Confidential

Performance Review Form- Workmen

Review Period: From April 2016 To March 2017 Employee Code:
NAME: DESIGNATION:

DEPARTMENT: QUALIFICATION:

DATE OF BIRTH/AGE: DATE OF JOINING:

GRADE : GRADE w.e.f.:
Please Indicate Your Assessment by Ticking ( ) In the Appropriate Column
RATING BY REVIEWING RATING BY REPORTING
FACTORS
OFFICER OFFICER
Job Knowledge
7 5 3 2 1 (Demonstrated technical knowledge, awareness of 1 2 3 5 7
systems & procedures)
Job Performance
8 6 4 2 1 (Quantity & Quality of output, accuracy, willingness to 1 2 4 6 8
work)
Discipline
5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5
(Conduct, Truthfulness Honesty, Temperament)
Punctuality
5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5
(Attendance & Punctuality at work)
Co-Operation
5 4 3 2 1 (Relation with Superiors Peers & Subordinates 1 2 3 4 5
Acceptability)
Safety & Housekeeping
(i) Conformance & Observance of Safety Rules &
5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5
Practices
(ii) Work place cleanliness
Total Marks Obtained Total Marks Obtained
(Reporting Manager) (Reviewing Manager)
Remarks (if Any) Remarks (Regarding Overall Performance)

Signature Signature

NAME: Name:

Designation: Designation:

Date Date:
Final Rating By Functional Head/Unit Head Signature

B
A+ (Exceeds A B+ C
(Below
Expectation) (Above Expectation ) (Meets Expectation ) (Needs Improvement)
Expectation)
Consistently demonstrated
Surpasses defined effectiveness in meeting or
Cadre success criteria moderately exceeding
Generally met success criteria. Performed below the defined
degree deserving success criteria. Made a Achievement is
This was a satisfactory success criteria. Definite
particular recognition. strong contribution to the marginally less than
capability level with need for improvement is needed
Was a consistent team, department, and expected targets
continued development immediately.
model of excellence to Company through fully
others in this factor satisfactory performance in
this area

Workmen
( Max 35 points) 31 – 35 26 – 30 21 – 25 16 – 20 Below 16