) (kPa/s)

Regression Regression
Independent Variables Coefficient SE p Value Coefficient SE p Value

Age, yr 20.040 0.007 0.000 20.004 0.004 0.342


Height, m 3.856 1.013 0.000 21.460 0.560 0.011
Sex 0.525 0.192 0.008 0.173 0.106 0.107
Smoking status 20.428 0.141 0.003 20.302 0.078 0.000
Log serum cortisol, nmol/ml 0.082 0.530 0.878 20.154 0.293 0.601
Log urinary cortisol/body weight, nmol/24 h/kg 20.262 0.343 0.447 20.716 0.190 0.000
Constant 21.789 2.223 0.423 4.633 1.230 0.000

Longitudinal Study (33%) men, excluding subjects with chronic diseases, including
Decline of lung function and cortisol. On multiple linear re- bronchitis and asthma. Sparrow and colleagues (1) were also
gression (Table 5) there were no significant relationships be- at pains to establish the normality of volunteers’ endocrine
tween decline of FEV1 or KCO, and either serum or urinary and gonadal systems. We studied smokers (79%) and never-
cortisol. There were no significant differences in rate of de- smokers (21%) of both sexes. We excluded ex-smokers and
cline of FEV1 (adjusted for height, age, sex, smoking status, subjects with a diagnosis of asthma or COPD or receiving
and initial FEV1) or of rate of decline of KCO (adjusted for medication for these conditions, and subjects with a FEV1 be-
age, sex, smoking status, and initial KCO) between tertiles of low 1.5 L. We made no selection on the basis of endocrine sta-
serum or urinary cortisol (Table 6). tus. Mean age of subjects in the two studies were similar, and
FEV1 values were almost identical.
It is not stated whether any of the men in the study of Spar-
DISCUSSION
row and colleagues had abnormally low lung function results.
We have failed to demonstrate any relationship between se- In our population, despite exclusion criteria, we found 10
rum cortisol and lung function. Specifically, we have not con- smokers with an abnormally low FEV1. Plasma cortisol tended
firmed the previous observation (1) that FEV1 declines more to be higher in those with reduced FEV1 (p 5 0.09), the re-
rapidly in subjects with low normal serum cortisol, nor could verse of what would be expected from the data of Sparrow
we demonstrate an effect of cortisol on baseline FEV1. Our and colleagues.
findings are therefore in line with studies showing normal Although Sparrow and colleagues (1) describe their study
plasma cortisol concentrations in COPD (4–7). as prospective, it is part of a wider study on gonadal function
We have to consider why our study and that of Sparrow performed 18 yr prior to publication (11). They do not state
and colleagues (1) have come to such different conclusions. whether they set out with the hypothesis that serum cortisol is
Volunteers for both studies were obtained by media advertise- a factor determining rate of FEV1 decline or whether the rela-
ment, and may therefore not be typical of their populations. tionship emerged fortuitously from their analysis. This is very
Our advertisements stated that we were studying the effects of relevant to the statistical interpretation of their finding.
smoking on the lung, and this may have encouraged participa- Sparrow and colleagues suggest that the rate of decline of
tion of subjects who were concerned about their respiratory FEV1 in subjects in the lowest tertile of serum cortisol concen-
health, and it is therefore possible that our study population tration is 71.6 ml/yr faster than in subjects in the highest ter-
was enriched with smokers with incipient COPD. It is unclear tile. They measured this over a 4.7-yr period, but clearly such a
whether selection bias of a comparable nature applied to difference would have to operate for longer to produce signifi-
Sparrow’s volunteers. The study of Sparrow and colleagues cant airflow obstruction. If we make the modest assumption
was on smoking (25%), ex-smoking (42%), and never-smoking that this difference has been maintained in the study group for

TABLE 4
ADJUSTED* MEAN LEVELS OF PULMONARY FUNCTION BY TERTILE OF SERUM
CORTISOL AND BY TERTILE OF URINARY CORTISOL/BODY WEIGHT

FEV1 (L) KCO (kPa/s)

n Mean SE p Value Mean SE p Value

Tertile of serum cortisol concentration, nmol/ml


I (172.3–319.7) 31 3.14 0.16 1.47 0.05
II (320–395) 32 3.03 0.14 NS 1.43 0.06 0.475
III (397.5–598.3) 31 3.14 0.15 1.53 0.06
Tertile of urinary cortisol/body weight, nmol/24 h/kg
I (0.74–2.08) 29 3.18 0.17 1.63 0.07
II (2.1–2.74) 28 3.14 0.17 NS 1.39 0.05 0.001
III (2.77–4.23) 29 3.07 0.14 1.35 0.05

* FEV1 adjusted for age, height, smoking, and sex; KCO adjusted for age, sex, and smoking status.
758 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 159 1999

TABLE 5
RESULTS OF LINEAR REGRESSION MODELS RELATING MEAN ANNUAL
CHANGE IN FEV1 AND KCO TO SELECTED COVARIATES

DFEV1 (L) DKCO (kPa/s)

Regression Regression
Independent Variable Coefficient SE p Value Coefficient SE p Value

Age, yr 0.002 0.002 0.41 20.002 0.002 0.27


Sex 20.21 0.039 0.60 20.002 0.032 0.93
Smoking status 20.058 0.030 0.061 20.086 0.033 0.01
Height, M 0.401 0.218 0.073
Initial pulmonary function* 0.004 0.021 0.836 0.005 7.92 204 0.00
Log10 serum cortisol, ng/ml 0.208 0.125 0.105 0.002 0.155 0.99
Log10 urinary cortisol, nmol/24 h/kg 0.025 0.095 0.794 0.170 0.120 0.17
Constant 21.111 0.520 0.039 20.662 0.467 0.16

* Initial FEV1 (L) or initial KCO (kPa/s).

10 yr we would expect to see a 715-ml difference between ter- active free cortisol (12) despite intersubject differences in the
tiles in the cross-sectional study. With the standard deviation renal tubular handling of cortisol. We were unable to show
of adjusted FEV1 (700 ml) we have a 90% chance of detecting any significant relationship between cortisol excretion and
the difference at the 1% level of significance with 31 subjects FEV1 in either cross-sectional or longitudinal parts of the
in each tertile. Our observed difference was 0 ml. The likeli- study. Unexpectedly, we have demonstrated an inverse rela-
hood of a Type II error is low. By the same token Sparrow and tionship between urinary cortisol excretion and KCO; low KCO
colleagues should have observed a significant difference be- is associated with the highest tertile of urinary cortisol excre-
tween tertiles in their cross-sectional study. Their observed tion. Although highly statistically significant (p 5 0.001), the
difference was 240 ml (p 5 0.08) but some of this arose be- finding needs to be treated with caution since we had no prior
cause their cross-sectional data were gleaned from both first hypothesis in this area. We assume that emphysema was the
and second lung function measurements (depending on which main cause of reduced KCO in this population; urinary cortisol
measurement was temporally closest to the cortisol measure- excretion seemed to be significantly elevated in smokers with
ment). Thus, their cross-sectional data include measurements HRCT emphysema (p 5 0.05), but a higher level of signifi-
affected by the rapid change observed in the longitudinal study. cance is required since we made multiple statistical compari-
Clearly their cross-sectional data are not compatible with a sub- sons of cortisol with smoking, lung function, and structure.
stantial difference in rate of decline being maintained for more With one exception, smokers with emphysema were asymp-
than a few years. tomatic, and it is therefore unlikely that cortisol excretion was
By comparison with the previous study (1) our longitudinal increased by the stress of illness. Because there was a trend for
study lacks statistical power because we were not able to ex- urinary cortisol to be lower in smokers, it is unlikely that the
tend follow-up as long as we would have wished. The short in- relationship with emphysema is due to smoking.
terval between measurements has meant a larger standard de- No coherent pattern has emerged from the literature on
viation of the adjusted change in FEV1 compared with the the effect of smoking on serum or urinary cortisol. We found
study of Sparrow and colleagues. We calculate that there was no significant differences in serum or urinary cortisol between
an 85% chance of finding a difference of the magnitude that smokers and nonsmokers. Others have found serum/plasma
Sparrow and colleagues found at the 0.05 level of significance. cortisol to be elevated (13–15) or lowered (16) or unchanged
Our observed difference between tertiles was 21 ml/yr (higher (1) in smokers, whereas urinary cortisol was found to be higher
in the lowest cortisol tertile). The difference was nonsignifi- in smokers (17). Smoking induces oxidative mechanisms re-
cant, but clearly there is a real possibility of a Type II error. sponsible for cortisol metabolism, but excretion of 6-b-hydroxy-
Urinary cortisol gives a better indication of the biologically cortisol was the same in smokers and nonsmokers (18).

TABLE 6
ADJUSTED* MEAN ANNUAL CHANGE IN PULMONARY FUNCTION BY TERTILE OF SERUM CORTISOL
CONCENTRATION AND BY TERTILE OF URINARY CORTISOL/BODY WEIGHT

DFEV1 (L) Adjusted for Covariates DKCO (kPa/s) Adjusted for Covariates

n Mean SE p Value Mean SE p Value

Tertile of serum cortisol concentration, ng/ml


I (172–318) 19 0.055 0.03 0.088 0.03
II (319–383) 19 0.050 0.02 0.89 0.053 0.03 0.57
III (386–519) 19 0.034 0.03 0.079 0.03
Tertile of urinary cortisol/body weight,
nmol/24 h/kg
I (1.16–2.27) 16 0.063 0.03 0.041 0.04
II (2.29–2.72) 17 0.001 0.02 0.21 0.092 0.03 0.40
III (2.77–4.17) 17 0.072 0.03 0.073 0.02

* FEV1 adjusted for height, age, sex, smoking status, and initial FEV1; KCO adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, and initial KCO.
Clark, Wardrobe-Wong, and Snashall: Endogenous Cortisol and Lung Damage 759

In conclusion, we have failed to confirm the findings of Seed. 1991. Reference values and prediction equations for normal lung
Sparrow and colleagues (1), but we have demonstrated a ten- function in a non-smoking white urban population. Thorax 46:643–650.
10. Remy-Jardin, M., J. Remy, C. Boulenguez, A. Sobaszek, A. J.-L. Edme,
dency for urinary cortisol excretion to be higher in smokers
and D. Furon. 1993. Morphologic effects of cigarette smoking on air-
with emphysema and in subjects with reduced KCO. ways and pulmonary parenchyma in healthy adult volunteers: CT
evaluation and correlation with pulmonary function tests. Radiology
186:107–115.
References 11. Sparrow, D., R. Bosse, and J. W. Rowe. 1980. The influence of age, alco-
1. Sparrow, D., G. T. O’Connor, B. Rosner, D. Demolles, and S. T. Weiss. hol consumption and body build on gonadal function in men. J. Clin.
1993. A longitudinal study of plasma cortisol concentration and pul- Endocrinol. Metab. 51:508–512.
monary function decline in men. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 147:1345–1348. 12. Williams, G. H., and R. G. Dluhy. 1994. Diseases of the adrenal cortex.
2. Postma, D. S., I. Peters, E. J. Steenhuis, and H. J. Sluiter. 1988. Moder- In K. J. Isselbacher, E. Braunwald, J. D. Wilson, J. B. Martin, A. S.
ately severe chronic airflow obstruction: can corticosteroids slow Fauci, and D. L. Kasper, editors. Harrison’s Principles of Internal
down obstruction? Eur. Respir. J. 1:22–26. Medicine. McGraw-Hill, New York. 1953–1955.
3. Wright, J. L., L. M. Lawson, P. D. Pare, B. J. Wiggs, S. Kennedy, and 13. Field, A., G. Colditz, W. Willett, C. Longcope, and J. B. McKinlay. 1994.
J. C. Hogg. 1983. Morphology of peripheral airways in current smok- The relation of smoking, age, relative weight, and dietary intake to se-
ers and ex-smokers. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 127:474–477. rum adrenal steriods, sex hormones, and sex hormone-binding globu-
4. Voisin, C., P. Fossati, F. Wattel, J. LeFebvre, M. Racadot, A. B. Tonnel, lin in middle-aged men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 79:1310–1316.
and J. C. LeLeu. 1970. La reponse cortico-surrenalienne au cours des 14. Baron, J., R. J. Comi, V. Cryns, T. Brinck-Johnsen, and N. G. Mercer.
episodes de decompensation survenant chez l’insuffisant respiratoire 1995. The effect of cigarette smoking on adrenal cortical hormones. J.
chronique. Lille Med. 15:1367–1374. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 272:151–155.
5. Cornil, A., D. Glinoer, R. Leclercq, and G. Copinschi. 1975. Adrenocor- 15. Kirschbaum, C., E. Gonzalez Bono, N. Rohleder, C. Gessener, K. M.
tical and somatotrophic secretions in acute and chronic respiratory in- Pirke, A. Salvador, and D. H. Hellhammer. 1987. Effects of fasting
sufficiency. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 112:77–81. and glucose load on free cortisol responses to stress and nicotine. J.
6. Semple, P.d’A., G. H. Beastall, W. S. Watson, and R. Hume. 1981. Hy- Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 82:1101–1105.
pothalamic-pituitary dysfunction in respiratory hypoxia. Thorax 36: 16. Handa, K., S. Kono, H. Ishii, K. Shinchi, K. Imanishi, and K. Arakawa.
605–609. 1994. Relationship of alcohol consumption and smoking to plasma
7. Gimenez, M., T. Mohan-Kumar, J. C. Humbert, N. De Talances, M. cortisol and blood pressure. J. Hum. Hypertens. 8:891–894.
Teboul, J. L. Ponz, and J. M. Polu. 1987. Haematological and hor- 17. Eliasson, M., E. Hagg, D. Lundblad, R. Karlsson, and E. Bucht. 1993. In-
monal responses to dynamic exercise in patients with chronic airway fluence of smoking and snuff use on electrolytes, adrenal and calcium
obstruction. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 17:75–80. regulating hormones. Acta Endocrinol. (Copenh.) 128:35–40.
8. Ogilvie, C. M., R. E. Forster, and W. S. Blakemore. 1957. A standardized 18. Vestal, R., B. J. Cusack, G. D. Mercer, G. W. Dawson, and B. K. Park.
breath holding technique for the clinical measurement of the diffusing 1987. Aging and drug interactions: I. Effect of cimetidine and smoking
capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide. J. Clin. Invest. 36:1–17. on the oxidation of theophylline and cortisol in healthy men. J. Phar-
9. Roberts, C. M., K. D. MacRae, A. J. Winning, L. Adams, and W. A. macol. Exp. Ther. 241:488–500.

Potrebbero piacerti anche